You really are joking right? Are you now a conspiracy theorist? Wow, are you now going to take another look at what happened on 9/11?
You right wing christians. What arrogance. Can't admit you were juked out of your money.
*************************************************
10, & you were worried about me telling him WalMart called him....WOW....Are you going to go on the other board & tell him that his post wasn't nice??.... or just me.......'cause what I said was MUCH worse...RIGHT?
-------------------- ..just remember....Family is EVERYTHING!!
IP: Logged |
posted
frank posts: "Tex I hear what you are saying but if CSHD is a pump and dump I would suggest firing the current folks at the helm of this debaccle....the PPS speaks volumes."
frank, I don't know who knows "the current folks at the helm of this debaccle..." According to PRs filed under company name, Arlett (sp?) resigned as CEO, and according to company bylaws the BOD must appoint a new one, but if that has happened I'm not aware of it. Have also seen some speculation that RPH was *never* legally removed--but if that is true, I would think a clarification could have been issued by now.
[ June 13, 2007, 02:48: Message edited by: T e x ]
-------------------- Nashoba Holba Chepulechi Adventures in microcapitalism...
IP: Logged |
posted
i responded to your pm...feel free to read it...and yes..i am a christian also...but hey what if i told you I WORK AT WALMART? would you feel bad?
and no i don't...the point is it wasn't a slam to the guy you were posting to...it was a slam to WALMART workers... Take a chill pill Jenna...
quote:Originally posted by Jenna:
quote:Originally posted by 10of13: OT;(or should I say off board) jenna? that walmart calling comment? kinda not nice...IMO
I'm a Christian & took offense to what he said...was that ok???
-------------------- #1 Rule: Protect your capital! #2 Rule: Never fall for the BS on the boards!
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by 66inxs: that's right - "ego games just gonna cost people money". and some of us are doing stocks to try and make money!! time has a way of seperating the wheat from the chafe(sic) and the bottom line is "did we make money on this?" i believe that there is still a cluster of good traders on this board and that we should avoid "getting swept up in the drama" and deviating from the trading practices that have made some of us pretty good money. when we post stuff on another board like:
"Any of you Allstockers out there? I need some back up on there....I'm bringing Mr. Harris' info over there & the loyal shareholders over there like it but then I get a few every night who try to fight with me.....
Tex is at it again, putting down RPH, there is a little buddy of his there too....
I'm doing real well fighting them off but it's just getting to the point where I'm sooo done with these fools...."
it tends to make some of us stop and think about the merits of participating in these board discussions. i guess this makes me a "fool" too as i have always appreciated what Tex, Wallymac, Frank, Repo and other have brought to this board. imho some of this is just over the top. cshd has taught me a lot about the market and how it works and those of us who have read 1000's of pages of posts on it have sure got a good education from it.
p.s. sorry about the rant!!
lol, who was posting for "help"?
Wonder who my "little buddy" is?
-------------------- Nashoba Holba Chepulechi Adventures in microcapitalism...
IP: Logged |
posted
No Tex...I guess jenna isn't winning... she got frustrated...but i am sure she will get some sleep and wake up to see things in a different light...maybe...
Going to bed now...enough drama for today...Sleep well all...
-------------------- #1 Rule: Protect your capital! #2 Rule: Never fall for the BS on the boards!
IP: Logged |
posted
Mr. CE posts: "You called SPR yourself Tex....right in the middle of a hoedown it sounded like (lots of hootin' and hollerin' in the background). Sorry for my presumption but why bother to call SPR when Simon was waiting on Rufus when you seemed to have more important things going on at home...things that were truly your business. You dont even own shares heh. I think its safe for Jenna, and anyone else, to assume SOMEONE has your attention and since Rufus is running the show maybe she just put 2 and 2 together eh?"
yoiks, Mr. CE...have been on SPR many times, first after hearing my nick had been mentioned there. Has been a pleasant experience...sometimes I just call, sometimes I'm invited/asked to clarify something. However, I believe you're referring to the night I *got* called... as I remember, we've even discussed this, you and I...is on this thread, I *think.* Maybe not...lol, there's so many threads, now...
the "hoedown" you mention, if that was the night, was my son and his friends in another room watching a ball game... "things truly" my business include all topics related to trading. As I've posted before, I follow lottsa stuff, but am drawn to "geek plays" because of the opportunity to learn so much in a compressed amount of time. For instance, I would've been answering here sooner tonight but i was following an interesting exchange elsewhere between board members and the BHUB CEO... I "cut my teeth" so to speak on GLUV/GVRP/MAMG/PEDG--which is when I coined the term geek play.
