posted September 07, 2004 14:09            

quote:

---

Originally posted by dwman:
Numerous 9000000 blocks trading this morning.

---

posted September 07, 2004 14:28            

quote:

---

Originally posted by noahltl:
Latest RUMORS from the track.
... Elcamino said largest mineral in world still not identified They asked about 3-4 minerals not the right one
...
FWIW until a PR

---

I believe the "still not identified" does not mean it is one of the few remaining slots on the periodic chart. I believe it refers to attempts to get them to tell us what it is.

I think it is uranium. Here's why.

http://www.cna.ca/english/Media_Room/releases/Aug%203-Media%20release.pdf

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE DECLINING CONFIDENCE IN THE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY; ONE YEAR AFTER BLACKOUT MAJORITIES SUPPORT INVESTMENT IN NUCLEAR OTTAWA (August 3, 2004) -- After a massive power outage darkened much of Ontario and the eastern United States nearly a year ago, new opinion research finds that public confidence in our energy supplies has declined significantly. According to an Ipsos-Reid survey released today, only 43 per cent of Ontarians now believe that the electricity supply is sufficient to meet present and future needs. Nationally, confidence in the security of our energy supplies has declined to 59 per cent from 71 per cent two years ago. In response to concerns about looming electricity shortfalls, 67 per cent of Ontarians and 57 per cent of Canadians nationwide say they support upgrading and modernizing nuclear facilities. And in Ontario, 50 per cent of the public favours building new nuclear facilities. “Nuclear contributes about 45 per cent of Ontario’s electricity supply and about 16 per cent of Canada’s electricity supply. Nuclear is a major workhorse of the system. It provides much of the power we need to maintain our economy and standard of living -- at one of the lowest costs, and without emitting greenhouse gasses,” said Murray Elston, President and CEO of the Canadian Nuclear Association. “Clearly, people in Ontario and across the country recognize the important role of nuclear power, and they support investing in nuclear to ensure the security and stability of our energy supplies.”
The Ipsos-Reid survey, carried out for the Canadian Nuclear Association, was conducted between May 13 and May 21 and again between June 1 and 3, 2004. In May, a representative randomly selected sample of 2,207 adult Canadians (obtaining a ±2.1 per cent margin of error) and 800 Ontarians (obtaining a ±3.5 per cent margin of error) was interviewed by telephone. In June, a representative randomly selected sample of 1,000 adult Canadians (obtaining a ±3.1 per cent margin of error) and 379 Ontarians (obtaining a ±5 per cent margin of error) was interviewed by telephone. These margins of error will be larger within regions and for other sub-groupings of the survey population. These data were weighted to ensure the sample's regional and age/sex composition reflects that of the actual Canadian population according to the 2001 Census data. For more information on this research, including a full report of results, and tabular data, please go online to http://www.ipsos.ca. For more information, please contact : Darrell Bricker, President, Ipsos-Reid Public Affairs (416) 324-2900 Darrell.bricker@ipsos-na.com www.ipsos-pa.com Claudia Lemieux Canadian Nuclear Association Director of Communications and Media Relations (613) 237-9082 lemieuxc@cna.ca www.cna.ca Mike Pettapiece PR POST 416-777-0368

JMO
Don

posted September 07, 2004 15:00            

quote:

---

Originally posted by noahltl:
SGGM .14 / .15

Forgive me for thinking out loud, but SGGM's AS is 900 billion. CMKX AS at 800 billion. Wouldn't a one for one share merger into SGGM make a lot of sense. If we did that, our CMKX shares would be worth .14 today. Well I can dream can't I?

---

posted September 07, 2004 15:08            

Thank you for your inquiry regarding the pending CMKX spin-offs. There are currently three spin offs taking place. The ex-date for the first transaction is 8/20/04. This is the date on which the seller, and not the buyer, of a stock will be entitled to a recently announced dividend/spin-off. It is indicated in newspaper listings with an "x". The shares from the spin-off are due to payout on 9/24/04. The terms of the spin off are 1 share for each 103950 shares held of CMKX. If you are due to receive the shares, you should see them appear in the first week of October.
The second spin off's ex-date is 8/31/04, with a pay date of 10/1/04. The terms of the spin off are .0256 shares for each 1 share held of CMKX. The third spin off's ex-date is 9/17/04, with a pay date of 10/3/04. The terms of the spin off is 1 share for each 1 share held of CMKX.

quote:

---

Originally posted by bill1352:
i emailed ameritrade this morning about the dividend splits & got a reply...notice the UCAD has the old split but the CIM has the new split

Dear William xxxxxx:

Thank you for contacting us today concerning CMKX.

