posted May 19, 2004 23:28            

quote:

---

Originally posted by vado:
Guys and girls look at the bands carefully ........this breakout will be huge....and the rsi is below 50......the last time the rsi was below 50 it took off from .0002 to .0036 now that was huge.......
we are poised for a massive takeoff.
The rsi is now as of this moment below 50.

---

Vado

Post the link to the charts that you're looking at. I use Medved for charting and I'm seeing semi-bearish for Thursday. RSI dipped below 50 last week too. IT was below 50 before Friday's little jump to .016. May see a litte climb out of .010 and .011 territory but I don't expect anything great just looking at the charts. Of course the charts looked outstanding for Monday and I expected a big jump and look what we got.

MACD is bullish as it was for Monday so I'm just watching and trying to figure out the market reaction. It's an overall crazy market with IRAG, Oil Prices, and the expected Rates increase.

Hard to tell but if I were placing bets based on the charts and QBIDS reaction compared to the charts, I'd say it'll be an uneventful day.

If this "Correction" we've been in since around February doesn't finish itself soon, we may be in a Bear market before we know it. JMHO.

P.S.
I really really hope you're right on the run. I bought more QBID with my wife's furniture money and we'll be moving in our new house in Aug. LOL

COME'ON QBID

posted May 20, 2004 00:24            

Saturday Nite Drag

This show would explore different clubs in
different cities. The hosts would give the
clubs ratings and so on.

Diva

This show would be like star search for cross
dressers. With the winner each week moving on
to the final round in Las Vegas. Lots of
behind the sceans stuff and drama.

Sunday Nite Classic

Movie nite with a twist, before each show
would be a biography of the stars with trivia
and what have you.

well there ya have it.

posted May 20, 2004 07:46            

quote:

---

Originally posted by StonedPigeon:
Well I have been thinking about this show
thing so here it goes:

Saturday Nite Drag

This show would explore different clubs in
different cities. The hosts would give the
clubs ratings and so on.

Diva

This show would be like star search for cross
dressers. With the winner each week moving on
to the final round in Las Vegas. Lots of
behind the sceans stuff and drama.

Sunday Nite Classic

Movie nite with a twist, before each show
would be a biography of the stars with trivia
and what have you.

well there ya have it.

---

posted May 20, 2004 08:11            

I miss Q going up. We always have much more fun and chatter. Our time WILL come.

Check this out:

111,111,111 x 111,111,111

= 12,345,678,987,654,321

Cool, eh? Grab a calculator and check it out.

posted May 20, 2004 08:33            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Booty Quest:
12,345,678,987,654,321 <=== future portfolio balance

---

Thanks, Booty. (Actually I did call it "Queers") I hope somebody's archiving this stuff (including your Gaypardy). We'll need to do something fun at the party besides comparing checkbook balances.

How about a spin-off of a classic:
I Love Brucey

posted May 20, 2004 08:45            

quote:

---

Originally posted by WinsumLosesum:
Thanks, Booty. (Actually I did call it "Queers") I hope somebody's archiving this stuff (including your Gaypardy). We'll need to do something fun at the party besides comparing checkbook balances.

How about a spin-off of a classic:
I Love Brucey

[This message has been edited by WinsumLosesum (edited May 20, 2004).]

---

Ooops, my bad, you DID call it Queers!

And, I LOOOOVE 'I love Brucey'!!!! Great idea!

posted May 20, 2004 08:46            

FIRST OF ALL THIS IS NOT DIRECTED AT ANYONE IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM. THIS IS DIRECTED AT THE CREDIBILITY AND VALIDITY OF QBID.

I AND HUNDREDS OF OTHERS HAVE BEEN BEHIND THIS COMPANY SINCE FEBRUARY 2, 2004 WHEN THE SHARE PRICE WAS @ .0001. WE NEED, WANT AND DESERVE SOME ANSWERS TO OUR QUESTIONS.

THERE IS NO WAY A HARD LAUNCH DATE CAN BE GIVEN. 1 MONTH TO 1 MONTH AND A HALF AFTER THE SOFT LAUNCH IS WHAT HAS BEEN PROJECTED. THAT PROJECTION IS GIVEN ON THE TIME FRAME OF OTHER NETWORKS LAUNCHING AFTER BEING PICKED UP BY A CABLE OR SATELLITE COMPANY.

WE CAN NOT GENERALIZE. ....SPECULATION ON FACTS IS ACCEPTABLE. WE ALL HAVE OPINIONS.

QTV HAS TO BE PICKED UP BY A CABLE OR SATELLITE COMPANY--TO LAUNCH AT ALL....THEY HAVE TO BE PICKED UP BY ADVERTISING COMPANIES. THAT IS PURPOSE OF SOFT LAUNCH AND THE ATTENDANCE AT THE NETWORK CONVENTION IN NEW ORLEANS.

TO DO SO THIS COMPANY (QTV) NEEDS TO VALIDATE SHARE PRICE, VOLUME, SEC FILINGS, INCOME STATEMENTS ETC ETC. HENCE, REASON FOR HIRING MISS LAMONT AND CONTRACTING DEVENY PR FIRM....VALIDATION--PROMOTION--CONTRACTUAL EXPERIENCE--ADVERTISING RESOURCES.. YADA YADA

IF WE AS A GROUP ( A BIG GROUP) CAN NOT STAND BEHIND THE COMPANY--IE. VALIDATE SHARE PRICE AND CORRECT INFORMATION THEN THE CHANCES FOR THEM TO LAUNCH AT ALL DECREASES DUE TO OUR INCOMPETENCE TO PUT OUT CORRECT INFORMATION. IF THEY CAN NOT GIVE US ACCURATE AND COMPETITENT INFORMATION THEN HOW CAN WE BACK UP THEIR COMPANY???

