posted September 25, 2004 02:34            

quote:

---

Originally posted by will:
It's not difficult to believe at all. You could expand it further and make it just as juicy as the Sterlings, Dr D's do with the positive spin. (Notice I took Zen off the list). Now what if, a guy had a company, issued a trillion shares, used the cash from the shares sold for his own personal gain. Had control of another company, through sweetheart deals to the other company he controlled, he sihpons off the assets, (valuable claims), to that company leaving the original trillion share company worthless. One day he says, well folks, we tried hard, it didn't work, BK, padlocks. game, set, match, check, checkmate, FINISHED, thank you for your support.

---

posted September 25, 2004 09:14            

4,000,000 long and strong
will soon be singing a joyful song.

posted September 25, 2004 10:16            

September 25, 2004

Company: CMKM Diamonds, Inc. Common Stock Symbol: CMKX Amount: +stk Record Date: 08/31/2004 Payment Date: 10/18/2004

This information can be viewed at http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/dailylist/history/2004/Dividends/di09242004.stm

Tel: (203) 375-9609 NASDAQ Market Data Integrity

posted September 25, 2004 10:16            

September 25, 2004

Company: CMKM Diamonds, Inc. Common Stock Symbol: CMKX Amount: +stk Record Date: 08/31/2004 Payment Date: 10/18/2004

This information can be viewed at http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/dailylist/history/2004/Dividends/di09242004.stm]http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/dailylist/history/2004/Dividends/di09242004.stm

Tel: (203) 375-9609 NASDAQ Market Data Integrity

[This message has been edited by will (edited September 25, 2004).]

posted September 25, 2004 10:56            

quote:

---

Originally posted by will:
CMKX Pays +stk Per Share Record Date 08/31/2004
via CDS

September 25, 2004

Company: CMKM Diamonds, Inc. Common Stock Symbol: CMKX Amount: +stk Record Date: 08/31/2004 Payment Date: 10/18/2004

This information can be viewed at http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/dailylist/history/2004/Dividends/di09242004.stm]http://www.nasdaqtrader .com/dailylist/history/2004/Dividends/di09242004.stm]http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/dailylist/history/2004/Dividends/di09242004.stm

Tel: (203) 375-9609 NASDAQ Market Data Integrity

[This message has been edited by will (edited September 25, 2004).]

[This message has been edited by will (edited September 25, 2004).]

---

posted September 25, 2004 11:02            

[This message has been edited by will (edited September 25, 2004).]

posted September 25, 2004 11:21            

quote:

---

Originally posted by will:
Sorry, Justthis1nce, I can't get you a clean URL to the First Alert News, or the referenced URL. For some reason it's not letting me get to it. Was sent to me in an email from First Alert News, but isn't listed in First Alert News, under CMKX. Can't help ya, man. I have no idea what it means either

[This message has been edited by will (edited September 25, 2004).]

[This message has been edited by will (edited September 25, 2004).]

---

Appreciate your efforts Will, cheers. M

posted September 25, 2004 11:53            

Dwman as well

How are you boys doing? A lot of happenings in the past two weeks with our stock!!

This is GOOOOOOOOOOODDDDDDD!

Did I mention I missed you guys!

3.8 Million STRONG! GO CMKX!

posted September 25, 2004 11:55            

quote:

---

Originally posted by noahltl:

For the past several weeks, hundreds of people on the several different boards that I visit were reporting having received their UCAD dividends. Even a few here have reported such. How could that be when the TA announces they haven't even sent them out yet. The really amazing thing was that some people reported actually having sold their UCAD dividend shares. Now that can't be can it? Some might answer that a few brokerages were just jumping the gun on their accounting, and the sales were accidental. But to let shares be sold when they were restricted????? That is not going to happen that many times.

A couple of days ago, someone here asked how the MM's could short restricted shares. They can't. So the theory is that they substituted naked short shares of UCAD for the restricted ones. The brokerages put them in various investors accounts and they showed up when many went looking. They could be sold, because they were only naked shares, not restricted shares.

The MM's were shoving in naked shorts all day today in many people's accounts so that they would be diluted in the mix with all of the real dividend shares.

Buy guess what, no legit shares showed up today. Instead Roger announces that they will be put in our accounts on Oct 6. THE GOTCHA MOMENT Now it is easy to catch the naked shorters. They have placed all of these additionally shorted UCAD shares into accounts to cover, and now each placement can be traced directly to the Naked Shorter.

