posted
I'll say it will reach 2.50 range on it's next strong run,, today i was holding 10,500 share and got pretty shook for a sec--turned off puter and went for a walk---all is good though...i bought more at .71,,, remember--mm's want your shares CHEAP
-------------------- GOOD LUCK TO ALL Posts: 37 | From: arkansas | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
PR said we will get a vote on this, once merger details are agreed upon and made.....I feel differently. I want the buy out to happen. I want my cash and to move on with AURC, TIDE, and the hurricane plays.......I have a feeling the merge might happne, but who knows......I hope and pray we get an official buy out announced
-------------------- GSUS - Eternal 100 Bagger! HCPC - my favorite potential into December Posts: 525 | From: nashville | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
If there is a merger,what will PPS be,sinec original news of merger made shares fall?
Posts: 249 | From: NY | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Looks like we could at least double on it at the present pps.
-------------------- Success is the ability to go from one failure to another with no loss of enthusiasm. -W. Churchill Posts: 89 | From: Beaumont, Texas | Registered: Feb 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Because merger causes more uncertainty about PPS as opposed to buyout, where you know the exact price the shares will end up at. So some people panic, sell-off early, causing more selling. Combined with a basher or two, bad news bears.
But cooler heads prevailed and the smart people were able to flip and make some nice coin.
Posts: 70 | Registered: Apr 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
One other thing we are not considering,what if no merger and no buyout? Then we are dead I guess.
Posts: 249 | From: NY | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by MickeyG: One other thing we are not considering,what if no merger and no buyout? Then we are dead I guess.
doubt it. NDOL is still sitting on a bunch of oil. that's why the buyout/merger is being talked about in the first place...
Posts: 2741 | From: Seattle | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
I don't mind someone advising people to sell NDOL. I do mind someone trying to make investers feel like fools who got taken, in order to profit off their fear.
Posts: 111 | Registered: Apr 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I have held all along ,even down to the 60's.Have to hold on.I have been in since .20,but all the uncertainty with the PR's makes me not know what to do with this.If a confirmation on a buyout or merger was announced that would ease the minds of everybody.2 times recently we got a PR about another PR coming,and now we get another PR we have to wait for,on or before 5/12.Like we need 4 more days of upset stomachs.Not bashing here.I just hope for some real confirmation.
Posts: 249 | From: NY | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
The more I read, the more I like our prospects:
A little about the collaborative effort between MOL Hungarian Oil and North West Oil's (SZNG) exploration of the west Siberian Surgutskiy-7 oil field:
"The Surgutskiy-7 oil field is estimated to have some 6 million tonnes of oil reserves and drillings of the first wells are scheduled for 2007, SZNG reported. MOL executives confirmed that negotiations were underway with the SZNG on joining works next year, adding that the company was also looking for other projects in the region."
Quote from President of North-Western Oil Group, Ernest Malyshev, on partnership with Oil India to purchase Udmurtneft: "We have submitted the bid for Udmurtneft with an open price. Our Indian partners who are taking the expenses on themselves are ready to pay between $15 and $20 million more than any other bidder"
MOL Hungarian Oil and Oil India are not going to enter partnerships/JVs with some lightweight. The more DD you do, the more you will realize that NDOL stock holders have a tiger by the tail. North West Oil (SZNG) looks to be very aggressive, does business with existing Oil monsters and is currently courting our beloved NDOL.
__________ Please do not base any of your investment decisions on anything I post. I strictly offer the above for your reading pleasure. Stocks are risky and you should be prepared to lose your entire initial investment.
Posts: 456 | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged |
i got freaked by the shake, THANKYOU PURLGURL---NOT!! inexperience on my part, still made some cash, but could have made alot more.
Posts: 53 | From: japan | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged |
management should have known the uncertainty the first pr would cause. They could have put out a proper pr the first time, so the question is. Why didnt they?????????
Posts: 53 | From: japan | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I am out. the pr could have said the company has two options instead of the way this whole thing was handled. It did serve a purpose and it was staged this way purposely. also $2.17 is very good price if you compare the sale of char and pkz.
Posts: 5 | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by hensley1971: one other thing,
management should have known the uncertainty the first pr would cause. They could have put out a proper pr the first time, so the question is. Why didnt they?????????
