posted October 09, 2004 10:34            

quote:

---

Originally posted by 1BigTip:
demusephoto reports back to Frank and is extremely close to QTN!!

---

Oh reeeallly..?? What is the nature of this relationship? Is he being paid for his services? Why does Frank bother hiring these 'major' PR firms if he's just going to send some kid into some online forum to spread his news for him? How do you know this guy can be trusted? Since when do broadcasting television networks use random internet characters to do their survey and reporting work for them?

quote:

---

I seriously hope they sent an email with questions about the company or the PPS. If you didn't, you don't deserve to post here or be a part of this stock!

---

HUH??? People who don't buy into this guy's bs don't deserve to post here or be a part of this stock? What have you been smoking???

quote:

---

They need to hear us voice our opinion and will be addressing it on the 28th, what a majority of us are asking.

---

Well since they have a habit of using these message forum users to transfer information back and forth, I'm sure they've heard all they need to. The 100,000 phone inquiries couldn't have hurt either...........

quote:

---

So yes, stop BSing in here and just send an email to him. demusephoto is not "just" another poster. Trust me!

---

Oh great, we can trust you! And I thought you were just another internet BSer... I feel better already!

posted October 09, 2004 10:46            

He is not a memeber of this board that i am aware of.

I have sent my e-mail as well.
here is the e-mail address to send your concerns to.

Markjohnson555@hotmail dot com

quote:

---

Originally posted by 1BigTip:
[b] Didn't want to be on here this weekend but this member is 100% correct! demusephoto reports back to Frank and is extremely close to QTN!! Whenever something is mentioned on the other forums, Frank addresses it in some way.

Even though people didn't respond to you, I seriously hope they sent an email with questions about the company or the PPS. If you didn't, you don't deserve to post here or be a part of this stock!

They need to hear us voice our opinion and will be addressing it on the 28th, what a majority of us are asking.

So yes, stop BSing in here and just send an email to him. demusephoto is not "just" another poster. Trust me!

I sent mine within the hour after he asked us to. Email me to see what I said.

---

posted October 09, 2004 10:55            

I have to agree abit with Robin on this one.

do you know him personally? Im not trying to cause problems, but it does seem odd that Frank would go this route and allow it to be this open. I dont doubt that he speaks with Frank but i have to wonder at this type of poster. he falls into the description posted earlier as a pumper.

I am not saying that we shouldnt be able to send questions. I would rather the questions be asked without giving them notice. they now have time to prepair great answers that are decieving.

and you should know better then to use the TRUST ME line. that always throws up a red flag.

all said I am not trying to bash anyone but everyone has the right to post in a public forum as long as the follow the forum rules.

You cant take ownership of the forum.

Now i hope for all our sakes that we get a big PR in this comming week as we are slowly sinking back. and we all need some forward movement here.

posted October 09, 2004 11:17            

Hope everyone has a great weekend!..C'mon Q!!!

posted October 09, 2004 12:08            

quote:

---

Originally posted by RobinO:
Yes, fantastic. What it basically says is don't listen to anyone but the cheerleaders. Keep up the good work tiger.

-R

---

Ummm, no. What it basically says is that people are, in fact, paid to bash stocks.

Keep up the good work tweety. I hear you're gettin' close to winning that Scranton vacation. LOL

Beware of the Basher!
Investopedia Staff (Investopedia.com)

Whether you are fairly new to online investing or a seasoned veteran, you've probably seen the message boards and chat rooms that focus on stocks. Many of these boards make tabloids look tame, churning out rumor after rumor 24 hours a day. Some of the more popular boards are getting upwards of 10,000 posts daily. Here we look at how the practice of bashing takes place on these boards, and how you can handle bashers when you encounter them.

The Advent of the Internet
No technology has changed the financial industry more than the Internet, which has allowed individual investors from every corner of the globe to meet and talk about the prospects and risks of companies. The free flow of information has changed the very way we invest, but this mass communication does not come without a price. The anonymity of the Internet has allowed unscrupulous people to distort and control artificially the price of a stock--these people are the bashers.

What Is a Basher?
A basher is a person who lurks in the shadows of investment chat rooms spreading calculated, and almost always unfounded, confidence-shaking news about a stock. The basher's purpose is to instigate a sell off that will in turn drive the stock price down, either for his or her own benefit or that of his or her employer.

This practice may seem fairly simple, but there is a science behind it. Supposedly, reputable companies and investment firms sometimes hire bashers to help make the conditions for a takeover more favorable. You see, when one company wants to buy another, stock price is king. If the stock of a multi-billion dollar target company changes even by one dollar, the difference in the price of the takeover can be millions of dollars. A basher who successfully pushes down the price of a stock may receive a very lucrative compensation.

