posted September 14, 2004 15:27            

quote:

---

Originally posted by U4TSAF2:
ANOTHER FLAT OUT LIE BY CEO FRANK OLSEN SINCE WE ARE NOT BROADCASTING.
HTTP://WWW.QTELEVISION.COM

RCN cable subscribers in Boston, New York, Philadelphia, Chicago, San Francisco and Washington, D.C. can receive Q Television starting September 2004. Its gay and lesbian family programming will be available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. “Q Television was created to provide quality programming to gay and lesbian audiences throughout the United States,” said Q Television President Frank Olsen. “We are delighted with this agreement since RCN’s offers high-quality premium entertainment in major metropolitan areas where demand is high for our programming.”

---

--------------------------------------------

At least wait until October before you consider this one a lie. Chill out man, if you don't like this stock then leave this post and don't come back. If you don't have any of this stock than why are you here? Unless you are trying to get the price down to a level where you want to buy it. I think it is time for you to get a life and move on to something else.

I beleive this will be something big in a year or so however it takes more than a month to get things up and running in good shape. Patience is a necessity when it comes to pinks.

JMHO

Steve

posted September 14, 2004 15:59            

You guys all need to relax ... it seems that you all are so eager to jump on each others posts that you do not even take the time to read them properly

suzainiee :

Your following post :

suzainiee
Member posted September 14, 2004 14:11

Robin0,
And what were you doing yesterday while QTV was showing on channel 255?

Oh yeah, you were busy posting your description of QBID shareholders as "fools" and "suckers".

Plus, you JUST got confirmation from RCN. Why didn't you post the entire, unedited email?

When you show up--good things are just around the corner.

Had you taken just maybe an extra second you would have seen that the post you replied back to :

Originally posted by Trader O:
Just got confirmation from Jim Downing at RCN that Q is on channel 255 in SF. Anyone can confirm this by emailing Mr. Downing at Investor Relations <Investor.Relations@rcn.net>
-----------
Yes, that is true- sorry I didn't inform you about this yesterday. Our SF
market has launched QTV on channel 255. Other markets still slated for an
October 1 launch date.
Sincerely,

Jim Downing
RCN

... was from Trader O ... NOT RobinO ... but then again we go back that whole "tenacious focus" right?

I dont think RobinO can help you out with the post for the unedited email....but I guess one never knows around here.

Everyone just relax. Quit making excuses for people. Quit trying to show that you are a better picker than others. In my opinion if one was that great they really would not be on a message board.

kommoncents - just one comment on the statement about "DON'T CREATE MOMENTUM TO RUIN IT FOR EVERYONE ELSE BUY POSTING EXAGGERATION AND MISTRUTHS ON A RESPECTED BOARD THAT SERIOUS PEOPLE USE TO MAKE DECISIONS."

- I really have to say something about that. These boards are for the most part unregulated (read to mean by law - sec). Every now and then something will cause a chain reaction for someone to cause the SEC to investigate but usually by then its too late and a lot of people have lost money. What I am trying to get at is that people need to be skeptical about each and every single post here. Anonymity almost always guarantees that a few people out of the bunch will try and create an environment that is more beneficial to themselves as compared to others. If "serious" people are using this public board to make decisions regarding their own portfolios then best of luck to them but do not try and even complain for one second if something does not work out the way a thread is pointing. In the short run they might get lucky but the odds are against them to really make out. It is very risky to go by a lot of what is posted. Everyone needs to do their own research and decide for themselves. If they are too lazy or just do not want to and want to follow a heard then at some point they deserve to get trampled. Start a "private" group with some people that you "trust" from here. Get to know them - their real names etc - talk to them on the phone - cheap a$$'s out there use yahoo voice chat or something else. Make group decisions etc and that will probably work out a lot better than just going by the top threads at any board.

Just remember people that in the grand scheme of things we all want to do good and make a lot of money. Some of us unfortunately just want a bigger share than others but you know what - that is life. They will screw people no matter what is at stake.