EVERYONE HERE IS THINKING. WE ARE ONLY A SMALL GROUP OF SHARE HOLDERS.. WHAT WE DO AND SAY IS A DROP IN THE BUCKET.. WRONG...I AM GETTING E-MAILS FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD IN REPLY TO E-MAILS I SENT OUT MONTHS AGO. PEOPLE LAUGHING AND SAYING "WELL THIS LOOKS FAMILIAR." BECAUSE IT STARTED RIGHT HERE.

EVERYBODY HERE REACHES OUT TO OTHERS AND OTHERS REACH OUT TO OTHERS.

SMALL STATEMENTS LIKE "I DON'T TAKE ANYTHING THEY SAY AS 100%" REFLECTS ON THE VALIDITY OF THIS COMPANY. THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE READ THIS AND REPOST SOMEWHERE ELSE. WITH AN AVERAGE OF 1/2 TO 3/4 OF A BILLION SHARES TRADED DAILY..AND SOMETIMES IN THE BILLIONS OF SHARES TRADED..SOMEONE OUT THERE IS LISTENING.

I AM NOT TRYING TO OFFEND ANYONE. JUST TRYING TO MAKE A BUCK AND KEEP IT REAL.

IF ANY ONE OF YOU THOUGHT THAT I HAVE A TEMPER AND/OR AM AGGRESSIVE WITH MY COMMENTS, YOU ARE CORRECT. THAT WAS NOTHING AND I MEAN NOTHING COMPARED TO THE E-MAIL I JUST SENT TO FRANK WITH COPY TO DEVENY FIRM. IN SHORT I KINDLY EXPLAINED TO THEM THAT IF THEY CHOOSE TO MAKE THIS WORK HE HAS TO HIRE COMPETENT EMPLOYEE'S AND TRAIN THEM WITH ADEQUATE AND ACCURATE INFORMATION TO GIVE TO THE PUBLIC. HE NEEDS TO MEET HIS DEADLINES. HE NEEDS BE PROFESSIONAL. HE NEEDS TO INFORM US OF THE O/S. HE NEEDS TO HIRE A COMPETENT ATTORNEY AND ACCOUNTANT TO FILE APPROPRIATE SEC REQUIREMENTS. HE NEEDS TO DECIDE IF DEVENY IS PUTTING OUT PRESS RELEASES OR IF HE IS. HE NEEDS TO INFORM US OF THE SHARE BUY BACK PROGRAM. HE NEEDS TO SET UP AN APPROPRIATE AND PROFESSIONAL WEB SITE. HE OBVIOUSLY HAS SOME BACKING EITHER INDEPENDENTLY, PRIVATELY OR CORPORATE AND WE NEED TO BE INFORMED AS TO WHAT STAGE OF THE GAME HE IS AT-- AND LASTLY HE NEEDS TO INFORM ME RIGHT HERE AND RIGHT NOW IF THIS IS BULLs*&T OR DOES HE HAVE ANY INTENTION OF MAKING THIS WORK BECAUSE I AM NOT GOING TO WASTE ANY MORE OF MY TIME ON THIS VENTURE IF HE IS NOT GOING TO DO WHAT HE SAYS. HE FAILED AT THIS BUSINESS VENTURE ONCE BEFORE AND THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO ROOM FOR ERROR THIS TIME AROUND.

I INFORMED HIM THAT: BEING CEO OF A COMPANY HE DOES HAVE SHARES IN THAT COMPANY THAT HE COULD SELL TO GAIN THE CAPITAL TO RETAIN THE STAFF THAT HE NEEDS. BEING CONSERVATIVELY FRUGAL IS ONE THING AND F*&*ING WITH MY TIME AND MY MONEY WAS ANOTHER. IF HE WANTS TO PLAY THE SHELL GAME--THAT IS JUST FINE WITH ME. I CAN PLAY THAT GAME RIGHT WITH THE BEST OF THEM. SO WHICH ONE IS IT FRANK? RISK OR TRIVIAL PURSUIT?

GRANTED HE HAS SET UP THE HOT LINE-- HIRED A GOOD PR. FIRM-- PUT OUT FAIRLY DECENT PRESS RELEASES--TELLING US ONLY WHAT WE ALREADY KNOW. EXECUTED THE SHOWING AT THE NETWORK CONVENTION WITH SUCCESS-- CONTRACTED WITH TIME WARNER--SET UP SOME PROGRAMMING AND ARRANGED COMPLETION OF DOCUMENTARY WITH JOE TORRES ON GAY/LESBIAN MARRIAGES--THE SOFT LAUNCH PROGRAMMING IS FINISHED AND IN FACT WAS AIRING AT THE CONVENTION ON PLASMA SCREEN TV'S--SO WHY THE TWO WEEK DELAY? WAS THAT REALLY THE SOLT LAUNCH ON THE 15TH OF MAY? SINCE NO MENTION OF SOFT LAUNCH WAS MADE IN THE HOTLINE UPDATE. ONLY THE HARD LAUNCH IN JULY.

I INFORMED HIM THAT HE HAS REALLY DONE NOTHING THAT I COULD NOT HAVE DONE IN TWO WEEKS TIME SETTING BEHIND A DESK WITH A COMPUTER AND A TELEPHONE/FAX MACHINE. IN GENERAL QTV HAS NOT MET THE SOFT LAUNCH DEADLINE WHICH IN FACT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE IN HAND. WHY IS IT NOT BEING BROADCASTED BY A DECENT NETWORK SYSTEM SO THAT THE PEOPLE HE IS TRYING TO ATTRACT WILL BE ABLE TO SEE IT? OUR CONCERN.. IS THIS PATTERN OF INCONSISTENCIES AND DEADLINE DELAYS GOING TO CONTINUE?

