This is topic QBID XXXV The Road to Transparency in forum Micro Penny Stocks, Penny Stocks $0.10 & Under at Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
http://www.allstocks.com/stockmessageboard/ubb/ultimatebb.php/ubb/get_topic/f/8/t/018267.html

Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
I thought will all the good news out today it was time for a new thread and new theme.

We are on the road to Transparency thanks to the efforts of Doctoall and Imakemoney.

This thread is devoted to you guys.

The path is about to get betten down.

ROd

[ January 11, 2006, 06:00: Message edited by: Bob Frey ]
 
Posted by LEO on :
 
Good thread title PT. Thanks Doc and Imak!!
 
Posted by King Crimson on :
 
QBID high volume days--

2/10/2004...2,147,483,648
4/14/2004...1,825,717,760

today.........1,733,052,723 ...so far

1/09/06......1,724,702,388
1/03/06......1,710,126,531
5/11/2004...1,623,194,752
 
Posted by Wangdo on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
I thought will all the good news out today it was time for a new thread and new theme.

We are on the road to Transparency thanks to the efforts of Doctoall and Imakemoney.

This thread is devoted to you guys.

The path is about to get betten down.

ROd

and where will transparency rd. take us.

i hope it leads north [Big Grin]
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
The Financial Times.....

1/10/2006 - The Financial Times 1/10/06
Main page content: Gay cable TV is in the pink
By Joshua Chaffin
Published: January 9 2006 18:46 | Last updated: January 9 2006 18:46

When Sumner Redstone, chairman of Viacom, endorsed the notion of a gay and lesbian cable television network, viewers soon got Logo. With the backing of Viacom’s MTV Networks, the largest and most powerful collection of channels in the cable universe, it was beamed into millions of homes around the US.


ADVERTISEMENT


An unexpected beneficiary of Mr Redstone’s pronouncement two years ago was Frank Olsen, a little-known broadcasting entrepreneur from Seattle. For more than a decade, Mr Olsen had been toiling to start his own gay cable network. Despite spending $12m from his own pocket, there was not much interest until Mr Redstone chimed in.

“You would be amazed how many people listen when Sumner Redstone speaks,” Mr Olsen recalls. “The whole thing changed.”

Indeed, after launching last July, Mr Olsen’s network, Q Television, is now emerging from the muddle of independent cable networks desperately seeking distribution. Q is available in over 3m homes, and is expecting to lock up distribution deals for 15m to 20m more by the end of this year.

A turning point came in November, when Time Warner Cable, one of the largest operators, awarded Q a so-called “hunting licence”, which has allowed the network to approach its 30 regional divisions around the country to seek distribution. So far, that has brought Q to such diverse markets as Manhattan, Houston and – as of this month – Lincoln, Nebraska.

“I think probably even the Q TV people were surprised they got such a nice response here,” says Beth Scarborough, the president of Time Warner Cable in Lincoln.

One could point out that Mr Olsen, who has dubbed himself the “king of gay media”, had been working on Q for more than three decades. After selling the family bakery, Mr Olsen used the windfall to buy radio stations in the early 1970s. In addition to rock and roll, and news and talk radio, Mr Olsen also began to run gay programming.

The shows were reasonably popular, he claims, even though the broader environment was not hospitable. “The advertisers were always worried about how many customers they would lose for every one they attracted,” says Mr Olsen.

A lot has changed since then. The mainstream media is now full of gay characters and gay programming, from television’s Queer Eye for the Straight Guy and Will and Grace to the film Brokeback Mountain, a cowboy love story that has become an unlikely Oscar front-runner. Companies such as Volkswagen have launched advertising campaigns specifically geared toward gay and lesbian customers.

The economics of cable have also evolved. As the industry matures, operators are looking for niche networks that can add incremental subscribers who might later be enticed to buy add-on services, such as internet connections.

“Cable operators see themselves as supermarkets, and they have to stock their shelves for everyone,” explains Carol Hinnant, vice-president of sales and marketing.

Rather than shooting for a broad audience, Q is only hoping to sign up 1 to 2 per cent of the households in which it is available. Unlike Logo, it is not available as part of a basic cable package. Instead, viewers must request it for $7.95 per month, as they would HBO. “It’s very important that we be invited into the home,” Mr Olsen says.

While it does not offer pornography, that distinction allows Q to be more risqué in its approach than Logo, which Mr Olsen dismisses as “a little vanilla”.

A third gay network, Here, also launched last year, selling its programming in a video-on-demand format.

While gaining access to the New York and San Francisco markets was a milestone for Q, some of its best success has come in smaller markets, such as Portland, Maine, which has never been known for having a high gay population.

Far from being surprised, Mr Olsen notes that more than 60 per cent of his target audience lives in rural areas. Q is all the more appealing to them because its coverage can link them to Gay Pride parades in San Francisco they might not otherwise attend. “We can be a bridge,” he says.

As it enters new markets, Q has also relied on local gay and lesbian networks and grass-roots marketing to try to reach its modest subscription goal.

In November, when it launched its service in the university town of Syracuse, New York, for example, the company threw a party at a local gay bar. The event, which coincided with the university’s annual Homecoming Weekend, honoured a Q presenter, Scott Withers, a Syracuse alumnus who had been elected the university’s Homecoming King in 1995.

“What a difference 10 years makes,” the invitations read. “Syracuse’s Homecoming King is now the queen of gay television!”
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
http://www.marketwatch.com/tools/quotes/newsarticle.asp?g=C6486B4944B0416EBCC9BA7C1FD55264&siteid=mktw&dist=nbs

Q Television Network Marches into the New Year by Concluding Distribution Agreement in Lincoln; GLBT Network Closes First Distribution Deal in Middle America
1/10/2006 10:30:01 AM



BURBANK, Calif., Jan 10, 2006 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Migrating its programming service from major urban markets to middle America, Q Television Network (Pink Sheets:QBID) has announced its launch on the Time Warner Cable Nebraska system, servicing the Lincoln area and the seven colleges and universities in the marketplace.


Lincoln area cable subscribers will be able to sign on for QTN's live, original, gay and lesbian programming as a 24/7 premium network, carried on channel 392 effective immediately, for a monthly fee of $7.95. Subscribers will also need a digital cable box to receive the channel. The launch marks QTN's sixth Time Warner carriage deal and signals the network's first move into both middle America and the surrounding rural communities.

In announcing the carriage agreement, Time Warner Cable Nebraska Division President Beth Scarborough said: "Time Warner Cable is committed to serving the needs and interests of our customers, and Q Television is an ideal partner for reaching out to and including the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender members of our community through innovative and original programming that speaks to their lifestyle and concerns. We're proud to offer Q Television Network programming and believe it will be another quality programming choice for the broad range of people and perspectives we serve in Lincoln."

Added Carol Hinnant, QTN's Vice President, Affiliate Sales & Marketing, "Time Warner Cable is truly steadfast in its objective of connecting with all segments of its customer base, and we look forward to working with them to serve the entertainment and informational needs of the GLBT community in Lincoln. It is our continued goal to reach out and entertain GLBT communities where they have been underserved in the past. Lincoln, as one of the fastest growing non-Sun Belt cities in the U.S. and one of the fastest growing metro areas in the Midwestern region, is a welcome extension of Q's reach."

Q Television previously announced carriage agreements with Time Warner Cable systems in Houston, New York and New Jersey, with previous launches on Time Warner's Rochester, Syracuse and Maine divisions -- all within the last four months. The addition of Lincoln will extend QTN's reach by approximately 3 million digital cable households.

In addition to movies, documentaries and original series, Q Television currently offers its customers five hours of live programming daily, including such hit shows as "Brunch," "QueerEdge with Jack E. Jett," "The Reichen Show," "On Q Live," "Q on the Move," "QTN World News," "Xcess/Access," "On Topic" and "Flesh and Threads."
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
Q Television Network Adds Several Hundred Million Dollars in Assets to Triangle Multi-Media's Bottom-Line
Business Wire - January 10, 2006 09:00

BURBANK, Calif., Jan 10, 2006 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- Triangle Multi-Media (Pink Sheets:QBID) announced today that, in accordance with SAAG, Triangle Multi-Media will start accounting for Q Television Network as a 100% wholly owned subsidiary. This means Triangle Multi-Media common shareholders own one hundred percent of Q Television Network's (QTN) total asset base, including its contracts with Time Warner, Cox Communications, RCN and Australia's SelecTV, as well as advertising revenue, tangible property, subscriber base and an independent audited film library worth over several hundred million dollars.

"Q Television Network has been operating as an independent entity and held in its entirety since it was incorporated. QTN will be accounted for as a wholly owned subsidiary of Triangle Multi-Media in accordance with SAAG. Triangle Multi-Media common shareholders control one hundred percent of Q Television Network," said Frank Olsen, CEO of Triangle Multi-Media and Q Television Network. "Up to thirty percent of QTN may be used for future financing and debt. With the accelerated growth of QTN, management felt it was time to formally announce this to QBID shareholders," added Olsen.
 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
First page! I'm earning my spot in the OP Club today [Smile]
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
Investor Information
1/10/2006 - The Financial Times 1/10/06 www.ft.com
Main page content: Gay cable TV is in the pink
By Joshua Chaffin
Published: January 9 2006 18:46 | Last updated: January 9 2006 18:46

When Sumner Redstone, chairman of Viacom, endorsed the notion of a gay and lesbian cable television network, viewers soon got Logo. With the backing of Viacom’s MTV Networks, the largest and most powerful collection of channels in the cable universe, it was beamed into millions of homes around the US.


ADVERTISEMENT




An unexpected beneficiary of Mr Redstone’s pronouncement two years ago was Frank Olsen, a little-known broadcasting entrepreneur from Seattle. For more than a decade, Mr Olsen had been toiling to start his own gay cable network. Despite spending $12m from his own pocket, there was not much interest until Mr Redstone chimed in.

“You would be amazed how many people listen when Sumner Redstone speaks,” Mr Olsen recalls. “The whole thing changed.”

Indeed, after launching last July, Mr Olsen’s network, Q Television, is now emerging from the muddle of independent cable networks desperately seeking distribution. Q is available in over 3m homes, and is expecting to lock up distribution deals for 15m to 20m more by the end of this year.

A turning point came in November, when Time Warner Cable, one of the largest operators, awarded Q a so-called “hunting licence”, which has allowed the network to approach its 30 regional divisions around the country to seek distribution. So far, that has brought Q to such diverse markets as Manhattan, Houston and – as of this month – Lincoln, Nebraska.

“I think probably even the Q TV people were surprised they got such a nice response here,” says Beth Scarborough, the president of Time Warner Cable in Lincoln.

One could point out that Mr Olsen, who has dubbed himself the “king of gay media”, had been working on Q for more than three decades. After selling the family bakery, Mr Olsen used the windfall to buy radio stations in the early 1970s. In addition to rock and roll, and news and talk radio, Mr Olsen also began to run gay programming.

The shows were reasonably popular, he claims, even though the broader environment was not hospitable. “The advertisers were always worried about how many customers they would lose for every one they attracted,” says Mr Olsen.

A lot has changed since then. The mainstream media is now full of gay characters and gay programming, from television’s Queer Eye for the Straight Guy and Will and Grace to the film Brokeback Mountain, a cowboy love story that has become an unlikely Oscar front-runner. Companies such as Volkswagen have launched advertising campaigns specifically geared toward gay and lesbian customers.

The economics of cable have also evolved. As the industry matures, operators are looking for niche networks that can add incremental subscribers who might later be enticed to buy add-on services, such as internet connections.

“Cable operators see themselves as supermarkets, and they have to stock their shelves for everyone,” explains Carol Hinnant, vice-president of sales and marketing.

Rather than shooting for a broad audience, Q is only hoping to sign up 1 to 2 per cent of the households in which it is available. Unlike Logo, it is not available as part of a basic cable package. Instead, viewers must request it for $7.95 per month, as they would HBO. “It’s very important that we be invited into the home,” Mr Olsen says.

While it does not offer pornography, that distinction allows Q to be more risqué in its approach than Logo, which Mr Olsen dismisses as “a little vanilla”.

A third gay network, Here, also launched last year, selling its programming in a video-on-demand format.

While gaining access to the New York and San Francisco markets was a milestone for Q, some of its best success has come in smaller markets, such as Portland, Maine, which has never been known for having a high gay population.

Far from being surprised, Mr Olsen notes that more than 60 per cent of his target audience lives in rural areas. Q is all the more appealing to them because its coverage can link them to Gay Pride parades in San Francisco they might not otherwise attend. “We can be a bridge,” he says.

As it enters new markets, Q has also relied on local gay and lesbian networks and grass-roots marketing to try to reach its modest subscription goal.

In November, when it launched its service in the university town of Syracuse, New York, for example, the company threw a party at a local gay bar. The event, which coincided with the university’s annual Homecoming Weekend, honoured a Q presenter, Scott Withers, a Syracuse alumnus who had been elected the university’s Homecoming King in 1995.

“What a difference 10 years makes,” the invitations read. “Syracuse’s Homecoming King is now the queen of gay television!”
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
So how long before the bashers jump on the new thread name? LOL

Go Q!
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
Q Television Network Marches into the New Year by Concluding Distribution Agreement in Lincoln; GLBT Network Closes First Distribution Deal in Middle America
01/10/2006 10:30
Migrating its programming service from major urban markets to middle America, Q Television Network (Pink Sheets: QBID) has announced its launch on the Time Warner Cable Nebraska system, servicing the Lincoln area and the seven colleges and universities in the marketplace.

Lincoln area cable subscribers will be able to sign on for QTN's live, original, gay and lesbian programming as a 24/7 premium network, carried on channel 392 effective immediately, for a monthly fee of $7.95. Subscribers will also need a digital cable box to receive the channel. The launch marks QTN's sixth Time Warner carriage deal and signals the network's first move into both middle America and the surrounding rural communities.

In announcing the carriage agreement, Time Warner Cable Nebraska Division President Beth Scarborough said: "Time Warner Cable is committed to serving the needs and interests of our customers, and Q Television is an ideal partner for reaching out to and including the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender members of our community through innovative and original programming that speaks to their lifestyle and concerns. We're proud to offer Q Television Network programming and believe it will be another quality programming choice for the broad range of people and perspectives we serve in Lincoln."

Added Carol Hinnant, QTN's Vice President, Affiliate Sales & Marketing, "Time Warner Cable is truly steadfast in its objective of connecting with all segments of its customer base, and we look forward to working with them to serve the entertainment and informational needs of the GLBT community in Lincoln. It is our continued goal to reach out and entertain GLBT communities where they have been underserved in the past. Lincoln, as one of the fastest growing non-Sun Belt cities in the U.S. and one of the fastest growing metro areas in the Midwestern region, is a welcome extension of Q's reach."

Q Television previously announced carriage agreements with Time Warner Cable systems in Houston, New York and New Jersey, with previous launches on Time Warner's Rochester, Syracuse and Maine divisions -- all within the last four months. The addition of Lincoln will extend QTN's reach by approximately 3 million digital cable households.

In addition to movies, documentaries and original series, Q Television currently offers its customers five hours of live programming daily, including such hit shows as "Brunch," "QueerEdge with Jack E. Jett," "The Reichen Show," "On Q Live," "Q on the Move," "QTN World News," "Xcess/Access," "On Topic" and "Flesh and Threads."
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
Q Television Network Marches into the New Year by Concluding Distribution Agreement in Lincoln; GLBT Network Closes First Distribution Deal in Middle America
01/10/2006 10:30
Migrating its programming service from major urban markets to middle America, Q Television Network (Pink Sheets: QBID) has announced its launch on the Time Warner Cable Nebraska system, servicing the Lincoln area and the seven colleges and universities in the marketplace.

Lincoln area cable subscribers will be able to sign on for QTN's live, original, gay and lesbian programming as a 24/7 premium network, carried on channel 392 effective immediately, for a monthly fee of $7.95. Subscribers will also need a digital cable box to receive the channel. The launch marks QTN's sixth Time Warner carriage deal and signals the network's first move into both middle America and the surrounding rural communities.

In announcing the carriage agreement, Time Warner Cable Nebraska Division President Beth Scarborough said: "Time Warner Cable is committed to serving the needs and interests of our customers, and Q Television is an ideal partner for reaching out to and including the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender members of our community through innovative and original programming that speaks to their lifestyle and concerns. We're proud to offer Q Television Network programming and believe it will be another quality programming choice for the broad range of people and perspectives we serve in Lincoln."

Added Carol Hinnant, QTN's Vice President, Affiliate Sales & Marketing, "Time Warner Cable is truly steadfast in its objective of connecting with all segments of its customer base, and we look forward to working with them to serve the entertainment and informational needs of the GLBT community in Lincoln. It is our continued goal to reach out and entertain GLBT communities where they have been underserved in the past. Lincoln, as one of the fastest growing non-Sun Belt cities in the U.S. and one of the fastest growing metro areas in the Midwestern region, is a welcome extension of Q's reach."

Q Television previously announced carriage agreements with Time Warner Cable systems in Houston, New York and New Jersey, with previous launches on Time Warner's Rochester, Syracuse and Maine divisions -- all within the last four months. The addition of Lincoln will extend QTN's reach by approximately 3 million digital cable households.

In addition to movies, documentaries and original series, Q Television currently offers its customers five hours of live programming daily, including such hit shows as "Brunch," "QueerEdge with Jack E. Jett," "The Reichen Show," "On Q Live," "Q on the Move," "QTN World News," "Xcess/Access," "On Topic" and "Flesh and Threads."
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
vol 1.8B - lots of dumping but the bid keeps going back to .0002
13X.0003
2X.0002
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
Q Television Network Adds Several Hundred Million Dollars in Assets to Triangle Multi-Media's Bottom-Line
01/10/2006 09:00
Triangle Multi-Media (Pink Sheets: QBID) announced today that, in accordance with SAAG, Triangle Multi-Media will start accounting for Q Television Network as a 100% wholly owned subsidiary. This means Triangle Multi-Media common shareholders own one hundred percent of Q Television Network's (QTN) total asset base, including its contracts with Time Warner, Cox Communications, RCN and Australia's SelecTV, as well as advertising revenue, tangible property, subscriber base and an independent audited film library worth over several hundred million dollars.

"Q Television Network has been operating as an independent entity and held in its entirety since it was incorporated. QTN will be accounted for as a wholly owned subsidiary of Triangle Multi-Media in accordance with SAAG. Triangle Multi-Media common shareholders control one hundred percent of Q Television Network," said Frank Olsen, CEO of Triangle Multi-Media and Q Television Network. "Up to thirty percent of QTN may be used for future financing and debt. With the accelerated growth of QTN, management felt it was time to formally announce this to QBID shareholders," added Olsen.
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
and just so we dont forget

quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
do I have to wear the dunce hat too? LOL!


YES!!!! and heres what you will look like in the garage.

 -
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
So did anyone finally figure what SAAG really mean? I can't find any info on it.
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
And the Ode to our cheesecake warriors.

Okay we have a third contestant, here they are in order

 -  -  -
-- BottomLiner --- MJM -------------- Boss Hoss Trader ---------

Who will win, who will blow, stay tuned to find out
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
as soon as they want. we have a large parking garrage in vegas for them.


You know they will be there [Big Grin]


well im off to work so i will be a stranger till after 10 pm now have a good day guys.

Rod

quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
So how long before the bashers jump on the new thread name? LOL

Go Q!


 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
Let's hope it's a 40B trading day (so all the extra stock Frank's dumping is dried up =p )

Doc and Imak, if we hit big I'll buy you a round at the next shareholder meeting [Razz]
 
Posted by Wangdo on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
So did anyone finally figure what SAAG really mean? I can't find any info on it.

Standard Accounting and Auditing Guidelines

http://www.ifac.org/Guidance/
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
ok one more

http://www.marketwatch.com/tools/quotes/newsarticle.asp?g=1BD54A070E794ED3AFA1A0B81C1C9013&siteid=mktw&dist=nbs


Q Television Network Announces Premiere Party for the Midwest Episode of 'Q On the Move with Nick Oram' at Sidetrack in Chicago
1/10/2006 11:30:29 AM


BURBANK, Calif., Jan 10, 2006 /PRNewswire-FirstCall via COMTEX/ -- Q Television Network (OTC Pink Sheets: QBID), America's groundbreaking network for gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transgendered individuals (GLBT), has announced a special Chicago premiere and party for "Q On the Move with Nick Oram." Event will be held at the famous Sidetrack nightclub in Chicago on January 25th. Q Television Network is now available on RCN's Chicago cable system, channel 270.

(Photo: http://www.newscom.com/cgi-bin/prnh/20060110/LATU073 )

What: Q Television Network premiere and party for the Midwest episode
of the hot globetrotting travel series, "Q On the Move"
featuring Chicago. Evening highlights will include giveaways,
special prizes and sponsored reception.

Who: Special appearance by Nick Oram, Host and Executive Producer
of "Q On the Move"

When: 7-11 pm, Wednesday, January 25, 2006
8 pm - Premiere of "Q On the Move" promptly begins

Where: Sidetrack
3349 North Halsted Street, Chicago IL 60657
http://www.sidetrackchicago.com

Sponsors: RCN, Sidetrack, Gay Games(R)

Parking: Valet Parking Available


Host Nick Oram takes his "Q On the Move" cameras all across the world, introducing his viewers to all of the remarkable places he visits as well as the uncanny and inspiring people he meets. Now in its second year of production, Oram brings to Q Television Network (QTN) viewers one of the hottest, most entertaining gay television shows offered anywhere. Nick and the QTN cameras will be at Sidetrack on January 25th to bring you into the action too. For more information on Nick Oram and "Q On the Move" visit http://www.nickoram.com and http://www.qtelevision.com.

For more information on Gay Games(R) please visit: http://www.GayGamesChicago.org/

Q Television Network currently offers its customers five hours of live programming daily, kicking off its morning fare with the new hit show "Brunch," which stars Honey Labrador and Scott Withers. The day ends with QTN's signature series "On Q Live," a fun-filled adventure of news, guests, sports and entertainment. QTN also offers its customers original programs such as "Q on the Move with Nick Oram," the first-ever travel show for the GLBT community; "QueerEdge with Jack E. Jett," a live nightly talk show that takes viewers to the farthest reaches of "Queerdom"; and "Flesh and Threads," a dance show that brings fashion and the gay beat to the dance floor.

About Q Television
 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
Screen AActor's Guild?

[Razz]
 
Posted by buckwheatbob on :
 
Doc and Imak must have used a propane torch to warm up Q's seat. Nice going guys !!! [Smile]
 
Posted by Rich735 on :
 
Wish the pps would move!!!
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
SAAG, Sorry Ass Arogant Gamblers. Just guessing.
 
Posted by LEO on :
 
Southern Alberta Art Gallery...
 
Posted by King Crimson on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
So did anyone finally figure what SAAG really mean? I can't find any info on it.

Shareholders Asses Are Gone
 
Posted by Rich735 on :
 
How many prs are we going to get today. And will we get the BIG ONE?!!!!!!!!1
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
SAAG, Sorry Ass Arogant Gamblers. Just guessing.

DIG
I think we have a winner ... [Big Grin]
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
SAAG, Sorry Ass Arogant Gamblers. Just guessing.

LOL We have complied with that for a while now if that is the case!! [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
Sell All Assets of the Gay
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
Ode to our Transparency Seekers

 -  -
 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
About to hit 2B
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
Silly PUMPERS.
 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
Can we see current L2s?

[Smile]
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
Aw shucks, it were'nt nothin!
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
.0002x.0003
5x14

2 BILLION
 
Posted by Rich735 on :
 
2 BIL
 
Posted by skrewball on :
 
Ok, I hate to be the uneducated one of the group...but could someone explain the signifigance of this statement?

Q Television Network Adds Several Hundred Million Dollars in Assets to Triangle Multi-Media's Bottom-Line

Do that mean we are a step closer to reporting? Does that mean that Q-TV is worth "several hundred million dollars"? Thanks.
 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by skrewball:
Ok, I hate to be the uneducated one of the group...but could someone explain the signifigance of this statement?

Q Television Network Adds Several Hundred Million Dollars in Assets to Triangle Multi-Media's Bottom-Line

Do that mean we are a step closer to reporting? Does that mean that Q-TV is worth "several hundred million dollars"? Thanks.

Means QTV is worth several hundred million, and it is owned in full (100%) by TMM (which is the company that QBID shares represent).

This is important because it means the company we own in turn owns all of QTV (meaning *we* own all of QTV). Apparently there was some doubt about this before.
 
Posted by milliam on :
 
Don't forget this one:

1/9/2006 - DVD Release

Shareholders,

The DVD for Triangle Multi-Media shareholders will begin being shipped to shareholders next week.
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
vol 2.03B
4X.0002
13X.0003
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
I refuse to answer under the grounds that it may tend to incriminate me. [Wink]


quote:
Originally posted by skrewball:
Ok, I hate to be the uneducated one of the group...but could someone explain the signifigance of this statement?

Q Television Network Adds Several Hundred Million Dollars in Assets to Triangle Multi-Media's Bottom-Line

Do that mean we are a step closer to reporting? Does that mean that Q-TV is worth "several hundred million dollars"? Thanks.


 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
Ode to our Transparency Seekers

 -  -

Another good one, MM.

I'm gonna save this for future reference ... how else will I be able to recognize Doc and imakmony (monkey) when we get to Vegas? [Big Grin]
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
WOW. Just incase nobody looked. That story on QTN in the financial times is on the front page of the website!

http://news.ft.com/home/us

Right beside the story of GOOGLE
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
How about free ballons and hot dogs. [Cool]

quote:
Originally posted by milliam:
Don't forget this one:

1/9/2006 - DVD Release

Shareholders,

The DVD for Triangle Multi-Media shareholders will begin being shipped to shareholders next week.


 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
nice title pennytrader i like it. good luck to you all this year could be our year qbidians.

last year certainly was very frustrating for me and many others as we saw our little q progress so very nicely and our value get crushed.

lets just pray and hope that 2006 is the year we see huge profits cuz im dieing to get to vegas i have never been their and i love to gamble.

good luck to you all sincerely op club pres / the origional qbidiot.

26 million on lockdown.
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
WOW. Just incase nobody looked. That story on QTN in the financial times is on the front page of the website!

http://news.ft.com/home/us

Right beside the story of GOOGLE

Dam. That is pretty huge. Talk about exposure
 
Posted by Rich735 on :
 
AUDIT FRANK!!!! Today would be a good day!!
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
WOW. Just incase nobody looked. That story on QTN in the financial times is on the front page of the website!

http://news.ft.com/home/us

Right beside the story of GOOGLE

Dam. That is pretty huge. Talk about exposure
this is huge in my mind alot of people go to this website i imagine and being right next to the google aritcle can only be good. God bless qtv and all involved. [Big Grin] [Big Grin] [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Wangdo on :
 
new all time high in volume
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
Who wants to lay odds on a 3 billion share day?
 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
Uhm... er... my volume report just dropped to 0.

What's everyone else seeing?
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
YEP there is the new all time record for volume in the first 2 hours! LMAO.

I am still sitting on the sidelines but im wondering if Frank has something up his sleeve this week with that major exposure in the financial times and the 3 PR's today.
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
Ya thats great, it looks like they are in England, because it says at the top that all times are London time.


quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
WOW. Just incase nobody looked. That story on QTN in the financial times is on the front page of the website!

http://news.ft.com/home/us

Right beside the story of GOOGLE


 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
Is Ameritrade bugged? Anyone else seeing 0 volume?
 
Posted by skrewball on :
 
AMeritrade is broken too [Smile] Too much volume today...hmmm, maybe I'll pick up a couple of million. It's better than blowing it all on booze!
 
Posted by Rich735 on :
 
Esteban99 on my Etrade it is now (-2.1 BIL)!!!!!
 
Posted by manfromjax on :
 
But who is dumping these Shares? When does it stop? I hope there is a reson for this madness? The only reason I can think of is to avoid having to take on any liabilities. Put it all on the back of the shareholders.
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
MT, is the volume somebdy selling or buying? What is the ratio? Thanks in advance.
 
Posted by manfromjax on :
 
Crap.. here come to those .0001 again! [Mad]
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
somebody just bought at .0001?
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
MT, is the volume somebdy selling or buying? What is the ratio? Thanks in advance.

Definately big time selling going on at .0002. Its probably like 80% so far today. Although, this UBSS MM keeps on coming on the bid at .0002 so it makes ya wonder. But yeah, definately big time dumping
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
I think they were just painting the tape. I saw a trade for 1000 shares at 0001. I guess the buyback is over now too! LOL
 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
At this point I starting to believe that Frank saves up good info and releases it at the same time he releases a few billion more shares.

I'm hopeful that interest in the stock overcomes the dilution.
 
Posted by Etch on :
 
Volume on scottrade elite changed to negative at just over 2bil and is counting backwards now. hahaha, what gives?
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
Hey Penny-Trader (Rod)
Better order some more chairs for the parking garage ... the OP Club just lost some members. [Roll Eyes]
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
Q Television Network Announces Premiere Party for the Midwest Episode of 'Q On the Move with Nick Oram' at Sidetrack in Chicago
Frankie boy couldn't resist a fluff PR LOL!

Jan 10, 2006 11:30:00 AM
BURBANK, Calif., Jan. 10 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Q Television Network (OTC Pink Sheets: QBID), America's groundbreaking network for gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transgendered individuals (GLBT), has announced a special Chicago premiere and party for "Q On the Move with Nick Oram." Event will be held at the famous Sidetrack nightclub in Chicago on January 25th. Q Television Network is now available on RCN's Chicago cable system, channel 270.
 
Posted by Doctoall on :
 
HELP WANTED: Okay so you all know that we are planning on having a meeting in Burbank with "Q" on Thursday Jauary 12th 2006.

However, to date that have not given us a specific time for the meeting. We are asking that throughout today and tomorrow, you give a call to "Q" in Burbank and Palm Springs and remind them about the meeting on Thursday.

In order words please help us to keep the pressure on them. Please call the following numbers and if you cannot get through to Frank, Rene or Randy, then leave messages telling them that you expect the meeting to take place and you want to know the time.

The numbers are: Burbank: 1-818-848-5800
Palm Springs 1-760-323-4455.

It may not help but the effort would be appreciated, let them know that today is the day we want answers. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
bottomliner dont you have to consult me before we lose club members hehe just joking you are the founder and ceo of the op club do as you feel necessary to maintain the complete purity of the op club.

now as for me this day is as wacky as it gets for qbid shareholders lots of news volume off the charts and we are stuck as usual. not sure what to make of it but if i could i would be buying into this at this point the risk to reward seems pretty good.

most investors are down over 80% i would guess so those that are getting in right now if and when we run are gonna have a hefty return on their money.

can anyone say 100 bagger it doesnt hurt to dream and it could just get you a full membership to the op club haha.
 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
Can anyone see the volume? I think the volume broke most trading sites.
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
2.46 billion according to my alphatrade
 
Posted by tech1 on :
 
On one account, I show 2.5 Billion. On another, I've got 29.5 Billion.
 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
29.5 bill would be great! No more float to release.

Here's hoping for a .0004 close!
 
Posted by justplayin on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
Q Television Network Announces Premiere Party for the Midwest Episode of 'Q On the Move with Nick Oram' at Sidetrack in Chicago
Frankie boy couldn't resist a fluff PR LOL!

Jan 10, 2006 11:30:00 AM
BURBANK, Calif., Jan. 10 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Q Television Network (OTC Pink Sheets: QBID), America's groundbreaking network for gays, lesbians, bisexuals and transgendered individuals (GLBT), has announced a special Chicago premiere and party for "Q On the Move with Nick Oram." Event will be held at the famous Sidetrack nightclub in Chicago on January 25th. Q Television Network is now available on RCN's Chicago cable system, channel 270.

Xtra shares being sold to cover the cost of the party at an EXPENSIVE club??

C'mon Frank, don't let Doc and the rest of us down!
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
hey DOC, you know anything about this???a new CEO???

Posted by: brianinsoca
In reply to: skunksyard who wrote msg# 206620 Date:1/10/2006 11:16:23 AM
Post #of 206731

Good morning everyone. I do not post much, but do lurk.. have been with this stock for two years and change.. I called media city last night,1-818-848-5800, which is in burbank, in the thinking that this is the studio... No one was in, but did get a answering service.. asking if you do not know your party's ext., press six.. I did, and ext. for ceo, Marty Giller, is 214.. not sure what this all means.. any ideas, tia
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
2,461,417,725 volume on scottrade.
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
Posted by: Sputnik
In reply to: chevdawg18 who wrote msg# 206731 Date:1/10/2006 12:29:02 PM
Post #of 206736

Someone needs to tell Doctoall and the other fellow to send the communication to the Sec. of State in Washington that TMM is in violation of the State of Washington's law concerning opening their financials. Frank, Rene and Richard will just ignore phone calls to them. If you can please post this where these fellas post. Thanks
 
Posted by justplayin on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
Posted by: Sputnik
In reply to: chevdawg18 who wrote msg# 206731 Date:1/10/2006 12:29:02 PM
Post #of 206736

Someone needs to tell Doctoall and the other fellow to send the communication to the Sec. of State in Washington that TMM is in violation of the State of Washington's law concerning opening their financials. Frank, Rene and Richard will just ignore phone calls to them. If you can please post this where these fellas post. Thanks

Not just the state of Washington, but the SEC! Shareholders have a right to request a meeting for the infromation. This is bigger than a state thing.
 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
As far as we know the meeting is still this Thursday. And Doc and Imak are still going to be asking to see the financials, right?
 
Posted by Ad astra on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by justplayin:


[/qb]

Not just the state of Washington, but the SEC! Shareholders have a right to request a meeting for the infromation. This is bigger than a state thing. [/QB][/QUOTE]
-------------

No, it's not. It is a state thing. Washington State law.

Thanks Doc for all of your help.
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by noah129:
bottomliner dont you have to consult me before we lose club members

noah
Just helping out ... I know you're a busy guy.

Check the posts today and I think you'll agree with my decision. Man, some people are changing their opinions about Q with every post. I guess they believe that making 180-degree turns every hour gives them a better chance of being right someday ... [Big Grin]

By the way, Rod volunteered to be parking garage monitor ... and I just couldn't say no to him. But the final decision is yours ... Rod will understand, no matter what you decide.

Right, Rod?
 
Posted by Wangdo on :
 
Bumpity Bump Bump Bump
quote:
Originally posted by Doctoall:
HELP WANTED: Okay so you all know that we are planning on having a meeting in Burbank with "Q" on Thursday Jauary 12th 2006.

However, to date that have not given us a specific time for the meeting. We are asking that throughout today and tomorrow, you give a call to "Q" in Burbank and Palm Springs and remind them about the meeting on Thursday.

In order words please help us to keep the pressure on them. Please call the following numbers and if you cannot get through to Frank, Rene or Randy, then leave messages telling them that you expect the meeting to take place and you want to know the time.

The numbers are: Burbank: 1-818-848-5800
Palm Springs 1-760-323-4455.

It may not help but the effort would be appreciated, let them know that today is the day we want answers. [Big Grin]


 
Posted by redelmo19 on :
 
WHAT IS WRONG WITH QBID
 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
I'm still completely behind Q, even when 3B doesn't move the price [Razz]

We'll get there. Any L2's still working? I think Ameritrade is kaput on the volume for the day.

My guess is a bunch of news today, then audit tomorrow, meeting on Thursday.

This is a very exciting week for all of us.
 
Posted by Deg's wife on :
 
I sure hope you are right, Este!! This last year has given me a stomach ulcer and gas [Roll Eyes]
 
Posted by redelmo19 on :
 
NEWS

Business Editors / Entertainment Editors

BURBANK, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Jan. 10, 2006--
First graph, first sentence and second graph, second
sentence of release should read xxx in accordance with GAAP (sted in
accordance with SAAG).

The corrected release reads:

Q TELEVISION NETWORK ADDS SEVERAL HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS IN
ASSETS TO TRIANGLE MULTI-MEDIA'S BOTTOM-LINE

Triangle Multi-Media (Pink Sheets:QBID) announced today that, in
accordance with GAAP, Triangle Multi-Media will start accounting for Q
Television Network as a 100% wholly owned subsidiary. This means
Triangle Multi-Media common shareholders own one hundred percent of Q
Television Network's (QTN) total asset base, including its contracts
with Time Warner, Cox Communications, RCN and Australia's SelecTV, as
well as advertising revenue, tangible property, subscriber base and an
independent audited film library worth over several hundred million
dollars.
"Q Television Network has been operating as an independent entity
and held in its entirety since it was incorporated. QTN will be
accounted for as a wholly owned subsidiary of Triangle Multi-Media in
accordance with GAAP. Triangle Multi-Media common shareholders control
one hundred percent of Q Television Network," said Frank Olsen, CEO of
Triangle Multi-Media and Q Television Network. "Up to thirty percent
of QTN may be used for future financing and debt. With the accelerated
growth of QTN, management felt it was time to formally announce this
to QBID shareholders," added Olsen.

About Q Television

This 24/7 premium television network is organized to create,
develop and feature television programming for the gay and lesbian
community, including live & interactive content every weeknight, plus
sports, information and entertainment. While the company expects much
of its subscriber base to be comprised of members of the gay and
lesbian population, management also believes that quality programming
about the gay and lesbian experience, designed to entertain, educate
and inform, will attract many other segments of the viewing public.
The company's programming is available on a subscription basis to
those desiring to subscribe. The monthly fee varies by region of the
country. The network is telecast 24 hours per day, 7 days per week and
features a variety of live and original programming. Q Television is
available on such blue chip cable systems as Time Warner, Cox
Communications and RCN, among others, with availability approaching 3
million digital cable households in the U.S. Q Television Network is
the official network of Gay Games(r) VII. The network is also
ad-supported. For further information on programming and
subscriptions, please visit www.qtelevision.com.


KEYWORD: NORTH AMERICA CALIFORNIA UNITED STATES
INDUSTRY KEYWORD: ENTERTAINMENT TV AND RADIO CONSUMER GAY & LESBIAN
SOURCE: Q Television Network


CONTACT INFORMATION:
for Q Television Network
Media Contact:
Jim Strzalkowski, 818-338-3555
jim*prioritypr.net
or
Investor Relations:
Richard Brown, 617-314-7379
Staff*EquityRelations.com
 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
Well, time to get busy with other things, I'll check in periodically this afternoon.
 
Posted by Farley on :
 
Doc: You have PM.
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
can we get an uptick? pwease..........
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
Oh its GAAP not SAAG... I guess he was still drunk when he wrote the PR.
 
Posted by redelmo19 on :
 
hahahah this qbid is a scam , get out while u can
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
bid is growing.
Vol 2.58B
8X.0002
9X.0003
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
hey dew-it this is not helping your case in getting into the op club. hahaha. really man i can understand your frustration but why rip on franky when you dont know all the details yet.

maybe the ol fatty will surprise us one day. maybe he'll even buyback and retire some shares for us too. this has a long time yet to play out. i would be much more worried if we didnt have big deals with major players like time warner for instance. i dont think they would go near us if they thought we were about to go bankrupt. all in my silly qbidiots humble opinion.

good luck to you all. hey where is our qbidian whizard(whizknock)? i would like to hear from him see what he thinks of all of this.

all we have to do is launch ......buyback shares............retire them.......... get half the world to love us..........(actually just a small portion would do)........... and keep on truckin hahahahah..........

qbids gonna make someone rich who i dont know.
 
Posted by redelmo19 on :
 
QBID IS BULL****
 
Posted by Deg's wife on :
 
redelmo...Big Bird is calling you
 
Posted by redelmo19 on :
 
No seriously , q bid is a waste of money
 
Posted by Doctoall on :
 
There is no doubt that "if" Frank and Randy do not have the planned meeting on Thursday,we have the letters ready for WA State. Let them call us out we are ready [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Marcus on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by redelmo19:
No seriously , q bid is a waste of money

OK, we can go the fourth grade route and my reply would be "NO IT'S NOT!!!"

Or we could act like intelligent adults and you could explain your position...
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
Redelmo19 im going to send my death squad after you.

 -
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
Noah, no offense to you or anyone else here. I am not interested in trying to get into any club or go to Vegas, or eat cheesecake, or sit in any garage etc. And you are right I don't know all the details, none of us do. I specualate all the time as does everyone else. It is not knowing the details that chaps my hide. We as investors should know the details - that all. Finally, I am here to make money not friends (again no offense to anyone). I have sunk a considerable amount of cash in this, as many of us have. So I b!tch and complain. Does that make a basher? I WANT QBID PPS to increase NOT decrease. This is our money Franfie boy is playing with and I would love if Ole fatty boy would pleasantly surprise us. Obviously, as negative as I maybe, I do want to believe otherwise I would have sold all or a porition my position lost and go out.

quote:
Originally posted by noah129:
hey dew-it this is not helping your case in getting into the op club. hahaha. really man i can understand your frustration but why rip on franky when you dont know all the details yet.

maybe the ol fatty will surprise us one day. maybe he'll even buyback and retire some shares for us too. this has a long time yet to play out. i would be much more worried if we didnt have big deals with major players like time warner for instance. i dont think they would go near us if they thought we were about to go bankrupt. all in my silly qbidiots humble opinion.

good luck to you all. hey where is our qbidian whizard(whizknock)? i would like to hear from him see what he thinks of all of this.

all we have to do is launch ......buyback shares............retire them.......... get half the world to love us..........(actually just a small portion would do)........... and keep on truckin hahahahah..........

qbids gonna make someone rich who i dont know.


 
Posted by Jennifercd10 on :
 

 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Rich735:
Wish the pps would move!!!

It will...just as soon as the official docs are released.

Great news today by the way! [Big Grin]
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
Noah, no offense to you or anyone else here. I am not interested in trying to get into any club or go to Vegas, or eat cheesecake, or sit in any garage etc. And you are right I don't know all the details, none of us do. I specualate all the time as does everyone else. It is not knowing the details that chaps my hide. We as investors should know the details - that all. Finally, I am here to make money not friends (again no offense to anyone). I have sunk a considerable amount of cash in this, as many of us have. So I b!tch and complain. Does that make a basher? I WANT QBID PPS to increase NOT decrease. This is our money Franfie boy is playing with and I would love if Ole fatty boy would pleasantly surprise us. Obviously, as negative as I maybe, I do want to believe otherwise I would have sold all or a porition my position lost and go out.

quote:
Originally posted by noah129:
hey dew-it this is not helping your case in getting into the op club. hahaha. really man i can understand your frustration but why rip on franky when you dont know all the details yet.

maybe the ol fatty will surprise us one day. maybe he'll even buyback and retire some shares for us too. this has a long time yet to play out. i would be much more worried if we didnt have big deals with major players like time warner for instance. i dont think they would go near us if they thought we were about to go bankrupt. all in my silly qbidiots humble opinion.

good luck to you all. hey where is our qbidian whizard(whizknock)? i would like to hear from him see what he thinks of all of this.

all we have to do is launch ......buyback shares............retire them.......... get half the world to love us..........(actually just a small portion would do)........... and keep on truckin hahahahah..........

qbids gonna make someone rich who i dont know.


your position is understandable and please dont take me too seriously i was only joking about the club( obnoxiously positive) and i understand that the real bottomline with all of us is we are trying to make money or recoup our losses ect........ now when i found qbid i never intended on this becoming such a big part of my life but it has.

i also never imagined that i would relate to other internet posters so intimately about a stock choice but i have. if this thing ever takes off i do plan on meeting some on this board and from ihub in vegas i think that would be a real blast to meet all that would attend something of that nature.

now in regards to not wanting cheesecake i would simply reccomend getting some serious psychological help asap. something is seriously wrong with you (just joking).

please all that invest in pinkies remember one thing THEY ARE FU$#IN PINKIES. they are not required to follow standards set out for fully reporting companies.

i as many others hope and do feel one day qbid will become fully reporting but until then we are at the mercy of franko and we should i feel send him positive vibes and hope he responds by rewarding the longs here.

i also want to give a big thanx to doc and imakemoney for putting some pressure under qtv to get its act together. we are not sure what they will get to actually see and further more we arent sure what they will be able to share with us after they see it. i simply ask to doc and imake give us a [Big Grin] or a [Mad] i dont think that would be considered insider trading hahaha.

26 million long and strong. lets get an uptick alrighty then.......
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
just curious has anyone sold at .0003 lately? or bought at .0001?
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
noah,

I am cool with that.
 
Posted by Wangdo on :
 
Movin' this up again

quote:
Originally posted by Doctoall:
HELP WANTED: Okay so you all know that we are planning on having a meeting in Burbank with "Q" on Thursday Jauary 12th 2006.

However, to date that have not given us a specific time for the meeting. We are asking that throughout today and tomorrow, you give a call to "Q" in Burbank and Palm Springs and remind them about the meeting on Thursday.

In order words please help us to keep the pressure on them. Please call the following numbers and if you cannot get through to Frank, Rene or Randy, then leave messages telling them that you expect the meeting to take place and you want to know the time.

The numbers are: Burbank: 1-818-848-5800
Palm Springs 1-760-323-4455.

It may not help but the effort would be appreciated, let them know that today is the day we want answers. [Big Grin]


 
Posted by one2watchny on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by noah129:
just curious has anyone sold at .0003 lately? or bought at .0001?

I did sell GMCI at 3 and got in to Q at 2 [Big Grin]
 
Posted by redelmo19 on :
 
Get out of Q now!
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
GAAP

http://www.investopedia.com/terms/g/gaap.asp

The common set of accounting principles, standards and procedures that companies use to compile their financial statements. GAAP are a combination of authoritative standards (set by policy boards) and simply the commonly accepted ways of recording and reporting accounting information.


GAAP are imposed on companies so that investors have a minimum level of consistency in the financial statements they use when analyzing companies for investment purposes. GAAP cover such things as revenue recognition, balance sheet item classification and outstanding share measurements. Companies are expected to follow GAAP rules when reporting their financial data via financial statements. If a financial statement is not prepared using GAAP principles, be very wary!

That said, keep in mind that GAAP is only a set of standards. There is plenty of room within GAAP for unscrupulous accountants to distort figures. So, even when a company uses GAAP, you still need to scrutinize its financial statements
 
Posted by kaos on :
 
CORRECTING and REPLACING Q Television Network Adds Several Hundred Million Dollars in Assets to Triangle Multi-Media's Bottom-Line
1:06p ET January 10, 2006 (Business Wire) First graph, first sentence and second graph, second sentence of release should read xxx in accordance with GAAP (sted in accordance with SAAG).

The corrected release reads:

Q TELEVISION NETWORK ADDS SEVERAL HUNDRED MILLION DOLLARS IN ASSETS TO TRIANGLE MULTI-MEDIA'S BOTTOM-LINE

Triangle Multi-Media (Pink Sheets:QBID) announced today that, in accordance with GAAP, Triangle Multi-Media will start accounting for Q Television Network as a 100% wholly owned subsidiary. This means Triangle Multi-Media common shareholders own one hundred percent of Q Television Network's (QTN) total asset base, including its contracts with Time Warner, Cox Communications, RCN and Australia's SelecTV, as well as advertising revenue, tangible property, subscriber base and an independent audited film library worth over several hundred million dollars.

"Q Television Network has been operating as an independent entity and held in its entirety since it was incorporated. QTN will be accounted for as a wholly owned subsidiary of Triangle Multi-Media in accordance with GAAP. Triangle Multi-Media common shareholders control one hundred percent of Q Television Network," said Frank Olsen, CEO of Triangle Multi-Media and Q Television Network. "Up to thirty percent of QTN may be used for future financing and debt. With the accelerated growth of QTN, management felt it was time to formally announce this to QBID shareholders," added Olsen.

About Q Television

This 24/7 premium television network is organized to create, develop and feature television programming for the gay and lesbian community, including live & interactive content every weeknight, plus sports, information and entertainment. While the company expects much of its subscriber base to be comprised of members of the gay and lesbian population, management also believes that quality programming about the gay and lesbian experience, designed to entertain, educate and inform, will attract many other segments of the viewing public.

The company's programming is available on a subscription basis to those desiring to subscribe. The monthly fee varies by region of the country. The network is telecast 24 hours per day, 7 days per week and features a variety of live and original programming. Q Television is available on such blue chip cable systems as Time Warner, Cox Communications and RCN, among others, with availability approaching 3 million digital cable households in the U.S. Q Television Network is the official network of Gay Games(r) VII. The network is also ad-supported. For further information on programming and subscriptions, please visit www.qtelevision.com.

SOURCE: Q Television Network

for Q Television Network Media Contact: Jim Strzalkowski, 818-338-3555 jim*prioritypr.net or Investor Relations: Richard Brown, 617-314-7379 Staff*EquityRelations.com
 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by redelmo19:
Get out of Q now!

Potter will give you 50 cents on the dollar!!
 
Posted by Etch on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by noah129:
just curious has anyone sold at .0003 lately? or bought at .0001?

I've had 5mil sell order in * .0003 for a couple hours now, hasnt filled yet.
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
YES MASTER

quote:
Originally posted by redelmo19:
Get out of Q now!


 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
Just called the burbank studio. Spoke with the assistant and tried to speak with Marty Giller who was rumored to be the new CEO. After much transferring, i never got to speak with him but the assistant told me that he was not the CEO but an operations manager.
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
vol 2.7B
4x.0002
9X.0003
 
Posted by RNINALVNG on :
 
MillerTIME
Member


Member Rated:
posted January 10, 2006 12:26
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
hey DOC, you know anything about this???a new CEO???

Posted by: brianinsoca
In reply to: skunksyard who wrote msg# 206620 Date:1/10/2006 11:16:23 AM
Post #of 206731

Good morning everyone. I do not post much, but do lurk.. have been with this stock for two years and change.. I called media city last night,1-818-848-5800, which is in burbank, in the thinking that this is the studio... No one was in, but did get a answering service.. asking if you do not know your party's ext., press six.. I did, and ext. for ceo, Marty Giller, is 214.. not sure what this all means.. any ideas, tia
_______________________________________

MillerTime...I called the studio and was informed that Marty Giller was the CEO of the studio before Q became involved...he is now a "tape operator"....ouch!

P.S. If I could type and cut & paste quicker I would have beaten your post...lol.
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
Frank needs to remind himself that he said Q was gonna be profitable early this year, thus no reason to use QTN assets for financing and debt. I feel its time to tell him so.
Also it would be much more appropriate if he would use some of his 53% interest toward those things instead of taking more from the shareholders as usual.
 
Posted by Team Sleep on :
 
"Several hundred million dollars" More fluff... if you had a company who's assests rose by a substantial amount, you'd be real specific about that amount, not vague. This is another reason this network scares me.
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
Interesting...did anyone notice this sentence from the the PR"...an independent audited film library worth over several hundred million dollars." Frankie had been telling us over and over that it was worth $1B. When I think several hundered I am thinking $200-300, maybe $400M max. I guess the audit revealed it was worth less that the $1B. I guess eventually we may find out the exact worth when the audit comes out.
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
DOC and IMAK, Just wondering if you will be finding out about Subscriber numbers when you go on thursday.

I believe the Sub numbers are arguable the most important information of all.
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
good point.

quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
Frank needs to remind himself that he said Q was gonna be profitable early this year, thus no reason to use QTN assets for financing and debt. I feel its time to tell him so.
Also it would be much more appropriate if he would use some of his 53% interest toward those things instead of taking more from the shareholders as usual.


 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
Profitable businesses still take out loans.
 
Posted by Pincher47 on :
 
All this news, largest day, and yet it still doesn't move. Same old Q
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
Interesting...did anyone notice this sentence from the the PR"...an independent audited film library worth over several hundred million dollars." Frankie had been telling us over and over that it was worth $1B. When I think several hundered I am thinking $200-300, maybe $400M max. I guess the audit revealed it was worth less that the $1B. I guess eventually we may find out the exact worth when the audit comes out.

Dew-it
I might be wrong, but I believe Frank said TMM assets were one billion $ ... not just the film library. Can anyone confirm that quickly and save me a bunch of research time?
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by RNINALVNG:
MillerTIME
Member


Member Rated:
posted January 10, 2006 12:26
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
hey DOC, you know anything about this???a new CEO???

