posted June 15, 2004 16:16            

Not what I posted. I actually picked up my phone and called! The guy that picked up had the Same voice as I heard on the hotline the other day. It was Frank. What I said was true to the heart. I am one who hates listening to other people and need to know for myself.

And heres to you penguinking.

doobeedoobeedoo.

quote:

---

Originally posted by penguinking:
I AM THE ONE AND ONLY PENGUINKING

---

posted June 15, 2004 16:16            

quote:

---

Originally posted by kbpkt:
It the same name I've used on Allstocks for 4 years, but no, not a real name. Not everyone can have an origianl name like Bob

---

HAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHA

OK now that one made me laugh....

posted June 15, 2004 16:17            

quote:

---

Originally posted by realityinc21:

BOB--I AM GOING TO ASSUME THE PEOPLE WHO DON'T SHOW UP ANYMORE HAVE BEEN THE SAME PERSON???

---

posted June 15, 2004 16:22            

I'm done for the night - See you all tomm. morning. Go Relax a little

quote:

---

Originally posted by WinsumLosesum:
Bob said that in the case of multiple screennames, the screenname with the most posts will remain... this time. So, while we may notice some missing names, we won't really know who the real culprits are. They will still be among us, but only have the one screenname.

[This message has been edited by WinsumLosesum (edited June 15, 2004).]

---

posted June 15, 2004 16:23            

Pumpers and Dumpers get your trust then convince you to buy while they are selling and getting your money from the increase.

If they have enough shares, they can even manipulate the price enough to get others to buy.

Just be aware that this is no at all uncommon on Pennystock boards and everyone should be extremely cautious as to who they listen to.

posted June 15, 2004 16:23            

quote:

---

Originally posted by WinsumLosesum:
Bob said that in the case of multiple screennames, the screenname with the most posts will remain... this time. So, while we may notice some missing names, we won't really know who the real culprits are. They will still be among us, but only have the one screenname.

[This message has been edited by WinsumLosesum (edited June 15, 2004).]

---

Yup - they will still be among us ... but we may notice a few of the new comers (less than a month of being here but posting quite a bit) go away...

posted June 15, 2004 16:27            

quote:

---

Originally posted by StonedPigeon:
Maybe we need a secret hand shake

---

YOU MEAN A SECRET PICKLE SHAKE?? WELL THAT LETS ME OUT TOO. &*&^%

posted June 15, 2004 16:28            

quote:

---

Originally posted by StonedPigeon:
Are you sure it an egg?

---

HHAHAHA ok that one made me laugh too ...

Well I am off - got some work to do - see you all later tonight ...

posted June 15, 2004 16:29            

quote:

---

Originally posted by StonedPigeon:
Are you sure it an egg?

---

posted June 15, 2004 16:45            

quote:

---

Originally posted by sharkus:

Dunno - you said you called the PR firm right? What did they say to you?

---

THEY SAID "WE ARE THE PR FIRM FOR Q TELEVISION NETWORK AND WE DO THEIR PR,S"

I posted that three times now. With the phone #504-949-3999.

That's why I got agrivated because someone else came back and said they called and were told that they did not write PR.

Someone else comes on and say's Frank wrote it!!

I know I called and said what was told to me.

I know I am me!! Insane but me!! One name and one e-mail for about 10 years now. Or there abouts. Just boderline personality disorder. (by the way--that is a joke). Is that discrimination? Does it count that I am traveling around the world???

What happen's if I use my friends computer instead of my laptop?

I really want to know the answer...

posted June 15, 2004 16:51            

Right before the hard launch date this stock will fly. So just keep hold your breath we have about 4 weeks left before the REAL TRUTH COME OUT WITH QBID.

Diana this is riding on your shoulders BIG TIME!!!!!!

posted June 15, 2004 16:54            

quote:

---

Originally posted by realityinc21:
YOU MEAN A SECRET PICKLE SHAKE?? WELL THAT LETS ME OUT TOO. &*&^%

---

No, I don't think we need to have a secret handshake, just throw out the garbage. Those know who they are.I don't have to post to read.

posted June 15, 2004 16:55            

Thanks for asking the questions others are afraid to ask.

posted June 15, 2004 17:01            

quote:

---

Originally posted by justplayin:
Futures, great post. I must caution you that others have stated some of the same questions (not all at once) and have been slammed.

Thanks for asking the questions others are afraid to ask.

---

posted June 15, 2004 17:01            

Anyway, to the really new newbies out there who read my post "buy the rumor - sell the news", that is ONLY one of gazillion ways that traders MAY trade a stock. It is not set in stone. QBID just has a good track record for this.

