posted
Glass...it's a message board...they can't "scream"...they can only type loudly...LOL
This is the craziest thing that I have ever seen... Am I being completely stupid in thinking that IF there was something wrong here the SEc would have stepped in? Good Lord YOU know the SEC has been notified by both the share holders and the Bashers!...The SEC would have to do something?!!
-------------------- #1 Rule: Protect your capital! #2 Rule: Never fall for the BS on the boards!
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by 10of13: Glass...it's a message board...they can't "scream"...they can only type loudly...LOL
This is the craziest thing that I have ever seen... Am I being completely stupid in thinking that IF there was something wrong here the SEc would have stepped in? Good Lord YOU know the SEC has been notified by both the share holders and the Bashers!...The SEC would have to do something?!!
haha, just be glad you don't HAVE to post there
the SEC? i am sure they have been notified... they are probably laughing at iHub too...
taking down names for future reference...
i bet there is a hedge fund hiding in the shorts with all the others...
i can't imagine anybody WANTING to post in all that mess..they must either be paid or crazy..
-------------------- Don't envy the happiness of those who live in a fool's paradise.
IP: Logged |
posted
The SEC doesn't do anything until it's too late. They wait it out until a situation is totally F'd up before they even straighten up in their chairs.
IP: Logged |
posted
yes, dollar, i thought serf was decent person 'til this thing went the way it did..he said he just stopped in over there one day, and never left??? wierd..
quote:Originally posted by JHenry: The SEC doesn't do anything until it's too late. They wait it out until a situation is totally F'd up before they even straighten up in their chairs.
true enough...
and? they don't need to take down names they are all logged... but it is kinda sad to see them over there acting, whatever you call that type of behaviour...
-------------------- Don't envy the happiness of those who live in a fool's paradise.
IP: Logged |
posted
Just got back from work and caught up on the reading Wow!!! This thing is crazy! I didn't think that was Mensah posting but if it was I'm glad He's gone. Guess it was him Bu bye! Oh and thanks for the patents! Luv ya!
-------------------- learnin as I go.
IP: Logged |
posted
Oh and by the way they are talking about making a movie on this whole thing (I'd imagine it won;t happen just joking about it but that would be fun) We need our boards caracters in it! Also they are talking about a cruise with CSHD holders (this accually might happen. Cruise or what ever it would be real cool to get together collectivly with the main boards if this works out and we all have a little extra cash on hand to take a little vacation to all get togather. I know I'll at least visit Georgia! I'm prolly 4 hours away. Just thinking if it does work out.
-------------------- learnin as I go.
IP: Logged |
posted
Glass some of this people there, they just going by the facts.
for example i post than "their is going to be a sec filing tomorrow" for any company ,a lot of investors are holding , but that pr never came ,so i think there is a lot of piss off investors waiting for that SEC filing on that day now "the investors are confuse" and they are going to start to asking a lot of questions(and some of them are holders too) "why ,when, blablabla " and some of the real longs might think they are bashed the STOCK
they want to know what to do with their money hold or sell .
Originally Posted by tutankhamen Shareholders let us get back to some serious and positive outlook on our company. Show the enemy that united we stand and we will let nothing sway us from victory. The 29th is fast approaching and before, or by then you will walking through the gates of victory. Everything you have been told has come to pass and there is no reason for doubt in any of your minds and that is why you are still "with". As you have been told the final blow will be one swift strike. Remember, the spit of the cobra blinds its victims first before the final victory strike.
This is only just the beginning Remember.
Those that stand before me will live. Those that stand with their backs to me will perish. The wings of the Phoenix will open soon enough and all will be revealed.
posted
is there any chance, any lil minutely peonic chance, that they could move to the Nasdaq and reallllly screw the shorts?
i mean, we'd have seen filings and stuff, rite?
you cant keep that kinda stuff secret, rite?
