posted May 27, 2004 14:01            

-chuck

quote:

---

Originally posted by realityinc21:
I DON'T HAVE TIME NOR THE INCLINATION TO ADDRESS YOU OR YOUR ISSUES. I HAVE ABSOLUTELY NOTHING TO PROVE TO YOU OR ANYONE ON THIS THREAD. I ALSO HAVE NO PROBLEMS WITH YOU AND STILL DO NOT. DO YOU THINK THIS IS THE ONLY FORUM I POST ON OR THE ONLY GROUP ON INVESTORS I REPRESENT. WRONG.

I DO NOT CARE WHAT YOU BELIEVE OR DO NOT BELIEVE. IF A PERSON DAYTRADES A STOCK IT DOES NOT HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH BELIEF IN THE SUCCESS OF THE STOCK.

BY DISPOSAL I SIMPLY MENT THAT THIS FORUM (AND OTHERS I POST ON AND OTHERS THAT I HAVE OTHER PEOPLE POSTING ON) REACHES A LOT OF PEOPLE AND THE OPINIONS FROM THESE PEOPLE AND POST HERE ARE LEGITAMENT SHAREHOLDERS WITH LEGITAMENT CONCERNS.

I WISH YOU WELL IN YOUR TRADING AND YOU HAVE A GREAT DAY. THIS IS NOT A CONTEST BECAUSE REFUSE TO ENTER.

---

posted May 27, 2004 14:10            

quote:

---

Originally posted by DragonMaster:
Fact: NO one has the advertising industry in their back pocket. Making statments like and linking them to the Q is tantamount to policital sucide. The ad industry pays the bills for most if not all broadcast stations/networks. A substantial amount of their revenue is derived from the advertising industry. If you want, really want to shoot Frank in the foot, making statments like that is the way to do it. In that industry more than any other the moniker is dog eat dog, and believe me it is cutthroat like nothing you have ever seen, and if you want the advertising you do it on their terms only, they do not negotiate in any way.

I think its great that Janie and Diana are able to go see for themselves, just please don't make broad statements like that. We all know there are lurkers that never post and only look and read with avid interest. Some of those could very well be people working for the advertising houses. Especially since we are getting noticed by the media and industry. KISS= Keep It Simple Stupid...this goes for information releases and broad statments. At this point be very careful what you say.

If you aren't careful, there might not be a launch at all...no advertisers, money gets tight quickly.

Mike

---

THOSE WERE THE EXACT WORDS THAT FRANK SAID TO ME RE: NEGOCIATING CONTRACTS. HE EXPLAINED TO ME JUST BECAUSE HE HAS THE 10 YEAR CONTRACT WITH TIME WARNER--THAT DOES NOT NESESSARY TIE UP THE TIME WARNER DEAL. THEY HAVE SUBSIDERARY COMPANIES HE ALSO HAS TO CONTRACT WITH THAT REPRESENT ADVERTISISING AGENTS THAT HAVE TO BE DEALT WITH BEFORE HE CAN GET TO THE NEXT LEVEL'S.

THAT IS ALL I KNOW. I AM NOT AN EXPERT AND KNOW NOTHING ABOUT AIRING A TV NETWORK.

I DO HAVE A LOT OF COMMON SENSE. I DO UNDERSTAND BUSINESS AND PEOPLE. I HAVE NO CRYSTAL BALL....

SO TEAR WHAT EVER YOU WANT TO TEAR UP AND HAVE FUN PICKING UPART EVERYTHING I SAY OR DO. HAVE A HAY DAY. I ALSO HAVE NO PROBLEMS WITH YOU OR YOUR POSTS. YOU HAVE A GREAT TRADING DAY.

posted May 27, 2004 14:14            

-thanks,
chuck

quote:

---

Originally posted by pharmdman:
Not to get into a p|ssing contest with anyone, but if I could just play Devil's advocate for a minute here.... chuck, weren't you the one that took boatloads of $$ from fellow QBID'ers for a trip to NO, complete with a new digital camera, and then failed to pony up when asked for the promised report? Personally, I don't really care, but I'm just wondering why someone in a glass house is flinging boulders with a trebuchet...

