quote:Originally posted by manfromjax: My Ameritrade works..
Gee, I am tempted to buy a few hundred shares near the close at .0004 just so it will look good. It would only cost a couple of bucks.
jax Good theory but the process doesn't work that way. A bid of .0004 (or $1.00 for that matter) would go through at the lowest asking price, which appears to be .0003 right now.
However, I believe the MMs can make odd price trades and often do to "paint the tape" and make it appear that extremely high or low trades are taking place. But I'm no expert on this so don't quote me ...
That is the way it is SUPPOSE to work.....Pinks???
Yes, that is how it is suppose to work. I know from past experience that when I have 'accidently' put in a higher Bid price then the current Ask price, I got the shares at the current Ask. At least Ameritrade does this for me. So, if I was to accidently bid .002 verses .0002, I would make the buy at .0002, unless the pps was going up, then I could possible pay more. But there have been time when we see the pps spike up way above the Ask on the chart..so I wonder sometimes.
Posts: 265 | From: Jacksonville, fl | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Wont it be nice when the day comes we can go here QBID and see something?
Posts: 265 | From: Jacksonville, fl | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
As I said before, I don't like pushing a stock.. but in this case I will. Please look at ELN . I have been in it for over 3 years and have ridden it up and down. It has been one hell of a roller coaster ride. The ride is going to be straight up for the next few months. They have a great drug for MS that was pulled temporarily (because of Vioxx scare and other things) but is coming back soon (March). And they have a great Nano drug delievery system that is getting better.
I know that we QBID investors have been through some tuff times owning QBID, but I have been through a tuffer time owning ELN..believe me. So, I am telling you of a great chance to make a GOOD return on your money.
But as always, this is just my opinion, do you own DD. I am just throwing this out there for a chance to make some money while we wait for QBID to go somewhere. Of course I have bought as low as $1.35 a few years ago. But it is like QBID...you got to believe in it!
Posts: 265 | From: Jacksonville, fl | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
George "The Gipper" Gipp (February 18, 1895 – December 14, 1920) was a famous college football player who played for the University of Notre Dame.
Gipp died 14 December, 1920, two weeks before being elected Notre Dame's first All-American by Walter Camp. The apocryphal story of Gipp's death begins when he returned from a night out to Notre Dame's campus after curfew. Unable to gain entrance to his residence, Gipp went to the rear door of Washington Hall, the campus' theatre building. Gipp was a steward for the building, and knew that the rear door was often unlocked. Gipp usually spent such nights in the hall. On that night, however, the door was locked, and Gipp was forced to sleep outside. By the morning he had contracted pneumonia, and eventually died from a related infection.
It was on his hospital bed that he delivered the famous, but possibly fictional, "win just one for the Gipper" line. The full quotation from which the line is derived is:
I've got to go, Rock (Knute Rockne). It's all right. I'm not afraid. Some time, Rock, when the team is up against it, when things are wrong and the breaks are beating the boys, tell them to go in there with all they've got and win just one for the Gipper. I don't know where I'll be then, Rock. But I'll know about it, and I'll be happy.
-------------------- Just the facts, ma'am. Posts: 1083 | From: New Jersey | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged |
Wednesday, 11 January 2006 Q Television Becomes a Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Triangle Multi-Media LOS ANGELES, CA, (NAMC) – On Tuesday the 24/7 premium television network geared towards the gay community, Q Television (PINK SHEETS: QBID) , made an announcement that the company will be accounted for as a wholly owned subsidiary of Triangle Mutli-Media.
According to the release Triangle Multi-Media will own 100% of Q Televisions asset base, even though the company operated as an independent entity since it’s inception.
Triangle Multi-Media and Q Television Network CEO Frank Olsen said "Up to thirty percent of QTN may be used for future financing and debt. With the accelerated growth of QTN, management felt it was time to formally announce this to QBID shareholders.”
This is why investing in a reporting company is essential for investors, when a company is not required to report investors are in the dark until they are allowed to see light.
In this case investors in Q Television lose their value but when a stock is trading at .0002 what should they expect.
Usually we would not report on stocks that trade on the Pink Sheets, but this just caught my attention.
posted
I am confused about a fear of a reverse split. If the value of the company can be confirmed by an independent audit...then what does it matter if there are 1 million shares or 100 billion?
