Come on Ghosty show your true colors, we know who you are same old crap, different day.
Posting a bit more, same pattern
-------------------- Be Careful Of The Toes We Step On Today, They Could Be Attached To The Butt We Have To Kiss Tomorrow Posts: 4727 | From: Elk Grove ( Sacramento )CA USA | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by shlik: Sellback the dirty shell shares.
Thats better Ghosty, now come out of that closet you can do better than that
-------------------- Be Careful Of The Toes We Step On Today, They Could Be Attached To The Butt We Have To Kiss Tomorrow Posts: 4727 | From: Elk Grove ( Sacramento )CA USA | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by shlik: Five for a penny.
Gotcha Ghosty So how many shares are you looking for this time? The last time you were here you bashed for about 10 days and then bragged about how much you made when you sold.
GO QBID!!!!! Bring On The Green
-------------------- Be Careful Of The Toes We Step On Today, They Could Be Attached To The Butt We Have To Kiss Tomorrow Posts: 4727 | From: Elk Grove ( Sacramento )CA USA | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
i'm a little worried about frank. he looks like he's ready to have a heart-attack in this interview. our boy may need to start worrying more about his health and excercising some. jmho. don't wanna lose the brains behind the operation. if you know what i mean.
-------------------- I'M GONNA BE RICH BEFORE I'M 30!!!! Posts: 502 | From: spring lake, nc, usa | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by shlik: Hey, I bet if you look at the pps chart from Austrailia it looks great!
I would not be able to find it because its AUSTRALIA.
Hey guess what you are still the Village Idiot
-------------------- Be Careful Of The Toes We Step On Today, They Could Be Attached To The Butt We Have To Kiss Tomorrow Posts: 4727 | From: Elk Grove ( Sacramento )CA USA | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
A few months ago, I spoke with the owner of a product that was being distributed through a .. uh... distributor. I was interested in buying stock in the distributor. The name is not important because it turned out to be a non-issue. Turns out he wanted to buy back his product from the distributor and go private with his product. ANNNNyway... here's where I'm going with this:
When I asked about the PPS of the stock, he said he was "working with" a MM, and if he wanted, he could "make a call", and they could run the stock up to a buck. (He didn't - He was just trying to make a point) He actually wanted to keep the PPS low, so he could buy it all back.
The point is, if what he said was true, that means it is possible that Frank is also "working with" a MM or MMs. So the question arises:
What if the low PPS has actually been orchestrated by Frank all along? Wouldn't that shed some light on his past statement that he would "Stick it to the daytraders"? Really... What else could he have meant? How else could he "Stick it to the daytraders"? Maybe he planned all along to bring the price down, so he could buy, knowing that only those in it for the long haul would benefit...
Does ANY of that make any sense?
Posts: 1872 | From: right here | Registered: Apr 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Good exposure in that interview. I would agree, Frank needs some polishing (wax on, wax off). Maybe add a 'Speech Teacher' to that $1mill burn rate. Be worth every cent. Also, IMHO, as a corporate exec, he might also want to think about adding a tie to that suite (No, it's not a stereotype, it just works). Otherwise, he did appear knowledgable, sincere, genuine and abreast to the industry market/ activities and focused on the companies business plan goals.....both short and long....just my observations...GL....
-------------------- Marty When I was born, I was granted a visitors pass to earth. I will enjoy everyday until it has expired. You should too ;) Posts: 1740 | From: NJ, USA | Registered: Oct 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by WinsumLosesum: For what it's worth...
A few months ago, I spoke with the owner of a product that was being distributed through a .. uh... distributor. I was interested in buying stock in the distributor. The name is not important because it turned out to be a non-issue. Turns out he wanted to buy back his product from the distributor and go private with his product. ANNNNyway... here's where I'm going with this:
When I asked about the PPS of the stock, he said he was "working with" a MM, and if he wanted, he could "make a call", and they could run the stock up to a buck. (He didn't - He was just trying to make a point) He actually wanted to keep the PPS low, so he could buy it all back.
The point is, if what he said was true, that means it is possible that Frank is also "working with" a MM or MMs. So the question arises:
What if the low PPS has actually been orchestrated by Frank all along? Wouldn't that shed some light on his past statement that he would "Stick it to the daytraders"? Really... What else could he have meant? How else could he "Stick it to the daytraders"? Maybe he planned all along to bring the price down, so he could buy, knowing that only those in it for the long haul would benefit...
