hey repo, yes, this is the POS PIA stock that was supposed to be at $15 after the merger, that the company just keeps adding "asset announcements" to, and if you could tell us if the merger is definately "completely complete" or what the holdup is, or give us a definitive answer as to whether the deal is or isn't going to happen you could save us all a lotta time. tia
~BB
quote:Originally posted by cool AZ: Rufus is not available yet ... the babe hasn't wakened him up! LOL
quote:Originally posted by imapoorcollegestudent: Let's get togather some questions for a phone call. One I've been wanting to know about is the amount of form 144's filed. Why so many. And does this have anything to do with the price reset date??? Also are we working with a Market Maker to make the transition smooth and with little manipulation during the price reset? Ima
I've done a bit of research on the 144's. You will find a number of the names on the 144's from the 10K's filed by Furia and Fronthaul. Doesn't have anything to do with CSHD.
quote:Originally posted by usedtobeaCRab: The funny thing is...75k were submitted by the Holly Springs Baptist Church...now if someone wants they could call and bug the church and maybe get some info out of them? is that wrong?
posted
BB...I'd post the whole list if I could...I use the Etrade Pro platform and that is where I get the list...unfortunatly though...it will not allow me to copy and paste...
for some reason the Nasdaq site never has the entire list either...
IP: Logged |
posted
Did we figure out who this Bartholomew character was? Is it more crap from OurStreet? IMO…he pumped it up and made a profit and then bashed it down so he could make more money in hopes of buying more shares. Just a thought.
-------------------- "If you go the Extra Mile there will be no Traffic Jams".
quote:Originally posted by Repoman75: My stars are unaffected at this point... stuck at 2. And thanks for NOT answering my questions... first sign of a cult. I'm outta here.
I don't like the way he worded this, but I think his point was that it's very difficult for this board to pay any attention to people who are not in this "group". I have also asked questions that almost always go ignored. Not slamming anyone here, but there is some truth to what he says. I'm new to this and probably ask some questions sometimes that may be lame to some of you, but I only ask them if I can't come up with the answer myself. I have a lot of respect for MANY of you in this group. There's no doubt that there is a lot of talent here, but sometimes reaching out to new people would be nice.
Sorry, not trying to slam, cut-down or bash anyone or anything here, just I see the same thing at times. GLTA
He's not new. He asks snide questions to be a smart azz. It's just that we have DD'd this thing to death... unless it's new and verifiable fact, we chalk it up to manipulation. It's a kind of believe it if you want at this point... and would help to read all of the pages in this thread. It is difficult for us to refernce past work as we are tired.
Who wants to read 40 pages of posts, especially when 3/4 are cheerleading, pumping, cult activities, etc.??? Give the summation!
40?..did you say 40? lol... well over 400 buddy.
Oh, and welcome back...thought you left.
Oh, there is a 5,000 share cost for summation. Send your certs first ...then we'll talk.
-------------------- - "Pay it Forward"
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Repoman75: Thank you. I do come off snide because I am blunt. I don't have time to try to sell you steak knives for information. Give me what I ask and I won't hang around bashing.
With that said, see you all at $54.
Well, just try to remember this little fact...
We don't work for you.
-------------------- - "Pay it Forward"
IP: Logged |
posted
What are you guys thoughts on this TUT guy? I had heard of him on the IHUB board and people talk about him as if he is the prophet. I gotta say...it would be great if this was true.
Originally Posted by Tutankhamen Listen up carefully everyone. I just finished talking with the "source" and I apologize but I won't mention names. Everything is still going to be exactly like it was said but even better. They are aware of what has been happening in the short camp and the 10k is coming but when it comes everyone will find it is even better than any of you can imagine including price reset. From what I know now everyone who is holding stock will be doing even better than they hoped and it will happen. I also understand that there will be people going to jail over what they have tried to do to against Conversion.
Today the shorts have gotten the most desperate in a number of attempts because they know they are about to be choked. I will now repeat this again, if you think your day trading doesn't help the shorts you are wrong. If you believe in this company the best you can do is be firm and don't give them even an inch of breathing room right now before the 10k hits and it will hit very quickly. Do your part if you believe in this company because with or without you it will happen and those lucky enough to have stuck it out will be the winners.
There will be those that will argue for day trading telling you I don't know what I am talking about. When you finally do know who I am then you will know that I know exactly what I am talking about.
"The Pharaoh’s curse will come to pass. Those that stand before me will live. Those that stand with their backs to me will perish".
-------------------- "If you go the Extra Mile there will be no Traffic Jams".
quote:Originally posted by Repoman75: Thank you. I do come off snide because I am blunt. I don't have time to try to sell you steak knives for information. Give me what I ask and I won't hang around bashing.
With that said, see you all at $54.
Well, just try to remember this little fact...
We don't work for you.
A little kindness, respect, and active participation would be welcome, eh?