This is a message board. Not everyone will be in agreement with everything. Not everyone has to own a position in a security to be able to post on it. This is all public domain. Dont like what you are reading? You dont have to respond to it. If some of the pay scales are accurate for "pumpers and bashers" then by responding to them you are paying them. Good job! Why not just send me money via a wire transfer every day? Let me know I will be more than happy to provide you with a ‘account’ to dump money into.

Anyway - Hi folks - been a while since I was active here but I guess I really did not miss much. LOL

Good Luck to all and for you others who are skeptical of my well wishes to you … good for you!

Remember … just breathe.. count to the number that the Q thread is up to and then reply if you absolutely must!

posted September 14, 2004 16:03            

I have another question, is it, yall only want to see the positive stuff? Duh, yeah I would love to only see the POS on everything, but that is not the life or world we live in, now is it? Freedom of posting here.

READ THEM, if you don't like, then move on and don't push him further. Each time someone talks of his post, he post another. I really wonder if yall can see this.

There is two sides to everything and some of yall can't handle it.

I am going to email BOB FREY and ask him to change it from ALLSTOCKS, to Positive, No BASH STOCKS. Maybe that will make a few of yall happy. GET REAL.

Thanks,
Chuck

quote:

---

Originally posted by CashRules:
Does this guy get paid by the post he puts out or does he have nothing better to do?

---

posted September 14, 2004 16:05            

We're about 2 weeks out from October...not a big deal to me...Heck, if it took Frank until December to get everything in order, I'd be fine. This is not a 'quickie.' This one will take a little time.

...just breathe, as Sharkus, says...hey, that's what Suzainiee says, too ...teasing...good advice!

posted September 14, 2004 16:08            

My sincere apologies to Trader0 for misreading your name.

Sharkus, have you considered taking a little of your own chill advice?

posted September 14, 2004 16:15            

-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Downing
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 8:29 AM
To: ----------
Subject: Re: Investment Question

Mr. _______ -

Thanks for the note and for your interest in RCN and QTV.

Both RCN and QTV agreed that we'd rather have a successful launch that had
to be put off a few weeks instead of rushing it out there before it was
ready.

In San Francisco, it is currently available on channel 255- it will
be available in other markets by October 1 (Boston, Philadelphia, NYC,
Chicago, Wash DC). QTV will be offered as a premium service for $7.95 per
month and will not be bundled with other offers.

Sincerely,

Jim Downing
RCN Investor/Public Relations

posted September 14, 2004 16:18            

Out.

posted September 14, 2004 16:32            

Since you chose to post only a phrase from my sentence, you might consider taking another look.

If you had read it more carefully, perhaps you would have seen that I was sincerely thanking U4 for his tenacious focus of negative QBID posts. I am truly thrilled when he starts this stuff again.

However, it was not U4 that replied.

posted September 14, 2004 16:35            

If you dont like this stock i can appreciate that. If you dont own then you shoudl feel great with your choices. But what are you still doing here. Unless you are looking to buy more of the stock in which case you have faith in the fact that the price will go back up. thus showing that you are here for no other reason then to scam us out of our shares.

People beware. do your own DD and make your own decisions. U4 has a hidden agenda that will result in him buying your shares from you at a large loose for you.

Im not telling anyone to hold or to sell but to be very careful that you buy and sell on good informatiion not on BS and twisted manipulated facts.

quote:

---

Originally posted by GatorMan:
OK, I'll agree with many of the observations made by U4, or I I havent' done the research myself to tell if therey are true or not. But there are a few I must take exception with at this time since we don't have, nor to my knowledge can we get, the information to come to a conclusion. They may eventually prove to be true but I think for now we can't conclude that they are.

[b]3. THERE IS NO 10-YEAR DEAL WITH TIME WARNER. WE WERE TOLD THERE IS BUT THERE ISN'T. WE WERE TOLD WE WERE GIVEN A HUNTING LICENSE BUT THIS IS MISLEADING ON IT'S FACE AND BOTTOM LINE, THERE IS NO DEAL WITH TIME WARNER.

How do you know this? I've seen no evidence that there is NOT a deal.

8. WE HAVE A "DEAL" WITH NETWORK TELEPORTS TO TEST OUR SOFT LAUNCH ON C-BAND (BIG SATELLITE DISHES) AND WE SEEN 1-PROGRAM WITH 2 OTHERS REPORTED FOR THE ENTIRE TIME THIS "SOFT" LAUNCH TOOK PLACE. FURTHER, SHORTLY THEREAFTER, THE SIGNAL COULD NOT BE FOUND.

