Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
Post New Topic  New Poll  
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
my profile login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board » Micro Penny Stocks, Penny Stocks $0.10 & Under » CMKX ... VII ...Waiting for that October Surpirse (Page 34)

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!   This topic comprises 56 pages: 1  2  3  ...  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  ...  54  55  56   
Author Topic: CMKX ... VII ...Waiting for that October Surpirse
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
i missed some of the fun here, that is if you call watching your money get flushed fun...lol had to listen to the qbid cc. at least they will tell ya how many shares, why not reporting.

==============================

no problem truth i thought i might be misreading it, that why i said that.

====================================

so now cmkx halted in canada too?? cool i wonder if our gemm shares dividends will be delayed...lol. i do feel for a few that left here that had put so much money into cmkx.

========================

wallace, i'd love to hear a few of the spins coming out also. as for getting political...lol my sister wont talk to me because i showed her the truth...lol she has lived in L.A. for the last 25 yrs. she'll get over it...lol


Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
joeyisthebest
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for joeyisthebest     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Folks don't this seem kind of weird Bad news for CMKX the day before the party!
I think something big is happening might be good might be bad I am holding just because of one person ROGER GLENN if he is a lier I am intending on sueing his firm and CMKX and USCA and all other participants. It would be stupid for all these companies to have invested with CMKX if they knew it was going to be a scam. JMO

Posts: 795 | From: Brown Deer, WI 53223 | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Upside
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Upside     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Hey Joe, good to see you back! Stick around. How many shirts have you got left?
Posts: 5729 | From: Wisconsin | Registered: Sep 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Highwaychild
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Highwaychild     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Did anyone get their 3 to 1 forward split shares before this happened?
I use Ameritrade and I didn't get mine yet.
Could this be what this is really all about?
Just seems like a ploy to me with the timming of this.


Posts: 2634 | From: The highway | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Esteban
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Esteban     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by joeyisthebest:
Folks don't this seem kind of weird Bad news for CMKX the day before the party!
I think something big is happening might be good might be bad I am holding just because of one person ROGER GLENN if he is a lier I am intending on sueing his firm and CMKX and USCA and all other participants. It would be stupid for all these companies to have invested with CMKX if they knew it was going to be a scam. JMO

Joey, Joey, Joey, its against all forms of decency for a non-attorney to sue a genuine attorney. It seems to me the only recourse is a thorough azz whuppin for all the directors and their attorney. We may have to repossess that silly looking hot rod too.
Steve


Posts: 259 | From: Rogers, AR | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Binky
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Binky     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by joeyisthebest:

It would be stupid for all these companies to have invested with CMKX if they knew it was going to be a scam. JMO

Seems like CMKM may be the deep pockets behind ALL these companies, BUT I may be wrong. CMKM investors may have put in all the money to get these other companies up and running in my opinion.

Quess we will soon find out.

JMHO

[This message has been edited by Binky (edited October 28, 2004).]


Posts: 75 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
TruthTeller
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for TruthTeller     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Joey..
I don't think there something big (possitive) happening, but I hope I am wrong. Just wishful thinking.

quote:
Originally posted by joeyisthebest:
Folks don't this seem kind of weird Bad news for CMKX the day before the party!
I think something big is happening might be good might be bad I am holding just because of one person ROGER GLENN if he is a lier I am intending on sueing his firm and CMKX and USCA and all other participants. It would be stupid for all these companies to have invested with CMKX if they knew it was going to be a scam. JMO


Posts: 264 | From: ATL | Registered: May 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Penny-Trader
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Penny-Trader     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
here is your October surprise

CMKX stopped trading in the province of Saskatchewan. What is going on?

Carol S. Remond :Canadian Regulators Halt CMKM From Stk Sales


By Carol S. Remond
A Dow Jones Newswires Column

NEW YORK (Dow Jones)--Canadian securities regulators in the province
of Saskatchewan have issued an order temporarily enjoining insiders of
CMKM Diamonds Inc. (CMKX) from selling the company stock to residents.