As you watch a stock you will see a trend develope for it, daytraders analize one way... the investors and/or monthly traders may analize a completely different way.

You will often see the reverse of the "buy the rumor - sell the news" rule of thumb.

You'll get the feel for it after a few months. I imagine it will take awhile to really feel comfortable... I know I'm years away!

posted June 15, 2004 17:02            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Krecik1:
Allstocks,

My vote is that IP's be revealed as they were this afternoon on all current and past posts. Since there are no legal reasons to hide it this should not be a problem? Correct? I think everyone would like see what I saw this afternoon. I would also like more time to determine who I should trust and who I shouldn't. Everyone would just have to understand that just because two names have the same IP it may not be a dishonest attempt at hiding something , it could just mean a shared internet connection. Also , just because two names do not have the same IP does not mean they are not the same person. I have 2 usernames - 1 from work and 1 from home due to a forgoten password. I obviously did not try to hide anything , I am krecik and krecik1. So how about doing everyone a favor and let everyone see who has been a problem and who has not.

---

I AM INSANE AND NOW RETARDED. I WOULD NOT KNOW WHAT AN IP # WAS. BUT I VOTE WITH YOU. CAUSE MANY OF YOU ON THIS BOARD WILL KNOW AND THEN WILL TELL THE REST OF US THAT DON''T UNDERSTAND.

MY VOTE YES--SHOW IT ALL.

------------------
DIANA

posted June 15, 2004 17:12            

I have not seen anyone stating that it would be a bad idea so how about it Alstock

show us your secrets.

it may let your pps go up lol

and by the way i know that there are millions of penny traders but i am the only Penny-trader

posted June 15, 2004 17:17            

Luckily, I am not in it, but good to spread the word.

posted June 15, 2004 17:17            

Sharing DD is great but pumping does no one any good. it has to grow on real info and real foundation.

GLTA that are still holding

Penny-Trader

quote:

---

Originally posted by justplayin:
Futures, great post. I must caution you that others have stated some of the same questions (not all at once) and have been slammed.

Thanks for asking the questions others are afraid to ask.

---

posted June 15, 2004 17:18            

quote:

---

Originally posted by kbpkt:
I know its not the appropriate thread, but anyone who owns IBZT should check out the PR that just came out. Looks like tomorrow is going to be a huge sell off/down day.

---

posted June 15, 2004 17:22            

I understand where you are comming from, but in answer to one of your questions, they are under legal contract NOT to explain the situations of the deals in progress and ones that are signed, until the 21st or 22nd of June. This is purely legal reasons and MUST be followed in order for any such deals to finished. If they breech the contract they lose the deal. This is why they wont speak until they are allowed.

In refernce to the O/S count. Yes they did say by May, mid-May infact. However they are under control of a Public Relations firm that may have stepped in and said not to release that data yet.

The company wants to become fully reporting, hence these strategic moves. In order to be fully reporting and move off the OTCBB/Pink sheets and onto something bigger, they need to report.

The Q-Television Network also annouced they will do a limited share buy back. Perhaps it is still on going? Perhaps it ended a while ago. I am not sure. Perhaps they are waiting to release it at a better share price? 10% increase if it is good news will do more for the early investors when the price is at .12 versus .012

However not many pink sheets are carrying out a buy back of shares.

Frank Olsen also annouced, with a board vote, NO REVERSE SPLIT, in the forseeable future.

They have interest from institutional companies.

1. The Q-Television stock has risen over 12,000% since Feb. 2004.

2. The Network has annouced a limited stock buy back.

3. The Q-Television board has voted on NO REVERSE SPLIT.

4. The company has teamed with Barbara LaMonte, a notible figure in the Broadcasting field. She speaks over six languages.

5. The Q-Television Network annouced that NTI, a satellite UPLINK/DOWNLINK signal distribution company will handle the technical aspects of transmitting the Q-Television signal upto the Telestar satellite, in which it will be downlinked to all available satellite and cable provieds in NORTH AMERICA, including CANADA, MEXICO and part of the Carribiean (sp?).

6. The Q-Television network will charge a preium to access its broadcast, limiting the viewability to those who want it. Therefore it will not be 'shoved' into heterosexual peoples homes. The cable company will also collect part of the subsciption rate. Each cable company will recivie funds for every customer who watches. Viacomm's LOGO Network will be carried on basic packages. This is already causing controversy.

7. The Q-Television Network has hired a leading Public Relations firm to handle news releases and press issues. This company has had Direct TV as a client and has access to noteable, prominent individuals and companies.

8. Q-Television has an updated website.

9. On May first thru the fourth, the network attended the an industry held convention where the Q-Television network exposed itself to many cable and industry leaders.

