posted
Help, I need delayed level IIs - anybody got good links, the one I have firewall is blocking. Posts: 1021 | From: Canada | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Well I dont mean to offend but I thought sarki was a hot asian lady. sorry they need to have a profile thing in here. I will say one thing. He might just be right oct 19 - 21 might need to mark it on my calander after all. Just a feeling of course. lets see what transpires. Its either going to be something that is going to royaly piz everyone off or its something that is going to make us smile. I feel news comming. just my opinion only.
Posts: 123 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
...........and you base this opinion on your feelings?
quote:Originally posted by sdrobert: Well I dont mean to offend but I thought sarki was a hot asian lady. sorry they need to have a profile thing in here. I will say one thing. He might just be right oct 19 - 21 might need to mark it on my calander after all. Just a feeling of course. lets see what transpires. Its either going to be something that is going to royaly piz everyone off or its something that is going to make us smile. I feel news comming. just my opinion only.
Posts: 4893 | From: Burbank IL USA | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
to whoever asked you see these 9.999.999 trades because the system doesn`t go up to 10.mill i`m sill wondering why they are not 9.mill and who is trading them.there has always been huge lot`s of them onetime time like 40 in in like 20 min. or so if i remember correctly.
and if sarki is a hot asian lady and this thing goes to 0.10 on the 21st i would like to meet her in vegas ,even if she smokes cigars.
o.k. jokes asides are we getting a forward split on ucad
or to i add to the rumours .it has allready been previously considered and the outstanding shares in cmkx would actually be 1/3 of the previous calculation
on the other hand there was that rumour, from one of the big guys last week saying that the amount of our ucad dividends could still change.
posted
Where are all the doubters that insisted that the UCAD dividend would never be seen?
I seem to remember that there were quite a few people that made jokes about getting the dividend at all. Oh sure, now they say they are restricted, so what did we actually get? But that was not the comments stated here. There were some that laughed at the dividend even being paid at all. Where are you guys?
EVERYTHING stated by this company has come to pass. Time frames change, but that's how things work. NOW, we get a forward split on the UCAD dividend. Seems to me that a forward split is a good thing for a stock...right? Why is UCAD rising? Why? There's something out of the ordinary happening here. It's all good. It's not on your timeframe, but it's good.
It's getting real hard to doubt this stock as the days go on. Yeah, maybe it's taking a little longer than short sellers would like, but the confidence level is rising.
I look at both sides of the story. I think there has been some quality questions concerning this stock. There's been some quality positive estimates, also.
This board has developed into a "Let's find out who's a joke" board. Most make fun of guestimates, make fun of theroies and make fun of physical appearances of others. Some make fun of anything concerning CMKX and spend countless hours trying to discredit this company. I'm finding that even here, there is a sense of belief that yes, maybe this might be something. Oh, I know, some of you won't admit it, but most of you deep down think that maybe it could be something exciting.
I visit this board to bring me back down to earth since I tend to dream a little much. The problem is, there's been nothing stated here that makes me doubt this stock. Kind of dissappointing. Come on guys, you can do better than this. I think you are mostly being converted.
"EVERYTHING stated by this company has come to pass."
Which company are you refering to, CMKX or UCAD. Seems you're mixing apples and oranges.
When it was rumored a forward split, yes I doubted it. When they PR'd, and gave it more credence I was happy to see it.
UCAD seems to be much more forthright and forthcoming in their reporting. Unfortuantely, I purchased CMKX who stand to learn a few things from UCAD's forthrightness and keeping its word to shareholders.
Posts: 4893 | From: Burbank IL USA | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
CMKX kinda reminds me of that movie Gremlins and somebody just spilled the water on Gizzmo.HA HA HA
Posts: 2634 | From: The highway | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Answer question to me. Yes just on a feeling. as for the gremlins I understand that funny statement. Member what happened when you poored water on a gremlin they multipied. There are so many CMKX shares that someone must have doused water. or with water you get diluted. Funny water dilutes --- Gremlins multiply with water--- authorizing lots and lots of shares makes it diluted!!! both can be dangerous and wreck havoc on your investment/ house money ect ect.
Posts: 123 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
Rememeber Melvin and his Mt. St, Helens prediction. "this is big folks, I mean real big", going on and on. Then CMKX Pr'd that the samples had diamondferus present, independent lab and all, blah blah blah... Then UCAD and other jv partners were halted on the Canadian exchanges until there was a fair playing field. Did we find out about the REAL diamond content in those samples form CMKX or was it forced through the Canadian exchange in an effort to make the jv's be forthright about exacly what was found? What was found? Two micro diamonds.
