posted September 15, 2004 14:16            

MAY 15 WAS A "TEST" BROADCAST. SOFT LAUNCH WHICH WAS SUPPOSED TO BE ON C-BAND AND IS SUPPOSED TO BE GOING TO THIS DAY IS NOT. THIS ADDITIONALLY WAS GOING TO BE FOR ADVERTISERS TO REVIEW THE CHANNEL. WELL AS WE KNOW, THERE IS NO CHANNEL THAT IS BROADCASTING ON THAT TEST BASIS.

NOW WE GET THE NEWS BROADCAST IN SEPTEMBER WITH ANOTHER DELAY THAT THEY ARE WORKING HARD TO RESOLVE. THEN A DELAY CAUSE OF "SIGNAL PROBLEMS". RCN VERIFIES WE ARE BROADCASTING IN SAN FRANCISCO WHICH WE ARE NOT.

THEN....

A PR STATES WE MOVED TO FIRESTONE INSTEAD OF NETWORK TELEPORTS.

NOW AS OF TODAY, THEY HAVE BEEN TESTING IN AUGUST AND SEPTEMBER. WELL FUNNY, NETWORK TELEPORTS IS HAVING NOT A SINGLE PROBLEM WITH ANY OF IT'S SIGNALS.

BUT THE MAIN POINT IS:

NOW WE PULL OUT OUR REAR END THAT WE HAVE BEEN TESTING A SIGNAL THAT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE UP SINCE JUNE OR JULY ON A "SOFT" LAUNCH BASIS (SO ADVERTISERS CAN SEE IT REMEMBER) AND HOW CONVENIENT THAT A HURRICANE IS SUPPOSED TO HIT LOUISIANA AND THE OFF THE CUFF COMMENT THAT THE WEATHER IS THE PROBLEM.

WHAT ABOUT 2-3 WEEKS AGO WHEN THERE WAS NO HURRICANE IN SIGHT? NO WEATHER PROBLEMS THEN.

OH PLEASE!!!!!!!!

FRANK OLSEN: LISTEN HERE AND LISTEN CLEAR; YOU ARE A FRAUD AND ARE LIEING ON TOP OF LIEING ON TOP OF LIEING SOME MORE.

Q Television Network Moves its Satellite Signal; Network Announces an Agreement with Firestone Communications

posted September 15, 2004 14:28            

Ray, I called WFNX...
http://www.wfnx.com/

and asked if I could find the interview on the site...the person said I've received a lot of faxes with the same request as yours and I'm not aware of this interview...I went on to discuss the ins/outs of her station (because you know I pretty much take a company's word when they say they did an interview if the company has a credible reputation)...and said to this person...it's a gay/lesbian 24/7 tv station about to go national...she said........OHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH YESSSSSSSSSSS WE DO HAVE A GAY/LESBIAN PROGRAM STATION HERE!!! It airs Sunday night from 10 to 12....

here's the website link off the main site...
http://www.wfnx.com/1/jocksshows/jock.asp?id=30

and guess who owns WFNX Ray...
http://cambridge.zami.com/WFNX

WFNX 101.7 FM
WFNX 101.7 FM. 126 Brookline Street Boston, MA. Tel: Fax: Web Site. Business hours:
Mon-Fri 9am-Midnight. Description. Owned by the Boston Phoenix. Categories. ...
http://www.bostonphoenix.com/

if the Boston Phoenix gives it any publicity it should be pretty good....

hope this helps....

posted September 15, 2004 14:34            

quote:

---

Originally posted by U4TSAF2:
WHAT TESTING?

MAY 15 WAS A "TEST" BROADCAST. SOFT LAUNCH WHICH WAS SUPPOSED TO BE ON C-BAND AND IS SUPPOSED TO BE GOING TO THIS DAY IS NOT. THIS ADDITIONALLY WAS GOING TO BE FOR ADVERTISERS TO REVIEW THE CHANNEL. WELL AS WE KNOW, THERE IS NO CHANNEL THAT IS BROADCASTING ON THAT TEST BASIS.

NOW WE GET THE NEWS BROADCAST IN SEPTEMBER WITH ANOTHER DELAY THAT THEY ARE WORKING HARD TO RESOLVE. THEN A DELAY CAUSE OF "SIGNAL PROBLEMS". RCN VERIFIES WE ARE BROADCASTING IN SAN FRANCISCO WHICH WE ARE NOT.

