Thread Closed  Topic Closed
  Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board
  Micro Penny Stocks, Penny Stocks Under $0.10
  CMKX ... VI ... The Saga Continues (Page 21)

Post New Topic  
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!
This topic is 53 pages long:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53 
next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   CMKX ... VI ... The Saga Continues
Upside
Member
posted September 14, 2004 20:27     Click Here to See the Profile for Upside     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
originally posted by Will:
quote:
So...what you're telling me is:
That even in the face of a proven fact, ironclad logic, indisputable evidence, readily apparent proof, there will be people who refuse to admit that the squeeze of the centruy will not happen.

Yes

quote:
Then I have to ask you this:

What will it take for those who believe the squeeze of the century is still alive to admit it is over? Will it take all the claims being sweetherted away, and a PR apologizing to shareholders that UC did all he could, but has to padlock the door and move on, because it just didn't work? Will it take the demise of CMKX to convince those that unreasonably hold to these beliefs?
I want the squeeze, I want the PPS to go soaring. If this is checkmate, which it seems to be, the day of rekoning,(9/24), I can want all I want and have nothing. Then I imagine it will be, "we don't know what's in those samples". It could be months and months before the results are announced, but then it will be, "well, it's part of the plan, they don't want DeBeers to know what they have".
Your right it will be bunk, but it will go on until the padlock is on the door.



Right


IP: Logged

highwaychild
Member
posted September 14, 2004 20:42     Click Here to See the Profile for highwaychild     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by will:
Got ya! I'm getting old and thick, my friend. This "saga" is aging me.

So your not saying who?

IP: Logged

Upside
Member
posted September 14, 2004 20:44     Click Here to See the Profile for Upside     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
originally posted by highwaychild:
quote:
So your not saying who?

Who what?

IP: Logged

glassman
Member
posted September 14, 2004 20:45     Click Here to See the Profile for glassman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
i want to know who B C is too...LOL

i am still trying to find a stock worthy of all this energy....
when i do i will alert you...

IP: Logged

Upside
Member
posted September 14, 2004 20:45     Click Here to See the Profile for Upside     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Hey Will, you wanna field this one?

IP: Logged

will
Member
posted September 14, 2004 20:50     Click Here to See the Profile for will     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
It just maybe too offensive to discuss openly here. I'm afraid it will have to remain between Upman and I.
I guess you're thinking this makes us even, Upman. You put me on the spot. You are the perpertator on this one, and I get caught holding the stink bag. LOL
Well, we AIN'T even, I owe you 5. LOL

quote:
Originally posted by Upside:
Hey Will, you wanna field this one?

IP: Logged

highwaychild
Member
posted September 14, 2004 20:53     Click Here to See the Profile for highwaychild     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
That's cool.I understand.

IP: Logged

highwaychild
Member
posted September 14, 2004 21:11     Click Here to See the Profile for highwaychild     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by glassman:

I am still trying to find a stock worthy of all this energy....
when I do I will alert you...


Good luck,I don't think you'll find one.

P.S.I had a little luck with one of your picks.BIMR.Didn't want to tell ya,but thanks.

[This message has been edited by highwaychild (edited September 14, 2004).]

IP: Logged

Upside
Member
posted September 14, 2004 21:13     Click Here to See the Profile for Upside     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
originally posted by will:
quote:
It just maybe too offensive to discuss openly here. I'm afraid it will have to remain between Upman and I.
I guess you're thinking this makes us even, Upman. You put me on the spot. You are the perpertator on this one, and I get caught holding the stink bag. LOL
Well, we AIN'T even, I owe you 5. LOL

Wimp.

IP: Logged

secman
Member
posted September 14, 2004 21:19     Click Here to See the Profile for secman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Ouch it bounced from .0002 to .0003 all day and never touched .0004 lol.. STOCK PLAY OF A LIFE TIME MY ASS with 800 a/s this pig isn't going anywhere down even with paid pumpers sterling, Green barron , melvin etc pumping with lies and the most bull**** theories I have ever heard. Sterling is NOT a stock trader ... CMKX is the only investment he has... yet he comes up with the most bull**** theories I ever heard and the goofy hick dopes that goes to the drag races buy it all..


AHAHAHHAH LOL HEHHHEHEHEHEHEEH

Yeah we Trust Urban to bad he released a PR on carolyn and forgot to include the sample sizes... OOoooPS!! To bad he raised the A/s to 800 billion and forgot to PR that .... WOOOPPS! To bad he's giving a piece of junk KIA at the shareholders party when supposedly by all the pumpers the squeeze will happen and PPS will shoot up.... Ahahahaah To bad he's involved with tons of shell companies in Nevada with addresses from abandoned offices... WHOOOPS.. Urban must be thinking DAM those internet nerds will find anything!!!!

IP: Logged

highwaychild
Member
posted September 14, 2004 21:28     Click Here to See the Profile for highwaychild     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by secman:
[B]


AHAHAHHAH LOL HEHHHEHEHEHEHEEH

B]


CMKX has/will paid dividends.