I was able to witness some of the "soft" launch on C-Band, which was later termed a "test", if this is what you are refering to My reception wan't good but I think that was problems on my side since others reported seeing the signal sent to the few cable carriers that aired the test. I recall there being at least two programs, a movie and the documentary. That signal could not be found later because the test was only for about 5 hours, I think.

10. WE ARE TOLD THAT THE LOCAL WORK FOR Q-TV SHALL BE "SUB-CONTRACTED" OUT TO THE LOCAL STATIONS WHERE NEWS IS HAPPENING. TO DATE, NOT A SINGLE LOCAL NETWORK HAS BEEN RETAINED.

And you know this, how?

11. WE ARE TOLD Q-MOBILES AND THIS IS ANOTHER LIE.

Again, how do you know this is a lie?

12. REGARDING OUR "SOFT" LAUNCH, THIS WAS FOR VIEWING BY THE ADVERTISERS TO SEE WHAT Q-TV IS ALL ABOUT. FURTHER, NOT A SINGLE ADVERTISERS HAS BEEN CONTRACTED. THE ONLY EXCEPTION IS A FEW WEB-PAGE ADS ON THE Q-TV WEBSITE AND OF THOSE ADVERTISERS, THEY BRING NO CREDIBILITY TO Q-TV AS A "REAL" STATION.

True, we've not been told of any advertisers, but how does that prove we have not contracted any?

18. THE ONLY PEOPLE FOR THE MOST PART WHO KNOW ABOUT Q-TV ARE THOSE OF YOU RIGHT HERE ON A MESSAGE BOARD. 250,000 HITS ON THE Q WEBSITE ARE FROM THOSE OF YOU CHECKING OUT TO SEE IT. THE GENERAL PUBLIC KNOWS NOTTA ABOUT Q-TV.

While I suspect this is mostly true, we really have no way of telling exactly where the hits come from.

20. WE HAVE SPECIAL INCENTIVES FOR ADVERTISERS WITH Q-TV FOR THE FIRST YEAR. DAY 1 OF "BROADCAST" AND GUESS WHAT, NOT A SINGLE ADVERTISER. IT'S ONLY BEEN 3 MONTHS OR SO FOR THEM TO FIND SOME ADVERTISERS BUT WE HAVE NONE.

See my response to #12.

22. WE HAVE A "MAJOR" ANNOUNCEMENT REGARDING PICKING UP A FEW FLICKS FROM WARNER BRO'S. WELL 2 WERE NEVER RELEASED AND 3 WERE FLOPS. BUT WE ARE TOLD THEY ARE SOME OF THE GREATEST MOVIES OF ALL TIME. PRIOR TO THIS, WE ARE TOLD WE HAVE 2-ROOMS FULL OF PROGRAMMING.

As I posted before, the PR does not say that the "flicks" listed are the only ones QTN got. The way I read it they are just a sample of what we got. I can't attest to the quality since I don't think I ever saw any of them.

25. FRANK TELLS US THAT EXECUTIVES HAVE MADE GREAT INROADS IN FIRMING UP NETWORK CARRIAGE AND MAKING NEW APPOINTMENTS FOR CARRIAGE. NOPE, WE GOT RCN WHICH IS A FINANCIAL MESS.

We don't know this is not the case since we've not been told any details.

26. WE HAVE A HOTLINE TO TAKE CALLS TO UPDATE SHAREHOLDERS WHICH IS NO LONGER USED.

And this proves, what? Maybe they decided that PRs were a better way to go so as to not risk giving out insider information.

[/B]

---

posted September 14, 2004 16:41            

&setlineupcookie=true&.intl=us&zip=94107&.done=&lineup=us_CA02268d]

posted September 14, 2004 16:49            

Do you all think if someone called Frank, and asked him why he didn't release a PR about San Fran, he say, "Oh crap, I forgot," or "Why? Are PRs with good news in them a good thing?" Let's get real here.