How about the increase in A/S? How did we come to know about that? Through forthright reporting from CMKX? No it was through the efforts of someone calling the Nevada Secretary of State.
I just don't see them being forthright and out in front with their reporting.
You say all the PR's have pretty much come through. Well, if you consider how ambiguous and incomplete they are I guess you could be right. The one saying diamondferus was present, I guess is/was true, but it was so open ended that sure it could be true, and it also gives them a high degree of deniability. It's like telling someone you are having an exceptional day, but you forget to mention it is exceptionally crappy.
Look, I'm not bashing this thing. I'm just asking that they be more forthright, forthcoming, complete with their PR's. Yes, I liked getting the UCAD dividend, I like the F/S. I sure would like to see the goods and know the truth regarding CMKX.
Where are the results of the second set of core samples? O/S had to be calculated from the UCAD dividend. (and are still not believed to be 780B by some} Where are they in the process of becoming a reporting company.
I understand you can't answer those questions, but would you not think CMKX could and should?
quote:Originally posted by RaiderJR: Yep, the bashers were wrong about the divvy.
As far as CMKX not keeping their word, there are some theories and some things Uncle Melvie said that did not come to pass.
I think the theories were non company people and Melvin was just trying too hard.
All the pr's seem to have come true pretty close to what was said.
Posts: 4893 | From: Burbank IL USA | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
They should give info as best for the company. Being dishonest usually hurts companies in the long run.
Posts: 279 | From: Neodesha Ks USA | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Have they been forthright and honest in your estimation? The theories you mentioned that might not have happened I won't even ask which ones have, because the best I can see very few if any have.
quote:Originally posted by RaiderJR: They should give info as best for the company. Being dishonest usually hurts companies in the long run.
Posts: 4893 | From: Burbank IL USA | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:All the pr's seem to have come true pretty close to what was said.
Well, starting with their diamondiferous p/r of the Carolyn pipe, I guess you could say that was "accurate" but everyone here knows it was at minimum a bending of the truth.
Next was a transfer agent switch and a full accounting and disclosure of the companys share count. They were with Global then and are with Global now and we don't know the structure so I'd have to question that one.
Then they announced that they and their partners had a airborne survey done with startling results. The results of that survey are shown on CMKX handouts but none of the partners have mentioned or are publishing those results.
Then there was a whole bunch of claims purchases by outsiders with us receiving the dividends. So far they have paid one late with more pending. I'll concede that point to you.
My point is, this company has nothing more than a deceitful at best history behind it. Maybe a leopard can change his spots but I don't think this one has. CMKX has not filed to become a reporting company yet. Those documents are public record and there are none to be found on the SEC website. Registration is a lengthy process, with no filings to date I'd speculate they are at best a full year or more away from achieving it. Then there's Roger Glenn. People say that there is no way he'd get involved with CMKX if it wasn't on the up and up. He absolutely would, in fact he'd jump at the chance. He and his firm don't solicit individuals cases, they are after corporate accounts. If he can clean up a mess like this imagine what it could do for their corporate resume. Any firm in trouble would know where to look. Sorry for the ramble here but so many people are postulating so many different things here when the truth, in my opinion, is so obvious.
posted
let`s not forget the market is a battleground. don`t expect every p.r. to be staightforward when even positive p.r.s sometimes don`t do anything for the pps and the best plays are the most unpredictable ones! but they have to have some fundamentals that you believe in. let`s put it this way we have dividends ,of course restricted 1.we have huge amounts of mining rights with huge prospects of finding something. 2.we have a huge amount of outstanding shares.
these two are the current value of the pps actually that would be 16 mill. if i`m not mistaken and how much are they paying out in dividends something is wrong with this picture could somebody help me!!!!
what would happen if one of the two basic valuations would change or both as a matter of fact both o/s and value! and what about the companies they are involved with. it`s not like a single company that could be scam. there is ucad and there are other companies. and again roger glenn is not specialized in bankruptcies.
and cmkx is not trading at lofty levels and on no volume! right!
posted
well we do know that the ucad dividend was split up into 779 billion shares thus the o/s is the same as the split would be differant if it was for the 800 billion a/s but i will give those that think the o/s or float is less. the more i think about it why wouldn't UC want to keep part of ucad in cmkx, why give the whole thing to us shareholders. ucad is becoming at strong company and cmkx could use something positive on it's books. as the a/s was increased so fast before the own by date and once the dividend was paid to those shares they could be retired and thus the true float not be 779 billion but back to the 483 billion before the a/s increase. as for cmkx's prs...i dont think the word forthright & the phrase completely honest should be used in the same post as cmkx. plus nif they were "completely honest" we wouldn't have as much to guess about and all the entertainment value of cmkx would be gone & of course we know thats why we bought cmkx shares in the first place
Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
Webcast Interview with CMKM Diamonds, Inc CEO Urban Casavant and U.S. Canadian Minerals CEO Rendal Williams to be available exclusively to Green Baron Members!!!
