close Email this News Article Your Name Your Email Friend's Name Friend's Email Receive Copy: yes
AUGC 0.00 -0.0001
Today 5d 1m 3m 1y 5y 10y
AuGRID Moving Toward Closure On Acquisitions VINELAND, N.J., Dec. 20, 2006 (PRIME NEWSWIRE) -- AuGRID Global Holdings Corporation (Pink Sheets:AUGC) has moved to closure by finishing the definitive agreement of sale with the American acquisition and near completion of the same type of final document for the Chinese acquisition due to International law; however we are working round the clock to finalize documentation to complete the acquisition and begin the financing phase. The NOBO list is being investigated share-by-share to ascertain and narrow down the short position.
Forward-Looking Statement:
This press release contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. The statements regarding AuGRID Corporation in this release that are not historical in nature, particularly those that utilize terminology such as "may," "should," "likely," "expects," "anticipates," "estimates," "believes" or "plans," or comparable terminology, are forward-looking statements based on current expectations about future events, which AuGRID Corporation has derived from the information currently available to it. These forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks and uncertainties that may cause our results to be materially different from results implied in such forward-looking statements. Important factors known to AuGRID Corporation that could cause forward-looking statements to turn out to be incorrect are identified and discussed from time to time in AuGRID Corporation's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The forward-looking statements contained in this release speak only as of the date hereof, and AuGRID Corporation undertakes no obligation to correct or update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
CONTACT: AuGRID Corporation Staff (856) 205-0856
Source: PrimeZone (December 20, 2006 - 10:01 AM EST)
posted
The last time I saw N/A it was for CSHD - when it was suspended....OH No I take that back I saw that for LFZA when it changed symbols to USSE but I knew that was coming....
-------------------- ..just remember....Family is EVERYTHING!! Posts: 3944 | From: Rochester, NY | Registered: Sep 2006
| IP: Logged |
is it too late to own this, what’s the deal w this stock i saw the pr. w such a low pps the have got to be too many shares to count in the float but i could see how this could be a quick double or triple upon completion. How many shares u in with?
Posts: 140 | From: CT | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Hi, just peeking in to say hello, I'm going to watch some tv.I'm sure I'll probably check in later. Posts: 360 | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged |
i noticed this was at a penny in the last year wow. but your volume in dec. look good. this may be one of those examples of n shorting a stock into oblivion. lets hope it no CSHD in a few...
what does you dd tell you about this besides the PR? i may throw a few hundred at it also
Posts: 140 | From: CT | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
if 9M is a typical day for volume its only trading around a thousand dollars a day for volume.
even the 4B dollar by back would only be 400k in monitary value. doesn't bode well for the out look on the future market cap of this co. if this is being thrown out there as a major by back.
Posts: 140 | From: CT | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mr. CATIAEngineer: Doc, I hope Arlitt SEVERELY disappoints you and proves that even YOU dont have all of the answers. If you knew "all along" that the guy screaming shorters the loudest was probably the guilty one then why did you remain an investor?! Why did you let your own daughter leave her money invested when you KNEW Rufus was just going to short it and leave her broke?
When you first came into this board people distrusted you because of some of your comments, and then you retracted those comments so people would like you again. Oddly enough it appears you never really changed your mind, you just refrained from posting your true feelings....until now of course since Rufus is such an easy target.
Its no secret that I hate what Rufus did to some people. He either A-Scammed everyone or B-Was legit but got in over his head.....in either case he lost some people A LOT of money. But, you....nor any other self proclaimed securities law professional on this board, have any right to post such inflammatory things against a guy that has not even been judged yet! And, do you think I gave a "F" what Tony Soprano has to say?!?! Who the hell is he to me?!
This board is FULL of people either brainwashing or being brainwashed themselves....which is why i rarely post anymore. Some of you people will believe anything. Where the hell are our Gates of Victory huh?
Wake up people, Arlitt isnt your savior. If you are looking for someone who probably made a mint off of this you might want to look his direction...of course hes a German Canadian with ties all over the world so i doubt you will find what you are looking for.
Oh, and the SCH keeps getting brought up as well. Again i say, on what legal grounds do we have a SHC?!?! None
You have shown your true colors. Don't ever question how I treat my family. I will never question how you treat yours. I choose as I told you in the answer to you PM that you sent,to stay in this and to give our new CEO a fair chance to upright our company. If you have such little confidence in him, why don't you sell your shares? For you to bring up the way I was received on this site several months ago, in my opinion; is extremely callous and ignorant. Most of the people from that night have become good friends of mine. I can now see that one of them that I considered a friend is far from that. You have a right to believe in whomever you want to and because you believe in that person I promise I won't question your purpose. All I ask from you is not to question my purpose or what I do for my family that I love with all my heart. Show a little more class then you did in this post.
