Thread Closed  Topic Closed
  Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board
  Micro Penny Stocks, Penny Stocks Under $0.10
  CMKX IV New Thread....GOT IT - HOLDIN' IT (Page 21)

Post New Topic  
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!
This topic is 45 pages long:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45 
next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   CMKX IV New Thread....GOT IT - HOLDIN' IT
VNGNTN1
Member
posted July 23, 2004 18:53     Click Here to See the Profile for VNGNTN1     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
RICHNESS
A couple days ago I asked for a good pic !
Still waiting include something we can checkout.
VAN

IP: Logged

Money_Penny
Member
posted July 23, 2004 18:57     Click Here to See the Profile for Money_Penny     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Allright, John, I admit I still have less than you (2.5 million) . But my kids own about another 1.5 million, does that count, LOL. I feel good though about buying at 0.0004 today. It was a sale indeed!

IP: Logged

Upside
Member
posted July 23, 2004 18:58     Click Here to See the Profile for Upside     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Van,
Could be he's not comfortable making picks. I know I'm not anymore. My last one was DCUT at .10 a few months back and today it sits at .006. How's that for a pick? I hate to see people invest in something I recommend only to get wiped out.

IP: Logged

will
Member
posted July 23, 2004 19:03     Click Here to See the Profile for will     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Here's a pick, PRIM @ .0008, if/when it goes to to .0004, buy more.

quote:
Originally posted by Upside:
Van,
Could be he's not comfortable making picks. I know I'm not anymore. My last one was DCUT at .10 a few months back and today it sits at .006. How's that for a pick? I hate to see people invest in something I recommend only to get wiped out.

IP: Logged

will
Member
posted July 23, 2004 19:05     Click Here to See the Profile for will     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
UpMan, I think Van was asking for a photo of the scab on the ass of humanity.

IP: Logged

richnessforeveryon3
Member
posted July 23, 2004 19:07     Click Here to See the Profile for richnessforeveryon3     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by VNGNTN1:
RICHNESS
A couple days ago I asked for a good pic !
Still waiting include something we can checkout.
VAN

SPCK (SUPERCLICK)

IP: Logged

Upside
Member
posted July 23, 2004 19:15     Click Here to See the Profile for Upside     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
originally posted by will:
quote:
UpMan, I think Van was asking for a photo of the scab on the ass of humanity.

Got a nasty one on my leg, that's the best I can do!

IP: Logged

Brad
Member
posted July 23, 2004 19:42     Click Here to See the Profile for Brad     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I've been on a plane all day which, by the looks of what transpired on this board, is a good thing. I'm not happy to see richness back again either (especially since he said "OK ENOUGH IS ENOUGH....I LEAVE") but it's not my job to police him or others. I'll leave it to the moderators. So in an attempt to get us back on a CMKX track on this board I'm back to posting some interesting posts and other info I can find on CMKX.

--------------------------------------------

***********
** PART I **
***********

MY JEFF/Urban/Naked Short theory:

First, we need to go back about a year:

1) Jul/03 - CMKM files "Certification and Notice of Termination of Registration" Form 15-12G with SEC. CMKM becomes a non-reporting company.

- What does this mean? Well, for one it could have been a ploy by Urban to cover up heavy dilution, and insider option/warrant grants and thus make this one of the largest pump & dumps in pink sheet history. Personally, I don’t believe that Urban could perpetrate such a scheme and have the bravado to have personal meetings with shareholders, advertise the company through a racing team, and get one of the top Securities firms on board. IMO, it was for another purpose…to disguise his actions from the MMs or hedge funds he believed were naked shorting this and in doing so brought it down to the .0001 x .0002

2) Aug/03 - CMKM announces share dividend payout for CMI.
Aug/03 - CMKM announces 2 for 1 foward stock split.

Urban’s first attempts at reconciling the Naked Short position…either there was none at the time or they completed disregarded the CMI dividend and their obligation to either obtain CMI shares or cover CMKM shares.
This is where the trading begins to get interesting, especially the volume…looking at a 2 year chart we see that beginning the end of August/Early September 2003 trading volume picks up immensely and not just because of the 2 for 1 split. It goes from 100’s of millions to billions of shares traded every day.

3)
Sept/03 - CMKM announces six billion shares are being retired back to treasury.
Nov/03 - CMKM announces over twenty billion shares have been retired back to treasury to date.
Dec/03 - CMKM announces 16.5 billion shares officially retired to treasury.

