posted September 29, 2004 17:43            

quote:

---

And not one of you, uncluding Upside, had the guts to post the similarities? Wonder why? Too accurate? "Hit the nail on the head"? Cannot have it all the ways, Up - down, back, forth, in, out, left and right!

As far as this thread is concerned, one of the worst things anyone could have done was pussy foot around about CMKX. Instead, an outspoken proponent against CMKX, chose not to "call a spade a spade". Never took a real stand one way or another, but sure as hell enjoyed himself when the jackals came slinking around. What a disservice!

---

posted September 29, 2004 17:54            

Someone who shall remain nameless to protect his reputation just posted:

{"I'm worried about owning a stock where people due their DD at racetracks by overhearing drunken fools talk about how rich they're going to be."} WELL GET OVER IT !!

BE THAT AS IT MAY, THAT NEITHER HAS NOR WILL HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH MINERAL CLAIMS VALUES IN THE BILLIONS SELLING FOR .0003

Even though you are an extremely conservative kind of person, YOU NEED TO PUT ASIDE ALL YOUR DOUBTS AND BUY IMMEDIATELY AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE.

Yes there is lots of negative crap that could easily deter anybody who is used to INVESTING and has never had much appetite for the RISK of SPECULATION on a penny or SUB-PENNY stock.

HOWEVER, YOU MERELY HAVE TO FOCUS ON THE POSITVE PROBABILITIES:
Here are the first 15 that leap to my mind - THERE ARE MANY MORE!
(all documentation in links below)

1) What is the probablity that D Roger Glenn, who has ONLY Fortune 500 companies for clients would represent a scam? - ZERO ! !

2) What is the probability that CMKX is OVER-valued given the cash flow currently being generated by both Junia Mining (GEMM.ob) from the Yellow River GOLD mine AND by El Capitan (ECPN.ob) from its 17 MILLION tons of IRON ORE per year shipped to the LARGEST STEEL PRODUCER IN CHINA? - ZERO ! !

3) CMKX INTEREST IN GEMM ALONE IMHO WORTH .0006 TO .001
TWICE, MAYBE 3 x, THE CURRENT CMKX BUY PRICE

4) CMKX INTEREST IN ECPN ALONE IMHO WORTH .0006 TO .001
TWICE, MAYBE 3 x, THE CURRENT CMKX BUY PRICE

GEMM & ECPN ARE THE CASH COWS WITHOUT ANY - ZERO - DIAMONDS! !

5) What is the probability that BOTH Kensington / DeBeers AND Shore Gold can pull out good qualaity jewelry grade diamonds less than 6 miles away (each in different directions) from the current cmkx drill site, which is somewhere close to the center of a GIANT KIMBERLIGHT MUSHROOM OREO DEPOSIT OF APPROXIMATLY 8 X 5 MILES IN SIZE (THE "HEAD" OF THE "MUSHROOM"), and that CMKX will not find any diamonds there? - IMHO, ZERO ! !
http://questfordiamonds.com/research/topic5a.htm

6) What is the probabilty that CMKX will find NOTHING on ANY of its TWO MILLION ACRES of Mineral Claims that will add valaue to the current PPS of .0003 ? - ZERO ! !

Kensington / DeBeers is color keyed SKY BLUE
Shore Gold is color keyed OLIVE GREEN

EVERYTHING ELSE IS CMKX OR CMKX+JVPs
http://tinyurl.com/7yg88

7) What is the probability that the repair of the share structure by the resolution of the huge naked short position in CMKX will not POSITIVELY IMPACT the CMKX PPS? - ZERO !!

8) What is the probability that this (shorts covering, structure being repaired) is NOT currently happening, since the daily volume in billions, since dumping would drive the ppS down, AND SINCE BOTH THE CHAIKEN MINEY FLOW AND ACCUMULATION LINE T A INDICATORS CLEARLY SHOW INCREDIBLE BUYING / ACCUMULATION (and NOT selling /distribution /dumping) ? - ZERO ! !
http://tinyurl.com/4gamw

9) What is the probability that the CMKX will not go significantly higher than .0003 once D Roger Glenn gets CMKX FULLY REPORTING AGAIN and Listed AT LEAST on the OTC (as on .ob vs an .pk stock) - ZERO ! !