Posted by: brianinsoca
In reply to: skunksyard who wrote msg# 206620 Date:1/10/2006 11:16:23 AM
Post #of 206731

Good morning everyone. I do not post much, but do lurk.. have been with this stock for two years and change.. I called media city last night,1-818-848-5800, which is in burbank, in the thinking that this is the studio... No one was in, but did get a answering service.. asking if you do not know your party's ext., press six.. I did, and ext. for ceo, Marty Giller, is 214.. not sure what this all means.. any ideas, tia
_______________________________________

MillerTime...I called the studio and was informed that Marty Giller was the CEO of the studio before Q became involved...he is now a "tape operator"....ouch!

P.S. If I could type and cut & paste quicker I would have beaten your post...lol.

From a CEO to a "Tape Operator" hmmm....might wanna double check on that MT.
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
noah . . . you have a PM. [Smile]
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
I was partially wrong... in 9/15/05 shareholder communication on QTN website he states $2B! I only posted part of it - but its on the QTN investor page (see below) BUT during the last CC he told uas $1B

" This has allowed us to buy production studios in Burbank, California worth $25 million, a film library worth $2 billion - I’m aware it’s difficult to wrap your arms around a figure that high for our library, but the value of a library is for an indefinite amount of time and is calculated by monthly rental revenue and the high turnover each movie gets from different networks leasing them out. "


quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
Interesting...did anyone notice this sentence from the the PR"...an independent audited film library worth over several hundred million dollars." Frankie had been telling us over and over that it was worth $1B. When I think several hundered I am thinking $200-300, maybe $400M max. I guess the audit revealed it was worth less that the $1B. I guess eventually we may find out the exact worth when the audit comes out.

Dew-it
I might be wrong, but I believe Frank said TMM assets were one billion $ ... not just the film library. Can anyone confirm that quickly and save me a bunch of research time?


 
Posted by BlackWidow on :
 
Forgive me for being a Cynical, Pessimistic, Fatalist, but I just don't believe that "SAAG" was an error. IMHO he was trying to avoid commitment to conformity to GAAP.

ps Doc I also called, claimed I was trying to book a flight for the meeting, nada.

"BlackWidow
Member


posted 10 January, 2006 08:13

SAAG? Frank's tummy?

Sorry if he were ACTUALLY trying to conform to an accounting standard, it would be GAAP, Generally Accepted Accounting Procedures. I think this is another step in the Frank Olsen boogie. "
 
Posted by a4realguy on :
 
The Library has 2 different values. One is what the market is willing to pay for it, and the other is potential revenues over a given period of time. In either case I am sure Frank over valued it.

quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
I was partially wrong... in 9/15/05 shareholder communication on QTN website he states $2B! I only posted part of it - but its on the QTN investor page (see below) BUT during the last CC he told uas $1B

" This has allowed us to buy production studios in Burbank, California worth $25 million, a film library worth $2 billion - I’m aware it’s difficult to wrap your arms around a figure that high for our library, but the value of a library is for an indefinite amount of time and is calculated by monthly rental revenue and the high turnover each movie gets from different networks leasing them out. "


quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
Interesting...did anyone notice this sentence from the the PR"...an independent audited film library worth over several hundred million dollars." Frankie had been telling us over and over that it was worth $1B. When I think several hundered I am thinking $200-300, maybe $400M max. I guess the audit revealed it was worth less that the $1B. I guess eventually we may find out the exact worth when the audit comes out.

Dew-it
I might be wrong, but I believe Frank said TMM assets were one billion $ ... not just the film library. Can anyone confirm that quickly and save me a bunch of research time?



 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
We may see 3B. I dont recall any Pinkie besides CMKX with this kind of crazy volume - I know, I know (before I get slammed) but facts are facts.

vol 2.9B
5x.0002
9X.0003
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
If I recall correctly, I believe someone on Ihub board mentioned they had talked to someone at Q or with Richard...at the time the info/theory was that the film library actual valuation was the purpose for dealy in audit. Anybody recall that post??
 
Posted by a4realguy on :
 
If the Volume doesn't create a price increase, it is irrelevant. Unil the PPS goes up, it really doesn't matter how exciting the PR's are or how high the Volume is. If everything is at it appears to be with this stock, it should be in the penny range... it isn't even heading that direction.. why?
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Dew-it:
[QB] I was partially wrong... in 9/15/05 shareholder communication on QTN website he states $2B! I only posted part of it - but its on the QTN investor page (see below) BUT during the last CC he told uas $1B

" This has allowed us to buy production studios in Burbank, California worth $25 million, a film library worth $2 billion - I’m aware it’s difficult to wrap your arms around a figure that high for our library, but the value of a library is for an indefinite amount of time and is calculated by monthly rental revenue and the high turnover each movie gets from different networks leasing them out. "


For the amount of time I plan to be invested in TMM, I am satisfied with this projection. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
I would normally say it was dilution, but today is the damndest day.

We are about to trade 3 billion shares and might even close up a tick. It it were someone dumping it wouldn't have moved up at all but more than likely gone down a tic, right?

So is this a good sign, bad sign, or what?
 
Posted by a4realguy on :
 
What about Toxic Financing? If that is in place with this stock, it explains alot. The question is, does it ruin our investment.
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
PR of the QTN libaray purchase from ValCom - it states potential of only 6 figures a year of anticipated income...

Tuesday, May 24, 2005
Q Television Network Acquires Extensive Film Library

Partners with ValCom, Inc. to Purchase 143 Films


PALM SPRINGS, Calif. – May 24, 2005 – Q Television Network (Pink Sheets: QBID) announced today that it has finalized an agreement with ValCom, Inc. (OTC Bulletin Board: VACM; Frankfurt XETRA: VAM) to acquire a comprehensive video library. Q Television Network is now the exclusive distributor of the entire 143 film video library, and intends to market the videos on a worldwide basis.



Q Television anticipates the video library will bring six figures of revenue a year to the company , since the agreement gives Q Television worldwide distribution and sales rights for the library, which includes drama, comedy, romance, made-for-television, and feature films. Aside from bringing in revenue, the films will be used as a barter position to accumulate more gay and lesbian television content. With worldwide rights, Q Television will be able to barter for films distributed internationally, including Germany and Australia.



“This is a great deal for us as we are always looking for ways to increase revenue and to partner with quality entertainment companies like ValCom. In addition, we have worldwide rights to these films and will sell them in the domestic and international syndication marketplace,” said Frank Olsen, President and CEO of Q Television Network. “Our goal is to always produce quality original programming for the GLBT community, and the revenues from the sale of these films will allow us to produce new shows.”



The library was initially purchased by ValCom in August of 2002 and now Q Television has all rights to the films through this acquisition. “Frank Olsen and Q Television are positioned to be a huge success – he is going to use the revenues from this library to produce more original programming for his network,” said Vince Vellardita, Chairman and CEO of ValCom, Inc. “In my personal opinion, Frank Olsen is clearly the leader in the gay television market – his programming, ideas, marketing, and the team he has developed are way ahead of others in his field. Q Television is a home run.”
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
there it is 3B! and dumping contineus [Frown]
 
Posted by a4realguy on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
[QB] PR of the QTN libaray purchase from ValCom - it states potential of only 6 figures a year of anticipated income...

ONLY 6 Figures a Year? Hmm.. that can vary from $100,000 to $999,999. Seems the word only isn't appropriate until you know the actual numbers.
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by a4realguy:
What about Toxic Financing? If that is in place with this stock, it explains alot. The question is, does it ruin our investment.

Well toxic financing is bad because it can lead to massive dilution, the effects on the stock would be the same. And today doesn't look like dilution to me.
 
Posted by Rich735 on :
 
3.04 BIL!!!
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
I just called Q in burbank and palm springs. Frank wasn't at either. But I told people about the meeting on thursday and that we need an appt time. They said i neede to talk to rich brown. I told them its btn Frank and the shareholders. I told them to give Frank the message. Yea right.
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
true.

quote:
Originally posted by a4realguy:
quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
[QB] PR of the QTN libaray purchase from ValCom - it states potential of only 6 figures a year of anticipated income...

ONLY 6 Figures a Year? Hmm.. that can vary from $100,000 to $999,999. Seems the word only isn't appropriate until you know the actual numbers.

 
Posted by a4realguy on :
 
I could be wrong but I think this explanation of Toxic Financing says the Buy-Sell ratio can be manipulated with Pink sheet stocks. Making Sells look like buys,, etc.. making it difficult if not impossible to actually know what trend the stock is taking.

http://www.smallcapnetwork.net/archive/listserv/20051101-1.html

quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
quote:
Originally posted by a4realguy:
What about Toxic Financing? If that is in place with this stock, it explains alot. The question is, does it ruin our investment.

Well toxic financing is bad because it can lead to massive dilution, the effects on the stock would be the same. And today doesn't look like dilution to me.

 
Posted by manfromjax on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
I would normally say it was dilution, but today is the damndest day.

We are about to trade 3 billion shares and might even close up a tick. It it were someone dumping it wouldn't have moved up at all but more than likely gone down a tic, right?

So is this a good sign, bad sign, or what?

Just to early to tell. It is good that it didn't fall. We will see if there is another big dump at the close. Just don't know where all these shares are coming from.
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
Frank used this news during the CC as an excuse for dilution, saying that billions of shares were traded for the library and that they had come to maturity, because it was 2 years already. If you compare dates it was more like 6 months.

quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
PR of the QTN libaray purchase from ValCom - it states potential of only 6 figures a year of anticipated income...

Tuesday, May 24, 2005
Q Television Network Acquires Extensive Film Library

Partners with ValCom, Inc. to Purchase 143 Films


PALM SPRINGS, Calif. – May 24, 2005 – Q Television Network (Pink Sheets: QBID) announced today that it has finalized an agreement with ValCom, Inc. (OTC Bulletin Board: VACM; Frankfurt XETRA: VAM) to acquire a comprehensive video library. Q Television Network is now the exclusive distributor of the entire 143 film video library, and intends to market the videos on a worldwide basis.



Q Television anticipates the video library will bring six figures of revenue a year to the company , since the agreement gives Q Television worldwide distribution and sales rights for the library, which includes drama, comedy, romance, made-for-television, and feature films. Aside from bringing in revenue, the films will be used as a barter position to accumulate more gay and lesbian television content. With worldwide rights, Q Television will be able to barter for films distributed internationally, including Germany and Australia.



“This is a great deal for us as we are always looking for ways to increase revenue and to partner with quality entertainment companies like ValCom. In addition, we have worldwide rights to these films and will sell them in the domestic and international syndication marketplace,” said Frank Olsen, President and CEO of Q Television Network. “Our goal is to always produce quality original programming for the GLBT community, and the revenues from the sale of these films will allow us to produce new shows.”



The library was initially purchased by ValCom in August of 2002 and now Q Television has all rights to the films through this acquisition. “Frank Olsen and Q Television are positioned to be a huge success – he is going to use the revenues from this library to produce more original programming for his network,” said Vince Vellardita, Chairman and CEO of ValCom, Inc. “In my personal opinion, Frank Olsen is clearly the leader in the gay television market – his programming, ideas, marketing, and the team he has developed are way ahead of others in his field. Q Television is a home run.”


 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Esteban99:
Is Ameritrade bugged? Anyone else seeing 0 volume?

Yeah Ameritrade shows 0 volume for me too...

Hmmm...

Also, using delayed quotes (I dont have Level 2s, yet)...I'm seeing-->

Yahoo--> Volume: 2,929,715,677

Marketwatch--> Volume: 2,144,168,062
 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
Dew-It -

That's only 143 films, that is NOT Q's entire library [Razz]
 
Posted by 4Tune4Me on :
 
I've got Ameritrade..showing 3,048,876,676
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
I wonder if this could be a fraudulent statement, they should have been sure before saying this, because in the CC Frank said that he didn't get the music rights to the films. But this PR says they have all rights.
Its hard to let Frank be accurate or honest about anything. Seems like any idiot can see thru the bull.


The library was initially purchased by ValCom in August of 2002 and now Q Television has all rights to the films through this acquisition. “Frank Olsen and Q Television are positioned to be a huge success – he is going to use the revenues from this library to produce more original programming for his network,” said Vince Vellardita, Chairman and CEO of ValCom, Inc. “In my personal opinion, Frank Olsen is clearly the leader in the gay television market – his programming, ideas, marketing, and the team he has developed are way ahead of others in his field. Q Television is a home run.”
 
Posted by manfromjax on :
 
My Ameritrade works..

Gee, I am tempted to buy a few hundred shares near the close at .0004 just so it will look good. It would only cost a couple of bucks.
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by redelmo19:
No seriously , q bid is a waste of money

Hey, want to go clubbin' in Montreal?
 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
If you put in a trade for .0004, it will attempt to buy from the .0003 pool first (which it will do successfully).
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
Hey maybe you'll get the ones that i'm selling.
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by manfromjax:
My Ameritrade works..

Gee, I am tempted to buy a few hundred shares near the close at .0004 just so it will look good. It would only cost a couple of bucks.

jax
Good theory but the process doesn't work that way. A bid of .0004 (or $1.00 for that matter) would go through at the lowest asking price, which appears to be .0003 right now.

However, I believe the MMs can make odd price trades and often do to "paint the tape" and make it appear that extremely high or low trades are taking place. But I'm no expert on this so don't quote me ...
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
QBID'n PM...
 
Posted by qlooz on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
So how long before the bashers jump on the new thread name? LOL

Go Q!

-----------------------------------------------

I might change my name to QWIN

.
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
point taken. We are both speculating now... are'nt we? [Wink] I am just going by the info we have at hand, which are the PRs and Frankie boy's CC and shareholder info. We need an audit don't we?

quote:
Originally posted by Esteban99:
Dew-It -

That's only 143 films, that is NOT Q's entire library [Razz]


 
Posted by qlooz on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by manfromjax:
My Ameritrade works..

Gee, I am tempted to buy a few hundred shares near the close at .0004 just so it will look good. It would only cost a couple of bucks.

jax
Good theory but the process doesn't work that way. A bid of .0004 (or $1.00 for that matter) would go through at the lowest asking price, which appears to be .0003 right now.
-------------------------------------------------


hmmm my purchase of 500000 shares at .0002 went through no problem earlier today.
However, I believe the MMs can make odd price trades and often do to "paint the tape" and make it appear that extremely high or low trades are taking place. But I'm no expert on this so don't quote me ...


 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
point taken. We are both speculating now... are'nt we? [Wink] I am just going by the info we have at hand, which are the PRs and Frankie boy's CC and shareholder info. We need an audit don't we?

From Frank's 9/15 PR:
"Now, our library has over 2000 films that again, will continuously generate these dollar amounts for many, many years."
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
3.05 billion...
 
Posted by qlooz on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by qlooz:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Bottomliner:
[qb] [QUOTE]Originally posted by manfromjax:
[qb] My Ameritrade works..

Gee, I am tempted to buy a few hundred shares near the close at .0004 just so it will look good. It would only cost a couple of bucks.

jax
Good theory but the process doesn't work that way. A bid of .0004 (or $1.00 for that matter) would go through at the lowest asking price, which appears to be .0003 right now.


-------------------------------------------------

try this again
bought 500000 at .0002 no problem
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
closing level IIs.

.0002x.0003
4x9
 
Posted by manfromjax on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by manfromjax:
My Ameritrade works..

Gee, I am tempted to buy a few hundred shares near the close at .0004 just so it will look good. It would only cost a couple of bucks.

jax
Good theory but the process doesn't work that way. A bid of .0004 (or $1.00 for that matter) would go through at the lowest asking price, which appears to be .0003 right now.

However, I believe the MMs can make odd price trades and often do to "paint the tape" and make it appear that extremely high or low trades are taking place. But I'm no expert on this so don't quote me ...

Yea, I knew that.. just a thought. But the good thing is that there didn't seem to be any dump at.0002 at the close as there has been the past few days... At least as I type. I do see some .0002 beginning to show up after hours. In fact here come a bunch right now... [Mad]
 
Posted by Ad astra on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
PR of the QTN libaray purchase from ValCom - it states potential of only 6 figures a year of anticipated income...

Tuesday, May 24, 2005
Q Television Network Acquires Extensive Film Library

Partners with ValCom, Inc. to Purchase 143 Films

-------------

Forget toxic financing as a reason for share price drop...I wonder if frank financed these types of purchases with stock? I read the lawsuit a few weeks back and it seems he has done this before.

IMO nothing terribly wrong with it, provided we finally see how much the film libarary is really worth.
PALM SPRINGS, Calif. – May 24, 2005 – Q Television Network (Pink Sheets: QBID) announced today that it has finalized an agreement with ValCom, Inc. (OTC Bulletin Board: VACM; Frankfurt XETRA: VAM) to acquire a comprehensive video library. Q Television Network is now the exclusive distributor of the entire 143 film video library, and intends to market the videos on a worldwide basis.



Q Television anticipates the video library will bring six figures of revenue a year to the company , since the agreement gives Q Television worldwide distribution and sales rights for the library, which includes drama, comedy, romance, made-for-television, and feature films. Aside from bringing in revenue, the films will be used as a barter position to accumulate more gay and lesbian television content. With worldwide rights, Q Television will be able to barter for films distributed internationally, including Germany and Australia.



“This is a great deal for us as we are always looking for ways to increase revenue and to partner with quality entertainment companies like ValCom. In addition, we have worldwide rights to these films and will sell them in the domestic and international syndication marketplace,” said Frank Olsen, President and CEO of Q Television Network. “Our goal is to always produce quality original programming for the GLBT community, and the revenues from the sale of these films will allow us to produce new shows.”



The library was initially purchased by ValCom in August of 2002 and now Q Television has all rights to the films through this acquisition. “Frank Olsen and Q Television are positioned to be a huge success – he is going to use the revenues from this library to produce more original programming for his network,” said Vince Vellardita, Chairman and CEO of ValCom, Inc. “In my personal opinion, Frank Olsen is clearly the leader in the gay television market – his programming, ideas, marketing, and the team he has developed are way ahead of others in his field. Q Television is a home run.”


 
Posted by Peaser01 on :
 
WOW, getting pretty close to 3.5+ Billion in volume.
 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
I'm pretty sure now the plan was to release a bunch of investor PRs while gradually dumping shares throughout the day to match the created demand.

It's annoying because the numbers are still there to make this profitable, but we seem to be at the mercy of Frank and hope that he stops feeling the need to dilute to raise funds.
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
You are right. So Franki boy says the film collecton is over 2000 and will bring 400K year X 5 years = $2B. Is that where he came up that number? I guess the question is what is the entire (X)collection worth? Today's PR says several million is it 100,000 to 999,999 as 4realguy stated? I guess the question remains - is it the low or high side of several $million. We need the audit I guess.

"Now, our library has over 2000 films that again, will continuously generate these dollar amounts for many, many years. It has allowed us to do 1,000 hours of original programming which bring in $400,000 per year over the next 10 years and has bought us the rights to the Gay Games."


quote:
Originally posted by Esteban99:
quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
point taken. We are both speculating now... are'nt we? [Wink] I am just going by the info we have at hand, which are the PRs and Frankie boy's CC and shareholder info. We need an audit don't we?

From Frank's 9/15 PR:
"Now, our library has over 2000 films that again, will continuously generate these dollar amounts for many, many years."


 
Posted by 4Tune4Me on :
 
Last Sale is still adding in shares at 7 minutes after the hour....
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
current vol 3.75B - for the most part the trades are buys at .0002.
 
Posted by a4realguy on :
 
Hey.. everyone excited about the billions traded.. you aren't looking at the proper indicator.. after all that PR and all those shares traded, it's still .0003. Hasn't seen .0005 in WEEKS... hasn't Seen .0007 in Months... If that's something to be excited about, I have some ocean front property in the desert to sell you.
 
Posted by Peaser01 on :
 
Might just see 4 Billion today. 3.7 so far.
 
Posted by manfromjax on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by 4Tune4Me:
Last Sale is still adding in shares at 7 minutes after the hour....

At least these are in 7 million lots verses 9 million lots as is in the past! That is a Good sign??
 
Posted by qlooz on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by a4realguy:
Hey.. everyone excited about the billions traded.. you aren't looking at the proper indicator.. after all that PR and all those shares traded, it's still .0003. Hasn't seen .0005 in WEEKS... hasn't Seen .0007 in Months... If that's something to be excited about, I have some ocean front property in the desert to sell you.

-------------

I'll buy your property... I bought qbid might as well.
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by a4realguy:
Hey.. everyone excited about the billions traded.. you aren't looking at the proper indicator.. after all that PR and all those shares traded, it's still .0003. Hasn't seen .0005 in WEEKS... hasn't Seen .0007 in Months... If that's something to be excited about, I have some ocean front property in the desert to sell you.

I wouldn't say we are excited, just amazed. That is a lot of freakin activity!
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
I am out of money, otherwise I would the first sucker to buy some property from ya 4real. LOL!

quote:
Originally posted by a4realguy:
Hey.. everyone excited about the billions traded.. you aren't looking at the proper indicator.. after all that PR and all those shares traded, it's still .0003. Hasn't seen .0005 in WEEKS... hasn't Seen .0007 in Months... If that's something to be excited about, I have some ocean front property in the desert to sell you.


 
Posted by 4Tune4Me on :
 
The 7 million lots came AFTER the 9 million lots. Wild share counts are not exciting in a positive way.
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
Actually, this IS the most excitment we have had here since Richard Brown was on RB going after Fistula for posting "false" posts.
 
Posted by a4realguy on :
 
Well don't fret.. seems like there is a line forming already.. maybe you can visit some of these posters Ocean Front property soon.. (smile)


quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
I am out of money, otherwise I would the first sucker to buy some property from ya 4real. LOL!

quote:
Originally posted by a4realguy:
Hey.. everyone excited about the billions traded.. you aren't looking at the proper indicator.. after all that PR and all those shares traded, it's still .0003. Hasn't seen .0005 in WEEKS... hasn't Seen .0007 in Months... If that's something to be excited about, I have some ocean front property in the desert to sell you.



 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
looks like around $1 mill changed hands in the Q today.
 
Posted by BJ on :
 
can someone post the article about Q from http://news.ft.com/home/us , I'm not a subscriber and I dont really want to put my credit card in just for a free trial to read the article...

thanks!!!
 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
As much as everyone is surprised the PPS didn't move... we still only traded 4% of the A/S today.
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
Yahoo just dropped 1.5 billion off of the volume...its at 2.2 right now

What the hell?
 
Posted by 4Tune4Me on :
 
I bought back in today - 1.5 million *.0002.
 
Posted by kaos on :
 
just out of curiosity...has anyone over the past few weeks gotten a fill at .0001 ????
 
Posted by kaos on :
 
Volume
3,751,719,175 Heavy
819.6M 10 Day Average
0.0 Shares Out.
td waterhouse
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by BJ:
can someone post the article about Q from http://news.ft.com/home/us , I'm not a subscriber and I dont really want to put my credit card in just for a free trial to read the article...

thanks!!!

It is on the investors page at qtelevision.com
 
Posted by Marty on :
 
That would probably never happen unless the ask dropped to .0001, and the MM's are trading in the fifth digit. Here's a good explaination of how it works:
http://tinyurl.com/4lvgg

GL....
quote:
Originally posted by kaos:
just out of curiosity...has anyone over the past few weeks gotten a fill at .0001 ????


 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by redelmo19:
QBID IS BULL****

Thanks, redelmo. Appreciate your well-researched DD. You've obviously spent considerable time reaching this conclusion. I especially like your use of extraordinarily technical terms, like BULL****. Most stock analysts do not understand the "BULL****" theory well enough to use it effectively. I've been analyzing all your extensive facts and figures for most of the day and finally have an answer:

"IS NOT!" [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Wangdo on :
 
You crack me up BL
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by redelmo19:
QBID IS BULL****

Thanks, redelmo. Appreciate your well-researched DD. You've obviously spent considerable time reaching this conclusion. I especially like your use of extraordinarily technical terms, like BULL****. Most stock analysts do not understand the "BULL****" theory well enough to use it effectively. I've been analyzing all your extensive facts and figures for most of the day and finally have an answer:

"IS NOT!" [Big Grin]


 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by redelmo19:
QBID IS BULL****

Thanks, redelmo. Appreciate your well-researched DD. You've obviously spent considerable time reaching this conclusion. I especially like your use of extraordinarily technical terms, like BULL****. Most stock analysts do not understand the "BULL****" theory well enough to use it effectively. I've been analyzing all your extensive facts and figures for most of the day and finally have an answer:

"IS NOT!" [Big Grin]

Hey what do you expect from a little red monster that keeps making up songs consisting of one word repeated to the tune of jingle bells over and over? [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Wangdo:
You crack me up BL

Just trying to acknowledge redelmo's contribution to the board. Who knows . . . he may have insider information!!! [Big Grin]
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
so do we have a accurate share volume for today.im pretty sure today is the biggest volume day ever on qbid.

anyone watching the level 2's i would be interested in seeing the after hours buys and sells. tia.

sincerely your qbidiot.

tommorrow is another day for most of us count your blessings that you even had the funds to speculate on this high risk/reward investment.

some of us actually borrowed funds to take this play with interest i might add. so be patient do your dd and sit back and watch this unfold.

hey whizknock you backing up the truck yet. or still po'd about how this panned out?

26 million long and strong.

today feels like an apple cheesecake day with some caramel topping hehehe.

im all in folks be happy those that are just buying in that your inpoint is not over .001 like many of ours is. thank you all for tolerating my obnoxiously positive attitude.
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
INTERESTING DAY . . . do we all agree on that?
 
Posted by Jennifercd10 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Wangdo:
You crack me up BL
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by redelmo19:
QBID IS BULL****

Thanks, redelmo. Appreciate your well-researched DD. You've obviously spent considerable time reaching this conclusion. I especially like your use of extraordinarily technical terms, like BULL****. Most stock analysts do not understand the "BULL****" theory well enough to use it effectively. I've been analyzing all your extensive facts and figures for most of the day and finally have an answer:

"IS NOT!"


redelmo19… I’ve put you on the cheesecake list and I’ll send you yours made with your special ingredient… “Bull****”. [Big Grin]



 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
It took you all day to come up with that come back??? getting slow in your old age man [Big Grin]

quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by redelmo19:
QBID IS BULL****

Thanks, redelmo. Appreciate your well-researched DD. You've obviously spent considerable time reaching this conclusion. I especially like your use of extraordinarily technical terms, like BULL****. Most stock analysts do not understand the "BULL****" theory well enough to use it effectively. I've been analyzing all your extensive facts and figures for most of the day and finally have an answer:

"IS NOT!" [Big Grin]


 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
LOL Yep.
 
Posted by Jennifercd10 on :
 
redelmo19… I’ve put you on the cheesecake list and I’ll send you yours made with your special ingredient… “Bull****”.
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
It took you all day to come up with that come back??? getting slow in your old age man [Big Grin]

MM
Give me a break, guy. I spent most of my time analyzing his data ... had to consider all possibilities ... had to make some really tough calls on what he was "really" saying ... had to drink 3 or 4 Scotches and take two naps ... this is tough work ... a lot harder than it seems ... and also I'm a lot older and slower than you are ... and most of my functions don't function the way they used to function ... and what I used to do all night now takes me all night to do ... so cut me some slack. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Doctoall on :
 
Thanks for the calls [Big Grin] "Q" was very busy this morning. Sounds like they had a "bad switchboard" day.
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jennifercd10:
redelmo19… I’ve put you on the cheesecake list and I’ll send you yours made with your special ingredient… “Bull****”.

Sounds yummy ... wonder if mjm can eat four of them. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 

 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by Jennifercd10:
redelmo19… I’ve put you on the cheesecake list and I’ll send you yours made with your special ingredient… “Bull****”.

Sounds yummy ... wonder if mjm can eat four of them. [Big Grin]
Uhhh, is this turning into an episode of "Fear Factor"
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
It took you all day to come up with that come back??? getting slow in your old age man [Big Grin]

quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by redelmo19:
QBID IS BULL****

Thanks, redelmo. Appreciate your well-researched DD. You've obviously spent considerable time reaching this conclusion. I especially like your use of extraordinarily technical terms, like BULL****. Most stock analysts do not understand the "BULL****" theory well enough to use it effectively. I've been analyzing all your extensive facts and figures for most of the day and finally have an answer:

"IS NOT!" [Big Grin]


An analytical mind takes a lot of time. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
Time Warner Brings QTN to Nebraska
1/10/2006 5:24:00 PM

Time Warner Cable has launched Q Television Network on its Nebraska system, which serves the Lincoln area and the seven colleges and universities in the marketplace, the network announced Tuesday.

The MSO’s Lincoln-area subscribers with digital-cable set-tops can sign up for the gay- and lesbian-targeted network as a full-time service for $7.95 per month.

“Time Warner Cable is committed to serving the needs and interests of our customers, and Q Television is an ideal partner for reaching out to and including the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender members of our community through innovative and original programming that speaks to their lifestyle and concerns,” Time Warner Cable Nebraska division president Beth Scarborough said in a prepared statement.

QTN vice president of affiliate sales and marketing Carol Hinnant added, “Lincoln, as one of the fastest-growing non-Sun Belt cities in the United States and one of the fastest-growing metro areas in the Midwestern region, is a welcome extension of Q's reach.”
 
Posted by bige2533 on :
 
Is Richard Brown involved in the meeting on Thursday?

quote:
Originally posted by Doctoall:
Thanks for the calls [Big Grin] "Q" was very busy this morning. Sounds like they had a "bad switchboard" day.


 
Posted by mydream1 on :
 
Every PR.We got more dumping.PPS no move. [Frown]
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mydream1:
Every PR.We got more dumping.PPS no move. [Frown]

hahahahahaahaha... just read that last sentence
 
Posted by BJ on :
 
Hoss trader, thanks for the above reply.......


This may sound like a dumb question, but here it goes.....

When or if they really do send out a DVD,
How does Q get shareholders addresses? When we buy shares threw , lets say Etrade, does Q get a copy of our mailing address and shares owned from the broker???


1/9/2006 - DVD Release

Shareholders,

The DVD for Triangle Multi-Media shareholders will begin being shipped to shareholders next week.
[Smile] [Smile]
 
Posted by laintbad on :
 
Today is a total bummer. Nothing can make this stock go up unless Frank comes up with atleast 100,000 subs.

I have kissed goodbye to my money on this POS.

Thanks Frank!
 
Posted by hypnostock on :
 
If Frank was dumping shares the past few weeks, wouldn't he have put out the P.R. about ownership before dumping? To atleast try to drive the shareprice up. What is his timing strategy with these PR's? Is it possible he's been buying back somehow, hence the large volume over the past weeks?

faithfully OP.
 
Posted by Ligge on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by BJ:
Hoss trader, thanks for the above reply.......


This may sound like a dumb question, but here it goes.....

When or if they really do send out a DVD,
How does Q get shareholders addresses? When we buy shares threw , lets say Etrade, does Q get a copy of our mailing address and shares owned from the broker???


1/9/2006 - DVD Release

Shareholders,

The DVD for Triangle Multi-Media shareholders will begin being shipped to shareholders next week.
[Smile] [Smile]

You sign up for it on the investor page. Or email Richard Brown (also on that page) and ask for a copy. He has a list of who it needs to be sent to. You will need to tell him where to send it.
 
Posted by 4Tune4Me on :
 
We had 881.9 million shares transacted after 4pm today. Holy smokes....
 
Posted by Marty on :
 
With 100bill A/S and an O/S of ???....also an unknown float at this point...the market will not sustain a significant rise in the PPS....it can't at this level....there are way too many shares to be traded....even if the audit comes out and shows a 100mill value of the company, that would still equate to around .001 PPS....but the trading interest won't be there....that's way too many shares....(stranger things have happened though, for the optimistic)...obviously, I'm still watchin' this thing, in case a miracle happens......LOL....JMHO..GLTA..take it or leave it.....
quote:
Originally posted by laintbad:
Today is a total bummer. Nothing can make this stock go up unless Frank comes up with atleast 100,000 subs.

I have kissed goodbye to my money on this POS.

Thanks Frank!


 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
OH MY GOD this is hillarious

keep em coming lol


quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
Ode to our Transparency Seekers

 -  -


 
Posted by Bigrod40 on :
 
[Big Grin] Frank sure has deep pockets, he sure sponsors alot.


http://queerloungeonline.com/content/view/21/44/
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by BJ:
Hoss trader, thanks for the above reply.......


This may sound like a dumb question, but here it goes.....

When or if they really do send out a DVD,
How does Q get shareholders addresses? When we buy shares threw , lets say Etrade, does Q get a copy of our mailing address and shares owned from the broker???


1/9/2006 - DVD Release

Shareholders,

The DVD for Triangle Multi-Media shareholders will begin being shipped to shareholders next week.
[Smile] [Smile]

You have to request it through Richard...
 
Posted by Bigrod40 on :
 
Made the front page!!
http://www.planetout.com/
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
Well Doc looks great but ive looked better.LOL
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
Well Doc looks great but ive looked better.LOL

imak
We judge people on their actions, not their looks. You are a winner ... now go to Burbank and win one for all us "Gippers" (a little old movie trivia, for anyone who cares). [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
I must be blind i cant find it lol


quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
WOW. Just incase nobody looked. That story on QTN in the financial times is on the front page of the website!

http://news.ft.com/home/us

Right beside the story of GOOGLE

Dam. That is pretty huge. Talk about exposure

 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by hypnostock:
If Frank was dumping shares the past few weeks, wouldn't he have put out the P.R. about ownership before dumping? To atleast try to drive the shareprice up. What is his timing strategy with these PR's? Is it possible he's been buying back somehow, hence the large volume over the past weeks? faithfully OP.

hypno
Maybe so ... your positive speculations are certainly as valid as the negative speculations we've been exposed to the last few weeks.

But the most important point is that none of us can know what's going on until Frank reveals a few Q secrets. And that might be only a few days away. I'm all tingly with excitement ... LOL.

GL to us all. Tomorrow should be another interesting day.
 
Posted by Bobbyd on :
 
Since, according to today's PR, we have assets of "hundreds" of millions, why don't Frank sell or mortgage "tens" of millions of assets, to by back the float and retire all of us?
 
Posted by Bigrod40 on :
 
[Smile] Maybe Frank is buying back shares and knowing the boys are coming for a visit "VERY SOON" , he should buy back as many billions as possible before "the visit".
Boy would it be something if this is what has been happening all along, alot of people would be eating crow, myself included.
Who knows maybe all his "behind closed door friends" that stated last year they will buy all they can for under a .01 are now coming through for Frankie Boy.

[Roll Eyes] [Roll Eyes] Sorry, Im dreaming again......
 
Posted by forfun on :
 
Or maybe Frank and Urban are best friends and share notes!
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Bigrod40:
[Smile] Maybe Frank is buying back shares ... Sorry, Im dreaming again ...

Bigrod
Nothing wrong with dreaming:

"To accomplish great things, we must dream as well as act." Anatole France (1844 - 1924)

"You see things; and you say, 'Why?' But I dream things that never were; and I say, "Why not?" George Bernard Shaw (1856 - 1950)

"There is nothing like dream to create the future. Utopia to-day, flesh and blood tomorrow."
Victor Hugo (1802 - 1885), Les Miserables

"What if nothing exists and we're all in somebody's dream? Or what's worse, what if only that fat guy in the third row exists?" Woody Allen (1935 - ) ... WOW, IT MIGHT BE FRANK!! [Big Grin]

GL to us all. Tomorrow should be another interesting day.
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
if indeed a buyback is in the works then like i said prior when we get to ten cents a share im going to run naked through the streets hahaha. please dear franky give us some hope.i still have faith in you.

26 million on lockdown.
 
Posted by bige2533 on :
 
Perhaps there are already loans against those assets? Plus, QTN doesn't have a positive cash flow and may not for a while.

quote:
Originally posted by Bobbyd:
Since, according to today's PR, we have assets of "hundreds" of millions, why don't Frank sell or mortgage "tens" of millions of assets, to by back the float and retire all of us?


 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
These people can be assured that the appropriate action will happen if the meeting is not honoured.

Doc is well informed and has the letters written in case this falls through.

Please be advised , Doc is a professional person and he knows what has to be dont to do this right.

I have every confidence in him, and what he and Imakemoney are doing.

They appreciate all the advice, and im sure can not answer all the pms they are getting.

if you have a message into them and they have not answered, its not because they are ignoring you, they are completely swamped with pms, and I know for a fact that Doc does not have his DSL at his new office till I believe he stated Jan 20th.

He is running a full time office with patience coming and going all day long, and believe me he is juggling a lot of stuff to make all the efforts that he is making in this attempt to bring Transparency to this stock.

Please all respect the work they are doing and refrain from pming them looking for more info.


they are showing great respect, and are conducting themselves in a professional manner.

they will fill us in on everything can, as soon as they can.

just because they dont give us the answers we want to hear, does not mean they are on the take, or holding back info, or being rude. They are not going to release any info that they can not verify, so let them get thier meeting, and we can go from there.

All thanks go to you You Doc and Imakemoney.

Good luck with keeping them to a meeting on Thursday.

Today is proof that they pressure is getting to Frank and that we can force the issue if we work together.

Rod

quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
Posted by: Sputnik
In reply to: chevdawg18 who wrote msg# 206731 Date:1/10/2006 12:29:02 PM
Post #of 206736

Someone needs to tell Doctoall and the other fellow to send the communication to the Sec. of State in Washington that TMM is in violation of the State of Washington's law concerning opening their financials. Frank, Rene and Richard will just ignore phone calls to them. If you can please post this where these fellas post. Thanks


 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
RIGHT [Big Grin]

quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by noah129:
bottomliner dont you have to consult me before we lose club members

noah
Just helping out ... I know you're a busy guy.

Check the posts today and I think you'll agree with my decision. Man, some people are changing their opinions about Q with every post. I guess they believe that making 180-degree turns every hour gives them a better chance of being right someday ... [Big Grin]

By the way, Rod volunteered to be parking garage monitor ... and I just couldn't say no to him. But the final decision is yours ... Rod will understand, no matter what you decide.

Right, Rod?


 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
this is not very Canadian of you Im embarrassed by your behavior.


quote:
Originally posted by redelmo19:
Get out of Q now!


 
Posted by mydream1 on :
 
I don't think it is buyback.If buyback,who sold these 3.8 Billion.This is a huge dump.
 
Posted by mydream1 on :
 
But,I really hope this is a buyback.then I can win money back. [Frown]
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
man this last couple of days I have read some of the most humorous post in a long time..

this is another well thought out bit of humour and i wanted to say I truly appreciate it

thanks Bottomliner you made my day lol


quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by redelmo19:
QBID IS BULL****

Thanks, redelmo. Appreciate your well-researched DD. You've obviously spent considerable time reaching this conclusion. I especially like your use of extraordinarily technical terms, like BULL****. Most stock analysts do not understand the "BULL****" theory well enough to use it effectively. I've been analyzing all your extensive facts and figures for most of the day and finally have an answer:

"IS NOT!" [Big Grin]


 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
make sure you send it to the parking garage, and ill make sure that it gets servered where he will be sitting, between the dumpsters and the leaking portapotty.
[Big Grin] [Eek!]


quote:
Originally posted by Jennifercd10:
redelmo19… I’ve put you on the cheesecake list and I’ll send you yours made with your special ingredient… “Bull****”.


 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
make sure you send it to the parking garage, and ill make sure that it gets servered where he will be sitting, between the dumpsters and the leaking portapotty.
[Big Grin] [Eek!]


quote:
Originally posted by Jennifercd10:
redelmo19… I’ve put you on the cheesecake list and I’ll send you yours made with your special ingredient… “Bull****”.


 
Posted by BJ on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
quote:
Originally posted by BJ:


When or if they really do send out a DVD,
How does Q get shareholders addresses? When we buy shares threw , lets say Etrade, does Q get a copy of our mailing address and shares owned from the broker???

[Smile] [Smile]

You have to request it through Richard...
Ligge & mjm2005

perfect, thanks,
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
What are you thanking Frank for, you are the one that gave up on your money.

Frank stated this is a long term stock.

im in till the end or till im rich, i have decided to give Frank the benefit of the doubt.

every day there are more and more of his promises coming true.

the DVD is yet another of the many. the thing to remember is Frank is consistent.

always late, but he delivers. im giving him time, he promised to make me rich, i can wait.

Rod

quote:
Originally posted by laintbad:
Today is a total bummer. Nothing can make this stock go up unless Frank comes up with atleast 100,000 subs.

I have kissed goodbye to my money on this POS.

Thanks Frank!


 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
that was one of the charicters Ronald Regan played in a football movie years ago. but im not sure if that was the origin lol

Rod

quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
Well Doc looks great but ive looked better.LOL

imak
We judge people on their actions, not their looks. You are a winner ... now go to Burbank and win one for all us "Gippers" (a little old movie trivia, for anyone who cares). [Big Grin]


 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
well if nothing else you may have just given Frank a new motivation. Im sure he would love to see a young man such as yourself running naked anywhere lol

you are a wise one. lol

Rod

quote:
Originally posted by noah129:
if indeed a buyback is in the works then like i said prior when we get to ten cents a share im going to run naked through the streets hahaha. please dear franky give us some hope.i still have faith in you.

26 million on lockdown.


 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
Does anybody know if Doc and imak got an appointment time for the meeting yet?
 
Posted by one2watchny on :
 
Tonight I went for a haircut, I've been telling him to throw a few bucks into qbid for a few months now,
He finally did.......but bought thru his broker.
His broker had already been trading Q.
If my barbers broker knows about Q.....this must be almost a household name.
Anyone else have a live broker that knows about it.
Anyone have a clue to how many stockholders there may be?
This could easily have a 20 bil. trading day when the audit comes out IMHO. Nuf said.
SWEET Dreams!
[Wink]
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
You've got a purdy smile tho [Big Grin]

quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
Well Doc looks great but ive looked better.LOL


 
Posted by suzainiee on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by manfromjax:
My Ameritrade works..

Gee, I am tempted to buy a few hundred shares near the close at .0004 just so it will look good. It would only cost a couple of bucks.

jax
Good theory but the process doesn't work that way. A bid of .0004 (or $1.00 for that matter) would go through at the lowest asking price, which appears to be .0003 right now.

However, I believe the MMs can make odd price trades and often do to "paint the tape" and make it appear that extremely high or low trades are taking place. But I'm no expert on this so don't quote me ...

That is the way it is SUPPOSE to work.....Pinks???
 
Posted by redelmo19 on :
 
Qbid is the best stock ever made.
 
Posted by manfromjax on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by suzainiee:
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by manfromjax:
My Ameritrade works..

Gee, I am tempted to buy a few hundred shares near the close at .0004 just so it will look good. It would only cost a couple of bucks.

jax
Good theory but the process doesn't work that way. A bid of .0004 (or $1.00 for that matter) would go through at the lowest asking price, which appears to be .0003 right now.

However, I believe the MMs can make odd price trades and often do to "paint the tape" and make it appear that extremely high or low trades are taking place. But I'm no expert on this so don't quote me ...

That is the way it is SUPPOSE to work.....Pinks???
Yes, that is how it is suppose to work. I know from past experience that when I have 'accidently' put in a higher Bid price then the current Ask price, I got the shares at the current Ask. At least Ameritrade does this for me. So, if I was to accidently bid .002 verses .0002, I would make the buy at .0002, unless the pps was going up, then I could possible pay more. But there have been time when we see the pps spike up way above the Ask on the chart..so I wonder sometimes.
 
Posted by manfromjax on :
 
Wont it be nice when the day comes we can go here QBID and see something?
 
Posted by manfromjax on :
 
One more thing before i go back to work.

As I said before, I don't like pushing a stock.. but in this case I will. Please look at ELN . I have been in it for over 3 years and have ridden it up and down. It has been one hell of a roller coaster ride. The ride is going to be straight up for the next few months. They have a great drug for MS that was pulled temporarily (because of Vioxx scare and other things) but is coming back soon (March). And they have a great Nano drug delievery system that is getting better.

I know that we QBID investors have been through some tuff times owning QBID, but I have been through a tuffer time owning ELN..believe me. So, I am telling you of a great chance to make a GOOD return on your money.

But as always, this is just my opinion, do you own DD. I am just throwing this out there for a chance to make some money while we wait for QBID to go somewhere. Of course I have bought as low as $1.35 a few years ago. But it is like QBID...you got to believe in it!
 
Posted by 4Tune4Me on :
 
Levity from Wikipedia (edited for length)

George "The Gipper" Gipp (February 18, 1895 – December 14, 1920) was a famous college football player who played for the University of Notre Dame.


Gipp died 14 December, 1920, two weeks before being elected Notre Dame's first All-American by Walter Camp. The apocryphal story of Gipp's death begins when he returned from a night out to Notre Dame's campus after curfew. Unable to gain entrance to his residence, Gipp went to the rear door of Washington Hall, the campus' theatre building. Gipp was a steward for the building, and knew that the rear door was often unlocked. Gipp usually spent such nights in the hall. On that night, however, the door was locked, and Gipp was forced to sleep outside. By the morning he had contracted pneumonia, and eventually died from a related infection.

It was on his hospital bed that he delivered the famous, but possibly fictional, "win just one for the Gipper" line. The full quotation from which the line is derived is:

I've got to go, Rock (Knute Rockne). It's all right. I'm not afraid. Some time, Rock, when the team is up against it, when things are wrong and the breaks are beating the boys, tell them to go in there with all they've got and win just one for the Gipper. I don't know where I'll be then, Rock. But I'll know about it, and I'll be happy.
 
Posted by Bigrod40 on :
 
[Cool] INTERESTING INDEED

Wednesday, 11 January 2006
Q Television Becomes a Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Triangle Multi-Media
LOS ANGELES, CA, (NAMC) – On Tuesday the 24/7 premium television network geared towards the gay community, Q Television (PINK SHEETS: QBID) , made an announcement that the company will be accounted for as a wholly owned subsidiary of Triangle Mutli-Media.


According to the release Triangle Multi-Media will own 100% of Q Televisions asset base, even though the company operated as an independent entity since it’s inception.


Triangle Multi-Media and Q Television Network CEO Frank Olsen said "Up to thirty percent of QTN may be used for future financing and debt. With the accelerated growth of QTN, management felt it was time to formally announce this to QBID shareholders.”


This is why investing in a reporting company is essential for investors, when a company is not required to report investors are in the dark until they are allowed to see light.


In this case investors in Q Television lose their value but when a stock is trading at .0002 what should they expect.


Usually we would not report on stocks that trade on the Pink Sheets, but this just caught my attention.


David Kingston
Los Angeles News Correspondent
NAMC Newswire
www.namcnewswire.com
 
Posted by Ad astra on :
 
I am confused about a fear of a reverse split. If the value of the company can be confirmed by an independent audit...then what does it matter if there are 1 million shares or 100 billion?

If you want to buy a pack of Bubblegum and you have 100 pennies in your left pant pocket or a single dollar in your right pant pocket, either could be used to purchase the pack of Bubblegum, correct? Both have the same value.

And I have seen a number of companies successfully pull off the Reverse Split (JDSU recently).

I also like that TMM is getting The Q under GAAP accounting principles...it sounds like there may be an effort underway to make this a reporting company.

And if were a true effort to get to an exchange (NASD or AMEX), I'd gladly take a 5,000/1 reverse split to do it.
 
Posted by BROOKLYN'S FINEST on :
 
WOW
 
Posted by moneypenny on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ad astra:
I am confused about a fear of a reverse split. If the value of the company can be confirmed by an independent audit...then what does it matter if there are 1 million shares or 100 billion?

If you want to buy a pack of Bubblegum and you have 100 pennies in your left pant pocket or a single dollar in your right pant pocket, either could be used to purchase the pack of Bubblegum, correct? Both have the same value.

And I have seen a number of companies successfully pull off the Reverse Split (JDSU recently).

I also like that TMM is getting The Q under GAAP accounting principles...it sounds like there may be an effort underway to make this a reporting company.

And if were a true effort to get to an exchange (NASD or AMEX), I'd gladly take a 5,000/1 reverse split to do it.

A 5000/1 split with a price of .01 would make my million shares of Q worth a whopping $2 .
 
Posted by GatorMan on :
 
At the time of the split, yes, the value and percent you own remain unchanged. Where the real problem comes in is if the authorized shares are not reversed at the same time (and this is not automatic). If there are 100B authorized and 100B outstanding and there is a 1 for 100 reverse split then there are now 1B outstanding and still 100B authorized. The company has just gone from not being able to sell more stock to now being able to sell 99B more shares. And guess what that does to your percent ownership.

quote:
Originally posted by Ad astra:
I am confused about a fear of a reverse split. If the value of the company can be confirmed by an independent audit...then what does it matter if there are 1 million shares or 100 billion?

If you want to buy a pack of Bubblegum and you have 100 pennies in your left pant pocket or a single dollar in your right pant pocket, either could be used to purchase the pack of Bubblegum, correct? Both have the same value.

And I have seen a number of companies successfully pull off the Reverse Split (JDSU recently).

I also like that TMM is getting The Q under GAAP accounting principles...it sounds like there may be an effort underway to make this a reporting company.

And if were a true effort to get to an exchange (NASD or AMEX), I'd gladly take a 5,000/1 reverse split to do it.


 
Posted by Wangdo on :
 
looks like the blocks of 9,9,7 will be prevalent
today.

so far 12 blocks
 
Posted by manfromjax on :
 
Reverse Split

IMHO I think QBID will have a RS, no mattert what FO has promised before. A stock like QBID that wants to be looked at as a good investment in the market can't have a 100 billion shares OS. Is a RS good? I have owned a few companies over the years that have done a RS (MSS, TWW, TFSM, ADSX, IWOV.) All of these companies are still surviving. Now true, on most the pps does go down afterwards. However, if QBID has a good subscription base (revenue) and low liabilities, in the long run it will survive. A 100B shares OS is ridiculous.
 
Posted by 4Tune4Me on :
 
Exactly, Gatorman. An RS would allow for further dilution and loss of investment $$. Frank finds the QBID investor a necessary nuisance instead of valuing them as a partner in developing his dream. He is not investor-friendly and unless forced by legal means, I suspect he won't willingly act in our best interest.
 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Bigrod40:
[Cool] INTERESTING INDEED

Wednesday, 11 January 2006
Q Television Becomes a Wholly Owned Subsidiary of Triangle Multi-Media
LOS ANGELES, CA, (NAMC) – On Tuesday the 24/7 premium television network geared towards the gay community, Q Television (PINK SHEETS: QBID) , made an announcement that the company will be accounted for as a wholly owned subsidiary of Triangle Mutli-Media.


According to the release Triangle Multi-Media will own 100% of Q Televisions asset base, even though the company operated as an independent entity since it’s inception.


Triangle Multi-Media and Q Television Network CEO Frank Olsen said "Up to thirty percent of QTN may be used for future financing and debt. With the accelerated growth of QTN, management felt it was time to formally announce this to QBID shareholders.”


This is why investing in a reporting company is essential for investors, when a company is not required to report investors are in the dark until they are allowed to see light.


In this case investors in Q Television lose their value but when a stock is trading at .0002 what should they expect.


Usually we would not report on stocks that trade on the Pink Sheets, but this just caught my attention.


David Kingston
Los Angeles News Correspondent
NAMC Newswire
www.namcnewswire.com

This guy is a tool. There ARE no QTN investors, QBID is TMM.
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by moneypenny:
quote:
Originally posted by Ad astra:
I am confused about a fear of a reverse split. If the value of the company can be confirmed by an independent audit...then what does it matter if there are 1 million shares or 100 billion?

If you want to buy a pack of Bubblegum and you have 100 pennies in your left pant pocket or a single dollar in your right pant pocket, either could be used to purchase the pack of Bubblegum, correct? Both have the same value.

And I have seen a number of companies successfully pull off the Reverse Split (JDSU recently).

