Thread Closed  Topic Closed
  Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board
  Micro Penny Stocks, Penny Stocks Under $0.10
  CMKX ... VI ... The Saga Continues (Page 40)

Post New Topic  
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!
This topic is 53 pages long:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53 
next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   CMKX ... VI ... The Saga Continues
netsec
Member
posted September 27, 2004 15:27     Click Here to See the Profile for netsec     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Hey Wallace#1, this has been bugging me for awhile now, I for the most part don't agree with Noah or JBCak when they start ranting about all the postive things do to with CMKX, but I know they own the stock, I can therefore see where they are coming from.

It is just hard for me to fathom why you post on this thread. I can see posting a couple of times to add your 2 cents but to continually post when you have no vested interest in the stock lends to the notion that you have some ulterior reason for being here. Quite frankly I don't believe in the whole "paid basher" myth but you come close on some days in my opionion of proving there is meat behind the myth. I know you have said in the past that you want to help "newbies" but it seems for the most part you are here solely to disagree with anything postive written by share holders about the stock. They might be dreaming but at least you know where they are coming from.

This is just my opionion from watching you post here for the last few months.

IP: Logged

noahltl
New Member
posted September 27, 2004 15:51     Click Here to See the Profile for noahltl     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
With the above post, I think it is prudent for me to take a leave from this thread for awhile. If not, the bashers will use it to further bash me personally. If any here are interested in anything I post, I will be over at the Christian Traders board with Debi and some others that have already bailed here. Bahers; I'm not running away, believe me I would rather stay here and butt heads with you all day. But when me, and my personal situation becomes the subject here, instead of CMKX, it is time to take my leave. Hopefully Allstocks will come up with a way to prevent what has happened here for months, from happening again. When they do, I will probably come back, just like a "bad penny". LOL GOT CMKX?

IP: Logged

JBCak47
Member
posted September 27, 2004 15:54     Click Here to See the Profile for JBCak47     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Justice... lololol....

-John-

IP: Logged

JBCak47
Member
posted September 27, 2004 15:57     Click Here to See the Profile for JBCak47     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Noah, I understand what you are saying...

This thread is teeming with them...


-Byrd-

IP: Logged

dwman
Member
posted September 27, 2004 16:20     Click Here to See the Profile for dwman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Justhis1ce:
dw-----save your bandwith old son, he was just another miserable little pubic hair on the public urinal that is his life that got p***ed off

I guess I have to say you should share the post of the day award with, I believe, Will.

IP: Logged

Wallace#1
Member
posted September 27, 2004 16:20     Click Here to See the Profile for Wallace#1     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
netsec,

The problem with CMKX is that there are few if any positive things about it to post. The few positive things existing have been redundantly posted time after time. On the other hand, they (CMKX) keep doing (and not doing) one stupid fact after another. Further, there are far more protagonists on this thread than so-called bashers or negative posters.

That, basically, is why I cannot say anything positive about CMKX. As a result of all those numerous opposing facts, I do feel they must be presented...and they have been many times. Not just by me, but also by others, including CMKX shareholders. Some seem to want them reposted time after time. They know what said opposing facts are and cannot provide any logical defense whatsoever. Further, I don't much care if anyone calls me a basher. If CMKX is not a scam, it certainly bears all the earmarks of one. For your and others' sakes, I hope it is not. I cannot fathom how all the opposing facts can so easily be ignored or spun.

I have owned CMKX and I have sold CMKX. To me, it is simply just another stock where I may or may not be able to make money. I never "fall in love" with any stock".

I think a lot of newbies here have been sucked into buying CMKX as a result of some of the major posters here and on other boards...and that, as far as I am concerned, is a disservice. Readers should at least be able to consider dissenting points of view. Although many holders of CMKX on this thread consider that negative, I do not. I take a strictly objective approach.

As far as I can determine with valid DD and logical observations of CMKX convolutions and activities, the only thing CMKX has going for it is a remote possibility of finding diamonds...and they seem to be doing little or nothing to advance that objective.
In reality, they seem to be doing everything other than finding diamonds. You know those facts as well.

As far as whatever time I spend on this thread is concerned, if you count the number of my posts vs those of others, you will find that others post much, much more than I do. No offense to him, but noahltl is a very good example...and I do not blame him for posting his views. How in hell do you think there will be a forum with exchanges of facts, ideas, theories and opinions if there are no dissenting (positive or negative) points of view?

