posted September 14, 2004 09:52            

REPOST,By: weid ARE WE ON IN SANFRAN PEOPLE?
13 Sep 2004, 09:13 PM EDT
Msg. 548974 of 548987
Jump to msg. #
Hey, Just talked to a friend of mine in San Fran. 255 is Q.He don't have it but will get it for one month. He said its 7.95 a month and I have to pay him back. What a cheap focker!! I got all kinds of crap about it being a gay channel seeing I am not. Boy,Did he give me the chit. But He will check it out. Did not know when it came on line either, but it is there. Said they have been advertising it. He told me he would not invest in a company that has anything to do with gays but I guess that's his problem. I told him I think its a good play. He told me I'm nuts for playing penny stocks in the first place. But I still like this one. I hope this is a great play so I can prove Him wrong again!!

posted September 14, 2004 10:04            

quote:

---

Originally posted by suzainiee:
Hope for what, Robin?????
What are those true intentions and hopes--convincing shareholders to sell low?

---

No, hope that not everyone here is a gullible fool who is willing to believe every pumper touting riches for all as they watch their account dwindle. Find a spot where I've told anyone to sell please. All I've ever done is provide a more realistic interpretation of the facts. So far I've been right every time. I was right about the highest the pps would go so far, I was right about the number and nature of the delays we'd see, I was right about not believing there actually would be a media blitz, I was right about predicting that we never would see an accurate share count, I was right that we wouldn't be filing with the SEC anytime soon, I was right in thinking their appearance at the convention wouldn't provide much, if any, boost in pps (it dropped), I was right in thinking the gay community wouldn't take notice, I was right in thinking the first IBZT delay wouldn't be the last, and I was right that TSBB was a pump and dump scam.

So you tell me, when have our magical pumpers ever been right? Did we see .50 during the convention? Did we see $1 when they 'launched'? Did Rosie O'Donnel actually show up as a spokesperson? Is IBZT trading at $2? Did TSBB turn out to be a "nine bagger"??

quote:

---

Surely you didn't expect anyone to fall for that concern for others fairytale or that you had nothing else to do over the weekend.

---

What's funny about this is that it's the absolute simple truth and yet you are incapable of believing it. However, you're perfectly willing to believe fairy tale predictions of 100,000% returns by summer.

quote:

---

Until October, we can be very sure of one thing from you--more tedious, sanctimonious preemptive strikes before each completed step of the way.

---

Each 'completed' step of the way? Sorry but I must have missed a few of those......share count, buyback information, SEC filing, media blitz, launch....

quote:

---

When your posts appear--good things seem to be around the corner.

---

Excellent investment strategy. Wait for the curmudgeon to show up, the pps is sure to go up now! And look! An unsolicited fax!!! Yay! And another unsolicited fax telling me that I too can add 3-4" in a matter of weeks, all naturally too! I love these faxes!

posted September 14, 2004 10:05            

Any other opinions as to why this seems strange?

posted September 14, 2004 10:11            

LMAO!!!!!!

-chuck

quote:

---

Originally posted by RobinO:
Excellent investment strategy. Wait for the curmudgeon to show up, the pps is sure to go up now! And look! An unsolicited fax!!! Yay! And another unsolicited fax telling me that I too can add 3-4" in a matter of weeks, all naturally too! I love these faxes!

-R

---

posted September 14, 2004 10:13            

quote:

---

Originally posted by $CashMaker$:
This is so Freaking Funny, hehheh

LMAO!!!!!!

-chuck

---

SOME MEN DON'T NEED THE EXTRA THREE OR FOUR INCHES...WE WERE BORN WITH "PLENTY OF STROKE" AND DON'T HAVE TO BASH AND WHINE TO MAKE UP FOR "SHORT COMINGS."

posted September 14, 2004 10:55            

THIS HAS NOW BEEN SET BACK TO OCTOBER.

Updated: 10:32 AM EDT
Q Television Network Launch Announcement

PALM SPRINGS, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--09/08/2004--Frank Olsen announced today that Q Television Network has solved the technical problems that prevented it from launching the Network on September 4, 2004. With assistance of RCN, Network Teleport Systems and Firestone Communications, Q Television Network will be on the air September 8, 2004.

Frank Olsen announced today that despite a gigantic effort by the staffs of RCN and Q Television Network, technical difficulties between the uplink facility in New Orleans and the operating units Of RCN caused the launch of Q Television Network to be delayed by a few days. The launch which was scheduled for 12.57 P.M., September 4, 2004 will be restarted as soon as these difficulties are worked out. Q television has received assurances from all parties concerned that it will be “up” before the end of next week.

quote:

---

Originally posted by sunny:
Wonder why Frank will not put out a formal pr announcing this milestone. Would be an excellent press release.

---

posted September 14, 2004 10:58            

2. FRANK OLSEN HAS RELEASED CONTINOUS PR WHICH WILL STATE INFO SUCH AS "THINGS TO COME" OR "THINGS ARE GOING GREAT". WE ARE GIVEN SPECIFICS SUCH AS WE'LL TELL YOU NEXT WEEK, ETC. ONLY TO NEVER SUCH ANY OF THE INFORMATION MATERALIZE.

3. THERE IS NO 10-YEAR DEAL WITH TIME WARNER. WE WERE TOLD THERE IS BUT THERE ISN'T. WE WERE TOLD WE WERE GIVEN A HUNTING LICENSE BUT THIS IS MISLEADING ON IT'S FACE AND BOTTOM LINE, THERE IS NO DEAL WITH TIME WARNER.

4. WE WERE TOLD THAT THE "SOFT" LAUNCH WAS TO BEGIN ON A CERTAIN DATE. A PRESS RELEASE WAS GIVEN GIVING A DIFFERENT DATE. THE STOCK PRICE PLUMMETED FROM .012+ TO .005 IN ABOUT 30 MINUTES AFTER THAT PRESS RELEASE. I AS WELL AS MANY OTHERS FILED S.E.C. COMPLAINTS AND FRANK ISSUED A PR IMMEDIATELY AT 3PM WHICH CORRECTED THE MIS-INFORMATION AND THE STOCK PRICE ROSE BACK UP TO .011+.