If you want to buy a pack of Bubblegum and you have 100 pennies in your left pant pocket or a single dollar in your right pant pocket, either could be used to purchase the pack of Bubblegum, correct? Both have the same value.
And I have seen a number of companies successfully pull off the Reverse Split (JDSU recently).
I also like that TMM is getting The Q under GAAP accounting principles...it sounds like there may be an effort underway to make this a reporting company.
And if were a true effort to get to an exchange (NASD or AMEX), I'd gladly take a 5,000/1 reverse split to do it.
Posts: 333 | From: Washington, DC | Registered: Nov 2005
| IP: Logged |
-------------------- NO REWARD....UNLESS THE RISK IS TAKIN'--- JAY-Z Posts: 409 | From: THE CITY THE CONTROLS THE WORLD.............THATZ RIGHT NEW YORK | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Ad astra: I am confused about a fear of a reverse split. If the value of the company can be confirmed by an independent audit...then what does it matter if there are 1 million shares or 100 billion?
If you want to buy a pack of Bubblegum and you have 100 pennies in your left pant pocket or a single dollar in your right pant pocket, either could be used to purchase the pack of Bubblegum, correct? Both have the same value.
And I have seen a number of companies successfully pull off the Reverse Split (JDSU recently).
I also like that TMM is getting The Q under GAAP accounting principles...it sounds like there may be an effort underway to make this a reporting company.
And if were a true effort to get to an exchange (NASD or AMEX), I'd gladly take a 5,000/1 reverse split to do it.
A 5000/1 split with a price of .01 would make my million shares of Q worth a whopping $2 .
Posts: 72 | From: fla | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
At the time of the split, yes, the value and percent you own remain unchanged. Where the real problem comes in is if the authorized shares are not reversed at the same time (and this is not automatic). If there are 100B authorized and 100B outstanding and there is a 1 for 100 reverse split then there are now 1B outstanding and still 100B authorized. The company has just gone from not being able to sell more stock to now being able to sell 99B more shares. And guess what that does to your percent ownership.
quote:Originally posted by Ad astra: I am confused about a fear of a reverse split. If the value of the company can be confirmed by an independent audit...then what does it matter if there are 1 million shares or 100 billion?
If you want to buy a pack of Bubblegum and you have 100 pennies in your left pant pocket or a single dollar in your right pant pocket, either could be used to purchase the pack of Bubblegum, correct? Both have the same value.
And I have seen a number of companies successfully pull off the Reverse Split (JDSU recently).
I also like that TMM is getting The Q under GAAP accounting principles...it sounds like there may be an effort underway to make this a reporting company.
And if were a true effort to get to an exchange (NASD or AMEX), I'd gladly take a 5,000/1 reverse split to do it.
-------------------- The opinions expressed here by myself and others should be taken for what they are: opinions. Beware, many express opinion as fact. Do your own research from reputable sources and never invest more than you can afford to loose. ~,-,-< GatorMan Posts: 752 | From: Springville, Utah | Registered: Jan 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
looks like the blocks of 9,9,7 will be prevalent today.
so far 12 blocks
-------------------- Sometimes the poorest man leaves his children the richest inheritance. Posts: 804 | From: Woodbridge, Va | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
IMHO I think QBID will have a RS, no mattert what FO has promised before. A stock like QBID that wants to be looked at as a good investment in the market can't have a 100 billion shares OS. Is a RS good? I have owned a few companies over the years that have done a RS (MSS, TWW, TFSM, ADSX, IWOV.) All of these companies are still surviving. Now true, on most the pps does go down afterwards. However, if QBID has a good subscription base (revenue) and low liabilities, in the long run it will survive. A 100B shares OS is ridiculous.
Posts: 265 | From: Jacksonville, fl | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Exactly, Gatorman. An RS would allow for further dilution and loss of investment $$. Frank finds the QBID investor a necessary nuisance instead of valuing them as a partner in developing his dream. He is not investor-friendly and unless forced by legal means, I suspect he won't willingly act in our best interest.