Another reason I post here is because I find the thought processes both fascinating and interesting...and in many cases comical (with the exception of one or more posters). In many ways, this is truly the blind leading the blind...and, in real life, even the blind do a better job of it. No offense to anyone, but it is quite obvious that the majority of posters here, and who are also CMKX shareholders, have little experience.

Enough for now. Got to get back to bashing. LOL

IP: Logged

sdrobert
Member
posted September 27, 2004 16:58     Click Here to See the Profile for sdrobert     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
wallace what would be a stock that you seem to like??

IP: Logged

bill1352
Member
posted September 27, 2004 17:02     Click Here to See the Profile for bill1352     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
wallace i do agree with a lot in that last post and yes reading some of the drug induced theories from other boards is entertaining. i'm a problem solver by nature and in my job so with all involved around cmkx i find trying to piece things together interesting. but i own cmkx and any newbies that come in here will see all the bad and the little good points from mine and a few other shareholders posts. if you read my posts (i'll only speak for myself) you won't find any pie-in-the-sky dreams. if fact i've stated that if it wasn't for 2 or 3 points i'd say it was a scam too. i'm not alone in this. you of course have every right to be here & post here but you have to accept that if a person only posts bad with no hope or positive & doesn't own shares, the only word that comes to mind is basher. i'm just stating my opinion not trying to fight or argue and no offense is intended.

IP: Logged

Money_Penny
Member
posted September 27, 2004 17:06     Click Here to See the Profile for Money_Penny     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Wallace#1:
I take a strictly objective approach.

No offense Wally but calling CMKX a "SCAM" without having irrefutable proof is not being objective. I just thought I had to say that and now I'll go back into stealth mode.

[This message has been edited by Money_Penny (edited September 27, 2004).]

IP: Logged

sdrobert
Member
posted September 27, 2004 17:20     Click Here to See the Profile for sdrobert     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I just want to say since there is no proof either way to bash or pump this stock is not good. just need to wait and see what happens. name calling is kind of dumb since no one knows anything other than facts that have come out through pr's the only problem the pr's dont always say alot and pumpers and bashers are trying too hard to read between the lines when there probably isnt anything to read in there. for the most part the prs have been good not great enough to pump and not bad enough to bash. oh well hope this one unfolds someday hopefully before 2008 as I predicted or the nonsence will continue.

IP: Logged

tradingpennys
Member
posted September 27, 2004 17:23     Click Here to See the Profile for tradingpennys     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by will:
Melvin in one of his paltalk visits said the only office he knew of was in Urban's home.
That's what did it for Tamie:

Tamie
Member posted September 01, 2004 10:12


--------------
When I heard that news, I was taken aback too.

IP: Logged

Wallace#1
Member
posted September 27, 2004 19:02     Click Here to See the Profile for Wallace#1     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Noahltl,

Get your butt back here and fight like a man against offensive remarks such as made by is300. You are not the first and will not be the last to whom such things happen.

Yes, he was wrong. Just as wrong as you and
others were when you began your personal
attacks against me. Just as you and others were when you questioned my handicap. Just as wrong as you and others were when you questioned my Wall Street experience and my having worked at the NYSE. Just as wrong as you and others were when you questioned my honesty, integrity and credibility.
Not one of those things had anything to do with CMKX. And, having to do with CMKX, just as wrong as when you, Debi, Upside and others questioned my purchase of CMKX at .0001.

Most, including yourself, just added to fuel to the fire or even started the fires. Now, you are running off like a dog with it’s tail between his legs? Now you know what a small part of what you, Debi, JBCak,and many others did and you cannot take it? You got
your handicap attacked once. I got mine attacked at least five times, had my life threatened twice, was wished dead a few times, had my wife insulted, had my mother insulted and had a dauther that died insulted.

I may disagree with you, but I think you have more in you than hiding out on a thread where you will get little more than 100% agreement.

Although I would prefer it otherwise, you don’t have to like me and I don’t have to like you. Stop being a whining wimp and get back here and give me some challenges. If I could take all I got shoveled in my face in the past, you sure as hell should be able to as well.