5. WE ARE TOLD IN A PRESS RELEASE THAT WE HAVE SECURED FINANCING TO SECURE 5-YEARS OF BROADCAST. FEW WEEKS LATER, ANOTHER PR WAS DONE REFERENCING A $2 MILLION DOLLAR INVESTMENT FROM A MAJOR INVESTMENT FIRM BUT THE "FIRM" IS NEVER IDENTIFIED WITH THE OPTION OF $1 MILLION DOLLAR LOAN WHICH HAS SECURED OUR BROADCAST. FOLLOWED JUST RECENTLY THAT WE OBTAINED A $1 MILLION DOLLARS WHICH HAS SECURED OUR 1ST YEAR BROADCAST.

6. WE HIRED A CERTAIN INDIVIDUAL (Michael Markovsky) WHO WAS GOING TO ASSIST WITH HIS BACKGROUND IN TELEVISION ONLY TO DISCOVER HE WAS SUBJECT TO 2 FAILED TELEVISION STATIONS AND A FRAUD INDICTMENT. FRANK STATED HE LEARNED MORE FROM THIS GUY IN 1-DAY THEN IN THE PAST 5-YEARS FROM EVERYONE ELSE. WELL LET'S SAY THIS GUY WAS SO VERY KNOWLEDGABLE, WHY ISN'T HE STILL AROUND?

7. FRANK POSTS THAT WE HAVE 100,000 CALLS PER A 2-MONTH PERIOD ON THE 800 HOTLINE AND IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR 100,000 CALLS TO HAVE TAKEN PLACE VIA THE HOTLINE.

8. WE HAVE A "DEAL" WITH NETWORK TELEPORTS TO TEST OUR SOFT LAUNCH ON C-BAND (BIG SATELLITE DISHES) AND WE SEEN 1-PROGRAM WITH 2 OTHERS REPORTED FOR THE ENTIRE TIME THIS "SOFT" LAUNCH TOOK PLACE. FURTHER, SHORTLY THEREAFTER, THE SIGNAL COULD NOT BE FOUND.

9. WE BOAST BARBARA LAMONT WHO IS PRESIDENT OF NETWORK TELEPORTS AT ONE TIME TO PUSH OUR SIGNAL AND WE HAVE NO NETWORK TELEPORTS TO DATE. FURTHER, NETWORK TELEPORTS IS DELEGATED FOR THE TELECONFERENCING AND PRIVATE SECTOR, NOT THE PUBLIC SECTOR FOR THE GENERAL PUBLIC.

10. WE ARE TOLD THAT THE LOCAL WORK FOR Q-TV SHALL BE "SUB-CONTRACTED" OUT TO THE LOCAL STATIONS WHERE NEWS IS HAPPENING. TO DATE, NOT A SINGLE LOCAL NETWORK HAS BEEN RETAINED.

11. WE ARE TOLD Q-MOBILES AND THIS IS ANOTHER LIE.

12. REGARDING OUR "SOFT" LAUNCH, THIS WAS FOR VIEWING BY THE ADVERTISERS TO SEE WHAT Q-TV IS ALL ABOUT. FURTHER, NOT A SINGLE ADVERTISERS HAS BEEN CONTRACTED. THE ONLY EXCEPTION IS A FEW WEB-PAGE ADS ON THE Q-TV WEBSITE AND OF THOSE ADVERTISERS, THEY BRING NO CREDIBILITY TO Q-TV AS A "REAL" STATION.

13. RCN, THE CARRIER OF CHOICE HAS 500,000 OR LESS SUBSCRIBERS, IS IN BANKRUPTCY, HAS A RECORDED HISTORY OF PROMOTING STATIONS IT DOES NOT POSSESS AND HAS A 2.2 MILLION DOLLAR JUDGEMENT AGAINST THEM. THEY HAD TO SELL PARTS OF THEIR CUSTOMERS TO BRING UP CASH. THEIR STOCK IS DOWN FROM $70 TO PENNIES WITH 7,000 EMPLOYEE'S REDUCED TO LESS THAN 2,000.

14. THE ABSOLUTE ONLY CONFIRMATION WE HAVE ABOUT Q-TV IS RCN WHICH IS A FINANCIAL MESS ITSELF.

15. WITH ALL THE HOOPLA GOING ON IN THE MEDIA REGARDING GAYS/MARRIAGE, WE HAVE NOT A OUNCE OF EVIDENCE REGARDING Q-TV. ALL THE WAY FROM YOUR MAJOR CHRISTIAN ORGANIZATIONS TO THE PRESIDENT AND CONGRESS AND NOT A PEEP ABOUT Q-TV.

16. RCN, THE MAJOR AND FIRST CARRIER OF OUR "SIGNAL" HAS NOT A SINGLE SHRED OF EVIDENCE ON THEIR WEBSITE. THEY DO HAVE INFO REGARDING THE VIDEO GAME SPLINTCELL BUT NOTHING, ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ABOUT Q-TV.

17. WE NOW HAVE ANOTHER DELAY BEING OVER THE NEXT 45 DAYS WE WILL ROLL OUT 10% AND 20% PROGRAMMING. WELL WHAT ABOUT THE OTHER 70% AND FURTHER, WHO THE HECK IS GOING TO SUBSCRIBE TO Q-TV FOR $7.95/MONTH WHEN RCN IS TELLING NO ONE ABOUT IT, THEY HAVE NO INFO ON THEIR WEBSITE ABOUT IT AND IF SOMEONE DOES ASK, Q-TV IS NOT A "REAL" STATION DUE TO THEY ARE "ROLLING OUT" OVER THE NEXT 45-DAYS.