Coincidence that this occurs on the effective date of the SEC regs on naked shorting? Coincidence that CMKX will place the divies on the 12th day from now, the day before the 13th day for settlement?

I think this was a brilliant head fake by Roger to get the naked shorts to tip their own hands and show us what they got.

---

posted September 25, 2004 12:03            

Yes, it's me... lol... New and Improved, with better manners.

It is good to 'see' you too

posted September 25, 2004 12:50            

CMKX Pays +stk Per Share Record Date 08/31/2004
via CDS
September 25, 2004

Company: CMKM Diamonds, Inc. Common Stock Symbol: CMKX Amount: +stk Record Date: 08/31/2004 Payment Date: 10/18/2004

posted September 25, 2004 13:34            

[This message has been edited by VNGNTN1 (edited September 25, 2004).]

posted September 25, 2004 13:55            

CMKX Pays +stk Per Share Record Date 08/31/2004
via CDS
September 25, 2004

Company: CMKM Diamonds, Inc. Common Stock Symbol: CMKX Amount: +stk Record Date: 08/31/2004 Payment Date: 10/18/2004

quote:

---

Originally posted by VNGNTN1:
WILL
Had some trouble following your question, but guess you think the math indicates higher shares of O/S
This means that the company will need to explain the dilution.
VAN

[This message has been edited by VNGNTN1 (edited September 25, 2004).]

[This message has been edited by VNGNTN1 (edited September 25, 2004).]

---

posted September 25, 2004 14:26            

quote:

---

Originally posted by VNGNTN1:
WILL
Hate to be so simplistic, but I think it is a stall. Don't know why. There are lots of possibilities Pos/Neg. Plus the SEC rules change may complicate.
VAN

---

posted September 25, 2004 14:47            

i know you guys don't like what i say here much, but i have seen plenty of transparent co's with excellent fundamentals get thrashed...

short-selling is the EZst explanation, it may be wrong, but.....

posted September 25, 2004 15:12            

Tina,
Easily forgiven! No big deal. LMAO

JBCak,
????????? Allstocks must really be forgiving. Do you think you can be civil, polite and behave yourself now?

noahltl,
How in hell can you even suggest there are no outstanding shares of CMKX? Did I misunderstand your post?

posted September 25, 2004 15:40            

"Allstocks must really be forgiving. Do you think you can be civil, polite and behave yourself now?"

I can try... If that doesn't work, I had a teacher in second grade put duck tape over my friends mouth, while I got duct taped to a chair... (Catholic school for ya)... lol...

=============================================

CMKX has me racing against the clock... I need more shares! Hmmmmm... I can sell a liver, I can get by on one (Homer Simpson)...lol...

Anyone have any dividends magically show up in your accounts?

I have Choicetrade and they haven't posted anything to my account as of today... I was just curious, thats all

-John-

posted September 25, 2004 15:57            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Wallace#1:
Good afternoon, all.

Tina,
Easily forgiven! No big deal. LMAO

JBCak,
????????? Allstocks must really be forgiving. Do you think you can be civil, polite and behave yourself now?

noahltl,
How in hell can you even suggest there are no outstanding shares of CMKX? Did I misunderstand your post?

---

In hell, I won't suggest it. What I was saying is that it is as easy for me to say there is zero OS, as it is to say there is 800 billion or 1.2 trillion, because the OTC BB, that created those numbers, didn't even have the right date, so how can we assume anything else is fact.

posted September 25, 2004 16:06            

CMKX has REPEATEDLY said that shareholders and investors need to listen to OFFICIAL COMPANY Press Releases...

Any OTHER information (that INCLUDES otcbb DOT COM YES DOT COM.... AGAIN DOT COM, COMMERCIAL SITE... Are they biased? Who reaps the profits of this website?...) is not official information and should not be listened to. Again I trust CMKX and will listen to ONLY THEM... Not OTCBB. com

And what Noah is trying to say is that, in theory, since NO ONE EXCEPT CMKX Diamonds knows the true O/S count, it is possible for Roger Glenn to have backed financing to buyback a LARGE amount of the O/S... If there was a true NSS problem, buyback a large percentage of the shares would help to 'prove' Rogers case that infact a NSS problem is prevelant.