The Green Baron Report proudly announces that it has just concluded an audio taped interview with CMKM Diamonds, Inc. CEO Mr. Urban Casavant and U.S. Canadian Minerals CEO Mr. Rendal Williams. Although CMKM Diamonds has not announced that it has concluded its filing to become a fully reporting company yet, we encouraged Mr. Casavant that patient shareholders of CMKX deserve to at least hear his voice. We suggest that all interested Green Baron listen for answers that might help instill and inspire confidence to continue holding CMKX stock during a frustrating time where the stock does not seem to respond to good news.
Each member that is in our database will receive an email this Sunday late afternoon/ evening, October 17 that will include a special link enabling you to listen to the CMKX/UCAD CEO webcast. We will make the webcast available to the general public at some point on Monday, October 18. The Green Baron Report is going to begin providing only our members with special updates and privileges. In the near future, we have plans to have parts of our website only accessible to members.
We suggest that if you are reading this email, and are not currently a Green Baron member to go to our website now at www.*************.com and click one of the JOIN buttons. Once again, we DO NOT share your email with other companies, and we will not fill your email box up with junk. Our members are sacred to us, and we want you to be happy Green Baron members forever, and of course, make piles of money. It does take a little time to add your email address into our database, so please be patient if you do not get the first report we send out following the day you join.
The Green Baron Report has reviewed its stance on CMKX stock and will issue the following opinion. Never have we seen in all our days an opportunity like this. Even if CMKX has issued every single share of its authorized, the valuation of the company at .0002 would be only $160 million. CMKM Diamonds owns a substantial percentage of the claims of all minerals in nearly 2 million acres mostly in the vicinity of Fort a La Corne, Saskatchewan. It also owns 200 billion shares of St. George Minerals (SGGM), has accepted nearly $20 million in cash over the last few months, and now bought into mining interests for uranium. The company holds interests in Juina Mining (GEMM), and is closely involved with U.S. Canadian Minerals (UCAD) whose stock ran over 300% recently to over $18 per share and announced a 3 for 1 forward stock split.
So is this property worth anything? If you don’t accept the opinion, stock and cash of companies like U.S. Canadian Minerals and St. George Minerals, perhaps a neighbor holding claims on property in the Fort a la Corne area might help with that question. An article that appeared in the Melfort Journal on Monday, October 12, written by Colin McGarrigle, reports that project executives for the Kensington/De Beers Diamond Project in the Fort a la Corne area recently stated nothing but optimism for further exploration of diamonds in the region. In the article, president of Kensington Resources Robert McCallum stated, “If everything goes as well as we hope, this could be the largest, low-cost, long-life diamond site in the world.” We urge our members to read the entire article by clicking http://www.melfortjournal.com/story.php?id=121486.
The Green Baron Report is not sure why more details of CMKX drilling programs have not been released. Perhaps the company wishes to wait till it files to become a fully reporting company and the stock is listed on the Bulletin Board. Perhaps there are competitive reasons that keep it from releasing details at this time. Perhaps the Company has not found anything of substance to report. Regardless of what the reason is, we believe CMKX now has the money, the contacts, and the overall resources to support programs to find minerals worth much more than $160 million. There are numbers commonly thrown around that CMKX is sitting on resources worth over $1 trillion. Our number is somewhere in between, but only time will tell.
At lease two partners of Evergreen Marketing, parent company of The Green Baron Report, will be attending the Las Vegas shareholder appreciation event being held October 29-31. We look forward to meeting many of our members, and we are predicting the event will be very festive. In case you have not figured it out by now, we still believe CMKX is The Stock Play of a Lifetime.
Final note: Our policy is to not acknowledge specific individuals that post on the message boards. We have never specifically supported any post by the multitude of members on these chat forums. However, we will do this once. An extremely respected, well-liked Green Baron and Raging Bull member who regularly posted positive remarks about CMKX under the alias cash_flow4me named Ty Merrick was tragically killed in an auto accident earlier this week. In fact, our CEO Ed Miller, had the pleasure of meeting him at the recently held NHRA Dallas event. Our prayers and best wishes go to his wife and 2 year-old son.