Posts: 557 | From: UpState New York | Registered: Sep 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mr. CATIAEngineer: Doc, I hope Arlitt SEVERELY disappoints you and proves that even YOU dont have all of the answers. If you knew "all along" that the guy screaming shorters the loudest was probably the guilty one then why did you remain an investor?! Why did you let your own daughter leave her money invested when you KNEW Rufus was just going to short it and leave her broke?
When you first came into this board people distrusted you because of some of your comments, and then you retracted those comments so people would like you again. Oddly enough it appears you never really changed your mind, you just refrained from posting your true feelings....until now of course since Rufus is such an easy target.
Its no secret that I hate what Rufus did to some people. He either A-Scammed everyone or B-Was legit but got in over his head.....in either case he lost some people A LOT of money. But, you....nor any other self proclaimed securities law professional on this board, have any right to post such inflammatory things against a guy that has not even been judged yet! And, do you think I gave a "F" what Tony Soprano has to say?!?! Who the hell is he to me?!
This board is FULL of people either brainwashing or being brainwashed themselves....which is why i rarely post anymore. Some of you people will believe anything. Where the hell are our Gates of Victory huh?
Wake up people, Arlitt isnt your savior. If you are looking for someone who probably made a mint off of this you might want to look his direction...of course hes a German Canadian with ties all over the world so i doubt you will find what you are looking for.
Oh, and the SCH keeps getting brought up as well. Again i say, on what legal grounds do we have a SHC?!?! None
Mr. C .....You have shown your true colors. Don't ever question how I treat my family. I will never question how you treat yours. I choose as I told you in the answer to you PM that you sent,to stay in this and to give our new CEO a fair chance to upright our company. If you have such little confidence in him, why don't you sell your shares? For you to bring up the way I was received on this site several months ago, in my opinion; is extremely callous and ignorant. Most of the people from that night have become good friends of mine. I can now see that one of them that I considered a friend is far from that. You have a right to believe in whomever you want to and because you believe in that person I promise I won't question your purpose. All I ask from you is not to question my purpose or what I do for my family that I love with all my heart. Show a little more class then you did in this post.
Posts: 557 | From: UpState New York | Registered: Sep 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
very nice post doc, very classy reply, we all have our own opinion as to who can do the better job as CEO and imo rufus is not the one.
this is what is so nice about these bulleton boards, they are all about opinions, personal attacks right now could be because of frustration and broken dreams, hopefully posters won't post comments to riun their credibility.
this company still has a chance, but only if it is managed by the right CEO.
Posts: 572 | From: usa | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by driver4t4: very nice post doc, very classy reply, we all have our own opinion as to who can do the better job as CEO and imo rufus is not the one.
this is what is so nice about these bulleton boards, they are all about opinions, personal attacks right now could be because of frustration and broken dreams, hopefully posters won't post comments to riun their credibility.
this company still has a chance, but only if it is managed by the right CEO.
Thanks Driver ... Posts: 557 | From: UpState New York | Registered: Sep 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
10 .... What a great birthday present you received. A son safely home. Congrats. Posts: 557 | From: UpState New York | Registered: Sep 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by driver4t4: very nice post doc, very classy reply, we all have our own opinion as to who can do the better job as CEO and imo rufus is not the one.
this is what is so nice about these bulleton boards, they are all about opinions, personal attacks right now could be because of frustration and broken dreams, hopefully posters won't post comments to riun their credibility.
this company still has a chance, but only if it is managed by the right CEO.
posted
Grrrr Doc, i had a huge post for you and misclicked....losing it all. The bottom line was, i wasnt telling you how to treat your family. I have no idea what your family life is about. But, you claim to have known all along what Rufus's agenda was so why didnt you urge Jenna to sell? My point is, you didnt know anything for sure but now that people are piling on Rufus you are jumping on the bandwagon.......again. Which brings up why i mentioned how you originally came onto this board. Maybe you were too timid to speak your "true" mind back then because you were being attacked in the boards, thats VERY understandable. But, now that you think Rufus is the root of all evil you are willing to speak out against him. I sincerely hope your decisions arent based on any "leaked" info from the SHC or directors of the company. Ive heard a lot of that stuff myself and its a LOAD of BS. Do your DD again on Arlitt and this time let it soak in. Everyone was so happy to see Rufus go they didnt even realize the POS that took his place!!!! For YEARS he has been a paid pumper brought onboard to make something out of nothing. DD the man!!! Hell, as Tut he went on and on telling people how great this company was going to be and that his DD showed that this was going to be a lottery ticket for everyone involved!! Uhhhh, if his DD was so great then why are we here at this point today?