-------------------- Just the facts, ma'am. Posts: 1083 | From: New Jersey | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Bigrod40: INTERESTING INDEED
Wednesday, 11 January 2006 Q Television Becomes a Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Triangle Multi-Media LOS ANGELES, CA, (NAMC) – On Tuesday the 24/7 premium television network geared towards the gay community, Q Television (PINK SHEETS: QBID) , made an announcement that the company will be accounted for as a wholly owned subsidiary of Triangle Mutli-Media.
According to the release Triangle Multi-Media will own 100% of Q Televisions asset base, even though the company operated as an independent entity since it’s inception.
Triangle Multi-Media and Q Television Network CEO Frank Olsen said "Up to thirty percent of QTN may be used for future financing and debt. With the accelerated growth of QTN, management felt it was time to formally announce this to QBID shareholders.”
This is why investing in a reporting company is essential for investors, when a company is not required to report investors are in the dark until they are allowed to see light.
In this case investors in Q Television lose their value but when a stock is trading at .0002 what should they expect.
Usually we would not report on stocks that trade on the Pink Sheets, but this just caught my attention.
David Kingston Los Angeles News Correspondent NAMC Newswire www.namcnewswire.com
This guy is a tool. There ARE no QTN investors, QBID is TMM.
Posts: 369 | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Ad astra: I am confused about a fear of a reverse split. If the value of the company can be confirmed by an independent audit...then what does it matter if there are 1 million shares or 100 billion?
If you want to buy a pack of Bubblegum and you have 100 pennies in your left pant pocket or a single dollar in your right pant pocket, either could be used to purchase the pack of Bubblegum, correct? Both have the same value.
And I have seen a number of companies successfully pull off the Reverse Split (JDSU recently).
I also like that TMM is getting The Q under GAAP accounting principles...it sounds like there may be an effort underway to make this a reporting company.
And if were a true effort to get to an exchange (NASD or AMEX), I'd gladly take a 5,000/1 reverse split to do it.
A 5000/1 split with a price of .01 would make my million shares of Q worth a whopping $2 .
WRONG! It'd be worth $200 at the time of the split...
1000000/5000= 200
5000x0.0002= $1/share
200x$1=$200
Now, if it goes down to $.01...then, you'd be correct.
-------------------- Remember two things: You love New York City and leave only your footprints. Posts: 1526 | From: Chatham, NJ... and NC-- Wake Forest University | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Well, I guess, in time, we will see how truthful Frank is. He has stated no reverse split while he is CEO. He hasn't became a bonified liar as of date, just hasn't told us the whole truth. I sure hope he keeps his promise this time.
Posts: 455 | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
OK MJM2005, gotcha! Kept thinking .01 since everyone says that's about where we should be, but that's now, before any split.
Posts: 72 | From: fla | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
Sandra Bernhard Signs Deal With Q Television Network to Co-Host 'Queer Edge With Jack E. Jett' Jan 11, 2006 10:07:00 AM BURBANK, Calif., Jan. 11 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Q Television Network (QTN) (OTC: QBID) announced today that Sandra Bernhard has inked a deal to co-host forty (40) episodes of "Queer Edge with Jack E. Jett" beginning January 16th. In addition, Bernhard is also in negotiations to develop her very own series for the network. "Queer Edge with Jack E. Jett" airs nightly at 10 pm EST / 7 pm PST.
"Sandra Bernhard is a fearless performer and iconic voice in our community," stated Alexis Fish, Senior Executive Vice President. "It is a tremendous honor and right of passage for us at QTN to showcase this caliber of artist and activist."
For 25 years, Sandra Bernhard has been challenging fans and critics with her knife-edged humor, satire and emotive performances on film, television and stage. Her critically acclaimed 1998, one-woman Broadway hit, "I'm Still Here...Damn It!" which played the Booth Theater, had critics raving. Since her first film accolades in 1983 in Martin Scorseses', "The King of Comedy" featuring Jerry Lewis and Robert De Niro, Bernhard has since appeared in numerous films including "Inside Monkey Zetterland," "Hudson Hawk" and more recently, "Dinner Rush." Throughout her career, Bernhard's formidable presence has also had a place on television. From 1991-1996, she portrayed Nancy on "Roseanne," and has had guest starring roles on "Ally McBeal," "Chicago Hope" and "Will & Grace." She hosted the season premiere of "MadTV" and the Bravo network recently profiled her career. In 2001, Bernhard hosted her own talk show, "The Sandra Bernhard Experience" for A&E television.
