posted June 28, 2004 23:13            

quote:

---

Originally posted by penguinking:
can someone do me a favor find something good on this guy all i seem to find is bad things on this guy.. one bad apple can ruin the bunch dont you agree..

[This message has been edited by penguinking (edited June 28, 2004).]

---

was demonstrated by increasing revenues by 188% in the first year and 268% in the second year as well as doubling the subscriber base.

How is that?

or ( Marcovsky introduced Disney products to Pay Television and laid the foundation for the Disney Channel.

posted June 28, 2004 23:14            

quote:

---

Originally posted by penguinking:
can someone do me a favor find something good on this guy all i seem to find is bad things on this guy.. one bad apple can ruin the bunch dont you agree..

[This message has been edited by penguinking (edited June 28, 2004).]

---

Something good you ask?

The guy's resume reeks with ongoing experience! He's done nothing but win in the media business! Wake up!

"All we have to do is launch!"

posted June 28, 2004 23:14            

quote:

---

Originally posted by casico:
was demonstrated by increasing revenues by 188% in the first year and 268% in the second year as well as doubling the subscriber base.

How is that?

or ( Marcovsky introduced Disney products to Pay Television and laid the foundation for the Disney Channel.

is that enough

---

posted June 28, 2004 23:15            

PLAINTIFFS BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS RESUBMITTED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Below is text extracted from the first page of the corresponding document.
The documents which you purchase will more closely resemble the original paper documents. EXTRACTED KEY WORDS
DEL
MOTION
OOLIE
PLAINTIFFS
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SALE
LAW
STOCK
TNN
ENDERVELT
SALKIND
GOLD
RESUBMITTED MOTION
CHANDLER
NOSTALQIA NETWORK
OPPOSITION
CINCINNATI BELL CELLULAR
PHONE SERVICE
TRANSACTIONS
AGREEMENT
PURCHASE
JACK KENT COOKE
SAM OOLIE
LLP
SHAREHOLDERS
CONNECTION
COMPLAINT
CONTROLLING
MARCOVSKY

/-..
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE li / j
IN AND OF NEW CASTLE COUNTY 1 !j I~/#

_ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X

JACK KENT COOKE, et &,
Plaintiffs,

-against- C.A. No. 11134

SAM OOLIE, et &

Defendants

- and -

THE: NOSTALGIA NETWORK, INC.,

Nominal Defendant. :

PLAINTIFFS' BRIEF IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS'
RESUBMITTED MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ROSENTHAL, MONHAIT, GROSS
& GODDESS, P.A.
Norman M. Monhait, Esquire
Carmella P. Keener, Esquire
Suite 1401, Mellon Bank Center
P.O. Box 1070
Wilmington, DE 19899-1070
(30;!) 656-4433
Attorneys for Plaintiffs

OF COUNSEL:
LAW OF:?ICES OF CURTIS V. TRINKO
310 Madison Avenue
14th F.Loor
New York, NY 10017

ABBEY GARDY & SQUITIERI, LLP
212 East 39th Street
New Yo.rk, NY 10016
212 889-3700

DATED: October 20, 1999

posted June 28, 2004 23:16            

quote:

---

Originally posted by penguinking:
Great do you have a link on that

---

You read it!

As for the launch!

Stay tuned!

posted June 28, 2004 23:17            

quote:

---

Originally posted by casico:
Or how about what we all care about
Marcovsky turned his many years of management experience into significant profits for investors

---

Right on the money Casico!

posted June 28, 2004 23:18            

quote:

---

Originally posted by whizknock:
Right on the money Casico!

---

posted June 28, 2004 23:19            

quote:

---

Originally posted by casico:
There are a lot of ways he can get paid that will not effect the company at all..1 options.. shares of stock in lieu of...even potential of being an investor in his company . They all should be tied to performance of the man....if he performs and makes us money who cares who goes to jail..as long as I sell my stock before they make freinds with BIG LEO

---

True ... but with that I go into my little issue with the difference between investors and traders. I believe some folks here are investors in QBID and some others are traders of the stock. I just hope no one is so much in love with the stock that if the worst were to happen they would not go down with the ship you know?

Just be careful folks and yeah do your own DD. Open up google or get a lexus nexus account. Or whatever floats your boat. Always try to see things from another point of view. Some folks here are perfect examples of devils advocate. Do not automatically assume they are a basher. Instead assume everyone here is a pumper and a basher. Yeah - both. Reading back from Jan till now you can see how some folks were soo pro QBID and now they can barely stand it. Others were so against it and now they love it.

I am glad this board does not have a ignore button for messages. That way I can at least keep my own thoughts in check without 'floating' up up and away ... anyone follow me or should I stop posting for the night?