10. The Q-Television Network launched a Test Signal on May 15th, which was broadcast, in clear, unscambled signals, to C-Band Satellite dish owners as well as to all cable/satellite providers. In addition, the signal was carried over two broadcast providers.

A. The first provider was Comcast Cable in the Washington State/Seattle area.
B. The second provider was Cox Cable in New Orleans, which is home to a rathe rlarge Gay market.

The five hour broadcast included a selection of content including an orginal documentary highlighting the Nationwide Gay Marriage events.

The Test Signal was a complete success.

Durring this time, news clips and spots have began to appear in numerous news sources.

11. On June 1st, The Q-Television began its Industry Soft Launch which will allow Cable providers, as well as Satellite providers, access to a block of programming, on going throughout the whole month of June.

12. Frank Olsen has annouced he has closed five meetings in New York, with ten others in open discussion.

Additionally, the company has open an office in New York City which will include secretaries to handle the operations for the East Coast area. They havee also hired a person who will help them with an advertising campaign.

13. The Q-Television Network plans to launch an advertising Campaign at the end of June, which will be a nationwide, multi-city event.

14. The Q-Television Network has access to film crews at any time, in major US cities. These film crews will give the network footage for their news segements, comentaries, documentaries as well as for concerts, events, parties, and festiviles and parades.

15. The company plans to launch the network to the consumer in July, which is about two weeks away.

posted June 15, 2004 17:22            

quote:

---

Originally posted by sarki316:
All you people that own QBID have to remeber 1 thing IF they don't get a carrier for there services you can kiss this stock good bye. I know alot of Gay people that work in the market and they are waiting for QBID to launch before they get in. If frank Olsen has 1 more deal left in him it is QBID getting a carrier and GOOD one not a small ass one.

Right before the hard launch date this stock will fly. So just keep hold your breath we have about 4 weeks left before the REAL TRUTH COME OUT WITH QBID.

Diana this is riding on your shoulders BIG TIME!!!!!!

Joey from Brooklyn

---

I AM PRETTY SMALL--BUT TOUGH--I THINK I CAN HANDLE IT. I HAVE POSTED ALL THE DD I KNOW AND CAN FIND.

I AM SORRY I GOT SO AGGRIVATED EARLIER--I JUST GET CONFUSED WITH ALL THE BS--THEN I GET MAD. WITH ALL THIS WHO IS WHO CRAP.

I KNOW WHO I AM I JUST CAN'T FIGURE ANYTHING ELSE OUT.

SO I GUESS I WILL STOP TRYING. I AM GOING TO GO SURF THE GAY WEB. NO BASHERS THERE. I AM KINDA STARTING TO LIKE IT. LOL

posted June 15, 2004 18:34            

quote:

---

Originally posted by JBCak47:
futuresobjective:

I understand where you are comming from, but in answer to one of your questions, they are under legal contract NOT to explain the situations of the deals in progress and ones that are signed, until the 21st or 22nd of June. This is purely legal reasons and MUST be followed in order for any such deals to finished. If they breech the contract they lose the deal. This is why they wont speak until they are allowed.
In refernce to the O/S count. Yes they did say by May, mid-May infact. However they are under control of a Public Relations firm that may have stepped in and said not to release that data yet.
The company wants to become fully reporting, hence these strategic moves. In order to be fully reporting and move off the OTCBB/Pink sheets and onto something bigger, they need to report.
The Q-Television Network also annouced they will do a limited share buy back. Perhaps it is still on going? Perhaps it ended a while ago. I am not sure. Perhaps they are waiting to release it at a better share price? 10% increase if it is good news will do more for the early investors when the price is at .12 versus .012
However not many pink sheets are carrying out a buy back of shares.
Frank Olsen also annouced, with a board vote, NO REVERSE SPLIT, in the forseeable future.
They have interest from institutional companies.
1. The Q-Television stock has risen over 12,000% since Feb. 2004.
2. The Network has annouced a limited stock buy back.
3. The Q-Television board has voted on NO REVERSE SPLIT.
4. The company has teamed with Barbara LaMonte, a notible figure in the Broadcasting field. She speaks over six languages.
5. The Q-Television Network annouced that NTI, a satellite UPLINK/DOWNLINK signal distribution company will handle the technical aspects of transmitting the Q-Television signal upto the Telestar satellite, in which it will be downlinked to all available satellite and cable provieds in NORTH AMERICA, including CANADA, MEXICO and part of the Carribiean
6. The Q-Television network will charge a preium to access its broadcast, limiting the viewability to those who want it. Therefore it will not be 'shoved' into heterosexual peoples homes. The cable company will also collect part of the subsciption rate. Each cable company will recivie funds for every customer who watches. Viacomm's LOGO Network will be carried on basic packages. This is already causing controversy.
7. The Q-Television Network has hired a leading Public Relations firm to handle news releases and press issues. This company has had Direct TV as a client and has access to noteable, prominent individuals and companies.
8. Q-Television has an updated website.
9. On May first thru the fourth, the network attended the an industry held convention where the Q-Television network exposed itself to many cable and industry leaders.
10. The Q-Television Network launched a Test Signal on May 15th, which was broadcast, in clear, unscambled signals, to C-Band Satellite dish owners as well as to all cable/satellite providers. In addition, the signal was carried over two broadcast providers.
A. The first provider was Comcast Cable in the Washington State/Seattle area.
B. The second provider was Cox Cable in New Orleans, which is home to a rathe rlarge Gay market.
The five hour broadcast included a selection of content including an orginal documentary highlighting the Nationwide Gay Marriage events.
The Test Signal was a complete success.
Durring this time, news clips and spots have began to appear in numerous news sources.
11. On June 1st, The Q-Television began its Industry Soft Launch which will allow Cable providers, as well as Satellite providers, access to a block of programming, on going throughout the whole month of June.
12. Frank Olsen has annouced he has closed five meetings in New York, with ten others in open discussion.
Additionally, the company has open an office in New York City which will include secretaries to handle the operations for the East Coast area. They havee also hired a person who will help them with an advertising campaign.
13. The Q-Television Network plans to launch an advertising Campaign at the end of June, which will be a nationwide, multi-city event.
14. The Q-Television Network has access to film crews at any time, in major US cities. These film crews will give the network footage for their news segements, comentaries, documentaries as well as for concerts, events, parties, and festiviles and parades.
15. The company plans to launch the network to the consumer in July, which is about two weeks away.
-John