THEN....

A PR STATES WE MOVED TO FIRESTONE INSTEAD OF NETWORK TELEPORTS.

NOW AS OF TODAY, THEY HAVE BEEN TESTING IN AUGUST AND SEPTEMBER. WELL FUNNY, NETWORK TELEPORTS IS HAVING NOT A SINGLE PROBLEM WITH ANY OF IT'S SIGNALS.

BUT THE MAIN POINT IS:

NOW WE PULL OUT OUR REAR END THAT WE HAVE BEEN TESTING A SIGNAL THAT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE UP SINCE JUNE OR JULY ON A "SOFT" LAUNCH BASIS (SO ADVERTISERS CAN SEE IT REMEMBER) AND HOW CONVENIENT THAT A HURRICANE IS SUPPOSED TO HIT LOUISIANA AND THE OFF THE CUFF COMMENT THAT THE WEATHER IS THE PROBLEM.

WHAT ABOUT 2-3 WEEKS AGO WHEN THERE WAS NO HURRICANE IN SIGHT? NO WEATHER PROBLEMS THEN.

OH PLEASE!!!!!!!!

FRANK OLSEN: LISTEN HERE AND LISTEN CLEAR; YOU ARE A FRAUD AND ARE LIEING ON TOP OF LIEING ON TOP OF LIEING SOME MORE.

Q Television Network Moves its Satellite Signal; Network Announces an Agreement with Firestone Communications

"The testing we did in August and early September was very successful, so weather related problems are suspected,"

---

LETS ALL REMEMBER WHY U4 GOT INTO QBID STOCK AND WHAT A STRONG SUPPORTER HE WAS....NOW ALL OF A SUDDEN.......WHAT ARE HIS MOTIVES???? THE BASHERS ARE OUT IN FORCE...THERE IS A WAR GOING ON AT RAGING BULL...IT'S BRUTAL. I'M NOT SURPRISE U4 GETTING INTO THE GAME...
U4TSAF2
Member posted May 04, 2004 21:49
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAST TIME I CHECKED SINCE I'M ONE OF THOSE WHO GOT IN ABOUT 7+ OR SO WEEKS AGO:
QBID HIT A HIGH (RECENT) OF .027

HUM....

ISN'T THAT UP 27,000% FROM ABOUT 10 WEEKS AGO?

NOW QBID DROPS TO .014 TODAY

HUM....

ISN'T THAT ------>UP<------ 14,000% FROM A 10 WEEKS AGO? THAT DOESN'T MAKE MUCH SENSE THAT THE STOCK CAN ----->DROP<----- AND STILL HAVE RISEN 14,000%.

FURTHER, THE STOCK ----->DROPS<----- TO .014 AND TRADES $6 MILLION PLUS DOLLARS.

HUM....

WELL U4TSAF2, I GOT IN AT .018.

YEA U4TSAF2, I GOT IN AT .019.

ME 2 U4TSAF2, I GOT IN AT .01

SO THAT DOESN'T APPLY TO US. YOU JUST GOT LUCKY AND BOUGHT IN EARLIER THAN THE REST OF US.

WE GUESS WHAT:

U4TSAF2 BOUGHT ANOTHER 2 MIL ON TOP OF WHAT HE ALREADY HAD AT .02.

BOY, WHEN THE STOCK HITS .25 YOU CAN TELL EVERYONE WHO GOT IN AT .20 AFTER IT DROPS TO .13 THE STORY I'M GIVING YOU RIGHT HERE.

MARCH 3, 2006

L2 QBID

4X4.00
3X3.99
6X3.98
7X3.97

RESISTANCE IS AT $4.00 AND IF WE CAN GET THROUGH THAT THE SKY'S THE LIMIT

[This message has been edited by U4TSAF2 (edited May 04, 2004).]

posted September 15, 2004 14:35            

quote:

---

Originally posted by sunny:
Kommon...do you think Marco is alluding to another press release?

---

posted September 15, 2004 14:43            

quote:

---

Originally posted by U4TSAF2:
WHAT TESTING?