Oh and of course - my last statement to totally disregard this message and anyone elses. Make up your own mind and write it out. That is the great thing about message boards. Sometimes writing it out helps one come up with the answer they are looking for. Being sheep usually either gets one slaughtered or skinned. I dont think either one is that good but I would rather be skinned than slaughtered.

... "oh yeah and QBID" .. sorry .. inside joke for a few of my lurker friends ...

posted June 28, 2004 23:21            

quote:

---

Originally posted by penguinking:
hey guys have you ever done a resume to look good to the employer of a particular company, to insure yourself getting a job.. A resume is a piece of paper it can say whatever you want .. what i would like to have is prs from previouse emplorers or sec filings that are good with his name on it..

---

posted June 28, 2004 23:23            

Let's all try to keep in perspective just what the word 'advisor' means. He was not given the keys to the kingdom. But just to be sure, let's tie him to a bumper and drag him through some underbrush. How DARE he try to help us!!!

posted June 28, 2004 23:23            

quote:

---

Originally posted by casico:

Are you not getting it? Read the bio it is from his previous employer... I guess anyone can buy stock but it takes a great mind to read what is in front of you...good night

---

posted June 28, 2004 23:23            

quote:

---

Originally posted by sharkus:
True ... but with that I go into my little issue with the difference between investors and traders. I believe some folks here are investors in QBID and some others are traders of the stock. I just hope no one is so much in love with the stock that if the worst were to happen they would not go down with the ship you know?

Just be careful folks and yeah do your own DD. Open up google or get a lexus nexus account. Or whatever floats your boat. Always try to see things from another point of view. Some folks here are perfect examples of devils advocate. Do not automatically assume they are a basher. Instead assume everyone here is a pumper and a basher. Yeah - both. Reading back from Jan till now you can see how some folks were soo pro QBID and now they can barely stand it. Others were so against it and now they love it.

I am glad this board does not have a ignore button for messages. That way I can at least keep my own thoughts in check without 'floating' up up and away ... anyone follow me or should I stop posting for the night?

Oh and of course - my last statement to totally disregard this message and anyone elses. Make up your own mind and write it out. That is the great thing about message boards. Sometimes writing it out helps one come up with the answer they are looking for. Being sheep usually either gets one slaughtered or skinned. I dont think either one is that good but I would rather be skinned than slaughtered.

... "oh yeah and QBID" .. sorry .. inside joke for a few of my lurker friends ...

---

posted June 28, 2004 23:25            

quote:

---

Originally posted by casico:
I truly belive that traders and investors are the same both are lokking to make a profit otherwise why would the care at all

---

Trader and investors are 180% different. Any investment book can tell you the difference. Trader do not care about the longevity of a company, investors do.

posted June 28, 2004 23:25            

quote:

---

Originally posted by casico:
At least one other intelligent person here who can read

---

What's difficult is finding something negative about him. As pointed out before even Bill Gates has been sued. The trick is being able to make people big money even after the suit which in fact he did.

Law suit for this guy just proves he's agressive. I veiw that as a positive. Glad I'm on the ground floor!

Hello! I'm glad I bought more today!

"All we have to do is launch!"

posted June 28, 2004 23:30            

Does the name Michael Marcovsky sound familiar?

He was part of the management team assembled by the Black Education Network to bid on some heartland state cable systems owned by AT&T Broadband (BEN lost out to Bresnan Communications and Mediacom Communications Corp., and it is now suing).

Marcovsky was an interesting choice.

True, his days in the industry go back to Warner Cable's pioneering QUBE interactive-TV system.

But Marcovsky was also CEO of Nostalgia Network, which became embroiled in a financial scandal in 1993, and he was the subject of a Federal Trade Commission action over a telemarketing scheme that investigators charged raised $16.5 million for a leased-access children's cable network and pet network.

BEN president Michele Clark Jenkins said Marcovsky was never an executive of BEN and his participation in the proposal ended before a second round of bidding.

posted June 28, 2004 23:33            

quote:

---

Originally posted by penguinking:
hey oilman can you post that link for me
Thanks for that info..

---

posted June 28, 2004 23:34            

quote:

---

Originally posted by penguinking:
Whiznock, i see your point but finding bad stuff on him was actually quite easy type in his name and do a search and boom all i see is negative.. and i hope that he does turn this thing into a microsoft.. but then again we are not comparing apples to apples. this comparison is like a BMW and a KIA they just dont go together...

---

The hell with MSFT. We won't see that but if he has half the success he had with previous endevors we're in for one hell of a ride!

Just don't forget! Our "Target" audience sports "Half A Trillion Dispsable Income"

We don't even have to hit a bullseye!

Nope!