Kind regards...and NO OFFENSE INTENDED

IP: Logged

Wallace#1
Member
posted September 27, 2004 19:19     Click Here to See the Profile for Wallace#1     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Money_Penny,

As I just previously stated, CMKX has all the earmarks of a SCAM as I know a SCAM.
I don't recall specifically saying CMKX is a SCAM. I did, however, use the "If it talks like a duck" analogy suggesting it is a SCAM.
Why do you feel that is so horrible?

Am I not allowed to say what I think on this thread? It was about CMKX, as opposed to some of the things you followed up with in response JBCak/byrdturd insults.

IP: Logged

Ruh420
Member
posted September 27, 2004 19:38     Click Here to See the Profile for Ruh420     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
If I was the ceo of a scam company, i'd do it like lsta, prim, etc, etc etc...nice and quiet like.

I wouldn't be a public figure who has personally met probably hundreds of shareholders, signed on however many scam companys.

I wouldn't own a VERY public racing team, let alone 3??.

I wouldn't feel safe scamming 40,000+ people, knowing there have already been death threats towards employees(IMO re: Melvin on paltalk).

I wouldn't involve my extended family.. unless we were a crime family of course.

I wouldn't be joining one of these other scam companies in a Las Vegas party with 4-6000+ already RSVP'd.

This, just like most things in life, is nothing more then point of view. There is mine. Have fun.

IP: Logged

highwaychild
Member
posted September 27, 2004 20:15     Click Here to See the Profile for highwaychild     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
WALLY wrote...I did, however, use the "If it talks like a duck" analogy suggesting it is a SCAM.


Oh,NOW you're into analogies...

If it is, it could be the biggest duck that ever quacked.

If not ,it could be the big alligator.And it came up out of the merkiest of waters.And kills your little duck analogy!

You say you have experience.How many diamond mining Co.'s with millions of $'s thrown at them like in the CMKX(@.0003!) pr's?OK, then give some examples.

IP: Logged

WinsumLosesum
Member
posted September 27, 2004 20:20     Click Here to See the Profile for WinsumLosesum     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Ruh420:
If I was the ceo of a scam company, i'd do it like lsta, prim, etc, etc etc...nice and quiet like.

I wouldn't be a public figure who has personally met probably hundreds of shareholders, signed on however many scam companys.

I wouldn't own a VERY public racing team, let alone 3??.

I wouldn't feel safe scamming 40,000+ people, knowing there have already been death threats towards employees(IMO re: Melvin on paltalk).

I wouldn't involve my extended family.. unless we were a crime family of course.

I wouldn't be joining one of these other scam companies in a Las Vegas party with 4-6000+ already RSVP'd.

This, just like most things in life, is nothing more then point of view. There is mine. Have fun.


Enron.

IP: Logged

TradingWizard
Member
posted September 27, 2004 20:22     Click Here to See the Profile for TradingWizard     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Bre-X

IP: Logged

highwaychild
Member
posted September 27, 2004 20:24     Click Here to See the Profile for highwaychild     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by WinsumLosesum:
Enron.

Diamond mines.But funny.

IP: Logged

WinsumLosesum
Member
posted September 27, 2004 20:33     Click Here to See the Profile for WinsumLosesum     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by highwaychild:
Diamond mines.But funny.

Actually, it's not funny at all. Being a very public figure and throwing parties is what Enron was all about. Ken Lay was more visible than being at a race track. He was interviewed on CNBC, for crying out loud.

I want this to be legit. I have 10M reasons. But I'm looking to put my faith in something other than UC's "public-ness."

And here's where I find comfort. I admit that I know very little about the mining industry. I would feel more comfortable if I knew what experts think about CMKX. And then I look at the list of mining companies (experts) who are scrambling for a piece of the CMKX pie, and THAT's how I can sleep at night.

IP: Logged

sdrobert
Member
posted September 27, 2004 21:45     Click Here to See the Profile for sdrobert     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Wallace, you never said what you thought was a good penny stock to invest in just wanted to see your thoughts so I can possibly broaden my possition if it sounds like something good.

IP: Logged

Wallace#1
Member
posted September 27, 2004 22:00     Click Here to See the Profile for Wallace#1     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Winsum,

You wrote:
I look at the list of mining companies (experts) who are scrambling for a piece of the CMKX pie, and THAT's how I can sleep at night.
-----------------------------------
I would have to agree with you if maybe DeBeers, Shore Gold, Kensington or some other successful and reputable company was involved in the scrambling. Then, I could see some possibilities.