1 : an individual share of something distributed: as a : a share in a pro rata distribution (as of profits) to stockholders b : a share of surplus allocated to a policyholder in a participating insurance policy
2 a : a resultant return or reward b : BONUS
3 a : a number to be divided b : a sum or fund to be divided and distributed

IP: Logged

highwaychild
Member
posted September 14, 2004 21:37     Click Here to See the Profile for highwaychild     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Oh well,I'm gone.Kindof felling hung out to dry tonight anyway.

IP: Logged

will
Member
posted September 14, 2004 22:01     Click Here to See the Profile for will     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
WHIMP ?
I don't think byrd would even go that far, Upman.
quote:
Originally posted by Upside:
originally posted by will:
Wimp.

IP: Logged

Upside
Member
posted September 14, 2004 22:10     Click Here to See the Profile for Upside     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I don't know about that. I'll bet he would.

IP: Logged

will
Member
posted September 14, 2004 22:17     Click Here to See the Profile for will     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Yea, yea, yea! You just want me drummed off of the thread.
Check the tape on my mouth :X
and........if byrd would, he's crazier than I think he is, but I guess under the right circumstances he would shout it out. On the other hand, I still have the sense I was born with.

quote:
Originally posted by Upside:
I don't know about that. I'll bet he would.

IP: Logged

Wallace#1
Member
posted September 14, 2004 22:18     Click Here to See the Profile for Wallace#1     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Still speculating, guys?

None of those dates will do anything for shareholders of CMKX. Look at where it is heading right now! Already, holders have been told to hold on, big things will happen...and that's just within the past two days.

There is nothing to explain the insistence that CMKX has any value whatsoever.

The market price? No! That's just hype, dreams, greed, pump and hope.

Assets? No! Claim assets are 100% unproven, and, when it comes to mining the odds are against it. Cash or funds are just being washed back and forth from one company to the other. Equipment is practically non-existent. Potential is just a word without proven value. Dividends have been proven to be worthless in the past or have been withdrawn.

Earnings? Never have been any positive earnings whatsoever. Maybe they've made a couple of dollars on CMKX funny car "T" shirts, but nothing else. Selling claims as previously stated is nothing more than feeding from one hand to the other and back again.

Conflicts of interest and non-arm's length transactions? Typical of an unethical operation and they are commonplace.

Financial reporting? Non-existent. In fact, just the opposite by refusing to file with the SEC.

Glenn? Guaranteed that in three months time the company could have been brought into a reporting mode and filing with the SEC. Where was he when the company refused, forgot or whatever to disclose the increase of 300 billion authorized shares? Guaranteed he is there to keep things legal so they can get away with what they have been doing with out criminal prosecution. How does that protect the shareholders?

Issued and Outstanding Shares? Think about it! If they were able to increase the authorized shares by 300 billion, that means that there had to be someone individually or as a combined group controlling the outstanding shares at the time it was passed.
That probably means UC and or the family combined. Ten to one the present issued and outstanding is more that the 480-483 billion shares talked about...probably well over 500 billion right now.

This stock is unlikely to go anywhere at all except into the dumper. I suggested you sell many times before and the latest was at
.0004. Now it is flirting with .0002 and the next step is .0001. Then what will you do? Continue to hold and say, "Well, it can't go down any more!" Problem with that is there is one more step and that is BK and not any trading at all.

What a pity so many have been sucked into this stock! What a pity more will buy because someone is telling them it is a great stock, that it has potential, to wait until ???? (doomsday, I guess), that wealth is right around the corner, that they are confident, that they trust UC, Glenn and others involved, that UC and Glenn have a plan. Sure, and you lose!

[This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited September 14, 2004).]

IP: Logged

will
Member
posted September 14, 2004 22:26     Click Here to See the Profile for will     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Do you, can you, refute anything or everything he has said. Can you disprove his points. Most of what he said looked factual to me.
No one might like the the points he made, but are they true or false?

[This message has been edited by Allstocks (edited September 14, 2004).]

IP: Logged

Wallace#1
Member
posted September 14, 2004 22:52     Click Here to See the Profile for Wallace#1     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Forget it, Will! There have been worse!

Good night.

[This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited September 14, 2004).]

IP: Logged

glassman
Member
posted September 14, 2004 22:59     Click Here to See the Profile for glassman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
WHO IS B. C.???? LOL

IP: Logged

will
Member
posted September 14, 2004 23:00     Click Here to See the Profile for will     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Sure there has been worse and there will be more too.

Where are the "noble" ones here?

You know, we don't even have to go there.

Someone please pull this apart and show everyone where it is lacking or wrong.

"Assets? No! Claim assets are 100% unproven, and, when it comes to mining the odds are against it. Cash or funds are just being washed back and forth from one company to the other. Equipment is practically non-existent. Potential is just a word without proven value. Dividends have been proven to be worthless in the past or have been withdrawn."

Is that statement all false, all true, partly false, partly true? Pull it apart, talk about it. Disprove it. Don't attack the poster. If you can't win the arguement you call the other guy a communist? Go get em tailgunner joes.