September is exactly the time that the volume picks up…probably because of all these shares being returned to the treasury. Now if the volume suddenly surged from millions to billions and its all buy volume (the company buying back its stock) then how come the price of the stock went down to NO BID x .0001 ?

Urban thinks to himself - what the hell is going on here? I’m buying tons and tons of this stock and the price is going down?

Now Urban being experienced in the market, and probably having friends who deal in securities starts to realize what’s going on…His stock is being cellar boxed by offshore hedge funds naked shorting it like crazy(thinking it will go bankrupt, underestimating the company and the FALC region).
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=2543926

It is around this time that Urban starts to concoct a plan…start buying the naked shorts, pull certs, and return them to the treasury(thus the buy backs in November/Deceember). He probably uses a MM to do this…And that MM was most likely JEFF. People who have been in this stock for a while remember JEFF being a large net buyer over the last year at the basement level(.0001)

The dilution issue: If you believe that Urban used this time to dilute than he was doing it while he was retiring shares…a little counter intuitive and if proven is grounds for showing that he in fact manipulated this stock by releasing info about a buyback while diluted this stock into oblivion. Thus, if this was proven I’d call this a scam and Urban a scam artist. BUT, I do not believe this happened because 1) I think Urban is a fairly respectable person(from what others have said) and 2) he could make a lot more money from concocting a plan to elicit one of the largest short squeezes in history.

Now, some will argue that he has been Using JEFF recently to dilute. But this as well doesn’t make sense since JEFF has kept a strong lid on the pps…if he were diluting or dumping his own shares he would allow the pps to run up over .001(we’ve certainly had the demand to do that) and raise twice as much capital, or make twice as much money.

Now, JEFF starts buying up the basement @ .0001 or maybe even less and starts accumulating 100’s of billions of naked short shares

Just look at the volume for the last 9 months or so…it has to be a couple trillion…not saying there are that many shares out, just that a massive amount have been traded…and being that dilution doesn’t seem the likely cause, than process of elimination leaves us with the short issue.

Now Urban has bought back a decent chunk of the O/S as well as a good piece of the Naked Short shares. Remember this thing was in the cellar for almost a year and there were billions of shares being traded every day – those shares were coming from somewhere; either 1) they were coming from the treasury i.e dilution 2) they are naked short shares. It can only be one or the other; either Urban diluted this into the ground or offshore hedge-funds working together with corrupt broker/dealers have shorted this into the basement trying to bankrupt it. I geuss it’s all a matter of personal opinion. If you honestly believe Urban is a dishonest person and a scam artist and had the nerve to Issue some 450 billion shares to the general public after publicly stating he was in the process of retiring shares than this whole theory is bogus. But if you don’t believe that than the only possible alternative is a large naked short position

4) June/04 - CMKM Diamonds, Inc. Announces It Has Retained D. Roger Glenn, Partner at Edwards & Angell, LLP as Securities Counsel
June/04 - CMKM Diamonds Inc. Announces It is Retaining a Large New York Law Firm to Represent Its Interests.
June/04 - CMKM Diamonds, Inc. Announces Edwards & Angell, LLP. and CMKM Diamonds Inc. Begin Work


This is the strongest evidence to support our theory of a naked short position. CMKX is a small pink sheet company that was rumored to be a scam. It blows my mind that one of the leading securities firm, and a partner of that firm, with profound experience in securities law & corporate governance would take on a client like this. Glenn’s law firm would never allow CMKX as a client unless they had ‘something’. Something that was going to overweigh the risk of taking on a pink sheet, something that would put Angell & Edwards, as well as Roger Glenn, at the forefront of the securities world.

************
** PART II **
************

I believe, that Urban bought back and returned to the treasury a good deal of the O/S through JEFF and then proceeded to buy a ton of the naked short shares. Urban knows the O/S and he knows the number of naked short shares through the transfer agent who is responsible for keeping track of the company’s stock, whether in be in cert form or in a brokerage account. Now if you were planning the largest short squeeze in history, would you want to release the O/S and the NS position to the entities you will be squeezing? Of course not, that’s your ammunition, you have one up because you know both what is real and what is fake(if any)

Now, after Urban was satisfied with what he had accumulated he then went to Roger with the certs returned to the treasury, the actual O/S(from the treasury register), and the TA’s report of the number of shares held aggregate in brokerage accounts…

The T/A was reported as saying 400 billion O/S. This is probably true but may be the OUTSTANDING and not the ISSUED. If indeed there are naked shorts than the outstanding will not be the same as the issued. Because what is aggregate in our brokerage accounts is the outstanding, but it’s not necessary what the company has issued.