However, to the best of my knowledge, not one of the companies involved with CMKX show any earnings, some don't even file with the SEC and information is not made public. In addition, there are many other companies owned or controlled by the Casavant family that could become more involved, and to my knowledge, are also not showing earnings.

IP: Logged

highwaychild
Member
posted September 27, 2004 22:18     Click Here to See the Profile for highwaychild     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by sdrobert:
Wallace, you never said what you thought was a good penny stock to invest in just wanted to see your thoughts so I can possibly broaden my possition if it sounds like something good.

Good luck...Doubt you'll hear anything come out of him.Unless it's something he thinks can post determinantal to CMKX.It's like an obsession...(or paid to do).That's what he does.

IP: Logged

Wallace#1
Member
posted September 27, 2004 22:30     Click Here to See the Profile for Wallace#1     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
sdrobert and highwaychild,

No dice. Looks like a set-up to me.

Might suggest you look for pennys with positive earnings. Most pennys end up in the dumper. Guess I am bashing pennys now, huh? OK.

Gone now for the evening.

[This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited September 27, 2004).]

IP: Logged

Justhis1ce
Member
posted September 27, 2004 22:50     Click Here to See the Profile for Justhis1ce     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
August Focus Stock: CMKM Diamonds (CMKX)

CMKM Diamonds Announces Stock

Will be Paid on Oct. 6, 2004

Corporate Attorney Makes Comments on Filing Status

Last Friday, September 24 CMKM Diamonds, Inc. (CMKX) announced that the dividend of U.S. Canadian Minerals Inc. (UCAD) stock will be paid on October 6, 2004 rather than today. “The delay was because of the enormous amount of administrative work that needs to be done by the transfer agents for both companies in order to make that distribution,” stated CEO Urban Casavant. “We do not anticipate any further delays in paying the dividend.” The record date for the dividend remains unchanged.

CMKX corporate attorney D. Roger Glenn stated later in the press release, “The company’s accountants are working to complete the audit of the company’s financial statements. When that has been accomplished, the company will be well on its way to becoming a fully reporting company again.”

It appears the UCAD dividend will be about 9.6 shares of UCAD for every one million shares of CMKX owed on the record date (although this number can still change). In the press release, it was noted that UCAD’s management agreed to issue additional shares for the round-up process for its distribution. Although the distribution seems to indicate that CMKX will pay out the UCAD dividend based on about 780 billion shares, The Green Baron Report believes CMKX is using a number close to the total authorized number of shares, and not the outstanding number of shares. We do not believe CMKX has issued the additional 300 billion shares it authorized back in August, but is holding these shares for possible acquisitions or joint partnerships.

The Green Baron Report is not concerned over the brief delay in the dividend payout. In a personal experience with one account due UCAD shares, the account originally was credited unrestricted, free trading shares of UCAD. The broker was immediately called by the back office to be sure not to allow any possible UCAD sells to go through because the shares were supposed to have been restricted. We are not exactly sure why there is a delay in correcting the problem, but we do expect delivery of restricted UCAD shares on October 6. (Note: there was no intent to sell the UCAD shares even if free trading)

It has been made clear to us that D. Roger Glenn was not only hired to get CMKX fully reporting, but also deal with share structure issues, achieve listing on a higher exchange, and handle issues related to a possible short position. We have been told that Mr. Glenn plans to attend and make a speech at the CMKX/UCAD shareholder event scheduled in Las Vegas on the weekend of October 29-31. The Green Baron Report views Mr. Glenn’s continued involvement with CMKX as vital, and a clear indication that the company is headed on the right path. At this point it is impossible to speculate on a date as to when CMKX will become fully reporting and attain a Bulletin Board listing, but we are confident that Mr. Glenn’s influence will speed up the process significantly.

Ed Miller, CEO of our parent company, was extremely pleased following this last weekend’s trip to Dallas. Although CEO Urban Casavant was not in attendance, Mr. Ed Dhonau and Mr. Rendal Williams representing U.S. Canadian Minerals (UCAD) were available to answer some questions. The Green Baron Report would like to convey to our members that we believe Mr. Dhonau and Mr. Williams are very impressive, experienced, top-notch businessmen. They are entirely dedicated and committed to the short and long-term success of CMKM Diamonds and U.S. Canadian Minerals.