10) What is the probability that the PPS has any downside on the news of the sale of mineral rights for other types of deposits to other companies? - ZERO ! !

11) What is the probability that the PPS will not experience a HUGE RUN just as soon as the news that GOOD QUALITY DIAMONDS HAVE BEEN DISCOVERED ? - ZERO ! !

12) What is the probability that the PPS will Not go UP on news that CMKX has merged or taken over / bought out any of its J V Partners; or UCAD ? - ZERO ! !

13) What is the probability that CMKX will have insufficient funds available to actually mine anything they want to get out of the ground, in light of MULTIPLE DOZENS OF MILLIONS of DOLLARS ALREADY thrown at CMKX from UCAD, SGGM, the BRITISH Investment Group (BTW, that will start trading TOMORROW, THRS SEPT 30 on London Exchange!) ? - ZERO ! !

14) What is the probability that it is of NO significance that CMKX is ALREADY in a CONTRACTUAL PARTNERSHIP RELATIONSHIP with Rick Kusmirsky, who has VAST experience mining URANIUM for Cameco and one of the largest mining consortiums in the world - The Lundin Group, owned by Adolf Lundin? - ZERO ! !

15) What is the probability that if CMKX needed even more money, that it could not get it as easily as telephoning the CEO of the Israeli company DGI, which desperately wants to acquire diamond producing assetts and is on record as having TWO BILLION US DOLLARS at its disposal to do so? - ZERO ! !

JUST BECAUSE THE CHICKS THAT HANG OUT AT BARS MAY NOT BE THE KIND THAT YOU'D WANT TO TAKE HOME TO MOTHER DOES NOT MEAN THAT THERE ARE NOT PLENTY OF FISH IN THE SEA SHE WOULD LOVE TO SEE YOU WITH!

WHY WOULD YOU LET A FEW DRUNKEN IDIOT NEWBIE INVESTORS KEEP YOU AWAY FROM THE GREATEST PENNY STOCK OPPORTUNITY OF ALL TIME?

WHY LET THE IDIOCY OF OTHERS ECLIPSE THE TREMENDOUS UNDER-VAALUATION OF THE MULTIPLE FUNDAMENTAL REASONS FOR OWNING THIS STOCK?

WHY RISK MISSING OUT ON THE GREATEST SHARE PRICE EXPLOSION OF A LIFETIME - THE ERUPTION OF MOUNT SAINT HELEN'S ?

OR VESUVIOUS?

OR CRACKATOA ?

I can not believe that you do not see the ABSOLUTELY STUPENDOUS FREE MONEY OPPORTUNITY HERE if you have taken just TWO HOURS to read ANYTHING in either

the CMKX folder in {Links} @ ShortSharks http://tinyurl.com/3dn4g

If you do not find ANY TWO OR THREE reasons from the 15 above BOTH SUFFICIENT AND COMPELLING ENOUGH TO BUY CMKX ASAP, then IMHO either you lack rudimantary reading &/or comprehension skills.

Absolutely DUMBFOUNDED at the perception on CMKX by any not yet long & HOLDING FA$T,

jawz_2020

posted September 29, 2004 17:55            

quote:

---

Originally posted by tic_toc:
remember people dr d is on christian traders radio soon.
http://familyvaluesradio.com/index.html

---

It is on now.

posted September 29, 2004 18:14            

"9) What is the probability that the CMKX will not go significantly higher than .0003 once D Roger Glenn gets CMKX FULLY REPORTING AGAIN and Listed AT LEAST on the OTC (as on .ob vs an .pk stock) - ZERO ! ! "

Along with:

Share structure
Sample reporting
Progress of becoming a reporting Co.

posted September 29, 2004 18:48            

I bought in @ .0001 when alot of people were down on it hard.Glad I did too.1/2 my 6 mill. shares are free.Coulda woulda shoulda they all might have been.As much as people want to push or pull CMKX to me it's still high risk high reward.Just how I like it.

