posted
I wonder if this was the news that Frank said would make all the longs happy?
-------------------- M.M. Semester #3 started,Only 7 more semesters to go. Why, in an age where information is so easy to get, cant we find information on one man. Experience is something you dont get until just after you need it. Posts: 1002 | From: Southaven, Mississippi, US | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Just for the fun of it, I thought I would toss my two cents worth of thoughts into the fray.
I’m in Q for the long haul because:
Q is an expanding company both in product and scope. Recent worldwide interest is impressive. This consists of syndicated shows AND the entire signal. LOGO going beyond our boarders creates demand for Q by blazing the trail.
Q’s employee numbers are growing. People WANT to work for Q. An enthusiastic and vibrant work force. People are flocking to Q with new programming ideas.
The pps is in a disconnect from the company. Becoming transparent will help to resolve this.
New areas of opportunity have opened recently. Unforeseen revenue from the leasing of the studio. Revenue generated from NTI. Renting out the film library. Syndication. (The potential of Mary Hartman) Frank has a way of finding new opportunities for asset growth and network expansion.
Q has a growing asset base. The Burbank Studio. NTI The film library. The Gay Games VII and first right of refusal for Gay Games VIII. QTN itself.
The audit being complete means the next step(s) can be taken. Publishing the audit makes TMM a voluntary reporting company. A certified audit makes TMM a transparent company. Another “layer” of investors are waiting for the above. Resolving the “shell” issue with the SEC becomes far easer. The above paves the way to become Fully Reporting with the SEC. Another “layer” of investor is realized. The next step is to make application to an exchange. Just making an application to an exchange would invite another “layer”. Major investor groups and investment newsletters have been watching Q. Their time to act is close at hand. Q has the potential of becoming the next “Darling of Wall Street”.
I would not be invested in a company if:
Employees were being laid off while others were leaving for greener pastures. Cutting pay and benefits to its employees. A downtrodden work force.
It was selling its divisions and/or reducing the scope of others.
Selling assets.
Withdrawing from their historic marketplaces.
Increasing its debt to “get by” from previous profitability. Rescheduling its debt. Y/Y losses keep widening.
Not developing any new products.
Cuts advertising budget and its presence in its industry.
An increase of negative press from its industry and public media.
Vendors becoming hesitant doing business with the company.
Loss of company vision.
-------------------- Your greatest investment is into a peaceful heart. Posts: 699 | From: Tampa, Fl. | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by RiescoDiQui: Frank is screwing us.
You're Mexican... haha, I'm just saying some unprovable statements like you have been doing...
------------------------------------------------- Obviously they like what Frank is doing to them..ROFLMAO
It would be nice to have a CEO that does everything the way the shareholder wants it to go and succeeds to. I wonder how many times that has happened to you??SWAG
Honestly, I love what Frank is doing for me...I'm invested in an up and coming television network that's now in NYC...as long as the audit comes out at some point, my money is sitting in this stock in my ameritrade account until I make some legit gains OR until the stock goes bankrupt...I'm here for the ride...wherever I end up is fine with me...
I should have read further...hmmmmm
-------------------- Remember two things: You love New York City and leave only your footprints. Posts: 1526 | From: Chatham, NJ... and NC-- Wake Forest University | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
All we need is 4 more % of the company and a concensus opinion.
quote:Originally posted by holmes: There goes Frank and BS abuot how he dosen't need us shareholders. Dosen't put much confidence in someone that tells his shareholders to eat his crap. We own this company lets get rid of this guy.
quote:Originally posted by imakmony2005: Well i emailed frank and he said just tell him how many shares you have and at what pps and he would send you a check for the balance. way to go frankie.
-------------------- Still holding, Still waiting, ...
Don't forget to send your letter to Echostar/DISH Network. 20 letters a day gets Q some play :) Posts: 621 | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Think of WHO (carriers) has shook hands with Q and has yet to come, think of the professionals Frank has working for Q, think about Q's assets, and really think about ALL the a/s, o/s, p/s counts (not really bad considering Q’s position) but MOST MOST MOST importantly think about how Frank has been doing business RECENTLY as Q is rapidly getting bigger!