IP: Logged

Grasshopper
Member
posted September 14, 2004 23:23     Click Here to See the Profile for Grasshopper     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Man, I feel like I'm reading a spin-off of "Dumb & Dumber". Sorry, but even Carrey and Daniels were more clever than the two of you!

Try this guys:
PROVE that CMKM has no claim assets!
PROVE that any claims they have are worthless!
PROVE that RG is just there to help UC "get away" with screwing the shareholders!
PROVE that every other company involved with CMKM is also out to scam us!
Please, PROVE ANYTHING that you guys continually spew forth. Don't back that weak stuff up by saying "betcha can't disprove it". That's why this is called SPECULATION! I don't need a damn guarantee to put money on a stock trading at this level.

I'll let "Little Willie" and "Dead Man Walking" get back to work. They're going to have to be pretty busy if they want to shake loose many more shares.

Well, night y'all. I'll check back in a few days......

IP: Logged

Doctoall
Member
posted September 14, 2004 23:37     Click Here to See the Profile for Doctoall     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Go CMKX all the way to the top. Long and Holding here 8 mil strong.

------------------
"If We Agree To Disagree, Then We Can Remain friends"

[This message has been edited by Doctoall (edited September 14, 2004).]

IP: Logged

will
Member
posted September 14, 2004 23:38     Click Here to See the Profile for will     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
LOL. Shake shares loose? I really don't care if you keep em until they're dust. I want this POS to go too.
My only point is, it's so much easier for ya'll to do your "dumb and dumber" routine then it is for you to post facts.
The company has given dividends before, and the value? Nothing. That's a fact. Anymore you see there, oh sage?
Sure it's specualtion, and it is looking weak. The other point you miss is that belivers were tauting buying this stock even at the .0011 level. at .0007, at .0005, and another fact, it did flirt with .0002 today, closed down at .0003.
I laugh at your "dumb and dumber" when I see alot of people that can't understand that maybe they haven't been outright lied to, but they sure haven't been told all the facts from the company. Of course they choose to excuse that as being part of a "Master Plan".
I would like you to do me a favor, oh sage, grasshopper. If the NSS squeeze of the century doesn't ocurr 9/24/04, will you be the first to explain it to me why it didn't. If it happens I will apologize to every believer here, and say I was wrong. Now keep in mind it has to ocurr 9/24, the UCAD didvidend is restricted, and all shares have to be accounted for, so it is checkmate. Let's see what you have to say in 10 days.

quote:
Originally posted by Grasshopper:
Man, I feel like I'm reading a spin-off of "Dumb & Dumber". Sorry, but even Carrey and Daniels were more clever than the two of you!

Try this guys:
PROVE that CMKM has no claim assets!
PROVE that any claims they have are worthless!
PROVE that RG is just there to help UC "get away" with screwing the shareholders!
PROVE that every other company involved with CMKM is also out to scam us!
Please, PROVE ANYTHING that you guys continually spew forth. Don't back that weak stuff up by saying "betcha can't disprove it". That's why this is called SPECULATION! I don't need a damn guarantee to put money on a stock trading at this level.

I'll let "Little Willie" and "Dead Man Walking" get back to work. They're going to have to be pretty busy if they want to shake loose many more shares.

Well, night y'all. I'll check back in a few days......


IP: Logged

noahltl
New Member
posted September 14, 2004 23:52     Click Here to See the Profile for noahltl     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Wallace#1:
Still speculating, guys?


A: Yes that't the nature of pinks.

None of those dates will do anything for shareholders of CMKX. Look at where it is heading right now! Already, holders have been told to hold on, big things will happen...and that's just within the past two days.


A: We dont't know if those dates will do anything or not until they arrive, and neither do you. Holding on is absolutely the right thing to do. That's my opinion and it's based on more fact than you have ever delivered here.

There is nothing to explain the insistence that CMKX has any value whatsoever.

A: 1.9 million acres of claims in what has been billed as the largest diamond mining find in the world.

The market price? No! That's just hype, dreams, greed, pump and hope.


A: Once again, only time will tell.

Assets? No! Claim assets are 100% unproven, and, when it comes to mining the odds are against it. Cash or funds are just being washed back and forth from one company to the other. Equipment is practically non-existent. Potential is just a word without proven value. Dividends have been proven to be worthless in the past or have been withdrawn.

A: The proof of the claims, worth, funds moving to shell corp's. All can be answered with D Roger Glemm. He wouldn't be with us without value. Or without a plan to take us private and deal with NSS.

Earnings? Never have been any positive earnings whatsoever. Maybe they've made a couple of dollars on CMKX funny car "T" shirts, but nothing else. Selling claims as previously stated is nothing more than feeding from one hand to the other and back again.


A: The fact they haven't told you the earnings doesn't mean there haven't been any. Do you understand the nature of "exploration"? There aren't any diamond earnings until diamonds are mined. That doesn't mean we haven't had earnings. Have you noticed the millions of dollars coming in from JV's and institutional investors?
Do you know if we have sold off mineral rights to other minerals besides diamonds. This area is rich in plutonium, gold and other precious minerals. Plutonium is too difficult to handle for most mining operations. And we are looking for diamonds.