I DO UNDERSTAND THAT IT HAD BEEN QUITE HECTIC. I INFORMED HIM THAT "FRANK, THAT IS YOUR JOB TO CONTROL UPRISING SITUATIONS AS CEO OF QTV. NO ONE SAID IT WOULD BE EASY."
I DID NOT E-MAIL YOU FOR EXCUSES I E-MAILED YOU FOR ANSWERS." I DO EXPECT A PROMPT RESPONSE. ONE FROM YOURSELF AND ONE FROM DEVENY PR FIRM.

I FEEL LIKE FRANK IS IN OVER HIS HEAD. SETTING UP THE SATELLITE FOR SOFT LAUNCH TESTING HAD TAKEN LONGER THAN HE EXPECTED. NOT JUST EVERYONE IS WILLING TO CONTRACT WITH GAY/LESBIAN TV NETWORK. HE SHOULD HAVE HIRED MORE STAFF MONTHS AGO. HE SHOULD HAVE HAD MISS LAMONT ON BOARD MONTHS AGO. HE SHOULD HAVE HIRED A PR. FIRM MONTHS AGO. HE SHOULD HAVE MADE SURE HE HAD SATELLITE SYSTEMS SET UP BEFORE HE SET A DATE FOR LAUNCH. IN SHORT, IF HE DOES NOT KNOW WHAT HE IS DOING THEN HE NEEDS TO HIRE ADEQUATE STAFF THAT DOES. I KNOW THAT FRANK WANTS TO LAUNCH QTV. HE HAS THE CONCEPTUAL IDEA'S FORMED BUT IS HE UNDER MANNED AND UNDER STAFFED AT THIS TIME TO MAKE THIS A REALITY. BASICALLY, I POINTED OUR THAT THE BALL STARTED ROLLING AND HE IS UNABLE TO KEEP UP. SINCE HIRING EXTRA STAFF RECENTLY THINGS HAVE BEEN BETTER BUT TOTALLY INSANE AS FAR AS THE WORK LOAD. COMMON SENSE TELLS ME THIS. HIRING THE PR. FIRM SHOULD LIGHTEN THAT LOAD. FRANK GENUINELY SEEMS INTENT ON MAKING THIS WORK. MY CONCERN IS CAN HE?

IMHO--IT CAN BE VERY OVERWHELMING THE IMMENSITY OF THE PROJECT HE HAS UNDERTAKEN. FRANK DOES NOT SEEM TO HAVE THE SELF ESTEEM NOR THE COMPETENCY THAT A PERSON I WOULD EXPECT AS A CEO OF A TV NETWORK. IN SHORT, FRANK IS DEFINITELY NO TED TURNER. FRANK SEEMS TO FRAGILE AND CONCERNED OVER TRIVIAL MATTERS. IF HE CAN'T GET QTV LAUNCHED THERE ARE SEVERAL COMPANIES COMING RIGHT BEHIND HIM THAT WILL. VIACOM BEING AT THE HEAD OF THE LIST.

WELL THERE IT IS FOLKS..I LAID DOWN THE FACTS. WE WILL WAIT FOR THE RETURN E-MAIL OR CALL.

posted May 20, 2004 09:01            

quote:

---

Originally posted by pharmdman:
morning all! any predictions on the rollercoaster ride today?

---

Hey, nut cruncher! You know what I think is gonna happen. Unless they PR us real quick-like.

posted May 20, 2004 09:02            

FYI

posted May 20, 2004 09:03            

In the past 6 months, QBID is in a trading range with an average daily volume of 507.13 million shares. It is a liquid penny stock, suitable for frequent trading. Recently it was going up.
http://www.tradetrek.com/NN/default.asp?symbol=QBID

ht tp://quotes.barchart.com/quote.asp?sym=QBID&code=BSTK
http://quote s.barchart.com/texpert.asp?sym=QBID
http://charts3.barchart.com/pr ocal.asp?sym=QBID
http://www2.barchart.com/news.asp?sym=QBID

posted May 20, 2004 09:05            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Bob Frey:
Diana,

FYI

The pages on this board will be viewed about one million times this week.

---

posted May 20, 2004 09:10            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Booty Quest:
Hey, nut cruncher! You know what I think is gonna happen. Unless they PR us real quick-like.

Diana, wow. Strong stuff. I hope you perk them up a little.

---

posted May 20, 2004 09:16            

quote:

---

Originally posted by pharmdman:
LOL.. how'd you know my nickname?! ... I still can't believe you're Q-less! too frightening for me to imagine...

---

I know! I feel so naked to be without ANY Q! I kept having dreams last night that I bought in at 008. But my order is for 007 and lower right now. I really have no clue if it'll go that low. It's just a desire to get to 2 million shares and that's where it needs to drop for me to get there.

posted May 20, 2004 09:22            

bid

2@.0108 <--NITE
2@.0107
2@.0106
3@.0102
1@.0101

ask

posted May 20, 2004 09:24            

Thank You.

posted May 20, 2004 09:27              

quote:

---

Originally posted by realityinc21:
TO KENDRA AND DEVENY STAFF:
TO TRIANGLE MULTI MEDIA:
TO THE INVESTORS IN THIS STOCK HOLDING MILLIONS OF SHARES WORTH MILLIONS OF DOLLARS:

FIRST OF ALL THIS IS NOT DIRECTED AT ANYONE IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM. THIS IS DIRECTED AT THE CREDIBILITY AND VALIDITY OF QBID.

I AND HUNDREDS OF OTHERS HAVE BEEN BEHIND THIS COMPANY SINCE FEBRUARY 2, 2004 WHEN THE SHARE PRICE WAS @ .0001. WE NEED, WANT AND DESERVE SOME ANSWERS TO OUR QUESTIONS.