Heres the deal Doc. Ive been speaking with Jenna off and on and im actually concerned about some of the things she has been told. Shes a sweet person and I feel she has been targetted. With that said, people.....plllleeeeeease dont send me any more "know boat" propaganda. Im not interested in what Arlitt has been filling peoples minds with.
To top off the Arlitt nonsense I personally i feel there is AT LEAST one poster on this board that is not here for the same reasons as the rest of us, probably working for Arlitt. Im talking about people that have earned the trust of some very good people here and then used those people to spread false information. You people know who you are and im sure your post history is all archived someplace. Oooh, i bet all of your PMs are archived as well...better be careful!!
So, Doc....as you can see im pretty much pissed off and it was never intended to be directed at you. I stand by the "facts" i posted in regards to you but unfortunately i made it personal and it was not in good taste. I apologize for the way i worded things regarding you and and your daughter, i seriously did not mean it how it came across. If you dont believe me ask Jenna about the PMs i had with her between me inital post and this post. My outburst against you was just my final straw after hearing MORE crap from the HSM "insiders".
I intended to come on this morning and explain myself a bit more regarding Arlitt. Again, i had a long detailed post but messed it up so here is the shortened version.
The stuff below is MY OPINION and should be taken as that...................
I personally believe that Sabra set this all up. Rufus was likely a pawn and believed in everything he posted, said and PRd. Its possible even Mike Alexander was clueless of what Sabra was up to as well but the whole CEOTA thing keeps me on the fence with that one. I spoke with Rufus over the phone after the merger agreement was released and he explained the $15 a share. I asked about the log deal and he said "Its not what we originally hoped it would be". He probably found out the hard way that it was bogus. Im wondering why he didnt bail right at that moment but maybe Sabra and company convinced him to hang in there. I also believe that when the PPS didnt skyrocket like Sabra hoped she hired Arlitt to "do what he does" and pump like mad over on HSM, hence Tut. If you really think about it folks, who pumped the CSHD pps the most....was it Rufus or was it Tut? Seriously, think about that. Everyone keeps saying that Rufus wanted the SHC and the SHC voted in Arlitt so why feel sorry for Rufus?! Well, what if Rufus was instructed to play it out like that?
Heres some final food for thought. Historically when a scam like this takes place the scamsters run like rats when the game is over. The ONLY person posting as himself on HSM and speaking as himself on SPR is Rufus Paul Harris. Everyone else (including a chunk of the SHC no one voted on to begin with) has slowly disappeared, some with vague explainations...some with nothing at all. Other than that we have some people posting under aliases at HSM pretending to still care about the shareholders...but what are they doing exactly?
There is no doubt there was a HUGE scam pulled somewhere along the way here. But, if everyone just throws in the towel and assumes Rufus is the guilty party here i think we have just lost whatever fight we had left in us.
WV1973, i also owe you an apology. You tried to warn me about Arlitt a LONG time ago and i fought you on it.
PurlGurl, if you ever read this anymore ive found your posts over at SI very informative. I'll be bashed to high heaven for saying this but more people should have taken your posts to heart and maybe things would have been uncovered sooner. Nice DD work, especially on Arlitt and the other folks from his hood.
PS - If you dont like my "true colors" it wont break my heart Posts: 2308 | From: Michigan | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Hmmm...the "big pumpers" have turned on each other...and now it spreads to the "small posters"...? Money sucks!
Cat? I understand your intent...People have been "fooled and mislead"...and ALL the truths are not out yet...let's wait to "hear and see the truths"...BEFORE giving a verdict...IF the truth is ever revealed...