---

I see how you can think, as I did, that they are under legal contract. In fact one of the past two times (this is the third attempt) they tried to launch they blew a deal they allegedly had with a carrier. I say allegedy because if I remember it correctly, that company denied that it ever had a deal. they were in talks.

In reference to your reference to the OS count (lol) They are not under the control of a pr firm. The PR firm in under control of them. I have only seen two pr's with devany's name on it? maybe I missed one, however these pr's are coming from the q.

This company might want to become fully reporting but I see no proof to them even suggesting that. please correct me if I am wrong, I would like to know. If they do want to move off of the pinks, one would think they would begin by lettng their investors in on things, such as the os count.

Keep in mind that the announced buy back really means nothing for a pink until after it is completed. There is no regulation for thigns like that. They can say anything they want (as far as I know) regarding a buyback and they have no reason to follow through with it. they can say it every day and it does not mean a thing until after it has happened.

Frank did announce no R/S.

They have interest from institutional companies<--- nobody I know... nobody even worth mentioning IMO

1. The Q-Television stock has risen over 12,000% since Feb. 2004.<-- so have many other companies. that does not mean much anymore... it only meant something when you were at the bottom... now I am afraid there is all that way back down.. where before at 0.0001 the only way to lose money was through a r/s or if they folded.

2. The Network has annouced a limited stock buy back.<- again they can announce this but it means nothing until after it is completed. I do recall reading or hearing somewhere that it will not start until oct. 4 months or more away. when is their launch? a couple of weeks?

3. The Q-Television board has voted on NO REVERSE SPLIT.

4. The company has teamed with Barbara LaMonte, a notible figure in the Broadcasting field. She speaks over six languages.<--- Between my and my sister we speak 9 languages. your point? Last I checked you had to pay for her services? Also checked out that companies website... I am sad to say my screen almost cracked it was so ugly, and poorly designed.

5. The Q-Television Network annouced that NTI, a satellite UPLINK/DOWNLINK signal distribution company will handle the technical aspects of transmitting the Q-Television signal upto the Telestar satellite, in which it will be downlinked to all available satellite and cable provieds in NORTH AMERICA, including CANADA, MEXICO and part of the Carribiean (sp?).<-- again I think you have to pay for those services. and until I see this thing airing how do I know they are not there to make sure the pulg doesn't fall out?

6. The Q-Television network will charge a preium to access its broadcast, limiting the viewability to those who want it. Therefore it will not be 'shoved' into heterosexual peoples homes. The cable company will also collect part of the subsciption rate. Each cable company will recivie funds for every customer who watches. Viacomm's LOGO Network will be carried on basic packages. This is already causing controversy.<-- I am over that, it seems to me that viacom has take a lot of heat over their network chanel logo, and still they are able to offer true advertisers. We are going to attempt to charge people, and a few days before we launch, we have no clue what any of our shows will be, not clue what kind of moves( aside form the three on their website), and nothing in place that should be in place well before you launch a network, From all that I have read at least. I am starting to think they want to launch this and then try to get advertisers and carriers. IMO they are way to behind on bringing this thing *online*.

