quote:

---

and if they come up with a VALUATION of this company which most likely will be higher than the claim of DeBeers

---

and:

quote:

---

and at worst chances cmkx only finds only as much as DeBeers.
do your DD on that.

---

and:

quote:

---

p.s. the o/s count will be most likely lower
and the value most likely higher

---

I'd be interested to know where I can find this information?

quote:

---

Originally posted by netsec:
Actually Will, go read the definition of a quote. What I copied from you was a quote. I did not include the rest of your sentence as the entire sentence followed a single path. To include the entire sentence would of been meaningless. You were trying to get across the point that you feel their investment is worthless. The rest of the sentence just tried to back up that point.

Thank you for trying to educate me on punctuation. Will, next time, please do not refer to me as pal. Thank you again.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by sarki316:
CMKX WILL BE AT .10 A SHARE BY THE END IF OCTOBER!!!!!!!

I KNOW THIS FOR A FACT. JUST GET READY TO CASH IN GUYS!!!!!!

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by sarki316:
CMKX WILL BE AT .10 A SHARE BY THE END IF OCTOBER!!!!!!!

I KNOW THIS FOR A FACT. JUST GET READY TO CASH IN GUYS!!!!!!

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by will:
Look, pal, I would try to explain it further to you, but if you didn't pay attention in the thirdgrade, you probably won't now. Any fair right minded person read my post correctly, I'm sure. I am also sure they saw you distortion, and quoting out of context.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by netsec:

It is funny the type of people you get on sites when they are free. Will, I have never insulted you, but you feel it is necessary to insult me to try and get your point across. Will I asked you very nicely not to call me pal, but you did anyway. Insulting my intelligence does not make you smarter by any stretch of the imagination. Will I consider myself a fair minder person. Please go back and read your own post before you try to lay blame somewhere else. Thank you.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Upside:
XchangeMODE,
I see so many people here griping that anyone with a negative opinion bases nothing on facts. That being the case, please lay out the facts that support these statements of yours:

I'd be interested to know where I can find this information?

---

TRY to find the map with the claims of sask.
look at it.
it`s easy to find.
cmkx has one on their site
that is
cmkm diamond
just in case you don`t
know
you can check
DeBeers canada..

AND for statistics on fort de la corne
check any mining website
northern miner ...

and so on

it`s pretty easy!

Will, I did read it properly. You implied that their investment, as it stands right now, is worthless. I am sorry if you cannot see this.

I dont know if you are just an angry person by nature Will and I am sorry if that is the case. The whole skeptic, foolish parargraph you put together isnt worth commenting on.

However, the last bit in your reply does merit a comment or two.

************************************
Now get your mouth shut, quiet yourself, and move on, pal. You insult yourself.
I am finished with you, reply if you like.
************************************

Allstocks, this goes out to you. Please go back and read the chain of replies in this thread. In this entire thread I have not once insulted Will. I am asking you to look at this as you are supposed to be the moderator(s) of this site. Freedom of speech allows me to disagree with someone, it does not however allow me to insult and be little someone. I read the post Bob added a few posts back. While it is nice to say you dont tell people what and what they cannot say, as moderators of this site you must step in when people cross the line. Unwarranted attacks by posters could lead to problems if, as a company, you do not step in and enforce some form of code of conduct. Will has provided us with a small example of the problem.

Thank you Will, even though you were unaware of helping me highlight a problem within Allstocks.

quote:

---

TRY to find the map with the claims of sask.
look at it.
it`s easy to find.
cmkx has one on their site
that is
cmkm diamond
just in case you don`t
know
you can check
DeBeers canada..

AND for statistics on fort de la corne
check any mining website
northern miner ...

and so on

it`s pretty easy!

---

That's your answer? I asked you to please lay out the facts to 3 statements you made:

#1, CMKX will have a higher valuation than DeBeers

#2, At worst, CMKX will only find the same amount as DeBeers (I'm assuming you mean diamonds)

#3, CMKX's o/s will most likley be lower than thought and their value will be higher.