Once Roger looked over the evidence he realized what he had here…a chance to make history, for himself and for his firm.

5) With Glenn at his side and probably after a lot of work hunting down the MMs and broker/dealers responsible for assigning valid cusips to bogus shares, Urban in short(excuse the pun) tells them they are royally screwed.
The MMs and broker/dealers realize the situation they are in and report back to their hedge-fund clients what’s about to happen. The hedge-funds either say ‘F you’ to the MMs and broker/dealers, saying it was their responsibility to make the affirmative determinations as to the availability of the security being sold short, or they said - please help us out here.

In any event I believe there were numerous meetings with Roger, Urban and the culpable short sellers who threatened to not cover their shorts and tie the matter up in costly litigation that could easily swing the MMs way if they were to use just a smidgen of the money created from the naked short selling to hire one of the best securities team in the legal world. Urban and Glenn did not want that, it would leave the issue in limbo giving the hedge-funds the ability to cover cheaply or continue manipulating the price.

So they come to an agreement for something of a partial covering situation by the MMs at a low price, of less than .001
They would allow them to buy back say 250 billion(random geuss) shares through the market maker JEFF at a price that would suppress demand for the stock and keep the price low giving them a chance to cover and buy a good deal of retail shares as well at these low prices.

Why would Urban let them get off so easy? 1) The MMs and guilty broker/dealers most likely threatened to tie this up in court 2) He wants to raise capital for the company: .0005 - .0001 = .0004(profit) * …billion = a lot of money for expenses, explorations, buy outs, legal fees etc. 3) He needs the market makers to be on his side in the future 4) We would still have a massive short squeeze because of the drastic decrease in supply as JEFF’s shares are being bought to cover and immediately destroyed.

5) July/20 - CMKM Diamonds, Inc., to invest in Casavant International Mining, Inc. Declares Dividend For Shareholders
July/18 - CMKM Diamonds Inc. Announces Dividend to Shareholders of Record Date and Option Agreement

Now, here it is - the deadline… either the MMs weren’t covering or Urban felt they have had enough time already so he forces them to cover by August 20th.

He allows JEFF to keep selling and keep the price down so as to allow as many new investors to buy in and old longs to add to their position. Anyone buying before August 20th is going to receive a huge dividend, a dividend that sets a value to the company, forces short positions to be covered, and gives a definite timetable to what is going on.

In conclusion; this is all merely speculation and just my opinion. I was looking back on what went on and what is going on now and it just seemed to make sense…All I know is naked short selling is a problem, and has destroyed thousands of companies. All the evidence hitherto shows a large number of shares in the publics hands… a number of shares that seems so large there are only 2 possibilities

1) Urban has issued over 400 billion shares since his last filing of doing just the opposite, making this one of the largest scams/pump & dumps/corporate printing presses in the market’s history. This in turn would create a myriad of legal action against Urban, his coconspirators, and one of largest and most prominent securities law firms in the country. I feel that if the O/S of this company is anywhere near 500 Billion this is indeed one of the largest security scams in American history, and Urban is not only a scammer but a conmen among conmen. IF he has the audacity to print up over 400 billion shares after saying just the opposite, and doing it in such secrecy he is not only a conmen of Enron-like proportions, he will be one of the most hated men in America. He has met with hundreds of shareholders face to face and put his credibility on the line numerous times; if he is in fact lying to us all I surely feel bad for him, his family, and his friends, for as it stands thousands of investors have put their trust and money in his hands and if he blatantly spits in their face there will certainty be hell to pay

2) There is in fact a large naked short position that Urban, Glenn, and JEFF have been dealing with for the last year. If this is the case this stock will make history for 2 reasons 1) it will be the largest short squeeze in history, consequently creating vast amounts of wealth for CMKX investors 2) it will mark the beginning of the end of naked short selling and offshore manipulation of American companies.

Again, this is all speculation but seems to make sense to me…If in fact what I say is only partially true then we are in for one hell of a ride and all I can say is – prepare to be astonished.

IP: Logged

VNGNTN1
Member
posted July 23, 2004 19:46     Click Here to See the Profile for VNGNTN1     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
OK Guys that's a disconnect!
He is not "comfortable" making a pick, but can hammer everyone on everything ?
I would be intrested in a short expose on how Europe and or the new EU is addressing trading.
VAN

[This message has been edited by VNGNTN1 (edited July 23, 2004).]

