posted
bulliten board is better than pinks and that would mean a "higher exchange" as in better regarded transaction place where stocks can be "exchanged" from one hand to another for profits/losses Tex
-------------------- All my posts are based on my own opinions and not to be taken as buy/sell recommendations. Posts: 961 | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
hehe.. we know the drill Tex and you know the difference.. !not the first time you have tried to point it out to people.. ..
-------------------- All my posts are based on my own opinions and not to be taken as buy/sell recommendations. Posts: 961 | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
i hope noone posts a link from investopedia or SEC website about the difference between pinks, OTC, and other stock exchanges.. or are people already doign that? have to wait and see..
-------------------- All my posts are based on my own opinions and not to be taken as buy/sell recommendations. Posts: 961 | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Ragedbull777: I take it you don't hold NDOL. Am I correct in that assessment? If you don't why are you wasting the limited valuable time we are given on Earth on this board? Just curious? I am sure a savy investor like yourself must have a stock or two that is doing well for you. How come you aren't supporting those stocks. Again just curious.
I also feel that you may be depriving yourself of certain basic things in life. You sound like you may be a bit frustrated. There are many things one can do to release frustration. ****, be good to yourself and others as well. Enjoy life. Remember, you only live once.
Inquiring minds want to know.
FastEddie777
PS: You didn't happen to buy into NDOL at over $1, did you? That could explain a lot of things. If you did I wouldn't blame you for being mad at the company. Hell, I'd be bashing a bit myself.
And the award for Best Post To Begin The Summer goes to.......
Envelope please.......
FastEddie/RagedBull for his starring role in "Why Are You Here?"
By the way, FastEddie/RagedBull could not be here tonight to receive his award. We were trying to get him live via satellite, but experienced technical difficulties.
quote:Originally posted by Ragedbull777: I take it you don't hold NDOL. Am I correct in that assessment? If you don't why are you wasting the limited valuable time we are given on Earth on this board? Just curious? I am sure a savy investor like yourself must have a stock or two that is doing well for you. How come you aren't supporting those stocks. Again just curious.
I also feel that you may be depriving yourself of certain basic things in life. You sound like you may be a bit frustrated. There are many things one can do to release frustration. ****, be good to yourself and others as well. Enjoy life. Remember, you only live once.
Inquiring minds want to know.
FastEddie777
PS: You didn't happen to buy into NDOL at over $1, did you? That could explain a lot of things. If you did I wouldn't blame you for being mad at the company. Hell, I'd be bashing a bit myself.
And the award for Best Post To Begin The Summer goes to.......
Envelope please.......
FastEddie/RagedBull for his starring role in "Why Are You Here?"
By the way, FastEddie/RagedBull could not be here tonight to receive his award. We were trying to get him live via satellite, but experienced technical difficulties.
Can we mail this to him?
that's the same ridiculous argument you've been making, over and over...
any more of this, from you? after having been answered repeatedly? will consider it spam...
They are not claiming a current 7 million barrel per year production rate. The 7 million barrel/year is a future projection, not a current 2006 calendar year projection. “The company is expected to conclude the transaction over the next several months…” "Once the acquisition is completed, our company…will increase production to 7 million barrels per year…” So, they are saying that after the acquisition is completed in the next several months, the total output will increase to 7 million. The numbers are not inconsistent with existing projections: 2.5 million (Magma, number from your padded guestimate) .9 million (current NW) 3.68 million (NORD planned production for 2007 from nordoil.com) Total is a little over 7 million barrels. No one knows what the future production numbers will actually be; I’m just saying that the 7 million is not necessarily inconsistent with previously published info.
Also, as pointed out correctly by CGI_SpitFire, the Magma data you cited is from 2004. “The Study was presented by Magma … on 27 October 2004.” The 2004 study was not approved until May 2005, but the data in the study was still from 2004.
Posts: 4 | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
"Also, as pointed out correctly by CGI_SpitFire, the Magma data you cited is from 2004. “The Study was presented by Magma … on 27 October 2004.” The 2004 study was not approved until May 2005, but the data in the study was still from 2004."
Mule Manure. Magma dates this in May, 2005. This is the "image" presented to the public. This is current data. You are speculating, making excuses without a factual basis. Why so?
NDOL is claiming far more output than possible on known statistics. If Magma is capable of more, why has not NDOL released this information?
Based on my readings, Magma is maxed out on proven reserves. Their update was a minor increase suggesting they are unable to find more reserves. NDOL is claiming in excess of fifty-million barrels over known recent data.
How did those fifty-million barrels come about?
Again, why is NDOL not playing it straight with the public?
quote:Originally posted by Purl Gurl: "Also, as pointed out correctly by CGI_SpitFire, the Magma data you cited is from 2004. “The Study was presented by Magma … on 27 October 2004.” The 2004 study was not approved until May 2005, but the data in the study was still from 2004."
Mule Manure. Magma dates this in May, 2005. This is the "image" presented to the public. This is current data. You are speculating, making excuses without a factual basis. Why so?
NDOL is claiming far more output than possible on known statistics. If Magma is capable of more, why has not NDOL released this information?
Based on my readings, Magma is maxed out on proven reserves. Their update was a minor increase suggesting they are unable to find more reserves. NDOL is claiming in excess of fifty-million barrels over known recent data.
How did those fifty-million barrels come about?
Again, why is NDOL not playing it straight with the public?
Purl Gurl
Magma dates the news release May 2005. The news release dated 2005 clearly says the study was presented by Magma to CKR in 2004. The third party approved the study in 2005, but again, the study they approved is from 2004. Clearly worded in the press release.
Also, in your other response, I'm not contradicting myself. The actual production numbers are not known until after all of the barrels are counted and the year is done. I agree that NDOL should have a pretty good projection.
