 Topic Closed
|
 Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board
 Micro Penny Stocks, Penny Stocks Under $0.10
 CMKX IV New Thread....GOT IT - HOLDIN' IT (Page 11)
|
 UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! This topic is 45 pages long: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 |
next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: CMKX IV New Thread....GOT IT - HOLDIN' IT |
|
StonedPigeon Member |
posted July 20, 2004 19:26
  
quote: -------------------------------------------- Just remember folks there are no dirty girls IP: Logged |
|
Upside Member |
posted July 20, 2004 19:28
originally posted by JBCak47: quote: You got some kind of addiction? If we're voting here, mine goes in for the Asian/American mix. IP: Logged |
|
Money_Penny Member |
posted July 20, 2004 19:29
quote: I got the best of both worlds - I am married to a german/russian girl (german heritage, russian accent). yamommayamommayamomma IP: Logged |
|
StonedPigeon Member |
posted July 20, 2004 19:31
I'm not sure what scares me more, that dirty girl smell or the dirty girl who thinks I'm fooled by the fresh mountain rain! IP: Logged |
|
tradingpennys Member |
posted July 20, 2004 19:34
I figured you all were guys... LOL I am scotch, french, danish, spanish, and half german. IP: Logged |
|
JBCak47 Member |
posted July 20, 2004 19:34
Asian/American mix. Yeah that is a REALLY hot mix, white skin with asian eyes and face... ========================================== My vote? Hmmmmmm... White, Jewish Girl, with a little spanish in her... OR Australian Girls With those accents, not really British, lol.... -John- IP: Logged |
|
JBCak47 Member |
posted July 20, 2004 19:36
"Just remember folks there are no dirty girls after last call! " Spoken like a true stoned bird lol... How are ya SP? I am doing well, I have increased my shares of cmkx today!!! I have 2.74 million -John- P.S. WARNING DO NOT FEED PIGEONS. 500 Dollar Fine/And or imprisonment. IP: Logged |
|
Money_Penny Member |
posted July 20, 2004 19:40
You can feed 'em, just don't give 'em weed. IP: Logged |
|
JBCak47 Member |
posted July 20, 2004 19:43
OFF-TOPIC: Money_Penny
SP: Mountain fresh! hahahahahahah, Yummmmmmmmmmm Smells like a Summer's Eve... (not unlike the smell of two day old pork sitting in a dumpster, in the 100 degree heat, at a Chinese Take-out...) ============================================ Come on guys, How many of us here see a 'dirty' girl and smile and think about it... That thought changes when you think of your girl friend and how you would neevr touch her is she was just 10% as dirty as the 'dirty' girl,lol... Ironic to say the least... As in the words of a great poet, Snoop Dogg once said: But? We don't love them ho's!
IP: Logged |
|
tradingpennys Member |
posted July 20, 2004 19:50
CIM was the ticker for the company we are supposed to get dividends from? IP: Logged |
|
Money_Penny Member |
posted July 20, 2004 19:51
Wholly crap, I think we have this thread to ourselves tonight, everybody got offended and left, LOL. I know one thing, all this will be erased by tomorrow morning...so our souls shall be wiped clean....until the next time. IP: Logged |
|
Upside Member |
posted July 20, 2004 19:55
originally posted by tradingpennys: quote: There is no ticker symbol. It's a company that is not publicly traded and might not even exist, just like last time. IP: Logged |
|
tradingpennys Member |
posted July 20, 2004 19:56
Okay thanks Upside. IP: Logged |
|
kevy0899 Member |
posted July 20, 2004 19:56
I know its a complete guess, however I am just curious to see what people think the price will reach by August 20th? Any opinions? Thanks. IP: Logged |
|
VNGNTN1 Member |
posted July 20, 2004 19:57
OK GUYS We are americans and our Canadians friends need a hand can we give it to them. OFF TOPIC POST"LET's HELP MELVIN" VAN IP: Logged |
|
Money_Penny Member |
posted July 20, 2004 19:58
Kevy, My wild ass off the wall guess is .001 IP: Logged |
|
Brad Member |
posted July 20, 2004 20:01
This from sterling. **************************** From Sterling:
(Original Post The Market Makers (MMs) will not let CMKX achieve some major runs of sustainment until they Double Short to Double Cover in my opinion. The MMs may not win, but they won’t lose either. They must create a second set of naked short inventory above and beyond the first set originally created to trade parallel each other at a minimum. The MMs must match the sells of the original naked short to make this happen with the second set. This is why we are seeing so much volume going through at the ask as if the MMs are on a mission. That’s because they are and time is not on their side too. The volume is even more for the double shorting to match the recent buying of further naked shorted shares. Here’s how the MMs will cover in my opinion to explain the huge volume with no movement. Let’s say that the naked short position is at 500,000,000,000 shares, which later will be 1 trillion. Let’s say that they originally naked shorted CMKX at