I also like that TMM is getting The Q under GAAP accounting principles...it sounds like there may be an effort underway to make this a reporting company.

And if were a true effort to get to an exchange (NASD or AMEX), I'd gladly take a 5,000/1 reverse split to do it.

A 5000/1 split with a price of .01 would make my million shares of Q worth a whopping $2 .
WRONG! It'd be worth $200 at the time of the split...

1000000/5000= 200

5000x0.0002= $1/share

200x$1=$200

Now, if it goes down to $.01...then, you'd be correct.
 
Posted by Deg's wife on :
 
Well, I guess, in time, we will see how truthful Frank is. He has stated no reverse split while he is CEO. He hasn't became a bonified liar as of date, just hasn't told us the whole truth. I sure hope he keeps his promise this time.
 
Posted by moneypenny on :
 
OK MJM2005, gotcha! Kept thinking .01 since everyone says that's about where we should be, but that's now, before any split.
 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
Okay, only 4,400 blocks of 9 mil before Frank is finished putting the rest of the A/S into the float.

How many blocks have gone through since Dec 20?
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
Another "Fluffy" PR from Frankie boy.

Sandra Bernhard Signs Deal With Q Television Network to Co-Host 'Queer Edge With Jack E. Jett'
Jan 11, 2006 10:07:00 AM
BURBANK, Calif., Jan. 11 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- Q Television Network (QTN) (OTC: QBID) announced today that Sandra Bernhard has inked a deal to co-host forty (40) episodes of "Queer Edge with Jack E. Jett" beginning January 16th. In addition, Bernhard is also in negotiations to develop her very own series for the network. "Queer Edge with Jack E. Jett" airs nightly at 10 pm EST / 7 pm PST.

(Photo: http://www.newscom.com/cgi-bin/prnh/20060111/LAW045 )

"Sandra Bernhard is a fearless performer and iconic voice in our community," stated Alexis Fish, Senior Executive Vice President. "It is a tremendous honor and right of passage for us at QTN to showcase this caliber of artist and activist."

For 25 years, Sandra Bernhard has been challenging fans and critics with her knife-edged humor, satire and emotive performances on film, television and stage. Her critically acclaimed 1998, one-woman Broadway hit, "I'm Still Here...Damn It!" which played the Booth Theater, had critics raving. Since her first film accolades in 1983 in Martin Scorseses', "The King of Comedy" featuring Jerry Lewis and Robert De Niro, Bernhard has since appeared in numerous films including "Inside Monkey Zetterland," "Hudson Hawk" and more recently, "Dinner Rush." Throughout her career, Bernhard's formidable presence has also had a place on television. From 1991-1996, she portrayed Nancy on "Roseanne," and has had guest starring roles on "Ally McBeal," "Chicago Hope" and "Will & Grace." She hosted the season premiere of "MadTV" and the Bravo network recently profiled her career. In 2001, Bernhard hosted her own talk show, "The Sandra Bernhard Experience" for A&E television.

The irreverent and subversive Jack E. Jett, a self-described, "Homosupremacist" says "Sandra and I won't be trying to find an audience, we'll be looking for accomplices!"

A nightly talk show like nothing you've ever seen, "Queer Edge with Jack E. Jett" takes comedy to a whole new level. Host Jett focuses on pop culture and subculture with a cutting edge that is dynamic, witty and downright zany. The show covers everything from arts and news to celebrities and Internet subcultures -- all from a refreshing GLBT perspective. "Queer Edge" gives viewers a truly out-of-this-world experience as they are launched into the outlandish conversations between Jett and his hosts. Jack E. Jett's "Queer Edge" encompasses all that is queer in the world of counter-culture; in an effort to show that the word "queer" is more that just a term for gays.

About Q Television

This 24/7 premium television network is organized to create, develop and feature television programming for the gay and lesbian community, including live & interactive content every weeknight, plus sports, information and entertainment. While the company expects much of its subscriber base to be comprised of members of the gay and lesbian population, management also believes that quality programming about the gay and lesbian experience, designed to entertain, educate and inform, will attract many other segments of the viewing public.

The company's programming is available on a subscription basis to those desiring to subscribe. The monthly fee varies by region of the country. The network is telecast 24 hours per day, 7 days per week and features a variety of live and original programming. Q Television is available on such blue chip cable systems as Time Warner, Cox Communications and RCN, among others, with availability approaching 3 million digital cable households in the U.S. Q Television Network is the official network of Gay Games(r) VII. The network is also ad-supported. For further information on programming and subscriptions, please visit www.qtelevision.com.

MEDIA CONTACT: Jim Strzalkowski
T: 818-338-3555 Email: jim*prioritypr.net

INVESTOR RELATIONS: Richard Brown
T: 617-314-7379 Email: Staff*EquityRelations.com
SOURCE Q Television Network
 
Posted by redelmo19 on :
 
what a liar he is
 
Posted by ltesprit on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Doctoall:
HELP WANTED: Okay so you all know that we are planning on having a meeting in Burbank with "Q" on Thursday Jauary 12th 2006.

However, to date that have not given us a specific time for the meeting. We are asking that throughout today and tomorrow, you give a call to "Q" in Burbank and Palm Springs and remind them about the meeting on Thursday.

In order words please help us to keep the pressure on them. Please call the following numbers and if you cannot get through to Frank, Rene or Randy, then leave messages telling them that you expect the meeting to take place and you want to know the time.

The numbers are: Burbank: 1-818-848-5800
Palm Springs 1-760-323-4455.

It may not help but the effort would be appreciated, let them know that today is the day we want answers. [Big Grin]

I'll be calling them today, and the message I'll leave is 'what time will Olsen be meeting with the shareholders on the 12th?'
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
IMO the reason we got the "bone" yesterday was so that Frankie boy can continue can buy himself some more time and continue to stall the audit results; and to further postpone the meeting with Doc and Imak.
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
10 day trading avg 1.15B
current vol 487M
3x.0002
9X.0003
 
Posted by Bobbyd on :
 
Doc, Imak, Is the meeting with Frank still on for Thursday?
 
Posted by Wangdo on :
 
hey Dew you have a 90 or 100 day trading avg
 
Posted by Wangdo on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Bobbyd:
Doc, Imak, Is the meeting with Frank still on for Thursday?

Hey Bobby give them a call....

as of yesterday nothing on the books.

[/QUOTE]Originally posted by Doctoall:
HELP WANTED: Okay so you all know that we are planning on having a meeting in Burbank with "Q" on Thursday Jauary 12th 2006.

However, to date that have not given us a specific time for the meeting. We are asking that throughout today and tomorrow, you give a call to "Q" in Burbank and Palm Springs and remind them about the meeting on Thursday.

In order words please help us to keep the pressure on them. Please call the following numbers and if you cannot get through to Frank, Rene or Randy, then leave messages telling them that you expect the meeting to take place and you want to know the time.

The numbers are: Burbank: 1-818-848-5800
Palm Springs 1-760-323-4455.

It may not help but the effort would be appreciated, let them know that today is the day we want answers.
[/QUOTE]
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
No. Alpatrade only gives me 10 day. I will see if I can find somewhere else


quote:
Originally posted by Wangdo:
hey Dew you have a 90 or 100 day trading avg


 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
I'm not Doc ,but I was told by Doc that the meeting is to go down on thurs. Frank wants doc to get down there tonight, Doc's suspicion is that it will be an early meeting.????????? [Confused]

Isn't that good?
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
i think i understand where your thinking from but let me expand a bit on that.

there was nothing released yesterday that would give him any more legal right to postpone Doc and Monkey. They have a legal obligation to share that infor with them and spending that kind of money on prs yesterday is not going to give them any type of a legal stall tactic.

if they dont show Doc and Monkey the information that they are suppose to show, then the SEC will be recieveing a registered letter pointing out the failure to comply.

If this happens Frank has bigger problems on his hand.

I believe just by the sheer volume of news we recieved yesterday, that the pressure is being felt by Frank and crew, and they had to get this info out. This info had been ready to go for some time. these prs where not thrown together last minute, as they are all very well written and where not rushed in their preperation.

This is encouraging to me as it does not appear that these where last minute rush jobs to get news out to head off a problem.

Rod
quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
IMO the reason we got the "bone" yesterday was so that Frankie boy can continue can buy himself some more time and continue to stall the audit results; and to further postpone the meeting with Doc and Imak.


 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
It's good if it happens...

quote:
Originally posted by Esteban99:
quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
I'm not Doc ,but I was told by Doc that the meeting is to go down on thurs. Frank wants doc to get down there tonight, Doc's suspicion is that it will be an early meeting.????????? [Confused]

Isn't that good?

 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
Semi-Poll: Which sites do you subscribe to for you L2s?
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
PT, I agree. I also believe that the pressure from Doc and Imak is what drove Frankie boy to release that kind of info yesterday. IMO though, I believe Frankie will attempt to continue to stall the release of info. He may not flat out say NO, but he can continue to stall and postpone, which is NOT illegal.I think he is trying to buy more time (for whatever reason). This of course is speculation on my part.

quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
i think i understand where your thinking from but let me expand a bit on that.

there was nothing released yesterday that would give him any more legal right to postpone Doc and Monkey. They have a legal obligation to share that infor with them and spending that kind of money on prs yesterday is not going to give them any type of a legal stall tactic.

if they dont show Doc and Monkey the information that they are suppose to show, then the SEC will be recieveing a registered letter pointing out the failure to comply.

If this happens Frank has bigger problems on his hand.

I believe just by the sheer volume of news we recieved yesterday, that the pressure is being felt by Frank and crew, and they had to get this info out. This info had been ready to go for some time. these prs where not thrown together last minute, as they are all very well written and where not rushed in their preperation.

This is encouraging to me as it does not appear that these where last minute rush jobs to get news out to head off a problem.

Rod
quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
IMO the reason we got the "bone" yesterday was so that Frankie boy can continue can buy himself some more time and continue to stall the audit results; and to further postpone the meeting with Doc and Imak.



 
Posted by GatorMan on :
 
PT's "well written" comment regarding the PRs made me stop and go "huh?" as I didn't think it was all that well written. I re-read it and came to the part that states: "Up to thirty percent of QTN may be used for future financing and debt. With the accelerated growth of QTN, management felt it was time to formally announce this to QBID shareholders.". This part to me was not all that well written becasue I had no idea what it said. But as I though about it I wondered if it meant this. Right now QBID owns 100% of QTN. Frank is saying some of that 100% ownership might be sold off (up to 30%) for "future financing and debt". I think at some point we will come to find out that we only own 70% of QTN. Maybe potential future investors are more interested in owning QTN rather than QBID.
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Esteban99:
Semi-Poll: Which sites do you subscribe to for you L2s?

Ameritrade for otcbb, naz, nyse, amex,
Alphatrade for pinks
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
Wangdo try the link below on smallcapcenter.com. I use smallcap quite a bit. It give you 20 and 105 day and lots of other info/indicators for stocks.

http://www.smallcapcenter.com/snapshot_techanalysis.asp?component=compinfo.asp&row=2&page=snap_techanalysis.asp&flag=true&ticker=QBID


quote:
Originally posted by Wangdo:
hey Dew you have a 90 or 100 day trading avg


 
Posted by Etch on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Wangdo:
hey Dew you have a 90 or 100 day trading avg

90 moving average, simple, is .0007 from what I'm seeing.
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
Whats going on? Only MMs can get .0003 for their shares? I have a sell in since yesterday.
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
No. he I think he was asking for AVG trading VOLUME.

quote:
Originally posted by Etch:
quote:
Originally posted by Wangdo:
hey Dew you have a 90 or 100 day trading avg

90 moving average, simple, is .0007 from what I'm seeing.

 
Posted by Wangdo on :
 
thanks buddy
quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
Wangdo try the link below on smallcapcenter.com. I use smallcap quite a bit. It give you 20 and 105 day and lots of other info/indicators for stocks.

http://www.smallcapcenter.com/snapshot_techanalysis.asp?component=compinfo.asp&row=2&page=snap_techanalysis.asp&flag=true&ticker=QBID


quote:
Originally posted by Wangdo:
hey Dew you have a 90 or 100 day trading avg



 
Posted by Bigrod40 on :
 
Dig,
I have been trying to sell a stinky 1.5 million to see if it goes through, this since last week, and not a bite for even a partial fill.
MMs feeding off each other, or maybe Frankie Boy making some quick money. They are in bed together you know!! LOL
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
Theres a TV network in them thar hills.
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
WOW thats really a scary thought, thank you, i wont beable to sleep for a week now with that image...

quote:
Originally posted by Bigrod40:
Dig,
I have been trying to sell a stinky 1.5 million to see if it goes through, this since last week, and not a bite for even a partial fill.
MMs feeding off each other, or maybe Frankie Boy making some quick money. They are in bed together you know!! LOL


 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
Dew-it I agree they will more then likely be stalling as well. however, they have been advised by Washington state lawyers that he has to show them these documents, so as long as he follows the laws, and postpones in a legal manner, then in effect we are winning the fight.

Frank has a reason to be postponing this meeting, im hoping it is in an effort to protect a deal that is eminent.

Frank should not be afraid of a bad audit, as good or bad if he where to be reporting, this stock would be more encouraged to trade at its true valuation.

Lets just look at the situation for moment.

worse case scenario lets say the film library is only worth 200 million. the company is worth 100 million.

company is worth 300 million total

lets assume the worst. 100 billion shares out

that still gives us a value of .003

that is 10 times more then we are valued at right now.

OK now lets make this look worse.

lets say the entire company is worth 100 million.

that is still .001.

that is still 3-5 times higher then we are trading at right now.

So why would Frank be hiding this info. does anyone honestly believe that this company is worth less then the 20-30 million that this price represents that we are trading at right now.

anything that audit states over 30 million total value is a bonus and good news to anyone investing and holding at these prices.

That is why i believe that Frank is protecting a big deal. some thing big is about to happen and im placing 7 million share bet on that right now.


Doc and Monkey may not get all the info that they would like to get tomorrow, they may not get all the info you and i would like to see. they may not get any info tomorrow, but rest assured the pressure is on. the info is not far away, they can only postpone so long before they are into major problems.

I will respect Docs decisions on when and how to proceed from tomorrows meeting.

I feel good that by the end of this month, we are going to have a much brighter outlook as to what this company is doing and has in store for us.

I want to congratulate all the longs that have held strong to this point. I still feel that that stance will be rewarded.

Rod
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
Ya if your not a shareholder, your good in bed or anywhere else, so it seems.


quote:
Originally posted by Bigrod40:
Dig,
I have been trying to sell a stinky 1.5 million to see if it goes through, this since last week, and not a bite for even a partial fill.
MMs feeding off each other, or maybe Frankie Boy making some quick money. They are in bed together you know!! LOL


 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
Most if not all the buying and selling actitivity is happening at .0002. The MM keep shifting the BID accordingly between .0001/.0002 A few small buys are going through at .0003

quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
Whats going on? Only MMs can get .0003 for their shares? I have a sell in since yesterday.


 
Posted by a4realguy on :
 
You are asking some obvious questions.. the answers are not so obvious which is why there is so much speculation as to what is wrong with this stock. It appears to be things we don't know about that are affecting how things are, and why they aren't.... and nobody is speaking up... not yet anyway...


quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
Dew-it I agree they will more then likely be stalling as well. however, they have been advised by Washington state lawyers that he has to show them these documents, so as long as he follows the laws, and postpones in a legal manner, then in effect we are winning the fight.

Frank has a reason to be postponing this meeting, im hoping it is in an effort to protect a deal that is eminent.

Frank should not be afraid of a bad audit, as good or bad if he where to be reporting, this stock would be more encouraged to trade at its true valuation.

Lets just look at the situation for moment.

worse case scenario lets say the film library is only worth 200 million. the company is worth 100 million.

company is worth 300 million total

lets assume the worst. 100 billion shares out

that still gives us a value of .003

that is 10 times more then we are valued at right now.

OK now lets make this look worse.

lets say the entire company is worth 100 million.

that is still .001.

that is still 3-5 times higher then we are trading at right now.

So why would Frank be hiding this info. does anyone honestly believe that this company is worth less then the 20-30 million that this price represents that we are trading at right now.

anything that audit states over 30 million total value is a bonus and good news to anyone investing and holding at these prices.

That is why i believe that Frank is protecting a big deal. some thing big is about to happen and im placing 7 million share bet on that right now.


Doc and Monkey may not get all the info that they would like to get tomorrow, they may not get all the info you and i would like to see. they may not get any info tomorrow, but rest assured the pressure is on. the info is not far away, they can only postpone so long before they are into major problems.

I will respect Docs decisions on when and how to proceed from tomorrows meeting.

I feel good that by the end of this month, we are going to have a much brighter outlook as to what this company is doing and has in store for us.

I want to congratulate all the longs that have held strong to this point. I still feel that that stance will be rewarded.

Rod


 
Posted by Wangdo on :
 
this is exactly why i continue to hold my core and looking to add some more
quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
Dew-it I agree they will more then likely be stalling as well. however, they have been advised by Washington state lawyers that he has to show them these documents, so as long as he follows the laws, and postpones in a legal manner, then in effect we are winning the fight.

Frank has a reason to be postponing this meeting, im hoping it is in an effort to protect a deal that is eminent.

Frank should not be afraid of a bad audit, as good or bad if he where to be reporting, this stock would be more encouraged to trade at its true valuation.

Lets just look at the situation for moment.

worse case scenario lets say the film library is only worth 200 million. the company is worth 100 million.

company is worth 300 million total

lets assume the worst. 100 billion shares out

that still gives us a value of .003

that is 10 times more then we are valued at right now.

OK now lets make this look worse.

lets say the entire company is worth 100 million.

that is still .001.

that is still 3-5 times higher then we are trading at right now.

So why would Frank be hiding this info. does anyone honestly believe that this company is worth less then the 20-30 million that this price represents that we are trading at right now.

anything that audit states over 30 million total value is a bonus and good news to anyone investing and holding at these prices.

That is why i believe that Frank is protecting a big deal. some thing big is about to happen and im placing 7 million share bet on that right now.


Doc and Monkey may not get all the info that they would like to get tomorrow, they may not get all the info you and i would like to see. they may not get any info tomorrow, but rest assured the pressure is on. the info is not far away, they can only postpone so long before they are into major problems.

I will respect Docs decisions on when and how to proceed from tomorrows meeting.

I feel good that by the end of this month, we are going to have a much brighter outlook as to what this company is doing and has in store for us.

I want to congratulate all the longs that have held strong to this point. I still feel that that stance will be rewarded.

Rod


 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
PT, I hope your right. Sounds good on paper. Frank can't sell on bogus values at this time. So the jig is up and he might as well get realistic and honest about the whole thing. I don't know that he has to reveal deals that are in the works or not.
Frank is the general and Q is still in the infantry, we'll have to fight our way to the next level. [Roll Eyes]
 
Posted by Gordon Bennett on :
 
Who else here would be overjoyed just to break even?
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
Good question, it would be interesting to see how many people would want out at break even, rather than stick it out. I would probably keep some shares, .0000053%.

quote:
Originally posted by Gordon Bennett:
Who else here would be overjoyed just to break even?


 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
i would be happy to see green. but even is not near good enough for me.

I dont believe that is the best i will do. If all i do is break even then i will have considered this a falure as a company.

i believe that i am going to make bank on this stock, as i refuse to sell a single share for less then a proffit.

im rich or the stock goes bust in my mind. no inbetween for me.

Rod
 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
Frank is the general and Q is still in the infantry, we'll have to fight our way to the next level. [Roll Eyes]

Hahah, +10
 
Posted by Gordon Bennett on :
 
How high will it have to go for you to consider selling?

quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
i would be happy to see green. but even is not near good enough for me.

I dont believe that is the best i will do. If all i do is break even then i will have considered this a falure as a company.

i believe that i am going to make bank on this stock, as i refuse to sell a single share for less then a proffit.

im rich or the stock goes bust in my mind. no inbetween for me.

Rod


 
Posted by Etch on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
No. he I think he was asking for AVG trading VOLUME.

quote:
Originally posted by Etch:
quote:
Originally posted by Wangdo:
hey Dew you have a 90 or 100 day trading avg

90 moving average, simple, is .0007 from what I'm seeing.

d'oh. mis-read that from just skimming through to quickly. [Razz]
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by moneypenny:
OK MJM2005, gotcha! Kept thinking .01 since everyone says that's about where we should be, but that's now, before any split.

Yeah, but most likely...if we don't get any financials or other legit reasons to bring the price up, then it would probably cause the price to go down after a reverse split...
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
If this goes the way you like it and I of course, [Wink] I could sell some shares, buy a new car for cash and still get rich on Q stock.

quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
i would be happy to see green. but even is not near good enough for me.

I dont believe that is the best i will do. If all i do is break even then i will have considered this a falure as a company.

i believe that i am going to make bank on this stock, as i refuse to sell a single share for less then a proffit.

im rich or the stock goes bust in my mind. no inbetween for me.

Rod


 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
... Lets just look at the situation for moment ... Rod

Rod
Well done. You've made some excellent points to support your positive point of view. I realize that everything you've said is opinion, but it's just as likely to be true as any of the other speculations presented to us recently.

Which brings me to my main point: None of us knows where we stand as shareholders. None of us knows what Frank is doing, thinking or planning. None of us knows enough at this point to do anything but state opinions. Although I welcome all opinions, I cannot take any opinion seriously without seeing a reason for that opinion. So, everyone, please do us all a favor and explain why you think as you do. If you think Q is a good investment, explain why ... if you think Q is not a good investment, explain why.

And once again, Rod, you've done a great job expressing a positive side of the QBID saga with solid reasons why you think as you do. Since I also believe that Q is still a good investment, I agree with your comments. And if I'm wrong, so be it. But I prefer to see the "glass half full" until I see facts that prove me wrong. [Smile] [Wink]
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
B/L, well spoken. Our investment is down, but the fact of the matter is we still don't have enough evidence to cuff him....Innocent till proven guilty. I might be exagerating here, with the innocent part.
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Gordon Bennett:
Who else here would be overjoyed just to break even?

GB
I would be overjoyed to "be even" right now, since that would mean that Q's PPS was significantly higher than it is today ... and would mean that Q was moving in the right direction for me to continue to hold my shares for the "right sale price".

So, to answer your question, I do not intend to sell at my break-even point unless I see no possibility of higher prices. This might be greed talking, but it's my current opinion.
 
Posted by manfromjax on :
 
PT... I am with you. QBID will either make me a lots of money in a few years, or I'll lose about $11k if its become completely worthless. I will need a long term capital gain lost against my ELN profits anyway.

For you old people like me.. I remember:

back in the 70's when I first saw a Japanese car. It was so small I said myself..'who would ever want to drive a car that small?

I remember when they started selling bottle water. I said to my self 'who would ever buy bottle water?"

I remember when cable TV first came out, I said to myself..'who would ever pay for TV?'

Now, when I tell my friends that I own QBID, a gay TV network.. well you can imagine the remarks and looks that I get from them (down here in the south)

I believe QBID will make. It may not be the stock blockbuster we all dreaming about, but it will make it as long as it can sustain a subscription base.
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
quite a bit of buying going on at .0002
1.03B trades so far...
B/A .0001.0002
 
Posted by manfromjax on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
B/L, well spoken. Our investment is down, but the fact of the matter is we still don't have enough evidence to cuff him....Innocent till proven guilty. I might be exagerating here, with the innocent part.

Just remember. The stock price really doesn't matter (except to us shareholders) as far as the survivability of QBID. It is the Balance Sheet. As long as QBID doesn't have any major liabilities that would cause any creditor to come after it for payments. QBID can last forever, be it at .0002 or .00000000000000002
 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
quote:
This might be greed talking, but it's my current opinion.
That's why every single one of us is here, dude. To make money [Razz] Don't ever feel guilty for it.
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by manfromjax:
Just remember. The stock price really doesn't matter (except to us shareholders) as far as the survivability of QBID. It is the Balance Sheet. As long as QBID doesn't have any major liabilities that would cause any creditor to come after it for payments. QBID can last forever, be it at .0002 or .00000000000000002

mfj
Very true. The PPS is not what determines a company's value ... it's only what investors are willing to pay for a share ... and we've proven that share-buyers are not always right. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Esteban99:
That's why every single one of us is here, dude. To make money [Razz] Don't ever feel guilty for it.

E-99
Yep ... best comment of the day ... and NO ONE should disagree. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Deg's wife on :
 
I want to congratulate all the longs that have held strong to this point. I still feel that that stance will be rewarded.

Rod


Thank you, Rod
 
Posted by Ad astra on :
 
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Dew-it:
[QB] Another "Fluffy" PR from Frankie boy.

Sandra Bernhard Signs Deal With Q Television Network to Co-Host 'Queer Edge With Jack E. Jett'
Jan 11, 2006 10:07:00 AM
BURBANK, Calif., Jan. 11 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- ----------------

Dew, I disagree. Since this is a subscription-based revenue model, content is King.

Kmetko and Bernhard are big pickups.
 
Posted by Ligge on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Gordon Bennett:
Who else here would be overjoyed just to break even?

I would rather take the tax loss than break even at this point. I am in this for the long haul. I have already written off the money in my head as gambling loss so at this point it means nothing to me anyway. Either I end up financial set to take a few years off or I stay just where I am today.
 
Posted by ltesprit on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
[QB] i think i understand where your thinking from but let me expand a bit on that.

there was nothing released yesterday that would give him any more legal right to postpone Doc and Monkey. They have a legal obligation to share that infor with them and spending that kind of money on prs yesterday is not going to give them any type of a legal stall tactic.

if they dont show Doc and Monkey the information that they are suppose to show, then the SEC will be recieveing a registered letter pointing out the failure to comply.

If this happens Frank has bigger problems on his hand.

I believe just by the sheer volume of news we recieved yesterday, that the pressure is being felt by Frank and crew, and they had to get this info out. This info had been ready to go for some time. these prs where not thrown together last minute, as they are all very well written and where not rushed in their preperation.

This is encouraging to me as it does not appear that these where last minute rush jobs to get news out to head off a problem.

Rod

Well written? The mistaken use of 'SAAG' instead of 'GAAP' (twice!) and the grammatical errors? What company's PRs are you talking about here?
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
Another "Fluffy" PR from Frankie boy.

Sandra Bernhard Signs Deal With Q Television Network to Co-Host 'Queer Edge With Jack E. Jett'

Dew-it
I have to disagree ... any positive news from Q is good news and certainly not "fluff".

It's not the PR we are waiting for, but it's like caramel topping on one of Jennifer's cheesecakes ... it may not be needed but it does make the cake more tasty (no offense, Jenn, because I know your cheesecakes are perfect just the way they are [Smile] ).

Anyway, if you prefer to see the "glass half empty", so be it. I prefer to see the "glass half full". Although neither point of view will change a thing or make us any money, I bet I smile a lot more than you do ... [Big Grin] [Big Grin] [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ad astra:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Dew-it:
[QB] Another "Fluffy" PR from Frankie boy.

Sandra Bernhard Signs Deal With Q Television Network to Co-Host 'Queer Edge With Jack E. Jett'
Jan 11, 2006 10:07:00 AM
BURBANK, Calif., Jan. 11 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- ----------------

Dew, I disagree. Since this is a subscription-based revenue model, content is King.

Kmetko and Bernhard are big pickups.

A-a
I agree with you ... Sandra is a big draw, and Q's success is all about customers and revenue.
 
Posted by Jennifercd10 on :
 
Bottomliner
No offense taken. I usually top my cheesecakes.
 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
Are there still MMs at .0004?
 
Posted by manfromjax on :
 
I don't see many .0003 passing by anymore. I guess .0002 is it for awhile. I don't think we will see .0001. But who knows?
 
Posted by manfromjax on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by manfromjax:
I don't see many .0003 passing by anymore. I guess .0002 is it for awhile. I don't think we will see .0001. But who knows?

Speak of the devil..No sooner then I said no more .0001...look what shows up [Mad]
 
Posted by Optimus Prime on :
 
Re-read that again. That was not a PR, that was some guys thoughts on Q.

quote:
Originally posted by GatorMan:
PT's "well written" comment regarding the PRs made me stop and go "huh?" as I didn't think it was all that well written. I re-read it and came to the part that states: "Up to thirty percent of QTN may be used for future financing and debt. With the accelerated growth of QTN, management felt it was time to formally announce this to QBID shareholders.". This part to me was not all that well written becasue I had no idea what it said. But as I though about it I wondered if it meant this. Right now QBID owns 100% of QTN. Frank is saying some of that 100% ownership might be sold off (up to 30%) for "future financing and debt". I think at some point we will come to find out that we only own 70% of QTN. Maybe potential future investors are more interested in owning QTN rather than QBID.


 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
not looking pretty, but the majority if not all of the trading activity B/A is happening .0002. Some small .0001 and .0003 trades here and there...

vol 1.91B
18X.0001
3X.0002
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
four

quote:
Originally posted by Esteban99:
Are there still MMs at .0004?


 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
Just saw this on IHUB:
0002/0003 18 x 3

Looks good - confirm?
 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
And now:
0001/0002 18 x 5 v. 1.95bil

I need to stop looking.
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
nope.

vol 1.9.5B
18X.0001
5x.0002

quote:
Originally posted by Esteban99:
Just saw this on IHUB:
0002/0003 18 x 3

Looks good - confirm?


 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
So, if it hits 0001 on the ask. How many shares are we buying? LOL
 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
Me, none till next week. Takes Ameritrade 5 days to clear an ACH... incredibly annoying.
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
if i get my new job, alot. If i dont get my new job then none.
 
Posted by Pincher47 on :
 
At .0001 I will buy 25m, double up and then I am done.
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
....something big is about to happen and im placing 7 million share bet on that right now.


Rod

AAHHAAHAHAHA...love that attitude!

Guts of steel AC Cowboy....guts of steel! [Big Grin]
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
So, if it hits 0001 on the ask. How many shares are we buying? LOL

Be nice if my tax refund was available right now. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Ad astra on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jennifercd10:
Bottomliner
No offense taken. I usually top my cheesecakes.

Naughty Naughty!!!
 
Posted by Magfam on :
 
SURE WISH IT WAS WITH QTN

By Kimberly Speight

LOS ANGELES (Hollywood Reporter) - MTV Networks' gay-oriented Logo channel said Monday it partnered with Rosie O'Donnell to develop a sketch-comedy series.

The tentatively titled "Simply Sketch," which will feature a cast of up-and-comers, will be filmed in front of a studio audience with taped segments of musical numbers as well as commercial and movie parodies incorporating political satire.

Logo -- which targets lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender viewers -- also said that episodes will feature guest appearances by celebrities and "friends of the LGBT community." The show is slated to premiere later this year.

O'Donnell, who will serve as an executive producer, called the show "fresh and hilariously creative."

O'Donnell and the show's originators, Dan MacDonald and Joe Del Hierro, plan to collaborate with writers and producers from "The Rosie O'Donnell Show," which aired from 1996-2002 in syndication.

Logo, which launched June 30, is available in more than 19 million U.S. homes.

Reuters/Hollywood Reporter
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
Hey now, c'mon, QTN got Sandra Bernhard from the Rosane Barr Show... that's pretty close. LOL!

quote:
Originally posted by Magfam:
SURE WISH IT WAS WITH QTN

By Kimberly Speight

LOS ANGELES (Hollywood Reporter) - MTV Networks' gay-oriented Logo channel said Monday it partnered with Rosie O'Donnell to develop a sketch-comedy series.

The tentatively titled "Simply Sketch," which will feature a cast of up-and-comers, will be filmed in front of a studio audience with taped segments of musical numbers as well as commercial and movie parodies incorporating political satire.

Logo -- which targets lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender viewers -- also said that episodes will feature guest appearances by celebrities and "friends of the LGBT community." The show is slated to premiere later this year.

O'Donnell, who will serve as an executive producer, called the show "fresh and hilariously creative."

O'Donnell and the show's originators, Dan MacDonald and Joe Del Hierro, plan to collaborate with writers and producers from "The Rosie O'Donnell Show," which aired from 1996-2002 in syndication.

Logo, which launched June 30, is available in more than 19 million U.S. homes.

Reuters/Hollywood Reporter


 
Posted by Team Sleep on :
 
Even if the Q network raised Judy Garland from the dead and gave her a weekly variety show you'd never see this stock move...
 
Posted by Wangdo on :
 
okay stop already with the 9's
 
Posted by Ad astra on :
 
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Dew-it:
[QB] Hey now, c'mon, QTN got Sandra Bernhard from the Rosane Barr Show... that's pretty close. LOL!


IMHO, Rosie is a self-absorbed Baffoon with a twist of Diva to boot.

Sandra is edgy and racier. I think she is by far a better addition to The Q lineup.
 
Posted by manfromjax on :
 
Well, at least QBID didn't close in the Red. Otherwise it would have made my perfect day not so perfect. I hope someone took my stock suggestion this morning and bought some ELN... Don't put all your money in QBID!
 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
Past 3B
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
This is nuts!! volume is now at 3.34B. That is 1 Billion in A/H posts all buys at .0002. WTF!?
 
Posted by Wangdo on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
This is nuts!! volume is now at 3.34B. That is 1 Billion in A/H posts all buys at .0002. WTF!?

something strange a brewin'
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
I think the A/H finally stopped.
Vol 3,446,635,941
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Magfam:
SURE WISH IT WAS WITH QTN

"LOS ANGELES (Hollywood Reporter) - MTV Networks' gay-oriented Logo channel said Monday it partnered with Rosie O'Donnell to develop a sketch-comedy series."

Mag
I agree, Rosie would have been a great catch. But
Q can't hire every gay performer ... and they have a nice stable of "lesser-known" performers who appear to have a faithful audience (this is based only on what I've read about them since I admit I haven't seen many of them actually perform).

So, I don't consider this as being much of a negative ... it might even be a plus if other top gay stars choose to book with a competing network (like Q) rather than compete with Rosie at LOGO.

DISCLAIMER: I have OP disease (Obnoxious Positivity) for which there is no cure. And it has been only two minutes since my last positive statement ...

I think this is where you all yell "Hello, BL, welcome to OP Anonymous" ... but I could be wrong, since I've never attended any of the meeting. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
about 1.2B A/H X .0002 = $600K. Someone is stocking up.
 
Posted by one2watchny on :
 
FRANK and his family have an order in GTC for 75 billion shares, limit, .0002 [Wink]
He knew if he increased the A/S the price would drop this low.
 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
I wish, one2watchny.

So there were a few more trades yesterday, but does anyone have a total $ amount for both days?
 
Posted by Wangdo on :
 
Plus...Sandra probably comes a little cheaper than Rosie

quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by Magfam:
SURE WISH IT WAS WITH QTN

"LOS ANGELES (Hollywood Reporter) - MTV Networks' gay-oriented Logo channel said Monday it partnered with Rosie O'Donnell to develop a sketch-comedy series."

Mag
I agree, Rosie would have been a great catch. But
Q can't hire every gay performer ... and they have a nice stable of "lesser-known" performers who appear to have a faithful audience (this is based only on what I've read about them since I admit I haven't seen many of them actually perform).

So, I don't consider this as being much of a negative ... it might even be a plus if other top gay stars choose to book with a competing network (like Q) rather than compete with Rosie at LOGO.

DISCLAIMER: I have OP disease (Obnoxious Positivity) for which there is no cure. And it has been only two minutes since my last positive statement ...

I think this is where you all yell "Hello, BL, welcome to OP Anonymous" ... but I could be wrong, since I've never attended any of the meeting. [Big Grin]


 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
So uh, why aren't yesterday's PR's on the QTN site?
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Team Sleep:
Even if the Q network raised Judy Garland from the dead and gave her a weekly variety show you'd never see this stock move...

T S
I'd pay $7.95 to watch Judy Garland on Q ... assuming they did some really good makeup work. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Team Sleep on :
 
See, we have one taker!!!
 
Posted by Clyde_Crashcup on :
 
I think Barney the Purple Dinosaur also has OP..Poverty will cure you.


quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by Magfam:
SURE WISH IT WAS WITH QTN

"LOS ANGELES (Hollywood Reporter) - MTV Networks' gay-oriented Logo channel said Monday it partnered with Rosie O'Donnell to develop a sketch-comedy series."

Mag
I agree, Rosie would have been a great catch. But
Q can't hire every gay performer ... and they have a nice stable of "lesser-known" performers who appear to have a faithful audience (this is based only on what I've read about them since I admit I haven't seen many of them actually perform).

So, I don't consider this as being much of a negative ... it might even be a plus if other top gay stars choose to book with a competing network (like Q) rather than compete with Rosie at LOGO.

DISCLAIMER: I have OP disease (Obnoxious Positivity) for which there is no cure. And it has been only two minutes since my last positive statement ...

I think this is where you all yell "Hello, BL, welcome to OP Anonymous" ... but I could be wrong, since I've never attended any of the meeting. [Big Grin]


 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
‘The House of Art’: Judy Saslow to Host Gay Games Benefit
2006-01-11

City Treasurer Judy Rice and well-known philanthropist Michael Leppen will be the special guests at “The House of Art” Chicago Gay Games Benefit Thursday, Feb. 9. For art lovers the special bonus of the night will also be the world-class artwork that fills the Near North home of the host, Judy Saslow. With a large collection of European outsider art ( also called Art Brut ) , Saslow has accumulated her remarkable collection over more than 20 years and now also owns Judy A. Saslow Gallery. In addition to access to the world-class art throughout the Saslow home and remarks by Treasurer Rice and Mr. Leppen, the event will include live music by singer and pianist Elizabeth Doyle as well as refreshments catered by David Jenson Catering.

The House of Art benefit will take place on Thursday, Feb. 9, 5:30 to 8:30 p.m. at the home of Judy Saslow, 210 E. Pearson St. Tickets range in price from $150 to $2,500 with varying benefits per ticket level. RSVP is required as capacity is limited. Call ( 773 ) 907-2006, or reserve online at www.gaygameschicago.org . Attire is business casual and parking is available at Water Tower Place.

This event is co-hosted by Mike Demetria, Tracy Baim, Bob Klunk, Erik R. Sosa and Mark Kibby, Jeffrey Grinspoon and Jon Foley, Ronna Hoffberg and Dana Mikstay, Shawn McCormick, Greg McNitt, Bernard Bartilad, and Renae Ogletree.

Judy Saslow has been collecting art for more than 20 years. For the last 10 years, she has owned the Judy A. Saslow Gallery, which specializes in outsider, folk and contemporary art. The gallery has a large in-house collection of European outsider art ( also called Art Brut ) .

Saslow’s collection includes the largest group of art by artist Bill Traylor, as well as works by Henry Darger, Robert Motherwell, Michel Nedjar, Carlo Zinelli, Edmond Engel, Marco Raugei, Mr. Imagination, Ed Paschke, Nancy Paschke, Nathan Lerner, Lee Godie, Sava Sekulic, Giordano Gelli, Oswald Tschirtner, Jean Dubuffet, Tony Fitzpatrick, African objects and much, much more.

A regular for many years at Chicago’s famed Pump Room, Elizabeth Doyle has plied her singing, piano and composition skills at Maxim’s, the Cultural Center, Speakeasy Supper Club, the Fairmont Hotel and many other Chicago venues. This past May, she was invited a second time to sing an original Doyle/Kalt comedy number in New York City at an ASCAP/MAC new music showcase. She performed her fifth solo show at Davenport’s this past December.

Gay Games VII Sports and Cultural Festival will take place July 15-22. More than 12,000 athletes from more than 100 countries will compete in 30 sports ranging from softball to ******port, swimming to tennis. The weeklong event will include band, cheerleading and color guard performances, chorus, an ancillary arts festival, and a series of community-organized social events and parties. The opening ceremony is scheduled for July 15 at Soldier Field, the lakefront home stadium of American-style football’s Chicago Bears. Closing ceremony will be July 22 at Wrigley Field, the home of Major League Baseball’s Chicago Cubs, located in the heart of Chicago’s largest LGBT neighborhood.

For the first time, the Gay Games in Chicago will receive widespread television coverage on the Q Television Network. Global sponsors of Gay Games VII include PlanetOut/Gay.com; Q Television Network; Walgreens; Centaur Entertainment; Orbitz; Sydney New Mardi Gras; Olivia Cruises & Resorts; McKnight Kurland Baccelli; Human Rights Campaign; Chicago Free Press; Mate, Genre, Pink and Girlfriends Magazines; Windy City Media Group; and more than 120 business sponsors.

Registration for Gay Games VII is now open at www.GayGamesChicago.org ( English ) , www.GayGamesChicago.org/es/ ( Spanish ) , www.GayGamesChicago.org/fr/ ( French ) , and www.GayGamesChicago.org/de/ ( German ) .


http://www.windycitymediagroup.com/gay/lesbian/news/ARTICLE.php?AID=10529
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ad astra:
IMHO, Rosie is a self-absorbed Baffoon with a twist of Diva to boot. Sandra is edgy and racier. I think she is by far a better addition to The Q lineup.

Ad
Although I like Rosie "most of the time", I agree with you that Sandra has some attractions that Rosie doesn't ... actually, they cannot be compared very well since their "acts" are so different. I still think Sandra is a great addition to Q's stable. And there are a few more gay performers I hope they snag soon.
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
Countdown to the Gay Games ...
2006-01-11
Images for this article: (click on the thumbnail to see fullsize)
Profiles by Ross Forman

PEG GREY

Age: 60

Hometown: Hinsdale, Ill.

Status: Partner of 37 years, Grace

Job: Taught physical education at three South Side schools in the Chicago Public School System for 34 years. Retired five years ago.

Favorite TV Show: Commander In Chief

Favorite pro teams: Chicago Cubs, Bears and Bulls

Favorite Restaurant: Page’s in Hinsdale.

People Don’t Know That I … Am a great reader and gardener.

Peg Grey is set to compete this summer in her sixth Gay Games; however, her stylish t-shirt that she’ll wear to play volleyball and while running the 5K race still needs to be updated.

It then will read: 58 +1 +1 +1.

Grey, you see, will be 61 during the Opening Ceremony march into Soldier Field. She’s a legend in female athletics, a Hall of Famer who has championed the LGBT cause from her suburban Chicago home to San Francisco in 1986, Vancouver in 1990, New York City in 1994, Amsterdam in 1998 and Sydney in 2002. She’s also endured the hardships in recent years of bone marrow cancer when doctors told her she’d live only a few more years.

“It’s always been a dream of mine to have the Games here in Chicago,” Grey said. “I’m really looking forward to it. It’s just exciting to be able physically to compete. Everyone I talk to, I tell them: ‘If you don’t go and compete in the Games, you’ll be kicking yourself forever.’ If you can’t participate, at least be a volunteer or a spectator.

“I’m not nervous at all for the ( 2006 ) Games; I’m just excited. Chicago is the greatest LGBT sports city in the United States. I don’t think there’s any doubt or debate about that. I’m so excited we get to show it off.

“Even though the Gay Games is a sports and cultural event, it really is a pride festival. People get together from different countries, of different ages, races and languages, and we celebrate who we are as a people. Imagine the ( annual ) Gay Pride Parade and multiply it 100 times, that is what the Gay Games will be like. It’s just one big party. It’s hard to put the excitement into words.”

Suffice it to say, Halsted Street in Lakeview and Clark Street in Andersonville will be the same—a week-long Market Days-like fiesta.

“The Gay Games isn’t just for the best ( athletes ) ; it’s about participation,” Grey said. “The caring, sharing and the celebration is what I’m looking forward to.”

Especially since it wasn’t too long ago that female athletes didn’t participate in sports, including the inaugural Gay Games in San Francisco, where there were not many women.

It was Grey, though, who helped pave the female path to Gay Games glory.

“Women have the opportunity now, and that’s the greatest thing,” she said.

Grey’s sporting legacy in the LGBT community dates back 25 years, when she saw a sign for softball tryouts posted in a bar. Grey went and so started her amazing athletic adventure.

She was one of only a few females in the predominantly male league in 1980.

“That was the greatest thing that ever happened—getting involved with gay sports,” she said. “It’s hard for people now to realize what it was like years ago, when we were just getting started.”

She was a part of the Gay Athletic Association, predecessor to CMSA. Grey even served on its Board of Directors, always promoting the cause for women’s sports. That led to women’s volleyball, softball, basketball, tennis, bowling and racquetball, and, ultimately, touch football.

“In 1982, I heard some of the guys came back from this thing called the Gay Games and I couldn’t believe that this wonderful thing existed. However, no one was organizing the women ( for the Games ) ,” said Grey, who quickly formed Team Chicago, bound for the ‘86 Games in San Francisco.

For the 1990 Games in Vancouver, Grey was elected first female co-president of the Federation of Gay Games.

Grey formed the Golden Girls at age 58 and has long been a strong advocate for participation by seniors in all sports.

DAVE WAGNER

Age: 32

Hometown: Chicago ( Edgewater )

Status: Single

College: University of Wisconsin.

Hobbies: Reading and painting.

Favorite Restaurant: Meritage ( in Chicago’s Bucktown neighborhood ) .

It’s a Fact: Lived for eight months in Florence, Italy. Speaks Italian.

While at Milwaukee’s Pius XI High School in the early-1990s, Dave Wagner was a four-sport athlete: basketball, football, tennis and baseball—the latter of which was his best.

Wagner then moved across state, to the Madison campus of the University of Wisconsin, where he was an opposite hitter and setter for the Badgers’ club volleyball team.

Wagner has been in Chicago since 1999, an attorney for the past seven years, and quite involved in the local sporting scene. Wagner, 32, is now a five-sport stud: football, basketball, volleyball, tennis and softball.

He’s a volleyball player who’s switched to setter for Chicago Boom. He’s an A-Division football player for T’s, splitting time between wide receiver and defensive back. He’s a point guard in the Intermediate League for b-ball. Wagner plays singles and doubles tennis. And, he’s a left fielder and first baseman on the softball fields of Chicago.

“I’ve grown up with sports,” Wagner said. “It’s something you can completely lose yourself in, forget about things that are part of your everyday life. Sports are an outlet from the real world, an escape, a great way to take your mind and focus away from everything else around you.”

Wagner’s team ( Chicago Surge ) finished fifth this past August in the annual Gay Softball World Series in San Diego. He was on the second-place softball team in the 2000 World Series in Toronto, the highlight of his gay athletic career. Plus, he’s won numerous volleyball tournaments.

The 2006 Gay Games in Chicago will be Wagner’s first foray on the international sports scene.

“The Games seem like they’re very far off, but in reality they’re right around the corner,” Wagner said. “I’m pretty excited about the support for the Games in Chicago and the fact there will be ( thousands of ) people in the city for the Games and there are a lot of corporations stepping up and the city also is stepping up. That’s pretty amazing.”

Wagner is a sports commissioner for the Games, focused on volleyball. He plans to compete in indoor volleyball and softball, time permitting.

“I’ve competed in a lot of national tournaments, but it’s rare that you get to see—and go against—international competition. That’s very cool, and what separates the Gay Games from your average weekend tournament,” he said. “I’m excited, not nervous. I don’t really get nervous for sports. I’m anxious for the high level of competition that we’ll see in all of the sports. And just meeting other gay people from all over the world will be exciting, fun.”

But Wagner’s motivation for the Games is clear: “I want to win,” he said.


http://www.windycitymediagroup.com/gay/lesbian/news/ARTICLE.php?AID=10528
 
Posted by Jennifercd10 on :
 
Does anyone know when Q will start broadcasting on Selectv?
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Clyde_Crashcup:
I think Barney the Purple Dinosaur also has OP..Poverty will cure you.

Poverty hasn't cured me yet ... and I don't think it'll even get a chance this time ... now how's that for showing uncurable OP symptoms? [Big Grin]

Good to hear from you, Clyde ... you've been away too long. Are you just stopping by to say hello, or have you been lurking all this time?
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
Countdown to the Gay Games ... 2006-01-11

Interesting info, mjm ... thanks for posting.
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
Countdown to the Gay Games ... 2006-01-11

Interesting info, mjm ... thanks for posting.
No problem...

Oh, and Jen, I believe it's the beginning of March (if I remember correctly)...I glanced at their prospectus for the year (if that's the correct word for it)
 
Posted by Jennifercd10 on :
 
Thanks mjm
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
PT i finally got it, since you are claimed to be barney, i thought id give everyone a visual representation, thanks for the idea clyde_crashcup

 -
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
I've heard that Sandra is really good with her nose. [Big Grin]

quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by Ad astra:
IMHO, Rosie is a self-absorbed Baffoon with a twist of Diva to boot. Sandra is edgy and racier. I think she is by far a better addition to The Q lineup.

Ad
Although I like Rosie "most of the time", I agree with you that Sandra has some attractions that Rosie doesn't ... actually, they cannot be compared very well since their "acts" are so different. I still think Sandra is a great addition to Q's stable. And there are a few more gay performers I hope they snag soon.


 
Posted by BJ on :
 
Q should fight fire with fire, if they get Rossie O'Donnell, then QTN should be tryibg to get Ellen DeGeneres'.

She can be a great assest to QTN and I bet she has a large group of followers who would subscribe to Q or demand it..... [Razz]


quote:
Originally posted by Magfam:
SURE WISH IT WAS WITH QTN

By Kimberly Speight

LOS ANGELES (Hollywood Reporter) - MTV Networks' gay-oriented Logo channel said Monday it partnered with Rosie O'Donnell to develop a sketch-comedy series.

The tentatively titled "Simply Sketch," which will feature a cast of up-and-comers, will be filmed in front of a studio audience with taped segments of musical numbers as well as commercial and movie parodies incorporating political satire.

Logo -- which targets lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender viewers -- also said that episodes will feature guest appearances by celebrities and "friends of the LGBT community." The show is slated to premiere later this year.

O'Donnell, who will serve as an executive producer, called the show "fresh and hilariously creative."

O'Donnell and the show's originators, Dan MacDonald and Joe Del Hierro, plan to collaborate with writers and producers from "The Rosie O'Donnell Show," which aired from 1996-2002 in syndication.

Logo, which launched June 30, is available in more than 19 million U.S. homes.

Reuters/Hollywood Reporter


 
Posted by Clyde_Crashcup on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by Clyde_Crashcup:
I think Barney the Purple Dinosaur also has OP..Poverty will cure you.

Poverty hasn't cured me yet ... and I don't think it'll even get a chance this time ... now how's that for showing uncurable OP symptoms? [Big Grin]

Good to hear from you, Clyde ... you've been away too long. Are you just stopping by to say hello, or have you been lurking all this time?

Lurk mode. (you are uncurable !)
 
Posted by Pennies to Dollars on :
 
Doctoall and Imakmony:

The meeting is tomorrow, right? What time?
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
ellen would be fantastic if q could only get her to join. im not sure why she would being that she has a hit show of her own already but maybe in the future we might see her as a special guest on the q.

today is another interesting day. i cant wait to hear back from doc or imake about their trip i really hope that they get some good answers for us as we deserve it.

life is short take some gambles and remember you dont lose until you sell or this goes bankrupt. that is how i am looking at it.

oh yeah and to the question asked about would i sell if i was break even? i would have to aggree with bottomliner that if i was break even the pps would be significantly higher and in my mind might indicate a long term uptrend so no i would maintiain a core position of 20 million and maybe try to flip my other six that i have.

best of luck to all patient qbidians and qbidiots.

2006 is our year keep the qfaith and let the games begin q that is.............
 
Posted by Jennifercd10 on :
 
A few months ago I asked Frank about getting Rosie or Ellen. He said they asked Rosie and she wanted 400k a day! Enough said.
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
she isnt worth that in my humble opinion. sandra is very funny spunky and i think fits right in with the q crowd we have going. ellen would be a better fit than rosie.
 
Posted by Jennifercd10 on :
 
Ellen is under contract and for her to be a guest would have to be approved as per her contract. The best we could do would be to have one of Q’s Hosts on her show.
 
Posted by bige2533 on :
 
You can probably expect this to happen...

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=23B.16.040

Court-ordered inspection.