Will,you still watching Plasticon(was wkdh?
Thanks for the tip buddy.

posted September 29, 2004 19:38            

I won't pick apart that whole post with the 15 so-called reasons to buy in or stay with CMKX, just a couple for now.

You wrote or reposted:
Yes there is lots of negative crap that could easily deter anybody who is used to INVESTING and has never had much appetite for the RISK of SPECULATION on a penny or SUB-PENNY stock.

A: "Investing" is one thing. "Risk/speculation on a penny stock is little more than gambling.

1) What is the probablity that D Roger Glenn, who has ONLY Fortune 500 companies for clients would represent a scam? - ZERO ! !

A: "ONLY Fortune 500 companies"? Since when did CMKX, UCAD and any number of other companies become such?

PS: Your words are beginning to sound very familiar...expecially the "walk on water" part about Glenn. I wonder....

posted September 29, 2004 20:29            

Read through that site quickly so may have missed a few things.

Anyone ever heard of Crystalix Group International, Inc.?

Where did CMKXTREME.COM come from? Know anything about it?

Noticed that that 8K showed no /s/ for Urban Casavant. Maybe it isn't required for another's 8K?

Noticed also the following:
RECITALS

A. CMKX has agreed to loan to the Company Two Million Dollars
($2,000,000) (the "Loan"), which Loan is convertible into Common Stock and the
Company has agreed to issue to CMKX warrants (the "Warrants") to purchase up to
2,500,000 shares of Common Stock, provided, among other things, that certain
securities registration rights are granted to CMKX.

Why would they be using CMKX's trading symbol? Does CMKX own CMKXTREME.COM?
Where did the $2 mil come from...privately or from CMKX? What was the loan for?

Some digging to do here!!!! Could this 8K be a complete fake or is it for real?

[This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited September 29, 2004).]

posted September 29, 2004 21:05            

Crystalix Group International is listed there with the symbol CYXG.Last was .20 pps.
Deal with CMKXTREME provides a way for CMKX to secure 51% control of CYXG with the loan.
SEE PS BELOW...this stmt is not correct.

Following info from Crystalix's latest 10QSB, 23 Sep 04 (edited):

SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2004 COMPARED TO JUNE 30, 2003.

Our revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2004 decreased by $1,315,734 or 37.0% from $3,554,459 for the six months ended June 30, 2003 to $2,238,725 for the six months ended June 30, 2004. The decrease is principally due the disposition of our retail stores in Las Vegas, Nevada in April 2003, a reduction in the glass products we sell our licensees and a reduction in our lease revenue due to licensees canceling their contracts in late 2003 and early 2004.

Research and development for the six months ended June 30, 2004 decreased by $51,018 or 100.0% from $51,018 for the six months ended June 30, 2003 to $0 for the six months ended June 30, 2004. The decrease is principally due to a decrease in product development due to lack of funds to finance such activities.

Payroll and related benefits for the six months ended June 30, 2004 decreased by $343,659 or 27.2% from $1,265,091 for the six months ended June 30, 2003 to $921,432 for the six months ended June 30, 2004. The decrease is a result of a reduction in personnel due to corporate downsizing in light of the reduction on revenue and a reduction in personnel in our retail sales staff as a result of the sale of our retail stores in Las Vegas in April 2003.

At June 30, 2004, we had a working capital deficit of $7,893,306, as compared to $6,311,497 at December 31, 2003. We had cash and cash equivalents of $44,654 at June 30, 2004 as compared to cash and cash equivalents of $58,881 at December 31, 2003. Our current cash on hand plus cash expected to be generated from operations will not be sufficient to sustain our current operations for the next twelve months. We will need to issue debt or equity securities in order to sustain operations until such time that we can generate positive cash flow from our operations.