Conflicts of interest and non-arm's length transactions? Typical of an unethical operation and they are commonplace.


A: You cite CMKX for illegal operations? Do you have proof to back that up?

Financial reporting? Non-existent. In fact, just the opposite by refusing to file with the SEC.


A: Pinks don't have to file. This stock has been a pink as long as most investors can remember. Yet we bought it. Can any stockholder complain about a pink not reporting. If reporting, would we be tipping off the competition to what we had? You can't apply 'big board' rules to pinks.


Glenn? Guaranteed that in three months time the company could have been brought into a reporting mode and filing with the SEC. Where was he when the company refused, forgot or whatever to disclose the increase of 300 billion authorized shares? Guaranteed he is there to keep things legal so they can get away with what they have been doing with out criminal prosecution. How does that protect the shareholders?

A: How can you guarantee how long it would take an attorney to bring this company into compliance? You don't know his strategy or the obstacles he has to face before completion. And once again you are accusing Urban of doing things that would result in criminal prosecution? Do you have proof or just engaging in some more criminal libel?

Issued and Outstanding Shares? Think about it! If they were able to increase the authorized shares by 300 billion, that means that there had to be someone individually or as a combined group controlling the outstanding shares at the time it was passed.
That probably means UC and or the family combined. Ten to one the present issued and outstanding is more that the 480-483 billion shares talked about...probably well over 500 billion right now.


A: You refute yourself here. The AS was 500 billion on August 18, when it was increased. That means UC and family / insiders had to control 251 billion or so. Leaving a real OS of 249 billion, if all he had was 51%. There is no evidence that any of that 300 billion has been issued. It was probably done to complete a deal made in the Sask meeting the weekend before.

This stock is unlikely to go anywhere at all except into the dumper. I suggested you sell many times before and the latest was at
.0004. Now it is flirting with .0002 and the next step is .0001. Then what will you do? Continue to hold and say, "Well, it can't go down any more!" Problem with that is there is one more step and that is BK and not any trading at all.

A: It has flirted with everything between .0001 and .0011 in last few months. If it goes to .0001 then those of us who believe in this stock will load up with more.

What a pity so many have been sucked into this stock! What a pity more will buy because someone is telling them it is a great stock, that it has potential, to wait until ???? (doomsday, I guess), that wealth is right around the corner, that they are confident, that they trust UC, Glenn and others involved, that UC and Glenn have a plan. Sure, and you lose!


A: Well it can never be said that Wallace wasn't a sympathetic humanitarian at heart.
Trying to save the world and no one listens.

[This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited September 14, 2004).]


Is it just my imagination or do all of the bashers always show up all at once. Do you guys PM each other and say "O.K. pps is down, or bad news, let's all get over to Allstocks and see if we can scare a few more weak hands into selling."?

IP: Logged

noahltl
New Member
posted September 14, 2004 23:59     Click Here to See the Profile for noahltl     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Will said:

"If the NSS squeeze of the century doesn't ocurr 9/24/04, will you be the first to explain it to me why it didn't. If it happens I will apologize to every believer here, and say I was wrong. Now keep in mind it has to ocurr 9/24, the UCAD didvidend is restricted, and all shares have to be accounted for, so it is checkmate. Let's see what you have to say in 10 days."


*****************************************

Will, come on, do we look that easy? The Sept 24 date was never PR'd, it's only customary for a dividend to be issued 30 days after the x-date. It is only speculative. We don't have a pay date for any but GEMM. So don't try to trap us into a hard date that you can say: "See, I told ya so."

[This message has been edited by noahltl (edited September 15, 2004).]

IP: Logged

noahltl
New Member
posted September 15, 2004 00:00     Click Here to See the Profile for noahltl     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Give me patience. And give it to me NOW!!!

IP: Logged

will
Member
posted September 15, 2004 00:04     Click Here to See the Profile for will     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Well, noah, you furnished answers, thanks. Many of them do include faith in the management, and a "plan", and time will tell, but at least you took three swings at it.
..and please, not everyone who sees things differently than you is a basher. I choose to be cautious, and not have faith in the management. From the beginning I found the idea of a "master plan" just too easy to hide behind. I would really prefer forthright, honest, complete, information as opposed to a test of faith.
Believe it or not, I am on the same side you are. I want my little investment of $300 to grow astronomically, just that
I have to be honest with myself, and I'm sure you feel you are being honest with yourself too.

IP: Logged

will
Member
posted September 15, 2004 00:17     Click Here to See the Profile for will     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Ok naoh, I am only going with everyone else is specualting. Would it be fair to say the pay date of the UCAD dividend should see the squeeze of the century? I think you even alluded to the CIM dividend the one that really counts because it is a private company. Would it be fair to use that pay date as the date we should see the squeeze of the century? I say if UCAD is restricted than its pay date should trigger the sqeeze. The CIM dividend has a record date of 8/31? So, the pay date should be 10/1? That is customarily. If they don't ocurr 30 days after, what would be a good grace period for the company to get their ducks in a row? 60 days after record date? 90 days? 180 days? When will it begin to errode your fsith in CMKX, a year after record date?
I wasn't trying to trap you into a "I told you so position", grasshopper was being a wiseass, and just goes along with the long crowd, that was for him.
Tell me when it becomes tiring, and you begin to doubt the intentions of the management, at what date?

quote:
Originally posted by noahltl:
Will said:

"If the NSS squeeze of the century doesn't ocurr 9/24/04, will you be the first to explain it to me why it didn't. If it happens I will apologize to every believer here, and say I was wrong. Now keep in mind it has to ocurr 9/24, the UCAD didvidend is restricted, and all shares have to be accounted for, so it is checkmate. Let's see what you have to say in 10 days."


