posted
Whats going on? Only MMs can get .0003 for their shares? I have a sell in since yesterday.
Posts: 4245 | From: SMALLVILLE USA | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Dew-it: Wangdo try the link below on smallcapcenter.com. I use smallcap quite a bit. It give you 20 and 105 day and lots of other info/indicators for stocks.
quote:Originally posted by Wangdo: hey Dew you have a 90 or 100 day trading avg
-------------------- Sometimes the poorest man leaves his children the richest inheritance. Posts: 804 | From: Woodbridge, Va | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Dig, I have been trying to sell a stinky 1.5 million to see if it goes through, this since last week, and not a bite for even a partial fill. MMs feeding off each other, or maybe Frankie Boy making some quick money. They are in bed together you know!! LOL
Posts: 1637 | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
WOW thats really a scary thought, thank you, i wont beable to sleep for a week now with that image...
quote:Originally posted by Bigrod40: Dig, I have been trying to sell a stinky 1.5 million to see if it goes through, this since last week, and not a bite for even a partial fill. MMs feeding off each other, or maybe Frankie Boy making some quick money. They are in bed together you know!! LOL
-------------------- M.M. Semester #3 started,Only 7 more semesters to go. Why, in an age where information is so easy to get, cant we find information on one man. Experience is something you dont get until just after you need it. Posts: 1002 | From: Southaven, Mississippi, US | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Dew-it I agree they will more then likely be stalling as well. however, they have been advised by Washington state lawyers that he has to show them these documents, so as long as he follows the laws, and postpones in a legal manner, then in effect we are winning the fight.
Frank has a reason to be postponing this meeting, im hoping it is in an effort to protect a deal that is eminent.
Frank should not be afraid of a bad audit, as good or bad if he where to be reporting, this stock would be more encouraged to trade at its true valuation.
Lets just look at the situation for moment.
worse case scenario lets say the film library is only worth 200 million. the company is worth 100 million.
company is worth 300 million total
lets assume the worst. 100 billion shares out
that still gives us a value of .003
that is 10 times more then we are valued at right now.
OK now lets make this look worse.
lets say the entire company is worth 100 million.
that is still .001.
that is still 3-5 times higher then we are trading at right now.
So why would Frank be hiding this info. does anyone honestly believe that this company is worth less then the 20-30 million that this price represents that we are trading at right now.
anything that audit states over 30 million total value is a bonus and good news to anyone investing and holding at these prices.
That is why i believe that Frank is protecting a big deal. some thing big is about to happen and im placing 7 million share bet on that right now.
Doc and Monkey may not get all the info that they would like to get tomorrow, they may not get all the info you and i would like to see. they may not get any info tomorrow, but rest assured the pressure is on. the info is not far away, they can only postpone so long before they are into major problems.
I will respect Docs decisions on when and how to proceed from tomorrows meeting.
I feel good that by the end of this month, we are going to have a much brighter outlook as to what this company is doing and has in store for us.
I want to congratulate all the longs that have held strong to this point. I still feel that that stance will be rewarded.
Rod
-------------------- Dont buy or sell on my opinions, do your research. Make sure you know what you are buying before you buy.
This is a non reporting pink sheet with very high risk. From high risk comes high rewards. Dont invest more then you can afford to lose. Posts: 4801 | From: Prescott, ON, Canada | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Ya if your not a shareholder, your good in bed or anywhere else, so it seems.
quote:Originally posted by Bigrod40: Dig, I have been trying to sell a stinky 1.5 million to see if it goes through, this since last week, and not a bite for even a partial fill. MMs feeding off each other, or maybe Frankie Boy making some quick money. They are in bed together you know!! LOL
Posts: 4245 | From: SMALLVILLE USA | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Most if not all the buying and selling actitivity is happening at .0002. The MM keep shifting the BID accordingly between .0001/.0002 A few small buys are going through at .0003
quote:Originally posted by DIGDOUGH: Whats going on? Only MMs can get .0003 for their shares? I have a sell in since yesterday.
posted
You are asking some obvious questions.. the answers are not so obvious which is why there is so much speculation as to what is wrong with this stock. It appears to be things we don't know about that are affecting how things are, and why they aren't.... and nobody is speaking up... not yet anyway...
quote:Originally posted by Penny-Trader: Dew-it I agree they will more then likely be stalling as well. however, they have been advised by Washington state lawyers that he has to show them these documents, so as long as he follows the laws, and postpones in a legal manner, then in effect we are winning the fight.