During the six months ended June 30, 2004, our financing activities provided cash of $1,569,272, while our operating and investing activities used cash of $1,527,440 and $56,059, respectively. The cash used in operating activities was principally a result of the net loss we incurred. Our negative cash flow from operations was principally funded by borrowing additional amounts under a revolving line of credit from a related party.

During the six months ended June 30, 2004, we obtained $1,576,402 from advances from a related party under a revolving line of credit.

We recently restructured all of our related party debt as follows:

o On July 21, 2004, we issued a convertible promissory note to Mr. John Woodward in the amount of $1,824,000, which represents principal due on a previously issued note payable in the amount of $1,343,722 plus accrued interest in the amount of $480,279. This note bears interest at 10% per annum and calls for monthly interest payments from August 1, 2004 to December 1, 2004. Beginning on January 1, 2005, this note requires monthly principal payments of $50,405 plus accrued interest with any unpaid principal and interest due on July 1, 2007. The monthly principal and interest payments can be paid with shares of our common stock at the option of the holder. The conversion price is the lesser of the average closing price of our common stock five business days immediately prior to the conversion notice or $0.08. We have agreed to register the shares issuable upon conversion of this note. We have determined that there is a beneficial feature associated with this convertible promissory note in the amount of $615,600. This amount will be amortized as financing costs over the term of the note.

o On July 21, 2004, we issued a convertible promissory note to Mr. Kevin Ryan in the amount of $5,396,764, which represents (a) principal due on two previously issued notes payable in the amounts of $852,680 and $1,010,000, (b) principal due under a revolving credit agreement in the amount of $1,766,500, (c) principal due under an additional note payable in the amount of $1,500,000 and (d) accrued interest on the above mention obligations in the amount of $267,584. This note bears interest at 10% per annum and calls for monthly principal payments from August 1, 2004 to December 1, 2004 of $45,000. On the last day of the month beginning on August 31, 2004 through November 30, 2004, the accrued interest will be added to the principal amount. Beginning on January 1, 2005, this note requires monthly principal payments of $174,584 with any unpaid principal and interest due on July 1, 2007. The monthly principal and interest payments can be paid with shares of our common stock at the option of the holder. The conversion price is the lesser of the average closing price of our common stock five business days immediately prior to the conversion notice or $0.08. In addition, we granted to Mr. Ryan a warrant to purchase 1,875,000 shares of our common stock. The exercise price is lesser of the average closing price of our common stock five business days immediately prior to the notice of exercise or $0.08. We have agreed to register the shares issuable upon conversion of this note and exercise of the warrant. In accordance with EITF 00-27, we first determined the value of the note and the fair value of the detachable warrants issued in connection with this note. The estimated value of the warrants of $200,625 was determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model and the following assumptions: term of 7 years, a risk free interest rate of 3.5%, a dividend yield of 0% and volatility of 371%. The face amount of the note payable of $5,396,764 was proportionately allocated to the note and the warrants in the amounts of $5,203,330 and $193,434, respectively. The value of the note was then allocated between the note and the preferential conversion feature, which amounted to $3,188,488 and $2,014,842, respectively. The combined total discount is $2,208,276, and is being amortized over the term of the note.

o On July 21, 2004, we issued a promissory note to Ryan Capital Management, Inc. (this company is controlled by Kevin Ryan) in the amount of $452,137, which represents principal due on a previously issued note payable in the amount of $400,000 plus accrued interest in the amount of $52,137. This note bears interest at 10% per annum and calls for monthly interest payments from August 1, 2004 to December 1, 2004. Beginning on January 1, 2005, this note requires monthly

principal payments of $37,902 plus accrued interest with any unpaid principal and interest due on December 1, 2005.

o On August 1, 2004, we issued a promissory note to McCary & Rood (this company is controlled by Kevin Ryan) in the amount of $280,000, which represents past due consulting fees under a consulting agreement dated May 28, 2003. This note calls for monthly payments beginning August 1, 2004 of $30,000 with any unpaid principal due on May 1, 2005.

o On August 1, 2004, we issued a promissory note to McCary & Rood in the amount of $214,037, which represents past due reimbursable expenses under a consulting agreement dated May 28, 2003. This note calls for monthly payments beginning August 1, 2004 of $30,000 with any unpaid principal due on March 1, 2005.