Whether we like it or not, Frank HAS a reason. Here are some maybe's. (kommoncents addressed some of these already @ 14:23 today)

• MAYBE Frank doesn't want the pps to rise until he's finished buying shares back.
• MAYBE Frank realizes (as we now do) that there are always delays in this business, and you can't delete PRs once you release them (as U4 proves over and over and over again).
* MAYBE one of the mistakes Frank has vowed to not repeat, is to PR every little step in the process. ("Ah," you say, "But launcing in SF is NOT a little step." Read on.)
* MAYBE Frank believes that a PR for every city that airs may be a GOOD idea, but a BETTER idea is a PR that Q is on the air nationwide with advertisers. (Shock and Awe)
• MAYBE Frank knows it is easier for the opposition to stop a network that is starting up, than it is to stop a network that is up and running.

posted September 14, 2004 16:49            

quote:

---

Originally posted by $CashMaker$:
If this is TRUE, then did he get paid for pumping this stock in the past?

I have another question, is it, yall only want to see the positive stuff? Duh, yeah I would love to only see the POS on everything, but that is not the life or world we live in, now is it? Freedom of posting here.

READ THEM, if you don't like, then move on and don't push him further. Each time someone talks of his post, he post another. I really wonder if yall can see this.

There is two sides to everything and some of yall can't handle it.

I am going to email BOB FREY and ask him to change it from ALLSTOCKS, to Positive, No BASH STOCKS. Maybe that will make a few of yall happy. GET REAL.

Thanks,
Chuck

---

I don't think it's that we only want to see the positive stuff. I think we only want to see what's TRUE, not somebody stating as fact, good OR bad, something that is only their opinion or they can't substantiate. I get just as annoyed with the hype as I to with the bashing. And I don't know most of the time what the poster's motive is, basher's especially. I don't think either type of poster lives in the real world - the pumpers want to believe everything's great, find wonderful things in every PR and are greatly optimistic. The bashers see everything as a scam or see every PR as a lie. And when a future event touted by a PR doesn't come to pass, well that's just more proof of the scam. It's also possible that they bash because that's how they get their jollies, causing chaos and making people uneasy about their investments.

Now, I can't say if QBID will turn out to be one big scam, a poorly managed company, one that just can't make a go regardless of the management due to things external, or will be become the next great television network. As for me, my 20m shares are all free anyway so none of my own money is in it anymore (OK, technically the money is mine, but if the stock tanks I'll have no net loss). I try not to stress over this one way or another (and yes, if it went straight up there would be stress in trying to decide when to sell out). But for me it's fun to dream about the possibility of making major money in this. Maybe even enough to retire.

But I digress.

My point is extremism in anything is bad. It would be nice if people would just post as DD credible sources and information. But that's not going to happen since everyone has their own agenda. I may get annoyed at some posts but I don't loose sleep over it, and in fact very seldom even post.

So to answer your question, no I don't just want to see the positive stuff. I want to see facts and respectful opinions. And maybe I've just hit upon the thing that really annoys me is the lack of respect. And maybe people get on the bashers more since they seem to be the ones who show it the least. You talk about freedom to post, which is true. But with any freedom comes responsibility. Showing respect to your audience is one of those responsibilities.

posted September 14, 2004 16:52            

Ric

quote:

---

Originally posted by a4realguy:
Wish I had found a channel 255 when I went here:

---

posted September 14, 2004 16:54            

quote:

---

Originally posted by a4realguy:
Wish I had found a channel 255 when I went here:

---

I think it must take time to get the new listing up to date. I've not even seen it listed on RCN's website for SF.

posted September 14, 2004 16:55            

There is a twisted openness in his contradictory posts--he's a guy on a mission who will do whatever it takes.

At least the boldness in his posts have made him transparent unlike those who circumvent to provide his support.

Winsum, your "maybe's" hit the target. QTV is a fact. You are definitely on the other end of the spectrum from "idiot".

The handholding period left with the hotline--it just hasn't sunk in with everybody yet. We've moved into a differnt phase--the we are a television network phase.
Yes!

posted September 14, 2004 17:01            

Ric

quote:

---

Originally posted by $CashMaker$:
READ THEM, if you don't like, then move on and don't push him further. Each time someone talks of his post, he post another. I really wonder if yall can see this.