(1) If a corporation does not allow a shareholder who complies with RCW 23B.16.020(1) to inspect and copy any records required by that subsection to be available for inspection, the superior court of the county where the corporation's principal office, or, if none in this state, its registered office, is located may summarily order inspection and copying of the records demanded at the corporation's expense upon application of the shareholder.

(2) If a corporation does not within a reasonable time allow a shareholder to inspect and copy any other record, the shareholder who complies with RCW 23B.16.020 (2) and (3) may apply to the superior court of the county where the corporation's principal office, or, if none in this state, its registered office, is located for an order to permit inspection and copying of the records demanded. The court shall dispose of an application under this subsection on an expedited basis.

(3) If the court orders inspection and copying of the records demanded, it shall also order the corporation to pay the shareholder's costs, including reasonable counsel fees, incurred to obtain the order unless the corporation proves that it refused inspection in good faith because it had a reasonable basis for doubt about the right of the shareholder to inspect the records demanded.

(4) If the court orders inspection and copying of the records demanded, it may impose reasonable restrictions on the use or distribution of the records by the demanding shareholder.


[1989 c 165 § 185.]


quote:
Originally posted by Pennies to Dollars:
Doctoall and Imakmony:

The meeting is tomorrow, right? What time?


 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Clyde_Crashcup:
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
Poverty hasn't cured me yet ... and I don't think it'll even get a chance this time ... now how's that for showing uncurable OP symptoms? [Big Grin] ...

... you are uncurable !
Yep ... probably so. But since you brought it up, here's why: I believe OP disease (Obnoxious Positivity) is simply a manifestation of the theory of Self-fulfilling Prophecy. For anyone not familiar with this interesting and (in my opinion) successful process, here's some basic info:

Self-fulfilling prophecy, from Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia:

A self-fulfilling prophecy is a prediction that actually causes itself to become true, either positively or negatively.

Examples: If stock market investors widely believe a crash is imminent, they may lose confidence, sell their stocks in panic and actually cause the crash. Or, if investors believe the economy is robust and likely to continue to strengthen, they may bid stocks to new heights (remember the "bubble" days).

All I am really saying about being positive is that "it can't hurt" and it makes me feel better about Q's current situation. So what's wrong with that? [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Team Sleep on :
 
There's a fine line between faith and foolishness...
 
Posted by training4pennies on :
 
hey what ever happened to davidjanas ... didnt he say he spoke to frank or someone about audit being out jan 3 or 4?
 
Posted by buckwheatbob on :
 
I have to absolutely agree. So what you are saying is we would be completely foolish to have faith in you. I can see that [Smile]

quote:
Originally posted by Team Sleep:
There's a fine line between faith and foolishness...


 
Posted by Jennifercd10 on :
 
buckwheatbob: I also agree... you are very perceptive
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by bige2533:
You can probably expect this to happen...

http://apps.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=23B.16.040

Court-ordered inspection.

(1) If a corporation does not allow a shareholder who complies with RCW 23B.16.020(1) to inspect and copy any records required by that subsection to be available for inspection, the superior court of the county where the corporation's principal office, or, if none in this state, its registered office, is located may summarily order inspection and copying of the records demanded at the corporation's expense upon application of the shareholder.

(2) If a corporation does not within a reasonable time allow a shareholder to inspect and copy any other record, the shareholder who complies with RCW 23B.16.020 (2) and (3) may apply to the superior court of the county where the corporation's principal office, or, if none in this state, its registered office, is located for an order to permit inspection and copying of the records demanded. The court shall dispose of an application under this subsection on an expedited basis.

(3) If the court orders inspection and copying of the records demanded, it shall also order the corporation to pay the shareholder's costs, including reasonable counsel fees, incurred to obtain the order unless the corporation proves that it refused inspection in good faith because it had a reasonable basis for doubt about the right of the shareholder to inspect the records demanded.

(4) If the court orders inspection and copying of the records demanded, it may impose reasonable restrictions on the use or distribution of the records by the demanding shareholder.


[1989 c 165 § 185.]


quote:
Originally posted by Pennies to Dollars:
Doctoall and Imakmony:

The meeting is tomorrow, right? What time?


I would "think" Doc already knows this but I sure would feel a lot better if whoever has contact with him, to contact him and see if he is aware of this. [Big Grin]

Interesting read. Thanks Bige
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
Foolish or Faithful?

Now if the facts show a farce, we must face it that Frank has F***** us.

I fear it would be foolish for my faith to fail me, for I feel funny about our friends findings tomorrow. Fabulous facts my be forthcoming from Frank. Fear not the facts, for if not fraudulent then we may face a fantastic future instead of floundering here on the floor.

Boredom can be dangerous [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Wangdo on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
Foolish or Faithful?

Now if the facts show a farce, we must face it that Frank has F***** us.

I fear it would be foolish for my faith to fail me, for I feel funny about our friends findings tomorrow. Fabulous facts my be forthcoming from Frank. Fear not the facts, for if not fraudulent then we may face a fantastic future instead of floundering here on the floor.

Boredom can be dangerous [Big Grin]

Frankly I'm Flabbergasted [Smile]
 
Posted by laintbad on :
 
hi Jen,

I asked my friend who lives in Sydney about the QTV and selectTv combination. He said he gets select TV but has never heard of QTV.

I asked him to do more DD on this. I will keep everyone posted when I hear something about this.

Thanks.
 
Posted by Jennifercd10 on :
 
Thanks Laintbad
I went to their web site and couldn't find anything. Selectv is a big step and I would like to see it up and running with Q. Have a great evening, I'm on my way out dancing.
 
Posted by redelmo19 on :
 
I stopped my subscription
 
Posted by buckwheatbob on :
 
Dam Hoss,

That was so beautiful I almost shed a tear. [Smile]

quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
Foolish or Faithful?

Now if the facts show a farce, we must face it that Frank has F***** us.

I fear it would be foolish for my faith to fail me, for I feel funny about our friends findings tomorrow. Fabulous facts my be forthcoming from Frank. Fear not the facts, for if not fraudulent then we may face a fantastic future instead of floundering here on the floor.

Boredom can be dangerous [Big Grin]


 
Posted by suzainiee on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by laintbad:
hi Jen,

I asked my friend who lives in Sydney about the QTV and selectTv combination. He said he gets select TV but has never heard of QTV.

I asked him to do more DD on this. I will keep everyone posted when I hear something about this.

Thanks.

Perhaps he should look for QTN.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
LOL suz [Smile] [Smile] [Wink]
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
http://www.selecttv.com/index.php
 
Posted by suzainiee on :
 
Australia, mate!

Getting close to buying time, Sam.
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
much higher. nothing less the .05 at this point in the game. I will hold longer if and when i get an idea of the structure, the worth of the company and so forth.

but im willing to hold for at least 3 years yet.

im in no hurry on this one.

Rod


quote:
Originally posted by Gordon Bennett:
How high will it have to go for you to consider selling?

quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
i would be happy to see green. but even is not near good enough for me.

I dont believe that is the best i will do. If all i do is break even then i will have considered this a falure as a company.

i believe that i am going to make bank on this stock, as i refuse to sell a single share for less then a proffit.

im rich or the stock goes bust in my mind. no inbetween for me.

Rod



 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Team Sleep:
There's a fine line between faith and foolishness...

T S
Are you addressing this comment to me?
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
Foolish or Faithful?

Now if the facts show a farce, we must face it that Frank has F***** us.

I fear it would be foolish for my faith to fail me, for I feel funny about our friends findings tomorrow. Fabulous facts my be forthcoming from Frank. Fear not the facts, for if not fraudulent then we may face a fantastic future instead of floundering here on the floor.

Boredom can be dangerous [Big Grin]

H T
Super job... well done. Now, can anyone tell me what the hell Team Sleep was referring to? [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Wangdo:
quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
Foolish or Faithful?

Now if the facts show a farce, we must face it that Frank has F***** us.

I fear it would be foolish for my faith to fail me, for I feel funny about our friends findings tomorrow. Fabulous facts my be forthcoming from Frank. Fear not the facts, for if not fraudulent then we may face a fantastic future instead of floundering here on the floor.

Boredom can be dangerous [Big Grin]

Frankly I'm Flabbergasted [Smile]
Wangdo
Good one ... you and Hoss Trader should team up. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by redelmo19:
I stopped my subscription

redelmo
To what?
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
I knew who Sandra was long before i ever heard of Rosie.

if i had to pick between the to i can stand Sandra better. lol

but thats just me.

Rod

quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
Hey now, c'mon, QTN got Sandra Bernhard from the Rosane Barr Show... that's pretty close. LOL!

quote:
Originally posted by Magfam:
SURE WISH IT WAS WITH QTN

By Kimberly Speight

LOS ANGELES (Hollywood Reporter) - MTV Networks' gay-oriented Logo channel said Monday it partnered with Rosie O'Donnell to develop a sketch-comedy series.

The tentatively titled "Simply Sketch," which will feature a cast of up-and-comers, will be filmed in front of a studio audience with taped segments of musical numbers as well as commercial and movie parodies incorporating political satire.

Logo -- which targets lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender viewers -- also said that episodes will feature guest appearances by celebrities and "friends of the LGBT community." The show is slated to premiere later this year.

O'Donnell, who will serve as an executive producer, called the show "fresh and hilariously creative."

O'Donnell and the show's originators, Dan MacDonald and Joe Del Hierro, plan to collaborate with writers and producers from "The Rosie O'Donnell Show," which aired from 1996-2002 in syndication.

Logo, which launched June 30, is available in more than 19 million U.S. homes.

Reuters/Hollywood Reporter



 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
Man i knew that posting my profile would bite me one day lol


I knew something like this was coming lol


JACKASS lol


your alright my brother.


Rod

quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
PT i finally got it, since you are claimed to be barney, i thought id give everyone a visual representation, thanks for the idea clyde_crashcup

 -


 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
She is huge right now, as much as she would be a huge bonus, she is big dollars that we could not afford at this time. Rosie is washed up she doesnt have anything going right now. She would pay ya to work for ya. Ellen is on fire right now with her talk show.

Rod

quote:
Originally posted by BJ:
Q should fight fire with fire, if they get Rossie O'Donnell, then QTN should be tryibg to get Ellen DeGeneres'.

She can be a great assest to QTN and I bet she has a large group of followers who would subscribe to Q or demand it..... [Razz]


quote:
Originally posted by Magfam:
SURE WISH IT WAS WITH QTN

By Kimberly Speight

LOS ANGELES (Hollywood Reporter) - MTV Networks' gay-oriented Logo channel said Monday it partnered with Rosie O'Donnell to develop a sketch-comedy series.

The tentatively titled "Simply Sketch," which will feature a cast of up-and-comers, will be filmed in front of a studio audience with taped segments of musical numbers as well as commercial and movie parodies incorporating political satire.

Logo -- which targets lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender viewers -- also said that episodes will feature guest appearances by celebrities and "friends of the LGBT community." The show is slated to premiere later this year.

O'Donnell, who will serve as an executive producer, called the show "fresh and hilariously creative."

O'Donnell and the show's originators, Dan MacDonald and Joe Del Hierro, plan to collaborate with writers and producers from "The Rosie O'Donnell Show," which aired from 1996-2002 in syndication.

Logo, which launched June 30, is available in more than 19 million U.S. homes.

Reuters/Hollywood Reporter



 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
I knew who Sandra was long before i ever heard of Rosie. if i had to pick between the to i can stand Sandra better. lol but thats just me. Rod

Rod
I like them both ... but they are so different, I can't even begin to compare them. Sandra's looks and comedic routine is distinctly different from Rosie's. Trying to compare them is like comparing hockey and football ... both entertaining but in very different ways. I'm happy that Q has Sandra, but I also would welcome Rosie ... and Ellen ... and Jm Bullock ... and so many more great gay entertainers. I also would like to see some non-gay entertainers signing on. I'm sure GLBT people enjoy being entertained by non-gays, just as much as the rest of us.

Maybe I should contact Q about booking talent for them ... I could be their token straight guy. And if the money is right, I'd also consider ... well, maybe not ... BUT SHOW ME THE MONEY and let me decide!! [Eek!] [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
I agree as well.

Rod

quote:
Originally posted by buckwheatbob:
I have to absolutely agree. So what you are saying is we would be completely foolish to have faith in you. I can see that [Smile]

quote:
Originally posted by Team Sleep:
There's a fine line between faith and foolishness...



 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
Have fun DOC and IMAK. Thanks again to the both of you
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
BT i agree it would be great to have any and all tallent.

but that will come in time.

Sandra is a good start for sure.

Ellen well that would be a trophey if we got her, but never rule out anything right?!!

look at Sirius, who ever thought back in the early days of Sirius that they would ever have Howard Stern? I would not have bet on that one.

but hey look at it now, and look at the bet that Sirius is making. 500 million for 5 years.

that is a big chunk of change for one tallent.

so never say never. but it do believe it is safe to say for now Ellen is a long way off but would be a dream come true.
 
Posted by Silence is gold on :
 
Helllo Guys,

How much it will take untill QBID go UP UP UP i can't wait more.... to sell....... p~~`
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
I may be a jackass but at least im not corrupting little kids minds, i always wondered who wore that suit [Big Grin]

quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
Man i knew that posting my profile would bite me one day lol


I knew something like this was coming lol


JACKASS lol


your alright my brother.


Rod

quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
PT i finally got it, since you are claimed to be barney, i thought id give everyone a visual representation, thanks for the idea clyde_crashcup

 -



 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
somewhere between 1 day and 1 year.

give or take a couple years.

i feel pretty good with this answer.

Rod

quote:
Originally posted by Silence is gold:
Helllo Guys,

How much it will take untill QBID go UP UP UP i can't wait more.... to sell....... p~~`


 
Posted by quikI8holes on :
 
Ad astra
Member


Member Rated:
posted January 11, 2006 09:45
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am confused about a fear of a reverse split. If the value of the company can be confirmed by an independent audit...then what does it matter if there are 1 million shares or 100 billion?

If you want to buy a pack of Bubblegum and you have 100 pennies in your left pant pocket or a single dollar in your right pant pocket, either could be used to purchase the pack of Bubblegum, correct? Both have the same value.
 
Posted by quikI8holes on :
 
TAHT WAS THE DUMEST ANALOGY I HAVE EVER HEARD OF
 
Posted by quikI8holes on :
 
HOW ABOUT A HUNDRED SHARES FOR ONE DOLLAR AND ONE SHARE FOR ONE DOLLAR. THAT IS MORE WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT. SORRY BUT i HAVE BEEN DRINKING TOO MUCH BUT I AINT THAT STUPID
 
Posted by CHIMAN34 on :
 
I take it that Doc and Ik will be there today.
I don't recall reading either last night on the boards, which means I guess they took a flight out.
I thought I read where Penny said they may have an early meeting.
We will find out today.
Good day all

Dave
 
Posted by a4realguy on :
 
Regarding this meeting... why do we have reason to expect anything of value for us to come from it?
 
Posted by 4Tune4Me on :
 
Quik, after an RS the value of your holding is the same BUT the pps is much higher and the number of shares you're holding is much less. This allows the CEO to further increase the amount of shares available for purchase thereby causing the pps to drop significantly again. It's the proverbial drawing blood from a stone. In this case, it's squeezing the last possible dollar out of an investor.
 
Posted by 4Tune4Me on :
 
The value is in giving Frank a wakeup call with the message that investors are entitled to accountability when they buy into his dream.
 
Posted by GatorMan on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by 4Tune4Me:
Quik, after an RS the value of your holding is the same BUT the pps is much higher and the number of shares you're holding is much less. This allows the CEO to further increase the amount of shares available for purchase thereby causing the pps to drop significantly again. It's the proverbial drawing blood from a stone. In this case, it's squeezing the last possible dollar out of an investor.

The CEO doesn't need to further increase the amount of shares available (the A/S). The A/S is not necessasirly changed due to the reverse split. The decision to R/S, and the decision to R/S the A/S are two SEPETARTE decisons. The CEO can do one without doing the other. It works the same way with a forward split.
 
Posted by 4Tune4Me on :
 
Gatorman, in Pennyland it's rare to find an R/S without a subsequent A/S.
 
Posted by GatorMan on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by 4Tune4Me:
Gatorman, in Pennyland it's rare to find an R/S without a subsequent A/S.

That may be. My point is just to clearify that a R/S does not AUTOMATICALY R/S the A/S. That's a seperate action and may or may not take place.
 
Posted by 4Tune4Me on :
 
Point taken... it most certainly is a separate action.
 
Posted by Ad astra on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by quikI8holes:
TAHT WAS THE DUMEST ANALOGY I HAVE EVER HEARD OF

Apparently not as DUMB as your ability to spell, Chim Chim.
 
Posted by Ad astra on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by quikI8holes:
Ad astra
Member


Member Rated:
posted January 11, 2006 09:45
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I am confused about a fear of a reverse split. If the value of the company can be confirmed by an independent audit...then what does it matter if there are 1 million shares or 100 billion?


If you want to buy a pack of Bubblegum and you have 100 pennies in your left pant pocket or a single dollar in your right pant pocket, either could be used to purchase the pack of Bubblegum, correct? Both have the same value.

---------------
Okay, let's talk this out. QBID is our pack of gum. It is valued at $1. QBID could be bought using 100 pennies, 4 quarters, or a single dollar bill.

My point is simple. If value of Q is set by an independent audit, what difference does it make if QBID has 1 share outstanding, 4 shares outstanding, 100 shares outstanding or 100 billions shares outstanding? Simple math can place a value on each share, depending on the number of shares.

I just dont think the number of outstanding shares matter if an independent audit places a tangible, quantifiable price value on TMM. (HUGE CAVEAT: So long as Frank isnt diluting post audit). To date, this is only an increase in A/S, but no word about increase in O/S

When you sober up, grab a coffee and let's talk?I'd be happy to hear your position in a more articulate manner (i hope).
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ad astra:
quote:
Originally posted by quikI8holes:
TAHT WAS THE DUMEST ANALOGY I HAVE EVER HEARD OF

Apparently not as DUMB as your ability to spell, Chim Chim.
Damn. You beat me to it [Big Grin]

I don't usually say anything about spelling or typos. But misspelling the word dumb is just toooooo funny!
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by quikI8holes:
HOW ABOUT A HUNDRED SHARES FOR ONE DOLLAR AND ONE SHARE FOR ONE DOLLAR. THAT IS MORE WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT. SORRY BUT i HAVE BEEN DRINKING TOO MUCH BUT I AINT THAT STUPID

just for reference again.

 -
 
Posted by Pincher47 on :
 
Who thinks today we will hear something, or when they get back they won't be able to? I know ever since DJ went there last he hasn't posted.
 
Posted by Ligge on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
quote:
Originally posted by quikI8holes:
HOW ABOUT A HUNDRED SHARES FOR ONE DOLLAR AND ONE SHARE FOR ONE DOLLAR. THAT IS MORE WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT. SORRY BUT i HAVE BEEN DRINKING TOO MUCH BUT I AINT THAT STUPID

just for reference again.

 -

MM you owe me a new monitor - this one is now coated in coffee!
 
Posted by manfromjax on :
 
I don't like these .0001 going by, even if I do have a buy in for a few million at this price. It just doesn't look good. [Mad]
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
Im sorry ligge, did i get you so upset with that post you threw your coffee at your monitor to get to me? I appologize if i upset you in any way.
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
No you didn't hear that from me, guaranteed. from what i know Doc was still not aware of the time or even if the meeting would occur.

if i get any word i will update. but last i heard yesterday was that Doc was not certain if the meeting was on or off.

Rod

quote:
Originally posted by CHIMAN34:
I take it that Doc and Ik will be there today.
I don't recall reading either last night on the boards, which means I guess they took a flight out.
I thought I read where Penny said they may have an early meeting.
We will find out today.
Good day all

Dave



[ January 12, 2006, 10:15: Message edited by: Penny-Trader ]
 
Posted by 4Tune4Me on :
 
My guess is that they will have to sign a non-disclosure agreement.
 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
How many .0001 blocks went through so far?
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
Would it be a good thing or a bad thing if they have to sign a NDA?
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
Is this a disgruntled penny stock trader?


http://i24.photobucket.com/albums/c40/seshi_luver12/animations/lollol.gif
 
Posted by Sam1959 on :
 
To Doc and Imak:

Good luck today. We really appreciate all the time, money and effort that you have contributed to getting information from TMM. [Smile]
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
i wouldnt post anymore either if i where David, the way this board treated him.


quote:
Originally posted by Pincher47:
Who thinks today we will hear something, or when they get back they won't be able to? I know ever since DJ went there last he hasn't posted.


 
Posted by Sam1959 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
Would it be a good thing or a bad thing if they have to sign a NDA?

Having to sign a Non Disclosure Agreement (NDA) would essentially keep them from passing on what they learn to the rest of us.
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
Is this a disgruntled penny stock trader?


http://i24.photobucket.com/albums/c40/seshi_luver12/animations/lollol.gif

Good one ... [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
Woops double post
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
Sorta i believe that is Richard Brown at IHUB or it could be U4 the wonder trader [Big Grin]


quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
Is this a disgruntled penny stock trader?


http://i24.photobucket.com/albums/c40/seshi_luver12/animations/lollol.gif


 
Posted by Ligge on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
Would it be a good thing or a bad thing if they have to sign a NDA?

Honestly, I think that could go either way. NDA could be to hide bad information or to hide the ongoing negotiations with XYZ cable/satelitte system/buyer they don't want to screw up.

Signing the NDA means almost nothing and Frank has to know that too. You can tell me that I can not pass on information and I can still very easily say that "I came back 100% confident in what I saw and in the future of my investment" - doesnt break NDA and for some of us Doc or Imak saying that would be enough.

If he does make them sign NDAs it could very likely start a mass of other investors sending certified letter requests for access to that information. I seriously doubt Frank wants 200 requests next week for seperate meetings to go over the books and information he has there.

If he did do that I bet we could get Doc and Imak to give us copies of what they sent as their request so that any of us that wanted could copy it and do the same thing. That is a headache Frank does not need or want and one that I will be more than willing to give him. Palm Springs isnt that far of a drive and Burbank is just a few extra hours. I am sure my kids would love a quick Disney trip anyway.
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
I understand what a NDA is, the context of the question is, would it mean the information they are told be more of the bad news or good news varity if they have to sign a NDA. Or at least by the laws of statistics and probability, would it mean its good news or bad news. Just becuase they have to sign an NDA dosnet mean its good news. Just curious for other peoples opinions on the siutation.

Thank you ligge, i appreciate you understanding the spirit of the question and me not having to explain it to you [Smile] ... btw is your monitor clean yet ?

quote:
Originally posted by Sam1959:
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
Would it be a good thing or a bad thing if they have to sign a NDA?

Having to sign a Non Disclosure Agreement (NDA) would essentially keep them from passing on what they learn to the rest of us.

 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
yup exacyly what i was thinking but i was going to wait till after they had stated that they had to sign them. I will encourage each and every one of us to send the letters. even if you dont have the intentions of going. it would send the message again.


I imagine the other day the phone calls that went into the Q offices was wild. my bet is there where at least 200 calls. if they got a couple hundred letters requesting these meetings it would cripple Frank for months in meetings.

He doesnt have that kind of time, and they may consider making the info public. at that point you may as well.

but yes you have a good point.

Rod


quote:
Originally posted by Ligge:
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
Would it be a good thing or a bad thing if they have to sign a NDA?

Honestly, I think that could go either way. NDA could be to hide bad information or to hide the ongoing negotiations with XYZ cable/satelitte system/buyer they don't want to screw up.

Signing the NDA means almost nothing and Frank has to know that too. You can tell me that I can not pass on information and I can still very easily say that "I came back 100% confident in what I saw and in the future of my investment" - doesnt break NDA and for some of us Doc or Imak saying that would be enough.

If he does make them sign NDAs it could very likely start a mass of other investors sending certified letter requests for access to that information. I seriously doubt Frank wants 200 requests next week for seperate meetings to go over the books and information he has there.

If he did do that I bet we could get Doc and Imak to give us copies of what they sent as their request so that any of us that wanted could copy it and do the same thing. That is a headache Frank does not need or want and one that I will be more than willing to give him. Palm Springs isnt that far of a drive and Burbank is just a few extra hours. I am sure my kids would love a quick Disney trip anyway.


 
Posted by Ligge on :
 
Clean? Pssst! You can clean this one up yourself when you drop off the new one! [Cool]
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
i tell ya what, when qbid gets up to $1.00 ill buy you any type of monitor you want [Big Grin] thats under 45 inches

quote:
Originally posted by Ligge:
Clean? Pssst! You can clean this one up yourself when you drop off the new one! [Cool]


 
Posted by a4realguy on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by a4realguy:
Regarding this meeting... why do we have reason to expect anything of value for us to come from it?

Ok, but what makes this meeting any different than the conference calls, and onsight visits by people from this board that were expressing the same concept then? Why should this meeting provide any different results? This isn't a question of negativity, I am only seeking information.. if it is just someone's opinion that this meeting will be different than all the rest, that's not enough. Are their any facts and or factors that are not opinion based that give us cause to expect real information this time?
 
Posted by 4Tune4Me on :
 
My guess is that they will be asked to sign an NDA because they will be shown information that has not been made public. If it's not been made public, my guess is it's less than flattering.
 
Posted by Ad astra on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
i wouldnt post anymore either if i where David, the way this board treated him.


quote:
Originally posted by Pincher47:
Who thinks today we will hear something, or when they get back they won't be able to? I know ever since DJ went there last he hasn't posted.


-------
Penny-I just think alot of folks gave up on him because every time he predicted something, it never came true. I suspect it was probably Frank's fault.
 
Posted by Ligge on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
i tell ya what, when qbid gets up to $1.00 ill buy you any type of monitor you want [Big Grin] thats under 45 inches

quote:
Originally posted by Ligge:
Clean? Pssst! You can clean this one up yourself when you drop off the new one! [Cool]


Woohoo - just in case... I am saving the post. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
you know what ligge ill even throw in a new home computer just for you, and heres what it will look like.

 -
 
Posted by bbsocmicaa on :
 
How many effs in audit?
There is no f in audit.
Right
 
Posted by IntheCurl on :
 
Not only would Doc and Imakmoney have to sign a non-disclosure agreement, but they may be restricted from trading the stock for a period of time after they view the documents(IMO)...so, they are really making quite a sacrifice to do what they are doing....I thank them, and wish them both well....
 
Posted by Ligge on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
you know what ligge ill even throw in a new home computer just for you, and heres what it will look like.

 -

I am getting NASA!!!???
 
Posted by quikI8holes on :
 
OK, I am up and sober this morning checking the share price.I guess I was a DUMBY haha last night, or should I say this morning. Anyway, it looks like I may be able to double my position soon for only three hundred dollars.
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
yup exacyly what i was thinking but i was going to wait till after they had stated that they had to sign them.

Rod
Gotta agree with you ... again ( [Eek!] ).

We can speculate all we want about what might happen today, and we can "plan" our next moves ... no harm in being prepared. But most planning at this point is unnecessary because no matter what happens, we'll have plenty of time to react to it.

As always, I believe today will be positive for Q shareholders ... we may not hear what we expect or want ... but we should know more than we know now, and that alone will be a big PLUS.

Anyway, it's very unlikely that we will hear anything until late evening ... unless Frank decides to "spill all the beans" via a PR today. So, I have some errands to run and will see everyone later today.

GL to us all ... and to Doc and imak ... and to Frank also (no matter what we think of him right now, we still want him to grow Q into a success network ... right?)
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ligge:
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
you know what ligge ill even throw in a new home computer just for you, and heres what it will look like.

 -

I am getting NASA!!!???
No that would be this,
 -

So your not getting NASA sorry

However i will be buying myself this

 -
 
Posted by quikI8holes on :
 
When you sober up, grab a coffee and let's talk?I'd be happy to hear your position in a more articulate manner (i hope).


No harm intended, It just struck me funny that in your analogy of the reverse split you stated that a dollar bill or a hundred pennies would buy the same pack of gum. Actually it would only buy a percentage of that pack of gum after the reverse split, with the small percentage of that pack of gum still being worth a dollar bill or a hundred pennies
 
Posted by Ad astra on :
 
No worries Quik. All is good. I wasnt necessarily talking about a reverse split in as much i was addressing the issue of the overall O/S amount. If a company is worth $100 i dont think it matters if there are only two shares worth $50 each or 100 shares worth $1 each.

But enough of that. Let's just both hope The Q moves north, deal? [Smile]
 
Posted by Sam1959 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
I understand what a NDA is, the context of the question is, would it mean the information they are told be more of the bad news or good news varity if they have to sign a NDA. Or at least by the laws of statistics and probability, would it mean its good news or bad news. Just becuase they have to sign an NDA dosnet mean its good news. Just curious for other peoples opinions on the siutation.

Thank you ligge, i appreciate you understanding the spirit of the question and me not having to explain it to you [Smile] ... btw is your monitor clean yet ?

quote:
Originally posted by Sam1959:
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
Would it be a good thing or a bad thing if they have to sign a NDA?

Having to sign a Non Disclosure Agreement (NDA) would essentially keep them from passing on what they learn to the rest of us.

Sorry. Many times folks assume that everyone else knows the meaning of all these abbreviations without any explanation and I wasn’t sure that you knew what NDA stood for. I didn’t realize that you were looking for people to speculate on the subject.
 
Posted by 4Tune4Me on :
 
Not a .0003 in sight....
 
Posted by milliam on :
 
Anybody signed up for Buyin.net? Its a website that lists stocks with naked short selling. Supposedly they tell you when the shorts are getting squeezed and thus you should buy in. Anyway, looks like they have QBID on there (so they believe its been naked short sold), but you have to pay $10/month for their info.

Good luck Doc and Imak!!! I sure hope this is a good day for us all.
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by milliam:
Anybody signed up for Buyin.net? Its a website that lists stocks with naked short selling. Supposedly they tell you when the shorts are getting squeezed and thus you should buy in. Anyway, looks like they have QBID on there (so they believe its been naked short sold), but you have to pay $10/month for their info.

Good luck Doc and Imak!!! I sure hope this is a good day for us all.

Thanks, milliam. Good info.
 
Posted by manfromjax on :
 
We must be civil to each other here or..

Man sues chatroom pals: I was humiliated beyond what 'no man could endure'

Sue me
 
Posted by bige2533 on :
 
Does anyone have the play-by-play for the meeting today? Is it a go or not?
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
Thanks Doc and Imak
 
Posted by Ligge on :
 
Tick tock
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by manfromjax:
We must be civil to each other here or..

Man sues chatroom pals: I was humiliated beyond what 'no man could endure'

Sue me

WOW, great story. Thanks for posting. [Smile]
 
Posted by Ad astra on :
 
WOW. .0001 I should waited until today to buy.

Guess I picked a bad week to quit sniffing glue!
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ad astra:
WOW. .0001 I should waited until today to buy.

Guess I picked a bad week to quit sniffing glue!

Ad
Walmart ... two for a buck. Smells like oranges but it does the trick. [Big Grin] And pick up a couple for me.
 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ad astra:
Guess I picked a bad week to quit sniffing glue!

Great quote
 
Posted by bige2533 on :
 
Like it wasn't justified...

quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
i wouldnt post anymore either if i where David, the way this board treated him.


quote:
Originally posted by Pincher47:
Who thinks today we will hear something, or when they get back they won't be able to? I know ever since DJ went there last he hasn't posted.



 
Posted by Bigrod40 on :
 
[Embarrassed] Tried all day to sell 2.1 Million at .0002 for the heck of it, not even a partial fill.

Been a QBID fan for 2 years, but I am reaching the point that I have to say this is starting to reek like CMKX as it slowly fell back to .0001.
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
fear not, all shall be revealed, all one has to do is look
 -

just dont get your eye poked out.
 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
Any confirmation of the meeting?
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
fear not, all shall be revealed, all one has to do is look ... just dont get your eye poked out.

MM
I'm impressed ... you are both optimistic and realistic [Big Grin] (and the graphics were great too).
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm


5 stars any questions?


quote:
Originally posted by bbsocmicaa:
How many effs in audit?
There is no f in audit.
Right


 
Posted by manfromjax on :
 
Not a good sign to close at .0001.

But I guess there aren't any good signs with QBID.

I want to be positive, but it is getting more depressing everyday. All I can imagine if we sell off at .0001 is that .000099 is next!

As I type here comes those .0001 9 million lots
 
Posted by mydream1 on :
 
R/S comming,Death comming.
 
Posted by manfromjax on :
 
QBID is now only valued at 10 million $$. Not much is it?
 
Posted by Pincher47 on :
 
Any after hours numbers yet?
 
Posted by mydream1 on :
 
Looks Frank want the whole world own QBID shares!!!We are the super-super-...company. [Smile]
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
Man, this really sux! Something is really, really wrong with this picture.

QBID closes .0001
MLON closes .0003
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
A/H trade postings - roughly 200M

16:07:39 7000000 0.0001 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:07:39 9000000 0.0001 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:07:33 9000000 0.0001 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:07:27 9000000 0.0001 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:07:24 9000000 0.0001 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:07:18 9000000 0.0001 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:07:12 9000000 0.0001 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:07:09 9000000 0.0001 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:07:03 9000000 0.0001 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:06:57 9000000 0.0001 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:06:54 9000000 0.0001 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:06:48 9000000 0.0001 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:06:42 9000000 0.0001 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:06:39 9000000 0.0001 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:06:33 9000000 0.0001 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:06:27 9000000 0.0001 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:06:18 9000000 0.0001 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:06:12 9000000 0.0001 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:06:06 9000000 0.0001 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:06:06 5000011 0.0002 + OTCEQ_NBB ?1 (SF)
16:06:06 9999999 0.0002 + OTCEQ_NBB ?1 (SF)
16:06:06 9999999 0.0002 + OTCEQ_NBB ?1 (SF)
16:06:06 9999999 0.0002 + OTCEQ_NBB ?1 (SF)
16:06:06 9999999 0.0002 + OTCEQ_NBB ?1 (SF)
16:06:06 9999999 0.0002 + OTCEQ_NBB ?1 (SF)
16:06:06 9999999 0.0002 + OTCEQ_NBB ?1 (SF)
16:06:06 9999999 0.0002 + OTCEQ_NBB ?1 (SF)
16:06:06 9999999 0.0002 + OTCEQ_NBB ?1 (SF)
16:06:06 9999999 0.0002 + OTCEQ_NBB ?1 (SF)
16:06:03 9999999 0.0002 + OTCEQ_NBB ?1 (SF)
16:06:03 9999999 0.0002 + OTCEQ_NBB ?1 (SF)
16:06:03 9000000 0.0001 + OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:05:57 9000000 0.0001 + OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:05:51 9000000 0.0001 + OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:05:48 9000000 0.0001 + OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:05:39 9000000 0.0001 + OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:05:36 9000000 0.0001 + OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:05:30 9000000 0.0001 + OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:05:24 9000000 0.0001 + OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:05:18 9000000 0.0001 OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
16:05:18 9000000 0.0001 - OTCEQ_NBB T (F)
 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
F vs. SF?
 
Posted by Aleks on :
 
hahahahah

I remember banging my head because I invested in CNES and CNES is more than double the price of QBID now, hahahhah


GO CNES!!!!!!!!
 
Posted by mydream1 on :
 
All our long holders help make this network sucess.But Frank made our death. [Frown]
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
codes can also be used in combination (SF)

(F) Informational
(S) Out of sequence


quote:
Originally posted by Esteban99:
F vs. SF?


 
Posted by manfromjax on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
Man, this really sux! Something is really, really wrong with this picture.

QBID closes .0001
MLON closes .0003

TCPI closes 0.0012

Hell, this is not even a company anymore, just a old stock symbol. It went bankrupt years ago but for some reason its symbol still trades.
 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
So are (F) real trades?
 
Posted by mydream1 on :
 
Did anyone call SEC to check A/S recently?Did it already to more than 100Billions?Thanks.
 
Posted by Team Sleep on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by manfromjax:
quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
Man, this really sux! Something is really, really wrong with this picture.

QBID closes .0001
MLON closes .0003

TCPI closes 0.0012

Hell, this is not even a company anymore, just a old stock symbol. It went bankrupt years ago but for some reason its symbol still trades.

There's still a bunch of 'tards that trade Calpine and SYEV (SYEV's CEO reportedly committed suicide years ago and the company went bankrupt)
 
Posted by LUCKYB on :
 
I guess we have'nt heard from CA yet, so be on the lookout for a ransom note, but don't pay any money for Frank!!
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
This is merely a technique of Frank and his legal council displaying their integrity.
Hasn't anybody ever seen the movie with Jim Carey? Very dependable up and up team of guys. When you're in fairyland.
 
Posted by justplayin on :
 
It is indeed a sorry day when Q closes in the same league as PRRM [Frown]

Anybody have any guesses as to why we continue to go lower???
 
Posted by CHIMAN34 on :
 
Ok Penny, my bad, sorry.
I know you said they may not have the meeting, that they weren't sure still. I thought you mentioned that maybe Frank wanted them to be there the night before, which might have meant that there would be an early meeting.
If I got that wrong sorry. Maybe someone else mentioned it.

Dave
 
Posted by CHIMAN34 on :
 
.0001, haven't seen that in a long time. The day that we may have a couple of our guys out there and this goes .0001. Comon, this is a freaken joke.

Dave
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
I know they might not be able to tell us anything if they did have the meeting. But I will be at least a little bit relieved if the meeting at least happened!

It would be nice to get real info though.
 
Posted by 4Tune4Me on :
 
More like 350 million +/- after hours...
 
Posted by 4Tune4Me on :
 
365 million to be exact....
 
Posted by dollar on :
 
didn't frank say in the last conf call he wouldn't raise the os w/o a sharehold vote...and that he would sustain from voting?
 
Posted by Pennies to Dollars on :
 
Wow, this sucks. What's worse is that one year ago I was telling my friends and loved ones about how great this company was. I remember telling them about the product we had here and how our CEO really seemed to care a lot about investors. Now, I sit here a year later and regret ever standing up for Frank when a basher came along. There is absolutely no reason why we should be sitting at .0001 right now. For now, I am going to accept my loss and learn from my mistake. I know that I will never invest in a Pink Sheet stock again. I will check back to see what Doctoall and Imakmony have to say, but I think it's time for me to give up on this thing until we get better news. I have been checking QBID once a day, five days a week for the past year only to see more of my hard earned money go down the drain. I'm not selling, but I'm not going to care about it anymore. I accepted the risks and I'm paying for it now. We hold these truths to be self-evident: This stock has been diluted to death and Frank does not care.

Doctoall, Imakmony, Jennifer, Penny Trader, Bottomliner, Rich, whiznock, Ric (if you're still out there), lilpennypincher, FatherOfTwo, firefly, and everyone else... It has been a pleasure joining you in conversation about our investment, but until we get an audit or some better news from Frank, I'm going to sit out on the sideline. I'm not saying goodbye, because I will be back if there is movement in the PPS, but it's not worth checking up on this thing anymore because we all know what's going on. So, good luck everyone.

Hoping for better days to come,
-PTD
 
Posted by manfromjax on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by dollar:
didn't frank say in the last conf call he wouldn't raise the os w/o a sharehold vote...and that he would sustain from voting?

Frank said a lots of things... he wouldn't let the pps go no lower, that he would get shareholder approval on issuing more shares, DVD, Audit and that QBID was worth billions. But as of this none of thi has come true and QBID is only worth 10 mill.

So, at this point we are at Franks mercy, the company value is basically worthless.
 
Posted by bbsocmicaa on :
 
How many effs in shareholders vote?
There is no f in shareholders vote.
Thanks Frank. I hope the meeting today can prove me wrong.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Come on post man I am ready to file.
 
Posted by Rich735 on :
 
Hey PTD, I am pretty much sitting on the sidelines too. I still own 6 million shares,down 12K and waiting for a miracle.

I sure hope Doc and Imak have the meeting tonight. Hopefully someone will keep us posted.

I don't know what will turn this stock around, I no longer believe Frank. Example-emergency meeting to raise the pps.Then .0007 now .0001 Nice Job CEO!!!

Anyway I hope Frank continues building this "Gay Empire" then sells it for 3-10 Bil!! Then I might be happy again!!

Until then.Good health to all my QBID Family!

Rich
 
Posted by mydream1 on :
 
We believed a NONE-credit CEO.This is our fault.I lost 3k$ in this scam.But still hold it.
 
Posted by mydream1 on :
 
Sorry,not 3k.It's 30k$. [Frown] ( Crying....
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by manfromjax:
QBID is now only valued at 10 million $$. Not much is it?

mfj
I understand what you are saying ... but PPS doesn't determine a company's value. It just indicates what people are willing to risk on the stock at this point in time. And with all the uncertainty lately ... and today especially ... there apparently was enough fear to cause some sales at .0001.

What the longterm shareholders have to determine is what this company is really worth, and for that we need audited asset value, share count, customer base, etc. But until we hear from Frank, either via a PR or through Doc/imak, "guessing" about what is going on is just an exercise in futility.

At this point, I won't preach "positivity", but I will recommend "objectivity", since none of us knows which way this is going to turn out. And we may get some of this needed information very soon.

Doc/imak may be turning on their computers at this very second ... [Smile]
 
Posted by mydream1 on :
 
I feel TMM must meet some critical issue.They rise A/S in very short time. And dilution in so low price. I worried they will R/S very soon,otherwise they will not dump too many shares in this PPS.
Just my personal opnion.
 
Posted by mydream1 on :
 
Maybe they run out of money. If no cash,they will apply bankruptcy very soon.
We can not always sleep in dream. we need to face the fact. [Frown]
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Pennies to Dollars:
... I will check back to see what Doctoall and Imakmony have to say, but I think it's time for me to give up on this thing until we get better news ... I'm going to sit out on the sideline. I'm not saying goodbye, because I will be back if there is movement in the PPS, but it's not worth checking up on this thing anymore because we all know what's going on. So, good luck everyone. -PTD

I understand, PTD. Good luck to you too. Hope we hear something tonight that will make us all happier. [Smile]
 
Posted by manfromjax on :
 
Bottomliner..I agree about what determines the value of a company. I was just refering to the sharevalue. Even though I (we) are down BIG time, I still (got to believe) that for some insane and unjustifiable reason, Q-TV will make it. I said Q-TV, not QBID. As I said before, is it with the current shareholders? Now, until we see the books and the balance sheet we will never know. When we do see the books, now that Frank said the shareholders own 100% of QBID, and it shows no Debt and a good subscription base, then we will just have to wait for a long time to really make any money. But if the books shows a lots of DEBT, then we probably can kiss our asses good bye as far as owning QBID.

Just MHO
 
Posted by Wangdo on :
 
for what it's worth.. i just called burbank and it took the third person(not sure of his name..Evan) i talked to, to answer my question.

doc and imak were there today and they have left for the day.

he did say that they met with Randy but not frank, and they were there for quite sometime.

patience..patience..patience
 
Posted by manfromjax on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mydream1:
I feel TMM must meet some critical issue.They rise A/S in very short time. And dilution in so low price. I worried they will R/S very soon,otherwise they will not dump too many shares in this PPS.
Just my personal opnion.

I can almost guarantee that there will be a reverse split at some point for QBID IF it ever wants to be a considered a 'serious' stock investment for the real "stock" market. I just don't see how a company with 100B can be seen as a serious. Exxon only has 6.2B O/S.

You do not have to fear a R/S..IF the books are clean and we have no DEBT. QBID is ONLY a pink sheet stock, so NO ONE is looking at us. So, QBID may do a stock R/S , flounder around for awhile. But IF QBID can GROW it subscription base and NOT take on to much DEBT in the process, and show a profit in the long run. No one will remember a R/S a year or two from now.

I know that is a lots of IF's.. I don't particularly want to have to wait a year or two, but that is probably what we are going to have to do.

We just need to see those Books...

Again, this is just MHO.
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Wangdo:
for what it's worth ... doc and imak were there today and met with Randy but not frank.

Wangdo
Thanks for the update. At least something happened ... now we continue to wait.
 
Posted by Wangdo on :
 
No problemo [Big Grin]

quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by Wangdo:
for what it's worth ... doc and imak were there today and met with Randy but not frank.

Wangdo
Thanks for the update. At least something happened ... now we continue to wait.


 
Posted by Ligge on :
 
Thanks Wangdo! I am sure they will update us in whatever way they can later tonight or tomorrow.
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
doc imake are you out there?
 
Posted by Hutch on :
 
Well, I sure am wanting to hear from doc and imak even if they can not talk about everything the only words I need to see are "I am keeping all my shares or I am getting out as soon as possible" this is what I am wondering. I would trust doc and imak if they said either one it would make my decision a lot easier.
 
Posted by Sam1959 on :
 
Frank has recently put out a PR stating that “Triangle Multi-Media common shareholders control one hundred percent of Q Television Network”. Does that mean that Frank never converted his common shares to preferred shares?

[Confused]
 
Posted by Rich735 on :
 
Thanks for calling Wangdo(I have already given you 5 stars...LOL)
 
Posted by Wangdo on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Rich735:
Thanks for calling Wangdo(I have already given you 5 stars...LOL)

right back at ya [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Wangdo on :
 
BL PM
 
Posted by Rich735 on :
 
I will be by my computer waiting on imakmony and doc until I fall asleep on the keyboard. So if you see a post that looks like

akjfqoa;ruzrjiasdil;ffp auh qer ghk af dl;sdhkl hartal fhs d sdf

from me,you will know what is going on!!! LOL
 
Posted by ptrs30 on :
 
For the R/S, it all depends on the actual reasons behind it. If the company is making a profit and does not need to dump shares anymore, then a R/S makes sense, as it lessens the O/S and raises the share price accordingly.

There are investors who do not buy a stock unless it has a minimum price of $5.00. I know of companies who have done a R/S just to make their stock price go above $5 to attract those kind of investors and institutions.

Audited financials will show all those and more.

Hopefully Doc and Imak have some news for us.

Good luck to us all

Peter
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
well folks another day another downtick anyone putting in bids for .0001?

bottomliner it is hard to maintain op syndrom right now but i have to say i aint selling no matter how good or bad the news is from doc and imak. im in this for the long haul i beleive it will succeed. time will tell of course but nobody ever said it was illegal to be a qbidiot so that just what im gonna do.

im long im strong and im holding all 26 million ................either a yacht or a pyschologist please hehe.
 
Posted by laintbad on :
 
somebody please put me out of my misery please. I"m glad that we could see light at the end of the tunnel now. Its pretty much clear now that stock has hit rock bottom. I don't know what is worse.. the pps going down or logging into my account to see this stock go down consistently for the last 18 months!

Its all over and I have accepted defeat. It was nice kowing you all. One thing I learnt from the pink sheet investment is when you are up a couple of ticks take it and run. Ofcourse the sad part is I was never up once on this stock to exit my position.

GOOD LUCK EVERYONE ON YOUR OTHER INVESTMENTS!

Take care.
 
Posted by Ad astra on :
 
[QUOTE]Originally posted by noah129:
[QB] well folks another day another downtick anyone putting in bids for .0001?

I've got an order in for 10M *.0001. Hasnt been filled for 2 days. Don't know if it will. Any one else?
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by noah129:
... it is hard to maintain op syndrom right now but i have to say i aint selling no matter how good or bad the news is from doc and imak.

noah
For now, being objective is a lot easier than being positive ... so let's shoot for that. Until we get information from Frank via a PR or via Doc/imak, we cannot know if we are happier or sadder than we were yesterday. So why is everyone so down tonight? Let's wait for facts before we give up.

Some people are posting total despair tonight. But the only thing that is different today is that we closed at .0001 ... and that just means .0001 was the last trade of the day. It doesn't mean the PPS "can never" rise again.

I said I wouldn't preach "positivity" today. So instead, let's just look at this realistically. It appears to me that people should sell:
-at .0001 only if they believe the stock will soon quit trading.
-at .0002 only if they just want to "end their misery" and walk away.
-at .0003 only if they've been able to get some shares at .0002.
-at .0003+ only if they need money to pay off their bookie ... because when Q hits .0003, it might finally be the turnaround we've all been waiting for.

DISCLAIMER: This is just my opinion, so don't take any actions based on my comments.
 
Posted by Doctoall on :
 
So to begin with you all know that I along with others made a visit to "Q" last fall. So getting another tour today was a pleasant adventure.

Compared to last fall, there are twice as many staff there, all very busy and proud to be a part of "Q". The place is a buzz, they have added 3-4 new sets for upcoming shows (no names mentioned) yet for those shows.

The place appears to be running more smoothly. On my last tour I did not get to visit the suites upstairs, but today I did. Geez state of the art, the equip must be worth a bundle.

It is my understanding that Richard Brown will be located in Burbank in approx 3 weeks and will operate out of Burbank.

Spend some time talking with Steve Kmetko and his crew, very impresive. Spend time talking with Scott Withers, Honey Labrador.

There was a meeting today at "Q" with the Reps from the Gay Games and the production crew.

I promise that I will get as much information out as I can, just very tired tonight, although I arrived in Burbank yesterday at 430PM I did not get to bed until after 230AM this morning and up again at 600AM this morning. [Big Grin]

[ January 12, 2006, 22:48: Message edited by: Doctoall ]
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
Bottomliner, id like to introduce you to my lawyer, i feel your predictions are without warrent, so heres yours.

 -
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
Glad to hear yours and monkeys travels were both safe and productive, welcome back. And i think i can speak for all of us when i say, get some rest and we look forward to your comments and updates on the morrow. Thanks doc

quote:
Originally posted by Doctoall:
So to begin with you all know that I along with others made a visit to "Q" last fall. So getting another tour today was a pleasant adventure.

Compared to last fall, there are twice as many staff there, all very busy and proud to be a part of "Q". The place is a buzz, they have added 3-4 new sets for upcoming shows (no names mentioned) yet for those shows.

The place appears to be running more smoothly. On my last tour I did not get to visit the suites upstairs, but today I did. Geez state of the art, the equip must be worth a bundle.

It is my understanding that Richard Brown will be located in Burbank in approx 3 weeks and will operate out of Burbank.

Spend some time talking with Steve Kmetko and his crew, very impresive. Spend time talking with Scott Withers, Honey Labrador.

There was a meeting today at "Q" with the Reps from the Gay Games and the production crew.

I promise that I will get as much information out as I can, just very tired tonight, although I arrived in Burbank yesterday at 430PM I did not get to bed until after 230AM this morning and up again at 600AM this morning.


 
Posted by Sam1959 on :
 
B/L:
Thanks for that dose of what I consider to be good solid reasoning.

Hitting .0001 and seeing the results in my account was not pleasant, and I’m sure others feel the same way. Your positive thoughts are appreciated.
[Smile]
 
Posted by one2watchny on :
 
WHY DOEsN't eVeryone just look at this as an OPPOrtunity to aVG. DOwn.....I'm Sure Considerably for most still here.....if you're down 10-30K whats another $Grand....if you have a million * .015 and buy 5 million now....you''ll break even at .00266666666666666667! [Wink]
 
Posted by Ligge on :
 
Welcome back Doc! Glad you had a safe trip. I look forward to the update later.

NOW GO TO BED!

:0
 
Posted by one2watchny on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Doctoall:
So to begin with you all know that I along with others made a visit to "Q" last fall. So getting another tour today was a pleasant adventure.

Compared to last fall, there are twice as many staff there, all very busy and proud to be a part of "Q". The place is a buzz, they have added 3-4 new sets for upcoming shows (no names mentioned) yet for those shows.

The place appears to be running more smoothly. On my last tour I did not get to visit the suites upstairs, but today I did. Geez state of the art, the equip must be worth a bundle.

It is my understanding that Richard Brown will be located in Burbank in approx 3 weeks and will operate out of Burbank.

Spend some time talking with Steve Kmetko and his crew, very impresive. Spend time talking with Scott Withers, Honey Labrador.

There was a meeting today at "Q" with the Reps from the Gay Games and the production crew.

I promise that I will get as much information out as I can, just very tired tonight, although I arrived in Burbank yesterday at 430PM I did not get to bed until after 230AM this morning and up again at 600AM this morning.