18. THE ONLY PEOPLE FOR THE MOST PART WHO KNOW ABOUT Q-TV ARE THOSE OF YOU RIGHT HERE ON A MESSAGE BOARD. 250,000 HITS ON THE Q WEBSITE ARE FROM THOSE OF YOU CHECKING OUT TO SEE IT. THE GENERAL PUBLIC KNOWS NOTTA ABOUT Q-TV.

19. WE HAVE NOT ONE SINGLE AD IN ANY MAJOR PUBLICATION PROCLAIMING THE GOOD NEWS ABOUT Q-TELEVISION. GENERAL MOTORS, AMERICAN EXPRESS AND THE COUNTLESS OTHERS OUT THERE IN YOUR MAJOR GAY MAGAZINES ARE ADVERTISING BUT THE LANDMARK Q-TELEVISION, LEADING THE WAY INTO THE 21ST CENTURY WITH GAY TV ISNT' IN THERE?

20. WE HAVE SPECIAL INCENTIVES FOR ADVERTISERS WITH Q-TV FOR THE FIRST YEAR. DAY 1 OF "BROADCAST" AND GUESS WHAT, NOT A SINGLE ADVERTISER. IT'S ONLY BEEN 3 MONTHS OR SO FOR THEM TO FIND SOME ADVERTISERS BUT WE HAVE NONE.

21. WE HAVE PEOPLE ON THE MESSAGE BOARD CALLING RCN AND BEING TOLD THAT Q-TV WONT BE BROADCASTING UNTIL OCTOBER.
crosseyed
Member posted September 09, 2004 14:55
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ok I just called RCN at 1-800-746-4726 and asked if Q Television Network was on the air yet and if so where... the lady came back and said "actually we are not going to be airing Q television until early Oct."

22. WE HAVE A "MAJOR" ANNOUNCEMENT REGARDING PICKING UP A FEW FLICKS FROM WARNER BRO'S. WELL 2 WERE NEVER RELEASED AND 3 WERE FLOPS. BUT WE ARE TOLD THEY ARE SOME OF THE GREATEST MOVIES OF ALL TIME. PRIOR TO THIS, WE ARE TOLD WE HAVE 2-ROOMS FULL OF PROGRAMMING.

23. FRANK TELLS US VIA PR THAT 50,000 INQUIRES HAVE COME ABOUT REGARDING Q-TV. WELL FOLKS, IT IS IMPOSSIBLE FOR Q-TV TO HANDLE 50,000 INQUIRIES AND WITH THE SMALL STAFF THEY DO HAVE, THEY MIGHT BE ABLE TO HANDLE 300 INQUIRIES. FURTHER, REMEMBER THAT WE HAD 100,000 HOTLINE CALLS FOR THE SAKE OF THIS I'LL SAY HAPPENED WHEN I KNOW THEY NEVER DID TAKE PLACE, BUT BETWEEN THE 50,000 INQUIRIES AND THE 100,000 PHONE CALLS, WELL THERE IS YOUR 150,000 FIRST YEAR CUSTOMERS. TOO BAD IT'S ALL A MAJOR LIE; THERE IS NO 50,000 INQUIRIES AND THERE IS NO 100,000 HOTLINE CALLS.

24. WE ARE TOLD ABOUT A NY CITY OFFICE WHILE THERE IS NO FILINGS WITH NY CITY FOR OCCUPATIONAL LICENSES OR ANY OTHER BUSINESS LICENSES FOR OPERATION IN NY CITY FOR Q-TELEVISION. THERE IS NO PHONE NUMBER AND NOTHING ON 411. ADDITIONALLY, NO OFFICE IS NEEDED IN NY CITY SINCE WE ARE LOCATED IN PALM SPRINGS, CA. REGARDLESS, THE NY CITY OFFICE DOESN'T EXIST. I CAN PUT A Q-TV SIGN ON MY CONDO DOOR BUT IT DOESN'T MEAN Q-TV IS LOCATED IN TAMPA BAY FLORIDA.

25. FRANK TELLS US THAT EXECUTIVES HAVE MADE GREAT INROADS IN FIRMING UP NETWORK CARRIAGE AND MAKING NEW APPOINTMENTS FOR CARRIAGE. NOPE, WE GOT RCN WHICH IS A FINANCIAL MESS.

26. WE HAVE A HOTLINE TO TAKE CALLS TO UPDATE SHAREHOLDERS WHICH IS NO LONGER USED.

27. A MAGIC MESSAGE APPEARS ON THE Q-TV WEBSITE TELLING US THE Q-TV OFFICES ARE MOVING ONLY TO SHORTLY HAVE THAT INFORMATION REMOVED.

posted September 14, 2004 11:33            

quote:

---

Originally posted by GatorMan:
So, RobinO, just WHAT would you have people here and on the other boards you've posted supposed to do? Are you trying to say "stay away from the pinks"? Are you trying to say "don't beleive any of the positive things posted"? Are you saying "you are all idiots because you can't or refuse to see what I see"? And why do you care? I'm just curious as to YOUR motivation in all this.

---

RobinO,and since this is a stock board and you are so concerned about us, tell us about the sucessful stocks you are in and making money on.

posted September 14, 2004 11:47            

There are a few people in this world, that has a since of Humor and I thought the remark that Robin-O made was funny, whether it had to do with stocks or not.

A few of yall are taking things to damm serious here and need to get a life.

Geeeesh,
Chuck

quote:

---

Originally posted by kommoncents:

SOME MEN DON'T NEED THE EXTRA THREE OR FOUR INCHES...WE WERE BORN WITH "PLENTY OF STROKE" AND DON'T HAVE TO BASH AND WHINE TO MAKE UP FOR "SHORT COMINGS."