an average price as indicated below: 100,000,000,000 x .05 = $5,000,000,000 These 500,000,000,000 shares are shares that equate to $15,000,000,000 of pure profit because these are naked shorted shares that did not exist that were made to exist when the MMs sold them to you and CUSIP numbers were assigned to each naked shorted share created. This is like the MMs creating $15,000,000,000 out of thin air at the expense o the company because when sold, they are absorbed into the float to create enhanced dilution unless bought back from the MMs to cover. The MMs would need to put back the amount of profits to wash out the transaction for the naked short position. This means that they will have to get those naked shorted shares out of circulation. This means that they are going to have to capture those fake or counterfeit shares that were transformed into real shares with the assigning of a CUSIP number by increasing the bid to a price high enough to entice us to sell so they could capture our naked short shares to make them cease to exist to equate to make appear a situation as if nothing ever happening. The amount that they need to put back to cover the naked shorted position is valued at $15,000,000,000. So now the thought would be for the MMs to see how they would be able to get $15,000,000,000 since they already have spent this long ago because they thought that CMKX was like most of your penny stocks and would not succeed in their long term business plans. This first naked shorted position of 500,000,000,000 shares equates to $15,000,000,000 that we will call the Fist Set of Inventory for a better understanding. The MMs would need to “double short” to “double cover” to make this happen. This means that they will short CMKX for a second time to position themselves to do a double cover at much higher prices to where they not only break-even, but possibly make a profit. This is done by the MMs creating a Second Set of Inventory to use as MM leverage. To do this they will need to make $15,000,000,000 to break-even and account for 500,000,000,000 shares of CMKX. They could have started this process at .0007 cent(s). This means that they paid $250,000,000 per the amount below to come up with the 500,000,000,000 shares: 100,000,000,000 x .0007 = $70,000,000 Again, this means that the MMs paid $250,000,000 to get a Second Set of Inventory of naked short shares to equate to their First Set of Inventory of naked short shares. Each set is 500,000,000,000 shares mirroring each other in trade. The 2 sets totaled equates to 1 trillion shares naked shorted. This is how they will “double short” to “double cover” to fix this situation. The initial $15,000,000,000 gained from the First Set of Inventory of naked shorted shares was pure profit and the MMs are only tapping into their profits of money they never had anyway before they naked shorted to cover. So the $15,000,000,000 - $250,000,000 = $14,750,000,000 of profit after creating their Second Set of Inventory. The MMs must get 500,000,000,000 to use as leverage to maintain their profits or at least break even. To get these shares, they create a Second Set of Inventory for 500,000,000,000 shares back to themselves. This is the same concept as to when the sold us shareholders 500,000,000,000 shares that did not exist. They are just selling them to themselves now with assigned CUSIP numbers making them real shares with real value that is in their hands now when they sell. This is a naked short position that they have now created for themselves that they can control when to cover. Since there are 2 sets of inventory of naked short shares, this means that there are 2 sets of covering that must at least mirror themselves during the covering process. The first set of inventory for covering will be the MMs trying to get us as shareholders to sell back our 500,000,000,000 naked short shares to get them out of circulation for existing by increasing the bid to entice us to sell at the prices that are attractive to our desires for profits. When we sell, they cover naked short shares from the first set of inventory. The second set of inventory for covering will be the MMs simply selling back to themselves 500,000,000,000 naked short shares to get those out of circulation for existing by holding and selling any shares before or lower than any of the shares sold from the first set of inventory. When they sell, they cover naked short shares from the second set of inventory. Let’s further explain how this would work… To do this, the MMs will establish what I will call Levels of Covering. To keep things simple, let’s arbitrarily pick 5 Levels of Covering; .10 cents, .20 cents, .30 cents, .40 cents, and .50 cents. Remember, the primary goal is to get the 500,000,000,000 shares out of circulation out of our hands so they could make them go away. They will place their second set of inventory of 500,000,000,000 at a limit to sell at .10 cents. They will now raise the price of CMKX up to .10 cents. Every share that we sell all the way