Unprofessionally? Yes! But at this juncture, and in the heart of negotiating with more carriers, in more markets, do you honestly give a damn?
Hey! I'll be the first to admit, he isn't the best CEO, but he is moving us forward.
And again, Jenn's probably right; he probably is buying more assets’, Mary Hartman Show? Something else? I don't know for sure but it does make sense.
Given the fact, of my learning the way he does business, I can only continue to believe that Frank is finally achieving his greatest feat and therefore I will continue and buy more shares.
Posts: 1236 | From: The Bluegrass State | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by davidjanas: richard is useless incase u guys havent figured that out.. the only way to get an answer is to go to frank...and even that is sometimes useless...last week when i talked to frank and he told me ny pr is coming out..even that came a week later. he mixes a little truth with a little fiction..i have no idea whats going on now.. but i think if we all put a little pressure on frank and act concerned maybe he will do something..pleae send frank emails asap..he does read them..if everyone sends a letter he will respond to us..please please please send a letter to frank tellilng him you are concerned...its the best thing we can do at this point.....theres no point of crying like bottomliner said....lets just email frank and let him know we are pissed
Is it franko*qtelevision.com ?
-------------------- Remember two things: You love New York City and leave only your footprints. Posts: 1526 | From: Chatham, NJ... and NC-- Wake Forest University | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
And those are all good reasons, Jen, but there needs to be a point where dilution stops. What good is it to have $5 billion in assets with a 300 billion O/S?
-------------------- "Please note that every week from now until the end of time is a 'coming week.' " Posts: 512 | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by davidjanas: richard is useless incase u guys havent figured that out.. the only way to get an answer is to go to frank...and even that is sometimes useless...last week when i talked to frank and he told me ny pr is coming out..even that came a week later. he mixes a little truth with a little fiction..i have no idea whats going on now.. but i think if we all put a little pressure on frank and act concerned maybe he will do something..pleae send frank emails asap..he does read them..if everyone sends a letter he will respond to us..please please please send a letter to frank tellilng him you are concerned...its the best thing we can do at this point.....theres no point of crying like bottomliner said....lets just email frank and let him know we are pissed
I have been sending e-mails all morning to different people at "Q".
Doc, maybe you'll get a response after the audit comes out...
-------------------- Remember two things: You love New York City and leave only your footprints. Posts: 1526 | From: Chatham, NJ... and NC-- Wake Forest University | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
The reason they don't just buy-back could be for several reasons:
1. It costs money to buy-back but it costs nothing to increase A/S
2. It takes time to buy-back 10-20 billion shares.
There's two of them.
I hear you. OK, it would take $5M to buy back 10B shares at the current price. And yes, time (of which there's been some, perhaps, but not a lot). If this company is really worth upwards to $1B I wonder why they can't raise $5-10M for a stock buyback?
Of course, none of us knows what financial options are available. Maybe such a loan is simply not possible. All I can say is my gut reaction is that if selling on the good news is the plan then they way it's being done is the path of least resistance but also one that does the most damage to the stockholders.
Now, what I hope is REALLY happening is that there are some assets Frank wishes to purchase with restricted stock and he needed to raise the A/S to make that stock available. What I'm REALLY pissed about is that it would have been nice for him to say "I have this really good deal that will be a big benifit to the company and need to issue x billion shares of restricted stock to complete it. I'll need to raise the A/S to do it." I feel like he (and I'm not going to single him out, it seems all penny stocks do the same) goes out of his way to insure that the stockholders and public do NOT know what's going on. Some day, I hope, the legitimate CEOs (i.e., the ones that are not just simply scamming) will wake up and see that this just gives them the appearence of scamming and keeps their stock price depressed and forces them to issue fluff PRs to try to counteract what simly straightforwardness would have prevented.
Whew, sorry to get long winded. Just needed to vent a little.