Will you have Sweet Dreams.....Nice work
 
Posted by Sam1959 on :
 
Thanks for the post Doc. Looking forward to more info when you have had some rest.

Your effort is much appreciated. [Smile]
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
You guys rock!
Thanks for doing that. I look forward to hearing about it!!
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
Bottomliner, id like to introduce you to my lawyer, i feel your predictions are without warrent, so heres yours.

 -

Come on, MM. We all know that's you in disguise. Did you think the shades would fool us? By the way, nice suit. I have one just like it. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 

 
Posted by Doctoall on :
 
Subs: I know that there are many of you that think as soon as the open a new carrier market area that the money comes flowing in. I have had some suspicions about that for a long time. Well, just because a new market opens up, the money does not come rushing in.

First of all, "Q" has to get a carrier to take their programming, then the carrier has an intro period in the new area. "Q" has to pay for promos and if the carrier charges customers for programming it is not likely that "Q" sees any of the money that the carriers call set up fees.

So while "Q" has to provide the programming for trial, the carrier gets new subs and build a base for the station. Depending on the carrier agreement, the sub money starts to flow to "Q" after a 90 day trial. So folks guess what it takes money to create new programming and to keep it going.

As far as carriers are concerned both Carol Hinnant and Cory are very busy making that happen. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Doctoall:
So to begin with you all know that I along with others made a visit to "Q" last fall. So getting another tour today was a pleasant adventure.

Sleep well, Doc ... and you too, imak.

No matter what you found out, no matter what you didn't find out ... we owe you both a round of applause for your time and efforts. And when we get to Vegas, you may not see a sober moment because everyone owes you many rounds of drinks. [Smile] [Cool]
 
Posted by kaos on :
 
doctor...sorry to do this but one simple request...a smile or a frown....what do you think
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
woops..sorry Doc, didn't know you were back.
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
Very nice at the Q, DOC Beat me home.
 
Posted by kaos on :
 
guys again sorry for this ..but the antisipation is way to much here...just a smile or a frown before tommorow....
 
Posted by kaos on :
 
[Roll Eyes] [Roll Eyes] [Roll Eyes] [Roll Eyes]
 
Posted by zippycal on :
 
Are you serious ? After all this time of waiting what's another 12 hours ? Let the man get some sleep and applaud his effort !!
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
Very nice at the Q, DOC Beat me home.

Just told Doc thanks ... but I want to make sure you know we appreciate your time and efforts also, no matter what you found out.

Now get some rest. You have a busy day on the board tomorrow ... right???? [Big Grin]
 
Posted by kaos on :
 
hey..i was the only one with a pair to ask...you know you were all thinking the same thing... [Roll Eyes]
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
Bottomliner, id like to introduce you to my lawyer, i feel your predictions are without warrent, so heres yours.

 -

Come on, MM. We all know that's you in disguise. Did you think the shades would fool us? By the way, nice suit. I have one just like it. [Big Grin]
Crap i thought the Briefcase and the oversized shoes would have hidden me away well enough, DOHETH i say. However, you still got served

 -
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
Imakmony, welcome back. I hope the trip was worth it.
From what little Doc has said so far, it seems we need to convince Frank not to sell shares so cheap.
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 

 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
OK, bed time for you too. Its late and you have to get up for school in the morning.

quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
Bottomliner, id like to introduce you to my lawyer, i feel your predictions are without warrent, so heres yours.

 -

Come on, MM. We all know that's you in disguise. Did you think the shades would fool us? By the way, nice suit. I have one just like it. [Big Grin]
Crap i thought the Briefcase and the oversized shoes would have hidden me away well enough, DOHETH i say. However, you still got served

 -


 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by bbsocmicaa:
How many effs in shareholders vote?
There is no f in shareholders vote.
Thanks Frank. I hope the meeting today can prove me wrong.

Honestly, what? What are you talking about?
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
LOL dig, school dosent start till tuesday, we already covered that subject, but thanks for the mummy speech.
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
looking for the next big tv network
bkmp?, obtv?, qbid??
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
Thanks Doc and Imakemoney for your trip today. I hope you got to look at what you asked to see.

no matter what they found, i refuse to sell at these levels.

im here till they take my shares away or i make a proffit.

hopefully Doc will be able to tell us we are in good or bad shape, but im not counting on it.

obviously they are not able to tell us anymore then what they already have, so lets not pressure them for info that they can not give out.

If they can tell us anything they will.

do not pester them.

Rod
 
Posted by Bigrod40 on :
 
COMENTS PLEASE!!

HUMM!! could the SEC now make Frank & QBID File with the SEC, it now does look that way since Franks last PR now says QBID has as of now some $700 Million in assets. NO?? YES?? now read this people!
By SEC LAWS, QBID MUST FILE with the SEC NOW !!!!

Posted by: monergy
In reply to: None
Date:1/12/2006 6:52:28 PM
Post #of 208680

Here's the letter--copy it and send it!!

To whom this may concern.

I am a shareholder in a company named Triangle Multi Media which trades on the Pink Sheets SYMBOL: QBID. Recently, the company has put out PR's that make claim to having assets above and beyond 10 million dollars and I am reasonably sure that they have well over 500 shareholders.

According to your website, any company that has over 10 million in assets and over 500 shareholders is suppose to file with the SEC.

As a shareholder I believe that there has been some fraudulant activity in the trading of their shares. I would like the SEC to take notice of this situation and act upon it.

Thank You for Your Time,

Sincerely,

http://www.sec.gov/divisions/enforce/internetenforce.htm
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
I thought maybe a drill. Just to see if you can do it. The discipline will do you a lot of good. [Wink]


quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
LOL dig, school dosent start till tuesday, we already covered that subject, but thanks for the mummy speech.


 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by kaos:
hey..i was the only one with a pair to ask...you know you were all thinking the same thing... [Roll Eyes]

kaos
You're right about that ... we're all as giddy as kids on Christmas Eve. But I was taught that anticipation is the best part of any surprise (and my honeymoon proved it [Big Grin] ), so let's let Doc and imak get some rest so they can compose their thoughts with clear minds.

Based on their limited comments so far, I think they had a good time, were significantly impressed with Q's facilities and staff, and appear to be willing to share what they learned.

And I didn't detect any signs of depression or despair: neither one ever said "woe is me, woe is me, I think I'll kill myself" and that's a pretty positive indication of good news to come. [Big Grin]

Anyway ... see you all tomorrow. [Smile]
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
Thanks Doc and Imak... Thanks for taking the time to get this meeting and then go out there...
 
Posted by kaos on :
 
as usual bl you are 100% right...sorry guy..but had to try...enjoy your night sleep
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
What are we suppose to be doing here? We want them to file with the sec and nail them for fraud? Or just file?
I'm not ready for them to get tied up in court right now, yet. [Confused]


quote:
Originally posted by Bigrod40:
COMENTS PLEASE!!

HUMM!! could the SEC now make Frank & QBID File with the SEC, it now does look that way since Franks last PR now says QBID has as of now some $700 Million in assets. NO?? YES?? now read this people!
By SEC LAWS, QBID MUST FILE with the SEC NOW !!!!

Posted by: monergy
In reply to: None
Date:1/12/2006 6:52:28 PM
Post #of 208680

Here's the letter--copy it and send it!!

To whom this may concern.

I am a shareholder in a company named Triangle Multi Media which trades on the Pink Sheets SYMBOL: QBID. Recently, the company has put out PR's that make claim to having assets above and beyond 10 million dollars and I am reasonably sure that they have well over 500 shareholders.

According to your website, any company that has over 10 million in assets and over 500 shareholders is suppose to file with the SEC.

As a shareholder I believe that there has been some fraudulant activity in the trading of their shares. I would like the SEC to take notice of this situation and act upon it.

Thank You for Your Time,

Sincerely,

http://www.sec.gov/divisions/enforce/internetenforce.htm


 
Posted by Sam1959 on :
 
Good idea BigRod. Let's wait to see what Doc and Imak have to say before we start sending letters to the SEC.
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
Thats not the college spirit, i thought i was suppose to be getting drunk till the wee hours in the am. Why do i got to be a solid upstanding citizen while you guys encourage MJM to be corrupt [Frown] .. thats not riiiiight....

quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
I thought maybe a drill. Just to see if you can do it. The discipline will do you a lot of good. [Wink]


quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
LOL dig, school dosent start till tuesday, we already covered that subject, but thanks for the mummy speech.



 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
You don't need those terrible rotten hangovers that come with those kind of nights. If you're like me after 30-40 years you'll realize it just isn't worth it. [Wink]

quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
Thats not the college spirit, i thought i was suppose to be getting drunk till the wee hours in the am. Why do i got to be a solid upstanding citizen while you guys encourage MJM to be corrupt [Frown] .. thats not riiiiight....

quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
I thought maybe a drill. Just to see if you can do it. The discipline will do you a lot of good. [Wink]


quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
LOL dig, school dosent start till tuesday, we already covered that subject, but thanks for the mummy speech.




 
Posted by Sam1959 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
Very nice at the Q, DOC Beat me home.

Thanks for making the trip. Looking forward to hearing your assessment of the situation.
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
You let me decide wether it was worth it or not.. MUMMY!!!!!!
 -

quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
You don't need those terrible rotten hangovers that come with those kind of nights. If you're like me after 30-40 years you'll realize it just isn't worth it. [Wink]

quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
Thats not the college spirit, i thought i was suppose to be getting drunk till the wee hours in the am. Why do i got to be a solid upstanding citizen while you guys encourage MJM to be corrupt [Frown] .. thats not riiiiight....

quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
I thought maybe a drill. Just to see if you can do it. The discipline will do you a lot of good. [Wink]


quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
LOL dig, school dosent start till tuesday, we already covered that subject, but thanks for the mummy speech.





 
Posted by Deg's wife on :
 
hmmmmmmmmm....I cleaned up dishes 5 times tonight, did 10 loads of clothes.....vacuumed all carpets 3 times....washed and groomed the dog twice....made 12 red velvet cakes....cleaned the walls in all 8 rooms....did latreen(sp)duty for the whole neighborhood [Big Grin] . I think I am tired. Will get a good night's sleep so I can wake up with more anticipation than what I had all evening. Can't wait for Doc and Imak to get a full night's rest so they can fill us in with what they can tell us. Take care all.....It's XANAX time...see you all in the morning
 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
well i have to say just the two posts that doc made seems sorta positive. he didnt seem down at all so i have to assume things are eh ok at the q.

i am looking forward to all that they have to share and im also looking forward to a 300% rise in qbid asap. can we get a close of .0004 please. i think that would be a good chance for all the week hands to exit the q and those that are faithfully long continue holding through the ups and downs until we see otcbb or amex and a share price over a penny.

best of luck to all qbidians and please if anyone is able to get a fill in at .0001 please post im just curious if the mm's will fill those. if they are filling at .0001 that is when i truly will be scared.

if even half of what frank says is true we should be sitting at what i guess would be a conservative guesstimate of .003. this is all my humble opinion but if it is true and in the weeks to months ahead we do reach those levels then those that took the oppurtunity to buy at .0002 would be holding a 15 bagger not to shabby. ok i think i have overdosed on obnoxiously positive vibes for the night so im checkking out .

good luck qbidians and qbidiots. our day may just come.
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
Very nice at the Q, DOC Beat me home.

I owe you many rounds my friend. You have no idea how much I appreciate all that you have done.
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by kaos:
as usual bl you are 100% right...sorry guy..but had to try...enjoy your night sleep

You are both right LOL We ARE all thinking it Kaos, but it was so above and beyond the call for them to do this that we can let em slide for a little while! [Wink]
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
You know Boss HossTrader, if it was you i would demand the information as soon as you dragged your sorry carcuse into your home. But thats only towards you. Doc and monkey, well they deserve a break. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
You know Boss HossTrader, if it was you i would demand the information as soon as you dragged your sorry carcuse into your home. But thats only towards you. Doc and monkey, well they deserve a break. [Big Grin]

LMAO Where's the love?
 
Posted by one2watchny on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
You know Boss HossTrader, if it was you i would demand the information as soon as you dragged your sorry carcuse into your home. But thats only towards you. Doc and monkey, well they deserve a break. [Big Grin]

I personally think they cannot disclose too much or they will be liable....or there's not much to be excited about short term; they would'nt be able to sleep if there is exciting news.Just watching now....and excited!
I hope the Former rather the latter. [Razz]
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by one2watchny:
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
You know Boss HossTrader, if it was you i would demand the information as soon as you dragged your sorry carcuse into your home. But thats only towards you. Doc and monkey, well they deserve a break. [Big Grin]

I personally think they cannot disclose too much or they will be liable....or there's not much to be excited about short term; they would'nt be able to sleep if there is exciting news.Just watching now....and excited!
I hope the Former rather the latter. [Razz]

Now now no negative attitudes, put on a happy face [Smile]
 -
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
sorry about this, i got a big thunder storm rolling in and i dont want to lose any of my systems, so you wont see any of my images until the am, since i use my own bandwidth to host them. I appologize but ill have the happy faces up when i roll out of bed [Smile]
 
Posted by one2watchny on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
quote:
Originally posted by one2watchny:
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
You know Boss HossTrader, if it was you i would demand the information as soon as you dragged your sorry carcuse into your home. But thats only towards you. Doc and monkey, well they deserve a break. [Big Grin]

I personally think they cannot disclose too much or they will be liable....or there's not much to be excited about short term; they would'nt be able to sleep if there is exciting news.Just watching now....and excited!
I hope the Former rather the latter. [Razz]

Now now no negative attitudes, put on a happy face [Smile]
 -

whatcha talkin bout .......that was being optimistic....see [Big Grin] [Big Grin] [Big Grin] guess i shouldn't had thought out loud [Eek!]
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
Well, as of 1:25 am EST the QTV website is down.

Hmmmm Maybe they packed up and moved after Monkey and Doc left [Embarrassed]
 
Posted by bige2533 on :
 
Guess we don't have anything to lose. Can't sell for any lower...

quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
Thanks Doc and Imakemoney for your trip today. I hope you got to look at what you asked to see.

no matter what they found, i refuse to sell at these levels.

im here till they take my shares away or i make a proffit.

hopefully Doc will be able to tell us we are in good or bad shape, but im not counting on it.

obviously they are not able to tell us anymore then what they already have, so lets not pressure them for info that they can not give out.

If they can tell us anything they will.

do not pester them.

Rod


 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
DotNetNuke Upgrade Error
The Assembly Version ( [ASSEMBLYVERSION] ) does not match the Database Version ( [DATABASEVERSION] )

ERROR: Could not connect to database.

SQL Server does not exist or access denied.
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
That's the error you get when you try to get to the Q website... Now, there's one reason for that-->

Their servers are down...

Now, this could be for several reasons--

1) Power outage
2) Servers are broken (fried hard drive, etc.)
3) Connection to their backbone/ISP is down
OR (what I'm hoping for)

4) New website

We are long overdue... and Q needs a major overhaul... so we shall see...
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
Damn it, Damn it, Damn it...

I spoke five seconds too soon...

The old ****ty website is back up and running... oh well...
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
Maybe MM is hosting it and it went down when he shut down.

hmmmmmmmmmmm


na i doubt it lol

Rod

quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
Well, as of 1:25 am EST the QTV website is down.

Hmmmm Maybe they packed up and moved after Monkey and Doc left [Embarrassed]


 
Posted by Wangdo on :
 
Thanks imak and doc, glad you had a safe trip.

welcome back
 
Posted by Wangdo on :
 
TRISKAIDEKAPHOBIA

Happy Friday the 13th everybody [Big Grin]

 -
 
Posted by manfromjax on :
 
Hopefully, when Doc and Ima write some more, it might counteract the effect of Friday 13th on us poor sad QBID owners... [Frown]
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
Thanks Doc and Imakemoney for your trip today. I hope you got to look at what you asked to see.

no matter what they found, i refuse to sell at these levels.

im here till they take my shares away or i make a proffit.

hopefully Doc will be able to tell us we are in good or bad shape, but im not counting on it.

obviously they are not able to tell us anymore then what they already have, so lets not pressure them for info that they can not give out.

If they can tell us anything they will.

do not pester them.

Rod

I second that. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
"One small step for SEC...one giant leap for stockholders." [Big Grin]


WASHINGTON, Jan. 10 - Outlining the details of his first major initiative, Christopher Cox, the new head of the Securities and Exchange Commission, said that next week the agency would propose the most extensive overhaul since 1992 of the way companies disclose compensation to senior executives and directors.

"The marketplace for executive compensation has proceeded apace in the intervening decade and a half and the results have been an increasing amount of executive compensation that is escaping disclosure," Mr. Cox told a group of reporters over lunch at the agency's headquarters.

Once adopted, the new rules would provide considerable assistance to investors, who are often unable to glean from corporate filings the total compensation of top executives. But the rules would still fall far short of the ambitious corporate democracy proposals made for many years by stockholders and some lawmakers, including one proposal that would give the investors some say in setting pay scales.

Those proposals have gained little political traction in Washington, even as a growing body of evidence has emerged to suggest that at many companies there is no correlation between executive pay and company performance....
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
By the way...did George Takei ever mention Q on the Howard Stern show? Anyone?
 
Posted by manfromjax on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Doctoall:
.... Well, just because a new market opens up, the money does not come rushing in.

... So folks guess what it takes money to create new programming and to keep it going.

[Big Grin]

Look like Doc said it all right there. We just have to wait and see the Balance Sheet. Nothing more, nothingless. Frank is selling shares to finance the company. But at .0001 he about ran this 'funding option' to the ground.
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by manfromjax:
quote:
Originally posted by Doctoall:
.... Well, just because a new market opens up, the money does not come rushing in.

... So folks guess what it takes money to create new programming and to keep it going.

[Big Grin]

Look like Doc said it all right there. We just have to wait and see the Balance Sheet. Nothing more, nothingless. Frank is selling shares to finance the company. But at .0001 he about ran this 'funding option' to the ground.
Yeah I've mentioned that before. And surely it was on purpose. I just think Frank is got something big in the works of his planning. Something that will be rewarding to all long's over the long term. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by manfromjax on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by QBID'n:
[QUOTE]
... I just think Frank is got something big in the works of his planning. Something that will be rewarding to all long's over the long term. [Big Grin]

Well, good or bad.. that is all we have at this point in time... FRANK [Confused]
 
Posted by Ad astra on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Bigrod40:
COMENTS PLEASE!!

HUMM!! could the SEC now make Frank & QBID File with the SEC, it now does look that way since Franks last PR now says QBID has as of now some $700 Million in assets. NO?? YES?? now read this people!
By SEC LAWS, QBID MUST FILE with the SEC NOW !!!!

Posted by: monergy
In reply to: None
Date:1/12/2006 6:52:28 PM
Post #of 208680

Here's the letter--copy it and send it!!

To whom this may concern.

I am a shareholder in a company named Triangle Multi Media which trades on the Pink Sheets SYMBOL: QBID. Recently, the company has put out PR's that make claim to having assets above and beyond 10 million dollars and I am reasonably sure that they have well over 500 shareholders.

According to your website, any company that has over 10 million in assets and over 500 shareholders is suppose to file with the SEC.

As a shareholder I believe that there has been some fraudulant activity in the trading of their shares. I would like the SEC to take notice of this situation and act upon it.

Thank You for Your Time,

Sincerely,

http://www.sec.gov/divisions/enforce/internetenforce.htm

------------------

This is just another waste of time. No, TMM DOES NOT HAVE TO FILE reports to the SEC. If I undestand it correctly, pinky-listed issuers aren't required to register securities with the SEC OR be current in their reporting requirements to be quoted on the Pink Sheets.

Anyone else want to chime in?
 
Posted by one2watchny on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by one2watchny:
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
You know Boss HossTrader, if it was you i would demand the information as soon as you dragged your sorry carcuse into your home. But thats only towards you. Doc and monkey, well they deserve a break. [Big Grin]

I personally think they cannot disclose too much or they will be liable....or there's not much to be excited about short term; they would'nt be able to sleep if there is exciting news.Just watching now....and excited!
I hope the Former rather the latter. [Razz]

Suppose to be taking a pre-vacation but .............................................have to see if they are going to release a nice fat juicy Pr.......
[Big Grin]
 
Posted by Ligge on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
Very nice at the Q, DOC Beat me home.

Welcome back!
 
Posted by one2watchny on :
 
With CHERRIES ON tOP! [Razz] [Razz] [Razz]
 
Posted by one2watchny on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by one2watchny:
WHY DOEsN't eVeryone just look at this as an OPPOrtunity to aVG. DOwn.....I'm Sure Considerably for most still here.....if you're down 10-30K whats another $Grand....if you have a million * .015 and buy 5 million now....you''ll break even at .00266666666666666667! [Wink]

bump
 
Posted by one2watchny on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ad astra:
quote:
Originally posted by Bigrod40:
COMENTS PLEASE!!

HUMM!! could the SEC now make Frank & QBID File with the SEC, it now does look that way since Franks last PR now says QBID has as of now some $700 Million in assets. NO?? YES?? now read this people!
By SEC LAWS, QBID MUST FILE with the SEC NOW !!!!

Posted by: monergy
In reply to: None
Date:1/12/2006 6:52:28 PM
Post #of 208680

Here's the letter--copy it and send it!!

To whom this may concern.

I am a shareholder in a company named Triangle Multi Media which trades on the Pink Sheets SYMBOL: QBID. Recently, the company has put out PR's that make claim to having assets above and beyond 10 million dollars and I am reasonably sure that they have well over 500 shareholders.

According to your website, any company that has over 10 million in assets and over 500 shareholders is suppose to file with the SEC.

As a shareholder I believe that there has been some fraudulant activity in the trading of their shares. I would like the SEC to take notice of this situation and act upon it.

Thank You for Your Time,

Sincerely,

http://www.sec.gov/divisions/enforce/internetenforce.htm

------------------

This is just another waste of time. No, TMM DOES NOT HAVE TO FILE reports to the SEC. If I undestand it correctly, pinky-listed issuers aren't required to register securities with the SEC OR be current in their reporting requirements to be quoted on the Pink Sheets.

Anyone else want to chime in?

oNLY TIME THE sEc might step in is if the PPS takes off to a quarter......like they halted SSTY(THAT WAS GREAT FOR ME.....in at .0015, 4 days later out at .015) [Big Grin]
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
LET'S MAKE A DEAL
Lots of new queer entertainment deals announced this week. First, Wilderness Media and Sony Music Label have teamed up to launch a new GLBT record label; look for a bigger article on that on AfterEllen.com next week. Then Rosie O'Donnell and Logo announced a new partnership to create a sketch comedy show, and Sandra Bernhard signed a deal with Q Television to co-host 40 episodes of Queer Edge with Jack E. Jett beginning January 16th.

Meanwhile, I made a deal with myself this week to not watch the premiere of the second season of Beauty and the Geek, but I just couldn't help it.

http://www.afterellen.com/column/2006/1/13.html
 
Posted by Ligge on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by QBID'n:
By the way...did George Takei ever mention Q on the Howard Stern show? Anyone?

No, Howard did
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Ligge:
quote:
Originally posted by QBID'n:
By the way...did George Takei ever mention Q on the Howard Stern show? Anyone?

No, Howard did
Yes...I remember him mentioning the "Q"...

But, is it the Sirius radio station or our television network or something else?
 
Posted by Ligge on :
 
He asked George if he was going to be on the new gay station the day it was announced we were being added in California areas. I believe the San Diego announcement day. I kind of have to go with it being us due to that... but who knows.

[ January 13, 2006, 09:02: Message edited by: Ligge ]
 
Posted by manfromjax on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
LET'S MAKE A DEAL
Lots of new queer entertainment deals announced this week. First, Wilderness Media and Sony Music Label have teamed up to launch a new GLBT record label; look for a bigger article on that on AfterEllen.com next week. Then Rosie O'Donnell and Logo announced a new partnership to create a sketch comedy show, and Sandra Bernhard signed a deal with Q Television to co-host 40 episodes of Queer Edge with Jack E. Jett beginning January 16th.

Meanwhile, I made a deal with myself this week to not watch the premiere of the second season of Beauty and the Geek, but I just couldn't help it.

http://www.afterellen.com/column/2006/1/13.html

I guess the real question here is: Are there enough 'queers' to go around to support all the venue? There is a law of 'deminishing returns' or 'over satutation.'
 
Posted by 4Tune4Me on :
 
While everyone may be jumping on the bandwagon, my guess is that the GLBT community will support what they sense truly speaks to them and weed out the networks that just have a hand in their pockets.
 
Posted by ltesprit on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by manfromjax:
You do not have to fear a R/S..IF the books are clean and we have no DEBT. QBID is ONLY a pink sheet stock, so NO ONE is looking at us. So, QBID may do a stock R/S , flounder around for awhile. But IF QBID can GROW it subscription base and NOT take on to much DEBT in the process, and show a profit in the long run. No one will remember a R/S a year or two from now.

That's silly. Debt is not 'bad'. It is one of the only two ways to finance a company. The other way is equity. You prefer Olsen finance operations through issuing more shares?

At this stage in the game, what's important is that we see a credible, full audit that shows appropriate debt, healthy net equity, sizable tangible assets, and cash inflows from subscriptions.
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
Not yet that i have heard. I have been listening.

they have talked about outQ the gay station on Sirius and they have had them on thier show.

I have to admit though i have not heard every word of the show. Im going to be calling in, and asking George about his interview on Qtelevision. see if i can get that conversation going.

rod
quote:
Originally posted by QBID'n:
By the way...did George Takei ever mention Q on the Howard Stern show? Anyone?


 
Posted by manfromjax on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ltesprit:
quote:
Originally posted by manfromjax:
You do not have to fear a R/S..IF the books are clean and we have no DEBT.

That's silly. Debt is not 'bad'. ...
I stand corrected. I should have said: No outstanding debt that straddles QBID and put it at the mercy of creditors... where QBID has to keep looking for money to pay them rather then supporting QBID daily operations.
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
its going to be a bright, bright, bright, bright and sun shiney daaaa aaay.  -
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
Who woke the kids up? They're supposed to be in bed with a hangover.

quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
its going to be a bright, bright, bright, bright and sun shiney daaaa aaay.  -


 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
330M in the first 10 minutes of trading
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
Ohhhh sooo now im suppose to not wake up in time for school, and have a hangover. PFFFFFFF

quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
Who woke the kids up? They're supposed to be in bed with a hangover.

quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
its going to be a bright, bright, bright, bright and sun shiney daaaa aaay. ]



 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
i wonder what our slueths uncovered on their QTN dig for information.

 -
 
Posted by manfromjax on :
 
Well, I guess there is one POSITIVE thing you can say about closing at .0001 yesterday, is that we are now at .0002 up 100% [Smile]
 
Posted by Doctoall on :
 
Good Morning fellow "Qbiddians". Well some of you may have heard that we were asked to sign a non-disclosure agreement at "Q". I need to be very clear on that, the non-disclosure agreement was related to the attending of the Gay Games Production meeting on Thursday.

The planning for the Gay Games is now in high gear and the reps from Chic were in Burbank to attend a planning and production meetings.

There is plenty of buzz around that project and yes Frank did meet with the Execs from the Gay Games in his morning meeting.

I am sure that Imakmony will have some to add to the board about yesterday. I must say that meeting Mike was a pleasure. As for me at this given moment I have every intention of holding my position in QBID.

Long, strong and holding [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Wangdo on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Doctoall:
Good Morning fellow "Qbiddians". Well some of you may have heard that we were asked to sign a non-disclosure agreement at "Q". I need to be very clear on that, the non-disclosure agreement was related to the attending of the Gay Games Production meeting on Thursday.

The planning for the Gay Games is now in high gear and the reps from Chic were in Burbank to attend a planning and production meetings.

There is plenty of buzz around that project and yes Frank did meet with the Execs from the Gay Games in his morning meeting.

I am sure that Imakmony will have some to add to the board about yesterday. I must say that meeting Mike was a pleasure. As for me at this given moment I have every intention of holding my position in QBID.

Long, strong and holding [Big Grin]

AMEN to that [Big Grin] [Big Grin] [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Doctoall on :
 
Anyone getting filled at 0.0001 ?? I know that it will fill at 0.0002 [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Ligge on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Doctoall:
Good Morning fellow "Qbiddians". Well some of you may have heard that we were asked to sign a non-disclosure agreement at "Q". I need to be very clear on that, the non-disclosure agreement was related to the attending of the Gay Games Production meeting on Thursday.

The planning for the Gay Games is now in high gear and the reps from Chic were in Burbank to attend a planning and production meetings.

There is plenty of buzz around that project and yes Frank did meet with the Execs from the Gay Games in his morning meeting.

I am sure that Imakmony will have some to add to the board about yesterday. I must say that meeting Mike was a pleasure. As for me at this given moment I have every intention of holding my position in QBID.

Long, strong and holding [Big Grin]

Sounds like my comment yesterday was right on. I will be holding too. Not like I can get anything for it anyway right now lol

Thanks for all the hard work guys.
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
what has been happening today, for volume and is it a lot of buys at 2 or sells at 1 my waterhouse account is not telling me these things
today.

thanks

Rod
 
Posted by Egor on :
 
Doctoall
Did you get to see the books?
 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Doctoall:
Anyone getting filled at 0.0001 ?? I know that it will fill at 0.0002 [Big Grin]

Haha... did someone just pick up more Q? [Razz]
 
Posted by Sam1959 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by QBID'n:
By the way...did George Takei ever mention Q on the Howard Stern show? Anyone?

I hanen't heard him do it, but I have only listened to the HS show for about 2 hrs total since they went over to Sirius.
 
Posted by Wangdo on :
 
just picked up 2.75 mil more.. still lagging behind noah and hoss
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
<<<<happy dance>>>>

Thanks Doc!
 
Posted by mattbarrett on :
 
Doc tell me something so i can feel alittle better about the 10 million share position im at.
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
Doc thank you for taking the time and effort in what you have been doing with Q. Was it worth it?
DOC, thats it? You heard them planning the gay games? What about the rest of the biz? The last 2 years of vague and deceptive PRS? The Audit we all been screaming for? The concern about the PPS? And on and on?
 
Posted by Wangdo on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
<<<<happy dance>>>>

Thanks Doc!

 -
 
Posted by Doctoall on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
<<<<happy dance>>>>

Thanks Doc!

Guys I am no different than most of you, I first got in on QBID when all the hype was going on, so my average was high, after buying over the last year (not selling when it was at 0.0090) I have a lower average. I will hold and take my chances with this stock. This is a real company and the future should be very bright.

So yes Doc is doing the happy dance [Big Grin] Anyone else want to dance?
 
Posted by mattbarrett on :
 
exactly????
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
Doc thank you for taking the time and effort in what you have been doing with Q. Was it worth it?
DOC, thats it? You heard them planning the gay games? What about the rest of the biz? The last 2 years of vague and deceptive PRS? The Audit we all been screaming for? The concern about the PPS? And on and on?

Give him a minute!! He might be in the middle of typing a war and peace sized post about the trip!! Or he might have had to take a leak! [Big Grin]
 
Posted by ltesprit on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Doctoall:
Anyone getting filled at 0.0001 ?? I know that it will fill at 0.0002 [Big Grin]

Doc, thanks to you and Imak for making that trip. Every effort helps.

From your posts though it appears that you did not get the chance to see the audit or meet with management and take them to task for the confusion and uncertainty surround our investment. Did they bait-and-switch you on your arrival?
 
Posted by mattbarrett on :
 
DOC a coulpe question.

any chance of a R/S
Where the Audit
What is going on with frank
What up with the lawsuit
When are we going to see some subscription money roll in.
Why did Frank increase float
 
Posted by mattbarrett on :
 
mary heartman?
 
Posted by Wangdo on :
 
you all need to read between the lines.

Doc and Imak did the DD and are satisfied with their decision to hold.

enough said
 
Posted by Sam1959 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
quote:
Originally posted by Ligge:
quote:
Originally posted by QBID'n:
By the way...did George Takei ever mention Q on the Howard Stern show? Anyone?

No, Howard did
Yes...I remember him mentioning the "Q"...

But, is it the Sirius radio station or our television network or something else?

I definitely don’t know, because I have not listened to the Howard Stern Show enough since they went over to Sirius, but since they have their own gay channel on Sirius called OutQ, and they mention the other Sirius channels quite a bit on Sirius, that they would probably mention OutQ before they would mention QTN.

If George T. was talking about QTN just after San Diego added it, Stern was not on Sirius yet.
 
Posted by ptrs30 on :
 
time to average down a little, at least for me.

Thank you Doc and Imak

JMHO. do your own DD

Peter
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
Settle down people, if what Doc and Monkey gave you isnt enough then tuff luck. If your going to continue to whine about it, well

Here's a Quater
 -
call someone who cares
 
Posted by Bobbyd on :
 
What hacks me off is that when I first started investing into this Company, I was told that it was fully funded and the V.C. were buying shares up to 1 penny. The Company blamed M.M. for the falling pps. Now, we hear that the Company HAD to dilute the He$$ out of the stock? I fell misled!
 
Posted by manfromjax on :
 
Give up guys and girls... I don't think DOC and Ima are going to tell us much other then they liked what they saw. I doubt they saw the books, and if the did, they can't say.

All I want to know is did you get a copy of that dang DVD??????
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
You said you don't go back to school till tuesday and You should be able to stay up and drink till early in the morning ! So, I just assumed that you would.

quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
Ohhhh sooo now im suppose to not wake up in time for school, and have a hangover. PFFFFFFF

quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
Who woke the kids up? They're supposed to be in bed with a hangover.

quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
its going to be a bright, bright, bright, bright and sun shiney daaaa aaay. ]




 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
Speaking of the DVD, can someone post a link to where you can request it?
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
Hey its his life he can take all the time he wants to. Its your guess what he's doing. I don't want to guess. Sit there and think about something else , instead of what i'm doing.

Notice: all deputy moderator positions have been filled.


quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
Doc thank you for taking the time and effort in what you have been doing with Q. Was it worth it?
DOC, thats it? You heard them planning the gay games? What about the rest of the biz? The last 2 years of vague and deceptive PRS? The Audit we all been screaming for? The concern about the PPS? And on and on?

Give him a minute!! He might be in the middle of typing a war and peace sized post about the trip!! Or he might have had to take a leak! [Big Grin]

 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Esteban99:
Speaking of the DVD, can someone post a link to where you can request it?

staff*equityrelations.com
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
Hey its his life he can take all the time he wants to. Its your guess what he's doing. I don't want to guess. Sit there and think about something else , instead of what i'm doing.

Notice: all deputy moderator positions have been filled.



LMAO I was just messing around! Feeling sensitive this morning?

I was just typing to you what I was telling to myself! [Big Grin]
 
Posted by mattbarrett on :
 
mjm- if u only got 815,000 shares of qbid why do u spend so much time in this forum. something sounds alittle out of place?

Just sounds wierd?
 
Posted by ltesprit on :
 
Apparently they only had to sign an NDA for the meeting regarding the Gay Olympics. They weren't shown the audit or any other papers they had a legal right to see. That's disappointing. They were bait-and-switched and treated like tourists instead of shareholders.
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
Frankie boy, Frankie boy...All is great with the Q... But, what the hell ever happened to the audit? Did it ever happen and are we ever going to get it as promised?
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ltesprit:
Apparently they only had to sign an NDA for the meeting regarding the Gay Olympics. They weren't shown the audit or any other papers they had a legal right to see. That's disappointing. They were bait-and-switched and treated like tourists instead of shareholders.

Where did you get that crap from? Let Doc say what happened to Doc.
 
Posted by GatorMan on :
 
Doc, I think I read all your posts since you got back so fogive me if I ask something you've already answered.

1. Did you accomplish what I understood to be your main mission and that was to get a look at the financials?
2. Did you have to sign or otherwise promise not to share the information?
3. Did you find out anything about the preferred shares of QBID that Frank and family own? (number of shares, what percent in ownership they represent, voting rights, dividends, etc.)

I appreciate you and imakemoney making the trip to check these things out. Wish I lived close enough to do it myself.
 
Posted by hicks1 on :
 
hey monopoly money, use chaser before you go out and you won't have to worry about a hangover, The product works wonders.
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mattbarrett:
mjm- if u only got 815,000 shares of qbid why do u spend so much time in this forum. something sounds alittle out of place?

Just sounds wierd?

Why can't I have 815,000 shares?
 
Posted by sidhartha on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
quote:
Originally posted by ltesprit:
Apparently they only had to sign an NDA for the meeting regarding the Gay Olympics. They weren't shown the audit or any other papers they had a legal right to see. That's disappointing. They were bait-and-switched and treated like tourists instead of shareholders.


Where did you get that crap from? Let Doc say what happened to Doc.
"That crap" just happens to be Olsen's style, IMO.
 
Posted by moneypenny on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mattbarrett:
mjm- if u only got 815,000 shares of qbid why do u spend so much time in this forum. something sounds alittle out of place?

Just sounds wierd?

That's about what I have. Does that mean i'm not a 'real' shareholder or something???
I bought in at at least 10x what it is now!
 
Posted by mattbarrett on :
 
u can- just seems like u spend alot of time in this board. Would have thought u have more capital invested. Just my thoughts.
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
Looks like the .0003's are history. We stuck here - but for how long?
vol 573M
7X.0002
17X.0001
 
Posted by mattbarrett on :
 
foreveeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeer
 
Posted by Bobbyd on :
 
Hey DOC, Thanks for the effort, but I thought the reason for your trip was to look at the books and ask the CEO some strong questions about our investment!
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by sidhartha:
quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
quote:
Originally posted by ltesprit:
Apparently they only had to sign an NDA for the meeting regarding the Gay Olympics. They weren't shown the audit or any other papers they had a legal right to see. That's disappointing. They were bait-and-switched and treated like tourists instead of shareholders.


Where did you get that crap from? Let Doc say what happened to Doc.
"That crap" just happens to be Olsen's style, IMO.
I agree! But someone posting as fact what happened in their meeting when they don't know is crap too.
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mattbarrett:
u can- just seems like u spend alot of time in this board. Would have thought u have more capital invested. Just my thoughts.

I've covered this in the past... this board is like a hobby for me... something to do in between classes when I'm not working...

I might buy some more shares later on, I don't know... But, speaking of class...I have one at 11, so I gotta go...
 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mattbarrett:
mjm- if u only got 815,000 shares of qbid why do u spend so much time in this forum. something sounds alittle out of place?

Just sounds wierd?

If it goes to a penny like we all hope, that's $8,000. If I were a college student, I'd be interested, too.
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
Ya I guess sorry! I just thought I might have a right to ask some info from Doc, after all the work they put into the trip.
Seems like they should be able to say, "can't tell you anything", or some other stuff.
Thers a lot of newcomers in here that feel like they're making a killing, with this because they got it after Franks last 18 months of escapades. Then theres me. Its everybody elses business what they want to feel about the outcome up to this point. We have the dreamers, the theorists, the philosophers, the bashers, the pumpers, etc,. Ya Foller? [Wink]



quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
Hey its his life he can take all the time he wants to. Its your guess what he's doing. I don't want to guess. Sit there and think about something else , instead of what i'm doing.

Notice: all deputy moderator positions have been filled.



LMAO I was just messing around! Feeling sensitive this morning?

 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
I do foller! Been in QBID since .016 so I feel your pain, just numb to it after averaging down so often. Like I said, I was just typing to you what I was telling to myself at the time. I am also incredibly bored at the moment and posting too much! [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
I applaud Doc and Imak's efforts, but I am SPECULATING that all they got was the "nickle and dime tour." IMO you guys have been the most proactive as far as attempting to get info from Frankie than most of us here. It is just a damn shame that Frankie boy continues with his smoke and mirror tactics, and not to mention how inconsiderate he is - From my understanding it took two trips to corner him. What about the time/cost/travel effort by Imak and Doc...? Anyhow, Thanks guys.
 
Posted by Bobbyd on :
 
This is awfull, one of our most respected members puts out a PR for the Company?
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
Nah, a chaser wouldent do me any good, so i dont even bother [Smile]

quote:
Originally posted by hicks1:
hey monopoly money, use chaser before you go out and you won't have to worry about a hangover, The product works wonders.


 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
So your saying that im less of an investor then you with my 1 share of QBID? i find your insinuations insulting and rude.
GOOD DAY SIR!

quote:
Originally posted by mattbarrett:
mjm- if u only got 815,000 shares of qbid why do u spend so much time in this forum. something sounds alittle out of place?

Just sounds wierd?


 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
Not that we value the opinion of a 7 poster a whole lot. [Smile]
good day to you too

quote:
Originally posted by Bobbyd:
This is awfull, one of our most respected members puts out a PR for the Company?


 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
When Clinton was in office he was known as "Teflon Bill" becuase he never got scathed and always managed to weasle himself out of every thing. I think Frankie boy's new nickname should "Teflon Frank" It sounds more positive that Frankie the Fraud or Frankie the scamster. LOL!
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
Hoss, i'm hoping for the war and peace size post myself.
 
Posted by mattbarrett on :
 
Monopoly Money im sorry you are so insecure that you had to find my remark rude, especially since they were not directly towards you in any way.
 
Posted by Deg's wife on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
<<<<happy dance>>>>

Thanks Doc!

Happy dance!!!....Hell, I got the flips, turns, somersaults....I'm doing them all. And IMO, no questions need to be directed to Doc or Imak. Doc said in his last sentence, he has every intention of holding his position with QBID. That ought to be enough to let us know he is satisfied with how their meeting went.
Doc and Imak....all I can say is....YOU DA BOMBS!! I'm whistling 'Dixie' now!!! Thank you from the bottom of my heart for what you have done for us.

Robin
 
Posted by Optimus Prime on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by QBID'n:
By the way...did George Takei ever mention Q on the Howard Stern show? Anyone?

I've been listening all week and unfortunately, I haven't heard him do that.
 
Posted by mattbarrett on :
 
Monopoly Money i find your remarks to be wierd, but enough with this. Back to stocks please!
 
Posted by Team Sleep on :
 
Knowing these two guys would leave the meeting and issue a report to shareholders and potential shareholders, what do you think the CEO was going to tell them?

It's just like when the Prez holds a press conference... does he ever tell us all the bad decisions and retarded, behind-the-scenes crap that goes on? Of course not!

While we all applaud their efforts for all the shareholders, lets keep an open mind that the CEO probably did not want to divulge anything remotely negative.
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
One thing that Doc and imak can count on is that there is a lot of demand for info right now.
 
Posted by manfromjax on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
I applaud Doc and Imak's efforts, but I am SPECULATING that all they got was the "nickle and dime tour." IMO you guys have been the most proactive as far as attempting to get info from Frankie than most of us here. It is just a damn shame that Frankie boy continues with his smoke and mirror tactics, and not to mention how inconsiderate he is - From my understanding it took two trips to corner him. What about the time/cost/travel effort by Imak and Doc...? Anyhow, Thanks guys.

I kind of agree with that. They probably got the HollyWood Glitter Tour.. saw the production stage, meet a few Q Stars, and may be even got a few autographs.

But the point is that THEY went and saw that there was SOMETHING to QTN. I went to Palm Spring Oct 2004 looking for their Palm Spring address, talked to a few Gay people, no one knew nothing of QBID. At least now I know it for real, so to speak.
 
Posted by HighSide on :
 
thanks Doc for your postive post

as little as it was it was refreshing to hear your position

i, and i say i because i can only type for my self, am in need of more positive imformation to sustain happy ****** so to say

if possible pleas type more imfo
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
The main point of the trip was to see factual evidence vs Frank flapping his lips about stuff.
Anything less is like playing a nutshell game on a street corner.
We want to know how the shareholders stand in this. Thus the curiosity .
 
Posted by HighSide on :
 
the word ****** gets asterix
 
Posted by HighSide on :
 
d a n c e s gets asterix
 
Posted by Numa on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
The main point of the trip was to see factual evidence vs Frank flapping his lips about stuff.
Anything less is like playing a nutshell game on a street corner.
We want to know how the shareholders stand in this. Thus the curiosity .

Totally agree. I think Doc or Monkey are writing up a summary of what was going on. If not, I'd be rather surprised they didn't just come out and say "We saw the books, we can't talk about them." But we know that's not true since Doc talked about the NDA.

Just need to be patient. I'm sure we'll get the info we want in the coming weeks.
 
Posted by cobracobra on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mattbarrett:
mjm- if u only got 815,000 shares of qbid why do u spend so much time in this forum. something sounds alittle out of place?

Just sounds wierd?

I only have 900,000 and i am always here,,,, dont forget many of us bought really high. I bought at .012..... so tell me why thats wierd to be involved with that many shares.
 
Posted by bige2533 on :
 
In the coming weeks. Good one!

quote:
Originally posted by Numa:
quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
The main point of the trip was to see factual evidence vs Frank flapping his lips about stuff.
Anything less is like playing a nutshell game on a street corner.
We want to know how the shareholders stand in this. Thus the curiosity .

Totally agree. I think Doc or Monkey are writing up a summary of what was going on. If not, I'd be rather surprised they didn't just come out and say "We saw the books, we can't talk about them." But we know that's not true since Doc talked about the NDA.

Just need to be patient. I'm sure we'll get the info we want in the coming weeks.


 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
Ok, i'm cuffing my hands to the chair so I can't get to the keys. Swallowing key now. gulp. got it. [Wink]

quote:
Originally posted by Numa:
quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
The main point of the trip was to see factual evidence vs Frank flapping his lips about stuff.
Anything less is like playing a nutshell game on a street corner.
We want to know how the shareholders stand in this. Thus the curiosity .

Totally agree. I think Doc or Monkey are writing up a summary of what was going on. If not, I'd be rather surprised they didn't just come out and say "We saw the books, we can't talk about them." But we know that's not true since Doc talked about the NDA.

Just need to be patient. I'm sure we'll get the info we want in the coming weeks.


 
Posted by Sam1959 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
Not yet that i have heard. I have been listening.

they have talked about outQ the gay station on Sirius and they have had them on thier show.

I have to admit though i have not heard every word of the show. Im going to be calling in, and asking George about his interview on Qtelevision. see if i can get that conversation going.

rod
quote:
Originally posted by QBID'n:
By the way...did George Takei ever mention Q on the Howard Stern show? Anyone?


That is what I thought too. George is finished with the Howard Stern show for awhile now, but as they were finishing up the show this morning, he said he planned to become “like a relative” and visit the show every now and then.
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
LOL!
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
Is this patient enough?

http://i24.photobucket.com/albums/c40/seshi_luver12/animations/lollol.gif
 
Posted by ltesprit on :
 
Who would want to admit they flew all the way down there to be hoodwinked? Thanks Doc and Imak for trying. We know Frank is a slippery b-stard.

He'll show the books when he has a lawyer in his face. I think we've been sold a bag of goods. The asset valuations are just one issue. I think ownership struture was another, and I bet revenues, too. Sounds like Doc and Imak got a song and dance about revenues when they inquired.
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
Now you are just making stuff up.

Hmmm 11 posts, all about QBID.......
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
I'll be Bach.
 
Posted by bige2533 on :
 
That's the impression they are giving. Hopefully, they will follow up with lawyers and get a court ordered inspection.

quote:
Originally posted by ltesprit:
Who would want to admit they flew all the way down there to be hoodwinked? Thanks Doc and Imak for trying. We know Frank is a slippery b-stard.

He'll show the books when he has a lawyer in his face. I think we've been sold a bag of goods. The asset valuations are just one issue. I think ownership struture was another, and I bet revenues, too. Sounds like Doc and Imak got a song and dance about revenues when they inquired.


 
Posted by Wangdo on :
 
you all remind me of Veruca Salt...i want, i want and i want it NOW.

if you want the info, send in your letters to Q just like imak and doc did and go see for yourself.

doc already said he is holding. he is satisfied with what he saw to base his decision.

doc and imak don't have to post anything they saw or didn't see. they did this because they are investors and they wanted to see for themselves what their invetment is doing.

i suggest you all do the same
 
Posted by ltesprit on :
 
quote:
Now you are just making stuff up.
I wish I was. They signed one NDA and it was regarding the Gay Games meeting (stop calling people liars and see his earlier post...). There was no NDA for the audit because they were not shown the audit. If they were shown the audit he would have said so. Instead, they were given a tour of the facilities and got to meet some folks and were given the song-and-dance that the 'network is going great!!' They were treated like tourists instead of concerned shareholders, and most of us are susceptible to that. We avoid issues and confrontation.

You can apologize to me later, unless you want to avoid the issue.
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
That can work too, except that I thought we were sparing Frank the excess annoyance that would require of dozens of demand letters. Possibly.
If its good I guess thats it. There's now where to go from here, but up or out.
I know one thing though. The happy dance baby has been around a long time, So those diapers must be getting pretty stale by now. Is that Frank? [Big Grin]

quote:
Originally posted by Wangdo:
you all remind me of Veruca Salt...i want, i want and i want it NOW.

if you want the info, send in your letters to Q just like imak and doc did and go see for yourself.

doc already said he is holding. he is satisfied with what he saw to base his decision.

doc and imak don't have to post anything they saw or didn't see. they did this because they are investors and they wanted to see for themselves what their invetment is doing.

i suggest you all do the same


 
Posted by Bigrod40 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Wangdo:
you all remind me of Veruca Salt...i want, i want and i want it NOW.

if you want the info, send in your letters to Q just like imak and doc did and go see for yourself.

doc already said he is holding. he is satisfied with what he saw to base his decision.

doc and imak don't have to post anything they saw or didn't see. they did this because they are investors and they wanted to see for themselves what their invetment is doing.

i suggest you all do the same

[Razz] Wangdo, you know what I want?

Somebody to buy my QBID and ICAN (a measly 2 million of each) at .0002!!
Nobody seems to want them, must be Friday the 13th. Time to send Jason to RBC and do alittle scaring.
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
come on people grow up a bit here.

for a week before they went we have been posting statements that they will probably not get to see what they want to see, and if they do they will be forced into a NDA.

now that being said, looking at Docs posts here, he stated that he had to sign a NDA. so he can not talk about certain details of what he seen and what was said.

I have to assume that he accomplished at least some of what he sent out to do. he stated the NDA.
he stated that he is doing a happy dance.

he did not say anything negative, he sounded positive and he told us stuff we didnt know.

Doc did what he said he would do.

Im not happy that he is not telling us everything and i want to go and beat the info out of him with a stick as well. However, He signed an agreement that would put him in a legal trouble if he broke the agreement.

You really want him to suffer a legal battle and whatever consequeces that would come thim him to satisfy our desire to know what he knows? I dont want him in trouble, I want the info, so the only thing i can think of doing is actually spending my own money, request the visit and go see for myself, or take Docs word for what he told us and be happy with that.

Damit all i want the info bad, but on the other side i trust Doc enough that i will sit with what he has told us, and be happy with that. not as happy as i want to be, but happy that he is possitive and happier that he is not negative, and even happier that he shared what he did share with us.

At this point in the investment there is nothing i can salvage out of my investment but a lousy $900 and im going to let it all ride on red.

I hate you cant tell us anymore Doc, but i do understand and said i would stand behind your decisions whatever they maybe, so thanks for your time, money and effort that you put into yesterdays meeting. I feel we may never know how much you have investing into this endevour, and that if we did, anyone that has said anything bad about you would feel foolish.

Thanks Doc and Imak for the incredible effort the 2 of you have put to this project.


as always i am here till the end.

oh and i did buy another chunk this morning.

I have more then doubled my possition on the q in the last 48 hours.

Rod

quote:
Originally posted by Bobbyd:
Hey DOC, Thanks for the effort, but I thought the reason for your trip was to look at the books and ask the CEO some strong questions about our investment!


 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ltesprit:
quote:
Now you are just making stuff up.
I wish I was. They signed one NDA and it was regarding the Gay Games meeting (stop calling people liars and see his earlier post...). There was no NDA for the audit because they were not shown the audit. If they were shown the audit he would have said so. Instead, they were given a tour of the facilities and got to meet some folks and were given the song-and-dance that the 'network is going great!!' They were treated like tourists instead of concerned shareholders, and most of us are susceptible to that. We avoid issues and confrontation.