Does ANY of that make any sense?
You can't stop day traders.. by keepin it low just helps us grab more shares at lower prices and frank.. but when it runs it will be because of the day traders.. they will make money either way.. it doesn't hurt day traders by keeping the price this low.. they could careless.. they jump in when it runs and out when it stops..
-------------------- "Never stop dreaming." the most successful ppl in the world dream about things they want and then go after those dreams.. dream big and work to make those dreams a reality.
Warning all posts by this person are considered to be false and not factual. Posts: 2201 | From: Tampa | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
About 1 billion dirty shell shares should be sold to pay a law firm the retainer on the Oxygen lawsuit.
Posts: 348 | From: seattle | Registered: May 2005
| IP: Logged |
First so glad you're posting regularly again; I really missed you whilst you were gone. I appreciate you on ICAN, also! I completely "got you" over there recently, too bad the others didn't!
Anyway, I've always believed that there was a much more symbiotic relationship between MM's and principals than is ever disclosed.
Keeping it down right now, yes, I'll buy that. However, I don't even want to entertain the notion that Frank, or any other CEO would run his stock price down. Ethics aside, the liability involved with doing that, then keeping multiple parties quiet, would be enormous.
I've always thought that someone from this board should be on that "phantom" board of directors. . .no, I'm not going there tonight, lol
I mean a real board. And I'd like to publically go behind you, Winsum, Doc and Whiz. All of you seem dedicated, intelligent AND literate.
Posts: 260 | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
"You can't stop day traders.. by keepin it low just helps us grab more shares at lower prices and frank.. but when it runs it will be because of the day traders.. they will make money either way.. it doesn't hurt day traders by keeping the price this low.. they could careless.. they jump in when it runs and out when it stops.." -andrewAAB
I gotta say, I never have read a thread on the daytraders board where they wrote stuff like "Damn that low QBID pps is hurting us." Or even, "This really sucks waiting for QBID to go up." It seems like they have hundreds of other stocks to run after. And according to the buyback laws posted by Rod on page ten it's illegal to manipulate the pps for buyback purposes...I seems foolish for Frank to take that kind of risk while trying simultaneously to move to another board.
Posts: 1235 | From: Anacortes, WA | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by shlik: About 1 billion dirty shell shares should be sold to pay a law firm the retainer on the Oxygen lawsuit.
FLUSH
GO QBID!!!!!!! Bring On The Green
-------------------- Be Careful Of The Toes We Step On Today, They Could Be Attached To The Butt We Have To Kiss Tomorrow Posts: 4727 | From: Elk Grove ( Sacramento )CA USA | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by LEO: "You can't stop day traders.. by keepin it low just helps us grab more shares at lower prices and frank.. but when it runs it will be because of the day traders.. they will make money either way.. it doesn't hurt day traders by keeping the price this low.. they could careless.. they jump in when it runs and out when it stops.." -andrewAAB
I gotta say, I never have read a thread on the daytraders board where they wrote stuff like "Damn that low QBID pps is hurting us." Or even, "This really sucks waiting for QBID to go up." It seems like they have hundreds of other stocks to run after. And according to the buyback laws posted by Rod on page ten it's illegal to manipulate the pps for buyback purposes...I seems foolish for Frank to take that kind of risk while trying simultaneously to move to another board.
LOL well I post it sometimes when the Q runs.. I am a day trader, but a long in QBID as most know.. So I know none of us care if it isn't running or not(expect for me.. come on dollar!) day traders play what is hot.. talk about what is hot.. and don't know or care what is cold because they ain't playin it..
-------------------- "Never stop dreaming." the most successful ppl in the world dream about things they want and then go after those dreams.. dream big and work to make those dreams a reality.
Warning all posts by this person are considered to be false and not factual. Posts: 2201 | From: Tampa | Registered: Nov 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Frank Olsen, Q Television’s founder and CEO, said his network reaches viewers in Boston, San Francisco and New York City. By the end of June, viewership will be up to 16 million homes, he said. Plans are underway to have Q Television soon in Washington, D.C., Denver and Seattle, as well as Australia.
posted
And does LOGO have an estimated viewership for when they launch? I'll go find out!