In honor of Ty, we are providing a link that will take you to cash_flow’s last post. It strangely sums up how we believe shareholders should view CMKX, and we could not agree more with what we believe are prophetic words. Please click this link to read: http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CLB01219&read=95060. Finally, for those who would like to send his family good wishes and support, please go to http://www.memorialsonline.com.
posted
Some "ladens" from another site on shorting -
Motley Fool Short Answers on Shorting Wednesday October 13, 10:23 am ET By Selena Maranjian
If you've ever wondered what shorting a stock is all about, check out this brief intro to the concept. Basically, shorting a stock involves reversing the order of the old adage to "buy low, sell high," as it's where investors aim to sell high and then buy low. As an example, if you wanted to short Carrier Pigeon Communications (ticker: SQAWK), your brokerage will "borrow" shares from a SQAWK shareholder's account and proceed to sell them for you at the current high price. The proceeds of the sale go into your account. Then, once the share price drops, you'll "cover" your short by buying shares on the market at a lower price to replace the ones you borrowed. If you shorted SQAWK at $35 and covered when it fell to $20, you made $15 per share (less commissions).
You can't short any stock, though. To be shorted, a stock needs to qualify as "marginable." That means investors can purchase shares on margin, with funds borrowed from their brokerages. Most stocks on the New York Stock Exchange are marginable, and many Nasdaq stocks also qualify, while stocks trading for less than $5 per share often do not.
Learn more in these eye-opening Fool articles on shorting:
The Art of Shorting Is Shorting Stocks Foolish? Shorting Stocks: Tax Aspects
posted
net-sec, Don't give up on "Buckshot" just yet. Take a look at this:
On November 25, 2002 the Company agreed to acquire the Casavant Family Mineral Claims in certain kimberlite deposits located in the Province of Saskatchewan, Canada. The Mineral Claims were held in the name of five companies owned directly and/or beneficially by the Casavant Family and Morgain Minerals, Inc. (a company held by third parties with the claims under option). These companies include Commando Holdings, Ltd., Buckshot Holdings, Ltd., 101010307 Saskatchewan Ltd., 101012190 Saskatchewan Ltd., and 101027101 Saskatchewan Ltd. In addition, Fort a la Corne Diamond Fields, Inc. acted as the claims and exploration manager for the five companies above, as well as, the claims held by Morgain Minerals, Inc. Each of these companies have agreed to transfer 100% of the Mineral Claims to the Company in accordance with the Mineral Disposition Regulations of Saskatchewan, 1986.
This is copied from CMKX's registration statement back when Urban first took over. Where it says "the Company agreed to acquire the Casavant Family Mineral Claims" they are referring to CMKX buying these claims from Urban. Supposedly any claims that Urban held under the name Buckshot were transferred to CMKX. Don't know why they still list them under the Buckshot name unless it's a different company or different claims held by Urban separate from CMKX.
posted
******************** Don't know why they still list them under the Buckshot name unless it's a different company or different claims held by Urban separate from CMKX. ********************
Yea Upside I read through it and your last statement is what has me a little worried. What if it is different claims help by Urban not included in CMKX...and those are the damn claims that actually produce diamonds. Wouldn't that be a kick in the ass.
posted
That's what's always bothered me about our supposed claims. We don't appear on this listing at all. At least two of Urbans former companies do but no CMKX anywhere. Makes you wonder if his claims were ever transferred to the company or not.
Posts: 5729 | From: Wisconsin | Registered: Sep 2003
| IP: Logged |
posted
gemm, ucad, sggm & uca are all down today. gemm was .19 two days ago at .09 now
Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Ahhh - gotcha. I have almost made the decision to throw some money at UCA.v and Sggm - just a little trigger shy. Being new to all of this, still learning and so far have not had a whole lot of luck - NT, TSBI to name a few.....looking at USCI though for kicks -
quote:Originally posted by bill1352: gemm, ucad, sggm & uca are all down today. gemm was .19 two days ago at .09 now
posted
i dont have any cash to play with but i'd hold up on anything with cmkx buddies for a day or so. gemm, ecpn are part of ucad and will be hurt by the forward split for a few days. ameritrade isn't adding uca-v to my streamer so i'm wondering if they will allow me to buy if i could
Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
if i was you and i'm not saying its a lock but i'd watch in the morning for any posts by dardadog. i've been watching him for a few months and if you act quick he does hit a good percent of the time. i owe the IRS $38,000 and if i dont make enough to pay it off before ameritrade sends out 1099's in Jan. they will close my account. so i'm just holding everything hoping 1 will hit it big by the first of the year
Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