You can apologize to me later, unless you want to avoid the issue.

I will wait until they tell me that they didn't see the audit. I will wait until they tell me how they were treated.
You might be right, but you don't know it, you are speculating.

I like confrontation and you are lying through your teeth.
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
he can talk about whatever he wants he is a valued member here.

you dont have to read his posts if you dont like him.

simple self moderation.

Rod

quote:
Originally posted by mattbarrett:
Monopoly Money i find your remarks to be wierd, but enough with this. Back to stocks please!


 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
Do you really think Doc and espcailly monkey would have went all the way there to be treated to a song and dance show. HA HA HAAAA i think not. You are severly mistaken if you actually believe that those 2 were lulled into a stuper by the QBID sirens and accepted the riverdance show. You are letting you imagination run off without your logic.

You are incorrect and you shall be the one appologizing for your statement.

Good day sir.

quote:
Originally posted by ltesprit:
quote:
Now you are just making stuff up.
I wish I was. They signed one NDA and it was regarding the Gay Games meeting (stop calling people liars and see his earlier post...). There was no NDA for the audit because they were not shown the audit. If they were shown the audit he would have said so. Instead, they were given a tour of the facilities and got to meet some folks and were given the song-and-dance that the 'network is going great!!' They were treated like tourists instead of concerned shareholders, and most of us are susceptible to that. We avoid issues and confrontation.

You can apologize to me later, unless you want to avoid the issue.


 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
i dont know what they saw, but you dont have to sign a NDA to look at the studio.

he cant talk about it.


hes not selling


judging from one post, it is possible that he may have bought more. even if he didnt buy more

he stated hes doing the happy dance.


let him be. he told us enough in those statements. I dont want him getting himself in trouble for our selfish needs. You should show the same respects as well.

EVERYONE STOP PESTERING THE MAN.


quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
The main point of the trip was to see factual evidence vs Frank flapping his lips about stuff.
Anything less is like playing a nutshell game on a street corner.
We want to know how the shareholders stand in this. Thus the curiosity .


 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
*trys to slip in a distraction*
 -
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
I will by your QBID shares from you Rod. send me a pm and we can set that up.

Rod

quote:
Originally posted by Bigrod40:
quote:
Originally posted by Wangdo:
you all remind me of Veruca Salt...i want, i want and i want it NOW.

if you want the info, send in your letters to Q just like imak and doc did and go see for yourself.

doc already said he is holding. he is satisfied with what he saw to base his decision.

doc and imak don't have to post anything they saw or didn't see. they did this because they are investors and they wanted to see for themselves what their invetment is doing.

i suggest you all do the same

[Razz] Wangdo, you know what I want?

Somebody to buy my QBID and ICAN (a measly 2 million of each) at .0002!!
Nobody seems to want them, must be Friday the 13th. Time to send Jason to RBC and do alittle scaring.


 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ltesprit:
Apparently they only had to sign an NDA for the meeting regarding the Gay Olympics. They weren't shown the audit or any other papers they had a legal right to see. That's disappointing. They were bait-and-switched and treated like tourists instead of shareholders.

Hold the f*cking press here dipsh*t....don't come on this thread pizzing on Doc and Imak as if you had a real reason to. What?...did you expect them to come back and post some long azz positive report. Yeah well so did we. But surely to god you knew it would not be official. Or did you?...because you and others are already beginning to sound like it. Neither Doc or Imak are the SEC or official securities representatives. Nor have they ever claimed to be. They are merely shareholders of TMM and anything they post is nothing but an Allstock’s QBID thread post, having only the value of each of our own personal perception.

And if I remember correctly, they each had their own "personal" agenda. They didn't go down there for ltesprit!....so quit acting as if they owe you something.

In fact, how about you just take your azz back to iHub. Don't worry about what Doc and Imak have or don't have. Your disrespect and ungratefulness has proven you not worthy of any fruit their efforts bare, official or unofficial.
 
Posted by a4realguy on :
 
SSDD
SSDM
 
Posted by Numa on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
i dont know what they saw, but you dont have to sign a NDA to look at the studio.

he cant talk about it.


hes not selling


judging from one post, it is possible that he may have bought more. even if he didnt buy more

he stated hes doing the happy dance.


let him be. he told us enough in those statements. I dont want him getting himself in trouble for our selfish needs. You should show the same respects as well.

EVERYONE STOP PESTERING THE MAN.


quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
The main point of the trip was to see factual evidence vs Frank flapping his lips about stuff.
Anything less is like playing a nutshell game on a street corner.
We want to know how the shareholders stand in this. Thus the curiosity .


PT, in case you missed it:

quote:
From Doc

Good Morning fellow "Qbiddians". Well some of you may have heard that we were asked to sign a non-disclosure agreement at "Q". I need to be very clear on that, the non-disclosure agreement was related to the attending of the Gay Games Production meeting on Thursday.

It's very clear what he signed the NDA for, it says nothing about financial statements.

If he did see it, the NDA would not stop him from saying he saw it. It would protect the content of what he saw. But again, he was very clear (his words) on what the NDA was for.
 
Posted by Deg's wife on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by QBID'n:
quote:
Originally posted by ltesprit:
Apparently they only had to sign an NDA for the meeting regarding the Gay Olympics. They weren't shown the audit or any other papers they had a legal right to see. That's disappointing. They were bait-and-switched and treated like tourists instead of shareholders.

Hold the f*cking press here dipsh*t....don't come on this thread pizzing on Doc and Imak as if you had a real reason to. What?...did you expect them to come back and post some long azz positive report. Yeah well so did we. But surely to god you knew it would not be official. Or did you?...because you and others are already beginning to sound like it. Neither Doc or Imak are the SEC or official securities representatives. Nor have they ever claimed to be. They are merely shareholders of TMM and anything they post is nothing but an Allstock’s QBID thread post, having only the value of each of our own personal perception.

And if I remember correctly, they each had their own "personal" agenda. They didn't go down there for ltesprit!....so quit acting as if they owe you something.

In fact, how about you just take your azz back to iHub. Don't worry about what Doc and Imak have or don't have. Your disrespect and ungratefulness has proven you not worthy of any fruit their efforts bare, official or unofficial.

You know what? These poster that are coming in demanding, have probably not been here as long as us 'oldies'. Us 'oldies' have the patience, have been thru a lot with this stock, holding long, etc. They got to learn what we have inherited with our QBID. We've watched it be born, from the beginning...it's gone thru the infancy, toddling, walking...I think my Q family knows what I am meaning.
So, with that said, please leave Doc and Imak alone. We've lost a lot of good people; our family sure don't want to lose anymore Q family!!
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
show me in that passage where they had multiple meetings the info they got was at this meeting so you dont know how broad the NDA was.

speculation get you nowhere.

Doc would share what doc can share, i know that in my heart.

lay off doc he owes you nothing for an expanation.

grow up spend your own money and go get the answers you need.

Im happy with Docs explanation.

many here are happy with his explanation.

you dont know what happened at the meeting you can not prove what was signed and what was not.

Plain and simple leave the man alone, its his info to decide what he is going to do with it.

be happy with what you got you ungrateful individual.

Rod


quote:
Originally posted by Numa:
quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
i dont know what they saw, but you dont have to sign a NDA to look at the studio.

he cant talk about it.


hes not selling


judging from one post, it is possible that he may have bought more. even if he didnt buy more

he stated hes doing the happy dance.


let him be. he told us enough in those statements. I dont want him getting himself in trouble for our selfish needs. You should show the same respects as well.

EVERYONE STOP PESTERING THE MAN.


quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
The main point of the trip was to see factual evidence vs Frank flapping his lips about stuff.
Anything less is like playing a nutshell game on a street corner.
We want to know how the shareholders stand in this. Thus the curiosity .


PT, in case you missed it:

quote:
From Doc

Good Morning fellow "Qbiddians". Well some of you may have heard that we were asked to sign a non-disclosure agreement at "Q". I need to be very clear on that, the non-disclosure agreement was related to the attending of the Gay Games Production meeting on Thursday.

It's very clear what he signed the NDA for, it says nothing about financial statements.

If he did see it, the NDA would not stop him from saying he saw it. It would protect the content of what he saw. But again, he was very clear (his words) on what the NDA was for.


 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
 -
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
Nah, a chaser wouldent do me any good, so i dont even bother [Smile]

quote:
Originally posted by hicks1:
hey monopoly money, use chaser before you go out and you won't have to worry about a hangover, The product works wonders.


I think he meant those Chaser pills...but apparently they don't work all that well...
 
Posted by ltesprit on :
 
Folks: you can cry and scream and call names, but apparently they didn't see the audit and didn't get an audience with Olsen to voice their shareholder concerns. They did, however, get a nice tour which I'm sure was their intent all along and worth the airfare. I feel bad for them but am glad they tried.
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
Is this patient enough?

http://i24.photobucket.com/albums/c40/seshi_luver12/animations/lollol.gif

hahahaha, stop posting that haha
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
OKAY ITESPRIT!!!!
 -
NOW!!!!!!!!

quote:
Originally posted by ltesprit:
Folks: you can cry and scream and call names, but apparently they didn't see the audit and didn't get an audience with Olsen to voice their shareholder concerns. They did, however, get a nice tour which I'm sure was their intent all along and worth the airfare. I feel bad for them but am glad they tried.


 
Posted by Deg's wife on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ltesprit:
Folks: you can cry and scream and call names, but apparently they didn't see the audit and didn't get an audience with Olsen to voice their shareholder concerns. They did, however, get a nice tour which I'm sure was their intent all along and worth the airfare. I feel bad for them but am glad they tried.

Itesprit,
Did you see what Doc wrote...He said he was happy and was holding...that is all I needed to hear..and I am sure there are others who will agree.
 
Posted by Numa on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
show me in that passage where they had multiple meetings the info they got was at this meeting so you dont know how broad the NDA was.

speculation get you nowhere.

Doc would share what doc can share, i know that in my heart.

lay off doc he owes you nothing for an expanation.

grow up spend your own money and go get the answers you need.

Im happy with Docs explanation.

many here are happy with his explanation.

you dont know what happened at the meeting you can not prove what was signed and what was not.

Plain and simple leave the man alone, its his info to decide what he is going to do with it.

be happy with what you got you ungrateful individual.

Rod


quote:
Originally posted by Numa:
quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
i dont know what they saw, but you dont have to sign a NDA to look at the studio.

he cant talk about it.


hes not selling


judging from one post, it is possible that he may have bought more. even if he didnt buy more

he stated hes doing the happy dance.


let him be. he told us enough in those statements. I dont want him getting himself in trouble for our selfish needs. You should show the same respects as well.

EVERYONE STOP PESTERING THE MAN.


quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
The main point of the trip was to see factual evidence vs Frank flapping his lips about stuff.
Anything less is like playing a nutshell game on a street corner.
We want to know how the shareholders stand in this. Thus the curiosity .


PT, in case you missed it:

quote:
From Doc

Good Morning fellow "Qbiddians". Well some of you may have heard that we were asked to sign a non-disclosure agreement at "Q". I need to be very clear on that, the non-disclosure agreement was related to the attending of the Gay Games Production meeting on Thursday.

It's very clear what he signed the NDA for, it says nothing about financial statements.

If he did see it, the NDA would not stop him from saying he saw it. It would protect the content of what he saw. But again, he was very clear (his words) on what the NDA was for.


Got to hell, PT. I'm behid Doc 100% and I've been defending him in all of my posts. If you can't even read a simple passage about Doc addressing the concerns about an NDA, that's your problem. Then you have the gall to say not to speculate. But yeah, I'm sure the Production meeting went over the share structure and ownership of QTN/QBID, while reviewing their audit. That has to be it....

I'm going off info DIRECTLY FROM THE HORSE'S MOUTH. You're throwing all kinds of other variables into the equation.

In my post to you I was pointing out something I thought you missed and you go off on me. Yeah, I should grow up.

Switch to decaf.
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
he can talk about whatever he wants he is a valued member here.

you dont have to read his posts if you dont like him.

simple self moderation.

Rod

quote:
Originally posted by mattbarrett:
Monopoly Money i find your remarks to be wierd, but enough with this. Back to stocks please!


OOOhhh, I see the fierce rivals have come to a compromise... finally there can be peace between PT and MM... finally we don't have to look at purple dinosaurs anymore... finally the name calling and use of "jackass" can stop... it's finally over...

LOL
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by a4realguy:
SSDD
SSDM

SSSU (Same ****, same user)
 
Posted by Aleks on :
 
I think that those two guys should ask anyone that wants information to pony up some cash for their airline tickets....

Everyone chip in and then talk shyiit.
Period.
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
I had to go out. I'm back. Are you kids behaving yourselves here.
Got to go. But i'll be back.
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ltesprit:
Folks: you can cry and scream and call names, but apparently they didn't see the audit and didn't get an audience with Olsen to voice their shareholder concerns. They did, however, get a nice tour which I'm sure was their intent all along and worth the airfare. I feel bad for them but am glad they tried.

Ahhh, that's wonderful that you just jump to conclusions...

It's great that we have such dedicated people, that they would spend the time and energy to setup this meeting and then go to it... but then, the mood is just ruined when you (and your brethren) come along and trample upon the good feelings...

THANKS DOC AND IMAK...don't let these ****s annoy you...
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
Well this is just to funny some of you just dont have a clue, Im holding and adding more at these prices, now take that how you want and dont invest more than you can lose, I hear people talking about what they have in this and its nothing compared to what i have invested but thats me not you, At this time i want my buy order to go through, we saw so much and got sooo many things to think about i need time to take it all in before i say more.IMHO IF YOUR LONG AND CAN WAIT AND I MEAN LIKE SIX MONTHS TO A YEAR STAY THAT WAY IF NOT SELL AND MOVE ON.
 
Posted by a4realguy on :
 
We are all DESPERATE for information... and mostly positive information... so we are likely to feel good to hear almost anything... if the president of Time Warner mentions TMM in a conversation.. someone here will post "maybe they are going to buy QBID".... Doc's attempt aside, there is absolutely NO reason to be satisfied with how Fank has handled communication or MOSTLY a lack-there-of with the shareholders.
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ltesprit:
Folks: you can cry and scream and call names, but apparently they didn't see the audit and didn't get an audience with Olsen to voice their shareholder concerns. They did, however, get a nice tour which I'm sure was their intent all along and worth the airfare. I feel bad for them but am glad they tried.

Bullsh*t!...what is your point? That's what I wanna know. What's your point?

You really was expecting something as if it were going to be official and you know that. Your just trying to beat around the bush as to my claim.

Name calling? Well I'm not calling you any names for spite. I just said you was a dumbazz for actually expecting something official.

Come on, admit it!...that's pretty f*cking lame on your part isn't it?
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
Don't let this board turn into this-->

 -
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
Well this is just to funny some of you just dont have a clue, Im holding and adding more at these prices, now take that how you want and dont invest more than you can lose, I hear people talking about what they have in this and its nothing compared to what i have invested but thats me not you, At this time i want my buy order to go through, we saw so much and got sooo many things to think about i need time to take it all in before i say more.IMHO IF YOUR LONG AND CAN WAIT AND I MEAN LIKE SIX MONTHS TO A YEAR STAY THAT WAY IF NOT SELL AND MOVE ON.

I never thought I would say this, much less multiple times, but you rock Monkey. [Big Grin]
Thank you!
 
Posted by Aleks on :
 
how much does Imakemoney have invested? Like, how many shares?
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
ALOT
 
Posted by Clyde_Crashcup on :
 
Everyone take a pill and chill. Remember this is a long hold. It might be 8-10 years before you see a substancial return on your investment. It doesn't matter what they found. It's not going to change a thing.
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Clyde_Crashcup:
Everyone take a pill and chill. Remember this is a long hold. It might be 8-10 years before you see a substancial return on your investment. It doesn't matter what they found. It's not going to change a thing.

....in a nutshell!

Thanks CC
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
i still got my stock of vallum if anyone needs one [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
Seriously, how is that any of your business wether he has 1 share like me or 265 million shres like jen. You dont require information such as that, and its in very poor taste to even ask.

quote:
Originally posted by Aleks:
how much does Imakemoney have invested? Like, how many shares?


 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
i still got my stock of vallum if anyone needs one [Big Grin]

Actually I feel fine. But thanks just the same. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
Just thought id offer [Smile]

quote:
Originally posted by QBID'n:
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
i still got my stock of vallum if anyone needs one [Big Grin]

Actually I feel fine. But thanks just the same. [Big Grin]

 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
 -

MM
... because there are too many "whiners" posting today? Just a guess ... [Big Grin]
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
Aleks, Mydream1 and JonasInvest speak the same tongue.

Not to say they are the same person. [Wink]
 
Posted by Doctoall on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
Well this is just to funny some of you just dont have a clue, Im holding and adding more at these prices, now take that how you want and dont invest more than you can lose, I hear people talking about what they have in this and its nothing compared to what i have invested but thats me not you, At this time i want my buy order to go through, we saw so much and got sooo many things to think about i need time to take it all in before i say more.IMHO IF YOUR LONG AND CAN WAIT AND I MEAN LIKE SIX MONTHS TO A YEAR STAY THAT WAY IF NOT SELL AND MOVE ON.

I never thought I would say this, much less multiple times, but you rock Monkey. [Big Grin]
Thank you!

For those who want to go back into the "Q" old threads, you will see that Imakmony and I have not seen eye to eye on this investment and have had our moments. So when we whet to "Q" there were two very different opinions going into the studio. But the common thread between us was that we really wanted to be convinence about our investment and if we should stay with "Q". We went and we have decided to hold. For those of you who have not met Mike, well putting it mild he is no push over and fiery as hell. He kept me in check.

For others out there,maybe it would not be a bad idea to go to Burbank yourself, Southwest can get you there from almost anywhere in the US for $99.00 each way, the airport is 2 miles from the studio. See for yourself what your money is doing.

I am sure that when they get the IR relocated to Burbank in 3 weeks, Richard will be able to set up a time for you.

I will post more information after I have had time to process it and I also want to talk with the "Q" lawyer once again about what I post.

In the meantime, I am satisfied to hold and even add to my position. [Big Grin] Take it for what it's worth. Got a great idea for a show, how about a show called "Shareholders Roundtable" staring Richard Brown et al. J/K
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
 -

MM
... because there are too many "whiners" posting today? Just a guess ... [Big Grin]

wow your less senial then i originally thought [Big Grin] .... DING DING DING WE HAVE A WINNA...
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
... Im holding and adding more at these prices, now take that how you want and dont invest more than you can lose ...

Thanks, imak, but please don't say anymore until all the "whiners" have left the building ... [Big Grin]
 
Posted by ltesprit on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
Well this is just to funny some of you just dont have a clue

You mean, a 'clue' as to whether you got to see the audit as you intended? [Wink] Go ahead, Imak, tell 'em.

Thanks for the effort, and good to hear you're adding. From the market action it appears a lot more folks are selling, but then they didn't get to see the facilities like you did. It sounds like you guys were pretty impressed.
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
To all of you posters... when your opinion is no longer respected... I offer you this advice...

STOP! Think! Is this something that a normal-type-guy can easily understand? Are you backing up what you're saying? Are you posting the same **** everyday? Is your intent just to try to anger others?

AND, when you feel as though you are being disrespected... When you feel as though people are ignoring you... When you feel as though no one cares what you have to say... THEN, see the above again...

If that doesn't work...DO NOT fall for that easy out... When you are at that registration screen, do not sign up for another account... Instead above...

If that doesn't work, just stop posting altogether on this thread... I'm sure there's an offtopic board labeled "Nonsense"
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
... Im holding and adding more at these prices, now take that how you want and dont invest more than you can lose ...

Thanks, imak, but please don't say anymore until all the "whiners" have left the building ... [Big Grin]
NOW BT, i will agree with you their, i think IMAK and DOC should make everyone suffer, Us who are cool and calm can wait, and the people who would suffer would be most desperately wanting the info, and actually undeserving of it. Not that any of us are but it would be fun to watch them squirm.

I got money in this yes, is it fun to see it worth so little no, do i have faith in Q yes, Do i have faith in what doc and imak say, yes. I am personally not worried, i invested what i could afford to lose so i write it off as such. If you did not do the same then you should not have invested in the first place. Simple economics, if you cant afford it then logicaly you shouldent purchase it.

Thanks again Doc, and monkey, glad to see you both back safe. And i say you should make everyone wait at least a week, i would at least laugh.
 
Posted by ltesprit on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Doctoall:
I am sure that when they get the IR relocated to Burbank in 3 weeks, Richard will be able to set up a time for you.

I am fascinated that they're moving Rich to Burbank. This suggests that they're serious about investor relations, even if many of their actions to date belie that. ('SAAG'?? Postponing audit results?? Stealth dilution??)

But the problem has never been the location of Rich. Or 'MM manipulation.' Or sunspots. It's been transparency, disclosure, and corporate governance. What did you learn about those things that make you feel more confident?
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Doctoall:
... I will post more information after I have had time to process it and I also want to talk with the "Q" lawyer once again about what I post.

Thanks, Doc, but please delay posting any more info until all the "whiners" have left the building. Don't want to share with any "non-believers". [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Ligge on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
... Im holding and adding more at these prices, now take that how you want and dont invest more than you can lose ...

Thanks, imak, but please don't say anymore until all the "whiners" have left the building ... [Big Grin]
Ditto!
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
Dont throw me in the middle of this i didnt manipulate anything, why you gotta blame me for that, what did i dooooooo.


quote:
Originally posted by ltesprit:
quote:
Originally posted by Doctoall:
I am sure that when they get the IR relocated to Burbank in 3 weeks, Richard will be able to set up a time for you.

I am fascinated that they're moving Rich to Burbank. This indicates that they're serious about investor relations, even if many of their actions to date belie that. ('SAAG'?? Postponing audit results?? Stealth dilution??)

But the problem has never been the location of Rich. Or 'MM manipulation.' Or sunspots. It's been transparency, disclosure, and corporate governance. What did you learn about those things that make you feel more confident?


 
Posted by mydream1 on :
 
From the point of investment(Not just to QBID),if this is really a great company,and great potential, why no big institution join it and buy their shares? Why the PPS went down at here - 0.0001? Why it is still dumpping billions shares into the market? There must be some thing wrong,but just we don't know it.
I wish everyone can calm down, think about it,and discuss it,because all of us hold a bunch of this "junk"(currently just like "junk" [Smile] ).
 
Posted by Wangdo on :
 
I am definatley in a HOLDING pattern, after adding more today [Big Grin]
 
Posted by ltesprit on :
 
Monopoly Money, you wrote: 'And i say you should make everyone wait at least a week, i would at least laugh.'

Wait for what? PS. In case you can't hear it, I'm laughing now.
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ltesprit:
quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
Well this is just to funny some of you just dont have a clue

You mean, a 'clue' as to whether you got to see the audit as you intended? [Wink] Go ahead, Imak, tell 'em.


How pathedic. What are you fishing for man?....get real!
 
Posted by dskalka on :
 
Hello to all my name is Dan And I have posted on other sites as Intepid. I want to thank Doc and Imak for taking time from thier lives to get first hand info for all of us. I mostly lurk in the shadows because I don't feel what I have to add is relevent. I do feel that if Doc and Imak are happy with what they saw that is good enough for me at this time.

I have been in this stock for more than a year and have lost considerable money. However I think it is just a matter of time before this runs long and hard.

once again thanks for time and info.

Danny
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
To all of you posters... when your opinion is no longer respected... I offer you this advice...

STOP! Think! Is this something that a normal-type-guy can easily understand? Are you backing up what you're saying? Are you posting the same **** everyday? Is your intent just to try to anger others?

AND, when you feel as though you are being disrespected... When you feel as though people are ignoring you... When you feel as though no one cares what you have to say... THEN, see the above again...

If that doesn't work...DO NOT fall for that easy out... When you are at that registration screen, do not sign up for another account... Instead above...

If that doesn't work, just stop posting altogether on this thread... I'm sure there's an offtopic board labeled "Nonsense"

mjm
Well done ... who said college kids are dumber than they used to be? [Big Grin]
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
Email Rod not PM.
 
Posted by ltesprit on :
 
What folks here have to come to grips with is that many pink sheet stocks sell for pennies. Not one hundredth of a cent. QBID's price of .0001, the very bottom of the gutter, is a referendum on the credibility of management. The market believes it is worthless, hence, the security (a QBID share) is worthless. It needn't be so, but, alas, it is. Can't argue with reality.

The fact is, Olsen's treatment of Doc and Imak is consistent with this credibility problem. He did not show them the documents they flew down to see (and to which they apparently have the legal right.) Instead he arranged a song and dance similar to all the other shareholder events, PRs, and letters we've gotten so far, and consitent with this lack of credibility. In layman's terms, same old bullsh-t.

Curse, blame, apologize, do whatever, but don't blame the messenger. You won't hear about an audit from them because they didn't get to see one. It's a shame, and Olsen is to blame, not them. (Or me! [Wink]
 
Posted by ptrs30 on :
 
My take on what Doc and Imac have told us as of yet.

1.- By end of March, it will be 90 days from all of the Novemeber and December carriers and we will see the money coming in. Untill then, Q has to finance itself somehow, and they will do that based on what they expect to start receiving from subs every month.

2.- Gay Games meeting was the meeting where a lot of things were discusses and thus the NDA was signed. I would guess any new carrier/Dish/Direct TV in the works was discussed there. I do remember when Frank telling us some time ago that talking about DISH cost them the agreement. So, if I was them, I would do the same thing and make everybody sign the NDA, because during the conversation they will talk about the upcoming agreements like " Dish would do this, or Direct would do that".

3.- Doc said they are working hard on getting new carriers. This means more is on the way and in the works.

4.- I have seen the studio. Its huge, and having seen my friend's small local studio, and how much he spent to set it up, I know for a fact that the currect valuation of the company based on the current share price does not make any sense.

5.- From what I understood, Doc and Imak are buying more. That by itself means a lot.

Do your own research and decide on your own. I think this thing has a chance to make it big. I am averaging down. See what happens in 6 months.

Good luck to all.

Peter
 
Posted by Marcus on :
 
Wow after lurking for a while here I am going to have to put my 2 cents in here and sing a song from SPAMALOT:

"ALWAYS LOOK ON THE BRIGHT SIDE OF LIFE" If you've been to New York and have seen it, the song will be in your head all day [Smile]
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
Dont throw me in the middle of this i didnt manipulate anything, why you gotta blame me for that, what did i dooooooo.

MM
The truth finally comes out. Now I understand.

When everyone was blaming MMs for naked short selling, etc, I thought they were talking about Market Makers. But it was YOU all the time. [Eek!] [Big Grin]
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ltesprit:
What folks here have to come to grips with is that many pink sheet stocks sell for pennies. Not one hundredth of a cent. QBID's price of .0001, the very bottom of the gutter, is a referendum on the credibility of management. The market believes it is worthless, hence, the security (a QBID share) is worthless. It needn't be so, but, alas, it is. Can't argue with reality.

The fact is, Olsen's treatment of Doc and Imak is consistent with this credibility problem. He did not show them the documents they flew down to see (and to which they apparently have the legal right.) Instead he arranged a song and dance similar to all the other shareholder events, PRs, and letters we've gotten so far, and consitent with this lack of credibility. In layman's terms, same old bullsh-t.

Curse, blame, apologize, do whatever, but don't blame the messenger. You won't hear about an audit from them because they didn't get to see one. It's a shame, and Olsen is to blame, not them. (Or me! [Wink]

]"...but don't blame the messenger."


No one is blaming Doc and Imak except your dumbazz!.....you and your bashing cronies.
 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
Ladies, please, you're ALL beautiful
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
Thanks:)

quote:
Originally posted by Esteban99:
Ladies, please, you're ALL beautiful


 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
shhhhhhhhhhhhhhh

quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
Dont throw me in the middle of this i didnt manipulate anything, why you gotta blame me for that, what did i dooooooo.

MM
The truth finally comes out. Now I understand.

When everyone was blaming MMs for naked short selling, etc, I thought they were talking about Market Makers. But it was YOU all the time. [Eek!] [Big Grin]


 
Posted by cobracobra on :
 
well here is some sorta good news, i've had a GTC in since open at .0001 and it has not filled... i think i will up it and finally drop my average way down.... C'Mon Q make me some CASH!!!
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ltesprit:
... The fact is ... he (Frank) did not show them the documents they flew down to see.... Instead, he arranged a song and dance similar to all the other shareholder events, PRs, and letters we've gotten so far .... Curse, blame, apologize, do whatever, but don't blame the messenger. You won't hear about an audit from them because they didn't get to see one. It's a shame, and Olsen is to blame, not them. (Or me! [Wink]

ltesprit
First, are you the "messenger" you don't want us to blame? I have to know before I comment further.
 
Posted by ltesprit on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Esteban99:
Ladies, please, you're ALL beautiful

LOL! Good one!

I think QBID'n is going to cry...! Take it easy QBID'n, no ones blaming Doc and Imak or putting them down!
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ltesprit:
quote:
Originally posted by Esteban99:
Ladies, please, you're ALL beautiful

LOL! Good one!

I think QBID'n is going to cry...! Take it easy QBID'n, no ones blaming Doc and Imak or putting them down!

Your are one of the reasons I am glad that smell-o-vision never panned out. [Smile]
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Esteban99:
Ladies, please, you're ALL beautiful

Okay, sure...."ms.media", just don't you go getting your panties in a wad.
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
Has anyone been able to buy below .0002? Appears that any trade labeled ".0001" is very likely a bit higher ... using that extra decimal that most brokers won't allow.

So, buying or selling using a market order (which I DON'T recommend) might result in a trade in the .00011 to .00019 range.

Anyone have anything to add?
 
Posted by Sam1959 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ltesprit:
[...]
You won't hear about an audit from them because they didn't get to see one.
[...]

Do you think it is possible that the audit contains all the financial information for the company and therefore information about the Gay Games that they signed the NDA for? (Rhetorical question)

I myself can quite easily see why Doc and Imak may want to think things over and maybe even get clearance from TMM (or their legal representative) before saying something on a public message board that could get them in trouble.

I’m sure they would like to provide us with all the information that we want, but need to make sure they don’t end up in trouble for disclosing information they should not. They have signed an NDA and also they may have other good reasons for keeping tight-lipped about something.

Please be patient and don’t badger them. I’m sure they will tell us all they can when they are ready.
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
Cry!...hey little boy, all I wanted for you to do was admit you actually were waiting for info as if it was going to be official. Talk about risk!...if that don't beat all I've ever seen.
 
Posted by Esteban99 on :
 
I don't believe a market order with *most* institutions will be able to give you 5 digits. They just aren't set up for it.
 
Posted by sidhartha on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Sam1959:
quote:
Originally posted by ltesprit:
[...]
You won't hear about an audit from them because they didn't get to see one.
[...]

Do you think it is possible that the audit contains all the financial information for the company and therefore information about the Gay Games that they signed the NDA for? (Rhetorical question)

I myself can quite easily see why Doc and Imak may want to think things over and maybe even get clearance from TMM (or their legal representative) before saying something on a public message board that could get them in trouble.

I’m sure they would like to provide us with all the information that we want, but need to make sure they don’t end up in trouble for disclosing information they should not. They have signed an NDA and also they may have other good reasons for keeping tight-lipped about something.

Please be patient and don’t badger them. I’m sure they will tell us all they can when they are ready.

right on Sam
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
Hey MM, how about posting the dunce cap for ltesprit....that's the next best thing I can think of since I can't be in his presence to hold him down and write it on his forehead.
 
Posted by bige2533 on :
 
Thanks for the trip and your updates. We're all looking forward to your additional posts. I think most of the disappointment being expressed comes from the fact the trip to Burbank was seen as an inspection of their records as described on the state of Washington's website. That was believed to be the top priority. Since there is no report on the top priority, some of us are obviously disappointed. Add that to the current distrust in the company and it is easy to conclude that Frank has not come clean.

quote:
Originally posted by Doctoall:
quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
Well this is just to funny some of you just dont have a clue, Im holding and adding more at these prices, now take that how you want and dont invest more than you can lose, I hear people talking about what they have in this and its nothing compared to what i have invested but thats me not you, At this time i want my buy order to go through, we saw so much and got sooo many things to think about i need time to take it all in before i say more.IMHO IF YOUR LONG AND CAN WAIT AND I MEAN LIKE SIX MONTHS TO A YEAR STAY THAT WAY IF NOT SELL AND MOVE ON.

I never thought I would say this, much less multiple times, but you rock Monkey. [Big Grin]
Thank you!

For those who want to go back into the "Q" old threads, you will see that Imakmony and I have not seen eye to eye on this investment and have had our moments. So when we whet to "Q" there were two very different opinions going into the studio. But the common thread between us was that we really wanted to be convinence about our investment and if we should stay with "Q". We went and we have decided to hold. For those of you who have not met Mike, well putting it mild he is no push over and fiery as hell. He kept me in check.

For others out there,maybe it would not be a bad idea to go to Burbank yourself, Southwest can get you there from almost anywhere in the US for $99.00 each way, the airport is 2 miles from the studio. See for yourself what your money is doing.

I am sure that when they get the IR relocated to Burbank in 3 weeks, Richard will be able to set up a time for you.

I will post more information after I have had time to process it and I also want to talk with the "Q" lawyer once again about what I post.

In the meantime, I am satisfied to hold and even add to my position. [Big Grin] Take it for what it's worth. Got a great idea for a show, how about a show called "Shareholders Roundtable" staring Richard Brown et al. J/K


 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
About Itespirt.

While im not going to comment on all the recent attacks on him, i will say that i follow his posts on IHUB and he is Somebody that you want on your side. He knows quite a bit about the situation we are in and speaks about how to get out of our current situation. He may be a bit edgy but he is not afraid to say what is on his mind.

Right now everyone has to understand that we are at .0001. Cant go any lower without a Reverse Split. Yes everyones emotions are high, as they should be, but Itespirit does mean well IMO.
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by ltesprit:
... The fact is ... he (Frank) did not show them the documents they flew down to see.... Instead, he arranged a song and dance similar to all the other shareholder events, PRs, and letters we've gotten so far .... Curse, blame, apologize, do whatever, but don't blame the messenger. You won't hear about an audit from them because they didn't get to see one. It's a shame, and Olsen is to blame, not them. (Or me! [Wink]

ltesprit
First, are you the "messenger" you don't want us to blame? I have to know before I comment further.

Itesprit
After re-reading your comments, it appears you are calling Doc/imak the "messengers" in this case. If so, I totally agree that we should not blame them for anything they have or have not told us about their visit to Burbank. And once again, I thank both of them for their time and efforts.

Now for the real purpose of my post:

You also have taken the role of "messenger" by posting your opinions regarding Doc/imak's visit. In your case, we can and should "blame the messenger" because you have violated the integrity of your position by delivering a false and distorted message. You have not acted in good faith as a messenger because you have presented unsupported and biased opinion in place of the truth.

Since Doc and imak have not yet told us what happened at Burbank, how can you state what you "assume" happened and expect us to applaud you?

If you choose to see the "glass half empty", so be it. But don't try to present your negative message as truth ... or we will have every right to "kill the messenger". [Eek!]
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
Ditto!

quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
About Itespirt.

Right now everyone has to understand that we are at .0001. Cant go any lower without a Reverse Split. Yes everyones emotions are high, as they should be, but Itespirit does mean well IMO.


 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
About Itespirt.

While im not going to comment on all the recent attacks on him, i will say that i follow his posts on IHUB and he is Somebody that you want on your side. He knows quite a bit about the situation we are in and speaks about how to get out of our current situation. He may be a bit edgy but he is not afraid to say what is on his mind.

Right now everyone has to understand that we are at .0001. Cant go any lower without a Reverse Split. Yes everyones emotions are high, as they should be, but Itespirit does mean well IMO.

If he means well then he should not be so disrespectful and ungrateful MT.
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
Now dont stone me to death please. But i am going to go against Docs and Imak's very positive posts from last night and today and hopefully more to come.

They are definately positive and have/will be buying more. They saw something obviously. I have not taken any flights to the studio and have seen nothing that they have seen. I have sold about 80% of my holdings and now only hold 980K shares.

I am going to hit straight at the heart about the long term business of QTN. Yes we all know that Frank is a crook. The real truth is that this guy is a convict and has a lengthy criminal record. Some may not agree but i think its safe to say IMO that he purposely mislead (and maybe flat out lied) to suck all the potential investors in he could. End result we are at .0001.

Now thats not my point, and i am NOT doing this to bash all the friends i have made on this board, nor the investment that i have been involved with for the past 8 months.

I bring this up, because i want to have a constructful debate with many of the members on this board. We have all heard that about the 640B potential money with the GLBT community and have seen the good programming on QTN. Yes i agree it is a great idea to have a channel for the GLBT and at first thought it was a big moneymaker.
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
About Itespirt.

While im not going to comment on all the recent attacks on him, i will say that i follow his posts on IHUB and he is Somebody that you want on your side. He knows quite a bit about the situation we are in and speaks about how to get out of our current situation. He may be a bit edgy but he is not afraid to say what is on his mind.

Right now everyone has to understand that we are at .0001. Cant go any lower without a Reverse Split. Yes everyones emotions are high, as they should be, but Itespirit does mean well IMO.

I am not saying that he isn't right. The thing is, he doesn't KNOW he is right either. Posting assumptions as if they are facts. Even if you can back up the reasons for your assumptions, it doesn't make them facts and to present them as such is crap.
 
Posted by milliam on :
 
I agree with Bige2533...I expected a bit more of a report on the trip, but I'm will to wait to see if we do get more. I don't blame anyone for not wanting to get in trouble!!!

BTW, just wondering here...(NOT IMPLYING ANY WRONG DOING) if they did see some information that isn't public, how can they still be trading the stock. Wouldn't this be insider trading? Again, don't get me wrong, I don't think these guys are doing anything wrong, I'm just wondering how the system works.

Planning on adding more to my 6.75mil once Ameritrade clears my money!
 
Posted by JimS on :
 
I originally bought Q in May 1998 at .015/sh. I have been fortunate to average down to .0012/sh. As you can imagine I am down considerable on this. I appreciate what Imak and Doc have done. In my opinion, the most significant thing they have said is they will hold. Over the past years many others who have visited the Q have expressed the same good feelings that IMAK and Doc indicated about what was happening. Jen and others have witnessed first hand the phenomenal growth of Q. The busy studio, the positive attitude of the staff, etc. This information has all been presented to us in the past. We tend to get excited about it for awhile and then the excitment wanes and we start whining again. We bash the pr's, the IR firm, Frank (personal assaults - how many really know Frank personally, I don't by the way, never met him), the website, the PPS. Then we attack each other. Seemingly out of total frustration.
In my opinion Q is setting records as far as being one of the fastest growing television networks in history. There does not appear to be a "downside" of Q. I, like the rest of you, would like to see the audit; would like to see the PPS go up so I can make some money. In good time, it will all happen. I am riding this to the top or to the bottom whichever occurs first.
Pinks are a scary propect. Everyone who invested in pinks should be aware of that.
Thanks IMAC and DOC. I know I am rambling here and hope I didn't bore anyone. Unfortunately, I am fully invested and don't have any more funds to apply to Q or I certainly would. Hang in there longs.
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
Now dont stone me to death please. But i am going to go against Docs and Imak's very positive posts from last night and today and hopefully more to come.

They are definately positive and have/will be buying more. They saw something obviously. I have not taken any flights to the studio and have seen nothing that they have seen. I have sold about 80% of my holdings and now only hold 980K shares.

I am going to hit straight at the heart about the long term business of QTN. Yes we all know that Frank is a crook. The real truth is that this guy is a convict and has a lengthy criminal record. Some may not agree but i think its safe to say IMO that he purposely mislead (and maybe flat out lied) to suck all the potential investors in he could. End result we are at .0001.

Now thats not my point, and i am NOT doing this to bash all the friends i have made on this board, nor the investment that i have been involved with for the past 8 months.

I bring this up, because i want to have a constructful debate with many of the members on this board. We have all heard that about the 640B potential money with the GLBT community and have seen the good programming on QTN. Yes i agree it is a great idea to have a channel for the GLBT and at first thought it was a big moneymaker.

I don't think Doc's and Imak's posting should be viewed as positive or negative by anyone but themselves.

Again, it would not be official either way.
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Esteban99:
I don't believe a market order with *most* institutions will be able to give you 5 digits. They just aren't set up for it.

Esteban
I agree with what you're saying: most broker systems don't accept that many decimals, and my broker will not allow me to place such orders.

But I actually have had trades go through with the extra decimal, when I've offered to sell shares at a price that ended up being slightly lower than the current bid (ask was .0002 and I ended up with .00021).

Apparently some brokers do allow that many decimals ... maybe those that specialize in pinkies? Anyone use a broker that allows an extra decimal?
 
Posted by JimS on :
 
sorry, my last post should be "originally bought Q in May 2004 at .015/sh" Don't know where I got 1998 from. lol. My bad!
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
Oh well. I added 6 mil more today. In for a penny, in for a pound! [Smile]

Glutton for punishment
 
Posted by ltesprit on :
 
QBID'n, if you really want it that bad, turn to the west and click your ruby slippers two times! [Wink] 'Atta girl
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
Yes we can debate MT. But wouldn't that be going in circles? Isn't that what's been going on for quite sometime now?

We have positive longs, negative bashers and no official documentation. What else is there to debate?
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ltesprit:
QBID'n, if you really want it that bad, turn to the west and click your ruby slippers two times! [Wink] 'Atta girl

All the girly sh*t aside...you should be thankful your not in front of me right now.
 
Posted by a4realguy on :
 
Exactly.. all we have is opinion and speculation which have been debated and re-debated and over-debated for several months now.. until we have some basis of facts.. this thread is mainly a social gathering... for debate.. lol


quote:
Originally posted by QBID'n:
Yes we can debate MT. But wouldn't that be going in circles? Isn't that what's been going on for quite sometime now?

We have positive longs, negative bashers and no official documentation. What else is there to debate?


 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
MillerTIME ... you have a PM.
 
Posted by Sam1959 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by JimS:
[QB]I know I am rambling here and hope I didn't bore anyone./QB]

Don't worry; that was a very good post.
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
But don't get me wrong MT...because I'm probably one of the biggest believers in TMM.

I'm just patiently waiting for the numbers.
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
It's hard to see the woods when you are in the trees... some of us see what we want when it comes to with QBID. The glass is half full or the glass is half empty. It does not matter - it is still half. Rose colored glasses or cold hard facts?
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
BUT

and again i do this for the purpose of bringing out the truth and having a constructful debate.

I dont really know how to word what i have been thinking for a while now, so it may come out in bunches, but here i go.

First lets start off with the burn rate. Frank has said earlier that it was $1M. Now i guess we will go with that, although a good arguement could be made that Frank has lied about 80% of numbers he has said in the past. That 1M dollar burn rate was said many many months ago, before the hirings of many of the new members of QTN. Randy vaughn (lawyer) sandara Bernhard, Steve Kmetko, Robbie Laughlin, etc. And the addition of new shows and better programming. So i think its safe to say for the purpose of this debate that the burn rate per month is somewhere between $2-3M dollars. (Also take into account that Doc said he saw maybe double as many employees from the fall. If i recall correctly.

Number two, we will not include advertisers in this debate for 2 reasons. Number 1, currently the advertisers are questionable, if best. And number two, Scott withers has said they will be getting rid of advertisers because its pay tv.

Number three, subscribers. The main revenue stream is subs, subs, subs. In the recent article from the Financial times from this monday, Frank Olson, said and i quote "they only expect to get 1-2% subsribers from the homes they are in." WOW. 1-2%. Yes currently, we arent really making ANY money off the new carriers, BUT for the purpose of the debate we will say that new carriers immidately bring in profits. And ive heard before, that it will be half and half. Carriers get half of the 7.95 and network gets the other half.
---sooo. From the most recent PR, it said that with the launch of raliegh (or was it lincoln) it brought their total household reach to 3M houses. Not bad for a startup. 1-2% of 3M houses is a whopping 30-60K subsribers. Yes i did the math correclty. Multiply that by the $4 for every sub and you get 120K-240K dollars per month against the burn rate of 2-3M dollars.

And for the purpose of this debate, lets say they get 20M household reach by 2007. Thats 200K-400K subsribers. At $4 a sub and you get 800K-1.6M. Against the burn rate of 2-3M. Now thats not taking into account, that by 2007 their burnrate would probably be much much higher. Who knows maybe 4-5M.

2008 lets say they reach 40M houses. Thats 800K subs and 3.2M in revs. That would equal the burnrate of 2005-2006.

What im trying to get at is how exactly does Q television Network expect to EVER become profitable.

And in addition that line about breakeven in jan 2006 and profitable by may 2006 by Frank olsen, is a Straight up LIE IMO.

Now the reason i put this out is because i wanna know if im missing something or how they expect to make money, and because i wanna have a good debate on this. These are the issues at hand
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
Oh well. I added 6 mil more today. In for a penny, in for a pound! [Smile]

Glutton for punishment

Hoss I just wished I had my tax refund right now.
 
Posted by davidjanas on :
 
if the pps falls to 0001 at the close i will tell you guys some info ..because frankly ,,,like doc and imak,,i heard and seen many postive things at the studios..bu the fact is that as long as the pps isnt higher than all the words i have heard could have been bullshi#.
so if frank wants to leave me with a sour stomach for the weekend with 0001,,im gonna tell you guys what he said...if it stays at 0002 ..ill be quiet for one more week [Smile]

im what u call borderline right now....yes..i went to the studios and got a parade from frank....i dont trust frank..i have a meeting with him at the end of this month to "see how things have changed" in franks words.
bottomline is...like i told frank....i only care about the money i put it..i told frank that i could care less for his life time dream..im sure a lot of people have put pressure on frank...thats why hes not even in his office half the time....im not gonna sugarcoat it....its ugly...and thats why i didnt care when i told frank i dont care about his dream...i just care about the pps. im pissed because they didnt even get to talk to frank...randy vahan is a new lawyer with q...he really knows nothing about share structure or anything related to the stock. he definately is a tight lipped guy that doesnt release any information.. frank is the opposite...he will tell you everything...only problem is it never comes true..
 
Posted by ltesprit on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by milliam:
BTW, just wondering here...(NOT IMPLYING ANY WRONG DOING) if they did see some information that isn't public, how can they still be trading the stock. Wouldn't this be insider trading?

Hey, more folks are catching on...!

Just a few here are still in denial. They're more concerned about what they want to believe than what is likely. Apparently, Doc and Imak weren't shown the audit or other docs they went down to see. They have not mentioned them, nor did they indicate they signed an NDA regarding them, and they are still trading QBID shares.

If you check my posts I must have thanked Doc and Imak at least several times for their time, expense, effort, etc, nor asked them for anything...

Theere are a few folks here in denial and projecting their anger. Remember: don't invest angry!
 
Posted by ltesprit on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by QBID'n:
All the girly sh*t aside...

Well I'm glad you cleared that up. I thought you were going to take your hula-hoop and go home [Wink]
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
ltesprit
Where is Lumberg, OH?
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
Huh?....to get involved in all of what TMM/QTN is today and not make money?
 
Posted by davidjanas on :
 
as far as the nda goes..all they really do is take a copy of the drivers license before u talk to randy vahan...thats about it..they dont tell you that u cant trade the stock or anything close to that
 
Posted by davidjanas on :
 
the reason im posting is because so many people are off the mark...and i hate to see people that lost..lol
 
Posted by mydream1 on :
 
Looks many of us are beginning to face the fact.
We don't care about GREAT NETWORK.We just want our money back. [Smile] 0.0001 dumpping continued.Why?? Is this a signal for R/S?who knows.
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
Now how hard was it to use words such as "likely" and "apparently"? [Big Grin]

Denial means not seeing it for what it is. And as of right now I just don't want anyone but Doc and Monkey telling me what they were told! The whole reason QBID people get pissed with Q in general is not knowing verifiable facts.

Facts are good!
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
Hey Itsspit answer this to prove yourself a dumbazz.

Why do you want to see what they found out?

Don't twist and belly up now.
 
Posted by a4realguy on :
 
Very Good analysis. And while we can debate your supposition for yet another year, in then end, only the management of TMM can answer your questions. And even in that case, most likely not truthfully. If there is any good news, perhaps it is that revenues are derrived from other sources besides monthly subscriptions... I beleive they have a Movie library that is a revenue stream, as well as the uplink facilities, etc... so even if QTV can't make a profit for sometime, I SUPPOSE it is possible that QBID(TMM) can.


quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
BUT

and again i do this for the purpose of bringing out the truth and having a constructful debate.

I dont really know how to word what i have been thinking for a while now, so it may come out in bunches, but here i go.

First lets start off with the burn rate. Frank has said earlier that it was $1M. Now i guess we will go with that, although a good arguement could be made that Frank has lied about 80% of numbers he has said in the past. That 1M dollar burn rate was said many many months ago, before the hirings of many of the new members of QTN. Randy vaughn (lawyer) sandara Bernhard, Steve Kmetko, Robbie Laughlin, etc. And the addition of new shows and better programming. So i think its safe to say for the purpose of this debate that the burn rate per month is somewhere between $2-3M dollars. (Also take into account that Doc said he saw maybe double as many employees from the fall. If i recall correctly.

Number two, we will not include advertisers in this debate for 2 reasons. Number 1, currently the advertisers are questionable, if best. And number two, Scott withers has said they will be getting rid of advertisers because its pay tv.

Number three, subscribers. The main revenue stream is subs, subs, subs. In the recent article from the Financial times from this monday, Frank Olson, said and i quote "they only expect to get 1-2% subsribers from the homes they are in." WOW. 1-2%. Yes currently, we arent really making ANY money off the new carriers, BUT for the purpose of the debate we will say that new carriers immidately bring in profits. And ive heard before, that it will be half and half. Carriers get half of the 7.95 and network gets the other half.
---sooo. From the most recent PR, it said that with the launch of raliegh (or was it lincoln) it brought their total household reach to 3M houses. Not bad for a startup. 1-2% of 3M houses is a whopping 30-60K subsribers. Yes i did the math correclty. Multiply that by the $4 for every sub and you get 120K-240K dollars per month against the burn rate of 2-3M dollars.

And for the purpose of this debate, lets say they get 20M household reach by 2007. Thats 200K-400K subsribers. At $4 a sub and you get 800K-1.6M. Against the burn rate of 2-3M. Now thats not taking into account, that by 2007 their burnrate would probably be much much higher. Who knows maybe 4-5M.

2008 lets say they reach 40M houses. Thats 800K subs and 3.2M in revs. That would equal the burnrate of 2005-2006.

What im trying to get at is how exactly does Q television Network expect to EVER become profitable.

And in addition that line about breakeven in jan 2006 and profitable by may 2006 by Frank olsen, is a Straight up LIE IMO.

Now the reason i put this out is because i wanna know if im missing something or how they expect to make money, and because i wanna have a good debate on this. These are the issues at hand


 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by QBID'n:
quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
Now dont stone me to death please. But i am going to go against Docs and Imak's very positive posts from last night and today and hopefully more to come.

They are definately positive and have/will be buying more. They saw something obviously. I have not taken any flights to the studio and have seen nothing that they have seen. I have sold about 80% of my holdings and now only hold 980K shares.

I am going to hit straight at the heart about the long term business of QTN. Yes we all know that Frank is a crook. The real truth is that this guy is a convict and has a lengthy criminal record. Some may not agree but i think its safe to say IMO that he purposely mislead (and maybe flat out lied) to suck all the potential investors in he could. End result we are at .0001.

Now thats not my point, and i am NOT doing this to bash all the friends i have made on this board, nor the investment that i have been involved with for the past 8 months.

I bring this up, because i want to have a constructful debate with many of the members on this board. We have all heard that about the 640B potential money with the GLBT community and have seen the good programming on QTN. Yes i agree it is a great idea to have a channel for the GLBT and at first thought it was a big moneymaker.