Once again, our visit to a CMKX related event has resulted in brimming confidence. An outside contact of The Green Baron from the West Coast was able to join Ed Miller in Dallas. He made the journey because he wanted to meet first hand some of the players involved behind the story, and because none of the initial high-flying stock rumors and speculation had panned out. Although we were not encouraged by his bitter and frustrated attitude prior to the visit, he came back a happy, satisfied stockholder that is overtly positive about the prospects of CMKX and UCAD.

During the visit, we learned a great deal about the current and proposed operations of U.S. Canadian Minerals in Ecuador and elsewhere. We gained a much better feeling about the value of claims that CMKX owns in Canada, and the possibility of a revenue stream coming to CMKX in the short-term. We learned that Mr. Dhonau who claims to be one of CMKX’s largest shareholders, is not concerned about the CMKX share structure. Apparently it was Mr. Dhonau who helped secure Roger Glenn as corporate attorney for CMKX, and has been instrumental in helping bring new investment interest to Mr. Casavant. We learned that these men still believe a short position exists, and the “trap has been set”. We learned a great many other things that help us maintain our original confidence.

Perhaps this might be a good time to reiterate The Green Baron’s position on CMKX. Our parent company, Evergreen Marketing, has not sold a single share of stock since we took positions in July and August. We still believe that the best time to have purchased CMKX was when we upgraded CMKX to a fully profiled stock on August 9 and before all dividend record dates had hit (although we believe .0003 is very attractive). Even though we will not forecast price targets or projections without more information, we maintain that based on all press releases and public information about CMKX, independent due diligence, and data from other companies that hold mineral claims in the Fort a La Corne area, that CMKX remains significantly undervalued. In our boldest statement to date, we no longer feel it is a matter of if, but when CMKX becomes the Stock Play of a Lifetime!

Here's a bit more on The Duck, FWIW
Still long, still strong.

IP: Logged

lanebro
Member
posted September 28, 2004 00:39     Click Here to See the Profile for lanebro     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by JBCak47:
NETSEC

ASK BOB FREY IF YOU REALLY THINK THAT.


-John-



Bob Frey? Hmmm. The plot thickens.

IP: Logged

Ruh420
Member
posted September 28, 2004 01:39     Click Here to See the Profile for Ruh420     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by WinsumLosesum:
Enron.

Point taken.
They have their similarities.
But..
Enron wasn't a pinksheet it was a huge corporation.

If I remember right, someone did die over it?
Suicide if I remember right, unless it was a assasination/coverup... LOL

People were convicted.

They had help by overseas bankers who are facing extradition hearings.

And if I understand right, Ken Lay the CEO wasn't the puppetmaster calling all the shots, it looks like executives who got too deep into the cow patties and ended up burying the shareholders in them.

That one sucked even more because of how many people lost most if not all of their retirements over it.

So back to my point of view/opinion... ****IMO****:Pinksheets scams like to scam quietly, maybe throw out a bunch of nice pr's to get the fundamental bunch into the fray and BAMM.. owned.... :P

Of course, that's not the only reason I hold my shares.

3.3 mil @ .0004x avg

IP: Logged

dwman
Member
posted September 28, 2004 09:07     Click Here to See the Profile for dwman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I found this on another board. Since I don't see it posted earlier, here it is.

Posted by: zeninvestor32 Date:9/27/2004 1:47:04 PM
Post # 14606 http://tinyurl.com/5j695

THIS IS A REALLY EXCELLENT POST.

Onyx Pup posted this earlier from RB. It's very interesting to me and let me explain why. Again, I am not a securities attorney, so I do not know all the filing requirements or procedural issues that Roger may be addressing. But one thing I have wondered is whether CMKX would simply file a 10K with the SEC to become reporting again or whether they would approach this under the full-blown process of being listed with the otcc bb. If the latter, it explains a LOT. I had a friend whose company went through the approval process for listing on the otc bb awhile back. The process took around 9 months. It was brutal. You submit all your information to the SEC and await their comments. They will tag you on everything which you and your auditors have to then resubmit for a second round of "comments". My friend actually had to do a third round. It took a long while. But then again, he was not using a top-notch attorney and not using a top-notch CPA. My guess is that someone greatly familiar with SEC compliance like Roger (particularly if he has contacts there as a former SEC man) can get some expedited feedback. Still, if they are doing this the all-out way to become an otc bb listed company, the process is grueling and takes time. Roger has now been at it almost 4 months. If he has had his ducks in a row (and I'm guessing he has), I would not at all be surprised for the process to be nearly through. Roger probably has a pretty good idea at this stage on how much longer this process will take and can coordinate the "plan" around it.