Okay, you're right on the money about this point. However, this company, IMO, has one weakness. Unfortunately, that weakness is explaining to it's shareholders just what the hell is going on. Read between the lines here. Many that called the company from 4/6 to 4/28 were told that we could either see a buyout or a "joint venture." There's clue number one, right there, that the merger was always present in their minds. I feel it's been their top hope all along, with the trick being the task of convincing North West to go for it. That's why, I feel, that we heard nothing officially about the merger until today. I think they finally got North West to agree to it this past weekend. They damn straight couldn't come out in a PR and say anything about a merger if they weren't sure they could sell North West on it. Thats why some of us heard it over the phone. I've read a few people stating the the company knew this all along, and what a bunch of *******s for not telling us. Can you see where I'm going with this? They got out the PR to us last week, like we were begging them to do. They knew they had to get a PR out because they were past the deadline. But, all they could talk about was the buyout at the time. Plus, they gave us the number to go on, 2.17.
This company isnt the least bit crooked, and they definitely weren't trying to decieve us, IMO. They just gave us all the information they were able to, at a time when they were forced to release a good PR to investors.
I know a merger doesn't sit well with a lot of you. I've read it plenty here and other places. A lot of you want your quick cash so you can hurry down the line to your next stocks.
I wish that I could change people's way of thinking on this one. I have no right to, so I definitely won't, but I wish I could. North-West is a very big player. A merger, imho, would end up doubling 2.17 by the end of summer. A listing to the OTCBB or AMEX would be unreal for this stock. We would go from JUNIOR Oil, To BIG Oil.
I know a lot of you don't want to hear this because your favorite hurricane or bird flu stock needs your money, but should this merger go through, "A Premium To Your $2.17" is without a doubt what I expect.
posted
NoWhenToHoldThem..... I am in total agreement. I have said all along that I did not think that a buy out would happen. This company has the potential for $10.00/share or more by the end of summer....And God forbid that a hurricane should hit the gulf. We could see even higher stock prices. I will take the buy out if I must, but I would prefer the merger and up listing to one of the BIG Boards. With the merger we will qualify to go to the AMEX, start pumping out the 6500 Barrels/day and let the revs speak for themselves.
posted
Yo Nowhen, I'm by no means a businessman, I just like being in the right place at the right time. If we do merge with North west, they will have to issue shares and have an IPO in order to go public if i'm not mistaken. Unlees they can ride on NDOL somehow, but thats the kind of stuff thats over my head. What is your take on that or are you like me.
Posts: 4245 | From: SMALLVILLE USA | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
Unfortunately, it wouldn't do me much good to speculate right now. Mainly because there are a number of scenarios that could come into play with the merger. There are a vast array of ways to do this. But one thing I believe to be true is that, since they're private, North West would take the NDOL ticker, and utilize the Monimpex listing skills to get on the AMEX.
I'm somewhat versed on mergers. Invester, I'm sure, could spell these out for us since it's his area of expertise, but all he'd be able to do is give us a bunch of different scenarios at this point.
[ May 08, 2006, 21:33: Message edited by: NoWhen2HoldEm ]
quote:Originally posted by cm3i: NoWhenToHoldThem..... I am in total agreement. I have said all along that I did not think that a buy out would happen. This company has the potential for $10.00/share or more by the end of summer
Yep cm3i, I havent said all along that I didn't think it would happen, but I sure have said that I was hoping that it wouldnt happen. The possiblities of this in the longhaul are just enormous.
posted
Okay DIGDOUGH Buddy, Here is my DD on mergers:
When a merger or acquisition is conducted, there are various ways the acquiring company can pay for the assets it will receive. The acquirer can pay cash outright for all the equity shares of the target company, paying each shareholder a specified amount for each share. Or, it can provide its own shares to the target company's shareholders according to a specified conversion ratio (i.e. for each share of the target company owned by a shareholder, the shareholder will receive X number of shares of the acquiring company). Acquisitions can be made with a mixture of cash and stock, or with all stock compensation, which is called a "stock-for-stock" merger.
When the merger is stock-for-stock, the acquiring company simply proposes to the target firm a payment of a certain number of its equity shares in exchange for all of the target company's shares. Provided the target company accepts the offer (which includes a specified conversion ratio), the acquiring company essentially issues certificates to the target firm's shareholders, entitling them to trade in their current shares for rights to acquire a pro rata number of the acquiring firm's shares. The acquiring firm basically issues new shares (adding to its total number of shares outstanding) to provide shares for all the target firm's shares that are being converted.