Posts: 1235 | From: Anacortes, WA | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
"...Logo's ride to reality hasn't been smooth. It spent years on parent company Viacom's back burner and has seen its launch date postponed from February. This year's delay was partly to get more programming in place but was also because it had agreements to be in only 2 million to 3 million of the nation's nearly 110 million television homes.
Browning was quoted recently as saying she had found some resistance to the idea of a gay and lesbian network in meetings with cable or satellite providers. One executive threatened resignation if Logo were launched in the company's territory. She downplayed that in a subsequent interview.
"While there may be some initial trepidation, once they really understand what we're doing, the breadth of the audience and the breadth of the programming, they understand there is a great business opportunity," she said.
She said Logo will begin in 10 million homes, a significant percentage of the roughly 45 million homes with digital service. Logo isn't trying to reach analog homes...
It looks like 10 million. And both networks are going to be digital.
Posts: 1235 | From: Anacortes, WA | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
When LOGO launches Q Television will already have six million more viewers in place!
Posts: 1235 | From: Anacortes, WA | Registered: Apr 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
I've been wondering where the QBID shares for the buyback are coming from, without a runup in share price. Here's what I think may happen behind the scenes:
Frank buys 50 or 100 million shares from the MMs after close. The MM doesn't own the shares, but simply (naked) short.
Next trading day, the MMs manipulate the share price lower, and buy their shares back at a reduced price for a gain.
Next day, same procedure all over. So one would predict that the share price is under selling pressure during the buyback - which is paradoxical, since there's really a lot of buying pressure! This nicely fits with FOT's assessment that technically the price may drop more in the short term. Let's see what happens.
Even better, the lower the share price drops, the more shareholders will panick and sell. This actually tends to increase the daily volume, so that Frank can buy back his shares even faster.
The conclusion is that the shares for the buyback come from people who panick and sell during the drop (the weak hands).
Does this make any sense?
Posts: 323 | From: Honolulu | Registered: Sep 2003
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by firefly: Yes Rich, I liked the interview. I am actually more excited about Australia and backing through 2008. Frank looked good but was nervous. That's OK he is front page Market Watch news.
I was seeing that.But it looks more to be a health issue than anything else.He is starting to pack on the beef. He better not kak on us before this thing flys.
quote:Originally posted by Penny-Trader: 15000 subscriber carriage in australiea July
TW agressively
fighting the battle for 11 years. Logo is a blessing
they all compliment each other
enough money to break even in 2008.
WOW
Rod
I listened that whole interview Rod, no where was there any indication of bad news.It sounds like the flood gate has opened for Q to pretty much go world wide now that Viacom has opened the gate.As Frank said,a blessing indisguise.
quote:Originally posted by WinsumLosesum: For what it's worth...
A few months ago, I spoke with the owner of a product that was being distributed through a .. uh... distributor. I was interested in buying stock in the distributor. The name is not important because it turned out to be a non-issue. Turns out he wanted to buy back his product from the distributor and go private with his product. ANNNNyway... here's where I'm going with this:
When I asked about the PPS of the stock, he said he was "working with" a MM, and if he wanted, he could "make a call", and they could run the stock up to a buck. (He didn't - He was just trying to make a point) He actually wanted to keep the PPS low, so he could buy it all back.
The point is, if what he said was true, that means it is possible that Frank is also "working with" a MM or MMs. So the question arises:
What if the low PPS has actually been orchestrated by Frank all along? Wouldn't that shed some light on his past statement that he would "Stick it to the daytraders"? Really... What else could he have meant? How else could he "Stick it to the daytraders"? Maybe he planned all along to bring the price down, so he could buy, knowing that only those in it for the long haul would benefit...