MAY 15 WAS A "TEST" BROADCAST. SOFT LAUNCH WHICH WAS SUPPOSED TO BE ON C-BAND AND IS SUPPOSED TO BE GOING TO THIS DAY IS NOT. THIS ADDITIONALLY WAS GOING TO BE FOR ADVERTISERS TO REVIEW THE CHANNEL. WELL AS WE KNOW, THERE IS NO CHANNEL THAT IS BROADCASTING ON THAT TEST BASIS.

NOW WE GET THE NEWS BROADCAST IN SEPTEMBER WITH ANOTHER DELAY THAT THEY ARE WORKING HARD TO RESOLVE. THEN A DELAY CAUSE OF "SIGNAL PROBLEMS". RCN VERIFIES WE ARE BROADCASTING IN SAN FRANCISCO WHICH WE ARE NOT.

THEN....

A PR STATES WE MOVED TO FIRESTONE INSTEAD OF NETWORK TELEPORTS.

NOW AS OF TODAY, THEY HAVE BEEN TESTING IN AUGUST AND SEPTEMBER. WELL FUNNY, NETWORK TELEPORTS IS HAVING NOT A SINGLE PROBLEM WITH ANY OF IT'S SIGNALS.

BUT THE MAIN POINT IS:

NOW WE PULL OUT OUR REAR END THAT WE HAVE BEEN TESTING A SIGNAL THAT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE UP SINCE JUNE OR JULY ON A "SOFT" LAUNCH BASIS (SO ADVERTISERS CAN SEE IT REMEMBER) AND HOW CONVENIENT THAT A HURRICANE IS SUPPOSED TO HIT LOUISIANA AND THE OFF THE CUFF COMMENT THAT THE WEATHER IS THE PROBLEM.

WHAT ABOUT 2-3 WEEKS AGO WHEN THERE WAS NO HURRICANE IN SIGHT? NO WEATHER PROBLEMS THEN.

OH PLEASE!!!!!!!!

FRANK OLSEN: LISTEN HERE AND LISTEN CLEAR; YOU ARE A FRAUD AND ARE LIEING ON TOP OF LIEING ON TOP OF LIEING SOME MORE.

Q Television Network Moves its Satellite Signal; Network Announces an Agreement with Firestone Communications

"The testing we did in August and early September was very successful, so weather related problems are suspected,"

---

U4 - You need to look up the word "slander" in the dictionary. IMO you are trying to hurt Olsons reputation and hurt the stock.

posted September 15, 2004 15:28            

It SEEMS that he cut Deveney loose.

And maybe he had to cut Network Teleports loose for some reason.

Does anyone know if Firestone is bigger/better than NT?

posted September 15, 2004 15:36            

Not the real U4 people!!!!!

posted September 15, 2004 15:38            

Ahhh, it's nice to see we filled the Gap!

Just got back and I noticed we filled the .0049 & .0048. Gaps are the best way to daytrade! When a stock gaps up in the morning, you know it will retrace at some point so you can either sell it before it does or take advantage when it retraces.

When a stock gaps down, you can easily take advantage and make a quick profit because it will need to fill the gap. So obviously it will go up.

posted September 15, 2004 15:42            

Lets see if I got this straight. The caps lock might have blurred my vision. Are you calling Frank a liar? Didn't you kinda take the long way around the barn on this one?

posted September 15, 2004 15:49            

It SEEMS that he cut Deveney loose.

And maybe he had to cut Network Teleports loose for some reason.

Does anyone know if Firestone is bigger/better than NT?

posted September 15, 2004 15:50            

quote:

---

Originally posted by WinsumLosesum:
It DOES make me wonder if Frank had a falling out with some who weren't on the same page as he. And that's not a particularly bad thing, either.

It SEEMS that he cut Deveney loose.

And maybe he had to cut Network Teleports loose for some reason.

---

Man I love being devil's advocate

These things go both ways. Don't discount the possibility that Deveney is the one who backed out of the deal (if there was in fact a fallout there). Recall that FO was sending out PRs without Deveney's knowledge. Now if you're a bigshot PR company and this little fly by night guy comes along and hires you, then continues to do his own thing, it would be in your best interest to say "thanks for the business, but we're outta here." At the same time, it seems as though he's gone with a tiny PR company with only 4 current clients. This would indicate a money problem to me. If you can't afford to pay for the 2000 lb PR gorilla, get the PR gerbil instead.