*****************************************

Will, come on, do we look that easy? The Sept 24 date was never PR'd, it's only customary for a dividend to be issued 30 days after the x-date. It is only speculative. We don't have a pay date for any but GEMM. So don't try to trap us into a hard date that you can say: "See, I told ya so."


[This message has been edited by noahltl (edited September 15, 2004).]


IP: Logged

Upside
Member
posted September 15, 2004 00:18     Click Here to See the Profile for Upside     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
And the problem with the GEMM shares being distributed on 10/1 is that they are not restricted, at least to the best of my knowledge. So the evildoers could just buy enough of them on the open market to cover their short position. And on and on it goes.

IP: Logged

lanebro
Member
posted September 15, 2004 00:21     Click Here to See the Profile for lanebro     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Please don't let this be your reason for believing in CMKX. You really don't know anything about car racing sponsorships. Trust me. It's all about "show me the money." That's all there is.
Diamonds. Hmmm. Good luck folks.
Okay now its "-ium". Hmm.
Did I tell y'all I saw 1000's of CMKXtreme packets (hero card and propoganda handouts) in the trash at Indy? 10,00 shirts given away? My grandaughter was given 50! All at once.
At the "party"; 100 people showed, maybe. My Motorhome (coach, for those in the know) 200 feet away, for days.
No UC, maybe a Vinny, know him? Never saw that other dude either, UCADman, and I see ALL. Not to say he wasn't there, just wasn't very apparent.

quote:
Originally posted by dwman:
JIM DUNN INKS ROCK-SOLID MARKETING PARTNER BEGINNING IN 2005
(7-14-2004) - Jim Dunn Racing has signed CMKM Diamonds, Inc., as its primary marketing partner beginning in 2005. The multi-year agreement serves notice to the competition that the new CMKX / Lucas Oil Funny Car will race to win during the entire NHRA POWERade series.

To demonstrate the strength of this new partnership, CMKM has obtained a prominent Associate-level spot on the K&N Filters / Lucas Oil Funny Car for the remainder of the 2004 season. In doing so, CMKM is proud to be associated with some of the most respected names in the automotive aftermarket industry.

Team Owner Jim Dunn stated, "We couldn't be more pleased to be making this announcement at the half-way point of the season. With CMKM coming aboard early, it allows us to build our relationship and develop a high-impact campaign for the coming year. Starting in 2005, we'll be known as the CMKX / Lucas Oil Funny Car."

CMKM founder and Chairman of the Board, Urban Casavant, is a veteran in the precious metals industry, having almost 20 years of experience. He commented, "I'm excited to be associated with Jim Dunn Racing. This is a first-class operation, and with 'Big Jim's' know-how, our team will be in the winner's circle soon. In my opinion, our first big win will equal the excitement of discovering a new minerals claim."

CMKM Diamonds, Inc., is a mining and exploration company with abundant mineral claims in central Canada. The company has over one-million acres claimed in the Saskatchewan Province of Canada. A great new alliance has been formed and all parties are ready for action! http://www.competitionplus.com/06_17_2004/newsdirt.html


IP: Logged

noahltl
New Member
posted September 15, 2004 00:22     Click Here to See the Profile for noahltl     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by will:
Well, noah, you furnished answers, thanks. Many of them do include faith in the management, and a "plan", and time will tell, but at least you took three swings at it.
..and please, not everyone who sees things differently than you is a basher. I choose to be cautious, and not have faith in the management. From the beginning I found the idea of a "master plan" just too easy to hide behind. I would really prefer forthright, honest, complete, information as opposed to a test of faith.
Believe it or not, I am on the same side you are. I want my little investment of $300 to grow astronomically, just that
I have to be honest with myself, and I'm sure you feel you are being honest with yourself too.

Will, you have undoubtedly done your DD, so I won't belabor that on this thread. But knowing the history of this company, the naked shorting of the past, if you don't believe in it currently going on. The possibility that powerful competitors would try to wrest control from him. The complexitites of putting together exploration, drilling and mining operations of this scale. Would these not require a "master plan" to bring it all together?

Woould such a plan not require an attorney of the caliber of RG?

And to paraphrase Forrest Gump: "Bashing is as bashing does."

