posted
Whats this stock doing? OK, we have had .0001 for the last 4 days or so and he volume has been of the chart. Did the MM's take a mid-year vacation on this on? Will it start moving anytime soon?
Do we see another pop to .0008?
Posts: 276 | Registered: Feb 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
we've been at .0001 for 2 months now, i think, maybe close to 3? and we usually get atleast 1-2billion in volume every day, hopefully Mr. Fan will change that
Posts: 664 | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
pop? not to sound negative, but i don't think this has had a pop in well over a year, and has no signs of one either. maybe once the new management can get settled something will happen, but don't count on a pr to move this thing.
Posts: 22 | From: los angeles | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
yea, prs are actually what makes this stock drop, its weird, but it does...still though, im long and holding
Posts: 664 | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
The Q website is totally out of date. I'm cluless what the programming is today.
Posts: 4245 | From: SMALLVILLE USA | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
Im going to sell some of my shares and hold just 10m until this thing rises. I have too much rapped up in this.
Posts: 276 | Registered: Feb 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Niether, but if I had to choose then, I have to say that I am more of an instigator; Therefore, maybe a Pumpingator or Bashingator. But certainly not a Pumper or Basher.... Boring day at the office. But, I think I have made my point.
quote:Originally posted by Penny-Trader: so what are you then Dew it?
basically if you post then your either a pumper or a basher.
lol
you got the ropes covered.
no one is allowed to say anything good or bad or post anynegative or positive news.
i have a question. what is someone that posts both the positive and the negative news? is he a pasher or a bumper?
Rod
quote:Originally posted by Dew-it: Pumpers and Bashers suck!
Pumpers want you to buy and/or not sell a stock Bashers want you to sell and/or not buy a stock.
So which is the worst of the two? Well both have an agenda - theirs and not yours. IMO, it is very easy to spot a pumper or basher because they:
•claim to know more than anyone else on what is going on with a company, •claim to have a personal relation with all the right people within a company, •claim to know they have "inside info" which then can't share with anyone, •attack anyone that does not see things through personal attacks and obscenities •Immediately try to contact board administrators to ban someone they dislike, •always want to the be first to post negative or positive info and want to take credit for it, •are the first to say I predicted that or I knew about or I told you so, blah, blah •will post a link to a previous post to prove that they mentioned or stated something before •will go back and find someone else’s post to prove a person wrong about something •post non-stop all day, night, morning and weekend, holidays, etc, •will start PM’ing and collaborating with others in order to gang up on someone
In general however, I believe that pumpers are the slimiest and the worst of the two…
Im going to sell some of my shares and hold just 10m until this thing rises. I have too much rapped up in this.
K2 Thanks ... I thought you might have had a reason to expect something within that time period.
I've considered freeing up dead money too, although I still have a "gambler's hope" for a miracle card to hit the board ... and with the recent staff changes, I'm concerned about getting out at the wrong time.
Please, everyone, don't read this as a "pump". I don't think we will see any significant improvement in Q's PPS until Mr. Fan corrects all the problems ... if he corrects all the problems. I'm holding for my own personal reasons. Everyone has to do what they feel is right for them.
GL to us all ... although I hope luck is not our only chance for success.
-------------------- Everything I say is only my opinion ... right or wrong. Posts: 2152 | From: Ohio | Registered: Sep 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Date: Tue, 14 Mar 2006 10:10:03 -0600 From: "Kevin Boyer GGVII" <kevin.boyer*gaygameschicago.org> Add to Address Book Add Mobile Alert To: "mike XXXXX" <XXXXXXX*yahoo.com> Subject: Re: Fwd: QTN
Mike;
We are aware of many changes at Q Television. We continue to discuss with them the mutual goal of televising the Gay Games. We are also looking at other options.
Kevin
Posts: 1236 | From: The Bluegrass State | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Hey, everyone. Quiet day, so while we wait for new facts we can digest, how about some speculation on the daily trading volume.
So I am asking these questions ... again:
1) Who is selling ... and why (especially the huge blocks)? 2) Who is buying ... and why?
Although I am open to any serious opinions, I think a "fact of life" should be considered: No one buys shares in a company unless they expect to make money on the shares.
So, again, who is buying ... and why?
-------------------- Everything I say is only my opinion ... right or wrong. Posts: 2152 | From: Ohio | Registered: Sep 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
It hit .0001 at 40 billion. Now with 350 billion shares if they can get someone to buy this stock. they are selling it at 7 times the value. Current value is .000017. So if share holders sell now they are way ahead.
Posts: 203 | From: Renton, WA | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
Do you recall last year, when Frankie the Fraudster "communicated" to us that someone offered to purchase QTN for low hundered $millions or so (if this were true)? Maybe it was Lloyd? Specualtion here... but if Lloyd was rejected and kept buying up shares while Frankie is diluting and selling shares to finance QTN...meanwhile Lloyd keeps buying, then naturaully Frankie has to keep increasing A/S in attempt to maintain his 53% and still have money to run QTN. Is this how Lloyd managed to take over? It is fishy that he is appointed as interm president that he takes over completely. Is Frankie the Fraudster still selling his shares while Lloyd purchases them? None of us know how much Lloyd and his investors are worth, but I am sure that he or whomever offered the $100 mills last summer would have no problem with $35M (based on QBID 350M A/S) to take over????
