posted
i know better than to load up on this first bad day..im very hesitant to buy..i picked up 200 only at .77..I pay do this everytime the stock bounces off a low just buy 200 here 300 etc...
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by TaxBack04: Wally this stock is holding up more than pretty well. There are some amazingly large piles of chit being thrown at it.
Investors/traders are wising up to the chit thats being thrown at it lol.
IP: Logged |
posted
this is amazing. I think 99% of other otcbb stocks would've totally crashed with all that's happened here over the past 4-5 days. Yet we're still hanging in there pretty strongly.
quote:Originally posted by dog: I think the short squeeze is over-exaggerated, but still in play to some degree. We should see this go up, no?
I don't think it is over-exaggerated, I think it is just under studied. I don't know if anyone has enough knowledge of all the indicators of a short squeeze. I can say the lack of volume, the SHO list, and extreemly visible manipulation are all good indicators, but I may be talking out the side of my a$$ since I am forced to estimate what is happening inside the "black box" market maker's world.
I just don't think shorty gets trapped often enough for us to have detailed knowledge or experience of the "short squeeze" situation. I do think it is still in effect, atleast the volume does show me that someones hands are tied. They are not just making share out of thin air anymore.
posted
I'm one to flip most stocks and nothing will change my mind on that. I truly thought this would crash bigtime too, but Holy GotDam!!!
Its been ages since I've seen a stock with the resiliance to BS that this stock has. Can't believe I admit that. This thing has held up more than well to a hellish weekend.
-------------------- Rule 1: Always Protect Your Capital Rule 2: Earn slow, Don't lose fast
IP: Logged |
posted
I guess I was wrong. It took a week for it to dump down again, I said last Tues. it would be next day. Please dont spank me, mommy.
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by dog: I think the short squeeze is over-exaggerated, but still in play to some degree. We should see this go up, no?
I don't think it is over-exaggerated, I think it is just under studied. I don't know if anyone has enough knowledge of all the indicators of a short squeeze. I can say the lack of volume, the SHO list, and extreemly visible manipulation are all good indicators, but I may be talking out the side of my a$$ since I am forced to estimate what is happening inside the "black box" market maker's world.
I just don't think shorty gets trapped often enough for us to have detailed knowledge or experience of the "short squeeze" situation. I do think it is still in effect, atleast the volume does show me that someones hands are tied. They are not just making share out of thin air anymore.
Hope this POV helps. TB
True... it is shrouded in much mystery because we don't have access to the true numbers and data to undertake accurate analysis.
quote:Originally posted by Hustla: I'm one to flip most stocks and nothing will change my mind on that. I truly thought this would crash bigtime too, but Holy GotDam!!!
Its been ages since I've seen a stock with the resiliance to BS that this stock has. Can't believe I admit that. This thing has held up more than well to a hellish weekend.
I think more people are just so immune to this whole Ourstreet saga that it just does not affect them anymore
IP: Logged |
posted
I actually think that FAKE pr would have worked had the MM's been able to short. I think the SHO list might have just saved our a$$. It was only going to crash if everyone decided to sell. I think by holding through it. We prevented the fall. They had no more slips to short so the fall was halted before it really ever started.
Once again this is only specualation of the current manipulation. IMO
posted
I will say this is the first time in a couple of weeks that I have seen almost a million shares traded an hour into the day. Pretty high volume.
quote:Originally posted by usedtobeaCRab: jeese...this weekend has been something to behold huh, lol...friday at close kinda p*ssed me off so I stayed away...glad I did...
hey people...blackwater goes around the world...ya'll think Rufus would contract'm to pay a visit to slovenia, lol?
LMAO, hey I work with some good security people. And know ruthless others undderground.
Slovenia, LMAO
-------------------- Rule 1: Always Protect Your Capital Rule 2: Earn slow, Don't lose fast
IP: Logged |
posted
From: Humanitarian & Scientific World Fnd [mailto:info*hsworldfoundation.com] Sent: Tuesday, September 05, 2006 10:49 AM To: 'PP' Subject: RE: ???
Dear Sir or Madam:
Please be advised that the Foundation has disengaged with Conversion Solutions as of August 31, 2006 based on the appearance of potential fraud on the part CSHD. As we have had to endure the woes and ill intent of others who have brought us into their problems in the past, (please follow link: http://www.sos.mo.gov/securities/orders/AP-06-16.asp) we have no desire to do so in this matter. The Officers of Conversions Solutions did not follow protocol as agreed upon and as a result, it was our interpretation that they were attempting to defraud our organization. We have repeatedly requested explanations and clarifications from CSHD to no avail. That left us no other choice but to issue the Cease and Desist Order. Please be advised, however, that we do not know how Mr. Miles received this letter as it was deemed confidential.
Best regards
...and there was no name or signature or anything. just best regards.
very unprofessional looking.
very suspicious.
anyone could have registered this web address and could now be sending out email replies... has anyone verified that this is the actual organization?
From : Humanitarian & Scientific World Fnd <info*hsworldfoundation.com> Sent : Tuesday, September 5, 2006 10:45 AM To : Subject : RE: Our Street and Conversion solutions
Dear Mr. McDonald:
Please be advised that the Foundation has disengaged with Conversion Solutions as of August 31, 2006 based on the appearance of potential fraud on the part CSHD. As we have had to endure the woes and ill intent of others who have brought us into their problems in the past, (please follow link: http://www.sos.mo.gov/securities/orders/AP-06-16.asp) we have no desire to do so in this matter. The Officers of Conversions Solutions did not follow protocol as agreed upon and as a result, it was our interpretation that they were attempting to deceive our organization. We have repeatedly requested explanations and clarifications to no avail. That left us no other choice but to issue the Cease and Desist Order. Please be advised, however, that we do not know how Mr. Miles received this letter as it was deemed confidential.
Best regards
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Saturday, September 02, 2006 7:46 PM To: info*hsworldfoundation.com Subject: Our Street and Conversion solutions
Did you send a copy of a Cease and Desist order to Ourstreet.com and the NY Post on Friday 9/1/2006? If not was this document served upon conversion Solutions and do you still have a business relationship with them concerning
the bonds that have been mentioned in PR's. I am an investor in Conversion Solutions and would like to know the truth.
posted
What doesn't makes sense is the second email posted by O Street which seemd to imply everything was alright. I still have doubts. Also The whole Irrevocable Trust that can't be cancelled and I would think they would have a law firm issuing the C&D. Something still isn't right here.
posted
these are email REPLIES to emails received in the past few days.
i say the whole web address is a fake, and here is why:
wally asked about the C&D in his email. so the reply would be warranted.
me, i put subject: ???
and no body
NO BODY. NO QUESTION. NO REFERENCE TO THE C&D.
and, they didnt send back a bulk reply. they didnt accumulate our emails and then send a response. they sent each one individually, cuz the reply says:
subject: RE:???
so, why would a professional organization that gets tons of email to an info-at address, their only email address mind you, assume that ??? should warrant this reply?
answer: because that's the only reason it exists. to send that reply.