IP: Logged

Brad
Member
posted July 23, 2004 19:48     Click Here to See the Profile for Brad     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Latest from Zen

-----------------------------------------

TWO POINTS TO MAKE

1. First some perspective. If all we suspect comes true, Urban will have pulled off one of the biggest financial coups in history, transforming from a .0004 stock to a mining force. Now for those that are impatient and want this to happen TOMORROW, I want to bring back some perspective. Roger signed on June 4 according to the PR. We are at July 23. I am IMPRESSED that we already have hard deadlines set for August 20 and August 31 on the dividends. This is moving at LIGHTNING, BREATHTAKING PACE. To those that are impatient and feel like the company is tortoise-like in its moves, I believe that the fact that all of this will likely conclude (or at least be mostly concluded) within a 3 month time frame from Roger's signing on is NOTHING SHORT OF ASTOUNDING. If we are right, we are talking about one of the most extraordinary, history-making, jaw-dropping events in the mining world and in the financial markets themselves. Everybody crying "why don't they just tell us the OS????" needs to step back and understand just HOW COMPLEX this behemoth of a puzzle is and how we simply MUST trust in Roger and Edwards Angell to handle this appropriately. The fact that we are going to have resolution within 3 months is a BARGAIN. It is FACT that we must have the OS by August 20 since they cannot place dividend shares in our account without the proper ratio (which can only be determined based on OS). PLEASE step back and take in some perspective whenever you feel like this is not moving quick enough. Relatively speaking, we are moving at LIGHT SPEED. Those that are not attorneys perhaps do not understand the inordinate amount of time necessary to document, research, back up, justify and support EVERY move that is being made here. Roger signed on June 4. It is now July 23rd. We should know the OS by August 20. Things should all be into place IMO by August 31. This is obviously not a one contract deal. There are obviously SIGNIFICANT pieces in place ALL of which must be addressed with time and great scrutiny. Please just keep the above in mind.

2. I STILL have a vehement disagreement with Urban being at these race events and in contact with shareholders. I am reluctantly resigned to acknoledging that this will simply be the way it is. That having been said, all I can say is to PLEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEASEEEEEEEE remember what I posted before. None of this "Urban said" garbage. If you hear or see others do it, slap them. Qualify anything and everything from the race with IMO or "I believe" or any other appropriate disclaimers. Somebody please post this on RB so that others there can see it.

I have no idea when the next PR is coming but I suspect soon. August 20 is rapidly approaching and I suspect that we will find out more details about how all this will work on an expedited basis at this stage. Good luck to us all and to us making history.


Z

As always, these are my personal opinions.

Hopefully nobody in here is investing anything but "fun" money that they can afford to gamble with.

IP: Logged

HarryHar
Member
posted July 23, 2004 19:53     Click Here to See the Profile for HarryHar     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Did anyone that read the article about "Cannibals" consider the chance that Urban may be working with a "Cannibal" here? If they were working together, Urban would have an "insider" to market making working on his team to squeeze the other market makers. Being that the company owns rights to the minerals under 1.4 million acres, and with the evidence of hundreds of identified anomolies, Urban could in theory have teamed up with one market maker to become the "cannibal" in possibly the first multi-million or billion dollar case of Cannabalism in history, with Roger over seeing the whole thing... Does anyone remember where that article came from? Just a thought...

IP: Logged

Upside
Member
posted July 23, 2004 20:01     Click Here to See the Profile for Upside     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Brad,
One question regarding your theory. CMKX, had a name change (from CMKM to CMKX) and new CUSIP number assigned to it in March of this year. I'm not an expert in these matters but that is supposed to expose any short position there is as new certificates with the new # have to be issued. Why didn't it expose the massive short position then or is this just a recent development?

IP: Logged

timberman
Member
posted July 23, 2004 20:01     Click Here to See the Profile for timberman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Could someone please explain to me why its so hard to know the amount of shares issued. I mean shouldnt there be records somewhere that says this number of shares issued on this date and on that?

IP: Logged

mizzou7
Member
posted July 23, 2004 20:06     Click Here to See the Profile for mizzou7     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Anyone see this today...

Jul 23, 2004 (financialwire.net via COMTEX) -- (FinancialWire) Buyers and sellers of CMKM Diamonds, Inc. (OTC: CMKX) stock may be beginning to wonder who will be delivering their shares, according to Stock Patrol (http://www.stockpatrol.com), which partners with Investrend Information's (http://www.investrendinformation.com) Investor Resource Center.

StockPatrol had already identified the company as the all-time champion in terms of authorized shares, and said it may be on the road to becoming the first trillion share company.

