posted
*** was based in Dallas? I didn't know that, wasn't a certain MA and the rest of the texas crew based in dallas? Things that make you go hmmmm....lol
Posts: 854 | From: Alpharetta, GA | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
There has been alot of funny stuff and all of it has been addressed in a big way this time around!!!
It is now offensive filings!!!
Food for thought, How can a clerk enter a Default when I answered the allegations on the first day of court and even presented a lot of evidence called exhibits all accepted by the court!!!!
Things that make you go Hmmmmmmmm!!!!
« Today at 2:07am by Rufus Paul Harris »
Posts: 65 | Registered: Dec 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
According to court transcripts, this is the evidence submitted to court Oct 25 ,2006 by Mr. Harris:
- Global funding agreement with Carracas group $500M with an annex to extend that value to $5B. - Euroclear security codes to show transfer of above bonds into CSHD account. - All the CSHD account codes for Euroclear and Bloombergs required to access the $500M bonds. - declaration from Banco Centra de Venezuela affirming validity of bond. - certificate of ownership stamped and signed by Banco de Venezuela. - letter from ambassador to UNESCO, stating that Bernard Kuepper has been hired to hand bond transactions into CSHD accounts via Dexia bank.
I find it interesting that NOT ONE of the parties mentioned above have come forward and made a public statement, or for that matter provided ANY info too SEC, too the effect that they have nothing to do with CSHD and RPH. Perhaps its all true! I believe it is. If it were not, this would have died a long time ago ----------------------------------------------
Friday, December 14, 2007 « Today at 2:23am »
How did those get there in the courts documents as exhibits if not presented with a answer???
Got to love the game!!! Man I am ready for this!!!
I would like to thank everyone for hanging in there, this has been a bumpy road but we will all see it through to the end!!!
GODSPEED and GODBLESS
Prayers are out to everyone that is having financial problems and May Gods will be done in your lives!!!
Posts: 65 | Registered: Dec 2007
| IP: Logged |
posted
Justice is suppose to be blind but the laws are the laws . He's trying to reprsent himself Pro Se but still trying to get the whole case dismissed which includes the company and that requires a corp. lawyer to be involved .
It really doesn't matter how many filings this bozo files at this point , the company is in default and the only thing going foward at this point will be how to disolve the company and any assets attached to it . After that , maybe we will get lucky and a few will go to jail over it but I am not holding my breathe on that one .
-------------------- ----- Game Over ----- Posts: 1536 | From: San Antonio - Texas | Registered: Oct 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by thesource: For me the decision was made to sell and I stand by it 100% . In my opinion , there is nothing to be had . No bonds , no assets , no single person to go after to recoup the losses , hell not even a CEO any more since the SEC requested the Dufus be permantely suspended from ever being a board memeber on a publically traded company . [/QB]
John Arlitt is still CEO and still at large.
Posts: 865 | From: Az | Registered: Sep 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Who here is going (or has recently) to sell before the end of the year and take the tax loss (hopefully to offset all those other big gains ?
Does anyone think this will ever trade again and worth keeping because it's not worth selling other than to take the loss this year? I'll get about enough to pay the commission.
In Rufus We Trust (well, that's how we felt 9 months ago), now he's just another scumbag slimeball crook.
-------------------- I may be wrong, but I don't think so.... Posts: 820 | From: Madison, WI | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
here is what makes pennies such easy targets for scamsters..
keep in mind the current legal situation is still civil(as far as we know):
Do you have a legal question? Ask a lawyer now (free service).
intervention n. the procedure under which a third party may join an on-going law-suit, providing the facts and the law issues apply to the intervenor as much as to one of the existing contestants. The determination to allow intervention is made by a judge after a petition to intervene and a hearing on the issue. Intervention must take place fairly early in the lawsuit, shortly after a complaint and answer have been filed, and not just before trial since that could prejudice one or both parties who have prepared for trial on the basis of the original litigants. Intervention is not to be confused with joinder which involves requiring all parties who have similar claims to join in the same lawsuit to prevent needless repetitious trials based on the same facts and legal questions, called multiplicity of actions. (See: intervene, joinder)
in the big leagues? this would have been done in a timely fashion by the shareholders...
in the pennies? nobody cares or (normally) has enough at stake to move ahead as an intervenor....
-------------------- Of the People, by the People and For the People. Posts: 27745 | From: USA | Registered: Sep 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
If you need the tax write off , take it . Other wise you might as well leave it in your account .
As far as it trading again . Its trading right now . Its on the grey market thanks to old Rufus not complying with the SEC so they halted it . So MM's will sign on to it to it remains where it is .
-------------------- ----- Game Over ----- Posts: 1536 | From: San Antonio - Texas | Registered: Oct 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Thats Rufus testing the true longs before its blast off time and the stock is trading at $100.00 per share . Remember they said to short Google and long CSHD . Maybe they are dyslexic ....... nah probably just full of crap .
-------------------- ----- Game Over ----- Posts: 1536 | From: San Antonio - Texas | Registered: Oct 2006
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
?
![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)