---

posted September 14, 2004 11:51            

You been to your uncles(Adolph) dentist lately to fix those (ONLY) 2-two teeeeth you have left in the front of your mouth?

posted September 14, 2004 12:04            

3. THERE IS NO 10-YEAR DEAL WITH TIME WARNER. WE WERE TOLD THERE IS BUT THERE ISN'T. WE WERE TOLD WE WERE GIVEN A HUNTING LICENSE BUT THIS IS MISLEADING ON IT'S FACE AND BOTTOM LINE, THERE IS NO DEAL WITH TIME WARNER.

How do you know this? I've seen no evidence that there is NOT a deal.

8. WE HAVE A "DEAL" WITH NETWORK TELEPORTS TO TEST OUR SOFT LAUNCH ON C-BAND (BIG SATELLITE DISHES) AND WE SEEN 1-PROGRAM WITH 2 OTHERS REPORTED FOR THE ENTIRE TIME THIS "SOFT" LAUNCH TOOK PLACE. FURTHER, SHORTLY THEREAFTER, THE SIGNAL COULD NOT BE FOUND.

I was able to witness some of the "soft" launch on C-Band, which was later termed a "test", if this is what you are refering to My reception wan't good but I think that was problems on my side since others reported seeing the signal sent to the few cable carriers that aired the test. I recall there being at least two programs, a movie and the documentary. That signal could not be found later because the test was only for about 5 hours, I think.

10. WE ARE TOLD THAT THE LOCAL WORK FOR Q-TV SHALL BE "SUB-CONTRACTED" OUT TO THE LOCAL STATIONS WHERE NEWS IS HAPPENING. TO DATE, NOT A SINGLE LOCAL NETWORK HAS BEEN RETAINED.

And you know this, how?

11. WE ARE TOLD Q-MOBILES AND THIS IS ANOTHER LIE.

Again, how do you know this is a lie?

12. REGARDING OUR "SOFT" LAUNCH, THIS WAS FOR VIEWING BY THE ADVERTISERS TO SEE WHAT Q-TV IS ALL ABOUT. FURTHER, NOT A SINGLE ADVERTISERS HAS BEEN CONTRACTED. THE ONLY EXCEPTION IS A FEW WEB-PAGE ADS ON THE Q-TV WEBSITE AND OF THOSE ADVERTISERS, THEY BRING NO CREDIBILITY TO Q-TV AS A "REAL" STATION.

True, we've not been told of any advertisers, but how does that prove we have not contracted any?

18. THE ONLY PEOPLE FOR THE MOST PART WHO KNOW ABOUT Q-TV ARE THOSE OF YOU RIGHT HERE ON A MESSAGE BOARD. 250,000 HITS ON THE Q WEBSITE ARE FROM THOSE OF YOU CHECKING OUT TO SEE IT. THE GENERAL PUBLIC KNOWS NOTTA ABOUT Q-TV.

While I suspect this is mostly true, we really have no way of telling exactly where the hits come from.

20. WE HAVE SPECIAL INCENTIVES FOR ADVERTISERS WITH Q-TV FOR THE FIRST YEAR. DAY 1 OF "BROADCAST" AND GUESS WHAT, NOT A SINGLE ADVERTISER. IT'S ONLY BEEN 3 MONTHS OR SO FOR THEM TO FIND SOME ADVERTISERS BUT WE HAVE NONE.

See my response to #12.

22. WE HAVE A "MAJOR" ANNOUNCEMENT REGARDING PICKING UP A FEW FLICKS FROM WARNER BRO'S. WELL 2 WERE NEVER RELEASED AND 3 WERE FLOPS. BUT WE ARE TOLD THEY ARE SOME OF THE GREATEST MOVIES OF ALL TIME. PRIOR TO THIS, WE ARE TOLD WE HAVE 2-ROOMS FULL OF PROGRAMMING.

As I posted before, the PR does not say that the "flicks" listed are the only ones QTN got. The way I read it they are just a sample of what we got. I can't attest to the quality since I don't think I ever saw any of them.

25. FRANK TELLS US THAT EXECUTIVES HAVE MADE GREAT INROADS IN FIRMING UP NETWORK CARRIAGE AND MAKING NEW APPOINTMENTS FOR CARRIAGE. NOPE, WE GOT RCN WHICH IS A FINANCIAL MESS.

We don't know this is not the case since we've not been told any details.

26. WE HAVE A HOTLINE TO TAKE CALLS TO UPDATE SHAREHOLDERS WHICH IS NO LONGER USED.

And this proves, what? Maybe they decided that PRs were a better way to go so as to not risk giving out insider information.

posted September 14, 2004 12:15            

I am not touching or trying to step on any toes. But if you step back and notice each of your responses.

Its the major issue at hand.

WE OR THE INVESTORS KNOWS OF NOTHING AND HAS NOT BEEN INFORMED OF NOTHING THAT HAS BEEN DOCUMENTED or VALIDATED.

Thats the issue at hand. If and when QBID brings on the TRUTH and VALIDATION. Then the game will begin.

Good luck to all investors and make the money when possible.

posted September 14, 2004 12:35            

quote:

---

Originally posted by $CashMaker$:
Hey Gator,

I am not touching or trying to step on any toes. But if you step back and notice each of your responses.

Its the major issue at hand.

WE OR THE INVESTORS KNOWS OF NOTHING AND HAS NOT BEEN INFORMED OF NOTHING THAT HAS BEEN DOCUMENTED or VALIDATED.

Thats the issue at hand. If and when QBID brings on the TRUTH and VALIDATION. Then the game will begin.

Good luck to all investors and make the money when possible.

-Chuck

---

I think understand what you are saying. All I'm saying is don't say things like "THERE IS NO DEAL WITH TIME WARNER." or "NOT A SINGLE ADVERTISERS HAS BEEN CONTRACTED". Say "there is no evidence that there is still a deal with Time Warner" or "we have not been told of any advertisers that have been contracted." See what I mean? U4 is stating something as fact for which we have no evidence one way or another. That is just as misleading as what he is accusing other posters of doing.