---

posted May 27, 2004 14:15            

quote:

---

Originally posted by pharmdman:
Not to get into a p|ssing contest with anyone, but if I could just play Devil's advocate for a minute here.... chuck, weren't you the one that took boatloads of $$ from fellow QBID'ers for a trip to NO, complete with a new digital camera, and then failed to pony up when asked for the promised report? Personally, I don't really care, but I'm just wondering why someone in a glass house is flinging boulders with a trebuchet...

---

posted May 27, 2004 14:17            

quote:

---

Originally posted by 1BigTip:
Lets see if I can be Diana for a few seconds.. QBID @ .0137 by 1:35pm

---

posted May 27, 2004 14:18            

Geeesh,
chuck

quote:

---

Originally posted by Smctbone:
lol...great point pharm! I have supported both Cash and Di for the past several months...even U4 before he was forced off the boards. Let's not start this thing with Diana as we did with Cash when he wanted support for the NO trip.

---

posted May 27, 2004 14:19            

quote:

---

Originally posted by $CashMaker$:
'Simply put by yourself'.
You do post on other boards cause we see the stuff you cut and paste here.
Also, you said, you daytrade millions of shares. Then you said you have not waivered since .0001. I am confused. Help me out here.

-chuck

---

posted May 27, 2004 14:20            

QBID CAN DO JUST THE SAME THING IN 1 DAY! UP 1000% FROM .0070 - .085..

posted May 27, 2004 14:22            

quote:

---

Originally posted by $CashMaker$:
Here is your pissing contest. I went, reported here on allstocks with a post. I have never lied here or told something that I have not done. She has. Be her daddy and protect her. If you are that dumb and blind to see what she has spoofed you on. The I will go back to the chat room that so much gets more response and results per day.

-thanks,
chuck

---

posted May 27, 2004 14:24            

you said WAIVERED. That means put at stake. geeeesh

-chuck

quote:

---

Originally posted by realityinc21:
IF A PERSON DAYTRADES A STOCK IT DOES NOT HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH BELIEF IN THE SUCCESS OF THE STOCK.

---

posted May 27, 2004 14:27            

1@.0137
2@.0136
1@.0135 <--nite
4@.0134
3@.0131

ask

posted May 27, 2004 14:29            

quote:

---

Originally posted by $CashMaker$:
This is not about her going to PS. Doofus, read what I posted. This is about what she posted and lied about.

Geeesh,
chuck

---

posted May 27, 2004 14:31            

-chuck

quote:

---

Originally posted by pharmdman:
Hopefully, you're less abrasive on there than you are on here... I'm only asking a simple question, and you can't handle that... btw, you didn't report anything substantial on here. Actually, you eluded to the fact that you had insider info that you weren't privvy to share without "legal consequenses", as if a CEO would divulge insider info to someone meandering past a display booth. Many people thought YOU were the one that was full of sh|t, if you remember. I also recall SEVERAL people asking for your "report" and your response was that you needed time to compile it. You waited SO long to compile it, that you then stated that the most recent PR negated everything you had to report to them. ... Don't piss with me, I've taken a diuretic...

---

posted May 27, 2004 14:32            

I think its always something we already knew.

Woo Hoo , they are getting smarter.

quote:

---

Originally posted by vado:
Why don't you get lost swindler..you did'nt post anything when you got back from NO..everything you posted we already knew.
I was right about you from the start.
Diana is a valued member of this board..

---

posted May 27, 2004 14:33            

quote:

---

Originally posted by $CashMaker$:
Listen, This is about her saying 'I' have never WAIVERED since .0001. But she had me believing all this time she was daytrading this stock. What is it, daytrading or not waivering?

-chuck

---

How is daytrading and making money wavering? She has NEVER wavered in her believe in Q...show me ONE post where she bashed the stock or said it wasn't going to take off? Just because she rides the dips and peaks doesn't mean that she's wavering at all

posted May 27, 2004 14:33            

quote:

---

Originally posted by $CashMaker$:
Listen, This is about her saying 'I' have never WAIVERED since .0001. But she had me believing all this time she was daytrading this stock. What is it, daytrading or not waivering?

-chuck

---

posted May 27, 2004 14:36            

quote:

---

Originally posted by $CashMaker$:
Hello,

you said WAIVERED. That means put at stake. geeeesh

-chuck

---

WE HAVE A DIFFERENCE OF OPINION. LET IT GO CASH. JUST LET IT GO. DO NOT EVER CALL ME A LIAR AGAIN.

