Join Date: Oct 2006 Posts: 59 I will say this again, and I hope you as shareholders will act on it. You must understand how powerful a federal judge is. It is imperative for the shareholders to have him as an ally. For your sake you must use your collective efforts to expose the fraud that has been perpetrated towards all of you and seek restitution. Millions were lost on behalf of the SEC's baseless accusations and their retarted efforts to discredit the company.
If you can prove the judge that you as shareholder's were able to find the validity of the bonds yourselves based on your dd I have no doubt the judge will grant you restitution in some form of way. As shareholders you must protect your investments as they represent your livelihood. Alot is at stake and you must press your problems and concerns to the judge and let him know how you feel so he can grasp the urgency to correct the harm done to you. I urge all of you to take a stance together as one, and fight for what is rightfully yours.
-------------------- #1 Rule: Protect your capital! #2 Rule: Never fall for the BS on the boards! Posts: 8890 | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by St. Matthew: Tex...Uncle Rudy,
I post this with all due respect.
I have talked to Tut several times. He is a middle aged gentleman who is extremely intelligent, friendly and informed. He has been CEO of a couple of companies in his lifetime. He is extremely careful about what information he passes on to me and what he keeps to himself. He has NEVER compromised himself by passing any information that could be construed as “insider information”. Believe me…I have formulated my questions in a manner that would have made it very easy for an amateur to stumble or exaggerate in their response.
Through the DD he and his partners perform, he is extremely confident about the outcome of this situation. IMHO he knows way more than you can imagine. He just can't divulge all of his info until it happens or until the company puts out a PR. It is also my opinion that he knows a lot about this stock from the outside looking in. What I mean is...he knows international business and he knows bond trading for the use in which CSHD intends to use them. Perhaps, he knows the likes of which CSHD has contracted with in Europe and / or the Middle East. He knows the potential of this type of business.
There are many people who are “in-the-know” about this company who support Tut 100%. As a matter of fact, Rufus stated on SPR last week that Tut was right about 99% of the time and that we should “listen to him”.
I totally agree with Port…there are times when I wish Tut would not post just for the sake of posting. I get tired of the hype and then the predictions are not being met. This should be proof that he is not an insider. You have to understand how much he wants this to happen for the shareholders…problem comes when the guys over at HSM start egging him on for a post every day at about 3-4 in the afternoon. He feels that he is obligated at this point for fear of shareholders losing faith. We do need every shareholder we can get to hold strong at this point.
Look, you can have your opinion about him, me, or whoever you want on this and the other boards, but please don’t pass / spread judgment until you have met the person you are complaining about. You just might be surprised.
quote:Originally posted by T e x:
quote:Originally posted by T e x:
quote:Originally posted by portman:
quote:Originally posted by T e x:
quote:Originally posted by unclerudy: So why did we start a new thread? Just wondering...
Oh yah, and for those who don't know my feelings about Tut,
F him in his stupid anonymous, vague, never going to tell you anything of any worth A-hole. I hate that guy, especially now that he is talking down to us. Put out or shut up!!!
Bob asked for the new thread.
Tut? college kid in my opinion...I figger he piggy-backed on the play for his own amusement.
my 2 cents...
Not often I get to tell you that you are wrong.
I do not hang on his every word but Tut does know things...just not everything. Oh, and Yes...Tex I know factualy your assumption is wrong.
well, as posted elsewhere, I haven't seen nearly as many posts as some have...but in those I *have* read, the tone strikes me as collegiate, frat-boyish...
Anyway...so what's the "facts" ?
repost for da Portman...
lol, "passed judgment" ?
No matter "who" Tut "really is," his/her posts read like a college kid's...at least, those I have read.
As far as "rallying the troops," I think that's a bunch of hooie...as the thread-title implies, DD and news are far more valuable than the "Bow before me" ramblings I've seen...
quote:Originally posted by unclerudy: So why did we start a new thread? Just wondering...