<ya KHabar befloos, bukrah yeb'a bebalash>
Literal translation: the costly news of today, will be free tomorrow. Hidden meaning: the secrets of today will, in time, be common knowledge. Applicability: when someone is going out of his way to find out about something.
posted
if they can prove they have the assets i think they'll be able to move...looking at the requirements...the folks with the big cash can go to NASDAQ if they so desire...they just have to show the cash...
speaking of the NASDAQ...ya'll know anything about the NASD...i may be a watchdog pretty soon...i still don't know it i can trade though...haven't discussed that yet...anyone know anything?
IP: Logged |
posted
but is it at all possible that they could come out with an announcement and say 'were all filed, and all set, and were moving to the nasdaq' and no one have any notice?
is there any way to keep something like that quiet til its announced?
ps- heah, ok dollar. ive never visited that country but i understand
IP: Logged |
posted
they very well could do that...I mean all we get is exactly what they want us to get...a perfect example of that is the Mensah business...he let some stuff go that they didn't want out...and look what happened...the people "behind" CSHD are making things happen...whether we see it or not is entirely up to them...
IP: Logged |
*********************** Originally Posted by tutankhamen Read the press release carefully. "To quickly and fairly resolve this issue by September 29, 2006, the last day of certificate exchange."
It has to be resolved "by" then for the certificate exchange.
It clearly states "by" and not "on" and if you remember Rufus stated numerous times the intention to do everything in one swift motion before the due date. "By" means "not later than or as is more commonly used to express "just immediately before or by". So in all reality it can happen at any moment because if you read the last few PR's and 8k's you will see that the NOBO list was the last thing needed. The strategy could be to totally blind the enemy before the final strike which would come as a total suprise to everyone. Minutes, hours, days? Take your pick. But when it hits you are either with or without.
quote:Originally posted by betting babe: eh, im almost with you, cept for a few details.
1 - AISS is a corporation. therefore the corp owns the rights to "the plan", and the corp had a joint partnership with CSHD
2 - AISS had no funding. so 3 of the 4 people wanted to swap their shares of AISS (worthless) for shares of CSHD (kerching). the 4th person wanted to be the CEO with the big paycheck and boss everyone else around - he wanted to be Rufus.
3 - mensah was jeopardizing the entire operation. compaigning to shareholders over labor day weekend while his own shareholders were clamoring for shares not in his company, but in the joint venture partner. listen to the phone calls that weekend - it is said loud & clear.
cuz CSHD has a heck of a lot more potential than AISS. so of course the AISS shareholders arent going to want to proceed wtih just a piece of the pie.
and i think Rufus was waiting to solve that issue before funding the JV.
now, the "other 3" shareholders of AISS are CSHD staff, holding CSHD stock... and #4 gets a load of number two.
joint = cooperation. sharing.
~BB
quote:Originally posted by dog: He saw big green coming... but wanted more, or perhaps needed it. For all we know Dr. Mensa may have been living large or signed agreements with other companies thru Georgia Aerospace and owed people some product or money.
If he's so damn great, why can't he get funding from pretty much everybody.
Answer: His intellectual property and patents are the property of CSHD.
The good Dr. states that he was promised money that was never delivered. Do you think he would have handed over his work and patents to somebody else to hold without having some cash in hand?
Doubt it. Dr. Mensah is bought and paid for. Here's the door.
Originally the plan was... we (CSHD) get a chunk of them (AISS), but they don't get any stock in CSHD.
Rufus hijacked them by stock swap... those that are left are now loyal to Rufus because they own shares of CSHD. No wonder they sacrificed Mensah. He shot himself in the foot.... he would have gotten a great deal. The board of directors FOLLOWED THE MONEY.
[ September 22, 2006, 00:55: Message edited by: dog ]
posted
Old Today, 01:00 AM #4065 RufusPaulHarris HSM Newbie
RufusPaulHarris's Avatar
Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Georgia Posts: 11
Try the following topics;
I have work to complete, I will respond to supported by facts post (SEC links, NASDAQ regulations, OTC regulations and Congressional supported laws or proposals …Docs…links…no media releases or Opinions supported by disclaimers (if the web site post a “this is our opinion you can not sue us disclaimer”, lets not waste our time to discuss their contents Please.).
Topic 1:
How can an OTC / NASDAQ Bulletin Board traded stock, Trade Pre-Market Open?