This action, of course, causes the dilution of the current shareholders' equity, since there are now more total shares outstanding for the same company. However, at the same time, the acquiring company obtains all of the assets and liabilities of the target firm, thus approximately neutralizing the effects of the dilution. Should the merger prove beneficial and provide sufficient synergy, the current shareholders will gain in the long run from the additional appreciation provided by the assets of the target company.
posted
morning all... well my morning. opened up my account and to no avail, nice EOD run. amazing the change of mood on this board once the pps went up. not complaining. makes better reading wehn ppl aren't fighting thats all. and what DD do we need to do purl. the only reason why it flopped like this was a panic about the news... i'm pretty open minded but i'm not even willing to admit your right. as i said before... just a change in news, not a pump and dump as you said it would be. well, end of week should be promising IMO especially on friday once PR is released... GLTA!
-------------------- NDOL(well before the crash)FPPL BLDV CSHD WWEN? Posts: 600 | From: CO, WI, contracting in Iraq... | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Pay close attention to the final sentence in the "stock for stock" scenario:
"Should the merger prove beneficial and provide sufficient synergy, the current shareholders will gain in the long run from the additional appreciation provided by the assets of the target company."
posted
Wow! what a ride today. I hope tomorrow is better. This is just the second shake I have been through. I am glad I held and didn't sell any of my Ndol stock. Next time I am going to sell some off to protect profits. It was a good lesson for me.
Posts: 109 | From: parts unknown | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
Wastech, Inc. Announces Financing Agreement in Excess of $2 Million with Largest Shareholder CHARLESTON, S.C., May 3, 2006 (PRIMEZONE) -- Wastech, Inc. (Pink Sheets:WTCH) (the "Company") today is pleased to announce it has reached an agreement with its largest shareholder, Environmental Energy Services, Inc. (Pink Sheets:EESV) for additional financing valued in excess of $2,000,000.
Proceeds from the funding are allocated to the fulfillment of 1) the successful Closing of the Company's recently announced acquisition of approximately 44,000 acres of subsurface coal and mineral rights under enriched acreage throughout West Virginia, as well as its strategic purchase of oil and gas rights within exactly 5,898.49 acres in Fayette County; 2) the completion of pilot trucks on the Company's patented, new waste technologies; 3) the continual progress of Company auditing and reporting requirements; and 4) additional working capital through 2007.
Pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement, among other things, Environmental Energy will initially contribute $741,500 in funding in exchange for 14,830,000 shares and, on or before August 25, 2006, an additional funding requirement of $1,130,000 in exchange for 22,600,000 shares. By and through this and previous agreements, Environmental Energy may achieve in excess of 50% of Wastech common stock by February 2008. Further, Environment Energy was granted an additional nominee to the Company's existing one-member Board of Directors.
Mr. Richard D. Tuorto, President and CEO commented on the Agreement "as a milestone for the Company's operational and financial future, one built not only on its waste holdings and expertise, but also on alternate-energy technologies and their beneficial impact for our environment."
Mr. A. Leon Blaser, Ph.D., President and CEO of EESV, and advisory Board member to Wastech commented: "This Agreement provides all the tools for the success of Wastech into the future, while solidifying Environmental Energy's control and equity position in the process. I am pleased with the outcome, and consider the result a victory for both companies."
The above release should be read in conjunction with submissions of the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 8-K, and can be obtained online at www.sec.gov or by request directly to Wastech.
Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: The statements contained in this news release which are not historical facts may be "forward-looking statements" that involve risks and uncertainties which could cause actual results to differ materially from those currently anticipated. For example, statements that describe Wastech's hopes, plans, objectives, goals, intentions, or expectations are forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements made herein are only made as of the date of this news release. Numerous factors, many of which are beyond Wastech's control, will affect actual results. Wastech undertakes no obligation to publicly update such forward-looking statements to reflect subsequent events or circumstances. This news release should be read in conjunction with Wastech's annual report on Form 10-KSB for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2002, 2001 and other filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.
posted
I wrote an e-mail to North-West a few days ago and got this response. It doesn't help too much but I figured I'd share it. I actually got it a while ago, but for some reason the date on this russian e-mail says 2002 so it went way back in my inbox. Not sure why.
From: "North-West Oil Group JSC" <szng*szng.ru> View Contact Details Add Mobile Alert To: "Donald ******" <**********yahoo.com> Subject: Re: Nord Oil Purchase Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 12:07:40 +0400
Dear Sirs,
Management of both Nord Oil International Inc. and North-West Oil Group are still carrying negotiations. The unequivocal information will be given over the next several days.