I'm done with these two topics, just wanted to point a few things out. So no matter how much you say I'm speculating, contradicting, making excuses, etc I won't respond.
Posts: 4 | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
"The news release dated 2005 clearly says the study was presented by Magma to CKR in 2004."
Yeah, so what? Where did those extra fifty-million barrels claimed by NDOL come from?
Well?
Some of you are missing so much, some of you are not thinking at all.
I could launch into an hour long write of NDOL history and their constant misleading readers.
Bottom line is this. NDOL assumes the public to be blithering idiots who believe these series of wild eyed pump news. NDOL believes all to be so stupid as to not verify statements.
NDOL believing the public to be idiots is exceptionally insulting.
You threaten to not respond to my articles. Clearly you mistake me for someone who cares.
posted
Here is an interesting tactic used by I-Hub pump and dump people, many of whom pump here. The I-Hub boys hope to keep readers from discovering NDOL insiders are dumping millions of shares on the markets, especially during the height of the pump, during high prices.
"Its BOGUS! Its not on EDGAR! its a faked 144"
This references a form 144 filed with and published by NASDAQ, yesterday, which is independently verifiable by anyone.
posted
I have previously provided a verifiable long list of NDOL insiders dumping shares on the market resulting in heavy dilution. This dumping of shares matches up with pump efforts.
Why are NDOL insiders dumping ten-million or so shares? Based on NDOL claims, based on pump and dump claims, why are they selling into the pump instead of waiting for the $2.17 per share priced promised by NDOL?
posted
they are dumping shares..they are dumping shares.. BOOOOOOOOOOOO.. they are dumping shares... dumping dumping dumping.... BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
-------------------- All my posts are based on my own opinions and not to be taken as buy/sell recommendations. Posts: 961 | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
lol purl gurl, do you have a typewriter hooked up on your pc? It automatically switches to a new line nowadays you are just so pathetic, desperately trying to prove NDOL/NWOG is just a P&D. really, don't you have anything better to do? get a life! who on earth would waste so much time on a stock they hate, geez (unless one earns from the pps going down)
btw, if they found 30 million extra barrels over a year ago, wouldn't it be possible they found another extra 50 proven... no of course not! also remember this is Russia, so not everything is 100% transparent also just read Credit Suisse could see the Gazprom share price tripple by next year, they are extremely positive on emerging market oil companies
Posts: 51 | From: Belgium | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
I don't know how to post a link or copy a page so i will have to type it out check it out,calculated oil for the siberian basin http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/FTPRTOOT/petroleum/0617.pdf look at page172 1997 US DOE MEMY
-------------------- The Chinese use the same symbol for disaster and opportunity. Posts: 211 | From: Haiku Maui | Registered: Feb 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
parkin figured out how to set up a swiss account huh? I wonder if Amyot is a co-contributor.
-------------------- All post are my opinion. Do your own DD. Who's clicking your buy/sell button!? Posts: 7800 | From: Virginia | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
posted
no telling with this IMO, too much play with the MMs and small buys trying to raise the price so they can get a bigger sell.
-------------------- All post are my opinion. Do your own DD. Who's clicking your buy/sell button!? Posts: 7800 | From: Virginia | Registered: May 2006
| IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Purl Gurl: I have previously provided a verifiable long list of NDOL insiders dumping shares on the market resulting in heavy dilution. This dumping of shares matches up with pump efforts.
Why are NDOL insiders dumping ten-million or so shares? Based on NDOL claims, based on pump and dump claims, why are they selling into the pump instead of waiting for the $2.17 per share priced promised by NDOL?
Purl Gurl
We know why Purl. Remember you've drilled us on why. We all have good memories. Tell us something new. If it will make you feel better we will all sell our shares and close this thread.
quote:Originally posted by camellio: lol purl gurl, do you have a typewriter hooked up on your pc? It automatically switches to a new line nowadays you are just so pathetic, desperately trying to prove NDOL/NWOG is just a P&D. really, don't you have anything better to do? get a life! who on earth would waste so much time on a stock they hate, geez (unless one earns from the pps going down)
btw, if they found 30 million extra barrels over a year ago, wouldn't it be possible they found another extra 50 proven... no of course not! also remember this is Russia, so not everything is 100% transparent also just read Credit Suisse could see the Gazprom share price tripple by next year, they are extremely positive on emerging market oil companies
i can answer that....
1)just so pathetic, desperately trying to prove NDOL/NWOG is just a P&D. really, don't you have anything better to do?
fairly good traders can afford to spend some time sharing what they've learned from other fairly good traders....
wanna know the sad part here?
most startups are P&D, they are going to the market to raise funds... only 1 in 100 is not doing the same thing NDOL is...
if NDOL intends to be at 2$ next year? they NEED to listen to the questions PG is asking...
if they intend to be at 2 CENTS next year? then thye should ignore PG and continue just the way they are....
if PG has "latched on" to this one? it seems to me the reason is the attitude of certian "promoters" that really increased the "attention factor"
2)also remember this is Russia, so not everything is 100% transparent
this part is what concerns me more than other problems.... i've talked about it a couple times, but i keep getting told it's not important.... now? you try to use it as if it's a GOOD THING?.......
whether you guys know it or not? there have been a few Russian Oil pinksheets that have been P&Ded in the last couple years...
if NDOL is gonna succeed? they need to set themselves aprt and above those other co's... no?
-------------------- Don't envy the happiness of those who live in a fool's paradise. Posts: 36378 | From: USA | Registered: Sep 2003
| IP: Logged |
The average total oil recovery efficiency, including potential improved recovery, from fields in the basin was 36.2 percent of the original oil in place."