I don't see your supporting facts in your response. Please help me out here.

Allstocks doesn't care. Read their prior response about people attacking each other.

quote:

---

Originally posted by skippy:
Netsec,

Allstocks doesn't care. Read their prior response about people attacking each other.

---

Hello Skippy,

quote:

---

Originally posted by skippy:
Netsec,

Allstocks doesn't care. Read their prior response about people attacking each other.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by skippy:
Will,

You have been here long enough as I have to know my post about Allstocks prior post was in reference to the attacking that went back and forth between several posters and got pretty petty and nasty. I was not talking to you or about you when I submitted my post. Neither do I appreciate you trying to link me to anyone that participated in all that BS. I don't like to see it from either direction and don't claim to have a dog in that fight.

---

Hello again Will, I am so glad you arent done with me yet. Will an attack can be verbal it does not have to involve a physical action. I can get a restraining order based on a verbal attack if the attack met the criteria necessary to get the order.

Will have I insulted your username sometime in the past that I am not aware of doing. If not please stop insulting mine. I am not comfortable with any attack made here on Allstocks.

I am just trying to clarify something now Will so help me out. When you say ilk, and you said it twice, what exactly are you implying. From the tone of your replies you seem to think I am some sort of pumper or something. If that is not the case I truly apologize. I am just trying make sure when people decide to post something like, worthless, they add an IMO or something to their post so that other readers will not assume the poster new something they didnt. Thats all.

I find it sad that youve had to insult me to try and get your point across. I am assuming we are both adults, it would be nice if you could treat me in the manner I am treating you at the moment. With respect and courtesy.

Thank you.

quote:

---

Originally posted by netsec:

It is funny the type of people you get on sites when they are free. Will, I have never insulted you, but you feel it is necessary to insult me to try and get your point across. Will I asked you very nicely not to call me pal, but you did anyway. Insulting my intelligence does not make you smarter by any stretch of the imagination. Will I consider myself a fair minder person. Please go back and read your own post before you try to lay blame somewhere else. Thank you.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by sarki316:
PENCIL OCT 21ST ON YOUR CALANDER. THAT IS WHEN CMKX WILL BE FULLY REPORTING FROM MY SOURCES.

THAT IS WHEN IT WILL MAKE IT'S MOVE.

---

quote:

---

Originally posted by Upside:
originally posted by XchangeMODE:
That's your answer? I asked you to please lay out the facts to 3 statements you made:

#1, CMKX will have a higher valuation than DeBeers

#2, At worst, CMKX will only find the same amount as DeBeers (I'm assuming you mean diamonds)

#3, CMKX's o/s will most likley be lower than thought and their value will be higher.

I don't see your supporting facts in your response. Please help me out here.

---

I DON`T GET PAID TO DO THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!

I`m pisssed i looked at USXP last night for no apparent reason .
i made money on it a year ago 100 or 200 %
in a day or two missed the p.r. today
200% on heavy volume.
grrrrrrrrrrrrrrr......

so don`t ask me any more questions
#1 i did not say cmkx will have a higher valuation than DEbeers.

DEBEERS DOESN`T TRADE ON ANY EXCHANGE

it was specific to the Fort de la Corne area

everybody here knows that cmkx has a multiple of the claims THAN DEBEERS in that area supposdly according to the areal survey
with lots of kimberlites
and according to canadian mining sites
80% contain diamonds
do i have to repeat what everybody here allready knows?
#2 these facts above would make it more likely
that cmkx finds more diamonds in sask.
than debeers
sask. is the biggest diamondfind in recent history in the world!

i said go to cmkm diamonds
www.casavantmining.com
------------------------
click on properties.
how hard could that be
look at the map!
go to debeers canada website you can google
it
great site
------------

i did my DD A LONG TIME AGO
I CAN`T REMEMBER ALL THE WeBSITES
BUT IT IS REALLY EASY
TO USE GOOGLE
TRY
FORT DE LA CORNE
DIAMOND MINING CANADA
AND SO ON ...
northern miner
you might come across a lot of information

but anybody with information about the drillsite
of debeers kimberlite body adjacent to cmkx
valued at 80 BILLION $
that information is easy to find too!

p.s.
I saw a MAP recently ,i don`t know where
that had a cmkx drilling next to DEBEERS
IT LOOKED LIKE THE SAME KIMBERLITE BODY
any clues anybody

sarki316
Member posted August 17, 2004 15:26
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Just when I posted yesterday CDVJ comes out with a PR.