But let me tell you. What REALLY excites me if in fact they are doing this is that this means the SEC has complete and full disclosure from CMKX. This means the company has basically laid every financial and every deal on CMKX in the last 5 years probably bare and available for the SEC to inspect. And THIS would be why, despite all the absolute absurdity in the stock's trading, there has been no investigation into CMKX and no halt. SEC would have everything. There wouldn't be a need to investigate. The SEC can see every step ever taken and understand what and why is happening. And since there has been no halt or problems, this is key. This would ultimately be a very smart move by Roger. Lay yourself prostrate before the SEC and then when they sign off on everything, YOU ARE GOOD TO GO. The downside is the timing issue. You just don't have control over the SEC's schedule or their comments. But if this is handled properly, and I suspect if anyone would handle it properly it's Roger, this is indeed a very big move for cmkx. What would it mean in the short term (unknown as to exact time frame):

1. Fully reporting on otcbb which makes the stock available for institutional/fund purchases (i still wish it was going to amex where credibility runs much higher)
2. SEC blessing on CMKX financials puts all bashers to rest
3. Full disclosure of every nit about CMKX
4. Company will now be committed to complete and total disclosure of alll future deals

I like where this is going. The last PR's comment about the auditors at work and becomeing fully reporting was important to me. If in fact Roger has CMKX's financials in front of the SEC and already through any comments phases, we are all going to be very, very, very happy imo.

Here's the link to the post I think is very interesting:
http://www.ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CLB01219&read=87359


Z

As always, these are my personal opinions.

IP: Logged

dwman
Member
posted September 28, 2004 09:29     Click Here to See the Profile for dwman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Very interesting! Yesterday at close, my Fidelity account showed a negative 1 billion plus vol. This morning before open, it showed a positive value just under 40 million.

IP: Logged

valves
Member
posted September 28, 2004 09:32     Click Here to See the Profile for valves     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
St. George Metals, Inc. Announces Final Payment of $2,500,000 Delivered to CMKM Diamonds, Inc.
9/28/2004 9:30:00 AM




VEGREVILLE, Alberta, Sep 28, 2004 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- St. George Metals, Inc. (Pink Sheets:SGGM) is pleased to announce that the Company has delivered the 4th and final payment of $2,500,000 U.S. Dollars to CMKM Diamonds, Inc. (Pink Sheets:CMKX) totaling now $10,000,000 U.S. Dollars of the $10,000,000 U.S.D. joint venture agreement between St. George Metals, Inc. and CMKM Diamonds, Inc.

In consideration for $10,000,000 US Dollars and two hundred billion (200,000,000,000) restricted shares of SGGM St. George Metals, Inc. will purchase a 5% unencumbered and absolute interest in any and all mineral claims held by CMKM Diamonds, Inc.

There is no guarantee that further exploration or drilling will produce any economic benefit to the company or the shareholders of the company.

This press release contains "forward-looking" statements as that term is defined by Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 (the "Securities Act"), as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), as amended. All statements that are included in this press release other than statements of historical fact are "forward-looking" statements. Although management believes that the expectations reflecting in these forward-looking statements are reasonable, it can give no assurance that such expectations will prove to have been correct. Important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from the expectations as disclosed herein, including without limitation, in conjunction with these forward-looking statements contained in this press release.

SOURCE: St. George Metals, Inc.

St. George Metals, Inc.
Investor Relations:
Vicki Curran, 877-632-3133


Customize your Business Wire news & multimedia to match your needs.
Get breaking news from companies and organizations worldwide.
Logon for FREE today at www.BusinessWire.com.


Copyright (C) 2004 Business Wire. All rights reserved.

IP: Logged

JEAL
Member
posted September 28, 2004 10:53     Click Here to See the Profile for JEAL     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Holy cow -

Awfully quiet in here......

