|
Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board
![]() Micro Penny Stocks, Penny Stocks Under $0.10
![]() CMKX II new Thread. Get it while you CAN ! (Page 47)
|
This topic is 53 pages long: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 |
next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: CMKX II new Thread. Get it while you CAN ! |
|
Meshoe45 Member |
Every time it closes one low it dips down another .0001 each time. IP: Logged |
|
VNGNTN1 Member |
A reverse split / or a dividend (both rumor)can only affect Authorized shares. The MM will probably need to respond. HOW YOU SAY ? By further shorting in direct opposite proportion to VALUE. VAN [This message has been edited by VNGNTN1 (edited June 23, 2004).] IP: Logged |
|
TradingWizard Member |
quote: Upside, I do remember your explanation, it was on the other thread and thank you for that and for this repeat explantion. I guess I got a little concerned with GFYF split 1:250, but now that a re-read it again this morning I realized that I misunderstood some of the statements. ------------------ [This message has been edited by TradingWizard (edited June 23, 2004).] IP: Logged |
|
pennywise Member |
Why did I buy shares of CMKX? I bought shares of CMKX for the potential that I could make money, lots of money! Anyone interested in understanding the great potential of CMKX just has to look at the map of the exploration properties at Fort a la Corne area. Start by looking at the areas owned by De Beers and their partners. Just see the number of kemberlite pipes that have been discovered and remember that.... Now look at the claims that Casavant Minings owns and just imagine how many undiscovered diamond bearing kimberlite pipes must exist in this area. The growth potential for CMKX is huge! Ultimately you must decide for yourselves... IP: Logged |
|
HitMe101 Member |
Holding steady for the most part,I think they are pushing the impatient ones out & the swingers.This is a long term thing if ya want make anything. IP: Logged |
|
cool1sh Member |
http://cbs.marketwatch.com/news/newsfinder/pulseone.asp?dateid=38161.4281597222-815435292&doctype=806&siteid=mktw&selCount=20&value=Maggie+McNeil+&property=word& SEC approves rule to curb short selling abuses By Maggie McNeil IP: Logged |
|
makemerich Member |
when might we see an effect (if much at all) from the SEC rule? IP: Logged |
|
WWJD-thru-me Member |
cool1ish-This is for short selling. What about naked short selling of OTC stocks? Hopefully they will address this. It is unbelievable how blatant it is and how much it hurts both businesses and shareholders. I am barely trading OTC stocks now. I have lots of shares in many companies already that I am holding and will sell at profit and I will occasionally buy some at the bottom anticipating a move but most of the micro stocks are not selling near their value. But even with good news it is hard to be inspired to buy when the stock barely hiccups before the short selling occurs. Some stocks are overvalued and/or are garbage. Some that have good news, good PR's and Momo are tanked. CMKX appeals to me because I think the issue of covering the huge short position will be forced and it will happen soon. If the MM's reap what they sow they are in for a heap of hurt. GLTA-IMO-Debi IP: Logged |
|
will Member |
I swore off of this thread since Paul pulled his stunt of 'I know something, but can't tell ya' However, I guess my conviction isn't that strong, and I just have to ask. If that is how a sample report is suppose to look, then why didn't CMKX's look like that? quote: IP: Logged |
|
DeadSurf Member |
hey everyone...i got this email yesterday...it's simply one of those email spam ads i think but it talks of a company sinlar to cmkx...i post it on here for you guys to read and see what everyone thinks about it in relation to our cmkx. -------------------------------------------- Advertisement * 20 miles to the northwest, Ashton Mining has uncovered 900 * To the southeast, DeBeers, the world's largest diamond * And right in the middle of this region a small company owns
Dear Investor, My name is James DiGeorgia, Editor of the authoritative Gold & Energy Unknown junior exploration companies yielded staggering returns for * Aber Diamond which saw its stock soar from $1.50 to over $40. * Dia Met Minerals discovered the Ekati diamond deposit and * Winspear Resources was bought out by DeBeers in June of 2000 - These now very successful diamond companies were right in the middle And right now, on the other side of Hudson Bay, in the Otish Mountains One exploration company, the Otish Mountain Diamond Company (symbol I'm about to tell you why a small investment in this company could pay Aber Diamond In 1992 this company was a Canadian junior diamond exploration company If you had invested $10,000 in Aber Diamond in 1991 you would have Tiffany's invested $100 million in Aber Diamond and after only a few Aber Diamond is now one of the world's largest diamond producers. They Dia Met Minerals The Canadian diamond boom, which began in the late 1990s with the One of these firms was Dia Met Minerals Ltd., which discovered the Dia Met was a small Canadian junior exploration company just like If you had invested $10,000 in Dia Met Minerals in their early days Winspear Resources In June 2000, DeBeers bought out Winspear Diamond for 260 million DeBeers paid $4.25 per share - a 77% premium per share over the If you had invested $10,000 in 1997 you would have been bought out Demand Outstrips Supply The price of diamonds has shown robust growth ever since the Canadian For my full report and no obligation (no credit card needed) Click Here: http://d3xo01.jda003.net/cgi-bin/link.pl?id=0068
Mr. DiGeorgia, founding editor of Gold & Energy Advisor, is one of IP: Logged |
|
Upside Member |
originally posted by TradingWizard: quote: TW, IP: Logged |
|
WinsumLosesum Member |
Thanks, DeadSurf. I liked the part that says: "And while the company's shares may be selling for peanuts now, They're trading @ .45 right now. Man, I'd like CMKX to be trading for "peanuts", too!