THERE IS NO WAY A HARD LAUNCH DATE CAN BE GIVEN. 1 MONTH TO 1 MONTH AND A HALF AFTER THE SOFT LAUNCH IS WHAT HAS BEEN PROJECTED. THAT PROJECTION IS GIVEN ON THE TIME FRAME OF OTHER NETWORKS LAUNCHING AFTER BEING PICKED UP BY A CABLE OR SATELLITE COMPANY.

WE CAN NOT GENERALIZE. ....SPECULATION ON FACTS IS ACCEPTABLE. WE ALL HAVE OPINIONS.

QTV HAS TO BE PICKED UP BY A CABLE OR SATELLITE COMPANY--TO LAUNCH AT ALL....THEY HAVE TO BE PICKED UP BY ADVERTISING COMPANIES. THAT IS PURPOSE OF SOFT LAUNCH AND THE ATTENDANCE AT THE NETWORK CONVENTION IN NEW ORLEANS.

TO DO SO THIS COMPANY (QTV) NEEDS TO VALIDATE SHARE PRICE, VOLUME, SEC FILINGS, INCOME STATEMENTS ETC ETC. HENCE, REASON FOR HIRING MISS LAMONT AND CONTRACTING DEVENY PR FIRM....VALIDATION--PROMOTION--CONTRACTUAL EXPERIENCE--ADVERTISING RESOURCES.. YADA YADA

IF WE AS A GROUP ( A BIG GROUP) CAN NOT STAND BEHIND THE COMPANY--IE. VALIDATE SHARE PRICE AND CORRECT INFORMATION THEN THE CHANCES FOR THEM TO LAUNCH AT ALL DECREASES DUE TO OUR INCOMPETENCE TO PUT OUT CORRECT INFORMATION. IF THEY CAN NOT GIVE US ACCURATE AND COMPETITENT INFORMATION THEN HOW CAN WE BACK UP THEIR COMPANY???

EVERYONE HERE IS THINKING. WE ARE ONLY A SMALL GROUP OF SHARE HOLDERS.. WHAT WE DO AND SAY IS A DROP IN THE BUCKET.. WRONG...I AM GETTING E-MAILS FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD IN REPLY TO E-MAILS I SENT OUT MONTHS AGO. PEOPLE LAUGHING AND SAYING "WELL THIS LOOKS FAMILIAR." BECAUSE IT STARTED RIGHT HERE.

EVERYBODY HERE REACHES OUT TO OTHERS AND OTHERS REACH OUT TO OTHERS.

SMALL STATEMENTS LIKE "I DON'T TAKE ANYTHING THEY SAY AS 100%" REFLECTS ON THE VALIDITY OF THIS COMPANY. THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE READ THIS AND REPOST SOMEWHERE ELSE. WITH AN AVERAGE OF 1/2 TO 3/4 OF A BILLION SHARES TRADED DAILY..AND SOMETIMES IN THE BILLIONS OF SHARES TRADED..SOMEONE OUT THERE IS LISTENING.

I AM NOT TRYING TO OFFEND ANYONE. JUST TRYING TO MAKE A BUCK AND KEEP IT REAL.

IF ANY ONE OF YOU THOUGHT THAT I HAVE A TEMPER AND/OR AM AGGRESSIVE WITH MY COMMENTS, YOU ARE CORRECT. THAT WAS NOTHING AND I MEAN NOTHING COMPARED TO THE E-MAIL I JUST SENT TO FRANK WITH COPY TO DEVENY FIRM. IN SHORT I KINDLY EXPLAINED TO THEM THAT IF THEY CHOOSE TO MAKE THIS WORK HE HAS TO HIRE COMPETENT EMPLOYEE'S AND TRAIN THEM WITH ADEQUATE AND ACCURATE INFORMATION TO GIVE TO THE PUBLIC. HE NEEDS TO MEET HIS DEADLINES. HE NEEDS BE PROFESSIONAL. HE NEEDS TO INFORM US OF THE O/S. HE NEEDS TO HIRE A COMPETENT ATTORNEY AND ACCOUNTANT TO FILE APPROPRIATE SEC REQUIREMENTS. HE NEEDS TO DECIDE IF DEVENY IS PUTTING OUT PRESS RELEASES OR IF HE IS. HE NEEDS TO INFORM US OF THE SHARE BUY BACK PROGRAM. HE NEEDS TO SET UP AN APPROPRIATE AND PROFESSIONAL WEB SITE. HE OBVIOUSLY HAS SOME BACKING EITHER INDEPENDENTLY, PRIVATELY OR CORPORATE AND WE NEED TO BE INFORMED AS TO WHAT STAGE OF THE GAME HE IS AT-- AND LASTLY HE NEEDS TO INFORM ME RIGHT HERE AND RIGHT NOW IF THIS IS BULLs*&T OR DOES HE HAVE ANY INTENTION OF MAKING THIS WORK BECAUSE I AM NOT GOING TO WASTE ANY MORE OF MY TIME ON THIS VENTURE IF HE IS NOT GOING TO DO WHAT HE SAYS. HE FAILED AT THIS BUSINESS VENTURE ONCE BEFORE AND THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO ROOM FOR ERROR THIS TIME AROUND.

I INFORMED HIM THAT: BEING CEO OF A COMPANY HE DOES HAVE SHARES IN THAT COMPANY THAT HE COULD SELL TO GAIN THE CAPITAL TO RETAIN THE STAFF THAT HE NEEDS. BEING CONSERVATIVELY FRUGAL IS ONE THING AND F*&*ING WITH MY TIME AND MY MONEY WAS ANOTHER. IF HE WANTS TO PLAY THE SHELL GAME--THAT IS JUST FINE WITH ME. I CAN PLAY THAT GAME RIGHT WITH THE BEST OF THEM. SO WHICH ONE IS IT FRANK? RISK OR TRIVIAL PURSUIT?