-------------------- The opinions expressed here by myself and others should be taken for what they are: opinions. Beware, many express opinion as fact. Do your own research from reputable sources and never invest more than you can afford to loose. ~,-,-< GatorMan Posts: 752 | From: Springville, Utah | Registered: Jan 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
I'm outta here. I dont care if its Monday. I gonna have me some beers and smoke a few cigarettes at the local water hole. And I hope to God no one rubs me wrong this evenining, because I am not a happy camper right now. LOL! It's been a tough day for all us Qbidians. Lets hope Frankie boy can pull something positive out of his scam-bag for us sharehodlers - for a change.
Posts: 1124 | From: DC/VA | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Jennifercd10: By guys. For those who want to stay upset, well, good luck. I’m going to get a manicure and pedicure. Then a glass of wine, soothing music and watch the sunset.
God bless you Jen! I've been a diehard QBID optimist for a couple years & should be rejoicing with todays news but Jill's post about AS being at 60 billion, which I believe is real has me very, very angry!
I think I am just getting confused again, personally.
But, hey, now we know where to go to look for additional amendments, right? It's this:
This is also the page which lists the telephone contact number to find out more on a particular business.
Posts: 65 | From: Palatka, FL | Registered: Nov 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
Yeah, I hear ya gator, and it would certainly be the more transparent, investor-friendly way to go, but leave it to Frank to do what he wants and up the A/S.
I'm not throwing out the possibility that there are good reasons that I could be happy about, but he is just so dishonest and sneeky all the time and it's about time we start making some money on our investment.
-------------------- 9.0M QBID locked and loaded! Posts: 605 | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by QBID'n: Think of WHO (carriers) has shook hands with Q and has yet to come, think of the professionals Frank has working for Q, think about Q's assets, and really think about ALL the a/s, o/s, p/s counts (not really bad considering Q’s position) but MOST MOST MOST importantly think about how Frank has been doing business RECENTLY as Q is rapidly getting bigger!
Unprofessionally? Yes! But at this juncture, and in the heart of negotiating with more carriers, in more markets, do you honestly give a damn?
Hey! I'll be the first to admit, he isn't the best CEO, but he is moving us forward.
And again, Jenn's probably right; he probably is buying more assets’, Mary Hartman Show? Something else? I don't know for sure but it does make sense.
Given the fact, of my learning the way he does business, I can only continue to believe that Frank is finally achieving his greatest feat and therefore I will continue and buy more shares.
He's moving his company forward at the shareholder's expense. THAT is what we can expect from him in the future if the past is ANY indication.
-------------------- "Please note that every week from now until the end of time is a 'coming week.' " Posts: 512 | Registered: Sep 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
actually i just had a thought, techncailly the only impact would be 4.9 billion shares if he wanted to maintain a 51% control of the company. Don't get me wrong it is still a large increase in OS but only 49% of it could be used for anything for him to stay at the helm.
Just thought id mention it unless it was something that was understood, in which case i did this for my own benefit.
-------------------- M.M. Semester #3 started,Only 7 more semesters to go. Why, in an age where information is so easy to get, cant we find information on one man. Experience is something you dont get until just after you need it. Posts: 1002 | From: Southaven, Mississippi, US | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
I think what pisses me off most is that really shallow stupid bashers that just threw out improbable worst case senarios, that they did not even believe themselves, in an effort to scare people into selling were closer to the truth than those of us with a vested interest!
quote:Originally posted by Jennifercd10: ... Sorry about the children line, I too get a little edgy.
Jenn I thought it was pretty neat ... I haven't been called a child in a long time.
And for the record, many posters ARE acting like children today. Especially the ones who are offended when you state simply: "Some people here act like children."
If the shoe fits ... or something like that.
-------------------- Everything I say is only my opinion ... right or wrong. Posts: 2152 | From: Ohio | Registered: Sep 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by jill1170: Well, I confirmed the 60 billion for myself as well, but via the WA SOS website:
-----Original Message----- From: Jill Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 11:42 AM To: SECSTATE - Corps Subject: Corporations Search Feedback from Web Site
Hello,
Yes, I found this site useful.
However, is it possible to find more information out about a company with a registered UBI?
Specifically, I would like to be able to search and find stock related information about the following company, without having to make a telephone call:
Triangle Multi Media UBI # 601 047 757
I have information that the A/S for common shares is at 60 billion. I am trying to confirm this number for myself.