quote: IP: Logged |
|
PAUL Member |
I will be glad to e-mail it to you also if you would like, just like I offered yesterday. I have sent it to about five people yesterday and today. None of them have posted it ither. If you want it, send me an e-mail and I will send it to you. Then PLEASE, if you want, post it. I have explained my reasons enough. I would appreciate it if you would stop with the digs toward me. I assure you, I can not stand conflict. I feel like I have been bickering with you about this since yesterday. All I asked for was some help with some DD. Then you start making a big deal out of it. Again if you want it e-mail me and I will send it to you. Again it is no big deal. Again if you want to post it please do. But I would hope that you would consider NOT posting it on a public forum until you or someone can verify if it has anything to do with CMKX. PAUL
quote: [This message has been edited by PAUL (edited June 23, 2004).] IP: Logged |
|
emunahstock Member |
Hey guys. I am still in this very big. Haven't sold any of my possition since .0001 I hope you are picking up some more shares at these prices. We are way undervalued at this point, just keep reminding yourself this through all the marketmaker covering. WE ARE WAY UNDERVALUED! IP: Logged |
|
will Member |
No thank you. Just the implication of how it was done was irresponisible. I have since seen it, it was 4 year old trash that if posted had no relevance. I don't care to discuss it any further, and won't bring to the public's attention again. I apologize if I caused you stress, but maybe we should all think of the impact a post might have on others. A lot of gung ho and negative crap is posted about this stock. If you dare ask anyone to explain their position you're either pumping or bashing. The pumpers seem to violate their responsiblity of fair and balanced more so than the bashers. When news is vague and ambiguis, it was deliberate, displying Urbans genius. When is bad and detailed it's incomplete and bashing. Just be resposible and fair. IP: Logged |
|
PAUL Member |
I do not have a large position (wish I did) but, what I have are free shares. I think I am holding them pretty strong. Paul IP: Logged |
|
TradingWizard Member |
Paul good answer. Upside thank you for the reverse split explanation :-) [This message has been edited by TradingWizard (edited June 23, 2004).] IP: Logged |
|
emunahstock Member |
The future of this company is very bright and knowone can deny this. We just have to be a bit more patient then planed but I think we will still be suprised and it wouldn't take so long. IP: Logged |
|
will Member |
Nor do I have a large position, but the responsibility of posting is not diminished by the amount of shares you hold. Y'all can't have it both ways, Ambiguity = genius and cunning, and in the next breath, that's how a sample report should look. Well, which is it? quote: [This message has been edited by will (edited June 23, 2004).] IP: Logged |
|
PAUL Member |
My post regarding my position was in respons to the post from EMU.. just above your post. Perhaps I should have quoted it. Sorry for the misunderstanding. Paul
quote: IP: Logged |
|
WWJD-thru-me Member |
Paul, I know you to be a man of incredible integrity in your life and here on the boards. Thanks for all your contributions icluding not posting what you could not verify. -Debi --------------------------------------------- Will-If you want to fight why not find someone who enjoys it? I am kind of scrappy. Did you ever get beat up by a girl before? -Debi Just half kidding. Mellow out a little on this stock. Pretty much everything there is to know about this stock that we are going to know before the company releases more press releases is here. To keep whining that the longs are pumping and if anyone disagrees they are called a basher is a tad disingenuous. If you have something of substance to offer please do so. Thanks IMO-Debi IP: Logged |
|
VNGNTN1 Member |
WILL If you have some extra time, could you disect my previous post @ 10:02 for all the newbies here ? VAN IP: Logged |
|
will Member |
Deb, deb, deb, it is not a fight I am spoilong for neither with you nor Paul. I only ask how can y'all have things both ways? There isn't any whining here. I am just looking for fair and balanced. Van do your own interpretation. quote: IP: Logged |
