quote:Originally posted by 10of13: Not often...BUT? if the SEC lifts the suspension? Wouldn't that give a fairly good indication that all was "good and real"? IMO..
quote:Originally posted by 3403: Do compainies usually come out of a SEC halt whole and healthy?
Actually that is what the hearing this tuesday is all about, they have to show just cause to not be shut down. If they arent shut down, then they are vindicated and have proven the bonds are theirs.
Posts: 440 | Registered: Jul 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by TexasMoney: Oh, come on sceptor don't be bitter. You'll be able to buy back this week.
ummmm. Are you sure you have been following this discussion? Or are you just queing off of keywords?
quote:Originally posted by TexasMoney:
quote:Originally posted by sceptor:
quote:Originally posted by TexasMoney: Sceptor -
I'll ask again what NONE of you bashing, one-dimensional shorts can't or won't answer.
When and how have Rufus, Mike Alexander, Sabra Dabbs, and Ben Stanley benefited financially from this purporte fraud? It's only one question and its a pretty simple one.
Good luck answering it and be careful not to embarass yourself
You do realize I'm not a basher right?
I'm not sure why I picked out your name. Feel free to copy and paste the question to the appropriate person(s). Its one that drives them insane!
quote:Originally posted by TexasMoney: Oh, come on sceptor don't be bitter. You'll be able to buy back this week.
Texas ... I think Sceptor was saying positive things about CSHD.
I was. I need to post in greater depth I guess. Texas, go look at my post to him now. I included the ticker symbol of the stock he pumped in here this morning. That should clear it up for you.
Posts: 440 | Registered: Jul 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
LOL - I'm watching the Cowboy game right now so no I have no idea what I'm talking about. Posts: 386 | From: Plano, TX | Registered: Oct 2006
| IP: Logged |
Member Rated: posted November 05, 2006 16:48 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Giants won again...I've got tix for next Sunday against Da Bears!
Go Giants! -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Posts: 16 | From: NYC | Registered: Oct 2006 | IP: Logged |
Redskin Fan GO BEARS
Posts: 83 | Registered: Mar 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by voyager1951: I guess I'm learning that dd means something different to everyone. An infamous person once said "it depends on what your definition of "is" is."
The latest story posted by Webb. Take the story paragraph by paragraph since it seems it is a chronological sequence of events. Is it inaccurate -- not because the site is a rag or the reporter is a known basher -- but is it inaccurate?
If the answer is yes, then what evidence is there to refute those statements -- remember opinions of the rag and reporter aside? Also, individual ideas, speculation, conjecture and conspiracy theories to spin a yarn good enough for soap opera tv cannot be considered "good" dd. It is trying to turn a negative into a positive w/o fact.
So, in reality, you are left with company-filed documents -- unaudited and audited (which is questionable) -- statements made in public, on radio and over the telephone (I have noticed -- although I may have missed them if so please repost) -- that not once did anyone post an official email from one of the officers, and the internal belief that these are true.
RPH had a checkered past but for some reason(s) many on this board overlooked those events and explained them away. My bad for not doing that dd. Like 3403 I failed in that area.
So, sceptor, I assume you did dd on the company assets. I would assume you believed the company-produced documents. That's all anyone could do if you have the internal need or belief that they were true. With the amount of back pedaling on these posts, a number here are starting to question the 8k and 10k validity as well. I can see by the number of speculations on this board on how this will play out -- many are now attempting to pave the way for a longer battle with a positive spin.
The one thing I can say positive on many on this board is that you have missed your calling -- you could be best-selling fiction novelists.
V-Ger, A standard in any industry that requires any sort of research is that, once a source of information is found to be biased or flawed, it is no longer used as a resource. You don't continue sifting for the few bits of truth in the lie. You leave yourself open to consistantly being challenged, and, in most cases, just plan being wrong.
-------------------- Stay strong! Stay long! Posts: 69 | From: Portland, OR | Registered: Oct 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by voyager1951: I guess I'm learning that dd means something different to everyone. An infamous person once said "it depends on what your definition of "is" is."
The latest story posted by Webb. Take the story paragraph by paragraph since it seems it is a chronological sequence of events. Is it inaccurate -- not because the site is a rag or the reporter is a known basher -- but is it inaccurate?
If the answer is yes, then what evidence is there to refute those statements -- remember opinions of the rag and reporter aside? Also, individual ideas, speculation, conjecture and conspiracy theories to spin a yarn good enough for soap opera tv cannot be considered "good" dd. It is trying to turn a negative into a positive w/o fact.
So, in reality, you are left with company-filed documents -- unaudited and audited (which is questionable) -- statements made in public, on radio and over the telephone (I have noticed -- although I may have missed them if so please repost) -- that not once did anyone post an official email from one of the officers, and the internal belief that these are true.
RPH had a checkered past but for some reason(s) many on this board overlooked those events and explained them away. My bad for not doing that dd. Like 3403 I failed in that area.
So, sceptor, I assume you did dd on the company assets. I would assume you believed the company-produced documents. That's all anyone could do if you have the internal need or belief that they were true. With the amount of back pedaling on these posts, a number here are starting to question the 8k and 10k validity as well. I can see by the number of speculations on this board on how this will play out -- many are now attempting to pave the way for a longer battle with a positive spin.