Oh yah, and for those who don't know my feelings about Tut,
F him in his stupid anonymous, vague, never going to tell you anything of any worth A-hole. I hate that guy, especially now that he is talking down to us. Put out or shut up!!!
Bob asked for the new thread.
Tut? college kid in my opinion...I figger he piggy-backed on the play for his own amusement.
my 2 cents...
Not often I get to tell you that you are wrong.
I do not hang on his every word but Tut does know things...just not everything. Oh, and Yes...Tex I know factualy your assumption is wrong.
well, as posted elsewhere, I haven't seen nearly as many posts as some have...but in those I *have* read, the tone strikes me as collegiate, frat-boyish...
Anyway...so what's the "facts" ?
repost for da Portman...
Now now Tex...I am not so easily baited.
He has been on SPR more than once. Once with RPH, Sabra and MA. You can check the SPR archives...but I do not recall the date. I would truly like to share more...but I cannot.
posted
Is it anticipated that any significant change in results of operations from the corresponding period for the last fiscal year will be reflected by the earnings statements to be included in the subject report or portion thereof?
[ ] Yes [X] No
trying to add something constructive to the discussion. does the corresponding period for the lasr fiscal year mean from 7/1/05 to 9/30/05? wasn't there a large loss during that period last year or am i wrong again?
-------------------- I'm from Missouri - Show Me! Posts: 950 | From: Middle of Nowhere, Missouri | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Chart walker: right, so WHEN is the court ruling due?????
Anyone??????
I don't think anyone knows this at this time. If they do, they sure haven't shared. From what Rufus said, the SEC didn't know. I wouldn't have thought it was up to the SEC though. Either way, I need to know so I can schedule that day off!
Posts: 1028 | From: Georgia | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
"(3) Is it anticipated that any significant change in results of operations from the corresponding period for the last fiscal year will be reflected by the earnings statements to be included in the subject report or portion thereof?
[ ] Yes [X] No"
This still seems weird. There have been all kinds of significant changes...right? I hope I just don't understand this one...anyone want to splain it to me?
Posts: 1028 | From: Georgia | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
The amendments also shorten the Form 8-K filing deadline for most items to four business days after the occurrence of an event triggering the disclosure requirements of the form.
posted
are we aware of any significant (financial) changes? I know we were ordered to file an ammended 10k asap - but we don't know which part is to be ammended - do we?
Posts: 551 | From: FL | Registered: Apr 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by unclerudy: So why did we start a new thread? Just wondering...
Oh yah, and for those who don't know my feelings about Tut,
F him in his stupid anonymous, vague, never going to tell you anything of any worth A-hole. I hate that guy, especially now that he is talking down to us. Put out or shut up!!!
Bob asked for the new thread.
Tut? college kid in my opinion...I figger he piggy-backed on the play for his own amusement.
my 2 cents...
Not often I get to tell you that you are wrong.
I do not hang on his every word but Tut does know things...just not everything. Oh, and Yes...Tex I know factualy your assumption is wrong.
well, as posted elsewhere, I haven't seen nearly as many posts as some have...but in those I *have* read, the tone strikes me as collegiate, frat-boyish...
Anyway...so what's the "facts" ?
repost for da Portman...
Now now Tex...I am not so easily baited.
He has been on SPR more than once. Once with RPH, Sabra and MA. You can check the SPR archives...but I do not recall the date. I would truly like to share more...but I cannot.
No more for you tonight.
baited?
geez...you posted you had facts...
And you are posting an opinion of another persons post. Tut is in his 50's. You, I doubt past your 30's. But I am basing my opinion of you based on your posts as well. Kind of frat assish.
Posts: 440 | Registered: Jul 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by stocktrader22: I got it because I said GBDX was a scam
even though I have $5,000 invested in an average of .03 LOL
GBDX is a scam and yes I'm down about $800.00 in that POS too .
As for HSM , they are just a bunch of pumpers . I got banned permantly for telling the mod to go fVck off for banning me the 1st time because if CSHD and stupid a$$ tut .