|
VNGNTN1 Member |
KINDA WHAT I THOUGHT ! IP: Logged |
|
will Member |
Oh, you embarrassed me because I can't translate your double speak? Because I don't know/understand the implaications of that, I should not have an opinion about obvious inconsistancies? Is that what you're saying? quote: [This message has been edited by will (edited June 23, 2004).] IP: Logged |
|
WWJD-thru-me Member |
Will wrote: knee-hi-boot-gurl: Someone can come here with a signed note from Jesus telling me to sell , and I wouldn't pay any attention to it. I have made up my mind this is either going to go to the .XX in the next few months, or be worthless, or stagering around in the .00X's. Makes no difference at this point. Keep this in mind, read the company's PR's and base your decision on that, not some halfassed, ambigous comment design to unerve you. I don't care who makes the comment stock God, Guru, Superstar...I have made up my mind to make up my OWN mind regarding this one. --------------------------------------------- Will, Will, Will, I have been consistent in my posts about this stock. I bought some early thinking the mineral rights they purchased had some value and they would eventually hit diamonds with all the kimberlite they have. I bought more after believing that there is a huge Naked short position in this and more still once I realized the company is addressing this in a win for the shareholders kind of way. Is this a risky investment? Yes, Do I think it has the ability to crumble? Of course, but I don't think this price decrease we are seeing is related to CMKX's lack of potential or anything negative about them. I see this as a validation of the short postition which has to be covered by the MM's. I am hoping the company and it's law firm will finalize the filing paperwork and give us the information we are all waiting for. Until then the MM's are able to buy any shares they can shake out cheap. It is obvious they sat on the price when Billions of buyers were tripping over each other to buy. The press release about the diamonds that spooked some investors didn't rattle me at all. I was disappointed with it but I think it may have been a partial release to get our Canadian partners trading. Since it was negative anyway why not release a totally negative sample report? Why only a partial? My take on this is there is more positive in there which will be released with the share structure, naked short position, partnerships, financial agreements, additional finds and any other news the company has for us. GLTY,GLTA-IMO-DD-Debi IP: Logged |
|
will Member |
........and I stand by that. I haven't sold a single share, and don't intend to, and if it goes to .0003 my current avg buy I will purchase more. That wasn't/isn't the issue. I neiter pumped nor bashed. I asked, (without being personal and assigning it to anyone person), how can the same information be interpreted two different ways. That is all I was asking. Seeing a post whether by design or accident unnerved people, I challenged it, and it wasn't cleared up where posted. One doesnot have to understand quantum physics to see these things. I asked for an explanation and didn't get one. I am with you as far as CMKX is concerned, I just want to understand how things can be interpreted for convenience. quote: IP: Logged |
|
Meshoe45 Member |
The last 2 minutes of the day CMKX always drops to the low of the day. ERRRR ![]() IP: Logged |
|
will Member |
I show a .0005 close. quote: IP: Logged |
|
VNGNTN1 Member |
WILL Who will CMKX sell diamonds to when mined ? VAN IP: Logged |
|
Doji say what!! Member |
quote: de beers of course!!! they are the only buyers 78,500,000 holding later IP: Logged |
|
VNGNTN1 Member |
DOJI I know "read whole article". WILL has a lot to say and challenges others, just thought I could entice some original thought. VAN IP: Logged |
|
VNGNTN1 Member |
DOJI I know "read whole article". WILL has a lot to say and challenges others, just thought I could entice some original thought. Ran across this author in a completely different research project. He must get around. VAN IP: Logged |
|
cool1sh Member |
From IHUB..