GRANTED HE HAS SET UP THE HOT LINE-- HIRED A GOOD PR. FIRM-- PUT OUT FAIRLY DECENT PRESS RELEASES--TELLING US ONLY WHAT WE ALREADY KNOW. EXECUTED THE SHOWING AT THE NETWORK CONVENTION WITH SUCCESS-- CONTRACTED WITH TIME WARNER--SET UP SOME PROGRAMMING AND ARRANGED COMPLETION OF DOCUMENTARY WITH JOE TORRES ON GAY/LESBIAN MARRIAGES--THE SOFT LAUNCH PROGRAMMING IS FINISHED AND IN FACT WAS AIRING AT THE CONVENTION ON PLASMA SCREEN TV'S--SO WHY THE TWO WEEK DELAY? WAS THAT REALLY THE SOLT LAUNCH ON THE 15TH OF MAY? SINCE NO MENTION OF SOFT LAUNCH WAS MADE IN THE HOTLINE UPDATE. ONLY THE HARD LAUNCH IN JULY.

I INFORMED HIM THAT HE HAS REALLY DONE NOTHING THAT I COULD NOT HAVE DONE IN TWO WEEKS TIME SETTING BEHIND A DESK WITH A COMPUTER AND A TELEPHONE/FAX MACHINE. IN GENERAL QTV HAS NOT MET THE SOFT LAUNCH DEADLINE WHICH IN FACT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE IN HAND. WHY IS IT NOT BEING BROADCASTED BY A DECENT NETWORK SYSTEM SO THAT THE PEOPLE HE IS TRYING TO ATTRACT WILL BE ABLE TO SEE IT? OUR CONCERN.. IS THIS PATTERN OF INCONSISTENCIES AND DEADLINE DELAYS GOING TO CONTINUE?

I DO UNDERSTAND THAT IT HAD BEEN QUITE HECTIC. I INFORMED HIM THAT "FRANK, THAT IS YOUR JOB TO CONTROL UPRISING SITUATIONS AS CEO OF QTV. NO ONE SAID IT WOULD BE EASY."
I DID NOT E-MAIL YOU FOR EXCUSES I E-MAILED YOU FOR ANSWERS." I DO EXPECT A PROMPT RESPONSE. ONE FROM YOURSELF AND ONE FROM DEVENY PR FIRM.

I FEEL LIKE FRANK IS IN OVER HIS HEAD. SETTING UP THE SATELLITE FOR SOFT LAUNCH TESTING HAD TAKEN LONGER THAN HE EXPECTED. NOT JUST EVERYONE IS WILLING TO CONTRACT WITH GAY/LESBIAN TV NETWORK. HE SHOULD HAVE HIRED MORE STAFF MONTHS AGO. HE SHOULD HAVE HAD MISS LAMONT ON BOARD MONTHS AGO. HE SHOULD HAVE HIRED A PR. FIRM MONTHS AGO. HE SHOULD HAVE MADE SURE HE HAD SATELLITE SYSTEMS SET UP BEFORE HE SET A DATE FOR LAUNCH. IN SHORT, IF HE DOES NOT KNOW WHAT HE IS DOING THEN HE NEEDS TO HIRE ADEQUATE STAFF THAT DOES. I KNOW THAT FRANK WANTS TO LAUNCH QTV. HE HAS THE CONCEPTUAL IDEA'S FORMED BUT IS HE UNDER MANNED AND UNDER STAFFED AT THIS TIME TO MAKE THIS A REALITY. BASICALLY, I POINTED OUR THAT THE BALL STARTED ROLLING AND HE IS UNABLE TO KEEP UP. SINCE HIRING EXTRA STAFF RECENTLY THINGS HAVE BEEN BETTER BUT TOTALLY INSANE AS FAR AS THE WORK LOAD. COMMON SENSE TELLS ME THIS. HIRING THE PR. FIRM SHOULD LIGHTEN THAT LOAD. FRANK GENUINELY SEEMS INTENT ON MAKING THIS WORK. MY CONCERN IS CAN HE?

IMHO--IT CAN BE VERY OVERWHELMING THE IMMENSITY OF THE PROJECT HE HAS UNDERTAKEN. FRANK DOES NOT SEEM TO HAVE THE SELF ESTEEM NOR THE COMPETENCY THAT A PERSON I WOULD EXPECT AS A CEO OF A TV NETWORK. IN SHORT, FRANK IS DEFINITELY NO TED TURNER. FRANK SEEMS TO FRAGILE AND CONCERNED OVER TRIVIAL MATTERS. IF HE CAN'T GET QTV LAUNCHED THERE ARE SEVERAL COMPANIES COMING RIGHT BEHIND HIM THAT WILL. VIACOM BEING AT THE HEAD OF THE LIST.

WELL THERE IT IS FOLKS..I LAID DOWN THE FACTS. WE WILL WAIT FOR THE RETURN E-MAIL OR CALL.

---

posted May 20, 2004 09:30            

P.S - I'm the typical greedy rich person who makes a million, shuts down his computer, goes to a deserted island and wants nothing to do with anyone/anything!

posted May 20, 2004 09:31            

1@.0109 <--NITE
1@.0108
4@.0107
1@.0106
2@.0102

ask

posted May 20, 2004 09:33              

quote:

---

Originally posted by realityinc21:
TO KENDRA AND DEVENY STAFF:
TO TRIANGLE MULTI MEDIA:
TO THE INVESTORS IN THIS STOCK HOLDING MILLIONS OF SHARES WORTH MILLIONS OF DOLLARS:

FIRST OF ALL THIS IS NOT DIRECTED AT ANYONE IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM. THIS IS DIRECTED AT THE CREDIBILITY AND VALIDITY OF QBID.