The irreverent and subversive Jack E. Jett, a self-described, "Homosupremacist" says "Sandra and I won't be trying to find an audience, we'll be looking for accomplices!"
A nightly talk show like nothing you've ever seen, "Queer Edge with Jack E. Jett" takes comedy to a whole new level. Host Jett focuses on pop culture and subculture with a cutting edge that is dynamic, witty and downright zany. The show covers everything from arts and news to celebrities and Internet subcultures -- all from a refreshing GLBT perspective. "Queer Edge" gives viewers a truly out-of-this-world experience as they are launched into the outlandish conversations between Jett and his hosts. Jack E. Jett's "Queer Edge" encompasses all that is queer in the world of counter-culture; in an effort to show that the word "queer" is more that just a term for gays.
About Q Television
This 24/7 premium television network is organized to create, develop and feature television programming for the gay and lesbian community, including live & interactive content every weeknight, plus sports, information and entertainment. While the company expects much of its subscriber base to be comprised of members of the gay and lesbian population, management also believes that quality programming about the gay and lesbian experience, designed to entertain, educate and inform, will attract many other segments of the viewing public.
The company's programming is available on a subscription basis to those desiring to subscribe. The monthly fee varies by region of the country. The network is telecast 24 hours per day, 7 days per week and features a variety of live and original programming. Q Television is available on such blue chip cable systems as Time Warner, Cox Communications and RCN, among others, with availability approaching 3 million digital cable households in the U.S. Q Television Network is the official network of Gay Games(r) VII. The network is also ad-supported. For further information on programming and subscriptions, please visit www.qtelevision.com.
MEDIA CONTACT: Jim Strzalkowski T: 818-338-3555 Email: jim*prioritypr.net
INVESTOR RELATIONS: Richard Brown T: 617-314-7379 Email: Staff*EquityRelations.com SOURCE Q Television Network
Posts: 1124 | From: DC/VA | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Doctoall: HELP WANTED: Okay so you all know that we are planning on having a meeting in Burbank with "Q" on Thursday Jauary 12th 2006.
However, to date that have not given us a specific time for the meeting. We are asking that throughout today and tomorrow, you give a call to "Q" in Burbank and Palm Springs and remind them about the meeting on Thursday.
In order words please help us to keep the pressure on them. Please call the following numbers and if you cannot get through to Frank, Rene or Randy, then leave messages telling them that you expect the meeting to take place and you want to know the time.
The numbers are: Burbank: 1-818-848-5800 Palm Springs 1-760-323-4455.
It may not help but the effort would be appreciated, let them know that today is the day we want answers.
I'll be calling them today, and the message I'll leave is 'what time will Olsen be meeting with the shareholders on the 12th?'
Posts: 38 | From: Lumberg, OH | Registered: Jan 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
IMO the reason we got the "bone" yesterday was so that Frankie boy can continue can buy himself some more time and continue to stall the audit results; and to further postpone the meeting with Doc and Imak.
Posts: 1124 | From: DC/VA | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
hey Dew you have a 90 or 100 day trading avg
-------------------- Sometimes the poorest man leaves his children the richest inheritance. Posts: 804 | From: Woodbridge, Va | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Bobbyd: Doc, Imak, Is the meeting with Frank still on for Thursday?
Hey Bobby give them a call....
as of yesterday nothing on the books.
[/QUOTE]Originally posted by Doctoall: HELP WANTED: Okay so you all know that we are planning on having a meeting in Burbank with "Q" on Thursday Jauary 12th 2006.
However, to date that have not given us a specific time for the meeting. We are asking that throughout today and tomorrow, you give a call to "Q" in Burbank and Palm Springs and remind them about the meeting on Thursday.
In order words please help us to keep the pressure on them. Please call the following numbers and if you cannot get through to Frank, Rene or Randy, then leave messages telling them that you expect the meeting to take place and you want to know the time.
The numbers are: Burbank: 1-818-848-5800 Palm Springs 1-760-323-4455.
It may not help but the effort would be appreciated, let them know that today is the day we want answers. [/QUOTE]
-------------------- Sometimes the poorest man leaves his children the richest inheritance. Posts: 804 | From: Woodbridge, Va | Registered: Aug 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by DIGDOUGH: I'm not Doc ,but I was told by Doc that the meeting is to go down on thurs. Frank wants doc to get down there tonight, Doc's suspicion is that it will be an early meeting.?????????