"All we have to do is launch!"

posted June 28, 2004 23:40            

I think he's going to make us a mint!

posted June 28, 2004 23:42            

quote:

---

Originally posted by penguinking:
i dont think this guy is a good guy..
[b] Defendants falsely represented, expressly or by implication, that all of the general partnerships’ working capital would be used for Children’s Cable Network. In fact, all of the general partnerships’ working capital was not used for Children’s Cable Network. Indeed, defendants transferred at least $650,000 of the general partnerships’ working capital to defendant My Pet TV.
It looks to me like he stole from a kids network that is like stealing from kids what is there to say that he wont steal from the q.[/B]

---

posted June 28, 2004 23:46            

quote:

---

Originally posted by whizknock:
Good guy? Who cares?

I think he's going to make us a mint!

---

posted June 28, 2004 23:47            

I am not trying to fight with anyone im just trying to get answers. as fellow investors i thought you would respect that.

posted June 28, 2004 23:53            

FTC VIOLATIONS: http://www.ftc.gov/os/1998/08/compla.ptv.htm
http://print.google.com/print/doc?articleid=ZdfqcRZqBXK

What's in a name?
By John M. Higgins
Mar 14, 2003

Does the name Michael Marcovsky sound familiar?

He was part of the management team assembled by the Black Education Network to bid on some heartland state cable systems owned by AT&T Broadband (BEN lost out to Bresnan Communications and Mediacom Communications Corp., and it is now suing).

Marcovsky was an interesting choice.

True, his days in the industry go back to Warner Cable's pioneering QUBE interactive-TV system.

But Marcovsky was also CEO of Nostalgia Network, which became embroiled in a financial scandal in 1993, and he was the subject of a Federal Trade Commission action over a telemarketing scheme that investigators charged raised $16.5 million for a leased-access children's cable network and pet network.

BEN president Michele Clark Jenkins said Marcovsky was never an executive of BEN and his participation in the proposal ended before a second round of bidding.

http://print.google.com/print/doc?articleid=f5CtckpUy8D
Nostalgia chair sues burger exex
Variety Staff
Jan 22, 1993

The chairman of Nostalgia Network Inc. is claiming that a fast food franchisee and three of its officers devised a bizarre scheme to get control of his company.

Nostalgia reported late last year that a group of investors might try to take over the company (Daily Variety, Dec. 8, 1992), based on information in a Securities & Exchange Commission filing.

According to a complaint filed in U.S. District Court in Los Angeles on behalf of Gold'n M Television Inc., a company owned by Nostalgia chairman Michael Marcovsky, the defendants got Marcovsky to pledge 1.5 million Nostalgia shares guaranteeing a note executed by Michael E. Kassan, an attorney who had worked for both Nostalgia and defendant M/A Burgers Inc.

Kassan, according to the suit, signed the $ 1.8 million note because of purported financial irregularities at M/A at a time when the defendants "were acutely aware that financial or legal embarrassment to Kassan would impact adversely upon Nostalgia at a critical juncture in its affairs."

The liabilities against Kassan, who is one of the defendants, were contrived the suit said. Last November, Gold'n M was notified that Kassan had not paid the note.

The suit seeks a return of the shares and an injunction against their transfer or use in voting plus unspecified punitive damages. Other defendants included M/A chief executive officer Gary Winnick and president David Lee. M/A operates Rally's Inc. franchises in California and Nevada.

posted June 28, 2004 23:53            

quote:

---

Originally posted by penguinking:
Cisco
hey maybe you should read penny traders posts.... i dont feel like fighting with you since you can come at with me no more than what is on qtelevisons website...

I am not trying to fight with anyone im just trying to get answers. as fellow investors i thought you would respect that.

Hey whizknock i just dont want this guy killing the stock ...

---

posted June 29, 2004 00:03            

how to sink a company in 30 days?

if you want to be shady in your dealling you might as well hire someone that has a track record.

I dont like the nature of the way they placed the message. at a quick glance it looks like a new CEO of the company that was done intentionally.

to many things like this and then the guy himself turns out to be shady

do the dd guys read up on the guy. He basically stole from a kids network. how much of a good guy would do that ****

quote:

---

Originally posted by Booty Quest:
Ooh, more intrigue. Never a dull moment.

Let's all try to keep in perspective just what the word 'advisor' means. He was not given the keys to the kingdom. But just to be sure, let's tie him to a bumper and drag him through some underbrush. How DARE he try to help us!!!

Y'all know I'm teasin'. The detective work has been deep and probing. Just how it should be. Good work!

---

posted June 29, 2004 00:04            

quote:

---

Originally posted by penguinking:
I have been reading this board for a while and there are a few people on this board ie diane, oilman to name some that when ever something bad is brought out they will take the time to address it, because as investors they too want answers.. Cisco if you dont like what i have to say then dont read it..

Hey oilman great email i am sending one right now myself. And oil thank you for taking the time to be respectful enough to help me get to the bottom of this.