Frank has a reason to be postponing this meeting, im hoping it is in an effort to protect a deal that is eminent.
Frank should not be afraid of a bad audit, as good or bad if he where to be reporting, this stock would be more encouraged to trade at its true valuation.
Lets just look at the situation for moment.
worse case scenario lets say the film library is only worth 200 million. the company is worth 100 million.
company is worth 300 million total
lets assume the worst. 100 billion shares out
that still gives us a value of .003
that is 10 times more then we are valued at right now.
OK now lets make this look worse.
lets say the entire company is worth 100 million.
that is still .001.
that is still 3-5 times higher then we are trading at right now.
So why would Frank be hiding this info. does anyone honestly believe that this company is worth less then the 20-30 million that this price represents that we are trading at right now.
anything that audit states over 30 million total value is a bonus and good news to anyone investing and holding at these prices.
That is why i believe that Frank is protecting a big deal. some thing big is about to happen and im placing 7 million share bet on that right now.
Doc and Monkey may not get all the info that they would like to get tomorrow, they may not get all the info you and i would like to see. they may not get any info tomorrow, but rest assured the pressure is on. the info is not far away, they can only postpone so long before they are into major problems.
I will respect Docs decisions on when and how to proceed from tomorrows meeting.
I feel good that by the end of this month, we are going to have a much brighter outlook as to what this company is doing and has in store for us.
I want to congratulate all the longs that have held strong to this point. I still feel that that stance will be rewarded.
Rod
Posts: 313 | From: Myrtle Beach, SC USA | Registered: Sep 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
this is exactly why i continue to hold my core and looking to add some more
quote:Originally posted by Penny-Trader: Dew-it I agree they will more then likely be stalling as well. however, they have been advised by Washington state lawyers that he has to show them these documents, so as long as he follows the laws, and postpones in a legal manner, then in effect we are winning the fight.
Frank has a reason to be postponing this meeting, im hoping it is in an effort to protect a deal that is eminent.
Frank should not be afraid of a bad audit, as good or bad if he where to be reporting, this stock would be more encouraged to trade at its true valuation.
Lets just look at the situation for moment.
worse case scenario lets say the film library is only worth 200 million. the company is worth 100 million.
company is worth 300 million total
lets assume the worst. 100 billion shares out
that still gives us a value of .003
that is 10 times more then we are valued at right now.
OK now lets make this look worse.
lets say the entire company is worth 100 million.
that is still .001.
that is still 3-5 times higher then we are trading at right now.
So why would Frank be hiding this info. does anyone honestly believe that this company is worth less then the 20-30 million that this price represents that we are trading at right now.
anything that audit states over 30 million total value is a bonus and good news to anyone investing and holding at these prices.
That is why i believe that Frank is protecting a big deal. some thing big is about to happen and im placing 7 million share bet on that right now.
Doc and Monkey may not get all the info that they would like to get tomorrow, they may not get all the info you and i would like to see. they may not get any info tomorrow, but rest assured the pressure is on. the info is not far away, they can only postpone so long before they are into major problems.
I will respect Docs decisions on when and how to proceed from tomorrows meeting.
I feel good that by the end of this month, we are going to have a much brighter outlook as to what this company is doing and has in store for us.
I want to congratulate all the longs that have held strong to this point. I still feel that that stance will be rewarded.
Rod
-------------------- Sometimes the poorest man leaves his children the richest inheritance. Posts: 804 | From: Woodbridge, Va | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
PT, I hope your right. Sounds good on paper. Frank can't sell on bogus values at this time. So the jig is up and he might as well get realistic and honest about the whole thing. I don't know that he has to reveal deals that are in the works or not. Frank is the general and Q is still in the infantry, we'll have to fight our way to the next level. Posts: 4245 | From: SMALLVILLE USA | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Good question, it would be interesting to see how many people would want out at break even, rather than stick it out. I would probably keep some shares, .0000053%.
quote:Originally posted by Gordon Bennett: Who else here would be overjoyed just to break even?