It would be excellent to be able to find information of this nature directly from this website!
Thank you in advance for your assistance in this matter.
Regards, Jill
Here is the reply I received:
Confirmed.
An amendment was filed November 7th. "The capital stock of this corporation shall consist of 60,000,000,000 shares at no par value".
At this point, we do not have this information on our web site.
I hope this helps.
Hans
Woah, woah, woah...November OR October 7th?
-------------------- Remember two things: You love New York City and leave only your footprints. Posts: 1526 | From: Chatham, NJ... and NC-- Wake Forest University | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
btw is it me or where there a hell of a lot of sales at 9 million *.0004 after hours? Starting at 4:30 till 4:32 over 1 billion shares
Posts: 462 | From: FL | Registered: Oct 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
One thing that bothers me is that in the CC, Frank talked about being more honest and out-right with us. He wasn't doing it then and he's not doing it now.
The main thing that bothers me is that, again in the CC, Frank said he would not raise the O/S without letting the shareholders know (I think he even said vote on it) and the only reason he would raise it would be for Mary Hartman.
Again, as others have pointed out, the O/S might not have been raised, but increasing of the A/S sure doesn't look good.
Posts: 1028 | From: Georgia | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by jill1170: Well, I confirmed the 60 billion for myself as well, but via the WA SOS website:
-----Original Message----- From: Jill Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 11:42 AM To: SECSTATE - Corps Subject: Corporations Search Feedback from Web Site
Hello,
Yes, I found this site useful.
However, is it possible to find more information out about a company with a registered UBI?
Specifically, I would like to be able to search and find stock related information about the following company, without having to make a telephone call:
Triangle Multi Media UBI # 601 047 757
I have information that the A/S for common shares is at 60 billion. I am trying to confirm this number for myself.
It would be excellent to be able to find information of this nature directly from this website!
Thank you in advance for your assistance in this matter.
Regards, Jill
Here is the reply I received:
Confirmed.
An amendment was filed November 7th. "The capital stock of this corporation shall consist of 60,000,000,000 shares at no par value".
At this point, we do not have this information on our web site.
I hope this helps.
Hans
WA SOS Ok, now what's the deal with the expiration date (end of May 2006) and the date of incorporation 1951???
-------------------- Remember two things: You love New York City and leave only your footprints. Posts: 1526 | From: Chatham, NJ... and NC-- Wake Forest University | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Jennifercd10: By guys. For those who want to stay upset, well, good luck. I’m going to get a manicure and pedicure. Then a glass of wine, soothing music and watch the sunset.
God bless you Jen! I've been a diehard QBID optimist for a couple years & should be rejoicing with todays news but Jill's post about AS being at 60 billion, which I believe is real has me very, very angry!
I think I am just getting confused again, personally.
But, hey, now we know where to go to look for additional amendments, right? It's this:
This is also the page which lists the telephone contact number to find out more on a particular business.
Yes Jill! And I genuinely thank you for doing this research! It has helped me make a decision. I will not sell but I was planning on buying 50 million shares if we hit .0001! I am very firm in the fact that I will not buy more until I see an audit regardless of price per share!
posted
who would you rather have at the helm of a company, someone who is honest and forthright or someone who is dishonest and sneaky and knows how to avoid the pitfalls of a companies doom. Id rather have the sneaky varity myself because if he wins, we win. Frank is just as invested in this as we are, as a matter of fact 30+ billion more. just thought id point that out.
quote:Originally posted by Maestro232: I'm not throwing out the possibility that there are good reasons that I could be happy about, but he is just so dishonest and sneeky all the time and it's about time we start making some money on our investment.
-------------------- M.M. Semester #3 started,Only 7 more semesters to go. Why, in an age where information is so easy to get, cant we find information on one man. Experience is something you dont get until just after you need it. Posts: 1002 | From: Southaven, Mississippi, US | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
dj, I some questions you can ask Frank. What EXACTLY are the terms of the preferred shares he and his family owns? Are they convertable? If so, at what rate and are there enough unissued but authorized shares to cover the conversion? Do they have voting rights (I'd guess they do so he can keep control)? Do they represent 53% ownership regardless of how many common shares are issued (i.e., does the diluting of common shares affect his ownership percentage?)? The company should have a document that spells out all the rights and privileges for these shares. Unless he has something to hide there should be no reason not to give us this information.