Thanks,
Chuck

---

posted September 14, 2004 17:08            

quote:

---

Originally posted by U4TSAF2:
THE NETWORK NEVER NEVER NEVER REVERTED TO A SCRAMBLED SIGNAL.

ANOTHER FLAT OUT LIE COURTESY OF YOUR CEO FRANK OLSEN.

HTTP://WWW.QTELEVISION.COM

Q TELEVISION NETWORK CONFIRMS SOFT LAUNCH

Q Television Network continues its drive towards its public launch and will air on May 15, 2004 a test of its broadcast signal. This signal will be sent out in analog format and will be viewable to all C-band dish owners. After this test is concluded, network will revert to a digital scrambled signal as it continues towards its regular soft launch to cable, satellite and advertising concerns. Further information regarding satellite and transponder for viewing will be posted in the coming days.

---

LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, NEWBIES, HERE AGAIN IS WHY U4TSAF2 IS UPSET AND WHINING AND BASHING AND MISREPRESENTING Q TELEVISION NETWORK.....HE IS ANGRY MAN...HE HAS BRAGGED ABOUT BEING SOME HIGH FALLOOTING STOCK GUY WHO MANAGED BIG NAME ACCOUNTS AND GOT SWALLOWED UP BY THE WORLD OF PENNY STOCKS.....

HERE IS WHAT U4 WAS SAYING AND THE CATALYST FOR HIM TO BE SUCH A STRONG PROPONENT OF QBID STOCK....NOW ALL OF A SUDDEN HE WANTS TO BASH, BASH, BASH, BASH....GOES AWAY FOR AWHILE AND COMES BACK TO BASH, BASH, BASH AND MISREPRESENT......U4, ARE YOU A MARKET MAKER??
WELL U4TSAF2, I GOT IN AT .018.

YEA U4TSAF2, I GOT IN AT .019.

ME 2 U4TSAF2, I GOT IN AT .01

SO THAT DOESN'T APPLY TO US. YOU JUST GOT LUCKY AND BOUGHT IN EARLIER THAN THE REST OF US.

WE GUESS WHAT:

U4TSAF2 BOUGHT ANOTHER 2 MIL ON TOP OF WHAT HE ALREADY HAD AT .02.

posted September 14, 2004 17:13            

quote:

---

Originally posted by $CashMaker$:
If this is TRUE, then did he get paid for pumping this stock in the past?

I have another question, is it, yall only want to see the positive stuff? Duh, yeah I would love to only see the POS on everything, but that is not the life or world we live in, now is it? Freedom of posting here.

READ THEM, if you don't like, then move on and don't push him further. Each time someone talks of his post, he post another. I really wonder if yall can see this.

There is two sides to everything and some of yall can't handle it.

I am going to email BOB FREY and ask him to change it from ALLSTOCKS, to Positive, No BASH STOCKS. Maybe that will make a few of yall happy. GET REAL.

Thanks,
Chuck

---

I VOTE WE CHANGE IT TO "SEND $10 DOLLARS TO ME VIA PAY PAL BECAUSE I'M A LOUSY A&M GRADUATE WITH SHEEPSKING THAT AIN'T WORTH A DAMN SO I GOT TO SCAM $10 FROM EVERYONE FOR A "NEW CAMERA" AT THE NCTA CONVENTION.

posted September 14, 2004 17:21            

quote:

---

Originally posted by kommoncents:
I VOTE WE CHANGE IT TO "SEND $10 DOLLARS TO ME VIA PAY PAL BECAUSE I'M A LOUSY A&M GRADUATE WITH SHEEPSKING THAT AIN'T WORTH A DAMN SO I GOT TO SCAM $10 FROM EVERYONE FOR A "NEW CAMERA" AT THE NCTA CONVENTION.

---

posted September 14, 2004 17:22            

Did this post you just placed, make you feel better? Did it accomplish anything for you? Did it make you feel good?

Funny,
Chuck

And for your info, I didn't scam nothing, the majority of the people that sent funds, got the info they needed and made money from it. I know, it was just Kommencents that made you post that.