7. The Q-Television Network has hired a leading Public Relations firm to handle news releases and press issues. This company has had Direct TV as a client and has access to noteable, prominent individuals and companies.<-- they ahve hired a pr firm that they have used (from what I saw) twice. no big deal there. I cant see any progress made for the q by this firm.

8. Q-Television has an updated website.<-- nothing to write home about. take a look at logo's its up and its 100% better than q's. P.S., who did they get to build it? its a badly designed site, by amatuers in my opinion.

9. On May first thru the fourth, the network attended the an industry held convention where the Q-Television network exposed itself to many cable and industry leaders.<-- yes they did, I was excited about this. However I have seen no progress because of this. have you? its just not there.

10. The Q-Television Network launched a Test Signal on May 15th, which was broadcast, in clear, unscambled signals, to C-Band Satellite dish owners as well as to all cable/satellite providers. In addition, the signal was carried over two broadcast providers. <-- that signal was anything buy clear from what I remember. Also they had to pay for this signal to go out. on top of that they never supplied investors with information on # of actual viewers, which once again I am afraid I heard them mention they would.

A. The first provider was Comcast Cable in the Washington State/Seattle area.
B. The second provider was Cox Cable in New Orleans, which is home to a rathe rlarge Gay market.<--- right they payed for this, much like ron popeil(sp?) pays to advertise his pasta maker.

The five hour broadcast included a selection of content including an orginal documentary highlighting the Nationwide Gay Marriage events.<-- yes it did. turn on the news, until last week gay marriages where all over the place. I also remember reading somewhere that the movie was also airing on another companies channel... but I might be wrong.

The Test Signal was a complete success.<-- the test signal was a test signal, how can you say it was a success when you have nothing to tell you it was? no feedback from viewers, no anything.

Durring this time, news clips and spots have began to appear in numerous news sources. <---- I have seen a few posts, mostly blots of info, that nobody will see but the investor looking for it. not impressed yet.

11. On June 1st, The Q-Television began its Industry Soft Launch which will allow Cable providers, as well as Satellite providers, access to a block of programming, on going throughout the whole month of June.<--- yest they did, I still have no idea how that is going. do you? I mean do your really?

12. Frank Olsen has annouced he has closed five meetings in New York, with ten others in open discussion. <--- they have not been turned down, closing a meeting does not mean to me that we have contrcacts... until I see that we have them I would not assume so.

Additionally, the company has open an office in New York City which will include secretaries to handle the operations for the East Coast area. They havee also hired a person who will help them with an advertising campaign. <-- ny office. I will check it out when they find the time to open it. its not open yet. Also, I thought devany is heling them with their advertising and carriers? I see no proof of anything yet. you cant if your eyes are open.

13. The Q-Television Network plans to launch an advertising Campaign at the end of June, which will be a nationwide, multi-city event.<-- still to be seen, why are they waiting until days before they launch? A company as large as viacom is doing it a year ahead of time, and they dont have to. the q, I would think does.

14. The Q-Television Network has access to film crews at any time, in major US cities. These film crews will give the network footage for their news segements, comentaries, documentaries as well as for concerts, events, parties, and festiviles and parades.<--- give me a day and a couple of grand, I will have access as well. it was news when it came out, but not any longer.

15. The company plans to launch the network to the consumer in July, which is about two weeks away.<---july is two weeks away or so, why do we have no information, no advertisers (aside from gotchocolates and mikkee), why do we have no information about anything that at least I require to consider this a sound investment? when it comes down to it, we really have no information, that provides any idea of how well, poorly they are doing.

Please don't consider my post a bach, even though it may sound like one. These are my concerns and my thoughts towards JBCak47's post.
JBCak47 in no way am I trying to make you change your mind, I am just putting out what I see as relavant information regarding your reply to my post. your reply in itself is very much apreciated. Best of luck to you.

posted June 15, 2004 18:39            

quote:

---

Originally posted by kbpkt:
whoa, we just had a big earthquake here in San Diego

---

posted June 15, 2004 18:41            

quote:

---

Originally posted by 1BigTip:
Hasn't shown up here yet.
http://www.iris.edu/seismon/

---

it just happened, check in a minute, it'll be there

posted June 15, 2004 18:48            

Now the news is saying it was 3 earthquakes that happened within seconds, one on the San Diego border, one in the dessert outside San Diego, and one in neighboring Riverside county

posted June 15, 2004 19:59            

quote:

---

Originally posted by darogo:
great post futures. all valid concerns. i agree with most of them. i also think that frank and co. will be able to get the pps higher within the next few weeks. with the release of cable/satellite carriers, advertisers and their own advertising campaign, i still expect the pps to rise. i still think that people who weren't aware of the stock WILL be made aware. we all might not be millionaires, but i still think there's money to be made with this stock.

i think people just need to play this level-headed....