How Bashers Get Paid
Bashers may also get paid by the number of responses they get from their postings. They act as catalysts, hoping to spread a firestorm of bad news about a stock. Due to the highly unethical and, in some cases, illegal act of hiring a basher, employers almost always remain anonymous. Bashers' employers will want to depress a stock price usually for one of two reasons: to increase their position in a company for a lower price, or to profit on the short side of the stock.

Here are some basher tactics that online chatters should be aware of:

Bashers lie! – Bashers have no ethical code that prevents them from lying. They will lie blatantly and often.

Bashers usually bash stocks that are more volatile – Bashers usually only go after stocks that could show a large increase or decrease in price. There's a low probability that a basher would ever be able to influence a company with a huge float like General Electric, for example.

Bashers will use any news – Bashers will not favor recent news over old news, or vice versa. They'll take information out of context if it will help depress a stock.

Bashers exploit investors' lack of knowledge – Most bashers rely on the notion that most investors don't check their facts and, as such, will use false information to sway people.

Bashers post frequently – Bashers are a persistent bunch. Through the use of repetition, they attempt to wear down those on the long side of stocks.

Bashers can travel in packs – It is common for a group of bashers to enter a chat room quietly and carefully and feed off each other's posts to dominate subtly the sentiment of the room.

Who Are Bashers' Prey?
As you can probably gather from the above list of tactics, bashers do not target well-informed investors but those who are easily persuaded. Bashers know that "green" or rookie investors are inherently wary of the market and oversensitive to bad news.

Anyone in a chat room who claims to be your friend and have your best interests in mind is likely a basher--after all, why would anyone give good advice for free in a chat room ? It's doubtful that experts such as Warren Buffett and Peter Lynch frequent these rooms. (Read more on Peter Lynch here.)

Levels of Bashers' Skills
The most effective bashers have strategies that are very well thought out. They often develop a character who draws attention and builds trust from others on the chat board. Good bashers try to appear sophisticated: they never use profanity because that would cause people to ignore them. Quite often, these bashers will respond condescendingly to their questioners for asking such "stupid" questions.

The purpose is to get a reaction from other posters: the more reaction, the more the room will be disrupted. To throw yet another wrench into the works, bashers often send in another person to side with the longs of a stock. Again, the idea behind this is to distract people, and to spread rumors and confusion throughout the room.

Not all bashers display such proficiency and dedication. Like any profession or sport, the bashing world has participants at different skill levels. It helps to know how the experts operate differently from the novices, so here is a list of the skills displayed in the different "leagues" (to use a baseball analogy) of bashers:

Major League – The major league bashers are excellent at what they do. The better the bashers are at their game, the tougher they are to spot. They are online constantly, always attacking and attempting to make positive postings look unreasonable. Those in the major leagues are masters at manipulation, knowing how to convince other chatters that a particular stock should be sold immediately.

AAA – These bashers are able to twist the meanings of words, phrases, quotes, and press releases quite compellingly; however, they do not have the same influence over others as those in the major leagues.

AA - These bashers are still learning the subtleties of the art of appearing like a trustworthy, sophisticated fellow investor. For example, a AA basher may react overzealously to comments that question his or her perpetually bearish attitude.

Bat Boy – Although this level of basher knows the profession and has known some major leaguers, he or she is utterly useless in the ways of bashing. The bat boy bashers make themselves obvious, using profanity, name calling and irrational arguments. These bashers are easily identified.

How to Handle Bashers
There are basically two ways in which chatters can handle bashers. Firstly, you should simply ignore them because they want and feed off attention. If they aren't getting any, they'll likely slink away and attempt to prey on more receptive victims. But sometimes the tenacious basher invading a good chat room needs to be confronted. Here are some tips that, if you must confront a basher, will likely help:

Do your due diligence. The phrase, "knowledge is power" is no more true than in this instance. Try to post a number of well-researched messages that confound the premise of a basher's arguments.

Do not engage bashers directly, but instead post general and open-ended messages disputing bashers' posts.

Remind those in the chat room that the mere fact that something is in writing does not make it the truth.

Conclusion
Bashing is always happening, so it's important for you to realize there are people out there who make a good living out of manipulating investors. Participating in a chat forum can be both enjoyable and insightful, but always remember to look at each message with the knowledge that its sender may not be sincere.

Cheers,

Investopedia Staff

posted October 09, 2004 12:19            

FIRST OF ALL, THEY ARE SCHEDULING A 1-HR PHONE CONFERENCE. 20-30 MINUTES WILL BE OF THEM TALKING ABOUT WHAT THEY ARE "DOING" AND HOW "Q IS DEFINITELY ON THE MOVE".