In addition, on July 21, 2004, we issued 3,019,000 shares of our common stock to Kevin Ryan as additional consideration for the financing provided to us. Also, certain holders of our Series A preferred stock reallocated 2,647,900 of their shares to certain investors and senior members of our management team. We will take a charge to financing costs and compensation expense of $2,747,011 and $409,275, respectively, related to the issuance and reallocation of these common and preferred shares.
-----------------------------------
There was also a reference in the 10QSB to NASCAR. Am guessing they might etch some glassware for sale in connection with NASCAR events.
-----------------------------------------
Please do not get too excited though. Read the parts above with reference to earnings, etc. However, if CMKX can get control and if CYGX is selling around .20, then a reverse merger will get CMKX on the OTCBB...providing they get control. Have no idea, if it works that way, what it might do to CMKX. It couldn't hurt as far as I can see.

HOW'S THAT FOR A BASHER????

PS: SORRY!!! CORRECTION. I misread the part about 51% control possibilities. Control is not applicable with the loan from CMKX. It referred to issuance of more shares of CYXG as it applied to the loan.

On further review, CYXG has 34+ mil shs I/0. No way CMKX can get control that I can see. Only connection seems to be the NASCAR thing and UC's hobby. I now think I may be 100% wrong about the positive possibilities.

[This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited September 29, 2004).]

posted September 29, 2004 21:40            

Sorry, but I think I got carried away trying to find something positive to say about CMKX. I did not read the part about 51% issuance carefully enough.

Now, my thoughts are right back to square one minus a $2 mil loan. I don't know why UC or CMKX might have given said loan except that Crystalix is involved with NASCAR.
Of course, if CMKXTREME.COM has nothing to do with CMKX proper, I can see why UC would want the deal. If they default, he gets 2.5 mil shs for .08 that are currently at .20 pps.

posted September 29, 2004 23:15            

I think you have misunderstood that thread.

I am familiar with that $99 site, and, to the best of my knowledge, it is NOT A SCAM.
It provides a particular service more advanced than most posters here use. I do not use it because of the $99 cost. Guess I am cheap.

However, Dardadog does use it. He is one of the VERY BEST you will find posting on any of these Allstocks threads. Just like the rest of us, he is not always 100% right, but he wins in the longer run. You must remember that people like him are in and out very fast.

You will find a lot of those FREE sites Dardadog uses to be extremely useful for your own purposes. Add them to your favorites and try them out from time to time.

I have seen posts by other posters there as well and they do not seem to be promoting any scams whatsoever.

Maybe it was there, but I saw no reference to CMKX.

posted September 29, 2004 23:28            

quote:

---

Originally posted by sdrobert:
Wait a minute hold the presses. That allstock warning said that if a company does not report to the sec stay away I thought all pink sheet stocks dont have reports with the sec. It also says that if a company says they are planning to be fully reporting to stay away. SO QUESTION HAS A COMPANY THAT TURNED FROM NON REPORTING TO FULL REPORTING STATUS EVER NOT STATED THEY WERE GOING TO BEFORE HAND??
LETS SAY FOR EXAMPLE RIGHT NOW MICROSOFT IS NON REPORTING AND THEY RELEASE A PRESS RELEASE THAT THEY ARE GOING TO BE FULLY REPORTING BY THE END OF THE YEAR. RIGHT NOW THEY ARE A PINK SHEET STOCK. I am supposed to stay away. end of the year comes they are fully reporting as stated in their press release. oops
question on press releases
As far as I know any press releases aside from future goals and forward looking things info that is stated as a fact would have to be true. like in a press release i state I have 5 corvettes. If I actually only had 2 and it was verified to be as such I could be liable big time. So how does a company with thousands of shareholders be able to get away with a lie in a pr. I would think at least a couple would research and find out if it was false post it everywhere and report the offences to the proper authorities sec. Also Why would a lawyer that represents Legit companies waste his time with one that was a scam. If I was a lawyer and most of my clients were upstanding I would not want to tarnish my image representing a company that was a scam and it would take something of importance and crediblity for me to represent a company who has 800 billion shares worth .0003 Maybe you say Im doing for the money I think I rather be paid by a company that wont destroy all cred I have. Point is that if Roger Glenn is representing a company that is stealing from 10s of thousands of people out of their money that would be the stupidest thing anyone could possibly do. He would become so well known for being so unethical It is impossible to fathom. He would not only ruin his reputation but that of the entire lawfirm that he represents and if anyone who invests in stocks ever saw his name or the lawfirms name involved I think they would stay away. So point is I think this is not a scam it would be just too foolish to have a scam on this scale.

---

I really think it would be a great idea to research what type of lawsuits he has expertise in. If you look you'll see that he and his firm help unethical people that are in trouble. Who loses when they win is the stock holders. It's not imagine they are in business for, they are in it for the money.
Which of course thier reputation when they are able to help keep the company out of trouble!

posted September 30, 2004 00:40            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Wallace#1:
netsec,

The problem with CMKX is that there are few if any positive things about it to post. The few positive things existing have been redundantly posted time after time. On the other hand, they (CMKX) keep doing (and not doing) one stupid fact after another. Further, there are far more protagonists on this thread than so-called bashers or negative posters.

That, basically, is why I cannot say anything positive about CMKX. As a result of all those numerous opposing facts, I do feel they must be presented...and they have been many times. Not just by me, but also by others, including CMKX shareholders. Some seem to want them reposted time after time. They know what said opposing facts are and cannot provide any logical defense whatsoever. Further, I don't much care if anyone calls me a basher. If CMKX is not a scam, it certainly bears all the earmarks of one. For your and others' sakes, I hope it is not. I cannot fathom how all the opposing facts can so easily be ignored or spun.

I have owned CMKX and I have sold CMKX. To me, it is simply just another stock where I may or may not be able to make money. I never "fall in love" with any stock".

I think a lot of newbies here have been sucked into buying CMKX as a result of some of the major posters here and on other boards...and that, as far as I am concerned, is a disservice. Readers should at least be able to consider dissenting points of view. Although many holders of CMKX on this thread consider that negative, I do not. I take a strictly objective approach.

As far as I can determine with valid DD and logical observations of CMKX convolutions and activities, the only thing CMKX has going for it is a remote possibility of finding diamonds...and they seem to be doing little or nothing to advance that objective.
In reality, they seem to be doing everything other than finding diamonds. You know those facts as well.

As far as whatever time I spend on this thread is concerned, if you count the number of my posts vs those of others, you will find that others post much, much more than I do. No offense to him, but noahltl is a very good example...and I do not blame him for posting his views. How in hell do you think there will be a forum with exchanges of facts, ideas, theories and opinions if there are no dissenting (positive or negative) points of view?

Another reason I post here is because I find the thought processes both fascinating and interesting...and in many cases comical (with the exception of one or more posters). In many ways, this is truly the blind leading the blind...and, in real life, even the blind do a better job of it. No offense to anyone, but it is quite obvious that the majority of posters here, and who are also CMKX shareholders, have little experience.

Enough for now. Got to get back to bashing. LOL

---

Wow, Wallace, you're my hero, could not have said that better.... my feelings, as well.
Thanks for putting it on paper(sic).
Hey, check arrive yet? Kidding.

posted September 30, 2004 00:59            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Ruh420:
If I was the ceo of a scam company, i'd do it like lsta, prim, etc, etc etc...nice and quiet like.

I wouldn't be a public figure who has personally met probably hundreds of shareholders, signed on however many scam companys.

I wouldn't own a VERY public racing team, let alone 3??.

I wouldn't feel safe scamming 40,000+ people, knowing there have already been death threats towards employees(IMO re: Melvin on paltalk).

I wouldn't involve my extended family.. unless we were a crime family of course.

I wouldn't be joining one of these other scam companies in a Las Vegas party with 4-6000+ already RSVP'd.

This, just like most things in life, is nothing more then point of view. There is mine. Have fun.

---

posted September 30, 2004 01:35            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Upside:
originally posted by Wallace#1:
I was probably the only one here who sent an e-mail to BOB FREY stating that in my opinion you had done nothing to warrant being banned. While I don't agree with your methods, this is a forum where free speech (within certain guidlines) should prevail. Good day sir.

---

It's so ironic- Bob Frey is also THE announcer of the NHRA. The voice of NHRA. Freaky. I kept seeing this name... Funny how paths cross...

posted September 30, 2004 08:30            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Wallace#1:
sdrobert,

Sorry, but I think I got carried away trying to find something positive to say about CMKX. I did not read the part about 51% issuance carefully enough.

Now, my thoughts are right back to square one minus a $2 mil loan. I don't know why UC or CMKX might have given said loan except that Crystalix is involved with NASCAR.
Of course, if CMKXTREME.COM has nothing to do with CMKX proper, I can see why UC would want the deal. If they default, he gets 2.5 mil shs for .08 that are currently at .20 pps.

[This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited September 29, 2004).]

---

Wallace...I'm ashamed of you. lol See, this is why I told someone recently that I thought you were not a bad guy. But you are destroying the image I have of you.... Just kidding. Good work!!

posted September 30, 2004 08:38            

quote:

---

Originally posted by tradingpennys:
If you look you'll see that he and his firm help unethical people that are in trouble.

---

Trading... Please give examples. What unethical people? How do you know they are unethical? Is that an opinion? Post the URL please. If what you say is true we need to see it for ourselves. Thanks.

posted September 30, 2004 08:57            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Bob Frey:
"Bob Frey is also THE announcer of the NHRA."

Not the same.

---

posted September 30, 2004 09:03            

quote:

---

Originally posted by sdrobert:
It seems to me I have run across what in my oppinion who are very possible paid pumpers, rich by 06, dardadog, and robob if you check all of there post there is not one skeptical remark with any stock all pumps. they messed up big time though with the "Jump On the bandwagon thread" if you go to my third to last post in there it makes alot of sence. watch out for these guys. I hope they are not the admins of allstocks or I might be gone.

[This message has been edited by Allstocks (edited September 30, 2004).]

---

posted September 30, 2004 09:24            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Allstocks:
Most all are welcome at AllStocks.com.

All are welcome to come and go as they please.

Over 10,000 folks visited yesterday.

Do as you please.

---

And that's exactly what we'll do. Wallace is the main reason that I no longer post on this thread. I barely lurk on this thread anymore. At first, I just tried to ignore the wallace fights with everyone. I thought I'd just skip them and read the usefull stuff. THERE IS NO USEFULL INFOMATION PROVIDED HERE, IT'S JUST NONSTOP WALLACE ATTACKS ON OTHER POSTERS!

If you continue to allow this, you'll lose many people. If you're not worried about the loss of traffic, then you're doing better than I thought.

This thread should just be renamed "wallace". I'm out of here.

posted September 30, 2004 11:42            

What I dont get is your attitde towards this stock. Why this one? Most folks pump the stocks they own. Nature of the game. I will agree ...if this is a scam then we should save the newbies. But as allstocks says 90% are probably scams in pennyland. I learned the hard way. When you make money, get out...

Why didnt you get on the reality and others with all the pumping on qbid?

posted September 30, 2004 12:03            

P.S: Glassman and Wallace may have buy orders at 0001 (and may be 0002)

GLTA