Thanks and THE END

quote:

---

Originally posted by kommoncents:
I VOTE WE CHANGE IT TO "SEND $10 DOLLARS TO ME VIA PAY PAL BECAUSE I'M A LOUSY A&M GRADUATE WITH SHEEPSKING THAT AIN'T WORTH A DAMN SO I GOT TO SCAM $10 FROM EVERYONE FOR A "NEW CAMERA" AT THE NCTA CONVENTION.

---

posted September 14, 2004 17:37            

It did when you pumped and it does when you bash. Only the smart ones will figure out what your objective is. I'm here to help people, and your here to help yourself or other investors/MM's.

So I will leave everyone with this post from U4. Just remember, he has only posted in the QBID forum at allstocks, except for one other thread which he had 2 posts...1 of which he gave some info and the other is this:::

quote:

---

Originally posted by U4TSAF2:
JUST FOR THE RECORD HERE FOLKS, MY LAST POST ABOVE THIS ONE IS A SPOOF. I PUT THIS OUT FOR THE FOLKS WHO MAY BE NEW OR SIMPLY DO NOT UNDERSTAND.

DO NOT TAKE MY PREVIOUS POST WHICH IS DIRECTLY ABOVE THIS SERIOUSLY. IT IS A POKE AT BRAND.

---

Sorry U4 the GiG is up.
kommonsense, keep that up, its great to see his pumps.

posted September 14, 2004 17:43            

quote:

---

Originally posted by $CashMaker$:
Last response for you, from me.

Did this post you just placed, make you feel better? Did it accomplish anything for you? Did it make you feel good?

Funny,
Chuck

And for your info, I didn't scam nothing, the majority of the people that sent funds, got the info they needed and made money from it. I know, it was just Kommencents that made you post that.

Thanks and THE END

ACTUALLY YES...IT MADE ME FEEL GOOD TO KNOW YOU FINALLY ADMITTED "MOST OF THE PEOPLE"...."MOST OF THE PEOPLE" GOT THERE INFORMATION....THEN YOU PRETTY MUCH DROPPED OFF THE BOARD....HHHMMMMM...LOOKS AWFULLY FISHY...LIKE ANOTHER TEXAN WHO'S IN THE WHITEHOUSE...

TAKE ANY NEW PICTURES WITH YOUR CAMERA LATELY? HOW'S IT WORKING OUT FOR YOU?

[QUOTE]Originally posted by kommoncents:
[b] I VOTE WE CHANGE IT TO "SEND $10 DOLLARS TO ME VIA PAY PAL BECAUSE I'M A LOUSY A&M GRADUATE WITH SHEEPSKING THAT AIN'T WORTH A DAMN SO I GOT TO SCAM $10 FROM EVERYONE FOR A "NEW CAMERA" AT THE NCTA CONVENTION.

---

[This message has been edited by $CashMaker$ (edited September 14, 2004).][/B][/QUOTE]

posted September 14, 2004 18:09            

As far as pay channel having advertisers. There's a first for everything, and if advertisers are willing to pay me, I wouldn't think twice about doing it.

Plus the fact I don't think a Gay & Lesbian channel would fit well in basic cable for free.

Thanks for asking.

quote:

---

Originally posted by brandwilliams:
Gonna ask again since I got no response. I keep hearing advertisers this advertisers that. We are waiting for and needing advertisers. My question is, what pay channel has advertisers? There are none, thats why you pay extra for the channel. They make their money off your subscription to their channel. There are no commercials or advertisers on any pay channels I have ever seen....???

Brandon

---

posted September 14, 2004 18:18            

DON'T YOU THINK PEOPLE THAT BOUGHT QBID AT 40 CENTS YEARS AGO, & SAW THE PRICE GO TO .0001 FILED WITH THE SEC??? I KNOW ALREADY U4 & SEVEN OTHERS CLAIMED THEY FILED A COMPLAINT AGAINST QBID WITH THE SEC.

DON'T YOU THINK THE SEC WOULD HAVE DONE SOMETHING BY NOW? I WAS TOLD BY THE SEC THAT THEY INVESTIGATE EVERY COMPLAINT THAT COMES IN AS LONG AS THERE ARE SEVERAL OF THE SAME COMPLAINTS.