IP: Logged

noahltl
New Member
posted September 15, 2004 00:32     Click Here to See the Profile for noahltl     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Will, if you are looking for a point at which I would sell CMKX, what is a reasonable time to wait, etc., I would have to sum it up, as when I know we don't have a diamond mine. That is why I bought in back in early February. I didn't buy in because of any "squeeze" on the MM's. That all came later and could be a big bonus. I didn't buy in because of dividends, but that could also be a very sweet bonus. So timelines and deadlines don't have any final bearing on my decision to stay with this stock. It's only DIAMONDS. Everything else is only an interesting sideline. Goldak surveys, hundreds of anomalies, unannounced core samplings. ongoing drilling, and Roger Glenn at the legal helm. Those are the things that really interest me.

IP: Logged

will
Member
posted September 15, 2004 00:44     Click Here to See the Profile for will     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
DD my butt. There is very little real information here. I bought this just in case. I was new and paper trading when all the hoopla of the .0001 QBID was going on, and vowed not to spend a dime without fulfilling my paper trading commitment to myself. Needless to say I missed QBID it was at .003 and I figured 3000% was a pretty impressive gain, and missed it all together. Well, rather than kicking myself again, I bought CMKX.
I'm not here to save anyone. I'm selfish, I don't care if anyone makes it, sells it, eats it, does whatever they like with it. Maybe I like to argue, with you, with myself, with anyone else?
I just find it difficult to believe that people can have that much faith in this management. It's been pointed out that the company has been here, or close to here before, and then nothing, flatline .0001. It does have history. It does have a pattern of being ambiguous with it's information. I just like to see a change in pattern.
I know alot of folks hang their hat on R.G., could it not be possible he is there to keep CMKX between the white lines while they sell off claims and leave a worthless shell? Is that not a possibility?
I just think until they change their behavior as a company it would be prudent to error on the side of caution. When they play fair and announce the share structure, sample results, progress of becoming a reporting company, then I'll believe more.
God! Look at past Pr's, the issue of O/S shares was to be resolved with the change of T/A's, we forget these things. Listen to the rumors salted by Melvin, Sept 5 was the big weekend. I know, Urban got called to the sight only to stoke more rumors. No PR's worthy of the rumors.
You don't see a pattern here? You really don't?

quote:
Originally posted by noahltl:
Will, you have undoubtedly done your DD, so I won't belabor that on this thread. But knowing the history of this company, the naked shorting of the past, if you don't believe in it currently going on. The possibility that powerful competitors would try to wrest control from him. The complexitites of putting together exploration, drilling and mining operations of this scale. Would these not require a "master plan" to bring it all together?

Woould such a plan not require an attorney of the caliber of RG?

And to paraphrase Forrest Gump: "Bashing is as bashing does."


[This message has been edited by will (edited September 15, 2004).]

IP: Logged

lanebro
Member
posted September 15, 2004 00:47     Click Here to See the Profile for lanebro     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
LOL, Maybe there's some link here:
A funny page copy:

A man walking by a house sees a sign that reads:
"Talking Dog for Sale."
He walks up to the door, rings the bell and asks about the dog. The owner tells him the dog is in the backyard.
The guy goes into the backyard and sees a black mutt just sitting there.
"You talk?" he asks.
"Sure do." the dog replies.
"So, what's your story?"
The dog looks up and says, "Well, I discovered my gift of talking pretty young and I wanted to help the government, so I told the CIA about my gift, and in no time they had me jetting from country to
country, sitting in rooms with spies and world leaders, because no one figured a dog would be eavesdropping.
I was one of their most valuable spies eight years running."
"The jetting around really tired me out, and I knew I wasn't getting any younger and I wanted to settle down. So I signed up for a job at the airport to do some undercover security work, mostly wandering near
suspicious characters and listening in. I uncovered some incredible dealings there and was awarded a batch of medals."
"Had a wife, a mess of puppies, and now I'm just retired."
The guy is amazed. He goes back in and asks the owner what he wants for the dog.
The owner says, "Ten dollars."
The guy says, "This dog is amazing. Why on earth are you selling him so cheap?"
"Cause he's a liar. He didn't do any of that ****."

Hmmm

IP: Logged

thecwexperience76
New Member
posted September 15, 2004 00:49     Click Here to See the Profile for thecwexperience76     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
thanks bill that puts my mind at ease...i thought everyone else was getting their shares except for me *smile*...btw i am now under thecwexperience76 instead of thecwexperience...i am having such a time w/ my password and email address section...hopefully i can get help w/ my old name which has a little tenure....

quote:
Originally posted by bill1352:
ucad shares will not be delivered to brokers till the pay date of the 24th. looking for them in our accounts before that date is useless as our brokers dont have them to put in our accounts. the 24th is the first date they may show up and even that is still in question as the company has not yet set a firm date. a firm date should come in the form of a pr. even the split is still a question. if you read the original pr it states further details of this dividend will be announced.looking for ucad shares in our accounts before the pay date is like looking for your pay check on monday and pay day is friday

IP: Logged

Upside
Member
posted September 15, 2004 01:02     Click Here to See the Profile for Upside     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Everyones screaming for facts about this company, I've got a few.

Fact: On October 3, 2003 shareholders of record received a dividend of CMI stock which was untradeable. On December 8, 2003 they said CMI would be a publicly traded company within two weeks. It never happened. On December 19, 2003 they said the CMI shares would be exchanged on January 15, 2004, 1 for 1 with Mirador Corp., symbol MRDR. That never happened. On June 13, 2004, they abandoned the MRDR exchange and it has not been addressed since.