Posts: 4245 | From: SMALLVILLE USA | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
i would be happy to see green. but even is not near good enough for me.
I dont believe that is the best i will do. If all i do is break even then i will have considered this a falure as a company.
i believe that i am going to make bank on this stock, as i refuse to sell a single share for less then a proffit.
im rich or the stock goes bust in my mind. no inbetween for me.
Rod
-------------------- Dont buy or sell on my opinions, do your research. Make sure you know what you are buying before you buy.
This is a non reporting pink sheet with very high risk. From high risk comes high rewards. Dont invest more then you can afford to lose. Posts: 4801 | From: Prescott, ON, Canada | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by moneypenny: OK MJM2005, gotcha! Kept thinking .01 since everyone says that's about where we should be, but that's now, before any split.
Yeah, but most likely...if we don't get any financials or other legit reasons to bring the price up, then it would probably cause the price to go down after a reverse split...
-------------------- Remember two things: You love New York City and leave only your footprints. Posts: 1526 | From: Chatham, NJ... and NC-- Wake Forest University | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Penny-Trader: ... Lets just look at the situation for moment ... Rod
Rod Well done. You've made some excellent points to support your positive point of view. I realize that everything you've said is opinion, but it's just as likely to be true as any of the other speculations presented to us recently.
Which brings me to my main point: None of us knows where we stand as shareholders. None of us knows what Frank is doing, thinking or planning. None of us knows enough at this point to do anything but state opinions. Although I welcome all opinions, I cannot take any opinion seriously without seeing a reason for that opinion. So, everyone, please do us all a favor and explain why you think as you do. If you think Q is a good investment, explain why ... if you think Q is not a good investment, explain why.
And once again, Rod, you've done a great job expressing a positive side of the QBID saga with solid reasons why you think as you do. Since I also believe that Q is still a good investment, I agree with your comments. And if I'm wrong, so be it. But I prefer to see the "glass half full" until I see facts that prove me wrong.
-------------------- Everything I say is only my opinion ... right or wrong. Posts: 2152 | From: Ohio | Registered: Sep 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
B/L, well spoken. Our investment is down, but the fact of the matter is we still don't have enough evidence to cuff him....Innocent till proven guilty. I might be exagerating here, with the innocent part.
Posts: 4245 | From: SMALLVILLE USA | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Gordon Bennett: Who else here would be overjoyed just to break even?
GB I would be overjoyed to "be even" right now, since that would mean that Q's PPS was significantly higher than it is today ... and would mean that Q was moving in the right direction for me to continue to hold my shares for the "right sale price".
So, to answer your question, I do not intend to sell at my break-even point unless I see no possibility of higher prices. This might be greed talking, but it's my current opinion.
-------------------- Everything I say is only my opinion ... right or wrong. Posts: 2152 | From: Ohio | Registered: Sep 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
PT... I am with you. QBID will either make me a lots of money in a few years, or I'll lose about $11k if its become completely worthless. I will need a long term capital gain lost against my ELN profits anyway.
For you old people like me.. I remember:
back in the 70's when I first saw a Japanese car. It was so small I said myself..'who would ever want to drive a car that small?
I remember when they started selling bottle water. I said to my self 'who would ever buy bottle water?"
I remember when cable TV first came out, I said to myself..'who would ever pay for TV?'
Now, when I tell my friends that I own QBID, a gay TV network.. well you can imagine the remarks and looks that I get from them (down here in the south)
I believe QBID will make. It may not be the stock blockbuster we all dreaming about, but it will make it as long as it can sustain a subscription base.
Posts: 265 | From: Jacksonville, fl | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by DIGDOUGH: B/L, well spoken. Our investment is down, but the fact of the matter is we still don't have enough evidence to cuff him....Innocent till proven guilty. I might be exagerating here, with the innocent part.