I AND HUNDREDS OF OTHERS HAVE BEEN BEHIND THIS COMPANY SINCE FEBRUARY 2, 2004 WHEN THE SHARE PRICE WAS @ .0001. WE NEED, WANT AND DESERVE SOME ANSWERS TO OUR QUESTIONS.

THERE IS NO WAY A HARD LAUNCH DATE CAN BE GIVEN. 1 MONTH TO 1 MONTH AND A HALF AFTER THE SOFT LAUNCH IS WHAT HAS BEEN PROJECTED. THAT PROJECTION IS GIVEN ON THE TIME FRAME OF OTHER NETWORKS LAUNCHING AFTER BEING PICKED UP BY A CABLE OR SATELLITE COMPANY.

WE CAN NOT GENERALIZE. ....SPECULATION ON FACTS IS ACCEPTABLE. WE ALL HAVE OPINIONS.

QTV HAS TO BE PICKED UP BY A CABLE OR SATELLITE COMPANY--TO LAUNCH AT ALL....THEY HAVE TO BE PICKED UP BY ADVERTISING COMPANIES. THAT IS PURPOSE OF SOFT LAUNCH AND THE ATTENDANCE AT THE NETWORK CONVENTION IN NEW ORLEANS.

TO DO SO THIS COMPANY (QTV) NEEDS TO VALIDATE SHARE PRICE, VOLUME, SEC FILINGS, INCOME STATEMENTS ETC ETC. HENCE, REASON FOR HIRING MISS LAMONT AND CONTRACTING DEVENY PR FIRM....VALIDATION--PROMOTION--CONTRACTUAL EXPERIENCE--ADVERTISING RESOURCES.. YADA YADA

IF WE AS A GROUP ( A BIG GROUP) CAN NOT STAND BEHIND THE COMPANY--IE. VALIDATE SHARE PRICE AND CORRECT INFORMATION THEN THE CHANCES FOR THEM TO LAUNCH AT ALL DECREASES DUE TO OUR INCOMPETENCE TO PUT OUT CORRECT INFORMATION. IF THEY CAN NOT GIVE US ACCURATE AND COMPETITENT INFORMATION THEN HOW CAN WE BACK UP THEIR COMPANY???

EVERYONE HERE IS THINKING. WE ARE ONLY A SMALL GROUP OF SHARE HOLDERS.. WHAT WE DO AND SAY IS A DROP IN THE BUCKET.. WRONG...I AM GETTING E-MAILS FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD IN REPLY TO E-MAILS I SENT OUT MONTHS AGO. PEOPLE LAUGHING AND SAYING "WELL THIS LOOKS FAMILIAR." BECAUSE IT STARTED RIGHT HERE.

EVERYBODY HERE REACHES OUT TO OTHERS AND OTHERS REACH OUT TO OTHERS.

SMALL STATEMENTS LIKE "I DON'T TAKE ANYTHING THEY SAY AS 100%" REFLECTS ON THE VALIDITY OF THIS COMPANY. THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE READ THIS AND REPOST SOMEWHERE ELSE. WITH AN AVERAGE OF 1/2 TO 3/4 OF A BILLION SHARES TRADED DAILY..AND SOMETIMES IN THE BILLIONS OF SHARES TRADED..SOMEONE OUT THERE IS LISTENING.

I AM NOT TRYING TO OFFEND ANYONE. JUST TRYING TO MAKE A BUCK AND KEEP IT REAL.

IF ANY ONE OF YOU THOUGHT THAT I HAVE A TEMPER AND/OR AM AGGRESSIVE WITH MY COMMENTS, YOU ARE CORRECT. THAT WAS NOTHING AND I MEAN NOTHING COMPARED TO THE E-MAIL I JUST SENT TO FRANK WITH COPY TO DEVENY FIRM. IN SHORT I KINDLY EXPLAINED TO THEM THAT IF THEY CHOOSE TO MAKE THIS WORK HE HAS TO HIRE COMPETENT EMPLOYEE'S AND TRAIN THEM WITH ADEQUATE AND ACCURATE INFORMATION TO GIVE TO THE PUBLIC. HE NEEDS TO MEET HIS DEADLINES. HE NEEDS BE PROFESSIONAL. HE NEEDS TO INFORM US OF THE O/S. HE NEEDS TO HIRE A COMPETENT ATTORNEY AND ACCOUNTANT TO FILE APPROPRIATE SEC REQUIREMENTS. HE NEEDS TO DECIDE IF DEVENY IS PUTTING OUT PRESS RELEASES OR IF HE IS. HE NEEDS TO INFORM US OF THE SHARE BUY BACK PROGRAM. HE NEEDS TO SET UP AN APPROPRIATE AND PROFESSIONAL WEB SITE. HE OBVIOUSLY HAS SOME BACKING EITHER INDEPENDENTLY, PRIVATELY OR CORPORATE AND WE NEED TO BE INFORMED AS TO WHAT STAGE OF THE GAME HE IS AT-- AND LASTLY HE NEEDS TO INFORM ME RIGHT HERE AND RIGHT NOW IF THIS IS BULLs*&T OR DOES HE HAVE ANY INTENTION OF MAKING THIS WORK BECAUSE I AM NOT GOING TO WASTE ANY MORE OF MY TIME ON THIS VENTURE IF HE IS NOT GOING TO DO WHAT HE SAYS. HE FAILED AT THIS BUSINESS VENTURE ONCE BEFORE AND THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO ROOM FOR ERROR THIS TIME AROUND.

I INFORMED HIM THAT: BEING CEO OF A COMPANY HE DOES HAVE SHARES IN THAT COMPANY THAT HE COULD SELL TO GAIN THE CAPITAL TO RETAIN THE STAFF THAT HE NEEDS. BEING CONSERVATIVELY FRUGAL IS ONE THING AND F*&*ING WITH MY TIME AND MY MONEY WAS ANOTHER. IF HE WANTS TO PLAY THE SHELL GAME--THAT IS JUST FINE WITH ME. I CAN PLAY THAT GAME RIGHT WITH THE BEST OF THEM. SO WHICH ONE IS IT FRANK? RISK OR TRIVIAL PURSUIT?

