posted
Looked at the link you furnished. Couldn't tell quite what it was all about. Looked like some good doers society.
Posts: 4893 | From: Burbank IL USA | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Been busy all day. Taking a bit of a break so decided to check out this thread.
I saw that "colonel" thing too. Dismissed it as meaningless for our purposes. I saw another, where I think Dhonau was referred to as a Pfc.
No one wants to own up to sending me that CMKX T-Shirt and Chip? You folks going to make me check out all the profiles of posters on this thread so maybe I can check it against the post office stamp?
Took my chip to a casino and was told I could not gamble with it, but that they would give me 50,000 shs of CIM for it. LOL Declined their offer and told them the chip is worth more than that number of CIM shs. They raised it to 100K shs, so I DUMPED my CMKX chip!!
[This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited October 10, 2004).]
posted
"Pretty hard to find anything of value with NO MINES." ---------------------------
After having done VERY LITTLE DD, I found this very substantial information. Can it really be true that all these buyers are so naive as to keep waiting for real diamonds, or uranium, or whatever? Or, perhaps... could they be...paid pumpers? The reason I post here is because I'm truly sick of the brazen hawking going on at the races. It's bad for business. Really. Nothing worse than having ppl chase you down to forcibly hand you their wares. Free or not. Personally, I never would have bought into a diamond mine without having investigated at least a bit. Now, penny stocks / for what they're worth, maybe... but I'm too tight with my money. LOL
No Offense Intended, to Anyone.
[This message has been edited by lanebro (edited October 11, 2004).]
Posts: 81 | From: St Louis MO | Registered: Aug 2004
| IP: Logged |
I doubt that the thread is dying. Probably people away for the holiday.
tradingpennys,
Read your profile. I use to collect old pendulum clocks and fix them. Once had about 250...down to about 30 now. Sounds like we have a few similar interests, including collectibles.
[This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited October 11, 2004).]
I doubt that the thread is dying. Probably people away for the holiday.
tradingpennys,
Read your profile. I use to collect old pendulum clocks and fix them. Once had about 250...down to about 30 now. Sounds like we have a few similar interests, including collectibles.
[This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited October 11, 2004).]
I had intended to ask you what you collected since I had read on here that you were into trains. I have so much stuff I have aquired, I am sure we have alot in common.
You wrote: It can only go down one tick from .0002.
Any real good news it goes up ten clicks.
Also, some new info coming out shows a correction in the OS figures. Stay tuned. Don't count your basher chickens just yet. *************************************
Some time back I told you pumpers there is another step beyond .0001......BK.
Any real good news would be quite welcome. What happened to all the "past" good news put out by CMKX? Not so good, was it?
As to info on the OS, I will believe it when I see it and, then, only when it can be confirmed by a disinterested third party...not anyone with a vested interest in CMKX and grossly biased.
posted
BY now everybody should know there is something wrong with this picture here
I mean the PPS.
uranium and the price goes down ,instead of going up
i guess the problem is called NAKED SHORTING
OR would there be any other explanation?
there was this wild theory a couple of months ago to buy the cmkx related stocks (like ucad),because the MARKET MAKERS WILL HAVE TO BUY THOSE TO COVER
NOW SINCE THE BEGINNING OF OCTOBER HERE ARE THE RESULTS(LAST WEEK)
GEMM = UP 400% UCAD = UP 120% SGGM = UP 90%
CMKX = ???????????
what is going on ?
CMKX should have went up more tan the related companies
who`s shareholders are getting a dividend ucad`s? no cmkx!
have there been any news on jiuna mining (up 400 %)itself besides the relationship to cmkx. no! there only have been positive developments at cmkx i guess they have to cover at .0002 i`m shure they increased there short position on the day before the dividend , WHO POSSIBLY WOULD HAVE SOLD THAT DAY they must have pulled the shares out of cylinder hat.
posted
I Think this thread is dying where is everybody . maybe people are tired of nobody pulling up any interesting information on cmkx uranium claims? anybody?