Posts: 1124 | From: DC/VA | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by kilhs: It hit .0001 at 40 billion. Now with 350 billion shares if they can get someone to buy this stock. they are selling it at 7 times the value. Current value is .000017. So if share holders sell now they are way ahead.
kilhs Okay ... now who is buying?
By the way ... how are you, shlik? Haven't talked with you lately.
-------------------- Everything I say is only my opinion ... right or wrong. Posts: 2152 | From: Ohio | Registered: Sep 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Dew-it: Bottom, Do you recall last year, when Frankie the Fraudster "communicated" to us that someone offered to purchase QTN for low hundered $millions or so (if this were true)? Maybe it was Lloyd? Specualtion here... but if Lloyd was rejected and kept buying up shares while Frankie is diluting and selling shares to finance QTN...meanwhile Lloyd keeps buying, then naturaully Frankie has to keep increasing A/S in attempt to maintain his 53% and still have money to run QTN. Is this how Lloyd managed to take over? It is fishy that he is appointed as interm president that he takes over completely. Is Frankie the Fraudster still selling his shares while Lloyd purchases them? None of us know how much Lloyd and his investors are worth, but I am sure that he or whomever offered the $100 mills last summer would have no problem with $35M (based on QBID 350M A/S) to take over????
Dew You've asked many good questions. And your speculaton would explain both sides of the equation ... who's buying and who's selling.
Thanks.
-------------------- Everything I say is only my opinion ... right or wrong. Posts: 2152 | From: Ohio | Registered: Sep 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Noobs that want to see a million shares in their account I guess, or qbidiots? I'm doing good thanks, took a long lunch, so I jumped on the computer. How are you.
Posts: 203 | From: Renton, WA | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I just got two five star ratings. Thanks guys it felt good. when my stars reach 4 then start buying Q again.
Posts: 203 | From: Renton, WA | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I would like to add that just because Frank said he maintained a 53% share of the stocks does not make it true. perhaps it was another lie to keep us share holders from taking the company from him. And maybe Fan realized this and took the company from Frank.
I would think that a man in Fan's position could be privy to information that we could not get.
Danny
Posts: 14 | From: Bedford, VA | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by kilhs: Noobs that want to see a million shares in their account I guess, or qbidiots? I'm doing good thanks, took a long lunch, so I jumped on the computer. How are you.
kilhs Thanks for your thoughts.
In my opinion, it's "possible" that there are enough individuals to buy the billions of Q shares that have been sold, but I just don't think it's "probable".
Someone suggested recently that the billions of shares traded each day are mostly MMs moving them back and forth and that only a few millions actually move between individual owners. If that is true, then your speculation makes a lot more sense to me.
I'm not trying to dispute you, but billions of shares traded every day is just mind-boggling to me.
And I'm glad you're doing well. Nothing much has changed with me. Still watching stocks and just as confused as ever.
-------------------- Everything I say is only my opinion ... right or wrong. Posts: 2152 | From: Ohio | Registered: Sep 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by dskalka: I would like to add that just because Frank said he maintained a 53% share of the stocks does not make it true. perhaps it was another lie to keep us share holders from taking the company from him. And maybe Fan realized this and took the company from Frank.
I would think that a man in Fan's position could be privy to information that we could not get.
Danny
precisely why share structure and status of owned entities must be disclosed.
posted
Ya if it was so easy it wouldnt be any fun. The power of positive thinking can only go so far, the new owner has the same foundation, non reporting. Mr. Fan would be able to tell us shareholders what we own, share structure, real numbers, and is there an audit ? Was there an audit? Can we see it?. But now three prs and he has not, so I dont see anything changing.
Posts: 203 | From: Renton, WA | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
IMO it is early in game with Lloyd and I am wiling to give him the benefit of the doubt for the time being because I have nothing to loose at this point. At least he got rid of Frankie the Fraudster and crew. I thing that is a start/change.
quote:Originally posted by kilhs: Ya if it was so easy it wouldnt be any fun. The power of positive thinking can only go so far, the new owner has the same foundation, non reporting. Mr. Fan would be able to tell us shareholders what we own, share structure, real numbers, and is there an audit ? Was there an audit? Can we see it?. But now three prs and he has not, so I dont see anything changing.
posted
This obviously is a critical turning point. Yes KC your right, our knowledge of ownership status regarding Frank's 53% is important for us as well as it is for those new investors, lurking, that may have been up until now reluctant to invest because of Frank’s performance.
The removal process of Frank is “key” and will certainly be used as a measuring tool by new investors big and small to determine if TMM worthy of their investments.
If it is learned after transparency that Frank remains in control, I'm afraid TMM's reputation will be forevermore tainted by his inabilities, betrayals and misuse. Therefore, in my opinion, from a big investors perspective point of view, no matter the efforts of Hinnant's leaps and bounds, TMM could never live up to their expectations.
And that my fiends would leave us with an investment that never comes to its full potential in respect to returns.
But nonetheless, we'll just have to continue to wait. And hopefully we'll soon learn that Frank is no longer in control. Posts: 1236 | From: The Bluegrass State | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
I hope to god he is more worried about keeping the company alive than releasing investor info just yet. I want all of that info, but bankruptcy is the one thing that guarantees we are screwed!
-------------------- I just want to make enough money to be eccentric. Posts: 2412 | From: Atlanta | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
