"Supreme Bean customers will continue to enjoy great coffee and will now have access to CEOTA’s proprietary coffee roasts, for which CEOTA is becoming increasingly well known. Through this acquisition, we will be able to introduce our lines of super-premium coffees, hot cocoas, blended drinks and teas to a wider audience."
"Well known"? Anyone care to confirm this? Posts: 2308 | From: Michigan | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mr. CATIAEngineer: If you click on their August 15th PR it takes you to filings from a company named "BIG SKY INDUSTRIES I INC"
SC 13D BIG SKY INDUSTRIES V INC 2/14/2001 SC 13D BIG SKY INDUSTRIES II INC 2/14/2001 SC 13D BIG SKY INDUSTRIES X INC 2/14/2001 SC 13D BIG SKY INDUSTRIES VI INC 2/14/2001 SC 13D BIG SKY INDUSTRIES IX INC 2/14/2001 SC 13D BIG SKY INDUSTRIES IV INC 2/14/2001 SC 13D BIG SKY INDUSTRIES VII INC 2/14/2001 SC 13D BIG SKY INDUSTRIES VIII INC 2/14/2001 SC 13D BIG SKY INDUSTRIES I INC 2/14/2001 SC 13D BIG SKY INDUSTRIES III INC 2/14/2001
Incorporater - David Bovi
Posts: 2308 | From: Michigan | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by T e x: by shells, do you mean actively trading entities or merely DBA/names?
At first glance they "look" like shells. But, as I mentioned above I was taken to one of those shells via the link on the CEOTA page. I guess Big Sky Industries I Inc could be DBA "CEOTA" (or would it be the other way around? heh).
It just seems strange to me that CEOTA would be used after what happened with the log deal.
Posts: 2308 | From: Michigan | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Stockstar69: Out of the woodwork...Amazing, I haven't seen so many familiar names since the (good) old CSHD days. Catia, Tex, Milliam, PCola...
Even the due dilligence, as good as it is to tie this (new) Ceota thing together is excellent.
Just don't fall for it again...PLEASE!
Fall for it?
Naaa...just keeping tabs on the Furia bunch. Watching and learning. Posts: 2308 | From: Michigan | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged |
that damn parrot was on the old CEOTA site as well. they couldn't even change the graphic, too funny - con
Posts: 140 | From: CT | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Not much coming in from RPH's board, but I don't get to keep up with it as much. RPH is still posting some.
I've got a new job where I actually have to do work. Interesting concept, but it seems to correlate with a paycheck that doesn't bounce. Good luck to us all.
Posts: 1028 | From: Georgia | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
I think RPH knows Don is dirty based on several of his recent posts. Saying that Don is involved in pump and dump operations in several companies he is involved in promoting and consulting for.
Interesting that Don hasn't made any of his "losing my cool" posts recently. Can't wait for him to fry.
Posts: 98 | From: Nowhereville, USA | Registered: May 2008
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Ironman64: So, you have the proof that the SEC hasn't found in almost 2 years? There was a dump with CSHD, but it wasn't Harris that orchestrated it.
Unless you can bring forth the proof to show otherwise.....
Just when you think this is dead, everyone starts talking about it again...
Where is the shareholders class action lawsuit against the SEC??? That's the question of the day. Posts: 2498 | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Just throwing this one out there....as a theory...
Would it excite anyone here if, hypothetically, a member of the FBI/CIA/SS, etc....made a comment to a shareholder that we should just be patient and let this play out with CSHD?
Hmmmmmm......
Posts: 98 | From: Nowhereville, USA | Registered: May 2008
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Ironman64: Just throwing this one out there....as a theory...
Would it excite anyone here if, hypothetically, a member of the FBI/CIA/SS, etc....made a comment to a shareholder that we should just be patient and let this play out with CSHD?
Hmmmmmm......
no. sounds like simply more of the same wild-azz, wide-eyed lunacy.
Another poster made the relevant point: shareholders should sue.
posted
Knock yourself out, those that want to sue. Now again, who is the target of this suit?
Posts: 98 | From: Nowhereville, USA | Registered: May 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
Looks like we have another foretelling prophet on our hands. The first one was a mummy, what are you?
Posts: 854 | From: Alpharetta, GA | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Ironman64: Knock yourself out, those that want to sue. Now again, who is the target of this suit?
why, who else but Harris and his crew of corporate officers including the FHAL ignore-the-debt to Corey picnic?
He signed off on the famous "$15 reset," not to mention all that blathering, straight-up bullhooey about moon colonies and the Vatican and changing the market forever and too-much-to-list-here.
Let me ask you this?
How much do you figure insiders raked offa this play?
posted
So, what's your angle? You seem to be equally sure as I, except on the other side of the spectrum.
I am willing to keep it civil as long as you do the same. But, honestly, would like to see what proof you and the the others on IHUB have...I mean hard proof.
Posts: 98 | From: Nowhereville, USA | Registered: May 2008
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Ironman64: So, what's your angle? You seem to be equally sure as I, except on the other side of the spectrum.
I am willing to keep it civil as long as you do the same. But, honestly, would like to see what proof you and the the others on IHUB have...I mean hard proof.
apparently, you're not familiar with my posts...
quick background: got burned as a newbie, by a notorious PnD crew, the leader of which was in Riker's last I knew, apparently having been caught after graduating from simple PnD plays to hacking folks' trading accounts. Quite the escalation, that...
Anyway, I progressed to becoming an admin mod, here...not exactly analogous to the admin mods at da hub, but much more so than the "mods" on individual threads over there. If you keep posting here, you'll learn who the other mods are--as i said, not the same as da hub.
Now...my deal? Basically, I believe the more good traders, the better. To that end, I hate to see newbs get sucked into the undertow of a big ol' scam. For one, if they associate getting scammed with Allstocks, they may feel so discouraged that they leave Allstocks, never to return.
That's one thing.
BUT--if they feel so burned that they quit trading altogether? That hurts all good traders...
As far as being civil? lol, I can get cantakerous at times, but mostly I aim to be one of the more civil posters you'll ever meet. Well...over a body of work, that is... For instance, that guy in Riker's? I used to rip him pretty hard, when he showed up with yet-another-alias.
So...what about your history?
Where you wanna start on this play?
Will say this: from my position of strength, I don't necessarily need "proof" of anything: all a good trader needs is sufficient evidence of rational doubt.
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Confused]](confused.gif)
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[BadOne]](graemlins/headbash.gif)
![[More Crap]](graemlins/morecrap.png)