IP: Logged

dwman
Member
posted September 28, 2004 10:56     Click Here to See the Profile for dwman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by JEAL:
Holy cow -

Awfully quiet in here......


shhhhh You woke me up.

IP: Logged

pappy
Member
posted September 28, 2004 11:48     Click Here to See the Profile for pappy     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
WOW 3.5 BIL SHARES TRADED ALREADY

IP: Logged

JBCak47
Member
posted September 28, 2004 11:53     Click Here to See the Profile for JBCak47     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
"JBCak/byrdturd insults"

Wow, have you been up all night crying in your pillow... remember sticks and stones...

-Byrd-

IP: Logged

bill1352
Member
posted September 28, 2004 12:00     Click Here to See the Profile for bill1352     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
well good for cmkx....wonder if UC it going to add sggm shares to our dividend list..not that we ever get any of them...lol

IP: Logged

sdrobert
Member
posted September 28, 2004 12:22     Click Here to See the Profile for sdrobert     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
interesting wallace does not give a good pick but only a good smear.

IP: Logged

JEAL
Member
posted September 28, 2004 12:40     Click Here to See the Profile for JEAL     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
We want NOAH, We want NOAH, We want NOAH

* as the crowd cheers *

IP: Logged

tic_toc
Member
posted September 28, 2004 13:16     Click Here to See the Profile for tic_toc     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
tbo452
Dr. Of Diamonds


member is online


Gender:
Posts: 227

*** NEW GEMM Dividend Info ***
« Thread started on: Today at 11:59am »
From OTCBB...

CMKX - CMKM Diamonds, Inc. Common Stock

Declaration Date:

-- Ex Date:

-- Record Date:
10/01/2004

Payment Date:
11/15/2004

Dividend Type:
Stock Div. payable in another company

Dividend Amount:
+stk

Notes:
+Approximately .00012267 of a restricted share of Juina Mining Corp (OTC: GEMM) for each share held. Will not be quoted Ex.

« Last Edit: Today at 12:01pm by tbo452 »

IP: Logged

tic_toc
Member
posted September 28, 2004 13:18     Click Here to See the Profile for tic_toc     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
http://www.otcbb.com/asp/dividend.asp?sym_id=CMKX&dDate=10/01/2004&sDateType=Record_date

Hurrah for a 778 billion OS!!!

IP: Logged

glassman
Member
posted September 28, 2004 13:22     Click Here to See the Profile for glassman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
LOL!

IP: Logged

bill1352
Member
posted September 28, 2004 14:22     Click Here to See the Profile for bill1352     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
you would think that with 10 mil. coming in they would have bought the other 24% of gemm and given out those shares too. but then gemm is the only company in this whole group actually digging something worth more then dirt out of the ground. guess that explains not getting the other 24%

IP: Logged

bill1352
Member
posted September 28, 2004 14:26     Click Here to See the Profile for bill1352     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
ok we have 2 dividends paying out just under 800 billion o/s & 1 at a 1.6 trillion o/s. i think we should start a charity drive here...lets send the cmkx accountants a few new calculators. the ones they are using seem to be broke

IP: Logged

bill1352
Member
posted September 28, 2004 14:38     Click Here to See the Profile for bill1352     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
122.67 shares per million shares or $4.29345 of gemm stock per million shares. i have 2,062,000 shares of cmkx so i get 250 shares of gemm or $8.75. if i sell it costs $10.99...good deal for me i think...lol. its nice that frank is thinking of us shareholders by giving us shares in other companies but i'm starting to wish he wouldn't. 1 dividend if not handled right by the company may cost $250 after the restriction is lifted to sell. 1 dividend isn't a tradeable stock & 1 costs more then its worth to sell...lol

IP: Logged

Wallace#1
Member
posted September 28, 2004 15:01     Click Here to See the Profile for Wallace#1     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Bill1352
Don't forget all those claims with fantastic potential. Whose are those? I'd also be careful about SGGM...expect "par for the course".

sdrobert,
Guess I figured that one right! Give me one "good" reason why I should give you a tip. Here's one - CMKX...right off the bottom of a dairy farmer's boot.

IP: Logged

bill1352
Member
posted September 28, 2004 15:22     Click Here to See the Profile for bill1352     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Wallace#1
Member posted September 28, 2004 15:01
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bill1352
Don't forget all those claims with fantastic potential. Whose are those? I'd also be careful about SGGM...expect "par for the course".