What Noah is trying to say, I think anyways, is that no one knows how many shares, and I for one DO NOT BELEIVE IT TO BE 800 BILLION O/S , MAYBE A/S but that doesn't mean squat...

The possibility of Noah being right is no more or LESS than Wallace being correct or wrong.

Since we DO NOT KNOW THE SHARE COUNT, ANY ONE OF US CAN BE RIGHT, OR WE ALL CAN BE WRONG...

Untilt here is proof of the share count, no one is less or more right... NO ONE HERE KNOWS ANYTHING ABOUT WHAT IS HAPPENING WITHIN THE COMPANY... And that is the way it should be

posted September 25, 2004 16:21            

quote:

---

Originally posted by will:
"Untilt here is proof of the share count, no one is less or more right... NO ONE HERE KNOWS ANYTHING ABOUT WHAT IS HAPPENING WITHIN THE COMPANY... And that is the way it should be"

That begs the question: Why should it be that way?
Wouldn't you feel much better knowing the share structure. The company has had months to publish it. An audit was completed before the T/A fiasco. Why do you feel comfortable not knowing, and don't say because you trust these people to have your best interest at heart, because let me tell you, they DON'T !

---

Will let me repost the answer to that from last night.

There is a difference in being uninformed and confused. I own some stock in Northfield Laboratories who is finishing up on testing of a blood substitute. I don't see their tests results yet. I don't know what their attorney is doing with the FDA. When they dumped a bunch of shares in the market, I didn't moan and groan, because I knew it would be ok. Turns out they bought a bunch of manufacturing equipment so they could be ready on approval. I didn't run around questioning them with other shareholders. I didn't scream for a PR. I just waited to see why they did it. And when they sold a bunch more shares, the PPS dropped 8.00. But I didn't sell. And I won't because I trust the company, after doing my DD. And I have owned that stock longer than CMKX.

posted September 25, 2004 17:03            

First, ask yourself what have they done to earn your trust?
Second, ask youself what have they done to destroy your trust?

There is no question that the list to the 2nd question is much, much longer by far than that of the first.

Ask yourself simplier questions. What have they accomplished? Diamonds? Earnings? Informed Shareholders? SEC Filing? Objective Valuations of Claims? Issued/Outstanding? Full Disclosure? Non-Arm's Length Transactions? Shareholder Voting? Conflicts of Interest? Ambiguity?
Convoluted Deals? 800 Billion Authorized?
Reverse Splits? Worthless Dividends? Nepotism?

Lots more! How about Funny Car, Truck & Motorcycle, Visa Card, Past Track Records and Litigation?

[This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited September 25, 2004).]

posted September 25, 2004 17:10            

quote:

---

Originally posted by will:
So, it comes down to trust? Looks like your Northern Labs is a bit more stable, and better managed than CMKX. You may have reason to hang in there with them, but CMKX has shown that they haven't earned that type of blind faith.

---

They haven't earned mistrust either. Regardless of Wallace's rantings.

posted September 25, 2004 17:30            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Wallace#1:
noahltl wrote:
They haven't earned mistrust either.

---

Some mistrust comes from a lack of understanding

posted September 25, 2004 17:50            

Wally wrote...

Ask yourself simplier questions. What have they accomplished? Diamonds? Earnings? Informed Shareholders? SEC Filing? Objective Valuations of Claims? Issued/Outstanding?
Full Disclosure? Non-Arm's Length Transactions? Shareholder Voting? Conflicts of Interest? Ambiguity?
Convoluted Deals? 800 Billion Authorized?
Reverse Splits? Worthless Dividends? Nepotism?
------------------------------------
Deuces and one-eyed-jacks are wild.
Could all be one he$$ of a poker face U. C. has.
Could be a bluff, could be a royal flush.But I'm all in, and I call.

posted September 25, 2004 18:26            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Wallace#1:
noahltl wrote:
They haven't earned mistrust either.

---

Wallace1...

posted September 25, 2004 19:43            

quote:

---

Originally posted by WorkAHolic:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Wallace#1:
[b]noahltl wrote:
They haven't earned mistrust either.

---

posted September 25, 2004 19:51            

quote:

---

Question: Do you trust Melvin?