Fact: We know of three dividends currently being paid out, UCAD, CIM, and GEMM. UCAD shares will be restricted for an unknown period of time, CIM is not tradeable, GEMM closed today at .038. If the o/s of CMKx is only 400 billion and GEMM is around the same price on the distribution date, for every million shares you hold, you will receive approx. 9 dollars worth of stock. Outside of GEMM, the other dividends are worthless as of right now.

Fact: CMKX's land claims do not appear on any Government published claim map. The only place you will see their name is on the maps printed and published by CMKX for their own promotional purposes.

Fact: The company released a p/r on June 10th 2004 stating the Carolyn pipe was found to be diamondiferous. This was at minimum a misleading p/r designed to cause hype. To date they have not released the results from the other half of the core samples.

Fact: the outstanding share count of this company is a minimum of 400 billion, a number which their spokesperson Melvin flatly denied in June of this year.


Anything other than this is pure speculation including naked shorts, Roger Glenns role, the airborne survey, anomoly count, additional core sample results, current drilling progress, etc.

IP: Logged

noahltl
New Member
posted September 15, 2004 01:08     Click Here to See the Profile for noahltl     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Will said:

"I know alot of folks hang their hat on R.G., could it not be possible he is there to keep CMKX between the white lines while they sell off claims and leave a worthless shell? Is that not a possibility?"

*****************************************

Not just a possibility, I think that you have come incredibly close to the truth with that statement. I believe that eventually we will all be backed into CIM, SGGM or one of the "shells" and after we have all been moved, with our new shares, and along with the "assets", CMKX would be left as a shell. That would definitely take someone with RG's expertise to keep the company "between the white lines".

I agree with everyone who thinks we should be informed of what is going on. But that information will not come until the time is right. It doesn't matter how impatient any of us are, RG will not allow any announcements until the right time. When will Microsoft announce to their shareholders what their researchers are creating in the labs? When will Disney announce their next acquisition to shareholders? Do you show your poker hand right after the ante?

IP: Logged

Upside
Member
posted September 15, 2004 01:14     Click Here to See the Profile for Upside     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
originally posted by noahltl:
quote:
When will Microsoft announce to their shareholders what their researchers are creating in the labs?

Well, with the X-Box it was about a year before it came out, the demo of their directx drivers were being shown at shows well in advance of implementation, Windows 95 had a coming out party planned a year in advance, Windows XP was being talked about in the late 90's, need more?

IP: Logged

Upside
Member
posted September 15, 2004 01:18     Click Here to See the Profile for Upside     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
originally posted by noahltl:
quote:
When will Disney announce their next acquisition to shareholders?

The only one I remember there was the Disney/Pixar fiasco a number of years ago. It failed but the shareholders knew about it as it was happening, not after the fact.

IP: Logged

lanebro
Member
posted September 15, 2004 01:20     Click Here to See the Profile for lanebro     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Upside:
Everyones screaming for facts about this company, I've got a few.

{Lanebro's chosen paragraph}:
Fact: CMKX's land claims do not appear on any Government published claim map. The only place you will see their name is on the maps printed and published by CMKX for their own promotional purposes.


I have to laugh here; last weekend I saw what appearred to be UC, et al, owning most of the Sask area land claims in Canada, on the reverse side of Jim Dunn's hero card! Seemingly covered same mass as US (at a glance) LOL.
Sorry, I tossed it into the trash, like most NHRA fans did. I'll keep the next one I take, in Reading, PA....

In all seriousness though,, I sure hope our/ my drag racing does not suffer because of this ****.

IP: Logged

noahltl
New Member
posted September 15, 2004 01:24     Click Here to See the Profile for noahltl     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Upside:
originally posted by noahltl:
Well, with the X-Box it was about a year before it came out, the demo of their directx drivers were being shown at shows well in advance of implementation, Windows 95 had a coming out party planned a year in advance, Windows XP was being talked about in the late 90's, need more?


I'm betting they didn't release it until the copyright / patents were filed. That's what RG is doing now, getting all the paperwork in order before any annoucnements are made.

IP: Logged

noahltl
New Member
posted September 15, 2004 01:27     Click Here to See the Profile for noahltl     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
It's been fun guys, but it's late in Indiana. We'll pick it up tomorrow if you want.

IP: Logged

Upside
Member
posted September 15, 2004 01:27     Click Here to See the Profile for Upside     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
originally posted by noahltl:
quote:
I'm betting they didn't release it until the copyright / patents were filed. That's what RG is doing now, getting all the paperwork in order before any annoucnements are made.

Could be, no way of knowing after the fact.

IP: Logged

trgfunds
Member
posted September 15, 2004 01:42     Click Here to See the Profile for trgfunds     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
FWIW, it seems as if everyone who has a lowtrades account has gotten their UCAD dividends. I have them showing up deposited and moved to location 1R restricted on my statement and confirmed this with them over the phone. payout ratio was .0000155/share

[This message has been edited by trgfunds (edited September 15, 2004).]