-------------------- ----- Game Over ----- Posts: 1536 | From: San Antonio - Texas | Registered: Oct 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
"operations from the corresponding period for the last fiscal year will be reflected by the earnings statements"
I don't feel like going back to the 10k right now, but I don't think there was much there on the earnings statements.
Posts: 551 | From: FL | Registered: Apr 2006
| IP: Logged |
What bug me is, the site hasnt really changed since the LOI was signed back in June.
Im headed off to watch House M.D. Let me know if anyone can dissect the site. My reasoning? These guys were supposed to be holding the contract for the log deal but there doesnt seem to be much to them as a company. They seem to be fairly "new" as of May or June. Also, as TheCon and I pointed out the other day, they are sort of affiliated with Tensor information Systems (through Travis something? help me there Con) which happens to be a company Randy Mosely was once CEO of.
This could be a good one i suppose because Mike claimed to have solid contacts in Brazil for years but if thats the case then why is CEOTA such a mystery?
Im putting together a "who's who" list and will hopefully have something by this weekend. It may be too late by then but i like seeing things in black and white where i can better dissect them.
posted November 10, 2006 13:50 ________________________________________ CAT –
Since im around today for once, and sorry I didn’t notice whether or not we but our findings out there for anyone to dissect, BB, Tax…
Some things we know going way back to the beginning:
Timeline: 2001 "Gordon Brown, Director of CEOTA". – per RPH Travis TeSelle CEOTA Management Team Climate Exchange of the Americas, Inc.- Per and email sent to me. CEOTA Fort Worth, Texas
2001 Tensor Information Systems, Inc. (Tensor is headquartered in Fort Worth, Texas) Travis TeSelle CEO, and Randy Moseley served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Tensor Information Systems, Inc., a custom software development company based in Fort Worth, Texas from November 1999 - June 2001(TeSelle Still there).
"Mr. Alexander was hired by SAP to be the Americas Customer support services Webmaster for the company’s largest initiative in history, mySAP.com."
RPH stated that it was “right place right time” for CSHD to find/merge with FHAL. Many on this board have had the feeling this was in place long before that. I would rather not let this one drop. I may ask Dimension from IHub, I know; IHub, if he would give us some names involved in the BBan situation.
I’m really looking to bridge the gap between Tensor/CEOTA, to BBAN, to FHAL, to CSHD.
CAT, to you remember in on of the interviews RPH originally thought when the log deal wasn’t what it first appeared to be he thought some members of FHAL/furia might have been connected to BBAN. I lost my stomach at that comment but kind of forgot about it when everything seemed to be working out.
Many my think this is a dead end but at least Cat and I will stay with it and help would be appreciated. Like I said I would like to know if anyone can throw some other names in the mix, BBan or otherwise.
Thanks in advance CON
Posts: 140 | From: CT | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
im still with ya on this one cat. Would not be at all surprised if we end up with something major from this piece to the puzzle!!!
Posts: 140 | From: CT | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by sceptor: And you are posting an opinion of another persons post. Tut is in his 50's. You, I doubt past your 30's. But I am basing my opinion of you based on your posts as well. Kind of frat assish.
Actually I think that Tex and Tut are about the same age... AND? c'mon guys...let's cool it... Tut doesn't even post here...and the only thing that Tex was attempting to point out was that port used the "fact" statement...and Tex...being the reporter that he is...was hunting for a link...it's his way... Let's all go back to the better point of today...
We have a filing from the company...which is a postive light in these dark times... I like TAX's thought of if this doesn't go by the end of December..he will sell out...take a huge capital gains loss and buy back in after the first of the year... Always have a game plan...
-------------------- #1 Rule: Protect your capital! #2 Rule: Never fall for the BS on the boards! Posts: 8890 | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Not alot at a moment, just laughing and going!
-------------------- 'The rewards for those that persevere, far exceed the pain that must proceed the victory!' Posts: 399 | From: leeds, england | Registered: Jul 2006
| IP: Logged |
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Cool]](cool.gif)
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
![[Frown]](frown.gif)
![[Eek!]](eek.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