According to the order issued by the Saskatchewan Financial
Services Commission, Urban Casavant, David Desormeau and Melvin O'Neil
traded shares of CMKM Diamonds and its predecessor Casavant Mining
Kimberlite International, "when they were not registered pursuant to
section 27 of the Act."
The order also states that Casavant, Desormeau and O'Neil have,
"with the intention of effecting trades in the securities of (Casavant
Mining and CMKM) made statements which they know or ought reasonably
to know are misrepresentations."
The order expires Nov. 9. It's unclear how CMKM Diamonds and the
persons named will respond to the order.
CMKM president and large shareholder Casavant wasn't immediately
available for comment. O'Neil, CMKM Diamonds' spokesperson was also
unavailable. Desormeau is named as secretary and treasurer of Casavant
International Mining Corp. in the state of Nevada's corporate
database. Desormeau wasnt' immediately available for comment either.
Meanwhile, Roger Glenn, a lawyer representing CMKM Diamonds, didn't
return a telephone call seeking comment.
CMKM Diamonds has been the subject of three "In The Money" columns
which highlighted its huge daily trading volume and the lack of
information surrounding the company and its mineral claims. According
to the corporation department of the state of Nevada, there are
currently 800 billion shares of CMKM authorized.
Billions of CMKM shares trade daily but because it trades on the
unregulated Pink Sheets, the company doesn't have to provide any
financial information to its shareholders.
Although CMKM has declined to say just how many shares are
outstanding, a recent dividend payment related to U.S. Canadian
Minerals Inc. (USCA)'s acquisition of 5% of CMKM Diamonds' mineral
claims indicated that some 780 billion shares had been issued. CMKM
Diamonds shares were recently changing hands at about $0.0001, down
50% on the day.
Separately, the Securities and Exchange Commission suspended trading
in the shares of U.S. Canadian Minerals earlier Thursday. The SEC said
it took action because of questions regarding the accuracy of publicly
disseminated information regarding U.S. Canadian Minerals' financing
and mining activities and the value of its assets. The SEC said it has
been assisted in its inquiry into U.S. Canadian Minerals' public
statements by the NASD, the Saskatchewan Financial Services Commission
and the United Kingdom Financial Services Authority.
U.S. Canadian Minerals and CMKM Diamonds are holding a combined
party for their shareholders in Las Vegas this weekend.

(Carol S. Remond is an award-winning columnist and one of four who
write the "In The Money" feature. Most recently, she shared a 2003
Best of Business Award from the Society of Business Editors and
Writers for her role in Dow Jones' team coverage of the Canary Capital
mutual fund trading scandal.)

-By Carol S. Remond; Dow Jones Newswires; 201 938 2074;
carol.remond@dowjones.com


Posts: 4801 | From: Prescott, ON, Canada | Registered: May 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Penny-Trader
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Penny-Trader     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/suspensions/34-50599.htm

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C.
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
RELEASE NO. 50599 / October 28, 2004
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced the temporary suspension, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act"), of over-the-counter trading of the securities of U.S. Canadian Minerals Inc. (OTC Bulletin Board symbol “USCA”), of Las Vegas, Nevada. The suspension will commence at 9:30 a.m. EDT, October 28, 2004, through 11:59 p.m. EST, on November 10, 2004.

The Commission temporarily suspended trading in the securities of U.S. Canadian Minerals because of questions that have been raised about the accuracy of publicly disseminated information concerning, among other things, U.S. Canadian Minerals’ financing and mining activities and the value of U.S. Canadian Minerals’ purported assets.

The Commission cautions broker-dealers, shareholders, and prospective purchasers that they should carefully consider the foregoing information along with all other currently available information and any information subsequently issued by U.S. Canadian Minerals.

Further, brokers and dealers should be alert to the fact that, pursuant to Rule 15c2-11 under the Exchange Act, at the termination of the trading suspension, no quotation may be entered unless and until they have strictly complied with all of the provisions of the rule. If any broker or dealer has any questions as to whether or not he has complied with the rule, he should not enter any quotation but immediately contact the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission in Washington, D.C. If any broker or dealer is uncertain as to what is required by Rule 15c2-11, he should refrain from entering quotations relating to the securities of U.S. Canadian Minerals until such time as he has familiarized himself with the rule and is certain that all of its provisions have been met. If any broker or dealer enters any quotation for the stock of U.S. Canadian Minerals that is in violation of the rule, the Commission will consider the need for prompt enforcement action.

The Commission acknowledges the assistance of the National Association of Securities Dealers, the Saskatchewan Financial Services Commission, and the United Kingdom Financial Services Authority in this matter.