Topic 2:
How can a Brokerage Firm limit buying but not selling of their clients stock? Legally (Securities Laws not Brokerage Firm “You agreed to it when you signed up”)?
(Pre-discussion thought; If action is preformed in clients best interest, of Potential Fraud, Would allowing the client to sell, not be participating in the Potential Fraud by the client and the Broker? Legally that is?)
I will check back in a few!
I hope that all is well with you and your. __________________ GODSPEED Rufus Paul Harris Chief Executive Officer Conversion Solutions Holdings Corp Harris*cshd.us
-------------------- learnin as I go.
IP: Logged |
Join Date: Mar 2006 Location: Chicago Posts: 2,486
Quote: Originally Posted by RufusPaulHarris Try the following topics; Let's do it
I have work to complete, I will respond to supported by facts post (SEC links, NASDAQ regulations, OTC regulations and Congressional supported laws or proposals …Docs…links…no media releases or Opinions supported by disclaimers (if the web site post a “this is our opinion you can not sue us disclaimer”, lets not waste our time to discuss their contents Please.).
Topic 1:
How can an OTC / NASDAQ Bulletin Board traded stock, Trade Pre-Market Open?
Opening Cross The opening process generates a single price reflecting the true state of supply and demand for a particular stock at the start of each trading day. As a result, all investors, big or small, now enjoy a much more open and transparent flow of information and an enhanced set of execution choices - ultimately translating into greater fairness. This process also creates robust benchmark prices for index valuations and eliminates trade-or-move prior to market open, replacing it with a more efficient, pre-market trading session.
How does the Opening Cross work? The NASDAQ Opening Cross enables market participants to execute on-open interest in a robust price discovery facility. The new on-open order types are executable only during the Opening Cross. In the last two minutes leading up to the open, NASDAQ disseminates information about any order imbalance that exists among orders on the opening book along with an indicative opening price. In the opening process, the opening book and the NASDAQ Market Center continuous book are brought together to create a single NASDAQ Opening Cross, which occurs at 9:30 am, ET. NASDAQ opening prices are distributed to the consolidated tape immediately after the Opening Cross. Following the cross, regular market hours proceeds as usual.
Topic 2:
How can a Brokerage Firm limit buying but not selling of their clients stock? Legally (Securities Laws not Brokerage Firm “You agreed to it when you signed up”)?
(Pre-discussion thought; If action is preformed in clients best interest, of Potential Fraud, Would allowing the client to sell, not be participating in the Potential Fraud by the client and the Broker? Legally that is?)
Mandatory Close-Out Requirement for Threshold Securities –
Reg SHO will require each market center (e.g., NYSE, NASDAQ) to publish each settlement day a list of securities that have been failing to the CNS system operated by NSCC for a minimum amount over a defined period. (See the SEC’s release for the details of these requirements.) These securities are called “threshold securities.” Reg SHO requires that a broker-dealer who is failing for 13 consecutive settlement days in a threshold security close out its fail to deliver position by buying the securities in the market. If the broker-dealer cannot buy-in the securities (e.g., there are no offers in the name), the broker-dealer, and any broker for which it clears, is prohibited from accepting any additional short sale orders in that security unless it first borrows the security (or enters into a contract to borrow the securities) until the fail is cleaned up. If the broker is reasonably able to determine which of its account(s) contributed to the fail, it may impose this pre-borrow requirement only on the responsible account(s).
Soo... this brings up the question why Ameritrade is not letting us buy???
Is it because they're "protecting" us?
or is it because they can't short this stock anymore and are screwed?
I will check back in a few!
I hope that all is well with you and your.
I tried my best in blue __________________
-------------------- learnin as I go.
IP: Logged |
posted
so is rufus trying to say that the reset will happen in the 2 minutes before the opening bell based on information disseminated during the Opening Cross?
posted
I have a question, if anyone is still awake. The last part of the PR...."To quickly and fairly resolve this issue by September 29, 2006, the last day of certificate exchange." The last two words, "certificate exchange" what do you think he meant by this?