As far as Network Teleports goes.. I have a feeling that just about anyone would be better. I have a hard time placing trust in a technology based company that hasn't updated their website in over 9 years.

And on the issue of spelling, I also found that quite funny One thing I've noticed though is how many people here happen to spell huge "hugh" and doubt "dought"... makes me wonder when 3 or 4 different people all spell the same simple words incorrectly in the same way. But whatever.

-R

posted September 15, 2004 16:10            

quote:

---

Originally posted by RobinO:
Man I love being devil's advocate

These things go both ways. Don't discount the possibility that Deveney is the one who backed out of the deal (if there was in fact a fallout there). Recall that FO was sending out PRs without Deveney's knowledge. Now if you're a bigshot PR company and this little fly by night guy comes along and hires you, then continues to do his own thing, it would be in your best interest to say "thanks for the business, but we're outta here." At the same time, it seems as though he's gone with a tiny PR company with only 4 current clients. This would indicate a money problem to me. If you can't afford to pay for the 2000 lb PR gorilla, get the PR gerbil instead.

As far as Network Teleports goes.. I have a feeling that just about anyone would be better. I have a hard time placing trust in a technology based company that hasn't updated their website in over 9 years.

And on the issue of spelling, I also found that quite funny One thing I've noticed though is how many people here happen to spell huge "hugh" and doubt "dought"... makes me wonder when 3 or 4 different people all spell the same simple words incorrectly in the same way. But whatever.

-R

This has been a public service announcement from your local curmudgeon. The pps will now rise, your debt will disappear, and your genitals will grow 4".

---

WELL ITS GOOD TO KNOW YOU NOW WILL BE UP IN THE AVERAGE SIZE RANGE (i.e, 5.5inches)

posted September 15, 2004 16:15            

Here's a link to an article regarding Sorpresa launch on Firestone Communications back in March of 2003.
http://www.medialifemagazine.com/news2003/mar03/mar17/1_mon/news3monday.html

I found this interesting, but I wouldn't read a lot into it at this point:

"That time came this weekend with the Saturday launch of Firestone Communications' Sorpresa, a digital cable network with initial carriage on Time Warner Cable, Cox and the National Cable TV Cooperative."

posted September 15, 2004 16:29            

quote:

---

Originally posted by RobinO:
Man I love being devil's advocate

And on the issue of spelling, I also found that quite funny One thing I've noticed though is how many people here happen to spell huge "hugh" and doubt "dought"... makes me wonder when 3 or 4 different people all spell the same simple words incorrectly in the same way. But whatever.

-R

This has been a public service announcement from your local curmudgeon. The pps will now rise, your debt will disappear, and your genitals will grow 4".

---

posted September 15, 2004 16:58            

quote:

---

Originally posted by bill1352:
it sure has to make ya wonder...the guy was off by only 1 1/2 hrs and that could have been the frank released it at 6 and it took that time to get posted.....350 million shares??? wouldn't that be nice...the old song you can take this job % shove it comes to mind...lol

---

posted September 15, 2004 17:12            

Shhhh. Wanna see the funniest thing? There's a guy talking to himself over on the SPRU thread. It's so pathetic!

posted September 15, 2004 17:19            

quote:

---

Originally posted by WinsumLosesum:
Off-topic:

Shhhh. Wanna see the funniest thing? There's a guy talking to himself over on the SPRU thread. It's so pathetic!

And the winner for best solo pumping performance goes to... (drum roll please...)

---

Maybe U4 would like to be his friend.

posted September 15, 2004 17:21            

Just got back from doc's office...referrals in hand...Yeaah!!! Back-popper here I come!
(chiropractor)

Anyway, saw we closed at 0048...tomorrow I think we will start the move up.

Anyone heard from our new friend, Marco...(pollo)...sorry had to say that...

posted September 15, 2004 17:21            

Thanks for your interest in One In Ten. I am sorry to
say that archived interviews and transcripts of
interviews are not available.

We thank you for listening to the real alternative,
FNX.

Keith Orr
Producer/Host
One In Ten
Sundays from 10pm to Midnight www.fnxradio.com

posted September 15, 2004 17:24            

quote:

---

Originally posted by U4TSAF2:

... SOFT LAUNCH WHICH WAS SUPPOSED TO BE ON C-BAND AND IS SUPPOSED TO BE GOING TO THIS DAY IS NOT...