If any broker-dealer or other person has any information that may relate to this matter, call Michele Wein Layne of the Pacific Regional Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission at (323) 965-3850.


http://www.sec.gov/litigation/suspensions/34-50599.htm

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Home | Previous Page Modified: 10/28/2004


Posts: 4801 | From: Prescott, ON, Canada | Registered: May 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Penny-Trader
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Penny-Trader     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
CMKM's Casavant, DeSormeau and O'Neil suspended

2004-10-28 15:01 ET - Cease Trade Individual


The Saskatchewan Financial Services Commission has delegated to the director of the securities division the power to make orders pursuant to Section 134 of the Securities Act, 1988.

It has been represented to the director by the staff of the commission that:


Urban Armand Joseph Casavant, David DeSormeau, Casavant Mining Kimberlite International (CMKI), CMKM Diamonds Inc. (CMKM) and Melvin A. O'Neil (collectively the respondents) have traded in the securities of CMKI and CMKM in Saskatchewan;
the respondents traded in the securities of CMKI and CMKM when they were not registered pursuant to Section 27 of the act;
the respondents traded in the securities of CMKI and CMKM when no receipt had been issued pursuant to Section 58 of the act with respect to those securities;
the commission or director have not issued an order pursuant to Sections 83, 160 or any other provision of the act exempting the respondents and the securities of CMKI and CMKM from the registration and prospectus requirements of the act;
the respondents have, with the intention of effecting trades in the securities of CMKI and CMKM, made statements which they know or ought reasonably to know are misrepresentations, contrary to Subsection 44(3.1) of the act.

The director is of the opinion that it is in the public interest to make this order.

The director is of the opinion that the length of time required for a hearing would be prejudicial to the public interest.

The director hereby orders:


pursuant to Clause 134(1)(d) of the act that trading in all securities by and of the respondents cease forthwith up to and including Nov. 9, 2004; and
pursuant to Clause 134(1)(a) of the act, that the exemptions contained in Sections 38, 39, 39.1, 81, 82 and 102 of the act and the exemptions contained in the Securities Regulations, R.R.S., c. S-42.2 Reg 1, which provide for exemptions from the requirements of Sections 27, 58, 71 or 104 to 109 of the act, shall not apply forthwith up to and including Nov. 9, 2004, with respect to any trade in securities by the respondents.

This order may be extended for such period as the director considers necessary where sufficient information is not provided to the director on or before Nov. 9, 2004.

The commission will, at the request of any person or company named in this order, grant a hearing before the commission with respect to the within matter, such hearing to be held at such time and place as the commission shall determine.

The purpose of such hearing will be to consider whether it is in the public interest that a permanent cease trade order pursuant to Clause 134(1)(d) of the act and a permanent prohibition of statutory exemptions pursuant to Clause 134(1)(a) of the act be made with respect to the respondents by reason of the conduct herein before described and by reason of failing to provide the commission with satisfactory information on or before the date of the hearing or any extension thereof by the commission.

Any party to these proceedings may be represented by counsel of their choice at any such hearing before the commission.

Upon failure of any party to attend any such hearing at the time and place set therefore, the hearing may proceed in the absence of such party and such party is not entitled to any further notice of the proceedings therein.


Posts: 4801 | From: Prescott, ON, Canada | Registered: May 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Penny-Trader
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Penny-Trader     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
CMKM's Casavant, DeSormeau and O'Neil suspended

2004-10-28 15:01 ET - Cease Trade Individual


The Saskatchewan Financial Services Commission has delegated to the director of the securities division the power to make orders pursuant to Section 134 of the Securities Act, 1988.

It has been represented to the director by the staff of the commission that:


Urban Armand Joseph Casavant, David DeSormeau, Casavant Mining Kimberlite International (CMKI), CMKM Diamonds Inc. (CMKM) and Melvin A. O'Neil (collectively the respondents) have traded in the securities of CMKI and CMKM in Saskatchewan;
the respondents traded in the securities of CMKI and CMKM when they were not registered pursuant to Section 27 of the act;
the respondents traded in the securities of CMKI and CMKM when no receipt had been issued pursuant to Section 58 of the act with respect to those securities;
the commission or director have not issued an order pursuant to Sections 83, 160 or any other provision of the act exempting the respondents and the securities of CMKI and CMKM from the registration and prospectus requirements of the act;
the respondents have, with the intention of effecting trades in the securities of CMKI and CMKM, made statements which they know or ought reasonably to know are misrepresentations, contrary to Subsection 44(3.1) of the act.