I will admit that we as the investors are entitled to TRUTHFUL and ACCURATE information from any company we invest in and that QBID, as well as most pink sheet companies, like to really hype things in their PRs. But if we are going to criticize the company for bad, misleading, or contrary information we should expect to be held to the same scrutiny for what we say.

posted September 14, 2004 12:49            

Sincerely,

posted September 14, 2004 12:51            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Trader O:
Just got confirmation from Jim Downing at RCN that Q is on channel 255 in SF. Anyone can confirm this by emailing Mr. Downing at Investor Relations <Investor.Relations@rcn.net>
-----------
Yes, that is true- sorry I didn't inform you about this yesterday. Our SF
market has launched QTV on channel 255. Other markets still slated for an
October 1 launch date.

Sincerely,

Jim Downing
RCN

---

posted September 14, 2004 13:00            

HUM....

ISN'T THAT UP 27,000% FROM ABOUT 10 WEEKS AGO?

NOW QBID DROPS TO .014 TODAY

HUM....

ISN'T THAT ------>UP<------ 14,000% FROM A 10 WEEKS AGO? THAT DOESN'T MAKE MUCH SENSE THAT THE STOCK CAN ----->DROP<----- AND STILL HAVE RISEN 14,000%.

FURTHER, THE STOCK ----->DROPS<----- TO .014 AND TRADES $6 MILLION PLUS DOLLARS.

HUM....

WELL U4TSAF2, I GOT IN AT .018.

YEA U4TSAF2, I GOT IN AT .019.

ME 2 U4TSAF2, I GOT IN AT .01

SO THAT DOESN'T APPLY TO US. YOU JUST GOT LUCKY AND BOUGHT IN EARLIER THAN THE REST OF US.

WE GUESS WHAT:

U4TSAF2 BOUGHT ANOTHER 2 MIL ON TOP OF WHAT HE ALREADY HAD AT .02.

BOY, WHEN THE STOCK HITS .25 YOU CAN TELL EVERYONE WHO GOT IN AT .20 AFTER IT DROPS TO .13 THE STORY I'M GIVING YOU RIGHT HERE.

MARCH 3, 2006

L2 QBID

4X4.00
3X3.99
6X3.98
7X3.97

RESISTANCE IS AT $4.00 AND IF WE CAN GET THROUGH THAT THE SKY'S THE LIMIT

posted September 14, 2004 13:16            

quote:

---

Originally posted by anonymous_lurker:

Thanks for information.
I sent my question also- will post reply.

---

posted September 14, 2004 13:24            

BUT THIS IS A BUSINESS CALL AND I SEE THE EFFORT AND REASONING BEHIND IT.

DUCKS IN A ROW AND JUST ON RUMOR ALONE, THE GAY/LESBIAN "COMMUNITY" WILL KNAW AT THE BIT TO SUBSCRIBE TO THIS. CONSTANT CONDOM COMMERCIALS AND I WONDER WHAT THEY WILL BE LIKE.

.0014 ENTRY WITH $1,500,000 CASH TRADED ON FRIDAY. I SEE THIS NO DIFFERENTLY THAN THE CURRENT RUN OF GZFX (FORMERLY PGHI: VEEGEES.COM) UP FROM A LOW AKIN TO .0014 TO CURRENTLY .10.

********************************************

U4TSAF2
Member posted February 08, 2004 00:36
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
QBID ABOUT TO LAUNCH.
CURRENT STOCK PRICE AS OF FRIDAY IS .0014. 100% UP FROM .0007 WITH READY FOR THIS:

ONE MILLION FIVE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS.

$1,000 AT .0014 IS 714,285 SHARES.

714,285 SHARES AT .01 IS $71,428.00.

I BELIEVE IT PREVIOUSLY HIT .03 AND NOT .30.

BUY YOUR $1,000 WORTH AND PUT YOUR LIMIT ORDER IN TO SELL AT THE SAME TIME FOR .01 THEN FORGET ABOUT IT AND ONE DAY WONDER WHERE THAT EXTRA 70 GRAND CAME FROM!

********************************************

U4TSAF2
Member posted February 09, 2004 20:22
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WELL THAT IS ANYONE'S GUESS HERE TIM.
WHEN'S IT GOING TO GO DOWN IS LIKE ASKING WHEN IT'S GOING TO GO UP.

.0029 HIGH FOR TODAY. THAT IS UP FROM .000WHATEVER JUST LAST WEEK. LAST WEEK NOTTA WITH THIS COMPANY AND OUT OF THE BLUE, HELLO, WE ARE ABOUT TO BROADCAST.

THE ABSOLUTE MAJORITY BELIEVES HERE THIS STOCK IS GOING TO CONTINUE TO RISE AND THE SMALL % OF US ARE HOLDING LONG BEYOND THE .01!

EVEN IF THIS STOCK TANKS TOMORROW I'M STILL WHISTLING AND SINGIN ALL THE WAY TO THE BANK IN TIME.

SO MY OPINION IS THAT IT WILL CONTINUE TO RISE, FALL SOME, GAIN SOME MORE, FALL AGAIN, UP AGAIN AND DOWN ONCE MORE.

ALL THE TIME I'LL HAVE MY LIMIT ORDER IN AT $2.00.

********************************************

U4TSAF2
Member posted April 13, 2004 10:42
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BID
3X.0076
4X.0075
3X.0074
4X.0073

ASK

2X.0075
2X.0076
1X.0077
3X.0078

THIS IS CLOSE CAUSE I CAN'T CUT AND PASTE L2 AND THE L2 IS QUICKLY CHANGING UP AND DOWN

********************************************

U4TSAF2
Member posted March 20, 2004 02:16
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
GOTO MICRO PENNIES UNDER .10 AND READ THE QBID POST FOR TONS OF GOOD INFO.

********************************************

THIS IS WHERE U4 HAD BOUGHT IN WHICH HAS BEEN THE CATALYST FOR HIM TO BE A LITTLE BITCH...