With kind regards,
North-West Oil Group
-------------------- "I will smack you in the mouth, I'm Neil Diamond"- Will Ferrell Posts: 4190 | From: Rhode Island | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Seems the over all market sentiment is more positive than negative on the merger happening.....I've been checking other boards and folks are positive about it all more than negative. That is a good sign for the PPS to go up. We shall see between tomorrow and friday the 12th.....>Will be very very interesting to see how this all unfolds..........if the buy out is on, I see a ton of buying...........if the merger is on, I see more buying than selling.....either way, I see the PPS going up on the next PR.......If the merger is on, I see a positive and carefully orchestrated PR coming to us describing the benefits of the merge and the forcast of $2.17 a share will be out. They will describe how the "premium" added value of our stock is now worth like $2.40 +. On such a PR, I see the PPS souring, then profit taking coming in and the price settling close to $1.70 - $2? We shall see, but expect a very positive PR and expect there to be accumulation on a merge, as this will be huge for those wanting in long, but shorts will make this a roller coaster, so expect a nice ride out of this coming up near end of week and into next week if they are late friday with PR.......I'm starting to get very excited again........I think the next PR is going to make us some bank if you're playing some flipper shares and will be great for your long shares..........
-------------------- GSUS - Eternal 100 Bagger! HCPC - my favorite potential into December Posts: 525 | From: nashville | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
The emergence of new oil companies suggests that the present ruling team in Russia is taking ownership of economic assets
In recent years, thriving new private-owned oil companies have emerged in the Russian energy sector. We know of the existence of two of them: Russneft and the North-West Oil Group (also known by its Russian acronym SZNG). Indirect evidence suggests that the success of these companies may be because President Putin's team has been granted property rights to them. Putin's people came to power after the principal share of state property had already been divided as a result of the 1990s privatisations. The present process whereby private fortunes are being accumulated to a great extent requires a new redistribution of economic assets.
New private oil companies
The fact of Russneft and the North-West Oil Group's dynamic development became apparent on the occasion of a tender for 49 percent of shares in Slovakia's oil transport enterprise, Transpetrol. Both of the Russian companies made competing bids for the Slovak company. The manner in which the two businesses were established, as well as their sources of financing, are unclear. Both started as intermediaries trading oil, both in Russia and abroad. They built up their present position by taking over small and usually disputable assets in the Russian oil sector. Russneft, registered in 2002, is owned entirely by Mikhail Gutseriyev and his relatives. In 2005 the company produced more than 17 million tons of oil, thus establishing itself among the top ten oil companies in the Russian Federation. As for SZNG, all that is known is that the company was incorporated in 2004 and has ambitious plans, but its ownership structure and economic results are still unknown.
Businesses and the ruling elite
The emergence and dynamic development of new privately-owned oil companies would not have been possible without the Kremlin's knowledge and approval. The present power elite is particularly interested in the energy sector, as it has demonstrated in recent years by bringing the most important gas and oil establishments under state control; this has compelled the remaining private companies to be loyal, and restricted foreign investors' access to the sector. The connections between Russneft and SZNG on the one hand, and the ruling elite on the other, have been noted by the press, although they are usually only sporadically mentioned. For example, the Russian media have established a link between Gutseriyev, the head of Russneft, and numerous economic scandals in Russia; interestingly, however, he has never been brought to account for any of these. On the other hand, his services to the country have been appreciated, and Gutseriyev has been awarded many medals and state distinctions (including for his participation in special operations). In addition, Russneft has benefited from the UN's Oil for Food programme for Iraq. In a report by CIA advisor Charles Dolfer, it was claimed that Saddam Hussein had granted Gutseriyev quotas for the export of nearly 12 million tons of Iraqi oil. Knowledge of the links between SZNG and the government is limited to the fact that the company has been working closely with Gazprom and other Russian oil companies, as it revealed in a paid announcement published in the Russian press in which it thanked these companies for their contribution to SZNG's success. In addition, the CEO Ernest Malyshev boasted that his company had played a role in the reconstruction of St. Petersburg before the celebration of the city's 300th anniversary. Particularly impressive amounts were spent on modernising the palace compound in Strelno near St. Petersburg, where the Russian President's residence is located.