LEST YOU REALLY ANGER ME.

I WILL NOT RESPOND TO YOU AGAIN.

HAVE A GREAT DAY.

posted May 27, 2004 14:37            

quote:

---

Originally posted by $CashMaker$:
... What is in the RUMPTIOUS PR's release.
...

---

Care to try that one in English? I don't know what "rumptious" is...

posted May 27, 2004 14:38            

quote:

---

Originally posted by 1BigTip:
Hmmmmm. Never got a report from 1, and the other told me is a millionaire but keeps posting in a forum. Hard to believe anyone.

Guess what - Buy now, I can't tell you why.

---

I don't remember seeing a report from Cash, but I don't read every post...so I can't comment on that either way...as for her being a millionaire, what's wrong with someone wealthy posting on a forum? I don't know if she IS a millionaire, nor do I care...it's her business...if she IS, more power to her...I hope that when I make my millions, I'll be good enough to keep posting...

posted May 27, 2004 14:38            

quote:

---

Originally posted by $CashMaker$:
WOO HOO someone finally caught on. Look at the PR's DOOFUS #2. What is in the RUMPTIOUS PR's release.

I think its always something we already knew.

Woo Hoo , they are getting smarter.

---

posted May 27, 2004 14:39            

quote:

---

Originally posted by $CashMaker$:
This is not about her going to PS. Doofus, read what I posted. This is about what she posted and lied about.

Geeesh,
chuck

---

posted May 27, 2004 14:39            

quote:

---

Originally posted by $CashMaker$:
WOO HOO someone finally caught on. Look at the PR's DOOFUS #2. What is in the RUMPTIOUS PR's release.

I think its always something we already knew.

Woo Hoo , they are getting smarter.

---

posted May 27, 2004 14:39            

quote:

---

Originally posted by $CashMaker$:
This is not about her going to PS. Doofus, read what I posted. This is about what she posted and lied about.

Geeesh,
chuck

---

posted May 27, 2004 14:40            

That's really cool! LOL LOL

quote:

---

Originally posted by WinsumLosesum:
OK... time for a little artistic distraction. Diana, I've grown to respect you for your intelligence, humor and tenacity. You go, girl.

Check out my tribute to Queen Diana... and chill out, people.
http://members.aol.com/inat0066/QueenDiana.jpg

---

posted May 27, 2004 14:40            

quote:

---

Originally posted by WinsumLosesum:
OK... time for a little artistic distraction. Diana, I've grown to respect you for your intelligence, humor and tenacity. You go, girl.

Check out my tribute to Queen Diana... and chill out, people.
http://members.aol.com/inat0066/QueenDiana.jpg

---

Now that's some funny @ss Shi-ite!!!!

posted May 27, 2004 14:40            

OH and BTW, I sincerely that Frank is not as fragile as you say...If he is he needs to step down and let a younger, stronger man take the reins and make it happen.

If he is not as fragile as you say then ....need i say more???

again I say, and I have seen you post it more than once...SAY WHAT YOU MEAN...AND MEAN WHAT YOU SAY. Don't paraphrase. Please Just the Facts.

Thanks

Mike

quote:

---

Originally posted by realityinc21:
THOSE WERE THE EXACT WORDS THAT FRANK SAID TO ME RE: NEGOCIATING CONTRACTS. HE EXPLAINED TO ME JUST BECAUSE HE HAS THE 10 YEAR CONTRACT WITH TIME WARNER--THAT DOES NOT NESESSARY TIE UP THE TIME WARNER DEAL. THEY HAVE SUBSIDERARY COMPANIES HE ALSO HAS TO CONTRACT WITH THAT REPRESENT ADVERTISISING AGENTS THAT HAVE TO BE DEALT WITH BEFORE HE CAN GET TO THE NEXT LEVEL'S.

THAT IS ALL I KNOW. I AM NOT AN EXPERT AND KNOW NOTHING ABOUT AIRING A TV NETWORK.

I DO HAVE A LOT OF COMMON SENSE. I DO UNDERSTAND BUSINESS AND PEOPLE. I HAVE NO CRYSTAL BALL....