At this time, we have not received any official information pertaining to
dividend payments for CMKX. We have received preliminary information pertaining
to CIM and UCAD restricted.

According to the preliminary information we received, the ex-dividend date for
the UCAD dividend was 08/18/2004 and payable on 09/24/2004 at a rate of
.0000155. Based on the preliminary information received concerning CIM, I am
showing an ex-dividend date of 08/31/2004 with a payable date of 10/01/2004 at a
rate of .0256.

We have not received any information pertaining to GEMM at this time. Should a
dividend payment be made, shareholders accounts would be updated accordingly
upon receipt of such payment.

If you have further concerns or inquiries, please reply to this message.

Sincerely,

xxxxxx xxxx
Reorganization and Safekeeping, Ameritrade
Division of Ameritrade, Inc.

---

posted September 07, 2004 15:15            

NEVADA SECRETARY OF STATE

Company Name: ST. GEORGE METALS, INC. INDEX NUMBER 0000848626

Type: REGULAR (DOMESTIC)

Status: ACTIVE (REINSTATED)

Standing: CURRENTLY IN GOOD STANDING

Status Date: 7/19/2004

Filing Date: 6/13/1984

Duration: PERPETUAL

State or Country of Incorporation: NEVADA

Purpose: ALL LEGAL ACTIVITIES; HAS NO GAMING

Registered Agent: MARK GIEBELHAUS
Status: ACCEPTED
Creation Date: 8/6/2004
Companies Represented: 1
Companies in Good Standing: 1

Registered Office: 1350 E FLAMINGO RD #688
LAS VEGAS, NV 89119

Additional Information: HAS LIMITED LIABILITY

Filing Number: C4070-1984

Annual Report: Date Due: 2005
Report Date: 8/6/2004
Comments: TERMINATED LIST OF OFFICERS; Number of Officers Reported: 3

Stock Information: Par Value: $ 0.001
Total Capital: $ 950,000,000,000

Officers, Directors: MARK GIEBELHAUS
PRESIDENT
1350 E. FLAMINGO RD #688
LAS VEGAS, NV 89119
Added Date: 4/15/1985

R. ROSS BLUSSON
DIRECTOR
470 W. 37TH STREET
VANCOUVER, BC
Added Date: 7/9/1984

History: File Date: 8/6/2004
Comments: DONALD HAINES #688 1350 E. FLAMINGO RD LAS VEGAS NV 89119 SBA
Transaction: RESIDENT AGENT RESOLUTION

File Date: 7/23/2004
Comments: CERTIFICATE OF AMENDMENT FILED AMENDING CORPORATE STOCK. NEW ACTUAL STOCK IS 950,000,000,000 @ .001 = 950,000,000. ($34725) 1PG SBA
Transaction: 020

File Date: 7/23/2004
Comments: CAPITAL STOCK WAS 40,000,000 @ .010= 400,000 SBA
Transaction: CHANGE CAPITAL

File Date: 7/19/2004
Comments: REINSTATED, REVOKED 07-01-04 AJW
Transaction: OTHER AMENDMENT

File Date: 7/19/2004
Comments: THOMAS L. BELAUSTEGUI 71 WASHINGTON ST RENO NV 89503 AJW
Transaction: RESIDENT AGENT RESOLUTION

File Date: 7/30/1993
Comments: CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION, PREFERENCES, RIGHTS AND LIMITATIONS OF SERIES B PREFERRED STOCK, $.01 PAR VALUE. DMF
Transaction: OTHER AMENDMENT

File Date: 8/22/1991
Comments: CERTIFICATE OF DESIGNATION, PREFERENCES, RIGHTS AND LIMITATIONS OF SERIES A PREFERRED STOCK, $.01 PAR VALUE. TLS
Transaction: OTHER AMENDMENT

File Date: 12/31/1990
Comments: RESTATED ARTICLES - VARIOUS CHANGES IN THE ARTICLES C W
Transaction: OTHER AMENDMENT

File Date: 12/31/1990
Comments: CAPITAL STOCK WAS 2500 NO PAR C W
Transaction: CHANGE CAPITAL

File Date: 2/14/1989
Comments: ADDING LIABILITY-ARTICLES XII AND XIII
Transaction: CHANGED LIMITED LIABILITY

File Date: 7/6/1987
Comments: E. A. HOLLINGSWORTH, ESQ. 226 CALIFORNIA AVE RENO NV 89509
Transaction: RESIDENT AGENT RESOLUTION

File Date: 11/22/1985
Comments: E. A. HOLLINGSWORTH, ESQ. 327 SOUTH ARLINGTON RENO NV 89501
Transaction: RESIDENT AGENT REMOVAL