And no, it's not RPH so much that "has my attention" re CSHD, but whomever/whatever is current or interesting about the play itself...for example, if Mike Alexander "pops up" with new stuff? I'm interested... make sense?
[ June 13, 2007, 02:50: Message edited by: T e x ]
-------------------- Nashoba Holba Chepulechi Adventures in microcapitalism...
IP: Logged |
posted
Milliam posts: Tex, its pretty apparent that you feel this is a scam. I understand you're trying to keep us safe and maybe that's your job as a mod. I don't think you can definitely say one way or another what the outcome of this will be. I do agree that it seems far-fetched that this will work out, but some of us feel that it will. Do you believe that NSS is an issue in the markets? Do you think there is a way to stop it?
"keep us safe" .......hmmmm? well, gosh, how to answer that? ya, is true, I've busted a bunch of attempts to rope newbies into frontloaded, group gropes. But, truth be told, *most* of that happened before I became a mod... and...I was not alone... A few other members who helped back then are still active, some are not. Otherwise, I've *helped* expose just plain, out-n-out fakery & lies. But again, that's just me... As a member here, I believe that's a "civic duty," if you will... To me a mod's main role is just that, moderate and modulate. For example, what might be "acceptable" on Off-Topics, clearly has no place in stock threads... What might be acceptable after-hours or during weekends in a stock thread is *not* acceptable during trading. On the other hand, one thread seems to "put up with" distractions while another thread is "all business" and raises billy-hell about distractions. I think we can agree it is *very* subjective. All I can say is I really try to give ample, repeated notice before I act as a mod...sometimes that's not possible--or even necessary: eg, "spam" simply gets reported then deleted.
re definitely how this will "work out"... wow, no one knows the future. Logic dictates a bleak outlook, however. For one, simple example, Mr. Catia Engineer posted about a recent SPR show; as I recall, that was the same show in which RPH said he involved an attorney for his personal response but would not do so for the company response because attorneys would "just muck it up." I trust you see the inherent contradiction.
re NSS: I think naked shorting is despicable. I understand MMs need to do a certain amount in order to fill trades in a timely manner. But somewhere, somehow there *must* be better controls on keeping records. For anyone -- ANY ONE -- else to be able to naked short is just wrong. As far as stopping it, I would remove brokers'/broker-dealers' ability to mark a transaction as anything other than what it is.
Now, it's also an "easy out" for a less-than-honest company to blame NSS for their woes. We see that all over the place...
The other aspect to stopping it is to realize the "system" has not adjusted to mom n pop, online trading. Basically, we "joe retail" traders need a dam fine lobbyist...the quicker, the better.
-------------------- Nashoba Holba Chepulechi Adventures in microcapitalism...
IP: Logged |
posted
Well, I spent my last 40 bucks on this "gamble" and today im holding my cert. I have both stamps and of course Arlitts signature. The cert includes all of my pre 10/16 shares as well as a few grey sheet shares (a test so to speak).
My shares are 1 year old on Friday by the way.....what a memorable anniversary!
IP: Logged |
posted
Anyone know who Sam is that Rufus refers to in his answer to Lee Webb? Sir,
You and Sam are out of line here. My horses have nothing to do with the shaereholders or CSHD. You better beleve my attorney will be contacting you about your article and smear campain! How much is Sam paying you for your daily articles? Yes Sam! I'm on to you to! You better hope your shorts are covered and I think you know what I mean!
Godspeed
Posted by Rufus Paul Harris * 2007-06-12 20:40
IP: Logged |
posted
10, I didn't count horses, but I'm pretty sure there were about 6 in the stable we were in. I think I remember seeing at least 4 or so in the pasture. Mind you I couldn't see the whole pasture due to the hills. There was another set of stables as well that I didn't go to. From what I could tell, all of the accomodations were great and the horses seemed well kept, but I'm no horse guy.
IP: Logged |
posted
SEC Votes To End Short-Selling 'Grandfather' Protections June 13, 2007 11:23 ET By Judith Burns Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES
WASHINGTON (Dow Jones)--The Securities and Exchange Commission voted Wednesday to approve a change to tighten rules intended to curb manipulative short sales, including so-called "naked" short sales.
The change eliminates a controversial exception that shielded existing short positions from requirements to deliver hard-to-borrow shares within 13 days of settlement. Once the change takes effect, short positions previously protected by the grandfather clause must be closed out within 35 days.
SEC Chairman Christopher Cox said persistent failures to deliver shares sold short seem to be due to the grandfather protections, which the SEC included in 2004 to prevent stock-market volatility. Critics complained the protections undermined efforts to clean up abuses involving "naked" short sales.
Short selling involves sales of borrowed securities, producing profits when prices decline. The practice is legal, but the SEC's Regulation SHO sought to prevent "naked" short sales, in which short sellers don't borrow securities they sell.