GRANTED HE HAS SET UP THE HOT LINE-- HIRED A GOOD PR. FIRM-- PUT OUT FAIRLY DECENT PRESS RELEASES--TELLING US ONLY WHAT WE ALREADY KNOW. EXECUTED THE SHOWING AT THE NETWORK CONVENTION WITH SUCCESS-- CONTRACTED WITH TIME WARNER--SET UP SOME PROGRAMMING AND ARRANGED COMPLETION OF DOCUMENTARY WITH JOE TORRES ON GAY/LESBIAN MARRIAGES--THE SOFT LAUNCH PROGRAMMING IS FINISHED AND IN FACT WAS AIRING AT THE CONVENTION ON PLASMA SCREEN TV'S--SO WHY THE TWO WEEK DELAY? WAS THAT REALLY THE SOLT LAUNCH ON THE 15TH OF MAY? SINCE NO MENTION OF SOFT LAUNCH WAS MADE IN THE HOTLINE UPDATE. ONLY THE HARD LAUNCH IN JULY.

I INFORMED HIM THAT HE HAS REALLY DONE NOTHING THAT I COULD NOT HAVE DONE IN TWO WEEKS TIME SETTING BEHIND A DESK WITH A COMPUTER AND A TELEPHONE/FAX MACHINE. IN GENERAL QTV HAS NOT MET THE SOFT LAUNCH DEADLINE WHICH IN FACT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE IN HAND. WHY IS IT NOT BEING BROADCASTED BY A DECENT NETWORK SYSTEM SO THAT THE PEOPLE HE IS TRYING TO ATTRACT WILL BE ABLE TO SEE IT? OUR CONCERN.. IS THIS PATTERN OF INCONSISTENCIES AND DEADLINE DELAYS GOING TO CONTINUE?

I DO UNDERSTAND THAT IT HAD BEEN QUITE HECTIC. I INFORMED HIM THAT "FRANK, THAT IS YOUR JOB TO CONTROL UPRISING SITUATIONS AS CEO OF QTV. NO ONE SAID IT WOULD BE EASY."
I DID NOT E-MAIL YOU FOR EXCUSES I E-MAILED YOU FOR ANSWERS." I DO EXPECT A PROMPT RESPONSE. ONE FROM YOURSELF AND ONE FROM DEVENY PR FIRM.

I FEEL LIKE FRANK IS IN OVER HIS HEAD. SETTING UP THE SATELLITE FOR SOFT LAUNCH TESTING HAD TAKEN LONGER THAN HE EXPECTED. NOT JUST EVERYONE IS WILLING TO CONTRACT WITH GAY/LESBIAN TV NETWORK. HE SHOULD HAVE HIRED MORE STAFF MONTHS AGO. HE SHOULD HAVE HAD MISS LAMONT ON BOARD MONTHS AGO. HE SHOULD HAVE HIRED A PR. FIRM MONTHS AGO. HE SHOULD HAVE MADE SURE HE HAD SATELLITE SYSTEMS SET UP BEFORE HE SET A DATE FOR LAUNCH. IN SHORT, IF HE DOES NOT KNOW WHAT HE IS DOING THEN HE NEEDS TO HIRE ADEQUATE STAFF THAT DOES. I KNOW THAT FRANK WANTS TO LAUNCH QTV. HE HAS THE CONCEPTUAL IDEA'S FORMED BUT IS HE UNDER MANNED AND UNDER STAFFED AT THIS TIME TO MAKE THIS A REALITY. BASICALLY, I POINTED OUR THAT THE BALL STARTED ROLLING AND HE IS UNABLE TO KEEP UP. SINCE HIRING EXTRA STAFF RECENTLY THINGS HAVE BEEN BETTER BUT TOTALLY INSANE AS FAR AS THE WORK LOAD. COMMON SENSE TELLS ME THIS. HIRING THE PR. FIRM SHOULD LIGHTEN THAT LOAD. FRANK GENUINELY SEEMS INTENT ON MAKING THIS WORK. MY CONCERN IS CAN HE?

IMHO--IT CAN BE VERY OVERWHELMING THE IMMENSITY OF THE PROJECT HE HAS UNDERTAKEN. FRANK DOES NOT SEEM TO HAVE THE SELF ESTEEM NOR THE COMPETENCY THAT A PERSON I WOULD EXPECT AS A CEO OF A TV NETWORK. IN SHORT, FRANK IS DEFINITELY NO TED TURNER. FRANK SEEMS TO FRAGILE AND CONCERNED OVER TRIVIAL MATTERS. IF HE CAN'T GET QTV LAUNCHED THERE ARE SEVERAL COMPANIES COMING RIGHT BEHIND HIM THAT WILL. VIACOM BEING AT THE HEAD OF THE LIST.

WELL THERE IT IS FOLKS..I LAID DOWN THE FACTS. WE WILL WAIT FOR THE RETURN E-MAIL OR CALL.

Where are you coming from? Hindsight is easy to come by. Your saying if the dog wouldn't have stopped to take a **** he would have caught the rabbit. What do you know about running a network? Have you run one before? You are making alot of demands for someone who only has a few million shares. You and I are but a drop in the bucket. Get off your high horse and come down to earth. Causing an uproar isn't going to change anything and it most certainly won't get any of your concerns answered any quicker. Stock market is a gamble and you know it. Sometimes you win sometimes you lose. So take it easy and simmer down.