---

No, the soft launch is NOT supposed to still be going on. A soft launch stops when the hard launch commences. Granted, there isn't much in the way of broadcast signal to boast of, but my point is that your details are inaccurate.

quote:

---

...RCN VERIFIES WE ARE BROADCASTING IN SAN FRANCISCO WHICH WE ARE NOT...

---

You've verified this? Some claim to have seen it. I don't know them, but I trust them more than I trust you.

quote:

---

... WELL FUNNY, NETWORK TELEPORTS IS HAVING NOT A SINGLE PROBLEM WITH ANY OF IT'S SIGNALS...

---

How do you know this? Have you contacted them directly or have you viewed every station they broadcast? What is the name of the person you spoke with and what is their phone number/extension?

quote:

---

...SO ADVERTISERS CAN SEE IT REMEMBER...

---

A soft launch is not for advertisers. It is for carriers to review. You'd think that after months on here you'd learn something. Of course, you still say "notta" and "lieing", so let me put on my big surprise face....

quote:

---

WHAT ABOUT 2-3 WEEKS AGO WHEN THERE WAS NO HURRICANE IN SIGHT? NO WEATHER PROBLEMS THEN.

---

I don't recall seeing a PR that blames the hurricane. If I'm wrong, please post the link to it. There is a difference between blaming a hurricane and suspected weather problems. I can tell you that the weather here causes DAILY outages of electricity and cable tv throughout the summer months... yes, DAILY! It may be the same there or it may not be. I don't know, but don't read into what was stated.

quote:

---

... LISTEN HERE AND LISTEN CLEAR; YOU ARE A FRAUD AND ARE LIEING ON TOP OF LIEING ON TOP OF LIEING SOME MORE...

---

Self-realization?

So, as you can see, your views are not exactly truthful or accurate. Why should we believe anything you say if you lack such attention to accurate detail?

posted September 15, 2004 17:26            

quote:

---

Originally posted by WinsumLosesum:
...

And the winner for best solo pumping performance goes to... (drum roll please...)

---

posted September 15, 2004 17:30            

quote:

---

Originally posted by sunny:
Just checked out SPRU...looks like me on the ITDJ thread a few days ago...now I know someone was laughing at me...(hate it when that happens )

---

posted September 15, 2004 17:36            

quote:

---

Originally posted by sunny:
Just checked out SPRU...looks like me on the ITDJ thread a few days ago...now I know someone was laughing at me...(hate it when that happens )

---

Thanks for the heads up, sunny. So I had to look at ITDJ. What a hoot! Don't worry. I'm laughing AT you, not WITH you... or however that goes...

sunny posted:

"Yes, I realize how pathetic I look being the only poster and all, but..."

sunny, I'm adding "very perceptive" to your list of admirable qualities.

posted September 15, 2004 17:37            

quote:

---

Originally posted by sunny:
uh, thanks, Pharm...so the conversations with myself are abnormal? Damn, thought I had a new best friend LOL...least there isn't any 'solo pumping' occuring... That goes on my "things to be grateful for" list!

---

posted September 15, 2004 17:39            

quote:

---

slpj1960
Member posted September 15, 2004 15:54
(This post and question is for the people that spend a whole lot of time knocking this stock) I appreciate your trouble in trying to save a person like myself from a stock like this that I believe in, but have a question for you all if you dont mind. With all of the free time that you spend here trying to help me "Would any of you like to tell me about a stock that you do like?" If you all are trying to look out for people like me who have to work alot, you wont mind answering this question.

---

posted September 15, 2004 17:48            

Get a grip U4 you are not convincing anyone here what it your schedual.

you are not doing it for the good of people.

but it is good to see you here as i feel it mans that this is going to pop any time and you are working extra hard to try and hop on the buss at a lower price.

Good luck to you U4 thanks for the positive info

quote:

---

Originally posted by U4TSAF2:
WHAT TESTING?

MAY 15 WAS A "TEST" BROADCAST. SOFT LAUNCH WHICH WAS SUPPOSED TO BE ON C-BAND AND IS SUPPOSED TO BE GOING TO THIS DAY IS NOT. THIS ADDITIONALLY WAS GOING TO BE FOR ADVERTISERS TO REVIEW THE CHANNEL. WELL AS WE KNOW, THERE IS NO CHANNEL THAT IS BROADCASTING ON THAT TEST BASIS.