The director is of the opinion that it is in the public interest to make this order.

The director is of the opinion that the length of time required for a hearing would be prejudicial to the public interest.

The director hereby orders:


pursuant to Clause 134(1)(d) of the act that trading in all securities by and of the respondents cease forthwith up to and including Nov. 9, 2004; and
pursuant to Clause 134(1)(a) of the act, that the exemptions contained in Sections 38, 39, 39.1, 81, 82 and 102 of the act and the exemptions contained in the Securities Regulations, R.R.S., c. S-42.2 Reg 1, which provide for exemptions from the requirements of Sections 27, 58, 71 or 104 to 109 of the act, shall not apply forthwith up to and including Nov. 9, 2004, with respect to any trade in securities by the respondents.

This order may be extended for such period as the director considers necessary where sufficient information is not provided to the director on or before Nov. 9, 2004.

The commission will, at the request of any person or company named in this order, grant a hearing before the commission with respect to the within matter, such hearing to be held at such time and place as the commission shall determine.

The purpose of such hearing will be to consider whether it is in the public interest that a permanent cease trade order pursuant to Clause 134(1)(d) of the act and a permanent prohibition of statutory exemptions pursuant to Clause 134(1)(a) of the act be made with respect to the respondents by reason of the conduct herein before described and by reason of failing to provide the commission with satisfactory information on or before the date of the hearing or any extension thereof by the commission.

Any party to these proceedings may be represented by counsel of their choice at any such hearing before the commission.

Upon failure of any party to attend any such hearing at the time and place set therefore, the hearing may proceed in the absence of such party and such party is not entitled to any further notice of the proceedings therein.


Posts: 4801 | From: Prescott, ON, Canada | Registered: May 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Penny-Trader
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Penny-Trader     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
http://www.sec.gov/news/digest/dig102804.txt
Posts: 4801 | From: Prescott, ON, Canada | Registered: May 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Penny-Trader
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Penny-Trader     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
http://www.sec.gov/rules/proposed/s71904/esmorris2019.htm
Posts: 4801 | From: Prescott, ON, Canada | Registered: May 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
RaiderJR
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for RaiderJR     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
It seems like someone is using a technicality in Canadian law to stop us.

The Canadian order is only for Canadian citizens.


The US investigation could involve many things. One bantied about is that the valuation of UCAD now excessively exceeds fair value based on numbers given to the SEC.


When this happens a stock is investigated. If the run up was caused by a NSS position then many will soon see the pen.

Like your local MM.


Other theories are the NSS did not cough up the split shares and it is being investigated.


Posts: 279 | From: Neodesha Ks USA | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Highwaychild
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Highwaychild     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I think USCA was about to make another run pretty quick.Then another divvy.IMHO
Seems it could be like scoring a basket on Shaq O'niel now.
Looks like somebody wasn't wanting to play a fair game.
Surely there was pockets deep enough to cover these share divvys.But how about a split and a run?A possible other split and run and so on?You might try to find a way around that if you could.Would you not?

Posts: 2634 | From: The highway | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
lbulbu
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for lbulbu     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
:

Got this off other board thought was interesting read.