---

posted May 20, 2004 09:35            

1@.0108
4@.0107 <---NITE
2@.0106
2@.0102
1@.0101

ask

posted May 20, 2004 09:42            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Bob_dog:
And in this Corner.......
remember I want a fair fight
no hair pulling or b|tch slapping

---

posted May 20, 2004 09:43            

1@.0105
3@.0104 <---NITE
4@.0102
4@.01
1@.0099

ask

posted May 20, 2004 09:44            

I AM NOT UPSET. I WANT SIMPLE ANSWERS TO SIMPLE QUESTIONS.

IN MY E-MAIL TO FRANK I WAS NOT AS BLUNT AS I WAS HERE ON THIS THREAD.

I SIMPLY WANTED TO CONVEY TO YOU THAT WE DESERVE SOME ANSWERS AND ALSO THAT POSTING OUR CONCERNS ON THIS THREAD IS WORTHLESS UNLESS WE GET OUR CONCERNS TO THE APPROPRIATE PEOPLE.

I DID NOT TELL FRANK THAT HE IS NO TED TURNER. I ALSO DID NOT USE THE F*&KING. LOL

I ALSO USED SPELL CHECK AND THE APPROPRIATE LETTER FORMATION. LOL

I HAVE STARTED MANY, MANY BUSINESSES. CURRENTLY OWN AND OPERATE A NON PROFIT BUSINESS REALITY INC. I FEEL LIKE I CAN RUN ANY BUSINESS. ONE IS NO DIFFFERENT THAT THE OTHER. JUST DIFFERENCE SYMANTICS.

BETTER WATCH OMOG PTSO IVOC TWTN EFLT (FOR A BOTTOM BOUNCE)

------------------
DIANA

posted May 20, 2004 09:53            

I don't quite know how to say this without risking offense so I'll say from the start that none is intened. But I think many of you are day traders and are not as used to the strategy of holding a stock for a period longer than a few weeks at most. I think people are getting upset becasue things are not happening fast enough for them. Sure, I'd like a few answers (such as O/S shares) and some SEC filings but I knew when I bought this stock the O/S was a fuzy number and that they did not file with the SEC. I can't see getting upset now because things haven't changed.

Maybe I'm just being dense but I'm not sure why some many are so upset about all this. I'd suggest those who are go back and read Diana's list of reasons to own QBID posted elsewhere on this board. They all still apply.

Well, I guess I've had my say for now so I'll just crawl back into my swamp. Flame away. I won't take offense.

posted May 20, 2004 09:57            

quote:

---

Originally posted by ludinlo:
Anybody have a suggestion on lower commission prices. I'm in Canada and have to pay 29.00 usd to buy and 29.00 usd to sell?

Help

---

posted May 20, 2004 09:58              

quote:

---

Originally posted by ludinlo:
Anybody have a suggestion on lower commission prices. I'm in Canada and have to pay 29.00 usd to buy and 29.00 usd to sell?

Help

---

posted May 20, 2004 09:59            

5@.0105
1@.0104
1@.0103
1@.0102
1@.01

ask

posted May 20, 2004 10:00            

quote:

---

Originally posted by GatorMan:
I'm usually a big supproter of Diana and this is not meant to be an attack on her, but I'm not sure I understand the big deal and the need for her communication to Frank, et al. I don't think we have ALL the facts, nor should we. NO public company keeps investors fully informed of every little thing going on. This is still a small, inexperienced company that is learning as it goes. They are going to make mistakes, miss deadlines, change plans on the fly as they learn. They ARE making progress. They now have a PR firm hired, and a nationaly recognized one at that. They have demonstrated that they can put up a signal that can reach the target market. And it sounds like they are in the process of firming up contracts with cable companies to carry that signal. I am still VERY hyped about this company. I'm not expecting a $1 share price tomorrow, or even by years end. This is a company that needs to be allowed to grow and mature.

I don't quite know how to say this without risking offense so I'll say from the start that none is intened. But I think many of you are day traders and are not as used to the strategy of holding a stock for a period longer than a few weeks at most. I think people are getting upset becasue things are not happening fast enough for them. Sure, I'd like a few answers (such as O/S shares) and some SEC filings but I knew when I bought this stock the O/S was a fuzy number and that they did not file with the SEC. I can't see getting upset now because things haven't changed.

Maybe I'm just being dense but I'm not sure why some many are so upset about all this. I'd suggest those who are go back and read Diana's list of reasons to own QBID posted elsewhere on this board. They all still apply.

Well, I guess I've had my say for now so I'll just crawl back into my swamp. Flame away. I won't take offense.

---

I AM ALSO 100% BEHIND THIS COMPANY. AS A SHAREHOLDER I BELIEVE WE SHOULD BE KEPT UP TO DATE. AS I JUST STATED THE LETTER KINDLY ADDRESSED THESE ISSUES.

I WOULD HAVE POSTED THE ACTUAL E-MAIL BUT I HAD INCLUDED PERSONAL INFORMATION THAT I DID NOT WANT INCLUDED TO THE MILLIONS OF VIEWERS HERE. LOL

I APPRECIATE AND UNDERSTAND YOUR CONCERNS. NO HARM NO FOWL. LOL

posted May 20, 2004 10:10            

quote:

---

Originally posted by sonnydbar:
qbid is sleeping, DRDF is not

---

WATCH ONEV FOR THE BOTTOM PLAY

posted May 20, 2004 10:15            

1@.0105
2@.0104
3@.0102
1@.0101
2@.01

ask

posted May 20, 2004 10:16            

Thanks.

Diana - Ultimate professional in your letter to Frank I'm sure. I agree, it's time this company take all the actions necessary to make this a hit. If stockholders don't take them seriously, neither will the broadcasters. We need some confirming info on some of the areas you stated to get this thing moving.

GLTA

Pray for our Troops!!!!!!

posted May 20, 2004 10:18            

quote:

---

Originally posted by realityinc21:
WATCH ONEV FOR THE BOTTOM PLAY

---