I don't think Doc's and Imak's posting should be viewed as positive or negative by anyone but themselves.

Again, it would not be official either way.

your Right QBID'n. i should allow DOC and IMAK to speak for themselves. It was rude to speak for them, and i take my comment back.
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
With all the bickering going on has anybody been watching the trades? Since last Fri and this week we have had huge volume with the majority of trades being buys (range about 80-90%)- granted at .0002, but all buys none the less. Today's ratio has been about 90-95% buys. Someone is doing a lot of buying or a bunch of newbies are getting "suckered in" Or the MM's are "f*&^%ing with us.
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
With all the bickering going on has anybody been watching the trades? Since last Fri and this week we have had huge volume with the majority of trades being buys (range about 80-90%)- granted at .0002, but all buys none the less. Today's ratio has been about 90-95% buys. Someone is doing a lot of buying or a bunch of newbies are getting "suckered in" Or the MM's are "f*&^%ing with us.

Correct, there has been quite a lot of buying going on today.

LOL, i do hope that somebody paints to tape with a minute to go and we close at .0001 so that davidjanas will spill the beans!
 
Posted by davidjanas on :
 
5 mins to close
 
Posted by mydream1 on :
 
Although I still hold a bunch this junk.I wish it closes 0001 TODAY.Because davidjanas will say some thing. [Smile]
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
With all the bickering going on has anybody been watching the trades? Since last Fri and this week we have had huge volume with the majority of trades being buys (range about 80-90%)- granted at .0002, but all buys none the less. Today's ratio has been about 90-95% buys. Someone is doing a lot of buying or a bunch of newbies are getting "suckered in" Or the MM's are "f*&^%ing with us.

Dew MT is the best chart go-to-guy I know of so maybe getting his input as to who are possibly making those buys, MM's or whoever, you can get an answer.
 
Posted by mydream1 on :
 
0001.Come on,davidjanas.Say some thing. [Wink]
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by davidjanas:
5 mins to close

I got 2 guesses.

1.Morgan Stanely backed off of their Loan for QTN
2.TMM is going to decalre bankruptcy
 
Posted by Wangdo on :
 
DJ..see ya next week buddy:)
 
Posted by mydream1 on :
 
Closed at 0001
 
Posted by ltesprit on :
 
Releasing a credible audit in its entirety with numbers showing 'several hundred million' in assets with only ten million or so in debt would send the stock up to tenths of a penny. Olsen hasn't done that, so you can safely assume he can't.

Why? We can specuate intelligently, especially those in finance who work with audits every day. A likely possibility is that it contradicts what he's said earlier about QTN ownership and asset values (which would explain the most recent PRs).
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
If I recall correctly, that was the rumor...that was going around on Ihub a couple of months ago.

quote:
Originally posted by ltesprit:
A likely possibility is that it contradicts what he's said earlier about QTN ownership and asset values (which would explain the most recent PRs).


 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
davidjanas, Frank is dumping 9M share blocks at .0001 currently 17 blocks. That should leave you with a sour taste! LOL. Come on!
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ltesprit:
Releasing a credible audit in its entirety with numbers showing 'several hundred million' in assets with only ten million or so in debt would send the stock up to tenths of a penny. Olsen hasn't done that, so you can safely assume he can't.

Why? We can specuate intelligently, especially those in finance who work with audits every day. A likely possibility is that it contradicts what he's said earlier about QTN ownership and asset values (which would explain the most recent PRs).

I knew you would twist. I was right.
 
Posted by mydream1 on :
 
A/H, huge dump at 0001 [Frown]
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
So much for my observation of 90-95% buys today, 400M trades posted A/H as sells at at .0001. Final Vol is 2.05B. That is still roughly about 70-75% buys today.
 
Posted by ltesprit on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
Now how hard was it to use words such as "likely" and "apparently"? [Big Grin]

From my first post to Doc and Imak today, at 10:14 am: From your posts though it appears that you did not get the chance to see the audit or meet with management and take them to task for the confusion and uncertainty surround our investment. Did they bait-and-switch you on your arrival?

My next post, at 10:39 am: Apparently they only had to sign an NDA for the meeting regarding the Gay Olympics. They weren't shown the audit or any other papers they had a legal right to see. That's disappointing.

You guys are in denial. Take chill pill. If someone says something you don't want to believe, don't get your hackles up: you just might have misread them.
 
Posted by mydream1 on :
 
Looks Frank want davidjanas to say some thing. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
DJ, whats the scoop.
 
Posted by bige2533 on :
 
They would need quality advertisers, if they continue to run ads on a pay channel. If not, they would have to go global or syndicate shows to global gay networks.

quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
BUT

and again i do this for the purpose of bringing out the truth and having a constructful debate.

I dont really know how to word what i have been thinking for a while now, so it may come out in bunches, but here i go.

First lets start off with the burn rate. Frank has said earlier that it was $1M. Now i guess we will go with that, although a good arguement could be made that Frank has lied about 80% of numbers he has said in the past. That 1M dollar burn rate was said many many months ago, before the hirings of many of the new members of QTN. Randy vaughn (lawyer) sandara Bernhard, Steve Kmetko, Robbie Laughlin, etc. And the addition of new shows and better programming. So i think its safe to say for the purpose of this debate that the burn rate per month is somewhere between $2-3M dollars. (Also take into account that Doc said he saw maybe double as many employees from the fall. If i recall correctly.

Number two, we will not include advertisers in this debate for 2 reasons. Number 1, currently the advertisers are questionable, if best. And number two, Scott withers has said they will be getting rid of advertisers because its pay tv.

Number three, subscribers. The main revenue stream is subs, subs, subs. In the recent article from the Financial times from this monday, Frank Olson, said and i quote "they only expect to get 1-2% subsribers from the homes they are in." WOW. 1-2%. Yes currently, we arent really making ANY money off the new carriers, BUT for the purpose of the debate we will say that new carriers immidately bring in profits. And ive heard before, that it will be half and half. Carriers get half of the 7.95 and network gets the other half.
---sooo. From the most recent PR, it said that with the launch of raliegh (or was it lincoln) it brought their total household reach to 3M houses. Not bad for a startup. 1-2% of 3M houses is a whopping 30-60K subsribers. Yes i did the math correclty. Multiply that by the $4 for every sub and you get 120K-240K dollars per month against the burn rate of 2-3M dollars.

And for the purpose of this debate, lets say they get 20M household reach by 2007. Thats 200K-400K subsribers. At $4 a sub and you get 800K-1.6M. Against the burn rate of 2-3M. Now thats not taking into account, that by 2007 their burnrate would probably be much much higher. Who knows maybe 4-5M.

2008 lets say they reach 40M houses. Thats 800K subs and 3.2M in revs. That would equal the burnrate of 2005-2006.

What im trying to get at is how exactly does Q television Network expect to EVER become profitable.

And in addition that line about breakeven in jan 2006 and profitable by may 2006 by Frank olsen, is a Straight up LIE IMO.

Now the reason i put this out is because i wanna know if im missing something or how they expect to make money, and because i wanna have a good debate on this. These are the issues at hand


 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
QBID'n ... you have a PM.
 
Posted by Sam1959 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
Now the reason i put this out is because i wanna know if im missing something or how they expect to make money, and because i wanna have a good debate on this. These are the issues at hand

The only point I would debate is how many households they will be in and the number of subscribers for 2006 and 2007. I see what you are saying, but if they land a deal with Direct-TV or Dish Network, the number of households they are available in and therefore the number of subscribers could really jump. I also think that word of mouth (friends recommendations, etc.) could have more of an exponential growth than linear (if the quality of programming is very good). Basically success can result in even more success, both with friends telling friends and cable companies sharing positive information, (hopefully) the growth will be more exponential than linear.

I won’t get into numbers or anything, but you probably get my drift.
 
Posted by Dew-it on :
 
Two scoops of raisins in every box..Post Raisin brand. LOL!

quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
DJ, whats the scoop.


 
Posted by 4Tune4Me on :
 
486.74 +/- traded afterhours...I would say since we are sitting at .0001 and most trading houses don't go to five digits that the Dilution Master Plan much be just about complete.
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
haven't you ever heard of a pooper scooper?


quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
Two scoops of raisins in every box..Post Raisin brand. LOL!

quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
DJ, whats the scoop.



 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ltesprit:
quote:
Now you are just making stuff up.
I wish I was. They signed one NDA and it was regarding the Gay Games meeting (stop calling people liars and see his earlier post...). There was no NDA for the audit because they were not shown the audit. If they were shown the audit he would have said so. Instead, they were given a tour of the facilities and got to meet some folks and were given the song-and-dance that the 'network is going great!!' They were treated like tourists instead of concerned shareholders, and most of us are susceptible to that. We avoid issues and confrontation.

You can apologize to me later, unless you want to avoid the issue.

Bringing this up.
Your first posts did say that you were making assumptions. Then you ran with it and made posts like this as if your assumptions had been confirmed.

Not in denial. I just have to look at my account balance to bring me back to reality! LOL
I don't like it when folks tell me everything is going to be peachy as if it's a fact either.

I don't mind negative/positive discussions. I jumped on DJ a while back for making positive predictions as if facts also. I can be an ***hole to both sides!! [Big Grin]
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ltesprit:
Davidjanas wrote:
quote:
i have a meeting with him at the end of this month to "see how things have changed" in franks words.
The problem is, David, Frank will be right. Things WILL have changed. The channel is evolving and growing.

He doesn't consider your concerns as a shareholder. He thinks, or wants to think, that your concern is with Q, which isn't the same as the security called 'QBID'. They're related, but not the same.

So when you go that meeting, don't just tell him you care about 'your money'. Tell him your concerns as a shareholder: the audit, regular reporting, voting rights, an independent board... Things that make a security 'secure' and - hence - valuable. (Yes, finance students, it's not all about 'free cash flow'. The security of that potential cash flow and how it accrues to the shares outstanding is also important. You're learning that now.)

I cal that turkey every day, and every day the receptionist takes my message. She's a sweetheart and seems to sympathize with my efforts to talk to him. He's clearly dodging shareholders. I hope others that do get to talk to him are able to succinctly express their concerns as investors.

Good luck to you!

I TOLD YOU GUYS THIS TWIT WAS A DUMBAZZ!!

Now he's calling Doc and Imak dumbazzes.
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
Itsspit Q's concerns can be debated around the programming itself, everyone knows that. They went there for there own personal investment issues regarding numbers.

Or did you forget...Frank has those numbers. And he's there, not in Washington.
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Deg's wife:
... Us 'oldies'

Robin
... and very very "goodies", I might add. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
some older then others [Big Grin]

quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by Deg's wife:
... Us 'oldies'

Robin
... and very very "goodies", I might add. [Big Grin]


 
Posted by Deg's wife on :
 
LOL
 
Posted by mattbarrett on :
 
Hey, davidjanas you got ur .0002 close.

Also, davidjanas I really enjoy your posts. You have a very realistic view point, something that is hard to find on this board, or any board in that manner. I got a **** load in Q right now. I repositioned myself a couple weeks ago, so i can basically jump out soon, but i feel we got a long ways till the PS starts to climb. I would go a far to say the Gay Games.

As for QTN being successful, i could really care less about that too. I made an investment. Risky, but still an researched investment, and i all i want to see is the PS move.

davidjanas when you meet with frank ask that sly man why the hell is there so many god damn shares out there. ANd where did all of his shareholder promises go.
 
Posted by Jennifercd10 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by JimS:
I originally bought Q in May 1998 at .015/sh. I have been fortunate to average down to .0012/sh. As you can imagine I am down considerable on this. I appreciate what Imak and Doc have done. In my opinion, the most significant thing they have said is they will hold. Over the past years many others who have visited the Q have expressed the same good feelings that IMAK and Doc indicated about what was happening. Jen and others have witnessed first hand the phenomenal growth of Q. The busy studio, the positive attitude of the staff, etc. This information has all been presented to us in the past. We tend to get excited about it for awhile and then the excitment wanes and we start whining again. We bash the pr's, the IR firm, Frank (personal assaults - how many really know Frank personally, I don't by the way, never met him), the website, the PPS. Then we attack each other. Seemingly out of total frustration.
In my opinion Q is setting records as far as being one of the fastest growing television networks in history. There does not appear to be a "downside" of Q. I, like the rest of you, would like to see the audit; would like to see the PPS go up so I can make some money. In good time, it will all happen. I am riding this to the top or to the bottom whichever occurs first.
Pinks are a scary propect. Everyone who invested in pinks should be aware of that.
Thanks IMAC and DOC. I know I am rambling here and hope I didn't bore anyone. Unfortunately, I am fully invested and don't have any more funds to apply to Q or I certainly would. Hang in there longs.

Hi Jim…
I totally agree. I haven’t said anything about Doc and Imaknony’s trip to BUR, but I will soon. I’m also fully invested, but my friends have been buying most of the day. There were some great lines in what they said that gives me confirmation on my investment. I too am doing the “Happy Dance”.
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by Deg's wife:
... Us 'oldies'

Robin
... and very very "goodies", I might add. [Big Grin]

I am appalled that you could post something even remotely humorous or even borderline friendly while some of us are in the midst of having a good argument! Or at least an argument anyways...

[Big Grin]
 
Posted by Deg's wife on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by Deg's wife:
... Us 'oldies'

Robin
... and very very "goodies", I might add. [Big Grin]

I am appalled that you could post something even remotely humorous or even borderline friendly while some of us are in the midst of having a good argument! Or at least an argument anyways...

[Big Grin]

Stick around Hoss...it gets better [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jennifercd10:
... I haven’t said anything about Doc and Imaknony’s trip to BUR, but I will soon. I’m also fully invested, but my friends have been buying most of the day. There were some great lines in what they said that gives me confirmation on my investment. I too am doing the “Happy Dance”.

Jenn
Thanks for the positive post ... your opinion always makes me feel better about Q, and I look forward to your additional comments. [Smile]
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
The humor or the argument?! LMAO


Either way, consider me stuck!
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
and now for your viewing pleasure
THE HAPPY DANCE!!!

 -
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ltesprit:
quote:
Originally posted by QBID'n:
I TOLD YOU GUYS THIS TWIT WAS A DUMBAZZ!!
Now he's calling Doc and Imak dumbazzes.

I really got in your kitchen, didn't I? [Wink] Too funny!

Just relax. Everything is going to be fine. No one's making you look like a 'dumbazz.' [Cool]

But I finally proved you are a dumbazz. [Wink]
 
Posted by ltesprit on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ltesprit:
Releasing a credible audit in its entirety with numbers showing 'several hundred million' in assets with only ten million or so in debt would send the stock up to tenths of a penny. Olsen hasn't done that, so you can safely assume he can't.

Why? We can speculate intelligently, especially those in finance who work with audits every day. A likely possibility is that it contradicts what he's said earlier about QTN ownership and asset values (which would explain the most recent PRs).


 
Posted by mattbarrett on :
 
Monopoly Money that dance cracked me up
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ltesprit:
quote:
Originally posted by ltesprit:
Releasing a credible audit in its entirety with numbers showing 'several hundred million' in assets with only ten million or so in debt would send the stock up to tenths of a penny. Olsen hasn't done that, so you can safely assume he can't.

Why? We can speculate intelligently, especially those in finance who work with audits every day. A likely possibility is that it contradicts what he's said earlier about QTN ownership and asset values (which would explain the most recent PRs).


Maybe you should of thought that one out a bit longer...remember twit, everything i.e.,PR's, the CC from day one has been put out to his own satisfaction. It's not expected to be accurate...and why?

Come on...I know you got it in you.
 
Posted by Jennifercd10 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by Jennifercd10:
... I haven’t said anything about Doc and Imaknony’s trip to BUR, but I will soon. I’m also fully invested, but my friends have been buying most of the day. There were some great lines in what they said that gives me confirmation on my investment. I too am doing the “Happy Dance”.

Jenn
Thanks for the positive post ... your opinion always makes me feel better about Q, and I look forward to your additional comments. [Smile]

No one gets cheesecake in Las Vegas without FIRST doing the Happy Dance! Noah your next!
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
?
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
Happy dance instructions [Smile]

quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
and now for your viewing pleasure
THE HAPPY DANCE!!!

 -


 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jennifercd10:
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by Jennifercd10:
... I haven’t said anything about Doc and Imaknony’s trip to BUR, but I will soon. I’m also fully invested, but my friends have been buying most of the day. There were some great lines in what they said that gives me confirmation on my investment. I too am doing the “Happy Dance”.

Jenn
Thanks for the positive post ... your opinion always makes me feel better about Q, and I look forward to your additional comments. [Smile]

No one gets cheesecake in Las Vegas without FIRST doing the Happy Dance! Noah your next!
Hey Jen will the "Two Step" do?
 
Posted by freebird68nj on :
 
I do believe it's "Kellogg's Raisan Bran"

[Big Grin] [Smile]

quote:
Originally posted by Dew-it:
Two scoops of raisins in every box..Post Raisin brand. LOL!

quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
DJ, whats the scoop.



 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
yep see the 2 scoops
 -
 
Posted by Jennifercd10 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by QBID'n:
quote:
Originally posted by Jennifercd10:
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by Jennifercd10:
... I haven’t said anything about Doc and Imaknony’s trip to BUR, but I will soon. I’m also fully invested, but my friends have been buying most of the day. There were some great lines in what they said that gives me confirmation on my investment. I too am doing the “Happy Dance”.

Jenn
Thanks for the positive post ... your opinion always makes me feel better about Q, and I look forward to your additional comments. [Smile]

No one gets cheesecake in Las Vegas without FIRST doing the Happy Dance! Noah your next!
Hey Jen will the "Two Step" do?
Yes... and a smile on your face.
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
MM did you notice that some one is going thru the pages, removing your pictures?
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
nah i think theres something wrong with my ftp server, since i left home i havent been able to access it from here, so ive been useing local sources. I'll have to fix it tonight. Sorry i have no idea what the problem is. I'll get them back up
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
Ooooh oooh!

 -
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
Thanks for the warning. [Big Grin]

d
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
nah i think theres something wrong with my ftp server, since i left home i havent been able to access it from here, so ive been useing local sources. I'll have to fix it tonight. Sorry i have no idea what the problem is. I'll get them back up


 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
i actually thought about that one for happy dance but i find that other one and was sold [Big Grin] .... good find.

quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
Ooooh oooh!

 -


 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
MT-My recommendation would be for Q to keep the advertising as long as they can and get the biggest sponsors. If thats possible it might compensate for any lag in subscription numbers.IMO. WTF
 
Posted by ltesprit on :
 
Here me knockin'? I'm in your kiiiitchen.... [Eek!]
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
Hear? or here?

quote:
Originally posted by ltesprit:
Here me knockin'? I'm in your kiiiitchen.... [Eek!]


 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by QBID'n:
quote:
Originally posted by ltesprit:
QBID'n, if you really want it that bad, turn to the west and click your ruby slippers two times! [Wink] 'Atta girl

All the girly sh*t aside...you should be thankful your not in front of me right now.
Woah, QBID'n... That was an ******* thing to say on Itesprit's part, but you should take your own advice you gave to me not too long ago about staying calm. Ah, well.. **** it, kick his ass if you have to. haha [Big Grin]
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
i actually thought about that one for happy dance but i find that other one and was sold [Big Grin] .... good find.


Yours was funnier, it just hit too close to home! [Big Grin]
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
Hear? or here?

quote:
Originally posted by ltesprit:
Here me knockin'? I'm in your kiiiitchen.... [Eek!]


Hey Itsspit, what happened to...."intelligently, especially those in finance who work with audits every day."

Not so intelligent now huh? [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by Deg's wife:
... Us 'oldies'

Robin
... and very very "goodies", I might add. [Big Grin]

I am appalled that you could post something even remotely humorous or even borderline friendly while some of us are in the midst of having a good argument! Or at least an argument anyways... [Big Grin]
HT
It's all a trick to seem friendly ... then we attack when their backs are turned. Right, Robin? [Big Grin]
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
Hello little buddy.
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ltesprit:
Here me knockin'? I'm in your kiiiitchen.... [Eek!]

Good! Fix me a pot pie!
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
ltesprit
Where is Lumberg, OH?

It's not on Google Local...
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by davidjanas:
5 mins to close

DJ PM...
 
Posted by behind the Q ball on :
 
revenue? fact #1 gay households earn on agverage of over 200,000 dollars a year. #2 gay households have fewer bills (children,Tuition,etc) #3 they have more buying power and often spend 10 times the amount on luxury items than traditional homes. EVERY maker of large luxury items on earth would love to advertise on an all Gay network . Especially one that reaches over a million gay homes.
 
Posted by Doctoall on :
 
I know that Imakmony will verify what I am about to say. First of all when we arrived at "Q" we were given a NDA by Egan to sign and we were told that we would not attend any formal meetings unless we signed the agreement.

If we signed the agreement, we would have not been able to post on these boards again as we would be considered to have inside information. Thus the clause in the agreement that we could be reported to the SEC and have our shares restricted for passing on any information.

That would also include conversations that we may have overheard while in the studio. We could have also attended the Gay Games meeting with the production staff, reps from Chic and also got updated by Carol Hinnant about potential carrier deals for the Gay Games.

But we decided that we wanted to continue to post and bring some information to the boards. So we meet with Randy and discussed the agreement and agreed that we would wait to connect with Richard Brown when he situates himself in Burbank.

I did not post that prior to my travel to Burbank that on Tuesday Jan 10th, I participated in a conference call with Frank Olson, Randy Vaghan and Egan and discussed many details prior to going to Burbank. I have every intention to follow up with that conference call.

I am not going to say anymore about the trip to Burbank on the boards. But I will say that I am satisfied with what I saw and was told and I will be holding my position in QBID.

As always it's your choice to do what you want with your money as it is my choice to do what I want with mine. This whole process has taken many hours from my practice, cost me money to travel to Burbank.

I know that there are many of you who appreciate our efforts and to you guys, it will be Vegas time.

If the PPS was moving up, those who are posting negative crap would care less about Frank and his pass as long as they were making money. But now they have found morals and ethics (just a boatload of crap).

So unless I come across some other information or someone brings some creditable DD to the board that would indicate that I should sell. I will continue to be a long in QBID. In retrospect maybe we should have signed the NDA.

Long, Strong and Holding [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Team Sleep on :
 
So where are these advertisers at? Why aren't they beating Q's door down to get a grip of all that gay money floating around?

And don't give me that line that Q is a non-commerical, HBO-type network. Because HBO-type networks make hundreds of millions from advertising, they just don't do it like traditional networks such as NBC/ABC/CBS.
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Team Sleep:
So where are these advertisers at? Why aren't they beating Q's door down to get a grip of all that gay money floating around?

And don't give me that line that Q is a non-commerical, HBO-type network. Because HBO-type networks make hundreds of millions from advertising, they just don't do it like traditional networks such as NBC/ABC/CBS.

You must not of seen PT's post. And as a matter of fact, you should already know why we should not have big numbers yet through any source.

We are still in an infancy stage. Give us time man. Its a long remember? Have patience.
 
Posted by Bigrod40 on :
 
[Smile] Doctoall

All I have to say is short and sweet.
Thank you for your time and effort, and the honesty in your above post. Very refreshing after all the crap posted today.

Have a good weekend.
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by QBID'n:
quote:
Originally posted by Team Sleep:
So where are these advertisers at? Why aren't they beating Q's door down to get a grip of all that gay money floating around?

And don't give me that line that Q is a non-commerical, HBO-type network. Because HBO-type networks make hundreds of millions from advertising, they just don't do it like traditional networks such as NBC/ABC/CBS.

You must not of seen PT's post. And as a matter of fact, you should already know why we should not have big numbers yet through any source.

We are still in an infancy stage. Give us time man. Its a long remember? Have patience.

hard to have patience when your rent money is on the line [Big Grin]
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
quote:
Originally posted by QBID'n:
quote:
Originally posted by Team Sleep:
So where are these advertisers at? Why aren't they beating Q's door down to get a grip of all that gay money floating around?

And don't give me that line that Q is a non-commerical, HBO-type network. Because HBO-type networks make hundreds of millions from advertising, they just don't do it like traditional networks such as NBC/ABC/CBS.

You must not of seen PT's post. And as a matter of fact, you should already know why we should not have big numbers yet through any source.

We are still in an infancy stage. Give us time man. Its a long remember? Have patience.

hard to have patience when your rent money is on the line [Big Grin]
Well you might want to ask the landlord if you can paint the windows in return for board. Because you won't be seeing green for a while. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
Hell he might even pay to jig a "Happy Dance" [Big Grin]
 
Posted by behind the Q ball on :
 
when the gay games are aired the advertising slots will create a bidding war for the choicest spots, and lets not forget that if anyone in the world both on TV and radio (sattelite)wants to air any part of any event thay must pay Q. WE OWN THE RIGHTS
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
Thank you Doc!!
 
Posted by Rich735 on :
 
Thanks Doc You Rock!!!! [Wink]
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
I would also like to thank both Imakmoney and doc for their time and efforts. You have both gone above and beyond the call of duty for shareholders.

I would also like to comment on my negativity today. I do not want to alienate myself and have everyone hate me for my posts. My posts are only my opinion and things can change in a matter of a few PR's. I have no solid information of what is going on behind the scenes of QTN.

There is 1 situation that could be happening that would be the BEST CASE for shareholders and i do wonder if it is happening. I wonder because if it were happenining, then i would miss out on a monster run.

THe best case, would be if Frank is truely not the one diluting any shares, but that he is the one buying them all back. If this is the case, which i personally doubt, then i, like many others are in for a huge surprise.

I am sorry and hope that many of you understand my position in posting like i have. I still would very much like to see the company suceed, LOL , if only for the fact to meet all of you guys in vegas.

Good luck to all, and have a good 3 day weekend!

thanks again to doc and imak
 
Posted by behind the Q ball on :
 
i might just get a boat with three propellers!
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
This isn't about Q, but its about TV.
Some food for thought for all of you tv network lovers.
The fight network is worth looking into for good potential of carriers in the US, besides the ones they get in Canada.
BKMP, i ran up 5k profit on it 2 weeks ago.
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
ltesprit
Where is Lumberg, OH?

It's not on Google Local...
mjm
I can't find it either. I'm from Ohio and have never heard of it, so I'm not sure it exists.

But a lot of people claim to be from Ohio ... because it gives them an "image of sophistication and intelligence". At least, that's why I continue to live here. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by behind the Q ball:
when the gay games are aired the advertising slots will create a bidding war for the choicest spots, and lets not forget that if anyone in the world both on TV and radio (sattelite)wants to air any part of any event thay must pay Q. WE OWN THE RIGHTS

During the GG our signal will be scrambled so that many other stations will be able to show the games as well. But at what cost, I don't know.
 
Posted by behind the Q ball on :
 
anyone showing the gg must pay royalties to the Q plus they'll rake in the advertising money which I hear are all lined up
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
ltesprit
Where is Lumberg, OH?

It's not on Google Local...
mjm
I can't find it either. I'm from Ohio and have never heard of it, so I'm not sure it exists.

But a lot of people claim to be from Ohio ... because it gives them an "image of sophistication and intelligence". At least, that's why I continue to live here. [Big Grin]

aahahahaa.. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by behind the Q ball on :
 
nothing says sophistication like downtown cleveland
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
I own a measly 13.5 mil shares of Q and I think it will stay that way. Most likely for good. That should be enough to make something you would think. If it was with any other network i'd be a billionaire, I don't know what I will be here, so far just a struggling investor. I'm holding to see where this goes. I can't bring myself to sell what costed me so much right now anyway. Its hard to just flush that kind of money out of my account, loss or not.
GO TFN! (the fight network)
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
... I would also like to comment on my negativity today. I do not want to alienate myself and have everyone hate me for my posts. My posts are only my opinion and things can change in a matter of a few PR's. I have no solid information of what is going on behind the scenes of QTN....I still would very much like to see the company suceed, LOL , if only for the fact to meet all of you guys in vegas.

MT
Damn ... just when I find a reason to "hate" you, you go and say something nice. Now I'm all confused. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
... I would also like to comment on my negativity today. I do not want to alienate myself and have everyone hate me for my posts. My posts are only my opinion and things can change in a matter of a few PR's. I have no solid information of what is going on behind the scenes of QTN....I still would very much like to see the company suceed, LOL , if only for the fact to meet all of you guys in vegas.

MT
Damn ... just when I find a reason to "hate" you, you go and say something nice. Now I'm all confused. [Big Grin]

Never crossed my mind MT. [Wink]
 
Posted by Numa on :
 
Here's my problem with Q...

Let's make the assumption that they are very successful, have many hours of programming, multiple state of the art studios and a good number of carriers.

I honestly think we will be there within a year, but the problem isn't the operations, it's the stock.

45 Billion confirmed in the OS, 100 billion AS, and a history of constantly increasing it. A CEO that blatantly misleads us and outright lies to us when asked straight forward questions (concerning his restricted shares, and the ownership of QTN by QBID.)

I think QTN will be successful, but I don't think QBID will ever pay out the way we wanted it to.
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
Move along little boy...playtime is over. We're done with your dumbazz.
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
Hat's off to you Bob.
 
Posted by ltesprit on :
 
Thanks Doc and Imak. I don't think anyone was too surprised about the NDAs, and it was great of you to choose the board over your own personal interests. (Your regret not withstanding...!)

I'm still fascinated by that news about Rich. I spoke with him at great length a few weeks ago and he was well aware of the shortcomings in this compay's corporate governance and how it affects the experienced investors/institutions perceptions and the pps. He expressed his frustration but reminded me that they keep his role limited on purpose. They can only feed him what they want shareholders to know. I suggested to Rich (and repeatedly to Frank via e-mail, which Frank had read according to Rich) that he (Rich) play a greater role in the company by professionalizing their IR and getting the company's governance policies up to exchange listing standards. Since Rich is moving to Burbank, I take that as a cue that Olsen is getting serious about such changes; I don't think Rich would consider such a move unless that were true.

I'm going to try to speak to Rich again and discuss this with him. His move is either a sign that the company is making big changes, or that Rich is a fool. I don't think Rich is a fool.
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Numa:
Here's my problem with Q...

Let's make the assumption that they are very successful, have many hours of programming, multiple state of the art studios and a good number of carriers.

I honestly think we will be there within a year, but the problem isn't the operations, it's the stock.

45 Billion confirmed in the OS, 100 billion AS, and a history of constantly increasing it. A CEO that blatantly misleads us and outright lies to us when asked straight forward questions (concerning his restricted shares, and the ownership of QTN by QBID.)

I think QTN will be successful, but I don't think QBID will ever pay out the way we wanted it to.

Hopefully Frank will voluntarily step up to the plate and present positive numbers. Then of course we will see the pps rise and be rewarded.

If not, and he is forced by legal actions, well then what happens at that point is anybody's guess.
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
Thanks Doc and Imak...again
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
woops
 
Posted by Doctoall on :
 
Check out our Honey Labrador. She was very hype about her movie that will be released in selected theatres this coming week-end.

The movie is called April's Shower and you can check it out at www.aprilsshower.com [Big Grin]

She plays Sasha.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Cousin IT LOL like I really trust what you say. What a joke. LOLOL
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Hi Doc. I hope you had some fun. Glad you are back safe and sound. As I said before. I won't touch this visit. GLTY and IMAK.
Sam
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
Whoa...excellent preview! Gotta see it.
 
Posted by Doctoall on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ltesprit:
Thanks Doc and Imak. I don't think anyone was too surprised about the NDAs, and it was great of you to choose the board over your own personal interests. (Your regret not withstanding...!)

I'm still fascinated by that news about Rich. I spoke with him at great length a few weeks ago and he was well aware of the shortcomings in this compay's corporate governance and how it affects the experienced investors/institutions perceptions and the pps. He expressed his frustration but reminded me that they keep his role limited on purpose. They can only feed him what they want shareholders to know. I suggested to Rich (and repeatedly to Frank via e-mail, which Frank had read according to Rich) that he (Rich) play a greater role in the company by professionalizing their IR and getting the company's governance policies up to exchange listing standards. Since Rich is moving to Burbank, I take that as a cue that Olsen is getting serious about such changes; I don't think Rich would consider such a move unless that were true.

I'm going to try to speak to Rich again and discuss this with him. His move is either a sign that the company is making big changes, or that Rich is a fool. I don't think Rich is a fool.

Your post is very factual, over the past 3 days both Imakmony and I have had numerous telephone conversations with Richard, at least 4 while we were at the studios. Richard was rather surprised when I spoke to him about the move because he did not think that anyone knew about it yet.
 
Posted by Doctoall on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by QBID'n:
Whoa...excellent preview! Gotta see it.

Man she was so happy yesterday, said that it was 3 years in the making [Big Grin]
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
Your both appreciated. Thanks guys.
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
My wife is gonna love it.

Nothing beats a mix of comedy and drama.
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
Hey...I just described my wife and I.

She's definately comedy and I'm all drama! [Big Grin]
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
Hey Doc did you get an update on the SelectTV programming?
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ltesprit:
Thanks Doc and Imak. I don't think anyone was too surprised about the NDAs, and it was great of you to choose the board over your own personal interests. (Your regret not withstanding...!)

I'm still fascinated by that news about Rich. I spoke with him at great length a few weeks ago and he was well aware of the shortcomings in this compay's corporate governance and how it affects the experienced investors/institutions perceptions and the pps. He expressed his frustration but reminded me that they keep his role limited on purpose. They can only feed him what they want shareholders to know. I suggested to Rich (and repeatedly to Frank via e-mail, which Frank had read according to Rich) that he (Rich) play a greater role in the company by professionalizing their IR and getting the company's governance policies up to exchange listing standards. Since Rich is moving to Burbank, I take that as a cue that Olsen is getting serious about such changes; I don't think Rich would consider such a move unless that were true.

I'm going to try to speak to Rich again and discuss this with him. His move is either a sign that the company is making big changes, or that Rich is a fool. I don't think Rich is a fool.

IT why do you keep raising hell and then come up with this? Geeez. What is up with you? This last post by you seemed intelligent and without emotion but you have been raising hell. Please stop the dramatics.
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
No worries Sam...he was put in his place. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Yep qb [Smile]
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
I think I jinxed the weather back here at home when I was bragging to you earlier about it.

Its been raining all day today. [Smile]
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
But no biggy...I been able to read and post all day. [Big Grin]

I'm off on Friday's anyways.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
LOL same here were you are. Getting chilly mikec . hehe
 
Posted by milliam on :
 
Thanks Doc for clearing all of this up.

It really sucks that yall went through all of that to get out there and have to choose between the meetings or posting on the boards. I think we can all be flattered that you chose the boards. Pretty ironic that Frank wants to make you sign a SEC binding agreement when he himself probably has a few things he wouldn't want the SEC to know about.

Thanks again to you and Mike for taking you time and funds for this trip and reporting back what you can.

Good luck on the future info gathering!!!

Tommy
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
We are supposed to stay warm through next week too. I reckon we just won't have a winter.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
I hope not. Just got a 460 buck gas bill [Frown] LOL
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
I hope not. Just got a 460 buck gas bill [Frown] LOL

My last one was $306, but that was for the holiday season. Had family and friends over many nights.

And then of course, there was my little firecracker of a grand daughter. She's always waking up in the middle of the night from in between me and 'nanny hollering to turn the heat up because she's cold. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by buckwheatbob on :
 
You seem to have a lot to say for someone who doesn't have the balls to go to Q and find out for yourself. Just a little man with a big mouth! Enough said.

quote:
Originally posted by Team Sleep:
Knowing these two guys would leave the meeting and issue a report to shareholders and potential shareholders, what do you think the CEO was going to tell them?

It's just like when the Prez holds a press conference... does he ever tell us all the bad decisions and retarded, behind-the-scenes crap that goes on? Of course not!

While we all applaud their efforts for all the shareholders, lets keep an open mind that the CEO probably did not want to divulge anything remotely negative.


 
Posted by firefly on :
 
LOL, gets cold in the peach. Bought a space heater for my den in this 1914 craftsmans bungalo.
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by QBID'n:
I think I jinxed the weather back here at home when I was bragging to you earlier about it.

Its been raining all day today. [Smile]

Yeah, same here... uhhh
 
Posted by Golf Money on :
 
Help me understand---why is everyone doing a dance?
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
Sam I went to look into the "1914 Craftsman's bungalo's on the web. I like what I saw. Looks to be a nice and cozy place. Sure would like to have one on the lake. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
It's nice. heart of pine floors and 3 coal fireplaces [Smile] . One is gas.
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Golf Money:
Help me understand---why is everyone doing a dance?

Because we just love Q/TMM!...can't you feel it?!!! [Big Grin]
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
ahhhh.....yes indeed.

My kind of lake house. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Golf Money on :
 
I can feel it---just can't see it.

Seems like a lot of Blind Faith.

If no NDA was signed, why no concrete info?
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
Going out for pizza. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
LOL Q a little 350k intown house.
 
Posted by stashu on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by buckwheatbob:
You seem to have a lot to say for someone who doesn't have the balls to go to Q and find out for yourself. Just a little man with a big mouth! Enough said.


Ohhhh, Tough Guy eh?
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
Well just read the posts from today Doc and myself got alot more info then we have let out and for now im sitting on mine, we do have more meetings coming and at that time i will be signing there paper work to become an insider as long as they meet my needs as well, This is IMHO the time to buy but only if you can handle losing that money would i say BUY, If you can and you can wait it out i feel very good about were you will be in say 1 year,but it could be next week as well, I will also say for myself that any day just might be the day i go inside and stop posting on the Q thread.You know maybe 15% of what took place on are trip to the Q. Just some food for the mind to ponder.
 
Posted by Ad astra on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Team Sleep:
So where are these advertisers at? Why aren't they beating Q's door down to get a grip of all that gay money floating around?

And don't give me that line that Q is a non-commerical, HBO-type network. Because HBO-type networks make hundreds of millions from advertising, they just don't do it like traditional networks such as NBC/ABC/CBS.

----------
Team-Could you flush out a bit how they make millions from advertising? Thanks in advance.
 
Posted by Golf Money on :
 
Imak-- I have to take your word for it. I am holding and as invested as a lot of us. Thanks for the follow up.

I would love to know what you know, but you put the effort in, and have the advantage.

Good luck to all.
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
I also would like to say (DOC) is one hell of a stand-up guy and look forword to more meetings with him and the Q.
 
Posted by IntheCurl on :
 
imakmoney.............Thankyou.......for all your efforts....I was wondering why you would go to all that trouble, and not sign the NDA....to see the real info....but, I think I understand, now that you say you probably will sign, and "go inside", while doc does not......beautiful..
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
EVERYONE DO THE HAPPY DANCE!!!
 -
 
Posted by ltesprit on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Doctoall:
Your post is very factual, over the past 3 days both Imakmony and I have had numerous telephone conversations with Richard, at least 4 while we were at the studios. Richard was rather surprised when I spoke to him about the move because he did not think that anyone knew about it yet.

I'm surprised Rich was at the studios, considering he's based on the east coast.

I know a lot of physicians (my father's one and two of my three brothers as well) and have known them to be prettttty bright. I feel a bit stupid having sunk 230 grand into this 'investment' (at .0018 average price), which is almost a sixth of my liquid investable funds. If I knew Olsen was going to play footsie with the audit I couldn't have run away from this stock fast enough. But it's always good to know other serious folks have a lot at stake here and are willing to see this disappointing episode through to some (meaningful) end.

I thank goodness I haven't gotten anyone else into this stock. I'm just hoping Rich is able to impress on them the importance of good corporate governance and making the right moves that will earn some credibility back with the Street. Because that's what is really missing here. The 'missing audit' is just a symptom of that underlying malady.
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
rich was NOT at the studios.
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
Telephone
 
Posted by ltesprit on :
 
I was particularly alarmed when Olsen made claims about billion-dollar libraries when that was, simply, mathematical impossible. His justifications, based on licensing revenues of $400K per year, just put it more obviously to the lie. If you do a simple NPV and assume a 10% CoC, you get a library value of around $4 million. Which is probably the equivalent (in stock) of what they paid.

I figured their assets were more around $100 million or so, and am pleased to hear it may be more than that, though only a credible audit can prove that. (!)

I'm still scratching my head over Olsen's recent claim that they would be break even by January 2006... More Olsen bombast and bluster? No doubt. At a burn rate of $2 million a month they'd need several hundred thousand subscribers and a heck of a lot of sponsors and advertisers to cover that nut. They ain't there yet.

It's vital that the audit be released, Olsen knows that, and the fact that he hasn't says to me that he can't. More alarms ringing there. I think Frank painted himself into a legal corner he's now trying to extricate from. You get hints of that in his latest PRs. Notice he's backing down from his library valuation claims and trying to clarify that QTN is 'now' a wholly-owned sub of TMM.
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
The film library takes up about 1,000 sq feet if not more.
 
Posted by ltesprit on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
Telephone

Thanks. Wow, four calls during your visit. You guys dating or something [Razz] He must be the jealous type
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
no during the visit id say 10 are more.
 
Posted by ltesprit on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
The film library takes up about 1,000 sq feet if not more.

I don't doubt it's big. I've heard others verify that. I suspect Frank got a somewhat higher valuation from the auditors (though not near a billion dollars) because the auditors agreed to acknowledge the potential future revenue streams from the library once the channel was in broad distribution and full licensing agreements were in place. It's aggressive, but justifiable. If those revenue streams don't pan out, however, the auditors are eventually going to force them to take an impairment charge down the road. We'll see.

[ January 13, 2006, 21:36: Message edited by: ltesprit ]
 
Posted by ltesprit on :
 
I don't doubt it's big. I've heard others verify that. I suspect Frank got a somewhat higher valuation from the auditors (though not near a billion dollars) because the auditors agreed to acknowledge the potential future revenue streams from the library once the channel was in broad distribution and full licensing agreements were in place. It's aggressive, but justifiable. If those revenue streams don't pan out, however, the auditors are eventually going to force them to take an impairment charge down the road. We'll see.

[ January 13, 2006, 21:36: Message edited by: ltesprit ]
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
boy you get to ihub fast.
 
Posted by ltesprit on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
boy you get to ihub fast.

Imak, ignore any knuckleheads on Ihub. You get them everywhere. There's a lot of folks who, when they lose money, start getting paranoid. It's a common messageboard phenomenon and actually kind of fascinating. People start seeing 'paid pumpers' or 'paid bashers' or 'MM manipulation' when they're losing money and can't rationalize it. I suspect it's a natural defense mechanism. Schizoids often experience paranoia. Doc, ever do a psych rotation?

The ironic thing is, it's self-destructive. Olsen was able to convince some folks that 'MM manipulation' was the reason for QBID's fall; meanwhile he was actually just diluting the stock and hiding the share structure behind the scenes. A lesson folks should take to heart. Occam's Razor: The simplest explanation is often the right one.
 
Posted by buckwheatbob on :
 
The only thing you are desperate for is something to pick apart. Both Money and Doc did their part and have made there statements. If you have a hate on for Frank well that's between you and him. Seeing as he doesn't care who are, I suggest you listen Doc and Money for what they have to offer or move on and quit wining.

With the short statements they both have made, it writes a book for those who know how to read. Are you one of them?

quote:
Originally posted by a4realguy:
We are all DESPERATE for information... and mostly positive information... so we are likely to feel good to hear almost anything... if the president of Time Warner mentions TMM in a conversation.. someone here will post "maybe they are going to buy QBID".... Doc's attempt aside, there is absolutely NO reason to be satisfied with how Fank has handled communication or MOSTLY a lack-there-of with the shareholders.


 
Posted by noah129 on :
 
wow alot of reading today. thanx for the info doc and imake but i have to say even though i am happy that you are both holding and potentially buying more that is great; and now the big but i am a little dissapointed that you didnt share a bit more with us.

i understand you spent YOUR money going out their and if I want the same info then i should set up a meeting myself and go get a plane ticket and the hasles you two both went through.i just thought you would have given a bit more to those of us that are curious cats.

at this point like i have said in the past nothing will shake this qbidiot i am in for the long hual whether it be a week or five years or longer.

everyone else seems thrilled and dancing around that you are keeping your positions.it must have been pretty impressive for you to have aggreed to not sign the aggreement for what you actually came to see.

anyways im exhausted from a long day and like two hours of reading hehe . you folks have been busy qbees.

best of luck sincerely to you all.

jen i will be doing the happy dance when i see some numbers or an increase in pps. i dont like to be negative but it is hard for me to get excited when they didnt get to even look at the audit or any of the finnancials.

bottomliner i know this is untypical of me to be a debbie downer and i fully understand if you want to take me out of the op club.

26 million long and strong.

to the moon or to bankruptcy court ill be here watching this unfold.
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
What part did i do? im just curious?

quote:
Originally posted by buckwheatbob:
The only thing you are desperate for is something to pick apart. Both Money and Doc did their part and have made there statements. If you have a hate on for Frank well that's between you and him. Seeing as he doesn't care who are, I suggest you listen Doc and Money for what they have to offer or move on and quit wining.

With the short statements they both have made, it writes a book for those who know how to read. Are you one of them?

quote:
Originally posted by a4realguy:
We are all DESPERATE for information... and mostly positive information... so we are likely to feel good to hear almost anything... if the president of Time Warner mentions TMM in a conversation.. someone here will post "maybe they are going to buy QBID".... Doc's attempt aside, there is absolutely NO reason to be satisfied with how Fank has handled communication or MOSTLY a lack-there-of with the shareholders.



 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
you know what money. uh uh uh i mean monkey, what you told us was more then you or doc had to. I suspected that we were only getting pieces of the carrot, however i also knew that what you heard and saw was probably NTKB. I appreciate the information that you have shared with us and your "CHANGED" attitude towards the Q, that right there should be enough for anyone, if the people had eyes to see. But most people are blind to differnt little things that might hint them into what might REALLY be happening. Thanks again for the info from you and DOC, and hope you keep posting.

You dont owe us anything, so the free information you gave us was great, and thats what im taking it as. "FREE INFORMATION" so should everyone else.


quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
Well just read the posts from today Doc and myself got alot more info then we have let out and for now im sitting on mine, we do have more meetings coming and at that time i will be signing there paper work to become an insider as long as they meet my needs as well, This is IMHO the time to buy but only if you can handle losing that money would i say BUY, If you can and you can wait it out i feel very good about were you will be in say 1 year,but it could be next week as well, I will also say for myself that any day just might be the day i go inside and stop posting on the Q thread.You know maybe 15% of what took place on are trip to the Q. Just some food for the mind to ponder.


 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
This is for everyone who is crying for more information
 -
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
LAist Loves Lesbians

aprilsshower_jan06.jpg

We found ourselves at the premiere of the lesbiriffic romantic comedy April's Shower last night at the Regent Cinema in Hollywood. Attending a gaysploitation premiere is a little bit like attending a major movie premiere, only smaller and obviously gayer. There were all the usual requisites: a red carpet (small, no bouncer), television reporters (from something called 'Q Television') and plenty of sub D-list celebrities hoping to score an extra drink ticket, but the whole thing was a lot less Brokeback Mountain and a lot more Muff Dive Molehill.

Writer/Director/Producer/Star Trish Doolan thanked everyone whom she had ever met by name despite the audience's dwindling enthusiasm for applauding the Guy-Who-Lent-His-House-Out-for-Shooting, but "Whatever," we told ourselves, "This is her moment." Then she pulled out the New York Times review — and threatened to read it to us. Loud shouting ensued, Doolan stepped down and the movie began.

Fortunately, we're covering the premiere and not the movie (bad, bad, stupendously bad), so we can skip ahead to the after-party. Seen: 40 Year Old Virgin's Jane Lynch, looking gracious, not at all attention hungry, Queer as Folk's Robert Gant and Scott Lowell, though not together, Traffic's Corey Spears and more lesbians (including the super sexy Honey Labrador) than we've seen outside of a marathon screening of a season of The L Word.

Posted by Japhy Grant in Movies

http://www.laist.com/archives/2006/01/13/laist_loves_lesbians.php
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
Wow, go to the drive in for a couple of hours and miss all kind of goodies.


Ittybit, where's my pot pie?!
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
Hey Sam, ever go to the Starlight on Moreland?
Cool place, just not with an antsy 3 year old climbing around in the car! LOL
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
I just submitted an idea for a Tv show for QTN i wonder what they will say [Smile]
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
MM, me and buddy of mine were watching our wives talking to some of our neighbors the other day and decided on a name for a new soap opera. It would be perfect for Q!

"The gays and our wives"
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
HAHAHHA that would be great, id watch it a few times just to see what its about
 
Posted by g-invest on :
 
Boy am I glad I sold QBID at .0008

The O/S is 90 billion minimum.

Remember that Frank can sue me if I'm wrong. But he won't, cause I'm not. All he has to do to prove that I'm wrong is post the numbers. So come on, Frank, please tell us, what is the O/S?

It's great how that works out for him, selling shares and buying his friends parties. Anyone ready for 200 billion A/S within the next two months?
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by g-invest:
Boy am I glad I sold QBID at .0008

The O/S is 90 billion minimum.

Remember that Frank can sue me if I'm wrong. But he won't, cause I'm not. All he has to do to prove that I'm wrong is post the numbers. So come on, Frank, please tell us, what is the O/S?

It's great how that works out for him, selling shares and buying his friends parties. Anyone ready for 200 billion A/S within the next two months?

Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah, Blah


^^^ Now, that was about as useful as your posts... hahaha [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
gee and i thought my posts were a waist of time, you proved me wrong.
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
G-Invest, G-Invest...
He's just an unhappy guy,
G-Invest, G-Invest...
Just go and cry,
Oh can't you see,
won't you let us be?
We don't care what you say,
yet you babble on anyway...
Please go work on something,
and stop making our ears ring...
G-Invest, G-Invest...
He's just an unhappy guy,
G-Invest, G-Invest...
Just go and cry...

Like my song? [Big Grin] Childish, I know, I know...

But, whatever, I like it...
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
davidjanas, where are you? PM me please.
 
Posted by Doctoall on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
rich was NOT at the studios.

Right, we spoke to Richard numerous times via cell but he was not at the studio. He will be there in approx 3 weeks and be temp based there for what maybe up to 6 months. Right through the Gay Games. Must be expecting a lot of action with the stock and the company [Big Grin]
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Hi Imak, thanks. Off to party a bit. I really hope you 2 had a blast.
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
Later Sam. Have fun! [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
im bored at work, i remember someone asked for another dunce hat for someone so here it is.

 -
 
Posted by Marty on :
 
with all the ridiculous posts I just read on this board, just from the last day, I had to add one:

A Man Wins the Lottery

A man rushes into his house and yells to his wife, "Martha, pack up your things. I just won the California lottery!"

Martha replies, "Shall I pack for warm weather or cold?"

The man responds, "I don't care. Just so long as you're out of the house by noon!"
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
lol, that was a note I had waiting. back home. great margaritas [Smile]
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
HHAHAHHAHHAH that was great.
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
Bob, Doc, BWB...sorry about the postings today. I know I don't need to explain. Just thought an apology was in order.
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
aahhaha....too funny Marty. The wife is still cracking up!
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
Hey Sam, ever go to the Starlight on Moreland?
Cool place, just not with an antsy 3 year old climbing around in the car! LOL

Hella Yea!!! Love the Starlight. Little chilly now.
Love bubba pallooza too. [Smile]
 
Posted by Marty on :
 
Ok, one more ridiculous post and I'm done:

Top 5 ways to impress people in chat boards:
Now you know how to impress people in "real" life. But people can't see your sunglasses and hat when you play stocks, so what can you do? one word: chat!

1) Type in all capitals. This conveys an unmistakable air of authority.

2) Take any opportunity you can get to show off your knowledge of stocks. Remember, knowledge is power, and you want to appear powerful.

3) Speed is more important than accuracy. Type as fast as you can and don't worry about stupid chit like spelling or grammar.

4) Everyone is impressed by profanity, but most sites have installed measures to block profanity in chat. You can doubly impress fellow posters with clever workarounds like inserting spaces, underscores and non-english profanity.