On May 5, 2005, Furia issued a total of 798,750 shares of restricted common stock to the following persons:
Name No. of Shares Dan Traxler 75,000 Bryan Hawkins 90,000 Terry Carrow 18,750 Marty Reneau 37,500 John B Enriquez 37,500 Kathy Robinson 37,500 Lane Barton 75,000 Ruben Duron 15,000 Shawn Duron 7,500 Marcus Duron 15,000 Marciano Duron 22,500 Rene Duron 15,000 Christina Duron 7,500 Joseph Emond 37,500 Kent Phillips 75,000 Olan Woodard Jr 37,500 Ralph W Hites 37.500 Micheal F Phillips 150,000 David Hawkins 7,500 Kevin Carmona 7,500 Daniel Pedroza 7,500 Joe Piazza 22,500
On May 14, 2005, Furia issued a total of 75,000 shares of restricted common stock to the following persons:
Name No. of Shares Michael Wayne Reynolds 37,500 James P Gee 37,500
On May 30, 2005, Furia issued a total of 37,500 shares of restricted common stock to the following persons:
Name No. of Shares Kelsey E Cranford 18,750 Callie R Cranford 18,750
On June 3, 2005, Furia issued a total of 606,900 shares of restricted common stock to the following persons:
Name No. of Shares Aaron Singer 15,000 Billy Seiler 37,500 Adolfo Perez 21,000 John B Enriquez 7,500 James P. Gee 50,000 Stewart Buckalew 7,500 Tamara Templeton 11,250 Mike Hammer 200,000 Tim Ludwig 52,500 Malcolm Coffee 18,750 Bryan Hawkins 100,000 John Gonzales 7,500 Greg Aslinger 10,000 Morris Duree 45,000 Dana Duree 15,000 Greg Fruss 900 Casey Knoble 7,500
On June 6, 2005, Furia issued a total of 1,040,000 shares of restricted common stock to the following persons:
Name No. of Shares Greg Aslinger 65,000 Eddy Knapp 975,000
On June 13, 2005, Furia issued a total of 90,000 shares of restricted common stock to Juan Fernandez.
On June 16, 2005, Furia issued a total of 200,000 shares of restricted common stock to M. N. Osborne.
IP: Logged |
posted
I've been feeling that way for a couple weeks BB...so many coincidences...so few REAL holes...something is/has happening/happened...we're just kinda along for the ride...
IP: Logged |
posted
OK, im gonna take a guess here... and i hope i am right!
Since Michael Hammer's Form 144 was filed via Merrill in London, then perhaps he is this guy...
Dr. Michael Hammer is the driving force behind the business process revolution. He is the originator of both reengineering and the process enterprise, concepts that have changed forever how businesses around the world do business. Thousands of companies have turned his ideas into practice and profit.
Dr. Hammer is the author of four books, including the international best-seller Reengineering the Corporation, which Forbes ranked as one of the three most important business books of the past twenty years. His latest book is The Agenda: What Every Business Must Do to Dominate the Decade. His articles have appeared in periodicals from Harvard Business Review to The Economist, and his work has been featured in every major business publication.
An engineer by training, Dr. Hammer’s research and teachings focus on how to transform business operations; his work is relentlessly pragmatic and immediately applicable. Dr. Hammer was for many years a professor of computer science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, and he is currently a visiting Professor at MIT and a Fellow at Oxford University. He is a founder of several high-technology companies, and he was named by Time as one of America’s twenty-five most influential individuals.
now that would actually make some SENSE - especially given Wally's previous "reasons why someone would have restricted shares"
and it would be some pretty dern awesome news...
--------------------------
now, let's connect the church into the picture: (yeah, this is ironic)
A Whole New Way . . . Don’t Automate, Obliterate
In the early 1990’s, Dr. Michael Hammer touched off an entire wave of reengineering work with his July 1990 Harvard Business Review article titled: Reengineering Work: Don’t Automate, Obliterate. There were many, many consulting practices in the private and public sectors built on the concepts Dr. Hammer wrote about. However, as I get further and further into the church market, I am beginning to think that the reengineering wave that hit the commercial industry passed over the churches.
Too often, as we learn more about a church during a systems implementation and we ask why a church staff person does a particular process, the response is, “because we have always done it that way.” Or, when we ask why a church wants to create a new process, the logic is simply, “that’s the way I think it should be done” without looking at the implications to the congregation or volunteer that may be affected most. Hammer’s contention is that we should eliminate unnecessary processes or steps if what they accomplish is redundant, burdensome or immaterial.
I believe that a common example is (I am stepping out on a limb here not to offend, but to prompt discussion) when a children’s pastor believes an automated check-out process is required for the Children’s service on Sunday. I always like to ask, “Do you ever have children left over after the service?” And “If you do, will ‘automated check out’ eliminate those children left behind?” ;-) Or “Is it important to know exactly when a child checked out?” And if so, “What will be done with that information?” Other questions might be, “Do the parents think it is essential to have ‘the system’ check out the kids?” or "Is the time stamp valuable?”.
What must be taken into account is the time (inconvenience to parents – stewardship of time) and equipment (costs - stewardship of money) required to efficiently and effectively provide an automated ‘check-out’ process for children. For a church with multiple services, is the equipment for check-in and check-out the same? Are the parents checking in for the next service colliding with the parents checking out from the previous service because they are trying to use the same kiosks? Are we contributing to the chaos of the situation? For what purpose?
Checking out children for a “play school”, where the billing of time is important, is a must. Checking out volunteers so that the actual time contributed as service can also be helpful, if that is reported and is part of the “thank you” for tracking volunteers. So do not mistake my comments to think that all automated check out is unnecessary. Sometimes, it can be useful, but each situation must be examined for its own merit.
The overall point is to examine your processes. Take a whole new look at the “whys” and “hows” something is done and try to eliminate all that is unnecessary. What is left should definitely be automated, but first ask what value the deliverable really provides.
posted
I like BB's find better than mine. Maybe that website shows all the 144's filed for Hammer, Micheal...no matter if they are the same person or not. I hope so...BB's Mike Hammer seems like a better person to be a fellow shareholder with.
IP: Logged |
posted
Sooooo..... a religous right, Republican financial wizard trying to make some money funding Gov. contracts to support the military in a fight against terror?
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
![[Eek!]](eek.gif)