Conclusions
One possible interpretation of the new companies' successes in the oil sector is that it is the current political elite amassing economic assets. Most of Putin's people, who came to power with him in 2000, did not have any economic base of their own. The greater portion of state property had already been divided up in the 1990s. Initially, Putin's team profited from managing state property. The present process suggests that this group is proceeding to the next stage of 'getting rich' -developing its own business base. In addition to the new oil companies, RosUkrEnergo may serve as a further example of this kind of activity - this gas trade intermediary consolidated its market position in the aftermath of the Russian-Ukrainian gas dispute, and co-operates with Gazprom. Building private fortunes using political power is hardly a novelty in Russia. The Russian state leadership acquired business possessions in a particularly dynamic manner in the 1990s. Interestingly, however, the present team came to power claiming that state interests were superior to private interests, that it was necessary to develop state capitalism, that the state needed to take control of the most profitable sectors of the economy, and that it had to eliminate those intermediaries who had been stealing the state's profits. If the above interpretation of the emergence of new oil companies is correct, as the 2008 presidential election approaches, we should expect more private companies to arise, both in the energy sector and elsewhere. However, as most assets in Russia have already been divided, this process is unlikely to be smooth. Various interest groups will compete for the assets available, and new fortunes will develop at the expense of existing empires.
Iwona Wiśniewska
Appendix
The owners of Russneft revealed its shareholding structure in late 2005, as they prepared the company's initial public offering. They disclosed that 70 percent of shares belonged to Mikhail Gutseriyev, and the remaining 30 percent to his relatives. Within just over 3 years, the company managed to acquire over thirty small production companies, three refineries and a chain of petrol stations. In 2005 its production increased from 10 million tons of oil (2004) to 17 million tons. This was possible because the company had taken over new fields. Russneft plans to continue the rapid expansion of its production. As Gutseriyev was starting up the present business, he co-operated closely with the Swiss-registered Glencore, an intermediary company trading oil and oil products (it controls about 3% of world oil trade) and metallurgic products. Russneft was initially built on assets (oil fields, chemical plants) taken over from the Russian-Belarusian company Slavneft, of which Gutseriyev was head until 2003. Russneft has also benefited from the collapse of Yukos, as it took over that company's smaller assets, including its contract with Hungary's MOL for oil production in the Zapadno-Malobalykskoye field.
As for North-West Oil Group (SZNG), it is known that during the year and a half of its existence, the company managed to gain direct access to Russian fields (it holds six production licences) and to establish itself in the sectors of oil processing and trade in oil and oil products. SZNG has also reported that it is working with Hungary's MOL (a company called SZNG-MOL was created to bring online the Surgut-7 field in Russia, which had been taken over from Yukos). An SZNG daughter company, called North-West Oil Company S.A., is registered in Geneva; its task is to intensify co-operation with foreign partners (mostly in terms of the sale of oil and oil products).
Posts: 119 | From: home | Registered: Apr 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I still want the buy out= quick cash but either way, the merge will benefit shareholders.......it has to or they will just take the $2.17 deal........so expect a nice PR and added premium to the worht of the stock........I said earlier like $2.40..........it could be $3-$4 announced..........that would be incredible! I could see that happening in the next PR.......be ready........I bet we see the PR wed or thurs...........man, I AM PUMPED UP for this..........imagine our shares going to $1.90, then down to $1.60, then up over $2.00, then back down to $1.80, then to $2.20 on another PR, then $2.50 as they by pass OTCBB listing and shoot for the AMEX......now that would be red hot!
-------------------- GSUS - Eternal 100 Bagger! HCPC - my favorite potential into December Posts: 525 | From: nashville | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
"...what DD do we need to do purl. the only reason why it flopped like this was a panic about the news... i'm pretty open minded but i'm not even willing to admit your right. as i said before... just a change in news, not a pump and dump as you said it would be."
Part of research is predicting panic selling. This type of selling (or frenzy buying) is predictable. There is "something not right" about this company which is a hint. This initial buy-out agreement is and was no guarantee. That alone instructs you to be careful of a failed deal which initiates panic selling. A good trader can and could see this one in the works; highly predictable.
Experience dictates you do not hold a stock like this, when highly volatile, for more than a few days and NEVER hold a stock like this over a weekend; ALWAYS dump on Friday, then buy back in on Monday or Tuesday if no negative events.
Stocks like this, you must use risk management. A lot of people lost a lot of money on this one because they ignored warning signs and because they did not reduce their risks.
Part of successful trading is playing the odds. Traders should assess all possible events, score risks, then act accordingly; better to take a small profit than a huge loss.