SECONDLY, THE BALANCE OF REMAINING PHONE CALLS WILL BE SCREENED AND NOT TAKEN AT RANDOM AND WILL PROBABLY BE ALREADY HAND PICKED BY FRANK HIMSELF TO MAKE SURE HE'S NOT SHOWN IN A BAD LIGHT OR PUT HIM IN A POSITION TO ANSWER "REAL" QUESTIONS. THIS IS COMMONLY DONE VIA THE RADIO DJ'S WHEN THE "LIVE" CALLS YOU HEAR ARE RECORDED AND SCREENED AND/OR EMPLOYEE'S THAT ARE WORKING IN THE STATION AND/OR FRIENDS OF THE DJ SITTING IN THE BOOTH WITH THEM MAKING IT LOOK LIKE THEY GET "OUTSIDE" CALLERS.

FRANK OLSEN HAS ESTABLISHED HIMSELF TO BE A FLAMBOYANT LIAR. HABITUAL AT THAT. HIS ACTIONS, HIS PR AND HIS CONVERSATIONS WITH PEOPLE ARE JUST THAT; LIES ON TOP OF LIES.

FRANK OLSEN IS NOT GOING TO FEED YOU ANYTHING OTHER THAN THE LIES HE HAS PREPARED AND TO CONTINUE WITH THE EXISTING LIES HE HAS ALREADY GIVEN TIME AND TIME AND TIME AND TIME AND TIME AGAIN.

AVERAGE CALL. 2-3 MINUTES FOR THE CALLER TO ASK A QUESTION. 3-5 MINUTES TO RESPOND PER CALL. IN A UN-CONTROLLED ENVIORNMENT WHICH TOTALS ABOUT 25-30 MINUTES FOR A TOTAL OF 5 CALLS. AGAIN, THIS WOULD BE A UNCONTROLLED ENVIORNMENT.

SINCE FRANK OLSEN WILL HAVE THIS THING SCREENED AND PREPARED, EXPECT NO MORE THAN 10 AND PROBABLY 5 TO 7 PRE-SCREENED PREPARED CALLS.

THEN AFTER THIS, WE WILL SEE A PR ABOUT HOW THE PHONE CONFERENCE WAS A HUGE SUCCESS, THE THOUSANDS OF CALLS THAT COULD NOT GET THROUGH SHOWING THE HUGE INTERESTED IN QBID.

97 BOTTLE OF BEER ON THE WALL....

posted October 09, 2004 13:23            

quote:

---

Originally posted by penny-trader:
I am not saying that we shouldnt be able to send questions. I would rather the questions be asked without giving them notice. they now have time to prepair great answers that are decieving.

---

Good point... plus if you have a question for QTN, just call them. It appears as though Frank and Co. have been pretty open about answering phone calls. Why bother with this unknown middleman?

posted October 09, 2004 13:39            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Just Looking:
Ummm, no. What it basically says is that people are, in fact, paid to bash stocks.

---

Oddly enough, that article does not exist on investopedia's website. Yes they keep an archive of articles, but I can't seem to find it. Care to share a link? I still think the idea that someone sits around counting replies to someone's posts in order to calculate another guy's paycheck is a ridiculous myth.

The funny thing is that a few years ago, another guy on another forum wrote a fake "I admit it, I'm a paid basher" letter. Regardless of the fact that it was an obvious hoax, everyone believed it.. it's a hilarious story that just goes to show how gullible people are.
http://www.thestreet.com/tech/internet/1165692.html

posted October 09, 2004 14:05            

Watch the volume rise these next few weeks.! Enjoy. Look at the big picture, don't let these other fools close your mind!

posted October 09, 2004 17:12            

quote:

---

Originally posted by RobinO:
Oddly enough, that article does not exist on investopedia's website. Yes they keep an archive of articles, but I can't seem to find it. Care to share a link? I still think the idea that someone sits around counting replies to someone's posts in order to calculate another guy's paycheck is a ridiculous myth.

The funny thing is that a few years ago, another guy on another forum wrote a fake "I admit it, I'm a paid basher" letter. Regardless of the fact that it was an obvious hoax, everyone believed it.. it's a hilarious story that just goes to show how gullible people are.
http://www.thestreet.com/tech/internet/1165692.html

-R

---

posted October 09, 2004 17:14            

quote:

---

Originally posted by RobinO:
Oddly enough, that article does not exist on investopedia's website. Yes they keep an archive of articles, but I can't seem to find it. Care to share a link? I still think the idea that someone sits around counting replies to someone's posts in order to calculate another guy's paycheck is a ridiculous myth.

