posted
I do not care to give out personal information on my identity. That is not required in this discussion. So, move on and get over it.
I don't believe you buy into your own answers. The blueprint is there, you just don't understand it. As for the theory, oh, I just can stop laughing at your response. Wonder how you would feel if you received such a response from a member of one of those agencies.
You sir, are not a critical thinker.
Posts: 98 | From: Nowhereville, USA | Registered: May 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
By the way, have you ever wondered why not ONE single shareholder has sued this company at any point?
Lawsuits, whether frivilous or not, occur every day in this country. It has been said that Waatle shareholders approved the merger with Fronthaul. Wouldn't you think that just one of these individuals would initiate a lawsuit, with the loss of wealth after this merger....unless they know and trust what is currently happening?
C'mon...critical thinking my friends.
Posts: 98 | From: Nowhereville, USA | Registered: May 2008
| IP: Logged |
quote:I do not care to give out personal information on my identity. That is not required in this discussion.
lol, who asked about personal information?
Remember when you wanted to start a "civil discussion"?
Your tone here is not too civil:
quote:So, move on and get over it.
quote:You sir, are not a critical thinker.
***** Now, here I have no idea what you mean:
quote:Wonder how you would feel if you received such a response from a member of one of those agencies.
As far as this goes ...
quote:By the way, have you ever wondered why not ONE single shareholder has sued this company at any point?
well, my response ties into what you mention...But, sure, I believe a lawsuit is the shareholders' only real chance to get a look at the full story and maybe the only way to achieve disgorgement. However, 1) lawsuits are expensive, so any one or two individuals are not likely to mount a lawsuit on their own, and 2)Harris has succeeded in keeping a segment of shareholders at least somewhat mollified--and of those, I'm not aware of many who display critical thinking skills.
To get any traction, you simply must argue better--so far, all you're doing is rehash of Pope's and changing the markets and crushing evil shorty, etc...
Far from a rehash. Remember this, and remember it well...when this is completed....the court case was but a minor speedbump in the overall successful completion of this journey. You think you have it all figured out, but the one thing you may try to explain, but can't, is why in the hell is the court case still lingering, uncompleted. There is a reason, sir....and therein will lie all the answers everyone needs to know to put this to rest. Once it is completed, everyone will say....WOW!!!
Lastly, read slowly this time...how would you feel if it were YOU that had the connections to communicate with a colleague within the CIA/FBI/SS and you were told to be patient and let this thing run its course. Further, what if you were told that "all is fine" from someone in one of these agencies that would know? Understand now? Resist the temptation to muddy the water and simply answer the question tex.
Posts: 98 | From: Nowhereville, USA | Registered: May 2008
| IP: Logged |
quote:. . .but the one thing you may try to explain, but can't, is why in the hell is the court case still lingering, uncompleted.
all I know is the SEC and feds are notoriously slow, unless something requires prompt attention. Put it this way: what do Cassavant, Pino, and Olsen have in common? Did you notice *yet another delay* in the OSC hearing re: SLUJ?
Or are you saying all these players are together in this momentous "WOW!!!" ?
quote:Further, what if you were told that "all is fine" from someone in one of these agencies that would know? Understand now?
No, I don't... I mean, I do have some of those connections, but nobody's told me anything.
So in your hypothetical situation, what role would I be in to get this "all is fine" answer?
posted
Critical thinking consists of mental processes of discernment, analysis and evaluation. It includes possible processes of reflecting upon a tangible or intangible item in order to form a solid judgment that reconciles scientific evidence with common sense. In contemporary usage "critical" has a certain negative connotation that does not apply in the present case. Though the term "analytical thinking" may seem to convey the idea more accurately, critical thinking clearly involves synthesis, evaluation, and reconstruction of thinking, in addition to analysis.
Critical thinkers gather information from all senses, verbal and/or written expressions, reflection, observation, experience and reasoning. Critical thinking has its basis in intellectual criteria that go beyond subject-matter divisions and which include: clarity, credibility, accuracy, precision, relevance, depth, breadth, logic, significance and fairness.
Those that disagree with your theories because they are absent of facts are indeed applying Critical thinking. In fact what you are asking is that people here use a different type of thinking generally used in movie making, the Suspension of Disbelief.