=========================================

truth is nobody knows what those claims will bring. there is enough proof that they own something that has a real shot at diamonds. i'm sure you know i'm not a believer in the stock play of a lifetime idea but i do think that in the next yr or 2 my $850 could become $8500 and every broker out there aims for a 20% return per yr. that gives me 4 1/2 more yrs of waiting. plus where else can i read stuff from drug filled pumpers & hate filled bashers, have a company mess with my mind, watch mm's manipulate the heck out of a pps and if it does tank by owning stock I can have the dubious honor of being part of the biggest stock scam in the history of the market...lol

IP: Logged

JEAL
Member
posted September 28, 2004 15:23     Click Here to See the Profile for JEAL     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Wallace -

You baffle me

IP: Logged

JEAL
Member
posted September 28, 2004 16:16     Click Here to See the Profile for JEAL     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
CORRECTING and REPLACING U.S. Canadian Minerals Inc. Exercises Additional Purchase of CMKM Diamonds Inc.'s Mineral Claims for $2,500,000 USD
Tuesday September 28, 3:58 pm ET


LAS VEGAS--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Sept. 28, 2004--In BW5550 issued Sept. 9, 2004: First graph, third sentence of release dated Sept. 9, 2004, should read: With the exercise of this portion of the option and previous option exercises and transactions with CMKX, UCAD currently holds 8.16% of all of CMKX's mineral claims. (sted With the exercise of this portion of the option and previous option exercises and transactions with CMKX, UCAD currently holds 9.16% of all of CMKX's mineral claims.)
The corrected release reads:

U.S. CANADIAN MINERALS INC. EXERCISES ADDITIONAL PURCHASE OF CMKM DIAMONDS INC.'S MINERAL CLAIMS FOR $2,500,000 USD

U.S. Canadian Minerals Inc. (OTCBB: UCAD - News) announced today that it has exercised a portion of its option with CMKM Diamonds Inc. (Pink Sheets: CMKX - News) to purchase an additional 1.66% interest in all of CMKX's mineral claims for $2,500,000 USD. Under the agreement reached in July, UCAD has a one-year option agreement to purchase up to an aggregate total of 10% interest in all of the mineral claims held by CMKX for a total of $15 million USD payable to CMKM Diamonds Inc. With the exercise of this portion of the option and previous option exercises and transactions with CMKX, UCAD currently holds 8.16% of all of CMKX's mineral claims. Should UCAD exercise its remaining portion of its option, the company will hold 15% of all of the CMKX mineral claims.

Rendal Williams, CEO of UCAD, stated, "The company expects to exercise additional percentages under the option as we move forward, increasing our holdings and asset base with the acquisition of potentially high revenue properties."

Further details relative to this project will be forthcoming in future press releases and at http://www.uscanadian.net/.

Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995:

Statements contained in this document which are not historical fact are forward-looking statements based upon management's current expectations that are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from those set forth in or implied by forward-looking statements.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Contact:
U.S. Canadian Minerals Inc.
Chris Hanneman, 303-220-8476

IP: Logged

dwman
Member
posted September 28, 2004 16:54     Click Here to See the Profile for dwman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
bill1352 wrote
"where else can i read stuff from drug filled pumpers"

blli, iim not udrg flield. go kmcx

IP: Logged

bill1352
Member
posted September 28, 2004 17:25     Click Here to See the Profile for bill1352     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
wasn't thinking of you dw...more along the lines of zen, dr. d and a few more from rb

[This message has been edited by bill1352 (edited September 28, 2004).]

IP: Logged

bill1352
Member
posted September 28, 2004 17:27     Click Here to See the Profile for bill1352     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
i'm slow dw...just got home haven't had my coffee yet..lol...just got your post

IP: Logged

tic_toc
Member
posted September 28, 2004 17:29     Click Here to See the Profile for tic_toc     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
remember people dr d is on christian traders radio soon.
http://familyvaluesradio.com/index.html

IP: Logged


This topic is 53 pages long:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53 

All times are ET (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Open Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  
Hop to:

Contact Us | Allstocks.com Home Page

© 1997 - 2004 Allstocks.com. All rights reserved.

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a