5) ASCII art is the coolest thing EVER, especially when in the form of genitalia.


Have fun [Wink]
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
Hey Sam, ever go to the Starlight on Moreland?
Cool place, just not with an antsy 3 year old climbing around in the car! LOL

I know slim chance. hehe [Smile]
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
Hey Sam, ever go to the Starlight on Moreland?
Cool place, just not with an antsy 3 year old climbing around in the car! LOL

Hella Yea!!! Love the Starlight. Little chilly now.
Love bubba pallooza too. [Smile]

It was chilly! Didn't break out the chairs this time, had to stay in the truck!
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
http://www.jambase.com/headsup.asp?storyID=4357
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Drive by truckers [Smile] and flat top rockets;)
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
Ok I have heard of bubba palooza show/festival whatever you wanna call it, and slim chance, just never attended the first or heard the other.
I am way outta the live music and bar scene now a days.
Back when I was doing that stuff I saw Dave Matthews at Masquerade LOL
I think the last smaller concert I saw was Cowboy Mouth at the Roxy about 7-8 years ago.
I am getting old LOL
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Great music,,also a very good support community.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Yes getting way old too. [Smile]
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
That is very cool. I will have to see if I can dig up some sound clips.
Little 5 has changed a bunch! I met some friends of mine for an alumni thing this fall over at Front Page News and wasn't sure I was in the right part of town! Then I saw the Starbucks over near Dragon and KNEW I must have made a wrong turn!! LOL

They didn't kick out all the hippies and punks did they?? It just wouldn't be right
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Star bar was it. 2 to 3 years ago managment changed. Have not been there in 2. Was the best music in ATL.
Hoss
Drinks at the Star Bar.
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
You are on!!
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Sweet you have a pm
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
I think our pms are getting lost somewhere LOL
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
you lost a lot of credibility with me here.


You spent 230 Grand in a pink sheet, and rode is down to just over 14 grand?

you are not to wise are you.

i was taking a bit of what you where saying pretty serious.

I could understand if you told me you had that many shares that you bought originally in the .0001-.0003 area and rode them back down.

but to invest 230 grand with out a stop loss?


If this is true, then you are a morron. or you think we are morons enough to buy what you are saying.

Rod


quote:
Originally posted by ltesprit:
quote:
Originally posted by Doctoall:
Your post is very factual, over the past 3 days both Imakmony and I have had numerous telephone conversations with Richard, at least 4 while we were at the studios. Richard was rather surprised when I spoke to him about the move because he did not think that anyone knew about it yet.

I'm surprised Rich was at the studios, considering he's based on the east coast.

I know a lot of physicians (my father's one and two of my three brothers as well) and have known them to be prettttty bright. I feel a bit stupid having sunk 230 grand into this 'investment' (at .0018 average price), which is almost a sixth of my liquid investable funds. If I knew Olsen was going to play footsie with the audit I couldn't have run away from this stock fast enough. But it's always good to know other serious folks have a lot at stake here and are willing to see this disappointing episode through to some (meaningful) end.

I thank goodness I haven't gotten anyone else into this stock. I'm just hoping Rich is able to impress on them the importance of good corporate governance and making the right moves that will earn some credibility back with the Street. Because that's what is really missing here. The 'missing audit' is just a symptom of that underlying malady.


 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
So are we. but now your back and we have to listen to you [Big Grin]

how many shares did you buy?


[QUOTE]Originally posted by g-invest:
[QB] Boy am I glad I sold QBID at .0008
QUOTE]
 
Posted by airdoo on :
 
hey rod,
ya never know. he might not be a moron he might just have more faith than any other person on the face of this earth in Q
 
Posted by Deg's wife on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by Deg's wife:
... Us 'oldies'

Robin
... and very very "goodies", I might add. [Big Grin]

I am appalled that you could post something even remotely humorous or even borderline friendly while some of us are in the midst of having a good argument! Or at least an argument anyways... [Big Grin]
HT
It's all a trick to seem friendly ... then we attack when their backs are turned. Right, Robin? [Big Grin]

[Big Grin]
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
na he didnt even have faith in Doc and Monkey.

hes a morron.

anyone that can afford that kind of investment understands how hard it is to make that kind of money, and to risk it all on a pink sheet stock, without stoplosses, lossing over 200 grand?

nope i dont think so, and if he did then he is not wise enough for me to listen to him.


quote:
Originally posted by airdoo:
hey rod,
ya never know. he might not be a moron he might just have more faith than any other person on the face of this earth in Q


 
Posted by airdoo on :
 
hey rod,
ya never know. he might not be a moron he might just have more faith than any other person on the face of this earth in Q
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
Wow, go to the drive in for a couple of hours and miss all kind of goodies.


Ittybit, where's my pot pie?!

...more like "Ittybit minded"
[Big Grin]
 
Posted by stashu on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
hes a morron.


Un-freak'n-believable!
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
I got Q! I got Q! yeahhhhhhhhhhhhhh
yeahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
 -

"Dont be that guy"
 
Posted by Wangdo on :
 
MM...another Happy Dance for ya [Big Grin]


 -
 
Posted by buckwheatbob on :
 
My apologies to a4realguy for the comment. I didn't read the whole paragraph and I should have first. I got upset at the first line and was a little perturbed that a handful where not appreciative to what both imakmony and Doc have done. The whiners and insulters want everything handed to them and only function on speculation.

I think if all the recent posts that both Money and Doc have written, are read carefully, it does speak for itself without either one getting them in legal trouble and going against their agreements. They both saw what was presented and no one other than the two of them actually knows what was on the table. Some say no audit and some think they did. They may not be able to even say but certain few still like to get their pokes in.

Both Doc and money where two separate individuals with opposite opinions when they went. Both of them have changed. Doc more positive than when he left for the trip and Money no longer wants to where a goalie mask like Jason from Friday the 13th (LOL!), but now also seems very positive. For those of you who believe you really know how to analyze stocks and charts, you may want to analyze their statements instead, from before they went and after their return.

I am taking their statements not as a grain of salt but as a spoon of sugar. This is my own opinion. Once again, I thank both Doc and Money for accomplishments and statements made here which where worth a lot in my eyes. This has greatly helped in my own decisions which also may include a trip to Burbank in the future.

Buckwheat


quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
What part did i do? im just curious?

quote:
Originally posted by buckwheatbob:
The only thing you are desperate for is something to pick apart. Both Money and Doc did their part and have made there statements. If you have a hate on for Frank well that's between you and him. Seeing as he doesn't care who are, I suggest you listen Doc and Money for what they have to offer or move on and quit wining.

With the short statements they both have made, it writes a book for those who know how to read. Are you one of them?

quote:
Originally posted by a4realguy:
We are all DESPERATE for information... and mostly positive information... so we are likely to feel good to hear almost anything... if the president of Time Warner mentions TMM in a conversation.. someone here will post "maybe they are going to buy QBID".... Doc's attempt aside, there is absolutely NO reason to be satisfied with how Fank has handled communication or MOSTLY a lack-there-of with the shareholders.




 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Wangdo:
MM...another Happy Dance for ya [Big Grin]


 -

[Big Grin]
 
Posted by sidhartha on :
 
Question(s) for Doc and Imak:

There is a clique on this board (Allstocks QBID) that reminds me of a clan straight out of East Tennesee, the way you rush to defend family members from any perceived threat or insult. With some, it borders on neurosis and hinders logical thinking, IMO. To this clique: I’m not threatening or insulting your family, I’d just like to know:

Why the secrecy? Why won’t you tell us more?
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
I like my happy dance better [Big Grin]
 -
 
Posted by Bobbyd on :
 
Hey Imak, If you did not sign a NDA, why share just 15% of the information learned? Why not the other 85%? Gaining accurate information from this company and other investors about this POS stock is so vague (IMO). Another Pink stock I own is Deep Rock Oil and Gas (DPRK). The CEO of that company has answered all questions that I've asked! Sometimes it good news, sometimes bad. At least I'm up 300% on (DPRK); however, down 98% on (QBID)!
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
PT
You have a PM. Or check your email. [Smile]

[ January 14, 2006, 13:27: Message edited by: Bottomliner ]
 
Posted by sidhartha on :
 
To the overseers of this board: Good move.
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
Vote on your favorite happy dance

 - _  - _  -
________Contestant #1 ______________ Contestant #2 ____________ Contestant #3 _________
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
Vote on your favorite happy dance

 - _  - _  -
________Contestant #1 ______________ Contestant #2 ____________ Contestant #3 _________

I'll go with #1...haha
 
Posted by HighSide on :
 
# 3 seems to have twice the moves plus accesories
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
do they owe you a answer? they went of thier own free will, at thier own expences, they do not owe anyone in this world an explanation of what they said, did or heard at this meeting.

they will share what ever they want to share, they will on thier shedual, and they should not be given a hard time about it.

if you are not happy with the info recieved, or the amount of information shared, then i suggest you follow the Washington State guidelines, set up your own meeting, go see what you can and then you too will have all the answers.

Im not defending anyone here, im just stating what are facts.

these guys do not owe anyone on this board anything. They have shared info to us and for that i am very greatful, and you should be as well.

All that should matter to you is that they are not dumping thier shares and staying quiet.


All im saying is show some respect to these individuals. you want more you know what to do.

rod


quote:
Originally posted by Bobbyd:
Hey Imak, If you did not sign a NDA, why share just 15% of the information learned? Why not the other 85%? Gaining accurate information from this company and other investors about this POS stock is so vague (IMO). Another Pink stock I own is Deep Rock Oil and Gas (DPRK). The CEO of that company has answered all questions that I've asked! Sometimes it good news, sometimes bad. At least I'm up 300% on (DPRK); however, down 98% on (QBID)!


 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
Imak, PM...
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
HAHHAHAHAHHAH PT, i never thought of that, that is hilarious, espcailly when you imagine them with Q in the background hahahhahaha. I may have to try something now [Big Grin]
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
I definitely vote for #2
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
I like the one in the middle of Doc and Monkey leaving the Q office.

Rod


quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
Vote on your favorite happy dance

 - _  - _  -
________Contestant #1 ______________ Contestant #2 ____________ Contestant #3 _________


Rod
Good catch ... I didn't realize that was a real photo of Doc and imak. [Big Grin] Therefore, I vote for it too.
 
Posted by Golf Money on :
 
PT

Although the information that was given is appreciated, the point is, since they are not under an NDA, if they won't tell us what they saw,
why tell anything at all?

Seems weird.

And you sound pretty defensive to me.
 
Posted by sidhartha on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
do they owe you a answer? they went of thier own free will, at thier own expences, they do not owe anyone in this world an explanation of what they said, did or heard at this meeting.

they will share what ever they want to share, they will on thier shedual, and they should not be given a hard time about it.

if you are not happy with the info recieved, or the amount of information shared, then i suggest you follow the Washington State guidelines, set up your own meeting, go see what you can and then you too will have all the answers.

Im not defending anyone here, im just stating what are facts.

these guys do not owe anyone on this board anything. They have shared info to us and for that i am very greatful, and you should be as well.

All that should matter to you is that they are not dumping thier shares and staying quiet.


All im saying is show some respect to these individuals. you want more you know what to do.

rod


quote:
Originally posted by Bobbyd:
Hey Imak, If you did not sign a NDA, why share just 15% of the information learned? Why not the other 85%? Gaining accurate information from this company and other investors about this POS stock is so vague (IMO). Another Pink stock I own is Deep Rock Oil and Gas (DPRK). The CEO of that company has answered all questions that I've asked! Sometimes it good news, sometimes bad. At least I'm up 300% on (DPRK); however, down 98% on (QBID)!


Granted. They owe us nothing. But they know (and Frank and Co. knows) that a multitude of stockholders from the boards (Allstocks, IHUB, RB, etc.) were anxiously awaiting their findings. What's the big deal? Why won't they go into detail about it?

Their secrecy only leaves it wide open for a myriad of imaginations (just like Frank Olsen's style), good or bad. We were all hoping that Doc and Imak would provide us with some sound, detailed information which has not been available from Frank. So far, they've not done this.

But, as you stated, they owe us nothing.
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
im not defensive. im stating points. you are right why say anything at all . maybe they feel the same.

maybe we will not hear anymore from them about it.

if this is so that is thier perogative.

fact of the matter is they are only going to share what they want and all the bitchin in the world will not change that, so why bother bitching about it.

im not defensive of anything. im stateing facts.

facts that seem to be eludding several on this board.

if you can prove those facts wrong please do.

its not a fact that you know they can share anything they want. you dont know what they where told they can or can not share. they do and they will share what they feel like shareing.

You are not entitled to anything, you did not fund them in any manner what so ever, and thier information did not come for free. maybe they should be charging for the information and them you can complain when you pay their price.


quote:
Originally posted by Golf Money:
PT

Although the information that was given is appreciated, the point is, since they are not under an NDA, if they won't tell us what they saw,
why tell anything at all?

Seems weird.

And you sound pretty defensive to me.


 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
inbreeds hmmmm i would think that an inbread person would not see the humour in the post above and be upset about the humour because of his inabilities to understand the humour, and then start throwing out insults that dont make sence.

and oh ya
see ya bye bye now, nice to see ya

have a safe trip, take care now tuda lue

astalavista

cio
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
what did i DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
i think you ticked off an inbread
 
Posted by Golf Money on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
im not defensive. im stating points. you are right why say anything at all . maybe they feel the same.

maybe we will not hear anymore from them about it.

if this is so that is thier perogative.

fact of the matter is they are only going to share what they want and all the bitchin in the world will not change that, so why bother bitching about it.

im not defensive of anything. im stateing facts.

facts that seem to be eludding several on this board.

if you can prove those facts wrong please do.

its not a fact that you know they can share anything they want. you dont know what they where told they can or can not share. they do and they will share what they feel like shareing.

You are not entitled to anything, you did not fund them in any manner what so ever, and thier information did not come for free. maybe they should be charging for the information and them you can complain when you pay their price.


quote:
Originally posted by Golf Money:
PT

Although the information that was given is appreciated, the point is, since they are not under an NDA, if they won't tell us what they saw,
why tell anything at all?

Seems weird.

And you sound pretty defensive to me.



 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
you really need to be more sensitive to this minority group, they have a hard time understanding humour. infact im typing this really slow so they can keep up.

Rod
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
HAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAAH i wonder how many people will actually get that.

quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
you really need to be more sensitive to this minority group, they have a hard time understanding humour. infact im typing this really slow so they can keep up.

Rod


 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
Golf the point of your lack of a last point is?
 
Posted by Golf Money on :
 
Obviously it is their right to say what or how much they want and I am not bitching or feel that I am entitled to anything, just curiousity, stating my thoughts as you do dozens of times a day.

And Doctoall said that he did not sign an NDA. A fact as I know it.

Also, you shouldn't confuse facts with your opinion!
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
Okay i got a good one for you all, that is if you can get it.

Watch this
 -

while listening to this click me

listen to the beat and watch them dance [Smile]
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
everyone should i typed it really slowly.

lol [Big Grin] [Big Grin] [Wink]

quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
HAHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAAH i wonder how many people will actually get that.

quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
you really need to be more sensitive to this minority group, they have a hard time understanding humour. infact im typing this really slow so they can keep up.

Rod



 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
EEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHEEEEEEEAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHAAAAAAAAAA. YUR GILLIN ME!
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
Ok kids cookies and milk then its nap time.
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
dig edit that you killed the page
 
Posted by Jennifercd10 on :
 
Good Afternoon to all the inhabitants of “Q-Land”. I have taken a few days to read and think about Imaknony’s (IMM) and Doc’s “adventure” to Burbank. I first want to give my profound thanks to these men. They were the ones who stepped up and did something. We all just talked and as someone said, talk is cheap. Both of these men have shown us that they are strong in their beliefs and determined in their intent. None of us were happy with the information flow from Frank and these men did something about it. They took their time, money and effort for us all. Sure doing it for themselves is one thing, but doing it for the good of others also is something else. I’m very disappointed in those who have taken pot shots at those who had the courage to act verses talk. I have a lot to say and this will be long and in several parts.

It seems that some on this board do not understand what they read. Doc was the first to post and it was very clear, IMO, that he had to be careful what he said. Their release of information has been slow which is indicative of caution. Put yourself in their shoes. They are in the middle between the company and its investors. I’m, for one, glad they are cautious. I want the right information, and if they can’t give certain information then they have demonstrated that they can communicate it without directly saying it, thus they stay out of trouble. We need to give then their respect; after all they are the ones walking the tightrope.

In Doc’s first post about their “adventure”, he compared the workforce to the last time he was there on Oct. 11th 2005. That was 3 months ago. “Compared to last fall, there are twice as many staff there, all very busy and proud to be a part of "Q". The place is a buzz, they have added 3-4 new sets for upcoming shows (no names mentioned) yet for those shows.” The workforce doubled!!! 3-4 new sets! A Bee Hive of activity! They are not boarding up the windows and unscrewing the light bulbs! What we see are sure signs of an expanding and succeeding company.

“The place appears to be running more smoothly. On my last tour I did not get to visit the suites upstairs, but today I did. Geez state of the art, the equip must be worth a bundle.” They have gotten their act together and becoming more efficient. I know someone who has also seen the upstairs and it is the latest in digital technology. Yes, worth a bundle or two.

“It is my understanding that Richard Brown will be located in Burbank in approx 3 weeks and will operate out of Burbank.” Praise the Lord and pass the information. This is another very positive move by Frank. Watch out Richard your becoming reachable! I see this as a step toward transparency.

“There was a meeting today at "Q" with the Reps from the Gay Games and the production crew.” Q is making sure they do it right! This has huge ramifications for Q’s future and us.

“I promise that I will get as much information out as I can, just very tired tonight, although I arrived in Burbank yesterday at 430PM I did not get to bed until after 230AM this morning and up again at 600AM this morning. ” It would have been a long day for any of us. This also gives Doc and Monkey (a term of endearment!) time to formulate their thoughts and sort out what they can and can’t say along with how and when… no easy task!

Nothing negative, thank God. No numbers, no audit. Just the peripheral, but these all pointed to a successful company that is expanding. From the employee’s standpoint, they can see the brass ring and they are going for it. The sweet smell of success is in the air.

Later on the 12th by Doc. “First of all, "Q" has to get a carrier to take their programming, then the carrier has an intro period in the new area. "Q" has to pay for promos and if the carrier charges customers for programming it is not likely that "Q" sees any of the money that the carriers call set up fees.

So while "Q" has to provide the programming for trial, the carrier gets new subs and build a base for the station. Depending on the carrier agreement, the sub money starts to flow to "Q" after a 90 day trial. So folks guess what it takes money to create new programming and to keep it going.” I do know that every region we open up costs Q between 100k and 200k in start-up costs.

IMM… “Im holding and adding more at these prices,” and “At this time i want my buy order to go through, we saw so much and got sooo many things to think about i need time to take it all in before i say more”.
“ADDING MORE” and “I WANT MY BUY ORDER TO GO THROUGH”. Is this the time I start talking about Rocket Science??? It sure seems like IMM wants more shares now before something will cause the pps to GO UP! At this time, these two have more information then ANY of us and what are their actions with this stock? I’ve never met a man that doesn’t like money and their actions speak very loudly. “we saw so much and got sooo many things to think about i need time to take it all in before i say more”. Seems like IMM is being cautious and rightly so.

Jennifer’s Part One Summation

They only talked about the peripheral. They are being very cautious. IMM and Doc are at least holding their positions and, as of the last post above, IMM is adding immediately. If I’m lost in the forest and someone has better information on how to get out, I’ll follow his lead.

Warning!!! Part two out tomorrow. In the meantime, I’m going out and do the Happy Dance!
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jennifercd10:
... Warning!!! Part two out tomorrow. In the meantime, I’m going out and do the Happy Dance!

Jenn
I'm all giddy with anticipation ... won't sleep a wink tonight. See you here tomorrow ... [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
Off topic, GO REDSKINS!!!!!
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
Jenn that was well thought out as usual.

thanks for expressing this for theboard to rethink thier possitions on what Doc and Imak actually told us.


Rod
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
get back on topic you jackass.

no more off topic. your job is to post the humorous pictures and keep track of the voting for best happy dance.

[Big Grin]


quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
Off topic, GO REDSKINS!!!!!


 
Posted by quikI8holes on :
 
I just received an e-mail touting a stock that sells an energy drink called dickens cider, I thought that was a joke song they played on the radio but I guess it is true. I have to check it out. I cant imagine owning a Q stock and a dickens cider stock, sounds too funny. DCBI is the symble if anyone has heard of it
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
The happy Dance vote so far
#1 = 1
#2 = 4 (including mine)
#3 = 1

This is the dance you will have to do to get your cheesecake in Vegas. Votes will be tallies peridoically as they come in [Big Grin]

In light of new information, I'd like to change my vote from #1 to #2...
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
Yessssss masssstor

 -


quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
get back on topic you jackass.

no more off topic. your job is to post the hunourous pictures and keep track of the voting for best happy dance.

[Big Grin]


quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
Off topic, GO REDSKINS!!!!!



 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by sidhartha:
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
The happy Dance vote so far
#1 = 1
#2 = 4 (including mine)
#3 = 1

This is the dance you will have to do to get your cheesecake in Vegas. Votes will be tallies peridoically as they come in [Big Grin]

Bunch of inbreeds, how stupid can you get.

Goodbye.

Hahaha, I hope you are joking... and let me point out, YOU are the one from Appalachia...haha
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
sorry all votes that have been tallied are final.

quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
The happy Dance vote so far
#1 = 1
#2 = 4 (including mine)
#3 = 1

This is the dance you will have to do to get your cheesecake in Vegas. Votes will be tallies peridoically as they come in [Big Grin]

In light of new information, I'd like to change my vote from #1 to #2...

 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
Rod, go to your room till your called for dinner.

quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
dig edit that you killed the page


 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
ok is it dinner time yet? [Big Grin]


quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
Rod, go to your room till your called for dinner.

quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
dig edit that you killed the page



 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
Did anyone get a DVD yet? [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
yeah i just bought the grim adventures of billy and mandy.

quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
Did anyone get a DVD yet? [Big Grin]


 
Posted by Jennifercd10 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by quikI8holes:
I just received an e-mail touting a stock that sells an energy drink called dickens cider, I thought that was a joke song they played on the radio but I guess it is true. I have to check it out. I cant imagine owning a Q stock and a dickens cider stock, sounds too funny. DCBI is the symble if anyone has heard of it

We should send this one to Steve Kmetko
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
No, wasn't they supposed to go out this past week, or is it the next week (365 days)?
Or has that just become a little inside joke around Q? That nobody thinks we can see through. [Eek!]
I don't know that it will mean much.

I still think hot dogs and balloons should be included. We don't get to go to any of the expensive parties that we pay for.

quote:
Originally posted by mjm2005:
Did anyone get a DVD yet? [Big Grin]


 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
hey dont be that way dig, i think you can go to any of those parties if you want to go to where they are having them.

several from IHUB in the past have been to launch parties.

but i think you are right about the DVD that they where to go out near the end of last week, but i also remember hearing that they just completed the content on the DVD so i believe it would be out to get stamped, and then distributed.

now days i dont know how long that takes but imagine they would need to punch our severl thousand at least. I dont know how long that takes these days but i would think it would be several days to get them out of a factory and ready to ship.

so we may be a week or 2 yet before we hear of the first DVD being delivered.

Rod
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
Yes Master.

 -
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
email Rod
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
Yes Master.

It would be good if the DVD is as updated as possible. I think the first time it was mentioned was back in the old days when Q was just starting out.

 -


 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
mine was more funny
 
Posted by Jennifercd10 on :
 
But, who has the signed copy?
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
Well, I'll keep ya'll informed...if I get mine...

Although I expect the folks on the West Coast will probably receive theirs first...
 
Posted by Doctoall on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jennifercd10:
But, who has the signed copy?

Good point [Big Grin]
 
Posted by imakmony2005 on :
 
Doc, man ihub is talking some big chit about you total BS.
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
Hey you guys just wanted to apologize for my recent offensive postings. My patience just finally grew to thin I guess. I’ve always thought idiocy and extreme speculation had no place on this thread. It’s just aggravating when outsiders come in and negatively taint our thread and disrespect our senior members.

And I especially wish to extend an even greater apology to Bob, BWB and Doc. I know your job is to uphold the integrity of this thread and keep the respect amongst us all. So I will continue, as I have before, and abide to the rules for which boundary’s I have regrettably crossed.

Again, to all….my apologies.
 
Posted by DIGDOUGH on :
 
It ain't me, I don't even post there.

quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
Doc, man ihub is talking some big chit about you total BS.


 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
let them talk we know what you guys did. and we appreciate your work.

Rod

quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
Doc, man ihub is talking some big chit about you total BS.


 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
let them talk we know what you guys did. and we appreciate your work.

Rod

quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
Doc, man ihub is talking some big chit about you total BS.


Yeah and it's that same mentality thats bled over unto our thread these last couple of days.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Doc and Imak. I hope you had a good time. I certainaly understand being quite about the visit. Like I said before, won't touch that with a 10 foot pole. Respect both of you. Take care and have some fun.
As always make your own decisions.
Cheers.
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
Let them talk about our memebers at IHUB, if they dont have the balls to express their opinions about specific members of Allstocks then as far as im concerned, they are worthless post. Until they have the courage to post their complaints where the members reside that they are complaiing/posting about then as far as im concerned they devalue the integrity of that forum and the validity of their message.

As long as we keep the integrity of our board on high standards, then the value of our opinion will be worth more then the underhanded, backstabbing posts that they submit over there.

JMO
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
on a lighter note YEAH SEATTLE
 
Posted by LEO on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
on a lighter note YEAH SEATTLE

*******YEAH SEATTLE********
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
Just curious here, but to those certain persistent individuals who seem unnerved as to why some or all of the information gathered by Doc and Imak, is not being disclosed, I ask this question…Even if they had disclosed every thing they learned, would the information, good or bad, constitute an execution to buy or sell being "unofficial"?
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
QBIDn, imo it is irrelevant. Think QBID will be at these levels until TMM audit is released.JMO
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Seahawks
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by DIGDOUGH:
It ain't me, I don't even post there.

quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
Doc, man ihub is talking some big chit about you total BS.


It's mainly that Sputnik cat...
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
JW, is the market open on Monday?
 
Posted by ptrs30 on :
 
NYSE is closed
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by ptrs30:
NYSE is closed

That's fine... but Nasdaq and Amex are open?
 
Posted by QBID'n on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
QBIDn, imo it is irrelevant. Think QBID will be at these levels until TMM audit is released.JMO

Exactly. And most of us know that. I was just hoping my last post was likened to hanging garlic outside our front door. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Doctoall on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by imakmony2005:
Doc, man ihub is talking some big chit about you total BS.

I could care less what they think they know or what they have to say. The Ihub board does have some good people over there, the rest just come and go.
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
whats monday?


why is the new york exchange close? is it a holiday in the US?

Rod
 
Posted by ptrs30 on :
 
Nasdaq is closed too. Marthin Luther King Birthday
 
Posted by ptrs30 on :
 
AMEX is closed also
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
yup, thank ya...preciate it
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
MLK day.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Did itesprit get banned from here?
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
i doubt it i dont think he did anything other then be an ass, and that is not a crime.

he jst stopped posting once we started riding him about his statement that he invest 230 grand at .0018 and how smart he was.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Hope so.
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by sidhartha:
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
The happy Dance vote so far
#1 = 1
#2 = 4 (including mine)
#3 = 1

This is the dance you will have to do to get your cheesecake in Vegas. Votes will be tallies peridoically as they come in [Big Grin]

Bunch of inbreeds, how stupid can you get.

Goodbye.

LOL Don't let the door hit ya in the a** on the way out!
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Thanks Rod.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Cold night Hoss brrrrrr.
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
cold what do you call cold?
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
Cold night Hoss brrrrrr.

No kidding. Just picked up my mocha and got home and boarded up LOL
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
cold what do you call cold?

Anything under 50 degrees F!! LOL But is down around freezing tonight with a LOT of wind.
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
lol i can understand that being cold to you.

this week it warmed up to 35 degrees here and i was driving around with my truck window open, it felt warm.


we are heading for -11 as a high tomorrow
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
lol i can understand that being cold to you.

this week it warmed up to 35 degrees here and i was driving around with my truck window open, it felt warm.


we are heading for -11 as a high tomorrow

ACK! If it gets in the 20's we freak out! And god help us if there is an inch of snow. The whole city shuts down until it thaws!!

I like snow..... on vacation!
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
SOunds like fun...
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
you guys are spoiled rotten. we had 3 inches this afternoon and we call that at light dusting lol

we are driving on the lakes with our vehicles now. over a foot of ice out there.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
LOL, we also complain when it hits 95f.
-11f no thanks. BRRRRRRRRRR
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
lol


we just drink to keep the antifreeze in the blood lol

Rod
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
LMAO [Big Grin] [Eek!]
 
Posted by Doctoall on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
Did itesprit get banned from here?

I don't think so
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
The more i work at my job the more i realize how freaking stuipd people are and how big whiners people are. I had a user complain that he couldent print (my favorite call btw) i wokred on it for over 3 hours because it was a problem on the front end process side and i couldent fix it (no access). Sitting around listen to the users whine, listening to the guys on the phone giving me BS reasons why its not working, while im telling them whats wrong.

after 3 hours, to get one printer working (because the user is too lazy to print to anther printer 15 feet away, LITERALLY) it was *gasp* something on the front end process and it meraculously started working. Times like this makes me want to go postal and everyone here, becaues everyone here is lazy and stupid...

*rant off*
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
dam my printer isnt working again calling MM

camming MM.


oh its the power button never mind.


Rod
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Might be an antifreeze problem LOLOL. [Smile]
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
lol could be a lack there of problem lol
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Watching Shaun of the dead. Too funny. Any interested in openning up midnight movie theaters?
B and cults like Rocky horror. Get the people out again.
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
LMAO MM, that is the reason I am no longer in software development!! I was a programmer for 8 years, the only problem was that I became tech support for every friend and family member I ever had!!
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
Dam Sam, I have thought for years about doing something like that! [Smile]
Atlanta is too big a city not to have even a revival theater or something similar!
I think downtown East Point is the perfect place, I just don't know enough about the business to even start.
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
OH OH OH let me add this on top of everything else

Bellsouth is upgrading there DS3 Ring around the memphis area, speratic internet throughout the night. Poweroutage at our main facility that houses most of our servers. And a planned outage on most of the mainframe apps that we have. I hate today....
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
PT, I might have to run to the store and buy some of that anti-freeze right now. The cubbard is bare here. Unless you count sippy cups and Teddy Grahams! [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
Im watching Billy Madison. was cool to see Cris Farley. i miss his comedy.

what a waste.

Rod

quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
Watching Shaun of the dead. Too funny. Any interested in openning up midnight movie theaters?
B and cults like Rocky horror. Get the people out again.


 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Hoss there are a couple. One is by the majestic on ponce but the subs don't have them (dunwoody). The now young people probably haven't experienced it.
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
I have been to that one. I saw "Pi" there last I think. Do they show old movies too? Or just independents and stuff?
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Penny any midnight theaters in Prescott? Love this kind of stuff.
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
PT, Chris Farley in Tommy Boy was unfortunately way too close to describing me in college! LOL
He was damn funny.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
It used to run Rocky for years. Would love to get some John Waters stuff.
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
Id like to point out that i hate you all right now... so TAAAAA!!!!
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Chris was great.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Why the hate MM?
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
LOL Aw MM, don't hate us because we're beautiful!
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Even Devine was beautifull. [Smile]
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
im allowed to hate anyone for any reason at this perticular moment in time [Mad]
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
LOL there isnt a movie theater for 60 miles around Prescott lol it is a tiny town maybe 5000 people.

midnight theater would be the peeping tom studios lol

of course i dont do that lol

i built my own theater in the living room with the big screen tv, statellite tv.

lol
rod

quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
Penny any midnight theaters in Prescott? Love this kind of stuff.


 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Sounds like too much stress mm. Want to buy a theater? We could go public LOL.
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
LOL Rod we could shake the town up. Have you ever seen Waterford Girl?
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
LOL I had a securities lawyer send me some info on getting listed on the pink sheets. I wanted to see what was involved. Not enough specifics though, just marketing fluff.
I even have a company to do it with! I will let yall know when the new website is set up! [Big Grin]
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Cool, Drinks in Little 5 pal. We need to do that.
 
Posted by HossTrader on :
 
Definitely. Did you get my email address?
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
Monopoly Money.

i feel for you as this is a terrible night for you.

i have been involved in IT and the late nights involved in getting a problem resolved in time for business hours the next day is stressful.

i like what im doing now. I keep people warm.

when i leave a customers house they always have a big smile on thier face. and that is much more gratifying to me then the it life where you where only thouhgt about when the computers are down and not remembered once its working.

So i can relate MM

i feel bad that you are going through all that.

you jackass. [Razz]
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
Yes.
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
I dont remember that one no

quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
LOL Rod we could shake the town up. Have you ever seen Waterford Girl?


 
Posted by firefly on :
 
pm hoss
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
I am up for a little while.
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
Im glad i can always count on my good ol buddy PT to Brighten up my spirits

espcailly when i look at this

 -

quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
Monopoly Money.

i feel for you as this is a terrible night for you.

i have been involved in IT and the late nights involved in getting a problem resolved in time for business hours the next day is stressful.

i like what im doing now. I keep people warm.

when i leave a customers house they always have a big smile on thier face. and that is much more gratifying to me then the it life where you where only thouhgt about when the computers are down and not remembered once its working.

So i can relate MM

i feel bad that you are going through all that.

you jackass. [Razz]


 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
Ill go in 51-49 with ya [Smile] as long as we get the investors to pay for it [Big Grin]

quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
Sounds like too much stress mm. Want to buy a theater? We could go public LOL.


 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
I have been to that one. I saw "Pi" there last I think. Do they show old movies too? Or just independents and stuff?

Good good movie...WEIRD, but good
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
LOL I had a securities lawyer send me some info on getting listed on the pink sheets. I wanted to see what was involved. Not enough specifics though, just marketing fluff.
I even have a company to do it with! I will let yall know when the new website is set up! [Big Grin]

Hahaha, Hoss...I'll invest...
 
Posted by Monopoly Money on :
 
okay my 3rd shift came in, i made it home. So screw you guys im going asleep

 -
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
On Topic with Chrisanne Eastwood Blog... seems new...

http://www.qtelevision.com/site/ProgramsIndex/OnTopic/OnTopicBlog/tabid/150/BlogID/2/ParentBlogID/1/Default.aspx
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
mjm, want to get a business going? Have fun and make money.
 
Posted by Jennifercd10 on :
 
Just got back from doing the Happy Dance. Anyone else out doing the Happy Dance?
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
http://www.qtelevision.com/site/Default.aspx?tabid=101

On Q Live seems updated too...just a new pic I think... maybe new description as well... nothing too fancy
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
First theater in Prescott. BRRRRRR
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
QueerEdge has a fan site-->

http://www.queeredge.tv/

I think QTN made it... pics of Jack and Sandra...
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
LOL jen did that last night. Need cheezecake tonight.
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
mjm, want to get a business going? Have fun and make money.

Yeah, I'm up for it...
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
http://qtelevision.com/site/tabid/151/BlogID/4/Default.aspx

I guess Jack has a blog too... only one entry though... maybe he's mad he has to share the spotlight... haha
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
Reichen's site has been updated... I don't know how recently, but it's newer than the last time I checked it out... that's probably a few weeks ago...

http://www.qtelevision.com/site/Default.aspx?tabid=143
 
Posted by mjm2005 on :
 
Hmmmm... Xcess/Access...

Is this new? Either I never noticed it or they updated the page for it... it's a show with Honey and Robbie...

http://www.qtelevision.com/site/Default.aspx?tabid=155
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
People are so at home for movie entertaiment. Think the kids would love a drive inn experience. B movies . The problem is land and start up capital.
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
As many know, i have been very negative towards QTN (Frank olsen) of late and will continue to post truthful negative actions by the company.

But, with that being said, i am impressed by recent actions being taken by the company - possible move by richard (IR) to burbank to become fulltime, search for CFO, possible stepdown of Frank from CEO position, DVD finally being shipped, PR stating 100% ownership.)

I do wonder if the company is now trying to turn over a new leaf.

In fact, to be truthful, a couple days earlier i was wondering if QTN was going bankrupt but i may have been completely mistaken.

There have been some great posts from IHUB today that i will be posting here.
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
from skunks...

Posted by: skunksyard
In reply to: gees who wrote msg# 209157 Date:1/14/2006 2:19:50 PM
Post #of 209274

these are not movies

CATHEDRAL OF HOPE
THE STYLIST
BRUNCH
IN FOQUS
BEST OF COMEDY
FLESH AND THREADS
XCESS/ACCESS
Q THE MUSIC
Q ON THE MOVE
BOX OFFICE AMERICA
SUNDANCE 2005
Q SOUNDS
BROADWAY BEAT

QTN's a great network. The programs are well thought out and both informative and a lot of fun to watch. Honey Labrador is another equivalent 'gay games' grab for Frank. She knows her stuff when it comes to fashion and the entertainment and she is an excellent interviewer. That's not only BRUNCH but also Xcess/Acces. Steve Kmetko QTN World News is an excellent gay slant newscaster. He knows his stuff and is a great interviewer. He's drawn a lot of well known GLBT folks across the country to his shows for interviews. You can see the clips of Steve's news shows on Planet Out. Chrisanne does an outstanding job with On topic. Chrisanne is a brilliant woman who knows her stuff and researches her topics very well before the show. She's attracts some really good and very interesting interviews. I'm expecting Chrisanne's show to go to an hour. Reichen's show as it turns out is a very good show. He has 2 co-hosts who sit on either side of him and they have varying opinions on the topic of the night from agreeing to disagreeing. The show is based on callers questions and comments and I've found it interesting to listen to all week. Q live is a lot of fun, a lot of fun. Robbie, being Honey's travelling companion in many media events, has also drawn a lot of good interviews for this show and he equally knows his stuff. There's something very interesting about Robbie's presentation. Saskia is well read in sports and I expect to see her role with the Gay Games increase even more than the increase we're seeing right now. Queer Edge, is "queer edge".....the folks on this show have really met the criteria, fascinating, way out there in many cases, very interesting subjects and Jack E Jett is one of the funniest people I've ever seen on tv.....Nick Oram is finally getting his material out there, last night the LA special was really informative and easily could be put out on main stream tv as an interesting travel magazine.....when Wenda Watch's show hits she will also be well received I bet. She is a riot...Steve Oldfield is the entertainment review person, they also have a porn review person on frequently and on the QTN World News a legal analyst frequently shows up as a guest (same one in many cases)...

QTN to me presents an interesting slant to information being put out in the media. Much of it's focus is obviously gay related but like any other group in history following this group, the styles, history, issues, events, politics, economics is nothing less than fascinating to me. This year is going to be the breakthrough year for the GLBT community business wise. With the launch of gay media, tied in with Planet Out's reach to national and international levels (their international reach is 150 countries) the GLBT styles, history, issues, events, politics, economics will now be found in consolidated vehicles and therefore the awareness created from these consolidated vehicles will serve to increase the strength of the march forward to equality of the GLBT community. I am most interested in the business aspect of this effort (the equality effort I think I heard will take 10 years)....but the business effort should show major advances in 2006 with QTN and it's competitors leading the way. Along with the newly introduced TWIST Gay Radio recently announced....QTN is positioned so well in this Gay Corporate effort as the vehicle that is going to help get the info out there.....and of course sticking to a 24/7 business plan they have plenty of slots to put these information programs....
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
from itesprit...

Posted by: ltesprit
In reply to: None Date:1/14/2006 3:06:05 PM
Post #of 209274

Just spoke with Richard for half and hour. He's only considering moving to Burbank; his 'definite' move was just another Olsenism. Before he decides, he laid out some ground rules or conditions with TMM senior management. He couldn't go into those conditions with me for obvious reasons, but I am very comfortable that Rich understands the corporate governance and credibility issues that plague TMM and the stock. He acknowledged that those where the basis of his conditions. It's not money or personal matters.

Our conversations are always good; Richard is forthright in his opinion of the company and its actions and holds back only in disclosure matters. The company IS looking for a new, experienced CFO, and Richard is involved in the process, though maybe not as much as he'd like. This is why he's considering the move to Burbank; he feels his physical presence there could make a difference in getting things done right. He's told me that many of senior management's mistakes are born of inexperience and, by extension, fear. They've made mistakes, they're making mistakes, and they don't want to land in legal hot water. I told him I suspect that is why the audit results are being suppressed. Richard said he literally could not speak to that because he hasn't seen the audit, but he understood what I meant because I explained it to him: Frank has made representations to shareholders about asset values, profitability, and ownership structure that are certainly were clearly untrue. As you can see, I believe the audit exists. I have no doubt. I also have no doubt TMM owns 100% of QTN.

Rich is also involved in writing the PRs, but Legal edits them, as does senior management. So what ends up getting released is not always what he'd written, and that is a source of disappointment and frustration for him. Sometimes there are legal considerations, but othertimes Frank or Rene get overly cautious about what they want to disclose. Why, I'm not sure. Richard chalks it up to fear of disclosing things they shouldn't, but anyone who's heard Frank's long-winded blathering knows the guy sure doesn't seem cautious. Quite the opposite. Regardless, Richard is looking to become the voice of investor relations and getting Frank out of that role. Quality over quantity, and I'm all for that. I think we all are.

This post is getting long, so I'll start another one....
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
more from itsprit...

Posted by: ltesprit
In reply to: ltesprit who wrote msg# 209171 Date:1/14/2006 3:25:24 PM
Post #of 209274

Richard Brown (part 2)

In case anyone didn't realize, the company is NOT going to be profitable in January 2006. This was another Olsenism. Anyone familiar with startups knew this was b.s., and Richard is in touch with a lot of fund managers who tell him that such b.s. only hurts the company. Richard knows this already, and, again, this is why he wants to play a bigger role as spokesman.

He told me there are changes afoot; the new CFO and his possible move being only two of them. If he DOES move, I'll be satisfied that he got Frank to agree to some pretty substantial and meaningful changes. Whether Frank follows through.... I warned Richard that I feared his trying to professionalize that organization might be an exercise in frustration. He's obviously more confident than I.

Richard talks often with Carol Hinnant, who's also pretty experienced and savvy and knows the shortcomings that need addressing. I told him I was afraid Carol might get the sh-ts of things eventually and leave, but he doesn't think so. Carol is having great success in gaining carriage and so far things are rolling along for her. I've spoken to Carol, and she's a shareholder too (like Rich). They paid for their shares. So we've got some good folks inside that are onboard our boat as well.

I also told him I thought they should sell LBS and use the proceeds to help fund their core business, QTN. I said a good CFO would clearly show why LBS, profitable or not, is a waste of capital and management when you're trying to get your core business up and running. Richard agreed but explained that LBS is profitable and basically pays the salaries and Frank and Rene are loathe to sell it. He agreed that it should go though, and said that down the road maybe Frank will come to that realization, too.

I'm kind of tapped out now. If I think of anything else I'll post it.
 
Posted by MillerTIME on :
 
great post from zandent...

Posted by: zandant
In reply to: skunksyard who wrote msg# 209246 Date:1/14/2006 11:55:40 PM
Post #of 209274


In oder for the company to function at a competent level operationally, several things need to be done first:

(1) Step down because he no longer has any credibility (wishful thinking only);
(2) Create a solid Board of Directors, who have some control over the workings of the company. As it now stands, there are no checks and balances and with a person like Frank in control, that it dangerous and the results are already seen in the pps;
(3)Admit to the investors that several mistakes have been made as the company developed. Some representations never played out and some moves were necessary for the survival of the company. However, with the company now growing, it is time to move on from a "mom and pop" operation, and this requires talented and respected people to run the business end of the company. He should then announce he will be involved in the creative development of programs but would leave the day-to-day operations in the hands of a solid management team;
(4)Develop a business plan and follow it;
(5)Establish an excellent reputation, particularly with business partners because in this business, you are often only as good as your name;
(6)Use his extremely valuable film library as equity and take out a 14 million dollar loan agains that $400 million dollar film library, buy back and retire 70 billion shares in the float. If the retirement of all of those shares is too drastic, he can use a retire/restrict formula.
 
Posted by Sam1959 on :
 
MT:
Thanks for bringing those posts over from IHUB. Good information! [Smile]
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
LMAO MM, that is the reason I am no longer in software development!! I was a programmer for 8 years, the only problem was that I became tech support for every friend and family member I ever had!!

HT and MM
As a hobby, I "tune-up" computers for friends and relatives. For free, of course. It's amazing to me how little many computer users understand about their computers. I'm not poking fun at them, just pointing out how easily these people can be "fooled" into paying for unnecessary and overpriced repairs by professional repair shops.

I've fixed "broken" monitors by plugging them into an electrical outlet, sound systems by clicking off the mute button, and computer "freeze-ups" by removing a disk from the floppy drive during bootup. Once, I "fixed" a computer that a professional repair shop declared "dead" simply by replacing the RAM module ... a potential problem that apparently never occurred to the pros.

But mostly I fix "broken" computers by cleaning all the internet crap off the hard drive. People run McAfee or Norton virus scanners that are 3 years out of date and wonder why they have viruses ... and they download every "free" offer from the internet and wonder why spyware, adware and pop-ups have maxed out their hard drive. Some of the "anti-spyware" programs people install are actually worse spyware than what they are trying to prevent ... LOL.

Anyway ... I don't envy anyone who deals with customer complaints ... because I've been there. [Eek!] [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
dam ... my printer isnt working again ... calling MM ... oh its the power button ... never mind. Rod

Good one, Rod ... (see my earlier post to HT and MM) ... and I hate working on printers most of all. [Big Grin]
 
Posted by Bottomliner on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Jennifercd10:
Just got back from doing the Happy Dance. Anyone else out doing the Happy Dance?

Jenn
Sorta ... just got home from playing a Texas Holdem tournament ... and I'm doing a Happy Dance around the money I won.

Now I can afford to reclaim my kidneys from the local pawn shop ... or I may buy a few million shares of QBID instead. Decisions, decisions. [Confused] .
 
Posted by firefly on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Monopoly Money:
Ill go in 51-49 with ya [Smile] as long as we get the investors to pay for it [Big Grin]

quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
Sounds like too much stress mm. Want to buy a theater? We could go public LOL.


We can negotiate. But a good start.
 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
there could be a market for that.

lol

quote:
Originally posted by firefly:
First theater in Prescott. BRRRRRR


 
Posted by Penny-Trader on :
 
ahhh your kidneys can wait lol

[Big Grin]


quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by Jennifercd10:
Just got back from doing the Happy Dance. Anyone else out doing the Happy Dance?

Jenn
Sorta ... just got home from playing a Texas Holdem tournament ... and I'm doing a Happy Dance around the money I won.

Now I can afford to reclaim my kidneys from the local pawn shop ... or I may buy a few million shares of QBID instead. Decisions, decisions. [Confused] .


 
Posted by Marty on :
 
Increasing the A/S to 100 billion, shows a desperate need of funds....if they were profitable, they wouldn't dilute OR increase the A/S share count....the massive dilution is very clear in the T&S (to me)....JMHO....
quote:
Originally posted by MillerTIME:
As many know, i have been very negative towards QTN (Frank olsen) of late and will continue to post truthful negative actions by the company.

But, with that being said, i am impressed by recent actions being taken by the company - possible move by richard (IR) to burbank to become fulltime, search for CFO, possible stepdown of Frank from CEO position, DVD finally being shipped, PR stating 100% ownership.)

I do wonder if the company is now trying to turn over a new leaf.

In fact, to be truthful, a couple days earlier i was wondering if QTN was going bankrupt but i may have been completely mistaken.

There have been some great posts from IHUB today that i will be posting here.


 
Posted by Marty on :
 
I deal with this carp on a daily basis. The majority of computer problems today, are caused by uninformed users, who "see" adds, links, etc that they "need" this to clean their computer of spyware, or click on links that say, "download this for FREE", or they want to get music or some other something for free. There are 3 basic rules to safe internet use:
1) NEVER click on a link in an email from someone you don't know.
2) NEVER download an attachment in an email from someone you don't know.
3) NEVER click on a link on an internet site that says "in order to view this site, download....."

All BS.... and the best of all, is to lose IE and use Firefox.....half the problems are gone.....
Very simple. It's so sad how uninformed and unprotected people are from themselves....GLTA....
quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
LMAO MM, that is the reason I am no longer in software development!! I was a programmer for 8 years, the only problem was that I became tech support for every friend and family member I ever had!!

HT and MM
As a hobby, I "tune-up" computers for friends and relatives. For free, of course. It's amazing to me how little many computer users understand about their computers. I'm not poking fun at them, just pointing out how easily these people can be "fooled" into paying for unnecessary and overpriced repairs by professional repair shops.

I've fixed "broken" monitors by plugging them into an electrical outlet, sound systems by clicking off the mute button, and computer "freeze-ups" by removing a disk from the floppy drive during bootup. Once, I "fixed" a computer that a professional repair shop declared "dead" simply by replacing the RAM module ... a potential problem that apparently never occurred to the pros.

But mostly I fix "broken" computers by cleaning all the internet crap off the hard drive. People run McAfee or Norton virus scanners that are 3 years out of date and wonder why they have viruses ... and they download every "free" offer from the internet and wonder why spyware, adware and pop-ups have maxed out their hard drive. Some of the "anti-spyware" programs people install are actually worse spyware than what they are trying to prevent ... LOL.

Anyway ... I don't envy anyone who deals with customer complaints ... because I've been there. [Eek!] [Big Grin]


 
Posted by NextWeek on :
 
Liked your post about PCs and PC owner/users. I too "tune-up" (or did), repair, build PCs for friends, family and sometimes for pay. I've steered away (for the most part) because of the hassle. Folks for the most part just want to use their PCs for whatever without the up-keep.

I get few viruses (maybe 1 a year), very little spyware and the unique thing is I do not have any AV or ASW activated (running in the background). Running AV programs actually slow a PC down. I run those programs (free ones at that) maybe once a month and then shut 'em down.

I've been using Microsoft AntiSpyware (Beta=Free) and AntiVir (PE) and like those.

quote:
Originally posted by Bottomliner:
quote:
Originally posted by HossTrader:
LMAO MM, that is the reason I am no longer in software development!! I was a programmer for 8 years, the only problem was that I became tech support for every friend and family member I ever had!!

HT and MM
As a hobby, I "tune-up" computers for friends and relatives. For free, of course. It's amazing to me how little many computer users understand about their computers. I'm not poking fun at them, just pointing out how easily these people can be "fooled" into paying for unnecessary and overpriced repairs by professional repair shops.

I've fixed "broken" monitors by plugging them into an electrical outlet, sound systems by clicking off the mute button, and computer "freeze-ups" by removing a disk from the floppy drive during bootup. Once, I "fixed" a computer that a professional repair shop declared "dead" simply by replacing the RAM module ... a potential problem that apparently never occurred to the pros.

But mostly I fix "broken" computers by cleaning all the internet crap off the hard drive. People run McAfee or Norton virus scanners that are 3 years out of date and wonder why they have viruses ... and they download every "free" offer from the internet and wonder why spyware, adware and pop-ups have maxed out their hard drive. Some of the "anti-spyware" programs people install are actually worse spyware than what they are trying to prevent ... LOL.

Anyway ... I don't envy anyone who deals with customer complaints ... because I've been there. [Eek!] [Big Grin]


 
Posted by buckwheatbob on :
 
LOL, they don't let us give blood this time of year either unless it has a "Caution Flamible" sticker on it.

quote:
Originally posted by Penny-Trader:
lol


we just drink to keep the antifreeze in the blood lol

Rod


 
Posted by buckwheatbob on :
 
MT,

Well said but, what if this was the goal all along and it has just taken a lot longer to get there? Yes I agree Frank has done some things to really tick off everyone, blew PR's, released info to soon etc, but reading back, a lot of what we have now