NOW I SERIOUSLY DOUGHT 1 PERSON FILED A COMPLAINT ABOUT QBID...I'M SURE MANY DID BACK THEN.

THEY ALSO SAID IT CAN TAKE MONTHS TO HEAR BACK FROM THEM IF YOU HEAR ANYTHING AT ALL.

THE SEC HAS FOUND NOTHING ILLEGAL ABOUT QBID. QBID IS A START-UP NETWORK LISTED ON THE PINKSHEETS AND ARE DOING EVERYTHING LEGALLY. MAKING PROMISES THAT SEEM TO NOT HAPPEN IS COMMON IN ANY BUSINESS.

POINT HERE IS THAT THE SEC WOULD HAVE CAUGHT SOMETHING AND WE WOULD HAVE BEEN NOTIFIED OR THE STOCK WOULD NOT BE EXISTING.

QBID IS REAL AND THE POTENTIAL IS PRICELESS.
FRANK WON'T STOP UNTIL WE'RE ALL MILLIONAIRES.

posted September 14, 2004 18:26            

Sure hope someone does--yuk on reading through all of that again.

I looked at the satelite chart early this morning.

QTV, and it is listed as QTV, now has a letter "A" (like the other networks) in the box that had been empty as of last week.

posted September 14, 2004 18:39            

"QBID IS REAL AND THE POTENTIAL IS PRICELESS."
"FRANK WON'T STOP UNTIL WE'RE ALL MILLIONAIRES."

"ENJOY THE RIDE AND BE SMART!"

And if anyone has the dicipline to wait this thing out you will realise hugr profits.

I'll be here!

"All we ever had to do is launch!"

------------------
whizknock

posted September 14, 2004 18:53            

Hi Whiz. Good to read that again!
Goodnight Firefly--good dreams--$$$$$$!

posted September 14, 2004 18:54            

quote:

---

Originally posted by sunny:
In all fairness, I don't think people who post here get upset about reading posts that are unflattering to QBID...I post both positives and negatives...never been shy about ranting and raving about Frank.

However, I do think it is the MANNER in which negativity is dished out that riles people up...for the most part, this is a really good board...people are smart, funny, creative and enthusiastic...most are willing to read both sides...it's just the overboard, and excessive negativity that get's under everyone's skin....of course, that's just my opinion...

---

I agree 100%, sunny! It's not about negative vs. positive, it's about blatant, mistruth negativity.

Everyone wants to see positives instead of negatives, but you learn to view both and make your decisions. That's why I don't understand all of the time spent "protecting" us by bashing.

posted September 14, 2004 18:54            

quote:

---

Originally posted by CashRules:
What are the chances that in October Frank will say they will air in December? Not bashing just curious.

---

CashRules. It is definately October for the Rollout for the Rest of the COUNTRY.

posted September 14, 2004 18:55            

Anyone know anything about that show?

posted September 14, 2004 19:09            

quote:

---

Originally posted by kommoncents:
I VOTE WE CHANGE IT TO "SEND $10 DOLLARS TO ME VIA PAY PAL BECAUSE I'M A LOUSY A&M GRADUATE WITH SHEEPSKING THAT AIN'T WORTH A DAMN SO I GOT TO SCAM $10 FROM EVERYONE FOR A "NEW CAMERA" AT THE NCTA CONVENTION.

---

LMAO! You beat me to it kommoncents! I was just gonna go there! For the record, everyone, those people did NOT get what they paid for.

I seem to remember promises of a report to accompany the few pictures that surfaced, but it never materialized. Instead, what they got was a bogus claim of "I didn't have time to type it up before everything became obsolete" (I paraphrased, but used quotes just for effect).

I also see that U4 is still using ALL CAPS to try and feel important.... or to compensate for other shortcomings. In either case, don't fall for his hidden (yet obvious) agenda.

posted September 14, 2004 19:17            

quote:

---

Originally posted by brandwilliams:
Gonna ask again since I got no response. I keep hearing advertisers this advertisers that. We are waiting for and needing advertisers. My question is, what pay channel has advertisers? There are none, thats why you pay extra for the channel. They make their money off your subscription to their channel. There are no commercials or advertisers on any pay channels I have ever seen....???

