posted
no one knows how this will play out until tuesday but lets make this easier for everyone involved by doing dd and keeping personalities out of this. congrats for getting on the committee portman.
-------------------- I'm from Missouri - Show Me! Posts: 950 | From: Middle of Nowhere, Missouri | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
A Bump for the morning crowd...Yes, I am reminding everyone.
Good evening everyone. Thank you for the massive emails on your request to be on the shareholders committee. It was a daunting task to get this together this fast. We are now ready for the nominations. Please repost this link everywhere. We decided to post this on the boards first before the mass email as to not overload our site. The mass email will go out tomorrow. I would like to give a personal thanks to CEOHNUSA, NEW2MARKET, AND PORTMAN for their designing of the web page. We have worked very hard on this to put it together this fast. The company will be able to use our help. This is for SERIOUS NOMINATIONS ONLY.
As part of the procedure you will be asked to enter your email address. The only way you will be allowed to enter a nomination is to enter the exact email that you used. For instances where you sent me information on multiple people please get with them and as a group decide on your two nominations.
Phil has asked to not be nominated as he said he could not devote the proper time to the committee.
Please do not critique our work as we have tried our best to put this together as fast as possible and are working on very little sleep.
READ THE FIRST PAGE FULLY PRIOR TO PRESSING THE "I AGREE" BUTTON
Once the nominations have been made I will post a list of the nominations. I ask at that time the nominees please contact me to give your consent to be on the committee.
Please forward all email to dogman*cshdshareholdercommittee.com
posted
The SEC is the 500 pound gorilla. You play by their rules and I don't give two hoots about what Grassley is attempting. The SEC doesn't have to do anything -- whether that is right or wrong -- so live with it. It is the rules under which we are playing, so learn to play by them -- or if you want to test the rules -- do it with someone else's money. I hope they use the bond "codes" as his prison attire numbers.
Posts: 77 | Registered: Oct 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Wow, they took Morty's original post off, eliminated it. I sort of thought it should stay w/o all the insulting remarks of course or expletive deleted in places. It made for interesting reading.
Posts: 77 | Registered: Oct 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
repo just trying to make money here. had one go from 1.75 to 2.965 in a week and looking for some more action. sidebets would be a neat thing here imho.
-------------------- I'm from Missouri - Show Me! Posts: 950 | From: Middle of Nowhere, Missouri | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Oh repo - seer among seers, prognosticator among prognosticator -- you make a funny. In all seriousness, I do like some Cuban delicacies -- but Rat is not one of them. I think, no I hope, that a huge guy named Bubba shortly has rat buttcakes for dessert every night.
Posts: 77 | Registered: Oct 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by a surfer: This is from Tony Soprano on HSM
Here's a repost of what I posted before, and, some of us saw this coming:
I'm going to share a possible scenario with all of you that would not only drive the share price straight up but also absolutely kill the shorts.
It's clear that the SEC wanted to get Rufus but probably doesn't have a real issue with the Company.
So Rufus orchestrates his removal, which allows the BOD to hire an outsider from the financial industry with impeccable credentials.
The arrival of such an individual removes any doubt of the legitimacy of CSHD and triggers the rise of the stock once trading is resumed, which I assume, will be very quickly after the SEC and CSHD reach a settlement (possibly as soon as today).
With no questions of legitimacy remaining, the price moves toward the book value of $11 after both the release of the 10Q and distribution of the new shares.
We should all thank Rufus for being willing to orchestrate this string of events and not only protect our investments but set the stage for significant rewards in the very near future.
And, if the BOD hasn't yet chosen a replacement and needs some help, here's a name to consider: David Pottruck, the former co-CEO of Charles Schwab.
It sounds a little like BBAN. Rufus fired some dude, that dude got a shareholder committee together and fired Rufus. MAybe Rufus was trying to do the same thing. MAybe the shareholder committee was a way to protect himself, but he didn't get it done quickly enough.
Also, the company can now go back on any promise that Rufus made. "Guaranteed $15???? Oh no, that was Rufus' promise. He's been fired"
-------------------- "I will smack you in the mouth, I'm Neil Diamond"- Will Ferrell Posts: 4190 | From: Rhode Island | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Doniboy: Also, the company can now go back on any promise that Rufus made. "Guaranteed $15???? Oh no, that was Rufus' promise. He's been fired"
Actually I doubt that, The 10K states:
quote:The Corporation hereby chooses option (c) to reset the Share value to an equivalent of $15.00 by issuing additional shares to each shareholder of record as of the close of business on October 16, 2006, the issuance date of the Reset shares is October 30, 2006 10 business days from the filing of this form 10-KSB.