The one thing I can say positive on many on this board is that you have missed your calling -- you could be best-selling fiction novelists.
V-Ger, A standard in any industry that requires any sort of research is that, once a source of information is found to be biased or flawed, it is no longer used as a resource. You don't continue sifting for the few bits of truth in the lie. You leave yourself open to consistantly being challenged, and, in most cases, just plan being wrong.
You go ahead and use logic on him, I'll stick with the rolled up newspapers. Posts: 440 | Registered: Jul 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
just looking at the cvsu website, are they updating the site again ?? when you go to the site and scroll down past the quotemedia I do not remember all the articles at the bottom. about moving to nasdaq soon it all looks new to me... thoughts??
Posts: 180 | From: Grants Pass , Or | Registered: Sep 2006
| IP: Logged |
REPOST: Lets take a break from the character assassination and look at something interesting. Some of you may have already seen this, but I think its worth revisiting. Remember Penn, Davis and McFarland? An asset mamangement co. with $300 million in big board stocks. Check out out the holdings report list and who do you see?
Now, I don't know about you guys, but it gives me a warm fuzzy feeling that an institution that NEVER buys penny stocks, has bought CSHD. Comments?[/quote]
First time poster.
One interesting point, is that they just bought the stock recently; it doesn't show up on their previous ownership report. So it's not like they're a leftover FrontHaul shareholder or anything like tht.
Posts: 6410 | Registered: Jul 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by atthebank: just looking at the cvsu website, are they updating the site again ?? when you go to the site and scroll down past the quotemedia I do not remember all the articles at the bottom. about moving to nasdaq soon it all looks new to me... thoughts??
Athebank I don't remember that either.
Posts: 6410 | Registered: Jul 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Quote: Originally Posted by ALady in the House Did you know the sec did not have a access [of their own] to look at the Euroclear bonds?They had to call someone from somewhere alse. DID you know that Rufus offer them[his not the company]but his personal one. So they could take a look. Rufus doesn't mind dogs, He likes them. Things aren't the way they seem, we all know that.
Posts: 6410 | Registered: Jul 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I think it's been there...I remember reading it... Curious as to why Mike isn't listed on the directors page?
quote:Originally posted by a surfer:
quote:Originally posted by atthebank: just looking at the cvsu website, are they updating the site again ?? when you go to the site and scroll down past the quotemedia I do not remember all the articles at the bottom. about moving to nasdaq soon it all looks new to me... thoughts??
Athebank I don't remember that either.
-------------------- #1 Rule: Protect your capital! #2 Rule: Never fall for the BS on the boards! Posts: 8890 | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
JOHN S. MCFARLAND was CEO of Peppertree, one of those vacation condo companies. merged with http://www.equivest.com/ and appears to subsequently have become Cendant Timeshare Resort Group, Inc. (CTRG) which changed its name to Wyndham Vacation Ownership, Inc.
not a bad end merger, nice new parent company, nice 200mil a year earnings.
quote:Originally posted by a surfer: Something from HSM.
REPOST: Lets take a break from the character assassination and look at something interesting. Some of you may have already seen this, but I think its worth revisiting. Remember Penn, Davis and McFarland? An asset mamangement co. with $300 million in big board stocks. Check out out the holdings report list and who do you see?
Now, I don't know about you guys, but it gives me a warm fuzzy feeling that an institution that NEVER buys penny stocks, has bought CSHD. Comments?
First time poster.
One interesting point, is that they just bought the stock recently; it doesn't show up on their previous ownership report. So it's not like they're a leftover FrontHaul shareholder or anything like tht.
Posts: 2651 | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by 10of13: Not often...BUT? if the SEC lifts the suspension? Wouldn't that give a fairly good indication that all was "good and real"? IMO..
quote:Originally posted by 3403: Do compainies usually come out of a SEC halt whole and healthy?
could be or not, SSTY was suspended and the suspension was lifted, that was months ago and it is still not being quoted, only trades on grey sheets. same with GRYF suspension was lifted MANY moths ago,( of course THAT pos WAS a scam, no doubt about it! ) not quoted - trades on grey sheets, BCIT also the same i think?. if MM`s issue quotes on this after the suspension is lifted THEN i will be EXTREMELY happy with this. THAT to me would indicate that our worst fears are false and all IS well and good. if that happens LOAD UP!!! Posts: 2503 | From: connecticut | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Violations to the merger agreement... the merger could be called off. Maybe.. interesting language.
Posts: 228 | From: Denver | Registered: Oct 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Simon is confused by the shareholders erasing the BOD. That Mike currently is the only member of the board and can elect as he see's fit. Is Ben in the picture? Is Sabre in the Picture?
Lots of interesting questions...
Posts: 228 | From: Denver | Registered: Oct 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Simon contemplating that all the terms of the merger agreement may be up in the air.. no 6:1 no $15 reset... He doesnt know where it is going.
Posts: 228 | From: Denver | Registered: Oct 2006
| IP: Logged |
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Eek!]](eek.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