actually i haven`t read anything interesting here lately a couple of people attacking each other irrelevant stuff
quote:Originally posted by XchangeMODE: BY now everybody should know there is something wrong with this picture here
I mean the PPS.
uranium and the price goes down ,instead of going up
i guess the problem is called NAKED SHORTING
OR would there be any other explanation?
there was this wild theory a couple of months ago to buy the cmkx related stocks (like ucad),because the MARKET MAKERS WILL HAVE TO BUY THOSE TO COVER
NOW SINCE THE BEGINNING OF OCTOBER HERE ARE THE RESULTS(LAST WEEK)
GEMM = UP 400% UCAD = UP 120% SGGM = UP 90%
CMKX = ???????????
what is going on ?
CMKX should have went up more tan the related companies
who`s shareholders are getting a dividend ucad`s? no cmkx!
have there been any news on jiuna mining (up 400 %)itself besides the relationship to cmkx. no! there only have been positive developments at cmkx i guess they have to cover at .0002 i`m shure they increased there short position on the day before the dividend , WHO POSSIBLY WOULD HAVE SOLD THAT DAY they must have pulled the shares out of cylinder hat.
no!
1. CMKX is diluting. Urban Casavant is a "creature of habit".
posted
The people attacking each other is an out right lie. Since the "other's" left it has been REALLY nice in here
quote:Originally posted by XchangeMODE: I Think this thread is dying where is everybody . maybe people are tired of nobody pulling up any interesting information on cmkx uranium claims? anybody?
actually i haven`t read anything interesting here lately a couple of people attacking each other irrelevant stuff
posted
dilution would have happened on a day the shares came to the market it didn`t happen that the price went down when people were talking about dilution the price went down recently dividend,uranium can you explain that. the trading before and after the 6th of oct.? what was that?
posted
look at the o/s of gemm & ucad. cmkx has 779 billion o/s say what you want but that is the number of shares that got the dividend and the same holds true for gemm. any person looking at cmkx without winning the lotto dreams clouding their vision has to know that it doesn't matter what they find or how much the pps will never give ppl the return too many have hyped. the dividends could end up costing more to sell then they will ever be worth. anyone not in a drugged like state from all the hype will see these things & sell. i still see a profit sometime in the future maybe even before the r/s from h**l that is coming. the cim dividned says 1.6 trillion but since it can't go from 779 billion to 1.6 trillion and then back to 779 billion something is going on and it hurts cmkx because ppl see a company that is not willing to be open & honest with its shareholders
Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by tradingpennys: The people attacking each other is an out right lie. Since the "other's" left it has been REALLY nice in here
Very sad...the "other's" you mention were here first and posted without fighting with each other. They just got tired of being continually bashed by "saviors", "newbie protectors", and "people with nothing better to do that pick fights with them".
quote:Very sad...the "other's" you mention were here first and posted without fighting with each other. They just got tired of being continually bashed by "saviors", "newbie protectors", and "people with nothing better to do that pick fights with them".
Sad.
I don't think it matters "who was here first", that makes it sound like little kids in a sandbox, but, if that's the criteria were using, I can say that myself, Will, WWJD, Glassman, and many others I'm forgetting have been here from the very beginning on thread # 1, started by everyones favorite heifer, CashCowMoo.
posted
THE 779 BILLION O/S IS BASED ON SOME BASIC DIVIDEND CALC. not proven until guilty . i asked why the price didn`t go down when the o/s dividend calc. of 779.b was figured out a while ago. WHY did the PPS GO DOWN AROUND THE 6TH, when nobody who has been holding would have sold???????????? same with the uranium claims???
and the increase in price sggm,ucad,GEMM Going up as we speak???????????????
that 779.b. o/s talk did start a while ago not last week !!!!!!!!
quote:Originally posted by Upside: originally posted by netsec: I don't think it matters "who was here first", that makes it sound like little kids in a sandbox, but, if that's the criteria were using, I can say that myself, Will, WWJD, Glassman, and many others I'm forgetting have been here from the very beginning on thread # 1, started by everyones favorite heifer, CashCowMoo.