There must have been a vote by the BOD to have something like that happen.
Posts: 228 | From: Denver | Registered: Oct 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
"So Rufus orchestrates his removal, which allows the BOD to hire an outsider from the financial industry with impeccable credentials."
Interesting concept -- not. This leads to other questions and since this is recent news, you can't tell me it has been dd in the past.
Why wouldn't a competent BOD do this in the first place? So, why would we expect them to do it better now? That's the same thing we expected from Rufus -- didn't happen. The BOD has some questions to answer -- not thru a third party, SPR or anything else -- but directly. They owe that to the stockholders.
Posts: 77 | Registered: Oct 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Spooky -- that 10k, IMO, is not worth the paper it was printed on. Filings based on false pretenses or information -- we should not hang our hats on those.
Posts: 77 | Registered: Oct 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I'm in shock.........I don't know what to make of it....That must be why he's been quiet.....well maybe now he can post all he wants on the message boards & go on SPR but would it matter? I'm gonna miss that funny little cowboy but if it means we start trading again maybe it's a good thing....
I'm wondering how long can they go without a CEO?
If Rufus is the one with all the "connections" , now what?
-------------------- ..just remember....Family is EVERYTHING!! Posts: 3944 | From: Rochester, NY | Registered: Sep 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by voyager1951: Spooky -- that 10k, IMO, is not worth the paper it was printed on. Filings based on false pretenses or information -- we should not hang our hats on those.
So you are saying you think the company will put out another 10KSBA? I don't think so, but you are certainly entitled to your opinion.
Posts: 228 | From: Denver | Registered: Oct 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Jenna -- you sound like the group of runners in the middle of the desert when Forrest turned around and said "I'm tired. I think I'll go home now." "Well, what are we supposed to do?" runner said.
You are not alone, but it an example of why you can't put your faith in someone without knowing his intentions.
Posts: 77 | Registered: Oct 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Good point Spooky, I do think that they are bound by their 10K.
The good side of this is that it shows that CSHD is proactively taking strides toward getting the SEC off their back. The SEC has a win...hopefully that will be enough for them.
quote:Originally posted by Spooky:
quote:Originally posted by Doniboy: Also, the company can now go back on any promise that Rufus made. "Guaranteed $15???? Oh no, that was Rufus' promise. He's been fired"
Actually I doubt that, The 10K states:
quote:The Corporation hereby chooses option (c) to reset the Share value to an equivalent of $15.00 by issuing additional shares to each shareholder of record as of the close of business on October 16, 2006, the issuance date of the Reset shares is October 30, 2006 10 business days from the filing of this form 10-KSB.
There must have been a vote by the BOD to have something like that happen.
-------------------- "I will smack you in the mouth, I'm Neil Diamond"- Will Ferrell Posts: 4190 | From: Rhode Island | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Spooky -- I'm not an expert. I really don't know. I do believe we'll find out that the BV isn't even close to what we have envisioned. $11 -- no. 11 cents -- probably.
Posts: 77 | Registered: Oct 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
The fact is, I did fall in love with the little guy but like Gloria Gainer says, "I will survive!"
We will all survive..I just hope this was the move that saves this company....
quote:Originally posted by voyager1951: Jenna -- you sound like the group of runners in the middle of the desert when Forrest turned around and said "I'm tired. I think I'll go home now." "Well, what are we supposed to do?" runner said.
You are not alone, but it an example of why you can't put your faith in someone without knowing his intentions.
-------------------- ..just remember....Family is EVERYTHING!! Posts: 3944 | From: Rochester, NY | Registered: Sep 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
After "lurking" here on allstocks and gaining knowledge for over a year, I need to post my feelings about this stock. I want to thank all those who not only tirelessly research DD, but choose to share it with us. BB, Jenna, the Doctor, et al, thank you for all your help. I have owned this stock since FHAL and bought in at .19; I believe in this company and its business plan. I also believe that the holdings are legitimate and I take exception to those who say I'm drinking Guana Jungle Juice. I want to hear both sides of the argument and I don't blindly follow the crowd. That's why I bailed on QBID before it crashed . For that stock, the writing was on the wall....dilution. I don't see that here. To the bashers out there, give me something negative to ponder, not just your immature barbs. I couldn't tell you what repo says because I got sick of reading taunting statements and misplaced bravado. We got over that in 6th grade, so catch up to us.