-------------------- #1 Rule: Protect your capital! #2 Rule: Never fall for the BS on the boards! Posts: 8890 | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Mr. Cat ....Apology accepted. One point, if you are going to look at DD on individuals, I kick myself and you should also kick yourself at the DD on Rufus and Ben. Both have dark backgrounds. Hopefully this ridiculous CSHD story ends with a "happy ending". By the way, as I said in my other message to you; you have a right to believe in whomever you want to ....without my questioning your purpose. I respect your opinion. Posts: 557 | From: UpState New York | Registered: Sep 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Cat ...... One more thing .... I think that your idea about Sabra being a major player in this scam has much merit. I also believe that she will be exposed for her part in this in the near future.
Posts: 557 | From: UpState New York | Registered: Sep 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by thedoctor: Mr. Cat ....Apology accepted. One point, if you are going to look at DD on individuals, I kick myself and you should also kick yourself at the DD on Rufus and Ben. Both have dark backgrounds. Hopefully this ridiculous CSHD story ends with a "happy ending".
Doc, i totally agree with what you are saying about Rufus and Ben. FWIW at least Rufus and Ben tried to explain their past, Arlitt hid behind an alias until it was too late.
If i were to kick myself it would be for NOT selling every share at at 4000% gain regardless of who is who. I sold enough shares and flipped some more to make me happy but it still burns me that people are getting away with CRIME! Im not P'd off because i feel i got screwed...i did ok, im P'd off because ive met friends along the way that bought in at $1, $2, $3..whatever and have watched their portfolios shrink MASSIVELY. Its truly sad.
Thanks for accepting the apology......i felt like an azz
Posts: 2308 | From: Michigan | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Jenna: wv1973 & others....have I missed something? I thought that by us having a proxy vote coming with things to vote on means that life maybe slowly coming back.....If we vote to separate the company from the bonds & Rufus....then doesn't that mean they have complied with the SEC & the company gets to move on? This is how I understood it.....wouldn't this mean the proxy vote would be the begining of the end but also the start of something new?
Correct me if I'm wrong.......
Between personal situations taking more and more of my time and also attempting to let what I heard the other night sink in and mull around in my brain for a while, I haven't posted about Rufus on SPR until now.,
Remember that everything I'm commenting on is soley based on what Rufus stated and therefore is only one side of the story. Where the truth lies is anyone's guess.
According to Rufus the 6-1 is still in play and would be issued to stockholders of record, I believe on the 16th of October. He was asked and stated that even those who had sold after the 16th would receive them. Remember that Arlitt also Pr'ed that the 6-1 would be honored. At least they agree on something.
My understanding of the proxy is that it would be for the shareholders to vote on a plan first withdraw the PR's and other filings pertaining to the bonds, the issue that the SEC is most concerned with. After doing this the company would then be able to move forward with new assests of $52M, that has already been arranged. Rufus and the bonds would continue the federal court case and SEC action seperately. Any positive outcome from the court system would benefit the shareholders. Also the proxy would be for installing new officers of the company. Who and how was not explained. According to RUfus this will happen within the next 2-4 weeks. He maintains that he is the true CEO of Conversion Solutions.
Personally, I have no idea if this will happen or not. I do know, as most here already know that a power struggle is underway. THe shareholders are being told that each of the individuals is trying to help the shareholders. I disagree. I do think someone is trying to save the company and the shareholders but that the other faction is attempting to hide their involvement in whatever SCAM was perpetrated. The easiest way to do that of course is to control the company, it's documents and information. I'm not going to attempt to figure out who is who. I just don't have enough Information to make that determination.
IMO. The one dot that connects through this whole scenario is Sabra. She Knew Mike, she brought the bonds to the company. Her involvement is key.
Will this company survive? It's really hard to say. It does appear that the consensus from Rufus, Arlitt and Alexander is that in order for the company to move forward, new funding is neccessary. If, and this is a big IF, the company moves forward it will not be the company we once thought of. The $15 a share is out the window. This was all based on a company with billions in assests and now best case scenario would be $52M.
IMO, we are still months away from anything truely positive happening if it is going to happen and maybe years away from finding out who the true culprits are and any type of resolution that might come.
Anyone who claims we are "Golden", is filling your minds with "Fool's Gold", it looks like the real thing but ends up being worthless.
This board for the most part has been one of the most even keel boards out there. THe true pumpers used HSM and the Bashers used IHUB. I have respect for many that have and continue to post here and hope that we can avoid the disintegration of the relationships and goodwill that has developed over the past months.
GLTA Wally
Posts: 3255 | From: Los Angeles California | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by St. Matthew: Well said Wally...thanks
Yea, and he didnt even insult anyone in the process. I could use some Wally pointers. Posts: 2308 | From: Michigan | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
So I wonder what the 50+ million in assets Rufus has lined up. What if they are bonds? Will the SEC let a new CSHD (or whatever) move ahead with them?