dont know what will happen today i aggree with the technical analysis that the chart looks bad right now.i know this stock runs more on news than technicals but with no news im sad to say im happy i look forward to everytime this stock goes down thats one more week to accumulate at better prices.i have my first million and im gonnna go for another .stay strong qbidders move stuff around buy more have faith and accumulate.the more strong hands we have the less we will have to wait in the long run for our beachfront properties hehe. i hope you all have a good day today.so ill mention once more is any of you playing lucent technologies.i have calls if this is a short squeeze on lucent the stock could run to 8 bucks.the jan 2007 calls are like 20 by 25 for the five strike.if the stock runs to even 7 bucks those options go from 25$ a contract to about 220$ not bad.ok now im borderline crossing the border i know this is the qbid board but i thoughtthis is a good play and only want my q friends to prosper in all your trades so that you can buy more qbid.hehehe
-------------------- gotta know when to hold em and when to .......... Posts: 1525 | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
hey man he is 70 years old. most people dont have have of his mocy at half his age. im sure he will bo ok
Rod
quote:Originally posted by airdoo: i'm a little worried about frank. he looks like he's ready to have a heart-attack in this interview. our boy may need to start worrying more about his health and excercising some. jmho. don't wanna lose the brains behind the operation. if you know what i mean.
-------------------- Dont buy or sell on my opinions, do your research. Make sure you know what you are buying before you buy.
This is a non reporting pink sheet with very high risk. From high risk comes high rewards. Dont invest more then you can afford to lose. Posts: 4801 | From: Prescott, ON, Canada | Registered: May 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by shlik: About 1 billion dirty shell shares should be sold to pay a law firm the retainer on the Oxygen lawsuit.
Isn't the law suit thing getting a little old? You need some new material. I think if you go to RB you'll have more fun. Now run off, I hear your mama calling ( I think she wants to change your dirty shell hanging from your bottom )
Posts: 1271 | From: Sincinnati , Ohio | Registered: Feb 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
I didn't realize he's 70. For that age he looks good. Here's to Frank's health!!
quote:Originally posted by Penny-Trader: hey man he is 70 years old. most people dont have have of his mocy at half his age. im sure he will bo ok
Rod
quote:Originally posted by airdoo: i'm a little worried about frank. he looks like he's ready to have a heart-attack in this interview. our boy may need to start worrying more about his health and excercising some. jmho. don't wanna lose the brains behind the operation. if you know what i mean.
quote:Originally posted by Ligge: I have a naive pink question in relation to the buyback/MMs and PPS.
If there is a agreement between issuer and broker(s) couldnt they hold the price steady on purpose regardless of how many shares traded?
I dont see why they couldnt, I can understand why they wouldnt, but I can also understand why they would do so if they knew that the stock was in buyback mode this would be a good time for them to keep the price steady to allow it to happen so as they could also be accumulating themselves?
Have the after hours purchases been through the same broker every day or is it changing on a daily or bidaily basis. The way I understood the "one broker" requirement was it was for that session, not for an extended period.
Everyones favorite seer/jester has said a few comments of late that strike me as more interesting now. He said that there would be large 5 mil and 9 mil buys coming at the end of day and he also said something to the effect that the swing traders were not going to be happy soon. "Soon" would be now as that post was a week or more ago.
So if they are all intentionally holding the price down and the buyback is truly occurring he was correct in both of those statements...
This never got answered when I asked it this weekend but it seems the subject has come up again and is being discussed by some now.
So am I right, the MMs do make the prices and ultimately they could hold this at whatever they felt was justified for as long as they wanted?
In the big MM stock price picture the only downside to them doing so is that eventually people will quit selling, but if 20 billion (hypothetical exaggeration guys dont turn that into an O/S A/S number lol) shares changed hands today and there were still people that would sell then price would never have to moved until Frabk or MM said so, right?
PS. We are going to be rich (and not just in name for some of you!)
Posts: 482 | From: Arizona | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged |
posted
may frank have health wealth and vitality we will keep frank in our thoughts and collectively we will keep him in good health.one we will do this becuase if we see another human in need we have the obligation to help and two we all want to be filthy rich hehe . long live frank and qbid.
-------------------- gotta know when to hold em and when to .......... Posts: 1525 | Registered: Mar 2005
| IP: Logged |
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
same old crap, different day.
![[Wink]](wink.gif)
(No, it's not a stereotype, it just works). Otherwise, he did appear knowledgable, sincere, genuine and abreast to the industry market/ activities and focused on the companies business plan goals.....both short and long....just my observations...GL....![[Frown]](frown.gif)