CSHD is a microcosm of our economic system; in the 1980s, companies were raided and destroyed, but those that were had structure issues and stockholders made profits. Now, naked shorting combined with slander destroy companies before they ever leave start-up! What a shame but people are still greedy but now they're very LAZY. Just sit on your computer and spew lies and fear and watch the price drop. How disgusting.
I hope this can resolve our issue with the SEC and allow us to trade agian; no man is bigger than the company and I feel RPH may have violated the TRO with statements he made this week. Let's move on because I believe in this company, and not because it's a cult. That's blind faith based on an ideology. Let's wait and see what happens next.
Posts: 88 | From: NYC | Registered: Oct 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Spooky -- I'm not an expert. I really don't know. I do believe we'll find out that the BV isn't even close to what we have envisioned. $11 -- no. 11 cents -- probably.
Posts: 77 | Registered: Oct 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by voyager1951: Spooky -- I'm not an expert. I really don't know. I do believe we'll find out that the BV isn't even close to what we have envisioned. $11 -- no. 11 cents -- probably.
Your post did not deserve double posting status, as you stated you are not an expert so quit trying to play one..
Posts: 559 | From: MN | Registered: Apr 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Mornin' board! Rufus has set himself aside for the benefit of CSHD. This has been talked about for some time ... even he said he would be handing the baton to someone else. ... and given some of his statements and how and where he stated them, this is probably the price of his communication with us. I hardly expect Rufus to fade very far away!
-------------------- ... make you're decisions only on you're own DD ... Posts: 348 | From: Arizona | Registered: Jul 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I agree in I can't see anyway these guys have benefited if this is a scam. No dilution which is usually the biggest give away. I just don't see where they made any money off this. I'd still like a clearer pr about the removal of rufus. I guess that'll be our next 8-k that will be filed. Now if rufus is off the board which we don't know if he is. I think another indication of the current state of things will be to watch how rufus will carry himself now. Will he go on spr and say negative things about the company or say that this was the right move. His present actions could tell alot if we are privy to any of them.
posted
We were given big HINTS about this, think about it.
1) Rufus loves his horse ranch, that's where his heart is at, and said that's what he wants to do even mentioned the movie Flicka just days ago.
2) Rufus had made no secret that he was going to leave the company VERY SOON, he stated when this was all done that the "PR parade with all the ""NEW HIRES"" would be announced."
So where does that leave us?...
1) CSHD has stood before the SEC and will come out trading again IMO, SEC proved we have the bonds, hence, -WE ARE GOLDEN still.
2) Rufus leaves and takes all the scandel and bashers with him, leaving CSHD free to grow.
3) Rufus in 2 years is filthy rich, he does get to keep his shares does he not? And in 2 years the restriction is lifted and he's set for life. Rufus wins too.
3) OUR PPS can first go crazy NOW, we unlike other Penny stocks, have been checked out by the SEC. We ARE the real deal and have Billions on the books, that's our PPS value, not Rufus!
Now, IMO, the only thing we need to focus on is WHO will replace Rufus. I'm hoping now that the company has "stood it's ground" that CSHD will get a respected CEO.
All depends upon a favorable ruling yet,... -but it sounds to me like this is what had to be.
I don't think it's that big a deal, and like the PR states, it will be better for us shareholders and the company.
Let's admit it, Rufus is a little "back woods."
Going forward with this HUGE company (assuming a positive ruling), I would rather see a suit and tie CEO myself.
The stock isn't trading, so sit back, watch, CSHD will be up and running now in no time IMO.
CSHD is now acting like a big company, I see this as a great sign.
posted
Spooky, that was an accident. It seems that several others have double posted. Your slam was uncalled for and not correct.
Posts: 77 | Registered: Oct 2006
| IP: Logged |
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
. For that stock, the writing was on the wall....dilution. I don't see that here. To the bashers out there, give me something negative to ponder, not just your immature barbs. I couldn't tell you what repo says because I got sick of reading taunting statements and misplaced bravado. We got over that in 6th grade, so catch up to us. ![[Smile]](smile.gif)
And in 2 years the restriction is lifted and he's set for life. Rufus wins too.