IP: Logged

bill1352
Member
posted September 15, 2004 08:26     Click Here to See the Profile for bill1352     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
well i'm glad everyone in here is so happy...lol... i'm also glad to see someone else can understand that the restricted part of ucad means that it has to be covered by then...mm's can not buy restricted shares of anything, they can only come from the T/A no place else so if they intend to cover it will be in the next 9 days if that doesn't happen then they are not going to cover period. and if the cim numbers are right on OTC BB then you can forget any cover as they sold twice the a/s but again that is not possible because of the amount of shares sold per day it would take to get to 1.6 trillion. my guess is the real & naked shares together came out around 400 billion probably the 483 billion we first had for ucad split the 300 billion UC added was the cover. it gave him control of the company back & it gave the folks holding naked shares real shares. the mm's probably said forget it we aren't covering. the numbers on the final CIM split will tell

IP: Logged

lanebro
Member
posted September 15, 2004 09:53     Click Here to See the Profile for lanebro     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
[QUOTE]Originally posted by secman:
[B]Ouch it bounced from .0002 to .0003 all day and never touched .0004 lol.. STOCK PLAY OF A LIFE TIME MY ASS with 800 a/s this pig isn't going anywhere down even with paid pumpers sterling, Green barron , melvin etc pumping with lies and the most bull**** theories I have ever heard. Sterling is NOT a stock trader ... CMKX is the only investment he has... yet he comes up with the most bull**** theories I ever heard and the goofy hick dopes that goes to the drag races buy it all..[B][QUOTE]


Excuse me SECMAN, but it appears us HICKS have already figured out what most can't accept. Remember the trash can at Indy? There won't be any legit drag racers nor fans at the party in Vegas- we have better things to do that weekend, like RACING.
Oh, I did see some of those free CMK t-shirts being worn at INDY- on the guys that pumped out the waste tanks on my coach!

IP: Logged

TradingWizard
Member
posted September 15, 2004 09:55     Click Here to See the Profile for TradingWizard     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I you guys really think that things can repeat itself in history you are dreaming - CMKX is not MS and is not Coca Cola and is not Qbid or anything else - these are all different scenarios. CMKX = CMKX with unknown future at this point unless diamonds are found or else.

------------------
'Alone we can do so little; together we can do so much.' - Helen Keller

IP: Logged

TradingWizard
Member
posted September 15, 2004 09:59     Click Here to See the Profile for TradingWizard     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Couple of things on the air:

"Today's interview will be with the "Green Baron" regarding CMKX and UCAD - Canadian Minerals Inc. A webcast with UCAD's CEO - Rendal Williams will be available Wednesday morning at http://thegreenbaron.com .

The Green Baron has also graciously accepted an invitation to do a POINT/COUNTERPOINT style interview next Tuesday with the founder of StockPatrol.com, Hartley Bernstein. At the time of this release, we are awaiting a response from Mr. Bernstein. It is one of CT's greatest desires that investors be fully informed before making any investment decision.

Callers wishing to express their opinion on CMKX or other issues, can reach CT live in the studio at 623-936-4230."
http://www.emediawire.com/releases/2004/9/emw157724.htm

IP: Logged

WinsumLosesum
Member
posted September 15, 2004 10:04     Click Here to See the Profile for WinsumLosesum     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by will:

I know alot of folks hang their hat on R.G., could it not be possible he is there to keep CMKX between the white lines while they sell off claims and leave a worthless shell? Is that not a possibility?]

Just as long as they keep hooking us up with pieces of the other companies as a going away present, I'm OK with that.

IP: Logged

WinsumLosesum
Member
posted September 15, 2004 10:10     Click Here to See the Profile for WinsumLosesum     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Regarding the theory that Mr. Glenn is here just to keep the next Enron out of jail, I decided to email vkoulouris@EdwardsAngell. com this morning. I'll post the reply, if any.

Good morning

My name is xxxxx. I am a loyal shareholder of CMKM Diamond Inc. I am a regular poster on the Allstocks.com message board.

As you can imagine, your man, D. Roger Glenn's name comes up frequently on the board. Now, some see CMKX as the "stock play of a lifetime," while others see it as the "scam of a lifetime." Either way, the reputation of Mr. Glenn and your company is now inextricably linked.

Please be aware that a poster on Allstocks.com, with the user name, Wallace#1, in a post dated September 14, 2004 22:18, brought the following accusation to the board:

"Glenn? Guaranteed that in three months time the company could have been brought into a reporting mode and filing with the SEC. Where was he when the company refused, forgot or whatever to disclose the increase of 300 billion authorized shares? Guaranteed he is there to keep things legal so they can get away with what they have been doing with out criminal prosecution. How does that protect the shareholders? "
http://www.allstocks.com/stockmessageboard/ubb/Forum8/HTML/008861-21.html

How do you respond?

Thank you.

Sincerely,

IP: Logged


This topic is 53 pages long:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53 

All times are ET (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Open Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  
Hop to:

Contact Us | Allstocks.com Home Page

© 1997 - 2004 Allstocks.com. All rights reserved.

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a