Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board
  Micro Penny Stocks, Penny Stocks Under $0.10
  CMKX II new Thread. Get it while you CAN ! (Page 47)

Post New Topic  Post A Reply
profile | register | preferences | faq | search

UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone!
This topic is 53 pages long:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53 
next newest topic | next oldest topic
Author Topic:   CMKX II new Thread. Get it while you CAN !
Meshoe45
Member
posted June 23, 2004 09:54     Click Here to See the Profile for Meshoe45     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Every time it closes one low it dips down another .0001 each time.

IP: Logged

VNGNTN1
Member
posted June 23, 2004 10:02     Click Here to See the Profile for VNGNTN1     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
A reverse split / or a dividend (both rumor)can only affect Authorized shares. The MM will probably need to respond. HOW YOU SAY ?
By further shorting in direct opposite proportion to VALUE.
VAN

[This message has been edited by VNGNTN1 (edited June 23, 2004).]

IP: Logged

TradingWizard
Member
posted June 23, 2004 11:02     Click Here to See the Profile for TradingWizard     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Upside:
originally posted by TradingWizard:
TW,
I answered this same questions just a few pages back but I'll do so again. Let's say you own 1 million shares, they do a 1 for 1000 reverse split, and the day the split occurs the stock is at .0005. After the split you would now have 1000 shares valued at .50 each. Same value but fewer shares. After the split what would happen is anyones guess. In most cases the stock tumbles but that might not be true in this case. If they have a huge o/s number it could be viewed as a positive and the price might actually increase. That is only a guess though.

Upside, I do remember your explanation, it was on the other thread and thank you for that and for this repeat explantion. I guess I got a little concerned with GFYF split 1:250, but now that a re-read it again this morning I realized that I misunderstood some of the statements.
While I have you on this topic, can you explaing why you think a huge number of o/s can have the possitive effect on the pps. Thanks.

------------------
'Alone we can do so little; together we can do so much.' - Helen Keller

[This message has been edited by TradingWizard (edited June 23, 2004).]

IP: Logged

pennywise
Member
posted June 23, 2004 11:15     Click Here to See the Profile for pennywise     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Why did I buy shares of CMKX?
I bought shares of CMKX for the potential that I could make money, lots of money!

Anyone interested in understanding the great potential of CMKX just has to look at the map of the exploration properties at Fort a la Corne area.
http://casavantmining.com/images/17x11_Oct03.pdf

Start by looking at the areas owned by De Beers and their partners. Just see the number of kemberlite pipes that have been discovered and remember that....
- 80% of Saskatchewans' kimberlite pipes are diamondiferous.
- 50% contain diamonds over one millimeter in size.
- A high percentage of diamonds recovered are clear, inclusion-free and exhibit good crystal form.
- Pipes said to have erupted under inland sea and therefore have not been exposed to weathering or glaciation.
- Pipes lie within 300 feet of surface.
- Area accessible by paved all-weather road, with water and power readily available.

Now look at the claims that Casavant Minings owns and just imagine how many undiscovered diamond bearing kimberlite pipes must exist in this area.

The growth potential for CMKX is huge!

Ultimately you must decide for yourselves...
GLTA

IP: Logged

HitMe101
Member
posted June 23, 2004 11:34     Click Here to See the Profile for HitMe101     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Holding steady for the most part,I think they are pushing the impatient ones out & the swingers.This is a long term thing if ya want make anything.

IP: Logged

cool1sh
Member
posted June 23, 2004 11:41     Click Here to See the Profile for cool1sh     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
http://cbs.marketwatch.com/news/newsfinder/pulseone.asp?dateid=38161.4281597222-815435292&doctype=806&siteid=mktw&selCount=20&value=Maggie+McNeil+&property=word&

SEC approves rule to curb short selling abuses By Maggie McNeil
WASHINGTON (CBS.MW) -- The Securities and Exchange Commission Wednesday approved a new rule aimed at preventing abusive short selling. The rule requires all short sale trades be settled within 13 consecutive days after the transaction. This rule mirrors an existing regulation for long sale transactions. The SEC also approved a new pilot program which loosens short sale regulations on companies that trade within the Russell 3000.

IP: Logged

makemerich
Member
posted June 23, 2004 12:22     Click Here to See the Profile for makemerich     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
when might we see an effect (if much at all) from the SEC rule?

IP: Logged

WWJD-thru-me
Member
posted June 23, 2004 12:24     Click Here to See the Profile for WWJD-thru-me     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
cool1ish-This is for short selling. What about naked short selling of OTC stocks? Hopefully they will address this. It is unbelievable how blatant it is and how much it hurts both businesses and shareholders. I am barely trading OTC stocks now. I have lots of shares in many companies already that I am holding and will sell at profit and I will occasionally buy some at the bottom anticipating a move but most of the micro stocks are not selling near their value. But even with good news it is hard to be inspired to buy when the stock barely hiccups before the short selling occurs. Some stocks are overvalued and/or are garbage. Some that have good news, good PR's and Momo are tanked. CMKX appeals to me because I think the issue of covering the huge short position will be forced and it will happen soon. If the MM's reap what they sow they are in for a heap of hurt.
GLTA-IMO-Debi

IP: Logged

will
Member
posted June 23, 2004 12:29     Click Here to See the Profile for will     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I swore off of this thread since Paul pulled his stunt of 'I know something, but can't tell ya' However, I guess my conviction isn't that strong, and I just have to ask. If that is how a sample report is suppose to look, then why didn't CMKX's look like that?
quote:
Originally posted by WWJD-thru-me:
Cabbage-Now that is what a sample report should look like. Hopefully we will get to read ours like that soon. GLTA-Debi

IP: Logged

DeadSurf
Member
posted June 23, 2004 12:52     Click Here to See the Profile for DeadSurf     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
hey everyone...i got this email yesterday...it's simply one of those email spam ads i think but it talks of a company sinlar to cmkx...i post it on here for you guys to read and see what everyone thinks about it in relation to our cmkx.
--------------------------------------------
Advertisement

* 20 miles to the northwest, Ashton Mining has uncovered 900
diamonds!...

* To the southeast, DeBeers, the world's largest diamond
producer, is in an exploration frenzy- they won't tell anyone
what they've found...

* And right in the middle of this region a small company owns
75,000 acres with over 30 geological anomalies...


Potential value of each anomaly that contains diamonds:
$1 to $3 BILLION!

Dear Investor,

My name is James DiGeorgia, Editor of the authoritative Gold & Energy
Advisor, and after 20 years of advising thousands of investors, I've
rarely seen a mining opportunity like this...

Unknown junior exploration companies yielded staggering returns for
investors when Canada's first major diamond mine was discovered.
Companies such as...

* Aber Diamond which saw its stock soar from $1.50 to over $40.
Tiffany's invested $100 million and Aber Diamond now owns
Harry Winston's (the most luxurious jeweler in America).

* Dia Met Minerals discovered the Ekati diamond deposit and
shares of their stock rose 13,300% in the first year or so
after the discovery.

* Winspear Resources was bought out by DeBeers in June of 2000 -
yielding returns of over 600% to early investors.

These now very successful diamond companies were right in the middle
of Canada's first major diamond exploration area.

And right now, on the other side of Hudson Bay, in the Otish Mountains
of Quebec, a second major diamond area strikingly similar to the one
in the Northwest Territory is being explored. Both major diamond
producers and junior explorers recognizing the potential billions of
dollars to be made have been rushing to stake claims. Diamonds
already have been found at one spot in the region which means
(according to geological precedent) there's plenty more in the
surrounding land.

One exploration company, the Otish Mountain Diamond Company (symbol
OMDC:OTCBB), has already acquired the mining rights to 75,000 acres of
mining claims right in the heart of the new Otish Mountain diamond
region. And while the company's shares may be selling for peanuts now,
the first confirmation of diamonds on its property could easily send
shares soaring to many times their current value.

I'm about to tell you why a small investment in this company could pay
off enormously! First let me give you a few examples of junior mining
companies, strikingly similar to Otish, that have made early investors
millions of dollars...

Aber Diamond

In 1992 this company was a Canadian junior diamond exploration company
trading for $1.50 a share. Today their stock sells for over $40 a
share and they have a market cap of $2 billion ($2.5 billion in
Canadian dollars).

If you had invested $10,000 in Aber Diamond in 1991 you would have
almost $2 million today.

Tiffany's invested $100 million in Aber Diamond and after only a few
years their investment is now worth $325 million.

Aber Diamond is now one of the world's largest diamond producers. They
also own Harry Winston's, the most luxurious jeweler in America.

Dia Met Minerals

The Canadian diamond boom, which began in the late 1990s with the
success of the Ekati mine in the Northwest Territories, has already
produced remarkable wealth for owners of many mining firms.

One of these firms was Dia Met Minerals Ltd., which discovered the
Ekati diamond deposit; it's 29% interest in the deposit was bought by
the Australian mining giant BHP Billiton Ltd. in 2001 for
approximately $480 million - valuing the mine at $1.7 billion.

Dia Met was a small Canadian junior exploration company just like
Otish Mountain Diamond Company (OMDC).

If you had invested $10,000 in Dia Met Minerals in their early days
you would have made in excess of $5 million at the time of discovery -
that doesn't include the additional gains you would have made at the
time of sale.

Winspear Resources

In June 2000, DeBeers bought out Winspear Diamond for 260 million
Canadian dollars, which was 170 million in U.S. dollars at the time.

DeBeers paid $4.25 per share - a 77% premium per share over the
closing price on the previous day of trading.

If you had invested $10,000 in 1997 you would have been bought out
less than 3 years later for approximately $61,000.

Demand Outstrips Supply

The price of diamonds has shown robust growth ever since the Canadian
diamond rush got under way in the mid-90s. More recently, wholesale
diamond prices rose 10% in 2003 as demand for diamond jewelry surged
once again in the U.S. And so far in 2004, the wholesale giant DeBeers
has announced two price hikes - a 3% increase in January and a 5% rise
in March.

For my full report and no obligation (no credit card needed)
bonuses...

Click Here: http://d3xo01.jda003.net/cgi-bin/link.pl?id=0068


About James DiGeorgia

Mr. DiGeorgia, founding editor of Gold & Energy Advisor, is one of
America's best-known investment advisors specializing in gold, copper
and other natural resources. He is a former editor of the legendary
Silver & Gold Reporthas been quoted in such publications as Money
Magazine, The New York Times, Barron's, USA Today and dozens of other
periodicalsand has successfully guided thousands of investors over the
years through his private firm, 21st Century Investor.

IP: Logged

Upside
Member
posted June 23, 2004 12:59     Click Here to See the Profile for Upside     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
originally posted by TradingWizard:
quote:
While I have you on this topic, can you explaing why you think a huge number of o/s can have the possitive effect on the pps. Thanks.

TW,
If the outstanding share count comes out in the hundreds of billions, I think that a reverse split might have a positive impact simply because the number is staggering. With that many shares outstanding the pps might never move unless CMKX becomes a company the size of Ford, IBM, etc. A reverse split reducing their shares into the 100's of millions would greatly increase the chance of their pps rising if they become a profitable company. If the number comes out on the low side of the estimates I have seen, somewhere in the 10 - 30 billion range, that alone would be viewed as a positive and a reverse split would be viewed as unnecessary and probably send the price down. It's really all about market psychology and how people view things and react to them. The scenarios are only my guesses and it could go the complete other way too, we'll just have to wait and see.

IP: Logged

WinsumLosesum
Member
posted June 23, 2004 13:40     Click Here to See the Profile for WinsumLosesum     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Thanks, DeadSurf.

I liked the part that says:

"And while the company's shares may be selling for peanuts now,
the first confirmation of diamonds on its property could easily send shares soaring to many times their current value."

They're trading @ .45 right now.

Man, I'd like CMKX to be trading for "peanuts", too!

quote:
Originally posted by DeadSurf:
hey everyone...i got this email yesterday...it's simply one of those email spam ads i think but it talks of a company sinlar to cmkx...i post it on here for you guys to read and see what everyone thinks about it in relation to our cmkx.

IP: Logged

PAUL
Member
posted June 23, 2004 13:58     Click Here to See the Profile for PAUL     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I will be glad to e-mail it to you also if you would like, just like I offered yesterday. I have sent it to about five people yesterday and today. None of them have posted it ither.

If you want it, send me an e-mail and I will send it to you. Then PLEASE, if you want, post it.

I have explained my reasons enough.

I would appreciate it if you would stop with the digs toward me. I assure you, I can not stand conflict. I feel like I have been bickering with you about this since yesterday. All I asked for was some help with some DD. Then you start making a big deal out of it.

Again if you want it e-mail me and I will send it to you. Again it is no big deal. Again if you want to post it please do. But I would hope that you would consider NOT posting it on a public forum until you or someone can verify if it has anything to do with CMKX.

PAUL


quote:
Originally posted by will:
I swore off of this thread since Paul pulled his stunt of 'I know something, but can't tell ya' However, I guess my conviction isn't that strong, and I just have to ask. If that is how a sample report is suppose to look, then why didn't CMKX's look like that?

[This message has been edited by PAUL (edited June 23, 2004).]

IP: Logged

emunahstock
Member
posted June 23, 2004 14:16     Click Here to See the Profile for emunahstock     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Hey guys.

I am still in this very big. Haven't sold any of my possition since .0001

I hope you are picking up some more shares at these prices.

We are way undervalued at this point, just keep reminding yourself this through all the marketmaker covering. WE ARE WAY UNDERVALUED!

IP: Logged

will
Member
posted June 23, 2004 14:17     Click Here to See the Profile for will     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
No thank you. Just the implication of how it was done was irresponisible. I have since seen it, it was 4 year old trash that if posted had no relevance. I don't care to discuss it any further, and won't bring to the public's attention again. I apologize if I caused you stress, but maybe we should all think of the impact a post might have on others.
A lot of gung ho and negative crap is posted about this stock. If you dare ask anyone to explain their position you're either pumping or bashing. The pumpers seem to violate their responsiblity of fair and balanced more so than the bashers. When news is vague and ambiguis, it was deliberate, displying Urbans genius. When is bad and detailed it's incomplete and bashing. Just be resposible and fair.

IP: Logged

PAUL
Member
posted June 23, 2004 14:17     Click Here to See the Profile for PAUL     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I do not have a large position (wish I did) but, what I have are free shares. I think I am holding them pretty strong.

Paul

IP: Logged

TradingWizard
Member
posted June 23, 2004 14:23     Click Here to See the Profile for TradingWizard     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Paul good answer.

Upside thank you for the reverse split explanation :-)

[This message has been edited by TradingWizard (edited June 23, 2004).]

IP: Logged

emunahstock
Member
posted June 23, 2004 14:23     Click Here to See the Profile for emunahstock     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The future of this company is very bright and knowone can deny this. We just have to be a bit more patient then planed but I think we will still be suprised and it wouldn't take so long.

IP: Logged

will
Member
posted June 23, 2004 14:29     Click Here to See the Profile for will     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Nor do I have a large position, but the responsibility of posting is not diminished by the amount of shares you hold. Y'all can't have it both ways, Ambiguity = genius and cunning, and in the next breath, that's how a sample report should look. Well, which is it?
quote:
Originally posted by PAUL:
I do not have a large position (wish I did) but, what I have are free shares. I think I am holding them pretty strong.

Paul


[This message has been edited by will (edited June 23, 2004).]

IP: Logged

PAUL
Member
posted June 23, 2004 14:36     Click Here to See the Profile for PAUL     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
My post regarding my position was in respons to the post from EMU.. just above your post. Perhaps I should have quoted it. Sorry for the misunderstanding.

Paul

quote:
Originally posted by will:
Nor do I have a large position, but the responsibility of posting is not diminished by the amount of shares you hold. Y'all can't have it both ways, Ambiguity = genius and cunning, and in the next breath, that's how a sample report should look. Well, which is it?

[This message has been edited by will (edited June 23, 2004).]


IP: Logged

WWJD-thru-me
Member
posted June 23, 2004 14:41     Click Here to See the Profile for WWJD-thru-me     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Paul, I know you to be a man of incredible integrity in your life and here on the boards. Thanks for all your contributions icluding not posting what you could not verify. -Debi
---------------------------------------------
Will-If you want to fight why not find someone who enjoys it? I am kind of scrappy. Did you ever get beat up by a girl before? -Debi Just half kidding. Mellow out a little on this stock. Pretty much everything there is to know about this stock that we are going to know before the company releases more press releases is here. To keep whining that the longs are pumping and if anyone disagrees they are called a basher is a tad disingenuous. If you have something of substance to offer please do so.
Thanks IMO-Debi

IP: Logged

VNGNTN1
Member
posted June 23, 2004 14:55     Click Here to See the Profile for VNGNTN1     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
WILL
If you have some extra time, could you disect my previous post @ 10:02 for all the newbies here ?
VAN

IP: Logged

will
Member
posted June 23, 2004 15:16     Click Here to See the Profile for will     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Deb, deb, deb, it is not a fight I am spoilong for neither with you nor Paul. I only ask how can y'all have things both ways? There isn't any whining here. I am just looking for fair and balanced. Van do your own interpretation.
quote:
Originally posted by WWJD-thru-me:
Paul, I know you to be a man of incredible integrity in your life and here on the boards. Thanks for all your contributions icluding not posting what you could not verify. -Debi

IP: Logged

VNGNTN1
Member
posted June 23, 2004 15:18     Click Here to See the Profile for VNGNTN1     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
KINDA WHAT I THOUGHT !

IP: Logged

will
Member
posted June 23, 2004 15:21     Click Here to See the Profile for will     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Oh, you embarrassed me because I can't translate your double speak? Because I don't know/understand the implaications of that, I should not have an opinion about obvious inconsistancies? Is that what you're saying?
quote:
Originally posted by VNGNTN1:
KINDA WHAT I THOUGHT !

[This message has been edited by will (edited June 23, 2004).]

IP: Logged

WWJD-thru-me
Member
posted June 23, 2004 15:34     Click Here to See the Profile for WWJD-thru-me     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Will wrote: knee-hi-boot-gurl:
Someone can come here with a signed note from Jesus telling me to sell , and I wouldn't pay any attention to it. I have made up my mind this is either going to go to the .XX in the next few months, or be worthless, or stagering around in the .00X's. Makes no difference at this point. Keep this in mind, read the company's PR's and base your decision on that, not some halfassed, ambigous comment design to unerve you. I don't care who makes the comment stock God, Guru, Superstar...I have made up my mind to make up my OWN mind regarding this one.
---------------------------------------------
Will, Will, Will, I have been consistent in my posts about this stock. I bought some early thinking the mineral rights they purchased had some value and they would eventually hit diamonds with all the kimberlite they have. I bought more after believing that there is a huge Naked short position in this and more still once I realized the company is addressing this in a win for the shareholders kind of way. Is this a risky investment? Yes, Do I think it has the ability to crumble? Of course, but I don't think this price decrease we are seeing is related to CMKX's lack of potential or anything negative about them. I see this as a validation of the short postition which has to be covered by the MM's. I am hoping the company and it's law firm will finalize the filing paperwork and give us the information we are all waiting for. Until then the MM's are able to buy any shares they can shake out cheap. It is obvious they sat on the price when Billions of buyers were tripping over each other to buy. The press release about the diamonds that spooked some investors didn't rattle me at all. I was disappointed with it but I think it may have been a partial release to get our Canadian partners trading. Since it was negative anyway why not release a totally negative sample report? Why only a partial? My take on this is there is more positive in there which will be released with the share structure, naked short position, partnerships, financial agreements, additional finds and any other news the company has for us.
GLTY,GLTA-IMO-DD-Debi

IP: Logged

will
Member
posted June 23, 2004 15:48     Click Here to See the Profile for will     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
........and I stand by that. I haven't sold a single share, and don't intend to, and if it goes to .0003 my current avg buy I will purchase more. That wasn't/isn't the issue. I neiter pumped nor bashed. I asked, (without being personal and assigning it to anyone person), how can the same information be interpreted two different ways. That is all I was asking. Seeing a post whether by design or accident unnerved people, I challenged it, and it wasn't cleared up where posted. One doesnot have to understand quantum physics to see these things. I asked for an explanation and didn't get one. I am with you as far as CMKX is concerned, I just want to understand how things can be interpreted for convenience.
quote:
Originally posted by WWJD-thru-me:
Will wrote: knee-hi-boot-gurl:
Someone can come here with a signed note from Jesus telling me to sell , and I wouldn't pay any attention to it. I have made up my mind this is either going to go to the .XX in the next few months, or be worthless, or stagering around in the .00X's. Makes no difference at this point. Keep this in mind, read the company's PR's and base your decision on that, not some halfassed, ambigous comment design to unerve you. I don't care who makes the comment stock God, Guru, Superstar...I have made up my mind to make up my OWN mind regarding this one.

IP: Logged

Meshoe45
Member
posted June 23, 2004 15:59     Click Here to See the Profile for Meshoe45     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
The last 2 minutes of the day CMKX always drops to the low of the day.
ERRRR

IP: Logged

will
Member
posted June 23, 2004 16:16     Click Here to See the Profile for will     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I show a .0005 close.
quote:
Originally posted by Meshoe45:
The last 2 minutes of the day CMKX always drops to the low of the day.
ERRRR

IP: Logged

VNGNTN1
Member
posted June 23, 2004 16:36     Click Here to See the Profile for VNGNTN1     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
WILL
Who will CMKX sell diamonds to when mined ?
VAN

IP: Logged

Doji say what!!
Member
posted June 23, 2004 16:41     Click Here to See the Profile for Doji say what!!     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by VNGNTN1:
WILL
Who will CMKX sell diamonds to when mined ?
VAN

de beers of course!!! they are the only buyers
http://edwardjayepstein.com/diamond/prologue.htm

78,500,000 holding

later

IP: Logged

VNGNTN1
Member
posted June 23, 2004 17:05     Click Here to See the Profile for VNGNTN1     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
DOJI
I know "read whole article". WILL has a lot to say and challenges others, just thought I could entice some original thought.
VAN

IP: Logged

VNGNTN1
Member
posted June 23, 2004 17:09     Click Here to See the Profile for VNGNTN1     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
DOJI
I know "read whole article". WILL has a lot to say and challenges others, just thought I could entice some original thought.
Ran across this author in a completely different research project. He must get around.
VAN

IP: Logged

cool1sh
Member
posted June 23, 2004 17:23     Click Here to See the Profile for cool1sh     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
From IHUB..


FEAR FACTOR.

I'm going to ask you to step outside of your normal box of thinking. Step into the shoes of a brokerage house that has made a mistake. Now in the past, their strategy has worked 98 out of 100 times to make them disgusting amounts of money. The 2 times it has failed, they were still able to get out with only moderate losses. To them this has been a slam dunk virtually every time. But this time, they actually have made a mistake that has started to concern them. If you're still in the camp about "I don't believe naked shorts even exist" then you need to read www.thefaulkingtruth.com and you need to start getting a clue about what is happening. So back to our brokerage house with a problem.

What do you do if you are them? You have choices. Choice number one is to start covering as quickly as possible. Let's see, that will tip your hand to every other market maker as well as generate further buying momentum from traders and momentum players. All of this could spiral upwards so rapidly that you could be completely and totally annihilated. Hmmmmm, gonna have to pass on that option. Assessment: VERY RISKY.

Choice number two is to try and hold the stock down just a little but keep ticking it up SLOWLY so that you can cover at each successive price level and average your way out of this situation. Now the problem with that is that market psychology won't cooperate. If the stock keeps going UP, ironically, more and more people keep buying and fewer are willing to sell because "hey, it's still going up." Eventually, enough buying is now coming in that you just can't cover all that well. Hmmmm, doesn't seem like a good option either. Assessment: PRETTY RISKY.

Choice number three. Let's get back to old school basics. Fear and impatience. The harder we can drop this, the more frustrated longs will get. This stock is no different than the other hundreds we've crushed before. So-called "longs" are looking to retire by next week and if this stock is down 50% since they bought it, they will get weak in the knees QUICKLY. It has ALWAYS worked and it WILL work in this case. Plus, we have the added bonus of a law firm that is probably going to give us a large window time frame with which to inflict maximum pain on the share price. Law firms are notoriously known to slow things down and with all the clamoring for a press release, the longer it goes without one, the more shares we can shake out without any risk of rising momentum. Let's see how much pain these shareholders can take. Let's see just HOW long they'll last. Hey, if it fails, we still have options 1 and 2. But this is WORTH exploring. Plus, the other market makers are following our lead. They aren't about to go long on this if they sense that the selling is going to continue. This is a good, solid game plan that has no downside compared to the other two options. Assessment: MINIMAL RISK (ONLY COMPANY PR COULD CAUSE FAILURE)

That in my opinion is what is happening. In the past, they have won this way every time. In the past, the companies have been so brutalized by these tactics that they can only muster up a weak, feeble defense to which the shorts slap back down pretty quickly. The media reinforcements are called in when they need a little extra push. Usually that's a sign that the short selling is not going as QUICKLY as they have planned. But the media push helps accelerate that.

Now query a few things:

How many times in the past have the companies the shorts tanked been able to get a world-class law firm to step in on their behalf? Answer: None. Shorts know that when a company is on the ropes with its share price, the company can barely afford anything, let alone solid legal expertise. We have the legal firepower to combat this. Shorts have not encountered this before.

Why are there negative bashing articles appearing for a stock at .0004? This is a stock in the hundredths of a penny. Most of the articles that ever come out from the shorts are to bash down stocks sometimes in the dollars, sometimes in the .70s to .80s, but at .0004??????? Why are reinforcements being brought in at this level? Answer: Help is needed. And FAST.

How many times in the past have people had this much of a free ride? Usually, this game isn't played at the .0001 level. But for some reason they got a little cocky here. Then it blew up in such a way that a TON of people were able to get "free rides" by selling off their initial investment. Before the shorts were even able to lob a counterattack, these people already had their money off the table. Instead of sitting back "scared" of losing their investment, they are simply waiting. The "Fear Factor" is gone on a very large percentage of shareholders. How do shorts combat this? Answer: Don't know. Haven't really seen it before. This is a tough one.


Welcome to the pennies world, only this time you happened to have entered what is shaping up to be a true heavyweight bout. Shorts have cleaned the clock of just about everyone that has entered their arena. Someone new however has entered the arena. Someone they haven't seen before. Someone they haven't scouted. Someone they aren't yet quite sure how to size up. So they're dancing around doing what they've always done and it's working a little here and there. But quite honestly, it doesn't seem to be phasing their new opponent. And suddenly the shorts begin sensing something they haven't seen before. No fear. CMKX's strategy hasn't unfolded yet. But it seems to be a virtual guarantee with our new law firm that it will NOT be like any the shorts have ever seen before. Will it be a knockout blow? Perhaps. Or it could just be a systematic pummelling until the fight is called. But the shorts are in my opinion for the first time NOT in a superior position, no matter HOW weak they try to make the stock look.

Notice how gloomy all the boards appear today. This is exactly how the shorts want it. Oh, sure, we can't PROVE that anyone is shorting and bashers will incessantly claim that "Urban is printing shares" but, hmmm, they can't prove that either. Naked shorting is the perfectly cloaked crime since the market makers can make the situation appear to be as dark as they'd like and nobody truly knows why. Notice more longs suddenly admitting to "selling a few shares just to cover my initial investment." Actually, at these prices if 100% of people sold to "cover their initial investment", the shorts might get covered on a HUGE percent of their short. Now THAT'S a goal working towards. Maximum pain is their only option right now. Giving this stock a fear factor of 10 is their ultimate goal. They will do this for as long as they can because their only other options are even more unappetizing.

Shorts have the upper hand TODAY. But that is only because they do not KNOW what is coming. Granted we don't either, but I feel VERY comfortable saying that thanks to our new law firm, it will NOT be handled in a way that 99.9% of every other pink or otc stock has combatted the problem.

I have been through this kind of pain many, many times with other otcs. I knew this would happen but was still not willing to risk anything for a quick trade. I do believe this is the opportunity of a lifetime and I'm not willing to be caught outside of my trade at the precise moment when something breaks loose. I've accumulated slowly and at a full average of about .00055. I'm comfortable with that position even if I lose 60% of my investment on paper FIRST before it turns around. THAT is the only way in my opinion to play these pennies. THAT is why you will hear so many people that have been burned before say "scam" as soon as you try telling them about a pink sheet. It is a TOUGH place to make money and you can bet that with CMKX, it's going to be the TOUGHEST place of all.

Good luck to all. I am exhausted after writing this. LOL Don't know if it helped anyone at all, but when I have thoughts I jot them down. Hopefully more often than not, they're worth reading. LOL

Z

IP: Logged

cool1sh
Member
posted June 23, 2004 17:42     Click Here to See the Profile for cool1sh     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Was Melvin on IBC today?
I got this from RB.. This is what he said

"He and UC are workin' 24x7
the shore gold pr was interesting
everything is going according to plan"

Anyone heard?

IP: Logged

WinsumLosesum
Member
posted June 23, 2004 17:58     Click Here to See the Profile for WinsumLosesum     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by cool1sh:
From IHUB..
FEAR FACTOR.

Good find, cool. Sounds good to me.

IP: Logged

Doji say what!!
Member
posted June 23, 2004 18:32     Click Here to See the Profile for Doji say what!!     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
CLICK ON THIS GREAT CHARTING AND DETAILS ON CMKX!!!!
http://cmkx.proboards34.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&num=1088025474

IP: Logged

tahoechris
Member
posted June 23, 2004 19:07     Click Here to See the Profile for tahoechris     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
someone on another board contacted the transfer agent, and apparantly cmkx only has 700 shareholders, that seems like a real good number to me. also said everything should be available in 1 to 2 weeks..

IP: Logged

pharmdman
Member
posted June 23, 2004 19:11     Click Here to See the Profile for pharmdman     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
quote:
Originally posted by tahoechris:
someone on another board contacted the transfer agent, and apparantly cmkx only has 700 shareholders, that seems like a real good number to me. also said everything should be available in 1 to 2 weeks..

don't forget. "street" shares from electronic shareholders/brokers (i.e., Ameritrade, etrade, etc.) count as one shareholder each. Unless you've asked for and received actual stock certificates, you're not counted.

IP: Logged

STAR GAZER
Member
posted June 23, 2004 19:14     Click Here to See the Profile for STAR GAZER     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
cool1sh you mentioned that people have been burned playing pink sheet stocks and so say scam when they see one touted. You also say that pink sheet stocks are a tough place to make money. I LOVE PINK SHEET STOCKS. That's where I have had my greatest winners. If a person researches the stocks, they can find a
lot of great stocks. And, just as in CMKX, they have to sit back and wait, maybe acquire
free shares. All it takes is a few big winners to overcome the losers that you will have. And boy, are there some BIG WINNERS in this group. And anyway, playing the penny and
micropenny stocks is fun.

IP: Logged

prdponce
Member
posted June 23, 2004 19:21     Click Here to See the Profile for prdponce     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Have anyone seen this one. Interesting.

By: pedro20040
23 Jun 2004, 11:38 AM EDT
Msg. 324451 of 326228
Jump to msg. #
Outstanding Shares of CMKX (rough estimate)

I ordered copies of the complete Nevada Secretary of State corporate filings for CMKM Diamonds, Inc. (CMKX) and Casavant International Mining (CIM). My intent was to somehow estimate the O/S Shares of CMKX.

****
Dean Heller
Nevada Secretary of State
Corporate Information

URBAN CASAVANT CAROLYN CASAVANT EMMERSON KOCH
----------CASAVANT INTERNATIONAL MINING CORPORATION
URBAN CASAVANT CORY KLASSEN CORY KLASSEN
----------CMKM DIAMONDS INC.
URBAN CASAVANT DAVID DESORMEAU DAVID DESORMEAU
----------CASAVANT GOLF COMPANY
URBAN CASAVAUT ALLAN MOEN ALLAN MOEN
----------FORT A LA CORNE DIAMONDFIELDS, INC.
http://sos.state.nv.us/ofcsrh3.asp
______________________________________________

Let us look at what we do know.

Last SEC 10Q Filing September 30, 2002
CYBER MARK INTERNATIONAL CORP. (aka CMKX)

Stockholders' equity
Common stock, authorized 500,000,000 shares at $.0001 par value, issued and outstanding 352,223,510 shares and 42,223,510 shares, respectively

Preferred stock, authorized 3,000,000 shares at $.001 par value, issued and outstanding one (1) share.
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1092299/000111776802000039/cmseptq.htm

We are looking at 500,000,000 shares authorized
______________________________________________

DEF 14C filed 02/03/2003

Outstanding Voting Stock of the Company

In order to effectuate the merger with the Casavant Mineral Claims, the majority shareholders' holding more than 51% of the voting shares approved an increase in the authorized capital of the Company from 500,000,000 to 10,000,000,000 with the cancellation of all Preferred shares. Prior to this action, the Company had 3,000,000 Preferred shares purchased by the majority shareholders in 2001 for $235,000 from the Jarvis Entertainment Group, Inc., thereby giving them voting control of the Company.

On November 25, 2002, the Company's shares were valued at $0.0014 and the Casavant Mineral Claims were valued at over $10,000,000 in situ, but did not include pre-claims exploration, consulting and other expenses incurred (the "Additional Claims Expenses"). These Additional Claims Expenses were valued at $3,000,000 at the time of the merger.

As of the Record Date, there were 7,241,653,404 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding. The Common Stock constitutes the outstanding class of voting securities of the Company. Each share of Common Stock entitles the holder to one (1) vote on all matters submitted to the shareholders.
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1092299/000111776803000002/0001117768-03-000002-index.htm

Total authorized shares 10,000,000,000: Total issued and outstanding shares as of January 15, 2003 was 7,241,653,404 common shares
______________________________________________

SEC S-8 filed 05/02/2003

Item 1. Plan Information

The Company is offering shares of its common stock to various individuals for consulting services on the Company's behalf. This issuance of shares is being made pursuant to consulting agreements between the Company and the individuals. The Company has equated this number of shares to the value of the consulting services provided or to be provided by these individuals. The shares issued hereunder will not be subject to any resale restrictions. The following individuals will receive the number of shares listed next to their names:

James Kenny 530,000,000
Timothy Cammell 530,000,000
http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1092299/000111776803000024/casareg.txt

Total authorized shares 10,000,000,000: Total issued and outstanding shares as of May 2, 2003 was 8,301,653,404 common shares
______________________________________________

Stock Split

Capital Change=shs increased by 2 for 1 split. Ex-date=09/30/2003. Rec date=09/30/2003. Pay date=09/30/2003.

This is where it gets a little tricky. We know that there was a 2-1 stock split. So basing on assumption, we multiply our authorized and issued shares by 2.

Total authorized shares 20,000,000,000: Total issued and outstanding shares as of May 2, 2003 was 16,603,306,808
______________________________________________

Let us now go back to a press release on December 17, 2003.

Casavant Mining Kimberlite International Announces That the Company Has Officially Retired 16.5 Billion Shares Back to the Treasury
12/17/2003 3:17:06 PM
LAS VEGAS, Dec 17, 2003 /PRNewswire-FirstCall via Comtex/ -- Casavant Mining Kimberlite International (Pink Sheets: CMKM) announced today that the company has officially retired 16,520,477,200 shares of CMKM stock back to the Treasury.
Urban Casavant, President of CMKM stated, "This is a huge step to create greater shareholder value by reducing the amount of shares issued of CMKM by over 16.5 billion shares. We also plan to retire more shares back to the treasury as soon as all necessary paper work is completed."

/////
I want you to remember that one word above “OFFICIAL.”
“officially retired 16,502,477,200 shares.”
//////

Issued shares was 16,603,306,808 from above.
(Issued shares 16,603,306,808) less (Officially retired shares 16,502,477,200) = (Outstanding shares 100,829,608)

Total authorized shares 20,000,000,000: Total issued and outstanding shares as of December 17, 2003 was 100,829,608.
______________________________________________

Here is a second press release on January 9, 2004.

Casavant Mining Kimberlite International Announces Retirement of 1.8 Billion Shares
1/9/2004 9:05:33 AM
LAS VEGAS, Jan 09, 2004 /PRNewswire-FirstCall via Comtex/ -- Casavant Mining Kimberlite International (Pink Sheets: CMKM) announced today that the company has approved the retirement of an additional 1.8 billion shares of CMKM stock. The company plans to retire these shares of stock back to the treasury to create greater shareholder value. The company also plans to wrap of negotiations of buy out of some mining claims and announce details of transaction by the end of the month.

/////
Notice this release does not say “OFFICIALLY.”
It says “Approved” …
"approved the retirement of 1.8 billion shares."
/////

How can CMKX retire 1.8 billion shares when there are only 100,829,608 million shares outstanding?
(Naked Short Selling by MM’s)

_________________________________________________

I am not finished. I ordered some documents from Nevada. My credit card was charges 2 days ago. I did not receive the documents yesterday (06/22/2004). Hopefully today.

As soon as I receive the documents from Nevada, I will update this post.

I wanted to get this up so no one gets scared and starts selling

IP: Logged

joeyisthebest
Member
posted June 23, 2004 19:36     Click Here to See the Profile for joeyisthebest     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
hi nice post hope that nobody sells because this is the oppertunity of your lifetime and mine. No one will ever see a stock run like this will when the audit comes out.

IP: Logged

cool1sh
Member
posted June 23, 2004 19:59     Click Here to See the Profile for cool1sh     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Did I? Are you sure?

quote:
Originally posted by STAR GAZER:
cool1sh you mentioned that people have been burned playing pink sheet stocks and so say scam when they see one touted. You also say that pink sheet stocks are a tough place to make money. I LOVE PINK SHEET STOCKS. That's where I have had my greatest winners. If a person researches the stocks, they can find a
lot of great stocks. And, just as in CMKX, they have to sit back and wait, maybe acquire
free shares. All it takes is a few big winners to overcome the losers that you will have. And boy, are there some BIG WINNERS in this group. And anyway, playing the penny and
micropenny stocks is fun.

IP: Logged

Upside
Member
posted June 23, 2004 22:46     Click Here to See the Profile for Upside     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
prdponce,

Your post can be tracked up until the 12/17/03 part. By that time they were not a non-reporting company. There authorized could have been any number they wanted it to be. I believe it is now a known fact that the authorized is 500 billion. While I'm not saying this happened, they could have retired those 16 billion then turned around and printed and sold 32 billion. No documents from Nevada will give the total outstanding number. It is a number only known to the corporate insiders. The documents from Nevada will only give you the last publicly reported number. If there are in fact all 500 billion outstanding it's a number that simply boggles the mind. If its true there is no hope of this stock doing anything. If however the number comes out in Debi's range estimate, 10 - 30 billion, while still a staggering amount, it's a number they can possibly do something with.

IP: Logged

chshore
Member
posted June 23, 2004 22:59     Click Here to See the Profile for chshore     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I thought they said the new site would be up EARLY next week? Its MID next week and still no new site. What gives?

IP: Logged

VNGNTN1
Member
posted June 23, 2004 23:00     Click Here to See the Profile for VNGNTN1     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
UPSIDE
That may not be true. Illinois may be different than Nevada but I have to file a document each year with the state with all change in capitalization.(Domestic Corporation Annual Report)
VAN

[This message has been edited by VNGNTN1 (edited June 23, 2004).]

IP: Logged

sdrobert
Member
posted June 23, 2004 23:08     Click Here to See the Profile for sdrobert     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
I was told I cant start a new post thats lame I think a smasher replied to my thread!!!

IP: Logged

budgie
Member
posted June 23, 2004 23:10     Click Here to See the Profile for budgie     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
this shoudl make you all feel better about cmkx

http://www.verymadden.com/files/Melvin_ft._Sterling_Daryn(Paul_Oakenfold_Remix).zip

IP: Logged

Upside
Member
posted June 23, 2004 23:13     Click Here to See the Profile for Upside     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
Van,
We have to file those in Wisconsin too. $40.00 for absolutely nothing. Do you know if those reports are public record? I'd like to think not as I have a private business and don't really want that information available to just anyone.

IP: Logged

VNGNTN1
Member
posted June 23, 2004 23:15     Click Here to See the Profile for VNGNTN1     Edit/Delete Message   Reply w/Quote
IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THEY ARE PUBLIC.
VAN

IP: Logged


This topic is 53 pages long:   1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53 

All times are ET (US)

next newest topic | next oldest topic

Administrative Options: Close Topic | Archive/Move | Delete Topic
Post New Topic  Post A Reply
Hop to:

Contact Us | Allstocks.com Home Page

© 1997 - 2004 Allstocks.com. All rights reserved.

Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a