[ I had not had anything to write about in a long time since this board pretty well takes care of it self.
Great job Mods btw.
I love reading the threads on this board many are well thought out.
George need I say more.
Nice to read Dr.D's theory on value of claims well thought out.
Nice to see all the old names from the old board here I wont mention any to scared I may leave too many out.
I really enjoy all your input and thoughts.
But I guess it's my turn for now.
First lets put out of our minds that this is a bad thing.
This time its a good thing.
I know that halts are generally bad but not in this case.
You dont have to look any further then nano signal and their CEO and his PR's and sueing Nite to know what's happening at this time.
The only way to get an accurate picture of the shorts is to completely halt trading on your stock and start counting.
This is being done as we speak here.
The MM's have turned on each other.
The truth will come out on this and CMKX.
Also a person cannot sell stock to another one.
You need a broker to sell your stock to 3rd person enough said about that.
You all have done your DD on this one why worry.
There's an old saying in my book.
Why worry about things you cant control you are not in control.
Why worry about things that you control you are in control of them.
Also,if USAC was that bad right now you wouldve seen CMKX drop like a rock to no bid.
But you didnt. Still a steady stream of buying on CMKX why ask yourself?
The MM's are no dummies but lets get this one thing straight now and forever.
They will cut each others throat when the time is right.
You may chuckle at this but at the same time your fellow board member would cut yours.
Why?Money!!
If I was to start telling you all when to sell you would double think your position.
Why is he telling us to sell at such and such price.
Theres also the subtle hints on this board already way too many if you ask me.
Threads like I should have sold at ..0010 or .0011 etc
I've also read threads that state that if and when it goes there again they will sell.
I was going to write earlier this week before all this came about.
The MM's have all of us for the moment.
Our frustation with no pps movement will cause lots of people to sell when this moves.
TOM PETTY "The waiting is the hardest part"
Lets get something straight here there is a huge nns position in our stock.
There has been threats made to certain people if they dont tow the line.
So,how do you get this message out there without any harm coming to anyone.
Prove it through another stock.
The DD you all have done doesnt change anything the fundmentals are there.
But to realize them is another thing.
Just relax for awhile spend the night out with your family and enjoy life.
Let Roger work this out and he will.
I believe 100% in this company and UC.
If I felt even an ounce of wrong doing I would tell you all.
I believe that UC and Roger together will starighten out this whole mess.
Also,the wolves are among us I know them well.
Writing is like one's own fingerprints it cannot be disguised.
To end this for now once again A GREAT JOB MODS all of you and a great job for all those who post here.
If you are lurking in the shadows reading please enjoy up and add your 2 cents to this board.
RM
these are my views and should be viewed as such

_________________
Do you believe, or do you just say you believe? http://www.xenobuzz.com/


Posts: 18 | From: Fargo ND 58102 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post 
These are the key statements in those official releases:
RE: UCAD

"questions that have been raised about the accuracy of publicly disseminated information concerning, among other things, U.S. Canadian Minerals’ financing and mining activities and the value of U.S. Canadian Minerals’ purported assets"

RE: CASAVANT, DeSORMEAU & O'NEIL

2. The Respondents traded in the securities of CMKI and CMKM when they were not
registered pursuant to section 27 of the Act;

3. The Respondents traded in the securities of CMKI and CMKM when no receipt had been
issued pursuant to section 58 of the Act with respect to those securities;

4. The Commission or Director has not issued an order pursuant to sections 83, 160 or any
other provision of the Act exempting the Respondents and the securities of CMKI and
CMKM from the registration and prospectus requirements of the Act;

5. The Respondents have, with the intention of effecting trades in the securities of CMKI
and CMKM, made statements which they know or ought reasonably to know are
misrepresentations, contrary to subsection 44(3.1) of the Act;

MY NOTE: In short, the contention is that they lied. No ifs, ands or buts about it.
Except that it may be their "butts".

THE DIRECTOR HEREBY ORDERS:
1. Pursuant to clause 134(1)(d) of the Act that trading in all securities by and of
The Respondents cease forthwith up to and including November 9, 2004

MY NOTE: This unequivocally states that UC, DeSormeau and Melvin cannot trade ANY SECURITIES AT ALL!! That means nowhere and no way. It would include CMKX as well as other securities they hold or control.

DATED at Regina, Saskatchewan on October 26, 2004.

MY NOTE: This information is current.

There is NO WAY this has anything to do with positive events or actions!



Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post 
Re ilbulbu's repost above, which states:

"Also a person cannot sell stock to another one.
You need a broker to sell your stock to 3rd person enough said about that."
***************************************

That is absolutely FALSE!!! Anyone can sell their stock to another without going through a broker. All it requires is turning the certificate (assuming one has the physical certificate) over and signing it on the reverse side. THAT IS FACT!!!

[This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited October 28, 2004).]


Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Doctoall
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Doctoall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
"Trick or Treat", I guess this is the October surprize. Have no choice but to wait it out

------------------
"If We Agree To Disagree, Then We Can Remain friends"

[This message has been edited by Doctoall (edited October 28, 2004).]


Posts: 4727 | From: Elk Grove ( Sacramento )CA USA | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post 
"Trick or Treat", I guess this is the October suprise. Have no choice but to wait it out
********************

There's one of those I won't mind telling "I told you so!!!".


Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Doctoall
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Doctoall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well thanks Wallace just after I was beginning to think that you were not a bad guy, just goes to show that you just never know.

------------------
"If We Agree To Disagree, Then We Can Remain friends"


Posts: 4727 | From: Elk Grove ( Sacramento )CA USA | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
tigertony
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for tigertony     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Did someone actually say this is still part of the plan,the master plan.That was a train that just hit you,Hello.Good Luck spin,spin,spin Keep Given them the facts Wallace
Posts: 942 | From: tracy,ca U.S.A | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Penny-Trader
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Penny-Trader     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
this will no doubt get spun around and say that this was Roger Glenns plans all along and it was supposed to happen to expose the great NSS

pump away boys pump away.

quote:
Originally posted by tigertony:
Did someone actually say this is still part of the plan,the master plan.That was a train that just hit you,Hello.Good Luck spin,spin,spin Keep Given them the facts Wallace

[This message has been edited by penny-trader (edited October 28, 2004).]


Posts: 4801 | From: Prescott, ON, Canada | Registered: May 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post 
Here's some basic info you might be interested in re the SEC's Rule 15c2-11:

"Rule 15c2-11 should not apply to debt securities because the fraud and manipu-lation that it was intended to prevent in the microcap equity and penny stock markets is simply not evident in the debt markets," she added. The Association's letter, signed by Starkweather, was written in response to the SEC's request for comments regarding whether Rule 15c2-11 should continue to apply to debt securities. That question was put to market participants in conjunction with the SEC's February proposal to heighten dealers' obligation with respect to the rule.

Currently, Rule 15c2-11 requires broker-dealers to obtain certain data about an is-suer before publishing price quotes related to the issuer's securities on any quotation me-dium besides a national securities exchange or NASDAQ. The rule is intended to discourage fraud and manipulation among equities issuers by establishing broker-dealers as a checkpoint to catch issuer misinformation. Under the SEC's proposed amendments to the rule, broker-dealers would not only be required to obtain such data, but to review and deliver it to anyone who requests it.

The SEC said the proposed amendments were prompted by "increasing incidents of fraud and manipulation in the over-the-counter securities market involving thinly-traded securities of thinly-capitalized issuers (i.e., microcap securities)."
*****************

The above is in reference to the SEC's actions toward UCAD. Since the Canadian authorities are suggesting misrepresentations on the part of the 3 stooges, might CMKX be next?


Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post 
"Well thanks Wallace"

You are welcome, since you certainly made every effort to earn it. JBCak was another one. There are others.


Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
skippy
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for skippy     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
What is significant about Nov.10th?

"U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C.
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
RELEASE NO. 50599 / October 28, 2004
The Securities and Exchange Commission announced the temporary suspension, pursuant to Section 12(k) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act"), of over-the-counter trading of the securities of U.S. Canadian Minerals Inc. (OTC Bulletin Board symbol “USCA”), of Las Vegas, Nevada. The suspension will commence at 9:30 a.m. EDT, October 28, 2004, through 11:59 p.m. EST, on NOVEMBER 10, 2004. "

and in Wallace's post about the Directors

"THE DIRECTOR HEREBY ORDERS:
1. Pursuant to clause 134(1)(d) of the Act that trading in all securities by and of
The Respondents cease forthwith up to and including November 9, 2004"

Why would they be restricted from trading now until/including November 9th? Is it o.k. for them to trade after November 9th?

Any ideas as to why the trading period has a definite ending date? If the company is under investigation why would they list an ending date? Or is it just common to have a suspension period of "x" days? Any thoughts?


Posts: 57 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Doctoall
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Doctoall     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Wallace, your kindness will no doubt be returned its just a shame that I will not be around to see it come back around. In any case its not over until the fat lady sings (no offense). So unless you are the fat lady singing, its not over

------------------
"If We Agree To Disagree, Then We Can Remain friends"


Posts: 4727 | From: Elk Grove ( Sacramento )CA USA | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post 
skippy,

I am not sure, but maybe those dates are the final dates upon which responses must be made for a hearing. If no response, might be a CEASE AND DESIST ORDER or worse. Just do not know.


Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
tigertony
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for tigertony     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Sarki as captain of a ship. Captain we have a leak, its ok.Captain the hull is taking on alot of water.Thats ok we drilled some holes on the other side to let it out.Captain were sinking it's ok you have to sink before you can swim.Captain she's going Blub,blub,gasp UNDER,Blub,gasp its ok shes gasp,blub,blub goo blub d as blub ne blub w.
quote:
Originally posted by sarki316:
What I am hearing is that CMKX and the SEC are finally getting the MM where they want them. I wouldn't get too nervious if CMKX or USCA(UCAD) get halted.

Roger Glenn who worked for the SEC knows exactly what he is doing. The basher will scare all of you guys but don't let them get too you.

CMKX PLAN IS UNFOLDING AS WE SPEAK!!!!!!!!

THERE IS NO WAY YOU CAN LOSE ON CMKX!!!!!! NO WAY. TRUST ME. @0.0001 THAT IS THE LOWEST A STOCK CAN BE AT. LOL!!!!!!

WALLACE I AM GETTING MY CIGAR READY!!!!!



Posts: 942 | From: tracy,ca U.S.A | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post 
tigertony,

LMAO!! Just a few rats, huh?

I also like noahlt's:

RATTLE, RATTLE, RATTLE


Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
skippy
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for skippy     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Did the SEC issue a statement months ago when they halted UCAD trading or was that just the canadian market? If so, where can I get a look at the last statement regarding the UCAD halt.

Thanks


Posts: 57 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Highwaychild
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Highwaychild     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Nope.I still say it was all about the
3 to 1 forward split divvy pay out day.
I should of had mine today but didn't.
So what's really going on here?


quote:
Originally posted by Wallace#1:
These are the key statements in those official releases:
RE: UCAD

"questions that have been raised about the accuracy of publicly disseminated information concerning, among other things, U.S. Canadian Minerals’ financing and mining activities and the value of U.S. Canadian Minerals’ purported assets"

RE: CASAVANT, DeSORMEAU & O'NEIL

2. The Respondents traded in the securities of CMKI and CMKM when they were not
registered pursuant to section 27 of the Act;

3. The Respondents traded in the securities of CMKI and CMKM when no receipt had been
issued pursuant to section 58 of the Act with respect to those securities;

4. The Commission or Director has not issued an order pursuant to sections 83, 160 or any
other provision of the Act exempting the Respondents and the securities of CMKI and
CMKM from the registration and prospectus requirements of the Act;

5. The Respondents have, with the intention of effecting trades in the securities of CMKI
and CMKM, made statements which they know or ought reasonably to know are
misrepresentations, contrary to subsection 44(3.1) of the Act;

MY NOTE: In short, the contention is that they lied. No ifs, ands or buts about it.
Except that it may be their "butts".

THE DIRECTOR HEREBY ORDERS:
1. Pursuant to clause 134(1)(d) of the Act that trading in all securities by and of
The Respondents cease forthwith up to and including November 9, 2004

MY NOTE: This unequivocally states that UC, DeSormeau and Melvin cannot trade ANY SECURITIES AT ALL!! That means nowhere and no way. It would include CMKX as well as other securities they hold or control.

DATED at Regina, Saskatchewan on October 26, 2004.

MY NOTE: This information is current.

There is NO WAY this has anything to do with positive events or actions!



Posts: 2634 | From: The highway | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
tigertony
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for tigertony     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Wallace, the scary part is i think he actually believes what he wrote.I feel bad for people if this keeps going this way.All i ever try to do is call it the way i see it.
Sarki just hits a nerve with his crazy predictions.Don't want him sucking others in.
I see the grim reaper at the door (IMHO) I hope i am wrong. Good Luck to all stuck in this mess.

Posts: 942 | From: tracy,ca U.S.A | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post 
skippy,

Not sure what release you are talking about. If it's about the one under discussion above, that is current.


Posts: 3607 | From: NJ - Outside Phila. | Registered: Mar 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
skippy
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for skippy     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I'm not referring to the release today. The one I want is from months ago when UCAD was halted until they released information about the sample results. The information they put out was completly different that the pr from CMKX at the time. I want to see that press release again.

I just can't remember if it was the SEC or the Canadian Gov. that put a halt to trading and issued a statement. I want to see the body of that release.


Posts: 57 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
  This topic comprises 56 pages: 1  2  3  ...  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  ...  54  55  56   

Post New Topic  New Poll  
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
Open Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Allstocks.com Message Board Home

© 1997 - 2021 Allstocks.com. All rights reserved.

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2

Share