Actually Upside your little connation of little kinds in a sandbox is a little naive. If you have 4 little kids arrive at a sandbox first and they all play nice together, they are willing to share the sandbox with anyone that comes along...you have a pretty nice sandbox. Lets just say then that those first few kids have to deal with a couple of new kids that bring baseball bats to the sandbox to beat up all the regular kids just so that they can have the sandbox to themselves. Sort of like kings of the sandbox. If you were one of the regular kids you would probably ask a parent to help control the problem of kids with baseball bats. And I do believe they tried, but the parent (Allstocks) in charge of the sandbox told the regular kids that the bullys were allowed to beat anyone up they wanted with their baseball bats. So the regular kids looked around at what they had and decided that their probably was a better sandbox around that allowed the kids to play together without fear of getting beaten with baseball bats by bullys looking to control the sandbox.
posted
It is so sad and disheartening for me to see cmkx be at .0001 -.0002 while gemm is 90%+. Seems like insiders planned a run on gemm, ucad to fatten their wallets even more at expense of cmkx.
Posts: 864 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
The "others" that left were mostly the "faithful". I might add the diehard faithful, who without a dubt are still painting a gingho rosey picture of CMKX elsewhere. They left because they didn't want to hear dissenting points of view. They are so insecure about the future of their investments they cannot stand one iota of reality. Hey, if I was in over my head with $15,000 to $25,000 + wrapped up in this ambiguous company I wouldn't want to hear anything negative, whether it was true or not, fact or fiction. They went with like minded people who want to continue fooling themselves. When their invest is worthless, they still won't give up, they will try to convince themselves that they made a good decision. If/when this thing ever see .0006 -.0009 they would be foolish to continue thinking it has a future beyond that.
Posts: 4893 | From: Burbank IL USA | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by will: The "others" that left were mostly the "faithful". I might add the diehard faithful, who without a dubt are still painting a gingho rosey picture of CMKX elsewhere. They left because they didn't want to hear dissenting points of view. They are so insecure about the future of their investments they cannot stand one iota of reality. Hey, if I was in over my head with $15,000 to $25,000 + wrapped up in this ambiguous company I wouldn't want to hear anything negative, whether it was true or not, fact or fiction. They went with like minded people who want to continue fooling themselves. When their invest is worthless, they still won't give up, they will try to convince themselves that they made a good decision. If/when this thing ever see .0006 -.0009 they would be foolish to continue thinking it has a future beyond that.
This is what I mean .... They went with like minded people who want to continue fooling themselves. When their invest is worthless....
Where is your proof, the hard cold facts, that say this stock is worthless. You dont even back that statment up with an IMO. Ive watch USCI go from .0001 to .0003 by just launching a website. Worth is all relative. Please dont issue your own opinions like theyve come from some sort of proven fact.
posted
Am I getting .00000000000001 worth? Where to sell is more then to own? Now, that make s me happy to see someone use my money to fatten themselves. Posts: 864 | Registered: Jun 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
Is what you quoted really what I said. No, you ignored the punctuation and made it sound like one thought. It said: "When their invest is worthless, they still won't give up, they will try to convince themselves that they made a good decision.", not, "They went with like minded people who want to continue fooling themselves. When their invest is worthless...." You twisted my post to make it conveient for you feeble arguement. I suggest you read it again paying close attention to the puncuation. Jesus! you can even distort black and white text. Read it again, pal.
quote:Originally posted by netsec: This is what I mean .... They went with like minded people who want to continue fooling themselves. When their invest is worthless....
Where is your proof, the hard cold facts, that say this stock is worthless. You dont even back that statment up with an IMO. Ive watch USCI go from .0001 to .0003 by just launching a website. Worth is all relative. Please dont issue your own opinions like theyve come from some sort of proven fact.
Like Ive said twice now, sad.
Posts: 4893 | From: Burbank IL USA | Registered: Feb 2004
| IP: Logged |
posted
WHY did the PPS GO DOWN AROUND THE 6TH, when nobody who has been holding would have sold???????????? same with the uranium claims??? and the increase in price sggm,ucad,GEMM Going up as we speak???????????????
that 779.b. o/s talk did start a while ago not last week !!!!!!!!
those were my questions!!!!!