NOW WE GET THE NEWS BROADCAST IN SEPTEMBER WITH ANOTHER DELAY THAT THEY ARE WORKING HARD TO RESOLVE. THEN A DELAY CAUSE OF "SIGNAL PROBLEMS". RCN VERIFIES WE ARE BROADCASTING IN SAN FRANCISCO WHICH WE ARE NOT.

THEN....

A PR STATES WE MOVED TO FIRESTONE INSTEAD OF NETWORK TELEPORTS.

NOW AS OF TODAY, THEY HAVE BEEN TESTING IN AUGUST AND SEPTEMBER. WELL FUNNY, NETWORK TELEPORTS IS HAVING NOT A SINGLE PROBLEM WITH ANY OF IT'S SIGNALS.

BUT THE MAIN POINT IS:

NOW WE PULL OUT OUR REAR END THAT WE HAVE BEEN TESTING A SIGNAL THAT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE UP SINCE JUNE OR JULY ON A "SOFT" LAUNCH BASIS (SO ADVERTISERS CAN SEE IT REMEMBER) AND HOW CONVENIENT THAT A HURRICANE IS SUPPOSED TO HIT LOUISIANA AND THE OFF THE CUFF COMMENT THAT THE WEATHER IS THE PROBLEM.

WHAT ABOUT 2-3 WEEKS AGO WHEN THERE WAS NO HURRICANE IN SIGHT? NO WEATHER PROBLEMS THEN.

OH PLEASE!!!!!!!!

FRANK OLSEN: LISTEN HERE AND LISTEN CLEAR; YOU ARE A FRAUD AND ARE LIEING ON TOP OF LIEING ON TOP OF LIEING SOME MORE.

Q Television Network Moves its Satellite Signal; Network Announces an Agreement with Firestone Communications

"The testing we did in August and early September was very successful, so weather related problems are suspected,"

---

posted September 15, 2004 17:57            

quote:

---

Originally posted by penny-trader:
...you are not doing it for the good of people...

---

posted September 15, 2004 18:11            

RobinO
Member posted September 12, 2004 12:14
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by 1BigTip:
RobinO --- ONE SIMPLE QUESTION.
WHERE ELSE DID YOU POST THAT?

Be smart guys! Why would they waste that time for QBID?

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Huh? Allstocks is the only stock-related message forum I read

Go Q Television Network!!!!!!!!!!
Mcfly

[This message has been edited by firefly (edited September 15, 2004).]

posted September 15, 2004 18:22            

quote:

---

Originally posted by RobinO:
Huh? Allstocks is the only stock-related message forum I read. Not sure what your point is. I had some spare time yesterday and decided to do some DD. I already know as much as I need to about the company, so instead I decided to take a peek at the history of some of the pumpers here. You may think that's mean or irrelevant, but I'd disagree. In any field, it's best to shop around for a professional or someone to get advice from. Whether it's a doctor, stock broker, accountant, home builder, or wedding photographer, you want to know that the person you're hiring has a good track record of positive results and satisfied customers. If you're shopping for a stock broker and find out that Broker A has a track record of -80%, would you feel comfortable letting him handle your money? Or would you feel more comfortable going with Broker B, who has turned consistent results of +15% over the last 10 years?

The point is that there are many people here who do nothing but pump pump pump.. If you see their posts in other threads, they do the same thing and make the same claims.. pump pump pump.. going to a dollar! going to the moon! Yet none of these things has materialized. In fact, the exact opposite has happened. Yet no one ever tells them to stfu. But when someone posts some accurate, yet negative information, the board comes down on them for being a basher and tells that person to go away. This intrigues me.

My goal is to gain some insight as to why people choose to ignore the bearers of bad news who have generally been correct, while showering praise and admiration on those who make positive and uplifting, yet false and unwarranted claims.

-R

---

posted September 15, 2004 18:31            

A:
Every week, people come on the board and tell us the future - and after a while it becomes routine.That is why we are all so hard to convince. People come on this board all the time and try to fool everyone. Do you understand how that could make us skeptical? Seriously - this board has made me a crazy person! You see - people do this kind of stuff to us longs all the time. So we get used to shrugging it all off.