File Date: 6/5/1985
Comments: E. A. HOLLINGSWORTH, ESQ. 604 LANDER STREET RENO NV 89509
Transaction: RESIDENT AGENT REMOVAL

posted September 07, 2004 15:46            

Was .018 around 3:30, then just jumped directly to .28 and is now .35

posted September 07, 2004 15:53            

quote:

---

Originally posted by noahltl:

Stock Information: Par Value: $ 0.001
Total Capital: $ 950,000,000,000

---

posted September 07, 2004 16:00            

sarki316
Member posted August 25, 2004 11:48            
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pencil down Sept 7th on your calander. That is when CMKX will make there huge announcment. REGARDING EVERYTHING. AND IT WILL BE VERY VERY GOOD.

(Come on, sarki... you have 8 more hours to be right!)

posted September 07, 2004 16:08            

The next time play the CO. that CMKX get into an agreement with.

See UCAD, GEMM, SGGM they all went up, yet we stayed the same.

Still holding

posted September 07, 2004 16:11            

quote:

---

Originally posted by dwman:
The comment was made by someone that 3 or 4 questions were asked about the mystery metal and none of the guesses were right. Surely uranium should have been one they asked about and got a "no" answer. Does anyone know if uranium was one that was mentioned. I still think it was uranium.

---

But if the "ium" was still such a secret, what do you think would have been the answer even if the guy got it RIGHT?

I can't imagine a company deciding to keep something confidential... UNLESS some GUESSES it !

posted September 07, 2004 16:16            

quote:

---

Originally posted by bill1352:
kevy0899
Member posted September 07, 2004 15:08

---

Bill, wasn't the third dividend CIM?

posted September 07, 2004 16:18            

By: tonicma
07 Sep 2004, 04:04 PM EDT
Msg. 78287 of 78289
Jump to msg. #
CMKX not going up due to MM applying "reverse psychology" on us. Have you read oh it. Bascially the idea is to make the person think another way by "allowing" them to do what they intended to do in the first place due to their desire to defy the another person. So how does the MM apply this. Very simple.
1) MM want you to sell CMKX
2) shareholders go "NO MM I am buying more and holding no matter what happens"
3) MM go ok, well since we can't "make" them to sell than we will let them just hold and buy.
4) MM go "ok fine buy it and hold it"
5) We hold and is happy
6) MM make other company "close" to us to ballistic
7) shareholder go "what the f**k"
8) shareholder get pissed off at "THEIR INVESTMENT", note they are not pissed off at the MM but their investment.
ie. "why is everybody going up and we are not damn it?"
" I wish I bought GEMM, SGGM, UCAD instead of CMKX"
9) Shareholder began to "question" their CMKX holding.
10) shareholder go "well maybe I'll sell some of mine say > 50% gains and buy ucad and sggm
11) MM get your shares
12) we buy sggm, gemm, ucad
13) MM bring these baby down hard (as we have seen from gemm and ucad)
14) shareholder panic, gets pissed off sells ucad gemm sggm.
After this the shareholder does NOT buy anymore CMKX immediately because of their previous action of selling CMKX and due to the fact that they still have "some" cmkx BUT the gains they made from CMKX is lost due to the declining of ucad gemm sggm they bought
MM at the end benefits BIG time why
1) due to shareholder selling of cmkx, they cover and keep price down
2) They make profit from "shorting" UCAD SGGM GEMM by selling high than buying back low.
So people, don't worry about the sggm going up etc. it will come down hard real hard due to people buying it. just watch and see. We saw it happen to ucad AND GEMM.
Just hold your cmkx shares.

posted September 07, 2004 16:22            

quote:

---

Originally posted by bill1352:
kevy0899
Member posted September 07, 2004 15:08

---

posted September 07, 2004 16:28            

quote:

---

Originally posted by kevy0899:
I have to admit... I was shocked too. But I am also new to this and didnt really know what to think. Thanks for the response.

