posted
just watched klucq through a bottom play very cool
-------------------- All post are my opinion. Do your own DD. Who's clicking your buy/sell button!? Posts: 7800 | From: Virginia | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Last live conference I was in on was with EDO, right after that they dumped big time. lol
-------------------- All post are my opinion. Do your own DD. Who's clicking your buy/sell button!? Posts: 7800 | From: Virginia | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
-------------------- All post are my opinion. Do your own DD. Who's clicking your buy/sell button!? Posts: 7800 | From: Virginia | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I agree, these 20% price increases really suck. I wish all this insider dumping/dilution would stop or we'll end up over our 20 DMA. I hate making money.
Posts: 3 | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
you'd think that there would be some kind of SEC regulation about filing a 144 and pumping within a certain time frame, but i guess not ! same as last month, a lot of fluff and no substance, only more shares to dump. same old story same old song and dance...
-------------------- I'm from Missouri - Show Me! Posts: 950 | From: Middle of Nowhere, Missouri | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by DeadPenny: I agree, these 20% price increases really suck. I wish all this insider dumping/dilution would stop or we'll end up over our 20 DMA. I hate making money.
lol..YES.. Me too...
-------------------- All my posts are based on my own opinions and not to be taken as buy/sell recommendations. Posts: 961 | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Purl Gurl: "You have failed to qualify your base comparison." Purl Gurl
The day I bought it, it was 0.305 and it was all time high andd LOD was 0.265.
-------------------- All my posts are based on my own opinions and not to be taken as buy/sell recommendations. Posts: 961 | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Purl Gurl: What is your opinion about this ongoing heavy insider selling? Purl Gurl
purl..did my "insider" sell show up on your L2
-------------------- All my posts are based on my own opinions and not to be taken as buy/sell recommendations. Posts: 961 | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Yes, a quarter cent, a half cent spread is pretty darn hard to work!
This tight spread is very telling of dilution.
My hope is our hundreds of lurkers here at Allstocks are learning a bit about scams.
Our markets need learned and aggressive traders who know how to avoid pump and dump scams and are willing to help others not lose money to these zillions of scams going on daily.
Purl Gurl
* my moniker is not allowed to be mentioned over at I-Hub.
quote:Originally posted by Purl Gurl: Well, maybe take an hour out late afternoon to skinny dip and sip champagne. Purl Gurl
yeah.. have some extra cash that i can use for weekend. is it friday yet???
-------------------- All my posts are based on my own opinions and not to be taken as buy/sell recommendations. Posts: 961 | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
Purl Gurl for a person who looks down so much upon twisting facts, as you do, your post about Magma Oil's proven oil reserves appear to be quite misleading . As of May 19955, Magma oil had total PROVEN reserves of 62 mmb. The most recent numbers I've come to find show that there were 82 mmb of PROVEN reserves as of 2004, which nearly matches the figure in your earlier post. However, you fail to relize that proven does not mean probable. The number of proven reserves today might be much greater than two years ago, given the aggressive exploration for oil because of the price runup. This and the fact that they may not even be referring to proven reserves, lead me to believe that the 137mmb estimate may very well be accurate.
Posts: 2 | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by CGI_SpitFire: Purl Gurl for a person who looks down so much upon twisting facts, as you do, your post about Magma Oil's proven oil reserves appear to be quite misleading . As of May 19955, Magma oil had total PROVEN reserves of 62 mmb. The most recent numbers I've come to find show that there were 82 mmb of PROVEN reserves as of 2004, which nearly matches the figure in your earlier post. However, you fail to relize that proven does not mean probable. The number of proven reserves today might be much greater than two years ago, given the aggressive exploration for oil because of the price runup. This and the fact that they may not even be referring to proven reserves, lead me to believe that the 137mmb estimate may very well be accurate.
Would you like one showing oil price runup as well? Or maybe an article covering how companies have been scrambling to search for oil?
Posts: 2 | Registered: Jun 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
So, Spitfart, you want to talk about serious contradictions in this 7 million barrels per year claimed by NDOL in news?
An alternative is Magma being valued less than NDOL paid. That might make a good topic.
However, if you are to make wild eyed claims based on very poor research, I will only humiliate you. Here at Allstocks we play it straight with readers. No pumping, no bashing, just the facts, Ma'am.
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
![[Big Grin]](biggrin.gif)
![[Razz]](tongue.gif)