---

posted June 15, 2004 20:07            

They still have not posted the new guys resume on the web page. Guess they really do not care how they look to the rest of the investor community since as people have stated they see the QBID news under Viacom news as well.

posted June 15, 2004 20:22            

TO KENDRA AND DEVENY STAFF:
TO TRIANGLE MULTI MEDIA:
TO THE INVESTORS IN THIS STOCK HOLDING MILLIONS OF SHARES WORTH MILLIONS OF DOLLARS:
FIRST OF ALL THIS IS NOT DIRECTED AT ANYONE IN ANY WAY SHAPE OR FORM. THIS IS DIRECTED AT THE CREDIBILITY AND VALIDITY OF QBID.
I AND HUNDREDS OF OTHERS HAVE BEEN BEHIND THIS COMPANY SINCE FEBRUARY 2, 2004 WHEN THE SHARE PRICE WAS @ .0001. WE NEED, WANT AND DESERVE SOME ANSWERS TO OUR QUESTIONS.
THERE IS NO WAY A HARD LAUNCH DATE CAN BE GIVEN. 1 MONTH TO 1 MONTH AND A HALF AFTER THE SOFT LAUNCH IS WHAT HAS BEEN PROJECTED. THAT PROJECTION IS GIVEN ON THE TIME FRAME OF OTHER NETWORKS LAUNCHING AFTER BEING PICKED UP BY A CABLE OR SATELLITE COMPANY.
WE CAN NOT GENERALIZE. ....SPECULATION ON FACTS IS ACCEPTABLE. WE ALL HAVE OPINIONS.
QTV HAS TO BE PICKED UP BY A CABLE OR SATELLITE COMPANY--TO LAUNCH AT ALL....THEY HAVE TO BE PICKED UP BY ADVERTISING COMPANIES. THAT IS PURPOSE OF SOFT LAUNCH AND THE ATTENDANCE AT THE NETWORK CONVENTION IN NEW ORLEANS.
TO DO SO THIS COMPANY (QTV) NEEDS TO VALIDATE SHARE PRICE, VOLUME, SEC FILINGS, INCOME STATEMENTS ETC ETC. HENCE, REASON FOR HIRING MISS LAMONT AND CONTRACTING DEVENY PR FIRM....VALIDATION--PROMOTION--CONTRACTUAL EXPERIENCE--ADVERTISING RESOURCES.. YADA YADA
IF WE AS A GROUP ( A BIG GROUP) CAN NOT STAND BEHIND THE COMPANY--IE. VALIDATE SHARE PRICE AND CORRECT INFORMATION THEN THE CHANCES FOR THEM TO LAUNCH AT ALL DECREASES DUE TO OUR INCOMPETENCE TO PUT OUT CORRECT INFORMATION. IF THEY CAN NOT GIVE US ACCURATE AND COMPETITENT INFORMATION THEN HOW CAN WE BACK UP THEIR COMPANY???
EVERYONE HERE IS THINKING. WE ARE ONLY A SMALL GROUP OF SHARE HOLDERS.. WHAT WE DO AND SAY IS A DROP IN THE BUCKET.. WRONG...I AM GETTING E-MAILS FROM ALL OVER THE WORLD IN REPLY TO E-MAILS I SENT OUT MONTHS AGO. PEOPLE LAUGHING AND SAYING "WELL THIS LOOKS FAMILIAR." BECAUSE IT STARTED RIGHT HERE.
EVERYBODY HERE REACHES OUT TO OTHERS AND OTHERS REACH OUT TO OTHERS.
SMALL STATEMENTS LIKE "I DON'T TAKE ANYTHING THEY SAY AS 100%" REFLECTS ON THE VALIDITY OF THIS COMPANY. THOUSANDS AND THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE READ THIS AND REPOST SOMEWHERE ELSE. WITH AN AVERAGE OF 1/2 TO 3/4 OF A BILLION SHARES TRADED DAILY..AND SOMETIMES IN THE BILLIONS OF SHARES TRADED..SOMEONE OUT THERE IS LISTENING.
I AM NOT TRYING TO OFFEND ANYONE. JUST TRYING TO MAKE A BUCK AND KEEP IT REAL.
IF ANY ONE OF YOU THOUGHT THAT I HAVE A TEMPER AND/OR AM AGGRESSIVE WITH MY COMMENTS, YOU ARE CORRECT. THAT WAS NOTHING AND I MEAN NOTHING COMPARED TO THE E-MAIL I JUST SENT TO FRANK WITH COPY TO DEVENY FIRM. IN SHORT I KINDLY EXPLAINED TO THEM THAT IF THEY CHOOSE TO MAKE THIS WORK HE HAS TO HIRE COMPETENT EMPLOYEE'S AND TRAIN THEM WITH ADEQUATE AND ACCURATE INFORMATION TO GIVE TO THE PUBLIC. HE NEEDS TO MEET HIS DEADLINES. HE NEEDS BE PROFESSIONAL. HE NEEDS TO INFORM US OF THE O/S. HE NEEDS TO HIRE A COMPETENT ATTORNEY AND ACCOUNTANT TO FILE APPROPRIATE SEC REQUIREMENTS. HE NEEDS TO DECIDE IF DEVENY IS PUTTING OUT PRESS RELEASES OR IF HE IS. HE NEEDS TO INFORM US OF THE SHARE BUY BACK PROGRAM. HE NEEDS TO SET UP AN APPROPRIATE AND PROFESSIONAL WEB SITE. HE OBVIOUSLY HAS SOME BACKING EITHER INDEPENDENTLY, PRIVATELY OR CORPORATE AND WE NEED TO BE INFORMED AS TO WHAT STAGE OF THE GAME HE IS AT-- AND LASTLY HE NEEDS TO INFORM ME RIGHT HERE AND RIGHT NOW IF THIS IS BULLs*&T OR DOES HE HAVE ANY INTENTION OF MAKING THIS WORK BECAUSE I AM NOT GOING TO WASTE ANY MORE OF MY TIME ON THIS VENTURE IF HE IS NOT GOING TO DO WHAT HE SAYS. HE FAILED AT THIS BUSINESS VENTURE ONCE BEFORE AND THERE IS ABSOLUTELY NO ROOM FOR ERROR THIS TIME AROUND.