U4TSAF2
Member posted May 03, 2004 09:37
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
BID
3X.018
1X.0179
2X.0178
2X.0177
2X.0176
2X.0175

ASK

2X.0181
2X.0184
1X.0185
3X.0186

09:36:57 250000 0.018 - OTCEQ_NBB
09:36:51 205000 0.0181 + OTCEQ_NBB
09:36:48 250000 0.018 - OTCEQ_NBB
09:35:09 500000 0.0181 + OTCEQ_NBB
09:34:21 40000 0.018 - OTCEQ_NBB
09:33:57 100000 0.0181 + OTCEQ_NBB
09:33:48 500000 0.018 - OTCEQ_NBB
09:33:27 746260 0.0181 + OTCEQ_NBB
09:33:24 100000 0.0181 + OTCEQ_NBB
09:33:12 100000 0.0181 + OTCEQ_NBB
09:33:09 186593 0.018 - OTCEQ_NBB
09:33:00 13000 0.0181 + OTCEQ_NBB
09:32:48 50000 0.018 - OTCEQ_NBB
09:32:45 125000 0.018 - OTCEQ_NBB
09:32:45 100000 0.018 - OTCEQ_NBB
09:32:45 85000 0.0181 + OTCEQ_NBB
09:32:45 20000 0.0181 + OTCEQ_NBB
09:32:45 20000 0.0181 + OTCEQ_NBB
09:32:39 180180 0.018 - OTCEQ_NBB
09:32:39 27472 0.0181 - OTCEQ_NBB
09:32:39 1000 0.0181 - OTCEQ_NBB
09:32:39 205000 0.0181 - OTCEQ_NBB
09:32:39 10000 0.0182 + OTCEQ_NBB
09:32:39 27472 0.0182 + OTCEQ_NBB

********************************************

U4TSAF2
Member posted May 04, 2004 14:38
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MARCH 3, 2006
L2 QBID

4X4.00
8X3.99
4X3.98
6X3.97

RESISTANCE IS AT $4.00 AND IF WE CAN GET THROUGH THAT THE SKY'S THE LIMIT

U4TSAF2
Member posted May 04, 2004 14:47
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
AT .0143 SOME OF US COULDN'T WAIT AND HAD TO BUY 2 MIL AT .02 WHICH WAS $40,000.
GOSH, IF THAT STUPID PERSON ONLY HAD WAITED, HE COULD HAVE SAVED $12,600.

THAT'S 2 ZX-11'S!

********************************************
U4TSAF2
Member posted May 04, 2004 19:28
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
.0001
.0022

.0032

.01

.018

.015

.013

.027

HE SAID THIS.

THEY SAID THAT.

THIS IS HAPPENING.

THIS AINT HAPPENING.

DID FRANK SAY THIS?

NO FRANK SAID THAT.

I'M DUMPING.

I GOT FREE SHARES.

IT WILL HIT .50

REVERSE SPLIT.

NO REVERSE SPLIT.

WHAT ABOUT THIS?

CAN YOU BELIEVE THAT?

IT'S OVERSOLD.

IT CAN'T HIT .001. OR .005 OR .50 OR 2.00.

STUPID PEOPLE GIVE MONEY TO CASH TO GOTO THE CONVENTION.

MARKET CAP WILL HOLD THE PRICE DOWN.

THEY ARE BROADCASTING.

THEY AREN'T BROADCASTING.

3-YEARS AGO.

SOFT LAUNCH.

FULL LAUNCH.

HORRIBLE PICTURE.

FAKE.

NO TIME WARNER DEAL.

TIME WARNER DEAL.

I'M SO HAPPY MY QBID ISN'T THE SAME ONE YOU GUYS OWN!

MARCH 3, 2006

L2 QBID

4X4.00
3X3.99
6X3.98
9X3.97

RESISTANCE IS AT $4.00 AND IF WE CAN GET THROUGH THAT THE SKY'S THE LIMIT

********************************************

AND LAST BUT DEFINITELY NOT THE LEAST AS THERE ARE A BOAT LOAD...READ THIS ONE...THIS WILL GIVE EVERYONE INSIGHT INTO U4'S REASON TO BASH AND DENIGRATE QBID.....

U4TSAF2
Member posted May 04, 2004 21:49
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LAST TIME I CHECKED SINCE I'M ONE OF THOSE WHO GOT IN ABOUT 7+ OR SO WEEKS AGO:
QBID HIT A HIGH (RECENT) OF .027

HUM....

ISN'T THAT UP 27,000% FROM ABOUT 10 WEEKS AGO?

NOW QBID DROPS TO .014 TODAY

HUM....

ISN'T THAT ------>UP<------ 14,000% FROM A 10 WEEKS AGO? THAT DOESN'T MAKE MUCH SENSE THAT THE STOCK CAN ----->DROP<----- AND STILL HAVE RISEN 14,000%.

FURTHER, THE STOCK ----->DROPS<----- TO .014 AND TRADES $6 MILLION PLUS DOLLARS.

HUM....

WELL U4TSAF2, I GOT IN AT .018.

YEA U4TSAF2, I GOT IN AT .019.

ME 2 U4TSAF2, I GOT IN AT .01

SO THAT DOESN'T APPLY TO US. YOU JUST GOT LUCKY AND BOUGHT IN EARLIER THAN THE REST OF US.

WE GUESS WHAT:

U4TSAF2 BOUGHT ANOTHER 2 MIL ON TOP OF WHAT HE ALREADY HAD AT .02.

BOY, WHEN THE STOCK HITS .25 YOU CAN TELL EVERYONE WHO GOT IN AT .20 AFTER IT DROPS TO .13 THE STORY I'M GIVING YOU RIGHT HERE.