Posts: 2832 | From: Los Angeles California | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Tex -- Your last question in your previous post....(So in your hypothetical situation, what role would I be in to get this "all is fine" answer?) -- What do you think? Who do you think? Someone connected / involved? At liberty only to say this....good question and very warm....
Wally -- LMAOROFL -- you are exactly what that post refers to.... I honestly can't wait to see the reactions of ones like you as you fall on the floor twitching....unable to process. Hehehehe.
Posts: 98 | From: Nowhereville, USA | Registered: May 2008
| IP: Logged |
quote:Tex -- Your last question in your previous post....(So in your hypothetical situation, what role would I be in to get this "all is fine" answer?) -- What do you think? Who do you think? Someone connected / involved? At liberty only to say this....good question and very warm....
you're playing games, dude...
look, you initiated the "discussion," and I'm discussing--but I can't "enter" your hypothetical world with all these guessing games. To answer the question, I have to know from what perspective...
quote:Originally posted by Ironman64: Tex -- Your last question in your previous post....(So in your hypothetical situation, what role would I be in to get this "all is fine" answer?) -- What do you think? Who do you think? Someone connected / involved? At liberty only to say this....good question and very warm....
Wally -- LMAOROFL -- you are exactly what that post refers to.... I honestly can't wait to see the reactions of ones like you as you fall on the floor twitching....unable to process. Hehehehe.
Rufus, you have been saying that since before the SEC shut you down. Nothing has changed.
Instead of playing these games that you love so much, how about answering some questions like:
What happened to the proxy and everything else you promised? Not one came to fruition. What effect does that have on critical thinking? Posts: 2832 | From: Los Angeles California | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Wally -- I enjoy your comedy, really, but you and I both know this is not Harris. Regarding proxy and other strategic pieces of information, have you ever once thought that those statements were intended for other eyes and ears?
Tex -- I will put you out of your own misery, since you are bored. And just as things were getting interesting. Just earmark our recent conversations until a later date, when you will marvel at the content here.
Posts: 98 | From: Nowhereville, USA | Registered: May 2008
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Ironman64: Wally -- I enjoy your comedy, really, but you and I both know this is not Harris. Regarding proxy and other strategic pieces of information, have you ever once thought that those statements were intended for other eyes and ears?
Tex -- I will put you out of your own misery, since you are bored. And just as things were getting interesting. Just earmark our recent conversations until a later date, when you will marvel at the content here.
So what if we earmark it and nothing happens to marvel over?
BTW, it can't be Harris. This guy has a semblance of grammar, spelling, and punctuation in his posts.
Posts: 848 | From: Alpharetta, GA | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Tex -- being located in Ft. Worth, have you ever spoken with any of the major Texas players involved with CSHD?
Posts: 98 | From: Nowhereville, USA | Registered: May 2008
| IP: Logged |
posted
So, is there anything you can shed light on that lets you have this zero doubt?
Posts: 848 | From: Alpharetta, GA | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Interesting city you come from Ironman, because that's exactly where your unclear line of reasoning originated from.
I read through all your cryptic nonsense and couldn't come up with 1 concrete fact or speculative statement. If you just came out and said, "Pigs canfly." I could at least respect you for the clarity of your conviction. but as it stand you have said nothing over dozens of posts and insulted 2 of the most respected posters here. nice job.
Posts: 937 | From: Little Rock, AR | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Ironman64: Wally -- I enjoy your comedy, really, but you and I both know this is not Harris. Regarding proxy and other strategic pieces of information, have you ever once thought that those statements were intended for other eyes and ears?
Tex -- I will put you out of your own misery, since you are bored. And just as things were getting interesting. Just earmark our recent conversations until a later date, when you will marvel at the content here.
Interesting that you post, "This is not Harris", instead of the more appropriate, I'm not Harris.
Also interesting that you intimate that claims were made as a smoke screen when they also used similar wording of mark this post. So is this just another in a long line of smoke screens?
Posts: 2832 | From: Los Angeles California | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[BadOne]](graemlins/headbash.gif)
![[Wall Bang]](graemlins/wallbang.gif)
![[More Crap]](graemlins/morecrap.png)