I INFORMED HIM THAT: BEING CEO OF A COMPANY HE DOES HAVE SHARES IN THAT COMPANY THAT HE COULD SELL TO GAIN THE CAPITAL TO RETAIN THE STAFF THAT HE NEEDS. BEING CONSERVATIVELY FRUGAL IS ONE THING AND F*&*ING WITH MY TIME AND MY MONEY WAS ANOTHER. IF HE WANTS TO PLAY THE SHELL GAME--THAT IS JUST FINE WITH ME. I CAN PLAY THAT GAME RIGHT WITH THE BEST OF THEM. SO WHICH ONE IS IT FRANK? RISK OR TRIVIAL PURSUIT?
GRANTED HE HAS SET UP THE HOT LINE-- HIRED A GOOD PR. FIRM-- PUT OUT FAIRLY DECENT PRESS RELEASES--TELLING US ONLY WHAT WE ALREADY KNOW. EXECUTED THE SHOWING AT THE NETWORK CONVENTION WITH SUCCESS-- CONTRACTED WITH TIME WARNER--SET UP SOME PROGRAMMING AND ARRANGED COMPLETION OF DOCUMENTARY WITH JOE TORRES ON GAY/LESBIAN MARRIAGES--THE SOFT LAUNCH PROGRAMMING IS FINISHED AND IN FACT WAS AIRING AT THE CONVENTION ON PLASMA SCREEN TV'S--SO WHY THE TWO WEEK DELAY? WAS THAT REALLY THE SOLT LAUNCH ON THE 15TH OF MAY? SINCE NO MENTION OF SOFT LAUNCH WAS MADE IN THE HOTLINE UPDATE. ONLY THE HARD LAUNCH IN JULY.
I INFORMED HIM THAT HE HAS REALLY DONE NOTHING THAT I COULD NOT HAVE DONE IN TWO WEEKS TIME SETTING BEHIND A DESK WITH A COMPUTER AND A TELEPHONE/FAX MACHINE. IN GENERAL QTV HAS NOT MET THE SOFT LAUNCH DEADLINE WHICH IN FACT IS THE MOST IMPORTANT ISSUE IN HAND. WHY IS IT NOT BEING BROADCASTED BY A DECENT NETWORK SYSTEM SO THAT THE PEOPLE HE IS TRYING TO ATTRACT WILL BE ABLE TO SEE IT? OUR CONCERN.. IS THIS PATTERN OF INCONSISTENCIES AND DEADLINE DELAYS GOING TO CONTINUE?
I DO UNDERSTAND THAT IT HAD BEEN QUITE HECTIC. I INFORMED HIM THAT "FRANK, THAT IS YOUR JOB TO CONTROL UPRISING SITUATIONS AS CEO OF QTV. NO ONE SAID IT WOULD BE EASY."
I DID NOT E-MAIL YOU FOR EXCUSES I E-MAILED YOU FOR ANSWERS." I DO EXPECT A PROMPT RESPONSE. ONE FROM YOURSELF AND ONE FROM DEVENY PR FIRM.
I FEEL LIKE FRANK IS IN OVER HIS HEAD. SETTING UP THE SATELLITE FOR SOFT LAUNCH TESTING HAD TAKEN LONGER THAN HE EXPECTED. NOT JUST EVERYONE IS WILLING TO CONTRACT WITH GAY/LESBIAN TV NETWORK. HE SHOULD HAVE HIRED MORE STAFF MONTHS AGO. HE SHOULD HAVE HAD MISS LAMONT ON BOARD MONTHS AGO. HE SHOULD HAVE HIRED A PR. FIRM MONTHS AGO. HE SHOULD HAVE MADE SURE HE HAD SATELLITE SYSTEMS SET UP BEFORE HE SET A DATE FOR LAUNCH. IN SHORT, IF HE DOES NOT KNOW WHAT HE IS DOING THEN HE NEEDS TO HIRE ADEQUATE STAFF THAT DOES. I KNOW THAT FRANK WANTS TO LAUNCH QTV. HE HAS THE CONCEPTUAL IDEA'S FORMED BUT IS HE UNDER MANNED AND UNDER STAFFED AT THIS TIME TO MAKE THIS A REALITY. BASICALLY, I POINTED OUR THAT THE BALL STARTED ROLLING AND HE IS UNABLE TO KEEP UP. SINCE HIRING EXTRA STAFF RECENTLY THINGS HAVE BEEN BETTER BUT TOTALLY INSANE AS FAR AS THE WORK LOAD. COMMON SENSE TELLS ME THIS. HIRING THE PR. FIRM SHOULD LIGHTEN THAT LOAD. FRANK GENUINELY SEEMS INTENT ON MAKING THIS WORK. MY CONCERN IS CAN HE?
IMHO--IT CAN BE VERY OVERWHELMING THE IMMENSITY OF THE PROJECT HE HAS UNDERTAKEN. FRANK DOES NOT SEEM TO HAVE THE SELF ESTEEM NOR THE COMPETENCY THAT A PERSON I WOULD EXPECT AS A CEO OF A TV NETWORK. IN SHORT, FRANK IS DEFINITELY NO TED TURNER. FRANK SEEMS TO FRAGILE AND CONCERNED OVER TRIVIAL MATTERS. IF HE CAN'T GET QTV LAUNCHED THERE ARE SEVERAL COMPANIES COMING RIGHT BEHIND HIM THAT WILL. VIACOM BEING AT THE HEAD OF THE LIST.
WELL THERE IT IS FOLKS..I LAID DOWN THE FACTS. WE WILL WAIT FOR THE RETURN E-MAIL OR CALL.