My other big question is, if we do separate from Rufus and the bonds and the SEC finds that everything is fine (or maybe just that those bonds aren't, but the others are), will we (the new company) get those assets back?
posted
Ok, im sure this is going WAY out on a limb here but does anyone have the original FHAL M N 1 interviews on MP3?
If i recall there were 3 (4 actually but i think its one interview cut in half). The first one was just Mike and he mostly talked about the "Loadsource" trucking software and the purchase of the new trucks. The last 2 were regarding the merger with CVSU. The one I cant seem to find was the second one. Im almost 100% certain that the interview was with Mike and a guy from CEOTA (possibly Gordon Brown). During the interview I recall that either Mike or Randy Mosely had some sort of business relationship with this CEOTA guy for years which basically got them the contract without much hassle.
Ok, the reason i bring this up is now the word on the street is that CEOTA is bogus. I kinda suspected this all along and was actually the first red flag that i blindly ignored. If CEOTA is bogus i wonder who the guy was in the interview on M N 1. I would LOVE to get my hands on that second interview, last i checked it was not available on M N 1's site Posts: 2308 | From: Michigan | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by milliam: So I wonder what the 50+ million in assets Rufus has lined up. What if they are bonds? Will the SEC let a new CSHD (or whatever) move ahead with them?
My other big question is, if we do separate from Rufus and the bonds and the SEC finds that everything is fine (or maybe just that those bonds aren't, but the others are), will we (the new company) get those assets back?
Crazy stuff indeed!
Thats a very good question. It would be quite ironic if we seperate ourselves from Rufus and the bonds and everything turns out to be legit. My guess is we would be struggling like BBAN and Rufus will be out looking for a new shell.
Milliam.....there is really no need to put those thoughts in my head Posts: 2308 | From: Michigan | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Mr. CATIAEngineer: Ok, im sure this is going WAY out on a limb here but does anyone have the original FHAL M N 1 interviews on MP3?
If i recall there were 3 (4 actually but i think its one interview cut in half). The first one was just Mike and he mostly talked about the "Loadsource" trucking software and the purchase of the new trucks. The last 2 were regarding the merger with CVSU. The one I cant seem to find was the second one. Im almost 100% certain that the interview was with Mike and a guy from CEOTA (possibly Gordon Brown). During the interview I recall that either Mike or Randy Mosely had some sort of business relationship with this CEOTA guy for years which basically got them the contract without much hassle.
Ok, the reason i bring this up is now the word on the street is that CEOTA is bogus. I kinda suspected this all along and was actually the first red flag that i blindly ignored. If CEOTA is bogus i wonder who the guy was in the interview on M N 1. I would LOVE to get my hands on that second interview, last i checked it was not available on M N 1's site
Can't help you with the tape but DO remember the interview exactly as you stated. In fact it was just prior to that interview that I bought FHAL. I also remember them stating that the contracts were done but because of the world cup the whole country was on siesta. That it would be done within the next week. I almost sold for a small loss but then the Reverse Merger was PR'ed.
Prior to the merger it was never my intent to hold FHAL. it was strictly a News Momo play that I had planned to exit at 35% profit. Sounded to risky to me. The whole line of them not being able to get anything done because of World Cup was a Red Flag for me. It's the same as saying that no business is conducted in the U.S. during the World Series, March Madness or the Super Bowl week. I found it ridiculous.
GLTA Wally
Posts: 3255 | From: Los Angeles California | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Yea i remember the World Cup thing too but i didnt get the red flag. I work for an international company with Germans, Mexicans and British in the same office with me. During the World Cup almost our entire office was in the lunchroom with a projector playing the game on the wall....true story. When i saw that the whole "Brazilian govt stopped working thing" kinda made more sense to me. Posts: 2308 | From: Michigan | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I am sorry if this is a stupid question, but why are there people fighting over the CEO position of a "scam" company? We are on the "greys". Why not just walk away?
I don't know who to believe, Rufus or John. I may be wrong, but if this company was worth nothing, because it's a scam, than why all the fighting?
This is a sincere question so I would love a sincere answer.
Oh, and Milliam, I am just catching up so I just wanted to let you know that it Japan that bombed Pearl Harbor. Posts: 105 | From: utah | Registered: Aug 2006
| IP: Logged |
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
![[Frown]](frown.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