Pigs get slaughtered.
**
I did not write this stock is a pump and dump but will do so now. I wrote many known pump sites are pumping this stock and many in this thread are very clearly pumping this stock. I also wrote behavior of management is typical of a pump and dump scheme. Many warning signs are apparent and many ignored those warnings.
I now write this is a pump and dump stock being confirmed today by pr news. Not only did management of this company initiate this panic selling, they also added confusion and fear with conflicting news; they screwed up.
Bottom line is management, through their written statements, have made it clear their intent is to drive share price up and this is their only concern. This confirms a pump and dump scheme.
A realistic person will read their news to date and quickly realize this company is pumping their stock, quite clearly.
Review the ancient IBZT thread here for a classic example and parallel example. I warned people in that thread and they reacted just like you boys have and are. All lost money and CEO was nailed by the SEC.
I was labeled a basher but they lost their money.
Nothing illegal taking place but actions by this company are both unethical and irresponsible. Same is true for posters here.
Many here are "telling" readers profits are guaranteed. This is not true. This buy-out, this merger, neither are guaranteed. Those of us with experience have watched this game played literally hundreds of times. Companies promise this, promise that and never deliver. Very easy to promise this and that, then issue an excuse, "The deal was not completed for blah blah reason."
During this insiders pocket millions of bucks, your bucks.
Behavior of selected persons here directly indicates they are pumping; very typical Raging Bull behavior. She is a basher! She is an idiot! She is lying! You are NOT to talk to her and NOT to listen to her!
All along they are pumping and hoping to take your money, which they did and will do.
I am not one to take you boys by the hand, then lead through rough waters. I dropped some hints, added factual information, asked tough questions.
Your not taking those hints, your losing money is your fault despite best attempts to blame this on everyone but yourself. You are solely responsible for your actions.
posted
The Bit** is back!! With still no clue.Guess she doe snot know most people got this stock under 50 cents and have not lost any real money.Over $1 right now is just fine. Here is a Fatgurl quote: I did not write this stock is a pump and dump but will do so now. I wrote many known pump sites are pumping this stock and many in this thread are very clearly pumping this stock. I also wrote behavior of management is typical of a pump and dump scheme.
Obviously knows nothing about this company,only thing they may have done wrong is put out a PR which investors did not quite understand,but the smart ones are the ones that stayed.I am sure we won't be hearing from fatgurl by the end of next week on this one.
Posts: 249 | From: NY | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged |
"...and NEVER hold a stock like this over a weekend; ALWAYS dump on Friday...."
There is a stock we periodically ridicule and laugh over. Raven Moon. This is one of the most known scam stocks.
Years back, I suckered for their pump and dump scam, lost a little over six-hundred dollars. Could have been worse but I practice risk control. I jumped out with the first warning signal, just in the nick of time.
Raven Moon has a years long habit of announcing dilution, announcing reverse splits, on a Friday after market close. I neglected to dump on a Friday, dilution was announced and I place sell orders Friday night for Monday morning, several cents below my buy price. I escaped but almost all others did not and lost lots of money.
Since then, if a stock is questionable, is hinky, my rule is to ALWAYS dump on Friday. I have never violated that rule.
Hold your hand up if you wish you had dumped last Friday.
My, oh my, look at all those hands held high.
Find someone else to blame for your mistakes. Annoy me and I will remind you of your foolish behavior and lack of experience.
Ain't I a real *****?
I am also a caring person who truly wants others to make profits, but make those profits in a fair and square manner of which you can be proud.
quote:Originally posted by Purl Gurl: "I look forward to investing with you in the future."
I am looking forward to relieving you of your money.
MUUHAHAHAHAHAAA!
Purl Gurl
Does anybody need to see anymore than this?
Here's an idea, I'll post in poem-type form. That way, it takes up more space and makes me look more intelligent. I'll take these fools' money, then I'll come back like I'm ready to educate them. They won't even know what hit them a second time.
Nasty b*tch aren't ya?
Guess what? I don't care if they sell or hold. I'm not here to pump. I'm here to ride this thing to the top, and to converse with ohters that feel the same. The same as your pitiful ass feels. But you'd just love to keep getting them cheap shares off those poor inexperienced investors. So much so that you're willing to try to take them twice.
You're definitely an Indian Outlaw.....only half ruthless bit*h and Choctaw.
I think you know what that means.My time is done on this one,no more responses to it's comments.
Posts: 249 | From: NY | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged |
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