StockPatrol.com stated:

At 9:56 pm on June 29, 2004, CMKM announced that it had engaged a new transfer agent, Pacific Stock Transfer Company of Las Vegas, Nevada.

At the time, the Company said that it was "looking forward to working with [Pacific Stock Transfer and] confident that Pacific Stock Transfer will process transactions in the Company's stock accurately and quickly.

On July 2, 2004, StockPatrol.com contacted Pacific Stock Transfer seeking to learn just how many of CMKM's 500 billion authorized shares had been issued. We were told to call back on July 6th, when the appropriate party would be available. When we called again on July 6th we were advised instead that Pacific Stock Transfer had ceased to act as CMKM's transfer agent as of 2:15pm on July 1st.

CMKM's relationship with Pacific Stock Transfer had lasted less than two days.

On July 8, 2004, CMKM issued a press release announcing simply that 1st Global Stock Transfer had been re-engaged as the Company's transfer agent. We contacted 1st Global to inquire about the number of outstanding shares, but were advised that only the Company can provide that information.

Will the relationship with 1st Global last this time around? The Company's principals may be hedging their bets?

On July 1, 2004, the same day the Pacific Stock Transfer association was dissolved, the "Desert Stock Transfer Company" was formed in the State of Nevada. The President, Secretary and Treasurer of Desert Stock Transfer? Urban Casavant, the President of CMKM, StockPatrol.com concluded.

For up-to-the-minute news, features and links click on http://www.financialwire.net

FinancialWire is an independent, proprietary news service of Investrend Information, a division of Investrend Communications, Inc. It is not a press release service and receives no compensation for its news or opinions. Other divisions of Investrend, however, provide shareholder empowerment platforms such as forums, independent research and webcasting. For more information or to receive the FirstAlert daily summary of news, commentary, research reports, webcasts, events and conference calls, click on http://www.investrend.com/contact.asp

IP: Logged

TradingWizard
Member
posted July 23, 2004 20:44     Click Here to See the Profile for TradingWizard     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Yes we did, I think on page 18 or 19

------------------
'Alone we can do so little; together we can do so much.' - Helen Keller

IP: Logged

Brad
Member
posted July 23, 2004 21:24     Click Here to See the Profile for Brad     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Upside:
Brad,
One question regarding your theory. CMKX, had a name change (from CMKM to CMKX) and new CUSIP number assigned to it in March of this year. I'm not an expert in these matters but that is supposed to expose any short position there is as new certificates with the new # have to be issued. Why didn't it expose the massive short position then or is this just a recent development?

Which theory is that Upside? I'm short on theories. You may be talking about a repost of something I picked up from another board.

IP: Logged

Upside
Member
posted July 23, 2004 21:28     Click Here to See the Profile for Upside     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Sorry Brad, you're right. I thought your post from earlier (the one that starts out with you being on a plane all day) was actually your theory. My apologies again!

IP: Logged

Brad
Member
posted July 23, 2004 21:29     Click Here to See the Profile for Brad     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
No sweat Upside.

IP: Logged

thinkmoney
Member
posted July 23, 2004 21:34     Click Here to See the Profile for thinkmoney     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
oh dear, richness is back,
this is a free country so the moderators should have kept him removed.
Ever since he has been back just idiotic posts.
I wish the member here would not respond and argue with richness because then you are just like him. Ignore works wonders.
Did I have to read all the garbage about richness

I will not address richness again, but this tiem, if you dont like CMKX move on.
Others, you support it when you give it attention.

apparently, some kids can only get negative attention sice they didint get th positive when growing up.

all they kknow is negative. so iwonder if i have to read thru so much trash jsut because richness is back on.

why the heck is he back on?

IP: Logged

Wallace#1
Member
posted July 23, 2004 21:40     Click Here to See the Profile for Wallace#1     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
VAN,

How's this for a pick? CMKX Here's another. CIM LMAO

Seriously, under the circumstances, I doubt if I would give a pick either.

IP: Logged

tradingpennys
Member
posted July 23, 2004 21:47     Click Here to See the Profile for tradingpennys     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Glad to see you back richness!
You mention about someone wanting to see the property in Canada.
This afternoon I was thinking the same thing. If I could afford it (and out of curiousity), I would hire that Co. that did the fly over for CMKM. That way you would see EXACTLY what we were promised by Melvin we could see pictures of. (of course we haven't seen squat). It would save alot of driving around the country side!! lol

IP: Logged

Wallace#1
Member
posted July 23, 2004 21:53     Click Here to See the Profile for Wallace#1     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Yes, WELCOME BACK richness!!! Don't let them get to you.

By the way, has anyone heard anything about D Roger Glenn? Where the h*ll is he? He wasn't even mentioned in the release re UCAD.

IP: Logged

bill1352
Member
posted July 23, 2004 22:03     Click Here to See the Profile for bill1352     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
i think we all might be making a mistake thinking that the o/s will be announced aug 20th or even aug 30th...all the pr said was that stockholders of that date would get shares..there is no need to say anything about the o/s till whatever date they decide to place them in our accounts. they know the o/s right now so to split the shares up is not a problem. the post from zen says it has to be announced then..i don't see why. heck all they have to do is put then in our accounts, ya know they might be reading these soap opera boards and have bets going on the figureing and geniusus say they know the o/s because 15 shares times this divided by that times pie equals this....come to think of it that might be a fun way to do it..sure would give us something to talk about other then whos a moron & who isn't

IP: Logged

JBCak47
Member
posted July 23, 2004 22:30     Click Here to See the Profile for JBCak47     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Money P-Daddy wrote: "Allright, John, I admit I still have less than you (2.5 million) . But my kids own about another 1.5 million, does that count, LOL. I feel good though about buying at 0.0004 today. It was a sale indeed!
"

yes that qualifies My parents also own 800k shares, of that my dad has 600k, my Mom 200k... lol...

It's going to be a quiet night, not like last week,lol...

-John-

IP: Logged

Wallace#1
Member
posted July 23, 2004 22:33     Click Here to See the Profile for Wallace#1     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
What I cannot figure out is how they will determine who will get the dividend if there was a lot of naked short selling.

Here's the way I am looking at it:

Let's say, for example, there are 500 shares authorized. Out of that 500 shs, say 400 shs are issued and outstanding.

Now suppose UC owns 250 of the 400 issued and outstanding. That would leave 150 shs as a public float. Now, if there were an additional 50 shs naked shorted (not covered), wouldn't the DTC show a total of 200 shs in the public float?

If that is the case (200 shs pub. float, 50 of which are naked), the DTC will not know which are valid and which are naked.

Then, when the Transfer Agent contacts the DTC for a breakdown of all the holders of shares (bear in mind these would be "street name holders since the TA would already have the names of holders with physical certificates), the DTC would pass them a broken down total of 200 shs in the names of x-broker, y-broker and z-broker.

Would the naked shares be specifically identified...I don't think so, but maybe I am wrong. Any comments?

IP: Logged

tradingpennys
Member
posted July 23, 2004 22:33     Click Here to See the Profile for tradingpennys     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I dont think Glenn is around. Several past Pr's have not mentioned him. Remember how he "took hold" after he was hired. That only lasted ... what 2 PR's. Kinda like how thier TA's last! LOL

IP: Logged

bill1352
Member
posted July 23, 2004 22:49     Click Here to See the Profile for bill1352     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
wallace...i dont think the dtc, the mm's or anyone other then UC & the lawyers know how many shares UC & insiders own. remember his wife, brother (whoever that other casivite is) all have had and probably added to shares. if UC is so sure there is naked shorting and really if it turns out true i believe its because of insiders buying while on pink sheets and not declaring what they own. also just a thought there were prs about retiring shares maybe he increased the a/s just to set up the naked shorting mm's i've always had the idea UC had a conman streak in him, jacking the a/s to the roof and then not authorizing them sure would set the mm's up. either way the ucad shares go to all o/s even insiders

IP: Logged

Upside
Member
posted July 23, 2004 22:51     Click Here to See the Profile for Upside     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Interesting question Wallace. If you assume the naked short theory is correct, how would they know which ones were naked and which were real. Do brokerage houses have x amount of shares in inventory and anything over and above that amount would be naked shorts? Even if that was the case though, if they're all in street name, who would get the dividend and who wouldn't?

IP: Logged

Grasshopper
Member
posted July 23, 2004 22:52     Click Here to See the Profile for Grasshopper     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Wow, c'mon TP! I would have thought that by this point the last thing being called into question would be the 1.4 million acres in mineral rights that WE currently own. Deosn't the fact that UCAD traded us 35.25 million dollars (as of todays PPS) for 5% of our mineral rights mean anything to you!?!

Bill, I am totally new to most of this and I'm trying to comprehend what the heck is going on.....When the company (CMKX) declares a dividend that is payable to all shareholders registered as of a certain date (in this case Aug 20th) wouldn't the shareholders legally be entitled to know exactly how many shares they are being rewarded with, even if the actual payout date is still unknown??? I have a difficult time imagining a company being allowed to announce such a thing without having some kind of accountability....

IP: Logged

bill1352
Member
posted July 23, 2004 22:58     Click Here to See the Profile for bill1352     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
if this whole thing plays out to there really is a huge naked short and mm's are running the pps to cover and UC has been playing them like a fiddle i'd first be shocked, second tip my hat to him and third put my boot where the sun don't shine because he could have used all that energy into finding the diamonds

IP: Logged

Wallace#1
Member
posted July 23, 2004 23:04     Click Here to See the Profile for Wallace#1     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Up,

Re your post immediately above, that is exactly my point. How would they know who was really entitled to the dividend?

Re your earlier post about the name chg and the CUSIP number, I don't think that would do a thing. Shs in street name would not need or require new certifs. Physical certifs in the old name would still be valid...only if they were turned back in for the changes would the new ones be reissued.

Correction: Shs in street name would be not require changes either.

[This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited July 23, 2004).]

[This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited July 23, 2004).]

IP: Logged

bill1352
Member
posted July 23, 2004 23:09     Click Here to See the Profile for bill1352     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
according to the deal those shares are restricted for 1 yr and it never said when it was payable. if my boss says he is giving me a 10% bonus finders fee for a job and that i'll get paid when he does how do i know what that 10% is until i see the check unless he decides to tell me the total job cost. do i have a right to know even thought its a bonus and not a part of any binding agreement?...remember cmkx is not reporting and this is legal. these shares are a bonus and not a part of what we bought when buying into cmkx. unless they plan on becoming a reporting company i don't think they will just announce the o/s withouty all the rest of the info like the insiders shares and financial info

IP: Logged

highwaychild
Member
posted July 23, 2004 23:12     Click Here to See the Profile for highwaychild     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Wallace#1:

What I cannot figure out
Here's the way I am looking at it:
Let's say.
Now suppose
I don't think so, but maybe I am wrong.
Any comments?

HA HA HA
Yep,
So what your tring to say is CMKX, bad.
I got you the first time.
I can see why daytraders hate 'em,It's a daytraders nightmare.It will take time for CMKX to pay off.One thing they don't have...is time.
But me, I got all the time in the world and at the same time make it a better place(the world).I'm a construction surveyor.
The money is alot more steady then the penny market.HA HA HA,but not near as fun.
Good luck everybody.


IP: Logged

bill1352
Member
posted July 23, 2004 23:14     Click Here to See the Profile for bill1352     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
they might not know who owns naked and who owns real shares...i don't think it would end up mattering because legally our brokers send out confirmations of our buying shares. this means they guarenty we own shares. whoever sold nakes shares would have shareholders, brokers, the sec and media all over them...can you imagine the lawyers coming out of the woodwork looking to sue?

IP: Logged

Wallace#1
Member
posted July 23, 2004 23:17     Click Here to See the Profile for Wallace#1     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
highwaychild,

My post had nothing to do with CMKX being bad or good.

IP: Logged

Acherontia styx
Member
posted July 23, 2004 23:17     Click Here to See the Profile for Acherontia styx     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I've been following this thread with much interest for awhile now and wanted to finally contribute. I have an equation that may allow shareholders to roughly determine the O/S count once the share dividends are distributed. Please correct me if I'm wrong in my thinking. Equation:

X(Y)/Z = O/S count

X = Number of total shares held by you. (Exp. 1,000,000)
Y = Number of total shares involved in the dividend. (Exp. 7,500,000 UCAD)
Z = Number of total shares you received through dividend. (Exp. 25)

Because I don't know how stock dividends are paid if there is naked shorting, I can't offer another equation, so in my view, this is only good if there is no N.S. What do you think?

IP: Logged

bill1352
Member
posted July 23, 2004 23:23     Click Here to See the Profile for bill1352     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
i dont really buy this naked short theory i think the o/s is huge but these last to moves make you wonder because they are set up with 2 things...first ucad has almost no shares in the market as a whole, this deal almost doubles their shares,...second cim can not be bought to cover any naked shares if as of aug 31st there are naked shares in the market...why do this and with those types of shares if somebody wasn't real sure there were huge amounts of naked shares

IP: Logged

Upside
Member
posted July 23, 2004 23:24     Click Here to See the Profile for Upside     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Wallace,
To my understanding, and please correct me if I'm wrong, when I buy shares through my broker (ameritrade) and they are held in street name, ameritrade has to register x amount of shares in my name in their books to prove that I'm the owner, then within a specific time period their share count is reported to the transfer agent. I'm assuming this is the case for each and every broker out there. If so, wouldn't there actually be a record of every legitimate shareholder out there? Granted it might be a nightmare to gather this information but theoretically at least it should be possible.

IP: Logged

bill1352
Member
posted July 23, 2004 23:26     Click Here to See the Profile for bill1352     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
thats true styx...i'm sort of hoping that one day i see ucad in my account without a pr about the o/s...can ya see this board that day?...be a very interesting posting day

IP: Logged

Upside
Member
posted July 23, 2004 23:30     Click Here to See the Profile for Upside     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Acherontia,
That's the formula we're all going to use if /when those shares show up in our accounts. By the way, your real name wouldn't happen to be Diego would it?

IP: Logged

Wallace#1
Member
posted July 23, 2004 23:30     Click Here to See the Profile for Wallace#1     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Remember in my example, we were presupposing 50 naked shares. If the TA says there are only 150 shs out there (in public float), just who is going to come up with the 50 naked shs you and I bought? The TA? No! The Co? No! Your broker? How? They do not exist.

IP: Logged

bill1352
Member
posted July 23, 2004 23:31     Click Here to See the Profile for bill1352     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
my lawyer...i hope...lol

IP: Logged

Upside
Member
posted July 23, 2004 23:40     Click Here to See the Profile for Upside     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Wallace,
Ok, in your example there are 50 shares out there that don't exist right? But, of the 150 legitimate shares that do exist, is there no way to tie those 150 shares to the legitimate holders? You know what, never mind, I just figured it out. All 200 shares even the 50 naked will have someones name tied to them.

IP: Logged

highwaychild
Member
posted July 23, 2004 23:40     Click Here to See the Profile for highwaychild     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Okay,UCAD is @$4.70 and CMKX is @$0.0004.
If they were to do a merge would the pps be $2.3502?Would that would be the average?

[This message has been edited by highwaychild (edited July 23, 2004).]

IP: Logged

Wallace#1
Member
posted July 23, 2004 23:41     Click Here to See the Profile for Wallace#1     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Up,

Now, we're getting into an area of which I am not 100% sure. My understanding, is that, unless someone in that public float demands (asks) for their physical certificate, it is merely an electronic entry on the DTC's records under the name of the broker (meaning street name). Even with a split, I believe what happens is that shs are credited to a broker's particular account with the DTC and then the broker credits the shareholder's account. It's possible, but I doubt if physical certifs are moved around. I am just not sure how these functions are accomplished and am basically guessing here.

Talk to you later...

IP: Logged

JBCak47
Member
posted July 24, 2004 00:18     Click Here to See the Profile for JBCak47     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I dated a Spanish girl... I understood like 35% of it I got the jist of it...heheheheh....


No negoiations...lol...


-John-

IP: Logged

tradingpennys
Member
posted July 24, 2004 00:22     Click Here to See the Profile for tradingpennys     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Grasshopper
Member posted July 23, 2004 22:52
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Wow, c'mon TP! I would have thought that by this point the last thing being called into question would be the 1.4 million acres in mineral rights that WE currently own. Deosn't the fact that UCAD traded us 35.25 million dollars (as of todays PPS) for 5% of our mineral rights mean anything to you!?!
_____________________________________
That 35.25 Million is only the value on paper, nothing more. UCAD has in thier bank account I think a total of $408.00 dollars.

IP: Logged

Upside
Member
posted July 24, 2004 00:30     Click Here to See the Profile for Upside     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
originally posted by dodga:
quote:
eu desejo a todos muitos sorte e sucesso. Eu amo meus povos do companheiro com todo meu coração e desculpo-me sincerely se qualquer offended por minha conversação mais adiantada com moedas de um centavo negociando e Wallace#1. O Deus Bless América

Huh?

IP: Logged

Acherontia styx
Member
posted July 24, 2004 00:47     Click Here to See the Profile for Acherontia styx     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
That's good to know my formula could potentially work. I never saw anyone remark about it before, and wanted to check. You never know, maybe it could have been different in this case.

Upside: Sorry, but my real name isn't Diego. It must just be coincidence if you're connecting my username with someone. I'm a fan of The Silence of the Lambs and got the name from that.

IP: Logged

Upside
Member
posted July 24, 2004 00:51     Click Here to See the Profile for Upside     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
It did come from your user name but it's from an obscure Italain CD I used to have.

IP: Logged


This topic is 45 pages long:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45 

All times are ET (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Open Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  
Hop to:

Contact Us | Allstocks.com Home Page

© 1997 - 2004 Allstocks.com. All rights reserved.

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a