Isn't that good?
Posts: 369 | Registered: Dec 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
i think i understand where your thinking from but let me expand a bit on that.
there was nothing released yesterday that would give him any more legal right to postpone Doc and Monkey. They have a legal obligation to share that infor with them and spending that kind of money on prs yesterday is not going to give them any type of a legal stall tactic.
if they dont show Doc and Monkey the information that they are suppose to show, then the SEC will be recieveing a registered letter pointing out the failure to comply.
If this happens Frank has bigger problems on his hand.
I believe just by the sheer volume of news we recieved yesterday, that the pressure is being felt by Frank and crew, and they had to get this info out. This info had been ready to go for some time. these prs where not thrown together last minute, as they are all very well written and where not rushed in their preperation.
This is encouraging to me as it does not appear that these where last minute rush jobs to get news out to head off a problem.
Rod
quote:Originally posted by Dew-it: IMO the reason we got the "bone" yesterday was so that Frankie boy can continue can buy himself some more time and continue to stall the audit results; and to further postpone the meeting with Doc and Imak.
-------------------- Dont buy or sell on my opinions, do your research. Make sure you know what you are buying before you buy.
This is a non reporting pink sheet with very high risk. From high risk comes high rewards. Dont invest more then you can afford to lose. Posts: 4801 | From: Prescott, ON, Canada | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by DIGDOUGH: I'm not Doc ,but I was told by Doc that the meeting is to go down on thurs. Frank wants doc to get down there tonight, Doc's suspicion is that it will be an early meeting.?????????
posted
PT, I agree. I also believe that the pressure from Doc and Imak is what drove Frankie boy to release that kind of info yesterday. IMO though, I believe Frankie will attempt to continue to stall the release of info. He may not flat out say NO, but he can continue to stall and postpone, which is NOT illegal.I think he is trying to buy more time (for whatever reason). This of course is speculation on my part.
quote:Originally posted by Penny-Trader: i think i understand where your thinking from but let me expand a bit on that.
there was nothing released yesterday that would give him any more legal right to postpone Doc and Monkey. They have a legal obligation to share that infor with them and spending that kind of money on prs yesterday is not going to give them any type of a legal stall tactic.
if they dont show Doc and Monkey the information that they are suppose to show, then the SEC will be recieveing a registered letter pointing out the failure to comply.
If this happens Frank has bigger problems on his hand.
I believe just by the sheer volume of news we recieved yesterday, that the pressure is being felt by Frank and crew, and they had to get this info out. This info had been ready to go for some time. these prs where not thrown together last minute, as they are all very well written and where not rushed in their preperation.
This is encouraging to me as it does not appear that these where last minute rush jobs to get news out to head off a problem.
Rod
quote:Originally posted by Dew-it: IMO the reason we got the "bone" yesterday was so that Frankie boy can continue can buy himself some more time and continue to stall the audit results; and to further postpone the meeting with Doc and Imak.
posted
PT's "well written" comment regarding the PRs made me stop and go "huh?" as I didn't think it was all that well written. I re-read it and came to the part that states: "Up to thirty percent of QTN may be used for future financing and debt. With the accelerated growth of QTN, management felt it was time to formally announce this to QBID shareholders.". This part to me was not all that well written becasue I had no idea what it said. But as I though about it I wondered if it meant this. Right now QBID owns 100% of QTN. Frank is saying some of that 100% ownership might be sold off (up to 30%) for "future financing and debt". I think at some point we will come to find out that we only own 70% of QTN. Maybe potential future investors are more interested in owning QTN rather than QBID.
-------------------- The opinions expressed here by myself and others should be taken for what they are: opinions. Beware, many express opinion as fact. Do your own research from reputable sources and never invest more than you can afford to loose. ~,-,-< GatorMan Posts: 752 | From: Springville, Utah | Registered: Jan 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Wangdo try the link below on smallcapcenter.com. I use smallcap quite a bit. It give you 20 and 105 day and lots of other info/indicators for stocks.
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Cool]](cool.gif)
INTERESTING INDEED![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Confused]](confused.gif)