MARCH 3, 2006

L2 QBID

4X4.00
3X3.99
6X3.98
7X3.97

RESISTANCE IS AT $4.00 AND IF WE CAN GET THROUGH THAT THE SKY'S THE LIMIT

posted September 14, 2004 13:55            

quote:

---

Originally posted by kbpkt:
Komm- Obviously his outlooked has changed. All you are showing is that he use to pump the stock and now he "bashes" it. I did the same. I was a huge supporter of QBID and then changed my mind when I believed things were not going the way they were suppose to. I sold and got out. When companies actions change and promises are broken and lies made, people have the right to change their outlook as well. Most of what he is saying is true. Yes, he does exaggerate a few of his reasons, but for the most part he is right about what he is saying. Just because you are totally for a stock one day does not mean you can't change your mind the next, especially in penny stocks. Any other way of thinking is absurd and you are sure to loose money.

---

I LEAST YOU HAVE THE SPINE AND BALLS TO ADMIT YOU WERE A PUMPER AND NOW A BASHER.....WHAT'S U4?? YOU ALSO HAVE TO GIVE CREDENCE THAT IF A STOCK IS SO BAD IN PENNYLAND, WHY THE HELL ARE YOU IN IT? GET AND AND SHUT UP IS MY PHILOSOPHY...UNLESS YOU ARE TRYING TO PICK UP MORE SHARES AT A LOWER PRICE (AKA SHAKE THE TREE). THERE ARE PLENTY OF PEOPLE THAT WAY...U4 IS ONE OF THEM....A POMPOUS KNOW IT ALL STOCK GURU WHO MADE A MISTAKE?? IMPOSSIBLE....THIS HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH RIGHTS AND EVERYTHING TO DO WITH ETHICS AND COMMON SENSE...WHO SPENDS TIME INVESTING IN A LOSING STOCK AND TAKES TIME TO BASH IT CONTINUOUSLY????? BASHING IT ISN'T GOING TO MAKE IT GO UP....JUST LIKE FRANK OLSEN NOT FOLLOWING THROUGH ISN'T GOING TO MAKE IT GO UP. SO MAYBE FRANK OLSEN AND U4 ARE THE SAME.....???? THERE ARE TOO MANY SMALL BUYS AND SELLS GOING ON TO THINK THIS THING ISN'T BEING MANIPULATED....AND WHO KNOWS HOW DEEP U4'S HAND IS IN THE COOKIE JAR??? THIS STOCK HAS MADE ME PLENTY OF MONEY THIS YEAR....AND YES I'M GAMBLING FOR THE SHORT TERM AGAIN WITH ANOTHER 6.75M SHARES....WE ARE AIRING IN SAN FRANCISCO...AND THE REST OF THE COUNTRY IS IN THE PROCESS OF ROLLING OUT....SO, IF THIS QBID STOCK IS SUCH A STINKER, THEN ALL SHOULD GET OUT AND MAKE IT TANK...THE REALITY IS.......THIS STOCK ISN'T A STINKER...WE ARE IN A VERY INVISIBLE MOMENTUM GROWING MODE...AND IN THE NEXT 1-2 WEEKS, WE ARE GOING TO SEE SOME BEAUTIFUL NUMBERS GROWING.....WHAT WILL U4 SAY THEN???

posted September 14, 2004 13:59            

As most people know, take what someone else say's with a grain of salt and do your own DD.

You will be happier with the end result.

Thanks,
Chuck

quote:

---

Originally posted by GatorMan:
I think understand what you are saying. All I'm saying is don't say things like "THERE IS NO DEAL WITH TIME WARNER." or "NOT A SINGLE ADVERTISERS HAS BEEN CONTRACTED". Say "there is no evidence that there is still a deal with Time Warner" or "we have not been told of any advertisers that have been contracted." See what I mean? U4 is stating something as fact for which we have no evidence one way or another. That is just as misleading as what he is accusing other posters of doing.

I will admit that we as the investors are entitled to TRUTHFUL and ACCURATE information from any company we invest in and that QBID, as well as most pink sheet companies, like to really hype things in their PRs. But if we are going to criticize the company for bad, misleading, or contrary information we should expect to be held to the same scrutiny for what we say.

---

posted September 14, 2004 14:07            

quote:

---

Originally posted by U4TSAF2:
U4TSAF2
Member posted September 10, 2004 14:23

---

WELL U4TSAF2, I GOT IN AT .018.

YEA U4TSAF2, I GOT IN AT .019.

ME 2 U4TSAF2, I GOT IN AT .01

posted September 14, 2004 14:11            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Trader O:
Just got confirmation from Jim Downing at RCN that Q is on channel 255 in SF. Anyone can confirm this by emailing Mr. Downing at Investor Relations <Investor.Relations@rcn.net>
-----------
Yes, that is true- sorry I didn't inform you about this yesterday. Our SF
market has launched QTV on channel 255. Other markets still slated for an
October 1 launch date.

Sincerely,

Jim Downing
RCN

---

Robin0,

And what were you doing yesterday while QTV was showing on channel 255?

Oh yeah, you were busy posting your description of QBID shareholders as "fools" and "suckers".

When you show up--good things are just around the corner.

posted September 14, 2004 14:25            

quote:

---

Originally posted by kbpkt:
I use the term "pumper" and "basher" very loosely. I mean pumper in the sense that I believed in the stock and rooted for it. When things in the compnay changed from my point of view, I got out at a very nice profit. It was at that point that I became a "basher" in the sense that I did not support this company and was not posting positive things about it. I let everyone know my opinions about it and moved on. It is in that sense I think you are confused as to what I mean by "pumper" and "basher". I would have loved to have kept "pumping" (posting positive things about the compnay) however, it was at that point that positive things about this company were hard to find. The plethora of negative things emerging was overtaking any DD most people were doing. I do agree with you however that there is no point to sticking around and continually "bashing" the stock. State your point of view and move on. On this board, I do still lurk and very rarely post. That is because since I sold off my investment in QBID, I have still traded it. This stock does have its perks in its volitility, and it is in that, that I still continue to make money in QBID. However, as an investment, I have no faith in this company. I won't get into posting my reasons, been there, done that. I just think it is hilarious that people on this board want to jump all over Robin and U4 for posting what is for the most part, correct.
I do agree that U4 may have some joy in seeing this stock fall, and probably does have alterior motives. However, this stock is not falling because of what U4 and Robin are posting, it is falling because of the incompentance of your CEO Frank Olson. I have posted this before, and will say it again, the best news you guys could get that would send this stock back up is if news came out that Frank Olson was stepping down as CEO as was being replaced by anybody with a sense of business. Even I might consider buying back in as an investment if that were to occur. As for now, I am going back into lurk mode on this thread, but I will be standing by, reading everyday, ready to jump back in at any money making oppurtunity I see. Good luck to everyone.