Just remember. The stock price really doesn't matter (except to us shareholders) as far as the survivability of QBID. It is the Balance Sheet. As long as QBID doesn't have any major liabilities that would cause any creditor to come after it for payments. QBID can last forever, be it at .0002 or .00000000000000002
Posts: 265 | From: Jacksonville, fl | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by manfromjax: Just remember. The stock price really doesn't matter (except to us shareholders) as far as the survivability of QBID. It is the Balance Sheet. As long as QBID doesn't have any major liabilities that would cause any creditor to come after it for payments. QBID can last forever, be it at .0002 or .00000000000000002
mfj Very true. The PPS is not what determines a company's value ... it's only what investors are willing to pay for a share ... and we've proven that share-buyers are not always right.
-------------------- Everything I say is only my opinion ... right or wrong. Posts: 2152 | From: Ohio | Registered: Sep 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Dew-it: [QB] Another "Fluffy" PR from Frankie boy.
Sandra Bernhard Signs Deal With Q Television Network to Co-Host 'Queer Edge With Jack E. Jett' Jan 11, 2006 10:07:00 AM BURBANK, Calif., Jan. 11 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- ----------------
Dew, I disagree. Since this is a subscription-based revenue model, content is King.
Kmetko and Bernhard are big pickups.
Posts: 333 | From: Washington, DC | Registered: Nov 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Gordon Bennett: Who else here would be overjoyed just to break even?
I would rather take the tax loss than break even at this point. I am in this for the long haul. I have already written off the money in my head as gambling loss so at this point it means nothing to me anyway. Either I end up financial set to take a few years off or I stay just where I am today.
Posts: 482 | From: Arizona | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Penny-Trader: [QB] i think i understand where your thinking from but let me expand a bit on that.
there was nothing released yesterday that would give him any more legal right to postpone Doc and Monkey. They have a legal obligation to share that infor with them and spending that kind of money on prs yesterday is not going to give them any type of a legal stall tactic.
if they dont show Doc and Monkey the information that they are suppose to show, then the SEC will be recieveing a registered letter pointing out the failure to comply.
If this happens Frank has bigger problems on his hand.
I believe just by the sheer volume of news we recieved yesterday, that the pressure is being felt by Frank and crew, and they had to get this info out. This info had been ready to go for some time. these prs where not thrown together last minute, as they are all very well written and where not rushed in their preperation.
This is encouraging to me as it does not appear that these where last minute rush jobs to get news out to head off a problem.
Rod
Well written? The mistaken use of 'SAAG' instead of 'GAAP' (twice!) and the grammatical errors? What company's PRs are you talking about here?
Posts: 38 | From: Lumberg, OH | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Dew-it: Another "Fluffy" PR from Frankie boy.
Sandra Bernhard Signs Deal With Q Television Network to Co-Host 'Queer Edge With Jack E. Jett'
Dew-it I have to disagree ... any positive news from Q is good news and certainly not "fluff".
It's not the PR we are waiting for, but it's like caramel topping on one of Jennifer's cheesecakes ... it may not be needed but it does make the cake more tasty (no offense, Jenn, because I know your cheesecakes are perfect just the way they are ).
Anyway, if you prefer to see the "glass half empty", so be it. I prefer to see the "glass half full". Although neither point of view will change a thing or make us any money, I bet I smile a lot more than you do ...
-------------------- Everything I say is only my opinion ... right or wrong. Posts: 2152 | From: Ohio | Registered: Sep 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Ad astra: [QUOTE]Originally posted by Dew-it: [QB] Another "Fluffy" PR from Frankie boy.
Sandra Bernhard Signs Deal With Q Television Network to Co-Host 'Queer Edge With Jack E. Jett' Jan 11, 2006 10:07:00 AM BURBANK, Calif., Jan. 11 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- ----------------
Dew, I disagree. Since this is a subscription-based revenue model, content is King.
Kmetko and Bernhard are big pickups.
A-a I agree with you ... Sandra is a big draw, and Q's success is all about customers and revenue.
-------------------- Everything I say is only my opinion ... right or wrong. Posts: 2152 | From: Ohio | Registered: Sep 2004
| IP: Logged |
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
I could sell some shares, buy a new car for cash and still get rich on Q stock.![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