The funny thing is that a few years ago, another guy on another forum wrote a fake "I admit it, I'm a paid basher" letter. Regardless of the fact that it was an obvious hoax, everyone believed it.. it's a hilarious story that just goes to show how gullible people are.
http://www.thestreet.com/tech/internet/1165692.html

-R

---

posted October 09, 2004 17:20            

quote:

---

Originally posted by 1BigTip:
Another thing to think about is the fact that this Conference Call will bring in new investors. Do you think they'll talk about negative things? No. They will talk about progress and future plans. The new investors will want to jump in.

Watch the volume rise these next few weeks.! Enjoy. Look at the big picture, don't let these other fools close your mind!

no penny that post was not for you. It was general.

---

posted October 09, 2004 18:05            

quote:

---

Originally posted by kbpkt:
this conference call is a bad idea. None of the serious questions that most of the people on here have will be answered.

---

Oh you mean why the website isn't updated??

Everyone has a right to their own opinion but to say the conference call is a bad idea just makes you look "unintelligent"

EVERY COMPANY HAS CONFERENCE CALLS. GEEZ. I remember calling in a few CC's myself before investing in the company, just to see where they stand, what their objectives were, and what their doing about it.

Saying its a bad idea is decieving other peoples views.
Would you rather be in the dark?

It's the best idea but I'm terrified they'll cancel it. Delay is no problem.

I voted for Rene to speak. No offense to Frank but I think Rene would be a better speaker.

posted October 09, 2004 18:14            

quote:

---

Originally posted by firefly:
Big, you have mail.

---

posted October 09, 2004 18:36            

Since we don't have the hotline, we hear nothing. I could care less about the website updating.

I want to know more serious issues like when will they be a reporting company. That to me is the most important thing to invest in a company long term.

The CC will be good for Q. Obviously nothing else is working. 5 PR's in a row didn't even help.

We'll see, we'll all see soon.

posted October 09, 2004 19:04            

1) A/S
2) O/S
3) float
4) is there restricted shares
5) Is there any other signed contract (don't have to give out info that other party not wanting released) but is there something signed with any other company.
6)programming line-up and why it's not on web page.
7) Address rumor of public and private companies. I pretty much know its not true but want to here it from Frank.
8) Since we are not a reporting company what is the finanial situation of Q.

Well can dream anyway can't I.

posted October 09, 2004 20:36            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Just Looking:
I love how you don't challenge my statement, instead you change the subject. Fly away, little bird. LOL

---

No, I challenged whether or not that article actually exists on investopedia's website, then brought up a story that points out how lots of people believe there are paid bashers but can't provide any evidence. Oh yeah, the companies are really secretive so we can't tell who's doing it.. that's convenient. I shot a note to the people at investopedia to get more information on their article. Just because it's on the internet doesn't mean it's true. Heck, if you click the link at the beginning of that page you posted, it takes you to some guy's site where he sells you his plan for how to become a millionaire in a matter of a few years by using his investing technique that will get you blacklisted from Wall Street.. oo oo sign me up!

posted October 09, 2004 20:39            

1 other quick note and I need to take a break from here:

For years I've been following or doing DD on other "start-up" companies and almost all of them had a proposed date which was never met. Can you think of a company that either, gives investors their proposed dates and meets them all OR never tells their investors about any proposed dates.

posted October 09, 2004 22:39            

quote:

---

Originally posted by 1BigTip:
Another thing to think about is the fact that this Conference Call will bring in new investors. Do you think they'll talk about negative things? No. They will talk about progress and future plans. The new investors will want to jump in.

Watch the volume rise these next few weeks.! Enjoy. Look at the big picture, don't let these other fools close your mind!

no penny that post was not for you. It was general.

---

posted October 09, 2004 23:27            

I wish I can draw out charts for you but we'll have to do with text only.

2004
We are in an "Accumulation within a rounding bottom"

The formation of a rounding bottom is usually an extended process. The decline in price (.028 - .0070) gradually decelarates until it merges into a section at the bottom which is almost flat (.0038-.0060) which then merges into a gradually accelerating rise. Because the initial phase of the price rise is so slow, the complete outline of the rounding bottom does not become apparent until an uptrend has been established.. If you can predict an accumulation pattern which could become a rounding bottom, you can be more then confident that the price will develop an uptrend.

2002,2003
It was in an "Accumulation within a trading range"

When a trading range forms, there is uncertainty about whether the price breakout will be to the upside or the downside. If well informed, long term investors are buying within the trading range (.0001 - .0005), the eventual breakout will probably be to the upside (.0001 - .028). But you should not buy the stock until the breakout occurs, because the upside breakout is not a certainty, and the length of the trading range can't be determined in advance.