quote:Originally posted by milliam: I think the bashers are pushing the filing for today because we're all pretty sure it won't happen. They just up the anticipation by saying its going to happen and then some of the mindless ones start thinking its got to happen, and then when it doesn't...they sale, the pps tanks...you know the scenario.
quote:Originally posted by Peaser: If the newly hired auditor quits, run fer da hills IMO. How long will the audit process take place?
Peaser...I emailed the "new Auditor"...He claims that it will be done by the 30th...as long as there are no snags...he works for the state of Michigan...I'm hopin' that he will be on the "up and up"...
I hope that you kept a few shares from when you were trading it early on...
-------------------- #1 Rule: Protect your capital! #2 Rule: Never fall for the BS on the boards!
IP: Logged |
posted
I believe some people have already emailed the new auditor and he has stated that the audit has to be completed by the 30th of Sep and he is well aware of the deadline. He is a very reputable CPA according to the DD on this board. I would be very suprised if we have much longer to wait. JMO
-------------------- Success is having the time and money to enjoy all of life's wonders...
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Peaser: Hoping the best for ya 10.
What intrigues me is why the other auditors actually quit.
It's all been speculation so far.
No shares held here.
That is a big load of speculation right there. Show us proof!
On May 18, 2006 Murrell, Hall, McIntosh & Co., PLLP, the auditors, of The Fronthaul Group, Inc. (the "Registrant") resigned as the Registrant's independent auditors. Murrell, Hall, McIntosh & Co., PLLP did not seek the Registrant's consent to its resignation. Therefore, Murrell, Hall, McIntosh & Co., PLLP's decision to resign was not recommended or approved by the Registrant's Board of Directors.
posted
well then the company would be lying, since they said it was an amicable parting in regards to the previus auditor.
it was in the PR or something wasnt it? anyone have that?
On September 8, 2006, the Company executed an engagement letter with Thomas Benson, Certified Public Accountant of 4599 Mistywood Drive Okemos MI 48664 to audit the consolidated financial statements of the Company for its fiscal year ending June 30, 2006, and the related statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for the year then ending. The Board of Directors approved the appointment of Thomas Benson, effective September 8, 2006.
There are no disagreements between the Registrant and the prior appointed C.P.A. David S. Hall, P.C., located at 100 Crescent Court, suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75201, on any matters of accounting principals or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreement(s), if not resolved to the satisfaction of the former accountant would cause it to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement(s) in connection with its reports.
IP: Logged |
posted
Let's see I have a known basher who admittedly states he has no "interest" saying,
quote: What intrigues me is why the other auditors actually quit.
and I have a document filed with the SEC that saying,
quote: There are no disagreements between the Registrant and the prior appointed C.P.A. David S. Hall, P.C., located at 100 Crescent Court, suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75201, on any matters of accounting principals or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreement(s), if not resolved to the satisfaction of the former accountant would cause it to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreement(s) in connection with its reports.
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm who to believe.
Everyone make sure to mind your sources very carefully. People are willing to say anything to scare you from your shares.
The thing with the "old" FHAL Accountants...that was with, and for FHAL...this is a new "group" of people in this now...I would assume that since FHAL is being "absorbed" they would get a new auditor...nothing seems questionable to me...at least...not about the auditor...
-------------------- #1 Rule: Protect your capital! #2 Rule: Never fall for the BS on the boards!
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by 10of13: Nah Tax... Peaser doesn't want our shares...he uses ameritrade...he can't buy them...
The thing with the "old" FHAL Accountants...that was with, and for FHAL...this is a new "group" of people in this now...I would assume that since FHAL is being "absorbed" they would get a new auditor...nothing seems questionable to me...at least...not about the auditor...
True, that is one possibility to the auditor story. I only wish we all had a solid answer for it.
We are all speculating on the reasoning for the new auditor.
posted
Sure couldn't... your DD is lacking, and you are doing nothing but trying to add confusion to an area this board and it's DD have previously cleared. You quote an 8K that was filed by Micheal Alexander CEO of Fronthaul prior to this reverse merger, and you ask a question that is answered in the 8K it self.
"The former accountant reasons for resigning were the 10-QSB for the quarter ending March 31, 2006 was filed prior to their completion of their review and that the Company's purchase of its common stock violated certain loan covenants and were not properly disclosed to the public."
So the accountant didn't complete the audit and had purchased shares of Fronthaul creating a "conflict of interest".
So I guess that leaves...
quote: Could I be wrong? Sure could.
You sir are laughable and you and your weak DD is looking pretty Ihub-ish. LOL
posted
not the same company anymore. Tax it was only a matter of time we were going to have to start dealing with this in our little utopian society lol
posted
That the auditor quit because Fronthaul (who no longer exists) violated loan convenants? I cant remember that an explaination was given but maybe i missed that.
Anyway, Rufus has allegedly made enough mistakes along the way...quit adding to it by blaming him for Fronthauls problems.
IP: Logged |