---

posted September 14, 2004 14:35            

Like I've said repeatedly, Frank needs to heavily promote QTN...publically...press releases, significantly more newspaper ads, magazine features...he needs to hire himself a "Director of Communications" to handle press releases and field phone calls from inquiring minds....This silence tactic is indeed ludicrous...especially with QTN airing in SF. Boggles the mind.

Not bashing at all. Just quite perplexed as to why Frank would intentionally hold back positive public information (press releases.)Enough said.

I'm holding my QBID shares, because the potential to me outweighs the risk right now.

I'm fervently hoping that Frank snaps out of this 'stealth' mode and hires himself a freaking band and cheerleading squad to promote QTN...

posted September 14, 2004 14:53            

quote:

---

Originally posted by sunny:
Mdec--very conservative government for sure...but I'm betting the greed of corporations is more important than touting conservative agendas. I think advertisers, who recognize this is a relatively untapped money well, will jump on board quickly if given the opportunity. Increased revenues for their own companies positively affect their own pps'...Maybe we'll find out soon enough if QTN has advertisers.

Would love for someone in San Fran to write in...and tell us what they are seeing.

---

I WONDER IF GEORGE SOROS IS A STOCKHOLDER....FRANK HAS STATED HE IS VERY UNHAPPY WITH THE DAYTRADERS AND I BELIEVE A LITTLE REVENGE IS IN PLAY...POSSIBLE...KEEPING IT LOW COULD ALSO BE IN PLAY FOR HIM TO BUY BACK MORE SHARES....POSSIBLE....LIKE I SAID, IF THIS WAS SUCH A SCAM, WHY ARE WE NOT BACK TO .0001??? MAYBE FRANK DOESN'T WANT THE EXTRA ATTENTION AND JUST WANTS TO SQUEEZE QTN INTO THE MARKET....AND SCREW OVER THE DAYTRADERS AND THOSE INTERESTED IN A QUICK BUCK VERSUS THOSE THAT BELIEVE IN "HIS VISION"....JUST THINKING OF POSSIBILITIES. MAYBE JOHN KERRY IS BEING SETUP TO LOSE BY THE DNC IN ORDER FOR A RUN WITH BILLARY CLINTON IN 2008??? POSSIBLE....YOU NEVER KNOW.

posted September 14, 2004 14:56            

ANOTHER FLAT OUT LIE COURTESY OF YOUR CEO FRANK OLSEN.

HTTP://WWW.QTELEVISION.COM

Q TELEVISION NETWORK CONFIRMS SOFT LAUNCH

posted September 14, 2004 14:58            

I think that is fairly safe to say that--

Making money is the objective of all traders.

Volatility seems to be the daytraders' bread and butter.

Everyone is responsible for their own decisions.

Posters may and do stretch the truth, state facts, omit facts, slam, pump, bash, whine. . .on and
on--all part of the process.

However, when negative posters show up sporadically with continuous patronizing comments about other shareholders, it is beyond reason to believe that they have concern for anyone other than themselves.

Where were many of these concerned "protectors" before the big dip?

Do you agee that they do seem to have excellent timing when protecting and benefiting themselves?

posted September 14, 2004 15:00            

quote:

---

Originally posted by sunny:
Just phoned QTN. Spoke briefly with Troy. He confirmed that they are indeed airing on channel 255 through RCN. I asked (quite nicely) why we haven't had this wonderful news formally released from Frank...he said that Frank had been out of town most of last week and has just returned. I asked him if he knew when or if a press release would come out...said he personally did not know but he was limited on what he could say.

I didn't talk to Troy but for a minute or so...sounded professional, kind and patient. Perhaps once Frank gets a good night sleep, he'll give everyone some welcome news.

---

If they start to make money, the company can buy frank a cell phone so going out of town will no longer be an excuse for the lack of communication.

posted September 14, 2004 15:10            

Press Release Source: Q Television Network

Q Television Network Makes Announcement
Tuesday June 15, 8:01 am ET

PALM SPRINGS, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--June 15, 2004--Q Television Network (Pink Sheets: QBID - News) CEO, Frank Olsen, announced today that Q executives traveled to New York and Seattle 12 days ago and successfully met their three major objectives, which were:

NO.1: The Q Television advertising campaign will begin June 21st

NO. 2: Q executives were also pleased to announce the acquisition of a large movie package to add to their programming library.

posted September 14, 2004 15:16            

Press Release Source: Q Television Network

Q Television Network Makes Announcement
Tuesday June 15, 8:01 am ET

PALM SPRINGS, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--June 15, 2004--Q Television Network (Pink Sheets: QBID - News) CEO, Frank Olsen, announced today that Q executives traveled to New York and Seattle 12 days ago and successfully met their three major objectives, which were:

posted September 14, 2004 15:18            

The volume of time you are investing on this board further validates QBID's tremendous potential!

posted September 14, 2004 15:23            

RCN THE CARRIER THAT IS "PUSHING" THE Q-TV SIGNAL HAS NOT A SINGLE THING ABOUT Q-TV ON THEIR WEBSITE.

Press Release Source: Q Television Network

Q Television Network Makes Announcement
Tuesday June 15, 8:01 am ET