Read the two sentences separately, like this:

"They went with like minded people who want to continue fooling themselves."

"When their invest is worthless, they still won't give up, they will try to convince themselves that they made a good decision."

Note: "fooling themselves" ends the first sentence.

Note: "When their invest is worthless" begins the next.

Now pay attention, the period ended the first sentence. When began a new sentence, thought. When, refered to if/when as in a future time. It was not intended to say or mean that it is presently worthless like you made it look.

Anyone reading the sentences properly can and will see the real intent.

If you cannot, or do not see the difference now I don't know whatelse to tell you.

You took me out of context, plain and simple.

Now if you're compelled, go get a restraining order.

quote:

---

Originally posted by netsec:
[QUOTE]Originally posted by will:
[B]That wasn't an attack, skippy. An attack is urinating on people, like one of your ilk did here.
I just defined foolish.
Oh yea! Wishing death on people is another tactic your ilk have used in the past.
Surely nutsac, netsec, whichever his name is can get comfortable with foolish after those attacks.

Hello again Will, I am so glad you arent done with me yet. Will an attack can be verbal it does not have to involve a physical action. I can get a restraining order based on a verbal attack if the attack met the criteria necessary to get the order.

Will have I insulted your username sometime in the past that I am not aware of doing. If not please stop insulting mine. I am not comfortable with any attack made here on Allstocks.

I am just trying to clarify something now Will so help me out. When you say ilk, and you said it twice, what exactly are you implying. From the tone of your replies you seem to think I am some sort of pumper or something. If that is not the case I truly apologize. I am just trying make sure when people decide to post something like, worthless, they add an IMO or something to their post so that other readers will not assume the poster new something they didnt. Thats all.

I find it sad that youve had to insult me to try and get your point across. I am assuming we are both adults, it would be nice if you could treat me in the manner I am treating you at the moment. With respect and courtesy.

Thank you.

---

I am glad you joined a conversation that you were not part of but felt you needed to add your own comments. I found it interesting that not only did you have to post but you had to post with an insult. Have I insulted you.

Running to mommy as you put it has somewhat of a negative conatation associated to it. I must again stress that Allstocks is providing a service. As a service provider they must police this service. If making sure they do police this service fairly to the benefit of all is considered running to mommy then Ill happily run to mommy.

Thank you Upside for again highlighting the issues with Allstocks.

quote:

---

Originally posted by Upside:
Better to just leave it alone Will. The guy's an obvious pansy looking to impress people. Like running to his mommy because someone insulted him. "Allstocks, Will insulted me! Make him stop!" Your time is better spent on things other than the likes of him.

---

quote:

---

Hello Upside,
I am glad you joined a conversation that you were not part of but felt you needed to add your own comments. I found it interesting that not only did you have to post but you had to post with an insult. Have I insulted you.

Running to mommy as you put it has somewhat of a negative conatation associated to it. I must again stress that Allstocks is providing a service. As a service provider they must police this service. If making sure they do police this service fairly to the benefit of all is considered running to mommy then Ill happily run to mommy.

Thank you Upside for again highlighting the issues with Allstocks.

---

Have you insulted me? Most definitely! Just reading your mindless drivel is insulting enough but then to watch you plead for help from Allstocks and accuse them of being unfair moderators is more than insulting, it's outrageous. They ARE allowing the banter to be fair by ignoring these foolish exchanges such as the one we're engaged in now. Someone ruffles your feathers a little, respond to them or ignore them, it's your choice but to go running to the mod's every time you feel insulted is ridiculous and yes, childish.