This could help clear up a lot of speculation regarding what the pps should be based upon what the total worth of the company is.
Thanks.
-------------------- The opinions expressed here by myself and others should be taken for what they are: opinions. Beware, many express opinion as fact. Do your own research from reputable sources and never invest more than you can afford to loose. ~,-,-< GatorMan Posts: 752 | From: Springville, Utah | Registered: Jan 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
hey bottomliner i also in a little bit of a sick way enjoyed being called a child as it has been too long since someone refered to me as one. hehehe oh how lucky i am too be totally lost in hopes and dreams.am i crazy to still be excited about qtv. it seems as even our faithful qbidian whizard(whizknock) is quite upset.well u know what some say about gamblers they like to lose.......... ok now where am i going with all this oh yeah go q bring on the audit bring on the assets, bring on the new carriers bring on the advertising contracts and show your qness to the world.you are the true voice for the glbt community u must succeed on all levels.the public must love your programming and the investing community must be rewarded as well for making this possible.i know i am a sappy childish person but i am pleading that you stand by your words in that i will one day be a proud shareholder.to me the only thing that will make me proud is if my share in qtv is worth something.i have 20 million shares which i realise is a small amount compared to many but it is alot for me.i would one day like to see this company up close and see what we are making possible.make me proud franky cuz we all get what we have coming.one can only go on lying for so long before it comes back to haunt us.
-------------------- gotta know when to hold em and when to .......... Posts: 1525 | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by holmes: There goes Frank and BS abuot how he dosen't need us shareholders. Dosen't put much confidence in someone that tells his shareholders to eat his crap. We own this company lets get rid of this guy.
quote:Originally posted by imakmony2005: Well i emailed frank and he said just tell him how many shares you have and at what pps and he would send you a check for the balance. way to go frankie.
Be careful what you ask for, a reverse split comes with new mangement...
Posts: 1235 | From: Anacortes, WA | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
From what I remember from the CC, Frank stated that the O/S was 44 billion and he did go on to say that included his 53% or that the number was pre changing his/his kid's shares (supposed, since it wasn't fully done).
Now, if the A/S doesn't include his shares, then he already had tons of room to dilute before raising the A/S.
So, I'm pretty sure the A/S includes all of the shares, but I'm going off what Frank tells us .
Posts: 1028 | From: Georgia | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by imakmony2005: MJM2005, Man you got what like maybe 500 bucks in this, i wish i were you at this point in time on this stock, but chill.
I have an average cost of 0012... so it's about 1000... I may put more in...but I'm checking out other options...
-------------------- Remember two things: You love New York City and leave only your footprints. Posts: 1526 | From: Chatham, NJ... and NC-- Wake Forest University | Registered: Jul 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by milliam: One thing that bothers me is that in the CC, Frank talked about being more honest and out-right with us. He wasn't doing it then and he's not doing it now.
The main thing that bothers me is that, again in the CC, Frank said he would not raise the O/S without letting the shareholders know (I think he even said vote on it) and the only reason he would raise it would be for Mary Hartman.
Again, as others have pointed out, the O/S might not have been raised, but increasing of the A/S sure doesn't look good.
I agree Milliam! He's taking this to a place where only radical moves would be able to make this a stock that can post gains!
quote:Originally posted by Monopoly Money: actually i just had a thought, techncailly the only impact would be 4.9 billion shares if he wanted to maintain a 51% control of the company. Don't get me wrong it is still a large increase in OS but only 49% of it could be used for anything for him to stay at the helm.
Just thought id mention it unless it was something that was understood, in which case i did this for my own benefit.
-------------------- Still holding, Still waiting, ...
Don't forget to send your letter to Echostar/DISH Network. 20 letters a day gets Q some play :) Posts: 621 | Registered: Jun 2005
| IP: Logged |
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Confused]](confused.gif)
![[Smile]](smile.gif)
![[Roll Eyes]](rolleyes.gif)
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Frown]](frown.gif)