---

posted June 29, 2004 00:06            

quote:

---

Originally posted by GatorMan:
I think you understand the game. I just have a different opinion.

If QBID does indeed have guaranteed financing for 5 years that gives it 5 years to build a solid network. That in itself will do all the things you mention, allow it to move off the pinks and have better access to financing. Using some of that money to try to accelerate that process by taking shares off the market seems to me risking ultimate failure. If management is smart they will be more concerned with insuring the network has a solid future and not worry too much about moving the pps higher right now. That will take care of itself. It's long been my opinion that companies in general are too concerned about shareholder value in the short run to set things up for good, solid, long term growth. It's part of the "I want it now" mentality today's shareholders seem to have.

No, I think QBID would be much better off not worrying about share price and focusing on insuring that the network is on a solid financial footing for years to come. Now, that may be different from the goals of a lot of shareholders on this board who are looking for the quick run up so they can dump and move on.

---

I UNDERSTAND WHAT YOU MEAN. I AM NOT LOOKING FOR THE QUICK RUN--IT WILL JUST GO BACK DOWN JUST AS QUICK. I HAVE JUST HEARD SO MUCH ABOUNT THE O/S SHARES. BECAUSE THE COMPANY PUT OUT A PR ABOUT A BUY BACK PROGRAM TO BE PUT IN PLACE--I THOUGHT THAT WAS IMPORTANT. HECK--ALL I WOULD LIKE TO SEE IS .05. LOL TO ME THAT WOULD BE A SUBSTANCIAL RUN. LOL

I WAS OF THE UNDERSTANDING THAT THE COMPANY IS RIGHT NOW TRYING TO KEEP SHARE PRICE DOWN--TO ACCOMPLISH SOME OR BEGINNING OF THE BUY BACK PROGRAM. WHICH WOULD MAKE SENSE TO ME. A RUN UP DOES NOT MAKE SENSE FOR LOTS OF STABILITY REASONS. SOLID FINANCING WOULD NOT BE THAT POSSIBLE IF SHARE PRICE FLUCTUATES FROM .01 TO .10 AND BACK TO .01.

I FEEL LIKE THIS COMPANY WOULD BE, IN A FEW YEARS OR SO AN EXCELLANT BUYING OPPORTUNITY FOR VIACOM OR ESTABLISH SUBSTANCIAL BENIFITS IN STANDING ON IT'S OWN. EITHER WAY. ALL WE HAVE TO DO IS LAUNCH.

AS A DAY TRADER.. THAT WOULD BE GREAT AND I WOULD TAKE ADVANTAGE OF SOME PROFITS--JUST AS WE ALL WOULD. I FEEL LIKE THIS COMPANY--IF LAUNCHED AND HANDLED PROPERLY COULD BE A SOLID INVESTMENT FOR YEARS TO COME.

posted June 29, 2004 00:07            

To have both sides of the discussion is a healthy thing. You cannot always have people agreeing with you. Not everyone that posts disagreement to all the rosy picture that everyone wants to see is a basher. We have to know who is running our company. There is such a thing as security check for board members and even employees that are being done by companies before they allow people to get on board. As a shareholder of the company I would like to know what is good and what is bad so I can make a more objective decision and voice a fairer opinion. Please stop labeling anyone and everyone that says things that might burst your rosy bubble as a basher. And also do not tell one to sell ones shares or get out of Qbid. It is not for you to decide or command.

A company advisor is a paid person either by per diem or by some other form of stipend. Still, bottom line is the person is paid and is linked to the company one way or another. He may not be the CEO but he is in a high enough position to make an impact on the decisions of the company. He will also reflect on the standing of the company in the community. Ergo, it is proper that we check out the credentials of the decision makers of the company in which we are all shareholders. Nothing is free.

quote:

---

Originally posted by casico:
You know this is like the game you played when you were a kid telling someone something and have them tell the next person and so on until it gets to the end..First it does not say he will be the CEO of this company.2nd it does not say they HIRED him..he is only an advisor..probably with money getting connections..Bashers and doubters are everywhere...If you want to sell just do it and leave if not like my girl friend says hang on and enjoy the ride....

---

posted June 29, 2004 00:10            

quote:

---

Originally posted by WinsumLosesum:
Good one, Diana! I L'd out L.

Don't forget $1,000 in QBID last year is now worth $127,000.

401-Q ???

---

LESS THAN 5 MONTHS AGO. LOL

posted June 29, 2004 00:15            

who cares it someone spelled a word wrong. put your effort into dd and you might come up with something more constructive.

posted June 29, 2004 00:50            

Interview Date: 4 June 2004
http://www.************.com/meic.htm

Ok I got busted by the scripts ... try this link instead http://tinyurl.com/2u28d
------------------
78.23% of all statistics are made up on the spot...The other 35% are made up later on.