SEC officials said delivery failures have declined about 35% overall since Regulation SHO took effect and have fallen about 53% for hard-to-borrow stocks defined as "threshold" securities.
-By Judith Burns, Dow Jones Newswires, 202-862-6692; Judith.Burns*dowjones.com (END) Dow Jones Newswires
IP: Logged |
posted
Correct... #3 on their list of things to do today!
Interesting
Open Meeting Agenda Wednesday, June 13, 2007 Agenda as of June 11, 2007. Note that Open Meeting agendas are subject to last-minute changes.
Item 1: Amendments to Regulation SHO
Division: Division of Market Regulation
Staff: James Brigagliano, Josephine Tao, Joan Collopy, Lillian Hagen, Victoria Crane, Elizabeth Sandoe
Item 2: Re-proposed Amendments to Regulation SHO
Division: Division of Market Regulation
Staff: James Brigagliano, Josephine Tao, Joan Collopy, Lillian Hagen, Victoria Crane, Elizabeth Sandoe
Item 3: Short Selling in Connection with a Public Offering
Division: Division of Market Regulation
Staff: James Brigagliano, Josephine Tao, Joan Collopy, Elizabeth Sandoe, Victoria Crane
Item 4: Regulation SHO and Rule 10a-1
Division: Division of Market Regulation
Staff: James Brigagliano, Josephine Tao, Victoria Crane
.. ... .. Item 3: Short Selling in Connection with a Public Offering The Commission will consider whether to adopt amendments to Rule 105 of Regulation M that would further safeguard the integrity of the capital raising process and protect issuers from manipulative activity that can reduce issuers' offering proceeds and dilute security holder value.
For further information, please contact James Brigagliano, Josephine Tao, Joan Collopy, Elizabeth Sandoe, or Victoria Crane at (202) 551-5720.
IP: Logged |
posted
Tim...I'm not sure how to read you on this. From what I've read and heard (I was watching the SEC meeting), they voted to eliminate the grandfather clause. This doesn't really have anything to do with public offerings.
IP: Logged |
posted
I'm praying that he's being sarcastic. If someone *really* thinks one had anything to do with the other, I think I'd be in total shock.
quote:Originally posted by milliam: Tim...I'm not sure how to read you on this. From what I've read and heard (I was watching the SEC meeting), they voted to eliminate the grandfather clause. This doesn't really have anything to do with public offerings.
quote:Originally posted by milliam: Tim...I'm not sure how to read you on this. From what I've read and heard (I was watching the SEC meeting), they voted to eliminate the grandfather clause. This doesn't really have anything to do with public offerings.
I was going off of what was on the website agenda.
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by 10of13: Tim? did you ever comment on the post you made the other day? About being quiet for a couple of days...the one with the gabreeders link?
No i didnt comment.. thats part of being quiet.. . Just kidding...
Those comments i made didnt belong together.. gabreeders was as someone else mentioned, missing a key horse in his arsenal, however the gabreeders site does have some evidence to contradict the "story" about animal cruelty, such as having housing for the horses, as many shareholders saw at the BBQ. Doesnt add up that they can say the horses had no stables.
The "watch" comment was meant to go towards the SEC activity... My apologies for not clarifying. Just seemed to be out in the open evidence to contradict the animal cruelty and the timing of the 'arrest' with the sec events is just way to coincidental for me to swallow.
posted
Tim...when the AC said he had no housing for the animals...they were talking about whrere RPH moved the horses to...which was his home...and I don't remember there being a stable/barn/detached garage or any other structure in the picture
Thanks for posting on the comment...and clarifying
-------------------- #1 Rule: Protect your capital! #2 Rule: Never fall for the BS on the boards!
IP: Logged |
posted
Interesting site Tim. It looks like they might only add cases that people send them info on though. I could be wrong, but that's what it looks like.
IP: Logged |
posted
Someone posted this on stock watch in response to Lee Webb's last article:
Mr. Lee, I advise that you stop posting fictuous articles. Our office has received numerous calls, overwhelming our staff and causing real cases to be delayed. We are a business that has animal interests in mind, and can not play devils advocate for your slander and libel. We have not followed with charges on this man you speak of, and your stories are interferring with our business. Call volume at our location has more than quadrupled in the last days, and every caller is calling to confirm your story. This is not true, you are interferring with cases of animals that truely need help. Our staff has more important calls to take.
Remove all mentions of our business from your post and further notes.
Cordially, Bartow County Humane Society Bartow County Animal Control
Posted by Undisclosed * 2007-06-13 14:59
IP: Logged |
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Cool]](cool.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