I'm going to ask you to step outside of your normal box of thinking. Step into the shoes of a brokerage house that has made a mistake. Now in the past, their strategy has worked 98 out of 100 times to make them disgusting amounts of money. The 2 times it has failed, they were still able to get out with only moderate losses. To them this has been a slam dunk virtually every time. But this time, they actually have made a mistake that has started to concern them. If you're still in the camp about "I don't believe naked shorts even exist" then you need to read www.thefaulkingtruth.com and you need to start getting a clue about what is happening. So back to our brokerage house with a problem. What do you do if you are them? You have choices. Choice number one is to start covering as quickly as possible. Let's see, that will tip your hand to every other market maker as well as generate further buying momentum from traders and momentum players. All of this could spiral upwards so rapidly that you could be completely and totally annihilated. Hmmmmm, gonna have to pass on that option. Assessment: VERY RISKY. Choice number two is to try and hold the stock down just a little but keep ticking it up SLOWLY so that you can cover at each successive price level and average your way out of this situation. Now the problem with that is that market psychology won't cooperate. If the stock keeps going UP, ironically, more and more people keep buying and fewer are willing to sell because "hey, it's still going up." Eventually, enough buying is now coming in that you just can't cover all that well. Hmmmm, doesn't seem like a good option either. Assessment: PRETTY RISKY. Choice number three. Let's get back to old school basics. Fear and impatience. The harder we can drop this, the more frustrated longs will get. This stock is no different than the other hundreds we've crushed before. So-called "longs" are looking to retire by next week and if this stock is down 50% since they bought it, they will get weak in the knees QUICKLY. It has ALWAYS worked and it WILL work in this case. Plus, we have the added bonus of a law firm that is probably going to give us a large window time frame with which to inflict maximum pain on the share price. Law firms are notoriously known to slow things down and with all the clamoring for a press release, the longer it goes without one, the more shares we can shake out without any risk of rising momentum. Let's see how much pain these shareholders can take. Let's see just HOW long they'll last. Hey, if it fails, we still have options 1 and 2. But this is WORTH exploring. Plus, the other market makers are following our lead. They aren't about to go long on this if they sense that the selling is going to continue. This is a good, solid game plan that has no downside compared to the other two options. Assessment: MINIMAL RISK (ONLY COMPANY PR COULD CAUSE FAILURE) That in my opinion is what is happening. In the past, they have won this way every time. In the past, the companies have been so brutalized by these tactics that they can only muster up a weak, feeble defense to which the shorts slap back down pretty quickly. The media reinforcements are called in when they need a little extra push. Usually that's a sign that the short selling is not going as QUICKLY as they have planned. But the media push helps accelerate that. Now query a few things: How many times in the past have the companies the shorts tanked been able to get a world-class law firm to step in on their behalf? Answer: None. Shorts know that when a company is on the ropes with its share price, the company can barely afford anything, let alone solid legal expertise. We have the legal firepower to combat this. Shorts have not encountered this before. Why are there negative bashing articles appearing for a stock at .0004? This is a stock in the hundredths of a penny. Most of the articles that ever come out from the shorts are to bash down stocks sometimes in the dollars, sometimes in the .70s to .80s, but at .0004??????? Why are reinforcements being brought in at this level? Answer: Help is needed. And FAST. How many times in the past have people had this much of a free ride? Usually, this game isn't played at the .0001 level. But for some reason they got a little cocky here. Then it blew up in such a way that a TON of people were able to get "free rides" by selling off their initial investment. Before the shorts were even able to lob a counterattack, these people already had their money off the table. Instead of sitting back "scared" of losing their investment, they are simply waiting. The "Fear Factor" is gone on a very large percentage of shareholders. How do shorts combat this? Answer: Don't know. Haven't really seen it before. This is a tough one.
Notice how gloomy all the boards appear today. This is exactly how the shorts want it. Oh, sure, we can't PROVE that anyone is shorting and bashers will incessantly claim that "Urban is printing shares" but, hmmm, they can't prove that either. Naked shorting is the perfectly cloaked crime since the market makers can make the situation appear to be as dark as they'd like and nobody truly knows why. Notice more longs suddenly admitting to "selling a few shares just to cover my initial investment." Actually, at these prices if 100% of people sold to "cover their initial investment", the shorts might get covered on a HUGE percent of their short. Now THAT'S a goal working towards. Maximum pain is their only option right now. Giving this stock a fear factor of 10 is their ultimate goal. They will do this for as long as they can because their only other options are even more unappetizing. