posted June 24, 2004 17:43            

But, if UC is not doing what I think.

Perhaps some of us should.

Paul

quote:

---

Originally posted by TradingWizard:
My question is and this is not directly pertaining to CMKX, is it possible for the company traded on pink sheets to pay divident.
Paul I did not mean to interrupt your flow of thought. :-) but you gave me an idea to ask the above.

---

posted June 24, 2004 17:48            

quote:

---

Originally posted by TradingWizard:
My question is and this is not directly pertaining to CMKX, is it possible for the company traded on pink sheets to pay divident.
Paul I did not mean to interrupt your flow of thought. :-) but you gave me an idea to ask the above.

---

I think yes they can pay an dividend (pink sheets or not) but here my questions and I hope to receive an answer like this question can be very very important in my decision to buy again at 0.0001....WITH WHICH MONEY ?????......like they will have billions to pay if o/s is 500 Billions...
For the moment they have no income, a lot of expenses(drilling, car-race, expensive law firm to pay, mining material to buy or merger with mining companies so adios to take alone the benefit of coming findings....they have 2 partners for the moment with which they must share their upcoming..if any...income, drilling specialists to pay, right to protect, police to pay for protect their drilling zone...if they found something, employes to pay,trucks to buy etc etc etc etc etc

posted June 24, 2004 17:54            

quote:

---

Originally posted by richnessforeveryone:
I think yes they can pay an dividend (pink sheets or not) but here my questions and I hope to receive an answer like this question can be very very important in my decision to buy again at 0.0001....WITH WHICH MONEY ?????......like they will have billions to pay if o/s is 500 Billions...
For the moment they have no income, a lot of expenses(drilling, car-race, expensive law firm to pay, mining material to buy or merger with mining companies so adios to take alone the benefit of coming findings....they have 2 partners for the moment with which they must share their upcoming..if any...income, drilling specialists to pay, right to protect, police to pay for protect their drilling zone...if they found something, employes to pay,trucks to buy etc etc etc etc etc

[This message has been edited by richnessforeveryone (edited June 24, 2004).]

---

posted June 24, 2004 17:57            

richnessforeveryone you from Lux...are you near Husky Inj Molding company???

------------------
'Alone we can do so little; together we can do so much.' - Helen Keller

posted June 24, 2004 17:59            

quote:

---

Originally posted by cool1sh:
You never get it, do you?

---

posted June 24, 2004 18:02            

quote:

---

Originally posted by TradingWizard:
That is why companies go public, they need investors to invest in the company so they can acquire all necessary equipment or cover the expenses for the project. But also in the mining business you need to consider that it sometime takes time until the mining facility becomes profitable. Thats all I can say, may be others have more thoughts pertaining your question.

richnessforeveryone you from Lux...are you near Husky Inj Molding company???

---

Thx Trading.....
Yes I'm from Luxbg.........what is Husky Inj molding company....I don't know them..

posted June 24, 2004 18:37            

quote:

---

Originally posted by ludinlo:
Need some help here. My advisor tells me to get out of CMKX but I just want to wait to see if they come out with a PR.

Any suggestions, please be honest

---

why do you need an advisor to trade sub-penny stocks?

posted June 24, 2004 20:11            

CMKM SHARE CERTIFICATE DEMAND DELIVERY - IMMEDIATELY!!!
TO ALL LONGS - Asked to have the CMKM
- curried to to You a.s.a.p.!!!

JGDiefenbaker, agree there's a huge likelihood that we
will see a massive CMKX short-squeeze.

When the FBI goes in:
How do you suggest the bankster brokers will cover unlawful short
positions in the trillions of non-existant shares,
when no one is selling?

The bank/sters selling the same house 1000 times
and try to kill off the buyers
,,,before the buyers take possession?

,,,buyers should all ask for their
share certificates!!!

The CMKM to make an audit, the lawfirm will demand it!!!

bank/ster brokers will go "broke & jail" 100yrs.
if i be the judge!!!

,,and all the bashing pawn broker/partners should go to jail,,imo.

Share your suspicion with the FBI and
the naked shorting terrorists
will soon be history.

The more complaints filed with FBI,
CIA, FTC, SEC. COM. etc. the more the better.

https://tips.fbi.gov/
http://www.ftc.gov ->Click file a complaint
http://www.sec.gov/complaint/selectconduct.shtml

File your complaint, the sooner the better!
IMO Thx
Posted By: BUDDIEBuddie

JOIN ~ Companies' Rights Coalition
http://ivarkreuger.proboards32.com/index.cgi?board=Coalition&action=display&num=1087975012

Smallcap the naked short termites first target -
larger blue stocks second in line,,,

SAVE THE WORLD - short squeeeze bank/sters to 100%

Would not sell anything bellow a BUCK

NASDAQ OTC Bullertin Board Information Centre

[IMG]CMKM DIAMONDS INC: CMKX

WHY DIAMONDS IN SASKATCHEWAN ?

- One of the largest known kimberlite clusters in the world.

- 130 of the 2000 kimberlite pipes known worldwide
are macro-diamond bearing. 23 of these are located
in the Fort a la Corne district of Saskatchewan.

- 80% of Saskatchewans' kimberlite pipes are diamondiferous.

- 50% contain diamonds over one millimeter in size.

- A high percentage of diamonds recovered are clear,
inclusion-free and exhibit good crystal form.

- Pipes said to have erupted under inland sea and
therefore have not been exposed to weathering
or glaciation.

- Pipes lie within 300 feet of surface.

- Area accessible by paved all-weather road,
with water and power readily available.

- Studies indicate cash operating costs of $10.50 per tonne,
including overburden removal.

- Saskatchewan government encourages mining in the province.[/B]

http://www.otcbb.com/help/cms_includes/quote_module.htm

http://investorshub.com/boards/board.asp?board_id=1561

Further developments and other information
on the company may be viewed at our website,
http://www.casavantmining.com..

SAVE THE WESTERN WORLD - short squeeeze bank/sters to 100%

“The new rules expand the scope of the affirmative determination requirements to include orders received from broker/dealers that are not members of NASD ("non-member broker/dealers").

The new rule is on the web at http://www.nasdr.com/2610_2004.asp#04-03

The rule itself, while welcomed by small companies and their shareholders in the U.S., nevertheless raised an outcry because the NASD’s request to put it into effect!

The illegal naked shortselling fraud banksters broker's
hedge funds dictate the market for the moment and what
all should do is to make the complains to FBI, CIA to
US wipe out the pesky termites bokers pawns are
all over and bashing down all good stocks,
only promo. the banksters nt, enron, wcom, bgo, abx,
bre-x copycats, imo!!!!
Pass it along>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Thanks for info,,,

Tell us about your complaint
Please select the type of conduct that best describes your complaint:

Problems with buy or sell orders

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Problems with my brokerage firm or broker

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Manipulation of security price or volume

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Fraudulent or unregistered offer or sale of securities

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Financial privacy complaint

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cold calling

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Problems with my investment adviser or financial planner

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Problems with my mutual fund

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Problems with 401(k), pension or retirement

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Problems with IPO allocation or eligibility

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Failure to file required reports with the SEC

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

False or misleading statements about a company (including false or misleading SEC reports or financial statements)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Fraud in the marketing of a securities trading course, program or similar product

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Other

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.sec.gov/complaint/selectconduct.shtml

I chose this one: Fraudulent or unregistered offer or sale of securities http://www.sec.gov/complaint/cf942sec9570.htm

pls get rid of the naked shortselling banksters, I don't want bankster competition imho

-------------------------------------------------------------------
shorts,,,prepare for jail,,,
and prepare to lose any lic. u hold!!!

While the FBI continues to encourage the public to submit information regarding the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, this form may also be used to report any suspected criminal activity to the FBI.

Share your suspicion with the FBI and the naked shorting terrorists will soon be history.

The more complaints filed with FBI SEC FTC etc the better.

https://tips.fbi.gov/
http://www.ftc.gov ->Click file a complaint
http://www.sec.gov/complaint/selectconduct.shtml

File your complaint, the sooner the better!
IMO Thx
Posted by: RRothschild (ID#: 469234)
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,

shorts,,,prepare for jail,,,
and prepare to lose any lic. u hold!!!
While the FBI continues to encourage the public to submit information regarding the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, this form may also be used to report any suspected criminal activity to the FBI.

Share your suspicion with the FBI and the naked shorting terrorists will soon be history.

The more complaints filed with FBI SEC FTC etc the better.

https://tips.fbi.gov/
http://www.ftc.gov ->Click file a complaint
http://www.sec.gov/complaint/selectconduct.shtml

posted June 24, 2004 20:16            

Have anyone heard of this.

posted June 24, 2004 20:33            

quote:

---

I was reading some post on CMKX RB boards. There were talks on phone calls made to the new transfer agent in which they, new tranfer agents, mentioned that the were only 965 shareholders.
Have anyone heard of this.

The post were around 3pm EST. I will try to located some of them and post them here.

---

prdponce,
That sounds like a fairly high figure to me. We should put this issue to rest before it becomes the latest "pump". Shareholders who actually have possession of their shares, ie: the certificates, are counted as one shareholder. This could be you, me, your kids, corporations, anyone who actually possesses their shares. I own stock in the company but I do not have physical possession of my certificates. They are held in what's called "street name" at Ameritrade who is my broker. Most people elect to have their broker keep their shares in street name. What that means is that Ameritrade, E-Trade, Waterhouse, etc. all own shares on behalf of their clients. They are each counted as one shareholder. Ameritrade could have 10 billion shares held for their customers and they would still be counted as one shareholder. Very few people, or corporations for that matter, actually take physical possession of their certificates.

posted June 24, 2004 20:42            

Thanks for the explanation. I just did not know what to make of it.

Like you said, it is probably better to leave like that and just wait for the PR.

posted June 24, 2004 21:22            

[This message has been edited by VNGNTN1 (edited June 24, 2004).]

posted June 24, 2004 21:23            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Upside:
Van,
I haven't either but I'll be upset if they're public record. As far as the brokers report, that one I can answer. If you and I have an account at XYZ brokerage house and we both buy shares in CMKX and elect to have them hold the certificates, we are reported as one shareholder under the name of XYZ. If there are two others who also bought shares through XYZ and requested the certificates, they are reported as two shareholders. So XYZ's report to the new transfer agent would be 2 shareholders holding xxx shares in certificate form, and XYZ corporation (representing the two of us) holding xxx shares.

---

posted June 24, 2004 21:32            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Upside:
Will,
Read 11 posts up from your last one.

---

posted June 24, 2004 22:35            

Further the Board has notified the present Transfer Agent, 1st Global Stock Transfer to do a full and complete audit of the company and/or will have an independent auditor audit the company and as soon as that audit is complete the Company has retained Pacific Stock Transfer, Inc., to become the new Transfer Agent for CMKM Diamonds, Inc.

Is the audit done? Is that tomorrows PR?

[This message has been edited by will (edited June 24, 2004).]

posted June 24, 2004 22:46            

June 24, 2004

LAS VEGAS, Jun 24, 2004 (BUSINESS WIRE) --

CMKM Diamonds, Inc. (Pink Sheets:CMKX) announced today it has just received preliminary results from the airborne magnetic survey recently completed by Goldak Airborne Surveys of Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. The survey was conducted during April, May and June 2004 using Goldak's Navaho aircraft equipped with a trimaxial magnetic gradiometer.

By employing this modern, state of the art geophysical equipment and flying a low-level, closely spaced survey, hundreds of magnetic anomalies were able to be identified. Some of these anomalies are obvious drill targets, while others will need further study by the Company's consultants.

Urban Casavant, president of the CMKM Diamonds, Inc., stated, "The company is very pleased with the results of the survey. For the first time in the history of diamond exploration in the Fort a' la Corne area, a complete and comprehensive magnetic picture of the whole area is available to the company."

The company intends to immediately pursue the most obvious targets by drill testing as soon as permitting and logistics allow. There are now more than enough targets to allow CMKX to drill continuously. On a final note, Urban Casavant stated, "These hundreds of anomalies have been filtered for elimination of farm equipment and steel buildings as a probable cause for such an impressive count of anomalies."

Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: The statements, other than the statements of historical facts, contained in this release which are not historical facts, may be deemed to contain forward-looking statements with respect to events, the occurrence of which involves risk and uncertainties, including, without limitation, demand and competition for the company's products and services, the availability to the company of adequate financing to support its anticipated activities, the ability of the company to generate cash flow from operations and the ability of the company to manage its operations.

posted June 24, 2004 22:49            

It is just a matter of time.

posted June 24, 2004 22:54            

CMKM Diamonds, Inc. Announces Preliminary Results from Goldak Airborne Magnetic Survey of Saskatoon, Saskatchewan
6/24/2004 10:39:00 PM

LAS VEGAS, Jun 24, 2004 (BUSINESS WIRE) -- CMKM Diamonds, Inc. (Pink Sheets:CMKX) announced today it has just received preliminary results from the airborne magnetic survey recently completed by Goldak Airborne Surveys of Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. The survey was conducted during April, May and June 2004 using Goldak's Navaho aircraft equipped with a trimaxial magnetic gradiometer.

By employing this modern, state of the art geophysical equipment and flying a low-level, closely spaced survey, hundreds of magnetic anomalies were able to be identified. Some of these anomalies are obvious drill targets, while others will need further study by the Company's consultants.

Urban Casavant, president of the CMKM Diamonds, Inc., stated, "The company is very pleased with the results of the survey. For the first time in the history of diamond exploration in the Fort a' la Corne area, a complete and comprehensive magnetic picture of the whole area is available to the company."

The company intends to immediately pursue the most obvious targets by drill testing as soon as permitting and logistics allow. There are now more than enough targets to allow CMKX to drill continuously. On a final note, Urban Casavant stated, "These hundreds of anomalies have been filtered for elimination of farm equipment and steel buildings as a probable cause for such an impressive count of anomalies."

Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: The statements, other than the statements of historical facts, contained in this release which are not historical facts, may be deemed to contain forward-looking statements with respect to events, the occurrence of which involves risk and uncertainties, including, without limitation, demand and competition for the company's products and services, the availability to the company of adequate financing to support its anticipated activities, the ability of the company to generate cash flow from operations and the ability of the company to manage its operations.

SOURCE: CMKM Diamonds, Inc.

posted June 24, 2004 23:04            

Those of you who do not know, the basic tenents of determining a good stock from a bad one are the same no matter where it is traded...NYSE, Amex, Nasdaq, OTCBB and OTCPK.
Only the mechanics differ...by that I mean how it is traded and where that information is found. That does not make someone a "newbie", just a "bit" unfamiliar with mechanics.

Granted, I got carried away by the insults and attacks by certain parties (most of whom are still posting here)...and I retorted in like kind. That, I will try to avoid. Someone opened a post for contrary opinions and they and others got batterd as well...and by the very same individuals on this thread.

Going back to a post by klempar77 on p.48, 6/24/04 at 9:03, there wasn't one thing said that was misleading or incorrect...and it does not matter about Bernstein's past. That admitted past does not make him wrong! I am sure even some of you have a past of which you are not 100% proud. Basically, he said the same thing I had been saying except in many more words.

Now with reference to shareholder count. Some of you might remember that I had suggested you demand your shares physically in certificate form to put a halt to all the incessant references to naked short trading. At that time I explained how shares were held..."street name". There seems to be some confusion still as to how they are counted. If all your shares (WWJD's,Upside's,Doji's, everyone else"s) were held by one broker (let's say Ameritrade) the transfer agent would count them as X number of shares held by 1 shareholder. If, instead, everyone else (other than WWJD, Upside and Doji) had their shares with another broker (let's say Scottrade), that would account for 2 shareholders with the transfer agent. Now, and assuming the foregoing still exists, but that I have 4 mil shares in physical certificate form and osubucks has 10 mil in certificate form that would mean that there are 2 more shareholders ("of record" with the transfer agent) adding up to a total of 4 shareholders. For you information, it is entirely possible for the company to request and get an accurate count of the total number of shareholders where they are held in "street name" and otherwise counted as 1 shareholder for each broker.

Now, another matter. I keep seeing references to UC's statement that he, they or the company has/have "retired" shares to the "Treasury". In fact, UC made exactly such a release about some 16.5+ mil shares.
The words "retired" and "Treasury" are contradictory when it comes to a company's Treasury shares on a balance sheet. All those shares were once "issued and outstanding" shares to begin with. If any (any at all) go into "Treasury", they still remain "issued"...just not outstanding. A company may do anything they like with those shares (and without your knowing what) since they are already issued. I cannot say that I have ever seen any company actually retire common shares that they have repurchased, but I suppose it is possible. It would, however, be strange and I do not know how they would account for it on a balance sheet.

Now to the NYC law firm - Edwards & Angell.
There are many, many Wall St. law firms that deal in securities matters, and (hopefully you will not think I am bragging) I have dealt with most of them in the past. To claim that a firm with 44 lawyers and only 1 of whom is qualified in securities matters, says very little. Those I dealt with had many senior partners, partners, and associates...all of whom specialized in securities matters. In short, having only 1 so-called securities specialist is not the least bit impressive. For example, just search Cravath, Swaine & Moore (the name may have changed but just the word Cravath should kick out the info) and you should see a major difference. Another was Millbank Tweed. Another was Nixon, Mudge, Rose, Guthrie and Alexander - Richard Nixon's old firm but Nixon's name had been deleted when I dealt with them. There were at least 20 other such firms I worked with on a daily basis.

With reference to UC and Melvin, making statements. The law is specific on these matters. If all these statements attributed to either UC or Melvin are true, they may be breaking the law. Let's say, Melvin or UC said to me, "What we are going to be announcing will be like a Mt.St.Helens eruption!". They are both "insiders" of CMKX. I am not. I go and trade on the basis of that information which is not "officially publically" released to everyone. Both they and I would then have broken the securities laws and would be subject to prosecution.

Now, there's one last thing I will ask of you. If someone has an opposing view (myself, Oil Man, Timberman, Osubucks, richnessforeveryone, and others), at least listen to it without beating up on them, going on a witch hunt or crawling off to hide on another thread. Speak up for their rights as well as your own. That is what this country (and christianity) is all about.

posted June 24, 2004 23:10            

I do not know if the audit is done. I do THINK it is.

I spoke w/ Melvin right after they announced that the audit was ordered. I left that conversation thinking that it would take about a week to complete.

I think the results have been in a while and they are holding it OR the old TA or whoever was not complying and had to be forced to o te audit by the new lawyer.

Ither way, I think the audit is done. In one way I hope the pr comes tomorrow giving all the information. In another way, I hope it hits .0001 again before it realy does its thing. I would love another opportunity to buy in at .0001 before the run.

I really do think it is just a matter of time.

We will see....

PAUL

quote:

---

Originally posted by will:
There is one thing I find curious. The fellow who talked to the tranfer agent to get the number of shares holders mentioned it. He said the agent told him that they were not directed to an audit yet. Anyone else find that curious, I thought the audit was mentioned in a PR alng with the change of agents. Seems direction to begin an audit should have been given already. The obvious answer is that will come, but.........
FROM THE JUNE 3, PR:

Further the Board has notified the present Transfer Agent, 1st Global Stock Transfer to do a full and complete audit of the company and/or will have an independent auditor audit the company and as soon as that audit is complete the Company has retained Pacific Stock Transfer, Inc., to become the new Transfer Agent for CMKM Diamonds, Inc.

Is the audit done? Is that tomorrows PR?

[This message has been edited by will (edited June 24, 2004).]

[This message has been edited by will (edited June 24, 2004).]

---