---

Implicitly! Melvins word is gospel, at least when he's not drunk. LOL!

posted September 25, 2004 19:57            

Since press releases by companies are not subject to verification of accuracy or truthfulness by the services that distribute them, the investing public has no idea that any of them are anything but reliable and truthful information and only subject to the usual safe harbor provisions which say, "all this might never happen as stated". Sadly it doesn't say, "every word here could just as easily be a big fat lie intended only for the purpose of ripping off the investing public and enriching the promoters and insiders".

It is true that, companies that manipulate their stocks through false or misleading press releases can be, and often are, held accountable by the SEC but, unfortunately, this can often take several years to come to light and that is long after the proverbial horse has left the proverbial barn and all that remains is the pain of loss and the bad taste left in the investor's mouth from another betrayal of trust.

posted September 25, 2004 20:06            

quote:

---

Originally posted by tradingpennys:
Question: Do you trust Melvin?

---

tradingpennys: I'm not sure if it was me that you directed this post to, but I will answer it.

I like Melvin. I think he truly believes in what he says, though he may be misinformed or confused about facts. Although he may not be the best IR guy around, I don't think he would intentionally lie. He may, in his own way, shade facts to keep from disclosing sensitive information, but I do not believe he would intentionally lie to us. His enthusiasm and excitement seem to get the best of him and some take him way too seriously. I like enthusiasm and excitement.

It is my opinion that most stockholders are frustrated because we don't have answers as of yet, and most believe there is a reason for not having those answers. It is the very, very few that associate lack of information for mistrust. Those are two important and different issues. Just because the time frame dosen't coincide with the rumors or guestimates of some on these boards, doesn't indicate lying and mistrust.

There has been nothing that this company has done to warrant mistrust and I resent someone stating otherwise without facts. Some on this board mix fact with theory and present the total package as fact. Not good. The facts are all representative of a good company fighting to keep this business viable. Just because we don't know all the facts dosen't mean they misrepresent.

posted September 25, 2004 20:16            

Child, whenever UC shows his face, especially at race tracks, he looks more and more like a con man to me, not a “poker face”. Bluff??? Sure, and the “flush” is you and others flushing your CMKX shs and dividends down the drain.

Work, lack of patience…anxious??? What is there about that whole CMKX operation, UC and others that does not convey mistrust? I speak neither for you nor for others. It is just apparent from posts that more and more of the CMKX diehards are seeing the light or at least having serious reservations.

I’d say you folks have a foul wind blowing and it’s not Jeanne, Ivan or anything natural…but IS man made! And, all three of you bought in to it…known as CMKX.

What kind of answers can any of you give me to the many questions being asked? “Rantings” (an obvious diversion)! “Deuces and one-eyed jacks are wild” (kid’s game and meaningless)! “Patience and anxious for good news” (hasn’t happened to date and probably never will)! Stock has been doing nothing but going down!!!!!! TELLING PERFORMANCE!!!!

posted September 25, 2004 20:22            

"Noahltl, it’s not a question of a “lack of understanding”. Understanding what is going on is what makes the problem obvious."

posted September 25, 2004 20:28            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Wallace#1:
Work,

Only a fool would keep a known fool in an IR position! It is too important an entry to the public and to financing opportunities.

---

If you haven't noticed some of the prior posts here about Melvin, let me repeat. Melving is kept in that position to justify a paycheck so that he can care for his sick wife. Beleive it or not, Urban is just that way.

Shortl after Glenn got involved, Melvin was gagged about anything except drilling, of which he has some expertise.

When the reverse merger is done, Vicky Curran is already being "prepped" for the job as IR for SGGM.

posted September 25, 2004 20:36            

quote:

---

Originally posted by JBCak47:
Noah my friend

Dwman as well

How are you boys doing? A lot of happenings in the past two weeks with our stock!!

This is GOOOOOOOOOOODDDDDDD!

Did I mention I missed you guys!