[QUOTE]Originally posted by bill1352:
[b]kevy0899
Member posted September 07, 2004 15:08

---

posted September 07, 2004 16:53            

quote:

---

Originally posted by bill1352:
noah...no cim was the 7/19/04 and gem was 8/02/04

---

Thanks Bill, I've got 'em written down now. So confusing.

posted September 07, 2004 17:16            

Shares Outstanding
684,448,000*

*Numbers include tradable shares only

Today's Volume
-491,261,259
http://tools.thestreet.com/rmy/quotes.html?osymb=tfct&pg=qcn&timer=&symb=cmkx&go_btn.x=14&go_btn.y=9

posted September 07, 2004 19:25            

Posted by: zeninvestor32
In reply to: None Date:9/7/2004 4:19:42 PM
Post #of 11641

COMPOUNDED MATH

Assumptions:

1. 800B share naked short.
2. 200B share OS on SGGM.
3. 40B share float in CMKX (float which does not include up to 760B restricted)
4. Urban distributes unrestricted SGGM 5:1 to only unrestricted CMKX (choosing to forego insider profit)

5:1 ratio on 800B naked short shares equals a 4 Trillion share short position hitting the books on SGGM for those short. Multiply that by .35 = $1.35T share short position. LOL

Do I believe the above will happen? No. Do I think it's possible? Sure, anything's possible at this stage. LOL I challenge someone to give me an argument as to why the above could NOT happen outside of my variables being off. Fun food for thought and proof positive that we know NOTHING since there are so many variables at the company's disposal. This has got to be the finest mystery ever crafted in the history of the financial markets. I can't wait for the resolution. Hopefully it will be a Sixth Sense-like spinaround that leaves you breathless. Excuse me, I have to go back to the counter for my free popcorn bucket refills.

Z

As always, these are my personal opinions.

Hopefully nobody in here is investing anything but "fun" money that they can afford to gamble with.

posted September 07, 2004 19:29            

SGGM Manipulation?

I was wondering if anyone thinks that it is possible that SGGM is turning the tables on the MM's.

This is the O/S as of 2002:

SGGM -- St. George Metals, Inc.
Com (1 Cent) http://www.pinksheets.com/quote/company_profile.jsp?symbol=SGGM

Shares Outstanding: 14,487,159 as of 2002-10-31

It would take about $144,871 to buy up all of the outstanding shares of SGGM at the price of .01 cents per share.
(SGGM is already shelling out 10 million dollars to CMKX, so 144 thousand wouldn't be hard for them to come up with.)

If the law of supply and demand holds true, they could conceivably bring the pps up to any price they want. (SGGM could even be buying up all of the available shares themselves, to do this.)

Now for specolation:
When they bring the pps up to the price that SGGM is happy with, let's say .50 cents per share,

What would happen if CMKX lets loose a pr stating that the entire 200 billion SGGM shares controlled by CMKX would be offered as a dividend to its shareholders, in restricted form, on a 1 for 1 basis.

What would happen to the pps of CMKX?

Just pure specolation.
What does anyone think of this?

xedd

posted September 07, 2004 21:08            

quote:

---

Originally posted by VNGNTN1:
NOAH
This is old data .
- - - - - - -
SGGM -- St. George Metals, Inc.
Com (1 Cent) http://www.pinksheets.com/quote/company_profile.jsp?symbol=SGGM

Shares Outstanding: 14,487,159 as of 2002-10-31
- - - - - - - -
I have seen several references to 950b.
VAN

---

Pink sheets shows them still in VA. Van. The Secy of State post above is from July 19, 2004.

You must be talking about the repost. Yes that link is old.

posted September 08, 2004 05:41            

quote:

---

Originally posted by bill1352:
i'm still guessing no news till after the gemm shares are paid except maybe a pr stating they took the option on the rest of the gemm shares. i'm wondering and i have looked but no legal answer found yet...can cmkx change the shares given on CIM without a pr stating so. i don't think a pr is legally binding. as there is no otc bb post on gemm as yet and if things follow suit it will work out to a third o/s. and since the pay date is 3 weeks give or take an explaination of the differance might be nice. since cmkx doesn't seem to have any plans of telling us it might help if we knew if they can change the amount without telling anyone. 20 billion shares fits all the info we do know for sure. the a/s of 800 billion and a few shares differance for 11 trading days. that is if each shares owned has been counted for each x-date. any facts found either way would be welcome.

---

posted September 08, 2004 08:05            

U.S. Canadian Minerals Inc. Receives $3,000,000 of Funding
September 08, 2004 05:30:00 AM ET

U.S. Canadian Minerals Inc. UCAD announced today that it has received $3,000,000 of funding via a private placement.

Rendal Williams, CEO of UCAD, stated, "This funding will allow the company to move forward on several fronts in the execution of its current plans and future development of the company's financial growth as dictated by the board of directors."

A U.S. Canadian Minerals Inc. executive team, with other strategic partners, will arrive in South America this week to explore the development of several key acquisition possibilities that have been targeted on previous trips. Williams further stated, "Many of the due diligence packages are nearing completion, revealing incredible potential results, which demands an additional research trip to conclude the feasibility of Level 1 priority for expanded operations inside South America."