posted June 15, 2004 21:45            

Thank you.

posted June 15, 2004 21:59            

Please Let the IP Addresses be shown.!!!!

The DragonMaster

Mike

posted June 15, 2004 22:59            

1) Is it still true that there are two types of IP addresses...static and dynamic? Static addressing is simply addressing that is unique to the user because it is a hard fixed connection such as a cable or an identifiable signal. Dynamic addressing is also unique to the user with the difference being that static addressing is permanent and dynamic is random and changes often.

2) In the case of static addressing, would it not then be as CouchP states, a matter of security. It would be the same as posting your home address or possibly even worse since many home computers contain the family's financial data etc.

3) Site moderating is no easy task. Every moderator has horror stories and problems that may or may not be containable. A serious hacker...basher...trouble maker will not have a static IP address. So identifying them and policing them is still a virtual nigtmare.

I would appreciate someone with up to date expertise speak to my post. I'm hoping that technology once again has passed me by and that there are new and improved methods of containment.

posted June 15, 2004 23:32            

quote:

---

Originally posted by realityinc21:
I AM INSANE AND NOW RETARDED. I WOULD NOT KNOW WHAT AN IP # WAS.

---

posted June 15, 2004 23:52            

quote:

---

Originally posted by StonedPigeon:
Bone what isp do you use?

---

posted June 15, 2004 23:55            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Smctbone:
Unfortunately I'm stuck with AOL

---

--------------------------------------------

well there ya go then

I'm aol
your aol
diana aol

seems to me people that live in the same
town have the same area code