3.8 Million STRONG! GO CMKX!

-Byrd-

---

JB...We missed you too. Just now got back home and saw your greetings. Thanks.
Don

posted September 25, 2004 20:38            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Wallace#1:
noahltl, you have been literally beaten over the head with fact after fact. You just plain do not listen or chose to ignore them. You keep spinning round and round with the same old redundant material re CMKX. Don't you get the least bit dizzy with all the SPINNING? Seems that you did last night! LOL

---

Hey Walace, let Noah and the rest of us spin. It's gonna be all over but the shouting in a couple of weeks. The shouting you will hear are the shouts of joy for those of us who are long and shouts of pain for the bashers who failed their bosses.

posted September 25, 2004 20:42            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Wallace#1:
noahltl, you have been literally beaten over the head with fact after fact. You just plain do not listen or chose to ignore them. You keep spinning round and round with the same old redundant material re CMKX. Don't you get the least bit dizzy with all the SPINNING? Seems that you did last night! LOL

---

Wallace, deduction is not evidence. That's all I see from you. You try to take some stock model that you are aware of and attempt to apply it to this stock. What you cannot see, is that this stock is not like any others. Even those who know pinks, know that this is true. You cannot apply models, therefore you cannot apply deductions based on those models. You are so convinced of yourself, that you believe that your opinion, is evidence. IT IS NOT.

This stock will not fit into any form or mold, until Roger is done getting it into full reporting status. Nor will the full story be known until security precautions are lifted.

Don't you think Kensington / DeBeers would love to know Urban and Roger are up to? Don't you think the MM's would love to know what's coming next? Why is it so difficult for you to understand why security is so important to this stock? As difficult as it may be for you, pretend for a moment that my theory on the UCAD dividend is true. Can you not see why they couldn't have told us about this in advance. The MM's wouldn't have placed the naked shares in peoples accounts and gotten caught.

There is more to come. More twists and turns and head fakes. We can't be told everything until it comes to pass. And the bashers will continue to use the companies inabilities to inform its shareholders, to turn around and bash them for it.

Once again, for the bashers, is this just a fun game for you? Haven't you already learned that we ain't movin' on some opinion that you carry here? It's a waste of time and thread space. We are only going to move on DD and PR.

posted September 25, 2004 20:45            

CMKX Pays +stk Per Share Record Date 08/31/2004
via CDS

September 25, 2004

Company: CMKM Diamonds, Inc. Common Stock Symbol: CMKX Amount: +stk Record Date: 08/31/2004 Payment Date: 10/18/2004

This information can be viewed at http://www.nasdaqtrader.com/dailylist/history/2004/Dividends/di09242004.stm

posted September 25, 2004 21:28            

Starting to get into the personal attack mode again, noahltl?

---------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------
Noahltl also wrote (edited)”

Wallace, deduction is not evidence. That's all I see from you.

Exactly my point, noahltl. You refuse to see the facts that I, and many others, have presented here about CMKX.

Noahltl also wrote:
You try to take some stock model that you are aware of and attempt to apply it to this stock.
Q: With “some unknown, unproven knowledge that you claim to have of Wall Street…”? Q: How is that possible? Contradictions!!!

Even those who know pinks, know that this is true. You cannot apply models, therefore you cannot apply deductions based on those models.
Q: And all that from an admitted securities novice?

This stock will not fit into any form or mold, until Roger is done getting it into full reporting status.
Q: Who told you that? UC? Glenn? Melvin? Any one of those pumpers you post, such as DrD, Sterling, Zen (? Now), people from CT?

Nor will the full story be known until security precautions are lifted.
Q: What security precautions? Who told you said “precautions” are in effect or in place”? Again, do you have inside info?

Don't you think Kensington / DeBeers would love to know Urban and Roger are up to?
Don't you think the MM's would love to know what's coming next?
A: 10 to 1 they already know......NOTHING.

There is more to come. More twists and turns and head fakes. We can't be told everything until it comes to pass.
Q: Just what is coming?
Q: "More twists and turns and head fakes"?
Not a very good looking picture...snakes, slithering, convolutions, misinformation, deception, etc.

And the bashers will continue to use the companies inabilities to inform its shareholders, to turn around and bash them for it.
A: “Inabilities” require changes in management to correct said inabilities. Shareholders can certainly be told the I/O, Balance Sheet, Earnings and Cash Flow information. Those things are an ongoing process in any company...even a donut shop.
They are always readily at hand since current up-to-date account books are required both in the US and in Canada. They are simply ledger entries.

We are only going to move on DD and PR.
A: You didn’t purchase on reliable DD and PR, so many of you do not know how to move when you DO see reliability.

posted September 25, 2004 21:31            

No wonder Wall St. Wally's gettin' stressed.
Anyone remember when those huge blocks were going thru and Wally said he got some .0001 shares from connections?
Anyone remember those strange 911 shares trades?
Jeff out about 48 hours before the UCAD divvy.
Alot of strange 'Twilight Zone' chit going on.