up to .10 cents gets deducted from the second set of inventory because the MMs will sell the equivalent amount of shares sold to capture the lost of money used that they had to pay for our shares when we sold. Example: Let’s say that when they first attempted to entice us to sell to get shares to cover for the first set on inventory, they only got 100,000,000,000 naked short out of circulation. This means that the most that the MMs could have paid for those shares were: 100,000,000,000 x .10 cents = $10,000,000,000 This means that they will now sell 100,000,000,000 from the second set of inventory at .10 cents back to themselves to give them back the $10,000,000,000 they spent to pay for the amount it cost for buying our 100,000,000,000 share from the first set of inventory. This was an even wash of 100,000,000,000 naked short shares removed from both sets of inventory totaling 200,000,000,000 naked shorted shares. This reduces the 1 trillion shares naked shorted down to 800,000,000,000 shares needing to be covered. This leaves 400,000,000,000 for each set of inventory remaining to be covered. This process will repeat at each level of the 5 levels of covering to next include the .20 cents, .30 cents, .40 cents, and .50 cents per 100,000,000,000 shares at each level. The numbers could fluctuate for what could actually transpire. The point to see is that the MMs will double cover and sell whenever we sell to make sure they at least breakeven to wash out the money that would be spent for running up the price to entice selling by increasing the bid. Some shareholders will hold and the resolution for that will take another post to explain this process. (I could explain it faster in Paltalk or on the phone.) Again, please keep in mind, the MMs didn’t spend money to get any of the first set of inventory of naked short shares. They created these shares out of nowhere to make them exist electronically by assigning them CUSIP numbers to make them manifest in the brokerage accounts. All of this was pure profit from using our money to sell us the fictitiously created shares. This is when during the creation of the first set of inventory; the naked short shares went to the shareholders while the profits went to the MMs. To further keep in mind, the MMs didn’t spend money to get any of the second set of inventory of naked short shares. They created these shares too out of nowhere to make them exist electronically by assigning them CUSIP numbers to make them manifest in their brokerage accounts this time. All of this was pure profit too from using no money at all to simply fictitiously create shares. This is when during the creation of the second set of inventory; the naked short shares went to the MMs this time along with the profits going to the MMs too. So when you are wondering why we are getting all of this volume and no movement, understand that this is something that could be happening to keep the MMs from either going out of business, facing multiple class action law suits, or just simply being out of lots of money. This is how the MMs might not always win, but they won’t lose either. They will seldom ever lose. They are here to create and maintain an orderly market and sometimes naked shorting shares was a technique used to help to establish more liquidity to a stock until enough volume was generated for that stock to trade in an orderly fashion. It has grown to another venue to harness the greed for money and power that has grown to a level to where the rich gets richer and the poor gets poorer. There is much more to this story that really should not be discussed on these message boards. For those who are wondering where was all the volume to show 1 trillion shares traded, read the post below: http://www.ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CLB01219&read=40793 These were only my opinions that I created as food for thought since many were hungry for an understanding. I hope their minds are full from this meal. This is another thought/opinion as to what could explain the reasons for all of the volume while slowly downward trending. I think that we will soon see the reasons why Urban and Roger Glenn had come into the lives of each other for the benefit of all shareholders! All is well! http://www.sterlingsclass.com/ IP: Logged |
|
Upside Member |
posted July 20, 2004 20:06
So now we're not just naked shorted, we're DOUBLE naked shorted! This keeps getting better and better! What's next, double dog dare ya triple naked shorted? IP: Logged |
|
Booty Quest Member |
posted July 20, 2004 20:08
I'll be nice  [This message has been edited by Booty Quest (edited July 20, 2004).] IP: Logged |
|
TradingWizard Member |
posted July 20, 2004 20:15
Well dirty boys haveing fun with dirty girls today - the bo.... dancing queen is really cracking me up. ...they are gone now... [This message has been edited by TradingWizard (edited July 21, 2004).] IP: Logged |
|
Money_Penny Member |
posted July 20, 2004 20:23