SO TEAR WHAT EVER YOU WANT TO TEAR UP AND HAVE FUN PICKING UPART EVERYTHING I SAY OR DO. HAVE A HAY DAY. I ALSO HAVE NO PROBLEMS WITH YOU OR YOUR POSTS. YOU HAVE A GREAT TRADING DAY.

---

posted May 27, 2004 14:57            

OH and BTW, I sincerely that Frank is not as fragile as you say...If he is he needs to step down and let a younger, stronger man take the reins and make it happen.

If he is not as fragile as you say then ....need i say more???

again I say, and I have seen you post it more than once...SAY WHAT YOU MEAN...AND MEAN WHAT YOU SAY. Don't paraphrase. Please Just the Facts.

Thanks

Mike

quote:

---

Originally posted by realityinc21:
THOSE WERE THE EXACT WORDS THAT FRANK SAID TO ME RE: NEGOCIATING CONTRACTS. HE EXPLAINED TO ME JUST BECAUSE HE HAS THE 10 YEAR CONTRACT WITH TIME WARNER--THAT DOES NOT NESESSARY TIE UP THE TIME WARNER DEAL. THEY HAVE SUBSIDERARY COMPANIES HE ALSO HAS TO CONTRACT WITH THAT REPRESENT ADVERTISISING AGENTS THAT HAVE TO BE DEALT WITH BEFORE HE CAN GET TO THE NEXT LEVEL'S.

THAT IS ALL I KNOW. I AM NOT AN EXPERT AND KNOW NOTHING ABOUT AIRING A TV NETWORK.

I DO HAVE A LOT OF COMMON SENSE. I DO UNDERSTAND BUSINESS AND PEOPLE. I HAVE NO CRYSTAL BALL....

SO TEAR WHAT EVER YOU WANT TO TEAR UP AND HAVE FUN PICKING UPART EVERYTHING I SAY OR DO. HAVE A HAY DAY. I ALSO HAVE NO PROBLEMS WITH YOU OR YOUR POSTS. YOU HAVE A GREAT TRADING DAY.

---

posted May 27, 2004 15:00            

quote:

---

Originally posted by cyberrat67:
I don't remember seeing a report from Cash, but I don't read every post...so I can't comment on that either way...as for her being a millionaire, what's wrong with someone wealthy posting on a forum? I don't know if she IS a millionaire, nor do I care...it's her business...if she IS, more power to her...I hope that when I make my millions, I'll be good enough to keep posting...

---

posted May 27, 2004 15:05            

2@.0137
1@.0136
4@.0135
3@.0134 <--nite
1@.0132

ask

posted May 27, 2004 15:10            

quote:

---

Originally posted by jonv:
THAT'S IT!!!! I'm not going home until this thing hits 30 cents. (Does anyone have any food they can email me?)

---

posted May 27, 2004 15:10            

Mike

quote:

---

Originally posted by kbpkt:
Dragon- LOL, that nite order is me, looks like I had to chase back up, if it gets filled there

---

posted May 27, 2004 15:10            

quote:

---

Originally posted by WinsumLosesum:
OK... time for a little artistic distraction. Diana, I've grown to respect you for your intelligence, humor and tenacity. You go, girl.

Check out my tribute to Queen Diana... and chill out, people.
http://members.aol.com/inat0066/QueenDiana.jpg

---

ROFL... I appreciate everyones thoughts and opinions, but it quickly gets out of hand. I think that people get too wrapped up in the fact that we are all trying to make a living, and name calling is not helping that.

I still read every post and look forward to everyones insights and thoughts, but I still make my own decisions... if it is a good one or bad one, it's still mine! Do you understand? Trying to goad someone is not a substitute for my gains and losses because it still comes down to luck, patience and DD.

Hope everyone has good luck whether day trading or not but remember that we make our own decisions whether based on fact of fiction it's a choice. Kind of like being G or L, it's a personal decision and choice regardless of what others do or say.

posted May 27, 2004 15:13            

"LANUCH". The only smart thing ever said on this site.

I think that's the first time anyone has said 'LANUCH' but what do I know?

Couldn't help it Bart

posted May 27, 2004 15:16            

I'm about as confused as a retard at a cash register.