Brandon

---

posted September 14, 2004 19:17            

The satelite link was not the main page to headlines--it will redirect in 15 seconds to the main page. Then click headlines. Scroll down to QTV N.

Our logo is not on the chart yet, but. . . .
clicking on QTV N took me directly to QTN's homepage!!!!!

Go QBID$$$$$$

posted September 14, 2004 19:35            

So lets carry on from here and stop with the $10 complaints. I waist more then that on beers. you sent the money freely and he did what he said he would do. It's a little to late to complain about your $10 now. Thanks for what you did that day Chuck. I for one have no bad feelings towards you.

Rod

quote:

---

Originally posted by $CashMaker$:
Last response for you, from me.

Did this post you just placed, make you feel better? Did it accomplish anything for you? Did it make you feel good?

Funny,
Chuck

And for your info, I didn't scam nothing, the majority of the people that sent funds, got the info they needed and made money from it. I know, it was just Kommencents that made you post that.

Thanks and THE END

[QUOTE]Originally posted by kommoncents:
[b] I VOTE WE CHANGE IT TO "SEND $10 DOLLARS TO ME VIA PAY PAL BECAUSE I'M A LOUSY A&M GRADUATE WITH SHEEPSKING THAT AIN'T WORTH A DAMN SO I GOT TO SCAM $10 FROM EVERYONE FOR A "NEW CAMERA" AT THE NCTA CONVENTION.

---

[This message has been edited by $CashMaker$ (edited September 14, 2004).][/B][/QUOTE]

posted September 14, 2004 20:00            

quote:

---

Originally posted by pharmdman:
LMAO! You beat me to it kommoncents! I was just gonna go there! For the record, everyone, those people did NOT get what they paid for.

I seem to remember promises of a report to accompany the few pictures that surfaced, but it never materialized. Instead, what they got was a bogus claim of "I didn't have time to type it up before everything became obsolete" (I paraphrased, but used quotes just for effect).

I also see that U4 is still using ALL CAPS to try and feel important.... or to compensate for other shortcomings. In either case, don't fall for his hidden (yet obvious) agenda.

P.S. this message is just for U4 ---- it's 'nada' (as in, Spanish for 'nothing'), not 'notta' (as in, well.. it doesn't have a meaning since it's not a word).

---

posted September 14, 2004 20:25            

quote:

---

Originally posted by firefly:
Hi Suz, Thanks for the post, as I said before,, some people have their own agenda. http://www.lyngsat.com/ia7.html
Have Fun!

---

Daaaaaaaamn!

Hell of scam when you got a uplink & all.

"All we ever had to do is launch!"

posted September 14, 2004 20:30            

quote:

---

Originally posted by $CashMaker$:
Last response for you, from me.

Did this post you just placed, make you feel better? Did it accomplish anything for you? Did it make you feel good?

Funny,
Chuck

And for your info, I didn't scam nothing, the majority of the people that sent funds, got the info they needed and made money from it. I know, it was just Kommencents that made you post that.

Thanks and THE END

---

I guess I was one of the ones who didn't get anything other than what was posted. I remember being promised an email with details you didn't feel you wanted to post even though I gave you my email address.

posted September 14, 2004 20:35            

quote:

---

Originally posted by brandwilliams:
Gonna ask again since I got no response. I keep hearing advertisers this advertisers that. We are waiting for and needing advertisers. My question is, what pay channel has advertisers? There are none, thats why you pay extra for the channel. They make their money off your subscription to their channel. There are no commercials or advertisers on any pay channels I have ever seen....???

Brandon

---

I paid extra for ESPN on C-Band and they have tons of commercials. I'm sure if I wanted to research it more I could come up with others.

posted September 14, 2004 20:50            

The reasons I hold remain the same. I can not lose!!! Broadcasting National TV Networks do not trade for less than $1 a share regardless of O/S!!! Our target audience has HALF A TRILLION DOLLARS of disposable income!!!

Last but not least,,,

"All we ever had to do is launch!"

posted September 14, 2004 20:54            

Like I said,,,

"All they ever had to do is launch!"