This Sterling guy is giving me a headache (maybe it's the long island iced tea, too!)...single shorted...double shorted, what the hell! Can all this crap become any more complicated? I want facts now and I am sick of speculation. I am long and strong and I will find out if I am worth a damn sooner or later. In the meantime, let's talk dirty women! IP: Logged |
|
shadow Member |
posted July 20, 2004 20:25
Really getting tired of the BS surrounding this company. I had sent message(s) to Mr Glenn requesting Today I contacted the Nevada Secretary of State Securities Division to learn the Talked with a person who directed me to someone else (who happened to be on the phone so I got to leave a message...) followed up with an e-mail with a list In Southern Nevada: State of Nevada Phone: 702 486 2440 The only thing that I have seen is these IP: Logged |
|
darrenbaker Member |
posted July 20, 2004 20:33
I will be glad to set something up for her. I'll post info when I get it done. I'll call it Melvin's wife's medical fund. Any objections? Darren IP: Logged |
|
tradingpennys Member |
posted July 20, 2004 20:36
""The MMs would need to “double short” to “double cover” to make this happen. This means that they will short CMKX for a second time to position themselves to do a double cover at much higher prices to where they not only break-even, but possibly make a profit. This is done by the MMs creating a Second Set of Inventory to use as MM leverage."" LMAO !! I wonder what color sterlings eye are. IP: Logged |
|
tradingpennys Member |
posted July 20, 2004 20:38
quote: I wrote requesting the same info. from the company. And of course no one responded. IP: Logged |
|
tradingpennys Member |
posted July 20, 2004 20:42
oh hey Money_penny... ya wanna take a look at one of my web sites? It's about Female Dominance and submission. <hehehe> IP: Logged |
|
Brad Member |
posted July 20, 2004 20:46
quote:
IP: Logged |
|
Money_Penny Member |
posted July 20, 2004 20:50
quote: Darren, as far as I am concerned, go ahead and set up the account (it's free anyways). Paypal is the most common service out there...they keep about 3-4% of the incoming money but I think it is the easiest vehicle for setting up such a collection. If you need help, let me know. Let us know the account "number" (usually an e-mail address in case of PayPal) and I will help spread the word as much as I can. IP: Logged |
|
Money_Penny Member |
posted July 20, 2004 20:52
quote: Sounds funky. Where's the link??? IP: Logged |
|
bill1352 Member |
posted July 20, 2004 20:55
ok this is my opinion only but i think the double shorting this sterling was talking about was tequilla in a short glass...i'm just guessing here but i'm sure he was given only 1 1/2 shots of tequilla when he paid for a full double...Paul..after you get the fund for Melvin's wife (good thing there) maybe we can set up a fund to get sterling into rehab...maybe we can all chip in 2 shares of cmkx, i mean with his figuring that would at least run into the hundreds of thousands...just my opinion...food for thought here IP: Logged |
|
Wallace#1 Member |
posted July 20, 2004 21:02
What in hell is the matter with you people? Richness was saying something and you refuse to listen! What he was saying is that on this thread you do not need more people to hype CMKX (and he noted that most were on the young side with little experience - generally in their 20's). He stated that many were "dreamers" which is very close to the truth. Looking at the lack of experience of many posters, he is also saying that more people are needed with at least some trading experience. IMO Cut the crap about about Euro-trash. Everyone in these United States (except for full blooded Indians) is of European descent. As to the use of the English language, certain people on this thread have absolutely no excuse to talk. Most of us do not even remember how WE sounded when learning English for the first time. Brad, I know you are new to this. Do not let yourself get caught up in the basher sh*t. Your posts indicate you are much more intelligent than that. [This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited July 20, 2004).] IP: Logged |
|
darrenbaker Member |
posted July 20, 2004 21:07
Money_penny It's set up. I will set up Melvins bank account for later deposit after we have something to give them. The email account number is: darrenbaker@opmercy.com I would like Paul to contact me so we can use him as "accountabilty" for these funds. I will not promote this any further as it may look self serving or "fishy". I'll leave that up to all of you. I pray GOD'S hand and blessings on this project. Certianly HIS healing on Vicky. Darren Baker IP: Logged |
|
Money_Penny Member |
posted July 20, 2004 21:14
Darren, AMEN to that. Paul, let's get the word out. IP: Logged |
|
Money_Penny Member |
posted July 20, 2004 21:16
Wallace, can't you see we're trying to do some good here? [This message has been edited by Money_Penny (edited July 20, 2004).] [This message has been edited by Money_Penny (edited July 20, 2004).] IP: Logged |
