posted
Source, instead of fishing around for more hilarious clip art why don't you address the question of what the transfer from Alexander back to RPH was all about? Did Alexander decide this thing was wrong and the SEC advised him the best thing to do was to hand the reins back over the Rufus and issue an ambigous PR? Do you really think Alexander knew that things were not right and independently decided that was the best thing to do?
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by thesource: Maybe the bonds were real but I have not found anything even remotely pointing to that . If someone can verify the bonds were infact real , please provide me a link . I have not found anything close to it so far .
quote:Originally posted by highhopes: Source, instead of fishing around for more hilarious clip art why don't you address the question of what the transfer from Alexander back to RPH was all about? Did Alexander decide this thing was wrong and the SEC advised him the best thing to do was to hand the reins back over the Rufus and issue an ambigous PR? Do you really think Alexander knew that things were not right and independently decided that was the best thing to do?
I think MA found himself wading around knee deep in $hit wearing some flip flops .
Or maybe he had a better offer come along from a trillion dollar company , who knows ????
-------------------- ----- Game Over -----
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by thesource: Maybe the bonds were real but I have not found anything even remotely pointing to that . If someone can verify the bonds were infact real , please provide me a link . I have not found anything close to it so far .
posted
Crab- The our street piece of crap from ihub has been complaining about Conversion to the Sec since Rufus mentioned the $15 a share deal back in July.
quote:Originally posted by CRab: The SEC does not investigate a company without complaints...did CSHD file complaints on themselves? Or was it perhaps someone that didn't have enough info, maybe it was someone with some sort of alterior motive? The simple answer is you or I or anyone else here for that matter doesn't know, so don't place blame where it isn't due.
I'm not saying certain things might not have been handled poorly, but I am saying me, you and everyone else needs to realize we aren't seeing the whole picture here.
quote:Originally posted by thesource: NO ONE ELSE .......
posted
I direct your attention to the legal definition of "dismissal without prejudice."
dismissal n. 1) the act of voluntarily terminating a criminal prosecution or a lawsuit or one of its causes of action by one of the parties. 2) a judge's ruling that a lawsuit or criminal charge is terminated. 3) an appeals court's act of dismissing an appeal, letting the lower court decision stand. 4) the act of a plaintiff dismissing a lawsuit upon settling the case. Such a dismissal may be dismissal with prejudice, meaning it can never be filed again, or dismissal without prejudice, leaving open the possibility of bringing the suit again if the defendant does not follow through on the terms of the settlement.
If the terms of the settlement w/BBAN says never be involved in similar actions again, RPH could have these old charges rear up and bite him in the arse.
Also, how does someone with no assets in 02/05, come up with this huge ranch and horses et. al.? I got to be doing something wrong. Oh yeah -- I invest in penny stocks.
IP: Logged |
posted
Yeah he realized that he was wading knee deep and decided the right thing to do, on behalf of the shareholders he was responsible to, was to issue a PR saying that all was good and run for the hills. You can bet your a$$ that if he even whiffed a problem he would have gone to the SEC for guidance given the circumstances.
IP: Logged |
posted
My point? What is your point? You have given yet another example that the courts don't "work" and you can't believe all that you read and see...so what is your point?
Sorry you bought this too high...and lost money..sell..cut your losses and move on...there is no court that will prove to you that this isn't a scam...you have made up your mind... Move along lil doggie...move along...
quote:Originally posted by thesource: And OJ was found innocent of murder ..... anyone think he's innocent ? Whats your point 10 ?
Maybe the bonds were real but I have not found anything even remotely pointing to that . If someone can verify the bonds were infact real , please provide me a link . I have not found anything close to it so far .
-------------------- #1 Rule: Protect your capital! #2 Rule: Never fall for the BS on the boards!
IP: Logged |
posted
They never mentioned bonds... it was a "guaranteed aquisition of a line of credit". Most likely based on bond deals that had not been inked as of yet. They are inked now, and that is all that counts.
posted
That is kinda the point the I was trying to make 6digits, lol. I just wanted those reading to come to that conclusion themseslves. If someone reads something and figures it out for themselves it usually means a little more.
Although in this case...I seriously doubt anyone reading hasn't already come to their own conclusion regarding the bond ownership.
quote:Originally posted by 6digits: Crab- The our street piece of crap from ihub has been complaining about Conversion to the Sec since Rufus mentioned the $15 a share deal back in July.
posted
If all of your family's assets are in trusts, then you don't personally own anything.
quote:Originally posted by wv1973: Also, how does someone with no assets in 02/05, come up with this huge ranch and horses et. al.? I got to be doing something wrong. Oh yeah -- I invest in penny stocks.
posted
Unfortunately, it seems to me from the discussion with attorney Black as reported by TM, it doesn't seem that those documents filed in GA court are convincing the SEC of RPH's claim of ownership.
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by CRab: If all of your family's assets are in trusts, then you don't personally own anything.
quote:Originally posted by wv1973: Also, how does someone with no assets in 02/05, come up with this huge ranch and horses et. al.? I got to be doing something wrong. Oh yeah -- I invest in penny stocks.
I was going to say "Living trust" too CRab. Nothing smarter in my opinion.
quote:Originally posted by wv1973: Unfortunately, it seems to me from the discussion with attorney Black as reported by TM, it doesn't seem that those documents filed in GA court are convincing the SEC of RPH's claim of ownership.
Must not have been very convincing. Considering the judge did NOT honor the complaint from the SEC regarding disolving the company and ousting RPH from office- never to serve as company officer again.
Proof from CSHD was probably some BMP doctored up in Adobe that put RPH name on a bazillion dollar bill.
Or was something sufficient enough to keep the company from being shut down and RPH NOT getting thrown into the general population of sing sing?
Perhaps the Judge is a shareholder and ignored the monopoly money RPH had in the Corp Safe.
-------------------- Got CSHD? Its fun
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by TaxBack04: They never mentioned bonds... it was a "guaranteed aquisition of a line of credit". Most likely based on bond deals that had not been inked as of yet. They are inked now, and that is all that counts.
Are you referring to the BBAN bonds promised by Rufus ? The bonds were said to be real and actually sitting in a bank in Mississippi if I remember correctly . This was said by Rufus when he ran Enhancement Holdings .
-------------------- ----- Game Over -----
IP: Logged |
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Mad]](mad.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