DO I HAVE TO REPEAT MYSELF AGAIN.
===================================== the only part of gemm cmkx owns is the shares 25% worth as they did not excercise the option in the 2 month period that we know of. the 779 billion started when the otcbb report on the split came out. many thought it was false even to the point of trying to prove it was a hacker that posted it. as time went on it became more & more clear that this o/s was true. since cmkx would not confirm or deny this i'm guessing many ppl took the ucad & ran or bought gemm with the cmkx money they had left. they will use ucad to recover some losses when it becomes unrestricted. this is guess work but no matter how many times the zen's & dr. d's of cmkx say its ok or that figure is wrong and it will be proven so realistic ppl know better. 779 billion o/s kills the pps. ucad & gemm are companies with a good share structure and are honest & open with shareholders and in ucad's shares you get the biggest part of the cmkx diamond claims even more then cmkx. cmkx isn't a scam, its just grossly mismanaged.
quote:Originally posted by will: The "others" that left were mostly the "faithful". I might add the diehard faithful, who without a dubt are still painting a gingho rosey picture of CMKX elsewhere. They left because they didn't want to hear dissenting points of view. They are so insecure about the future of their investments they cannot stand one iota of reality. Hey, if I was in over my head with $15,000 to $25,000 + wrapped up in this ambiguous company I wouldn't want to hear anything negative, whether it was true or not, fact or fiction. They went with like minded people who want to continue fooling themselves. When their invest is worthless, they still won't give up, they will try to convince themselves that they made a good decision. If/when this thing ever see .0006 -.0009 they would be foolish to continue thinking it has a future beyond that.
YOU COULD PUT YOUR POCKET CHANGE ON THIS ONE
and if they come up with a VALUATION of this company which most likely will be higher than the claim of DeBeers it`s just a fat chance if you do your DD
AND if they come out with their o/s count which up to now is pure speculation
AGAIN That little DeBeers Mine next door VALUE 80 BILLION
and at worst chances cmkx only finds only as much as DeBeers. do your DD on that.
CMKX SO let`s take 800 billion O/S divided by value / 80 billion ________________
WOW !!!! 0.10 $$$$ CASHINK!!
I WOULD NEED SOME BIG POCKETS THEN
p.s. the o/s count will be most likely lower and the value most likely higher
in the meantime let`s wait and see but i have that feeling the day is near
the ucad ,gemm ,sggm increase seems to be the first signal so don`t be sad if you missed the bottom of lightly traded gemm but i guess that one will still go higher since we haven`t gotten the dividend yet(look at ucad) look at ucad intrinsic value i believe is 1$
in the meantime while posting on this relatively irrelevant thread i missed usxp gave me nice more than 100% daily profit last year but i guess it`s still one to watch BUT I RATHER WOULD LIKE WATCHING THIS ONE TAKE OFF !!
i didn`t pay much attention in the summer when the talk about the 800billion authorised shares came ,that resulted in a calculation of 779b. according to the dividend. supposely all this is temporary. i looked on the otccb and pinks could find a link about the 779b.
quote:Originally posted by will: Is what you quoted really what I said. No, you ignored the punctuation and made it sound like one thought. It said: "When their invest is worthless, they still won't give up, they will try to convince themselves that they made a good decision.", not, "They went with like minded people who want to continue fooling themselves. When their invest is worthless...." You twisted my post to make it conveient for you feeble arguement. I suggest you read it again paying close attention to the puncuation. Jesus! you can even distort black and white text. Read it again, pal.
Actually Will, go read the definition of a quote. What I copied from you was a quote. I did not include the rest of your sentence as the entire sentence followed a single path. To include the entire sentence would of been meaningless. You were trying to get across the point that you feel their investment is worthless. The rest of the sentence just tried to back up that point.
Thank you for trying to educate me on punctuation. Will, next time, please do not refer to me as pal. Thank you again.
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