|
Brad Member |
posted July 20, 2004 21:17
Fair enough Wallace. But it doesn't take away from the fact that richness was attempting to be constructive with his criticism of the stock. The impression is that he walks into the room acting like he knows something he doesn't. It's safe to say that tons of information on these boards is speculative. Including from richness. But there is a way to offer criticism that appears to be constructive or thought provoking (even if it's speculative) rather than condescending. Richness doesn't offer that and rubs people the wrong way, period. IP: Logged |
|
highwaychild Member |
posted July 20, 2004 21:19
I know of someone very experienced on this sort of thing...oh, what's his name...D. Roger Glenn ,Esq. ,oh yea, that's it. IP: Logged |
|
Brad Member |
posted July 20, 2004 21:19
quote: Fair enough Wallace. But it doesn't take away from the fact that richness wasn't attempting to be constructive with his criticism of the stock. The impression is that he walks into the room acting like he knows something he doesn't. It's safe to say that tons of information on these boards is speculative. Including from richness. But there is a way to offer criticism that appears to be constructive or thought provoking (even if it's speculative) rather than condescending. Richness doesn't offer that and rubs people the wrong way, period. [This message has been edited by Brad (edited July 20, 2004).] IP: Logged |
|
Money_Penny Member |
posted July 20, 2004 21:20
I don't like him rubbing me in any way, shape or form, period! IP: Logged |
|
Booty Quest Member |
posted July 20, 2004 21:24
Let's not forget that Rich is a total fraud! We've already exposed his fake bad english which has purposely gotten worse since we pointed out some excellent english posts of his/hers. Don't be fooled by the fool. Or your foolishness... I mean your fool... well, the fool who has... uhhh... a fool and his money...? yeah... IP: Logged |
|
Wallace#1 Member |
posted July 20, 2004 21:25
Brad, Richness just may know more than any of us about stocks and trading. His grasp of our language just is not as good as someone who grew up with it. MP - You seem to jump on every bandwagon that comes along. As far as a room is concerned...I am not interested. However, you and your buddy seem quite cozy. He says something stupid and you second it. IP: Logged |
|
Money_Penny Member |
posted July 20, 2004 21:26
Booty, you've been hanging out with StonedPigeon too much, LOL. IP: Logged |
|
Brad Member |
posted July 20, 2004 21:26
quote:
IP: Logged |
|
Money_Penny Member |
posted July 20, 2004 21:30
Tina, how about that link now??? IP: Logged |
|
Brad Member |
posted July 20, 2004 21:31
quote: Geez Wallace. I've been nothing but cordial on this board. Even when I disagree with richness and his approach. But now you're saying I said something "stupid". Come now. I read all of your posts. Give me some credit here. I read much more than I contribute to this board (all posts, good or bad) so at least keep me as a subscriber to what you have to say. IP: Logged |
|
Money_Penny Member |
posted July 20, 2004 21:32
Wallace, How many shares exactly do you and richness combined own??? IP: Logged |
|
Wallace#1 Member |
posted July 20, 2004 21:36
Brad, Remember my saying your posts indicated intelligence. "Stupid" was not directed at you. IP: Logged |
|
Money_Penny Member |
posted July 20, 2004 21:36
Brad, in all fairness the "stupid" comment was not directed at you, rather at JBCake47. IP: Logged |
|
Brad Member |
posted July 20, 2004 21:40
quote: Ok, you've kept me as a subscriber. [This message has been edited by Brad (edited July 20, 2004).] IP: Logged |
|
JBCak47 Member |
posted July 20, 2004 21:40
How many MM's do we think have shorted CMKX? We know NITE, JEFF, however what is the deal with Scottrade not allowing BUYS of cmkx, but SELLS? To me, not allowing buys and only sells, limits Scottrade on Naked shorts? What if the MM's raise the price to .05 - .06, unload 1,000,000,000 shares, (possibly THEIR naked shorts that they control), getting like 65 million, lowering the price to sub penny, buying all the shares back, retiring the naked shorts? I am just tying to come up with some scenarios... Money, Your a female?!??!??!? I thought you were a guy (egg on my face!) sorry for the locker room humor, I would have not said anything ,sorry... hehe... I have heard that if you have a Cash account, your shares can not be naked shorts? Anyone? -John- IP: Logged |
|
VNGNTN1 Member |
posted July 20, 2004 21:45
DARREN Great Keep in touch I don't mind promoting it. Paul will be a good person to help. VAN IP: Logged |
This topic is 45 pages long: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 All times are ET (US) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
  |
|
© 1997 - 2004 Allstocks.com. All rights reserved.
Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a
) when we see one... I don't know, there is just something 'attractive' when a girl is... well... dirty. hehehe...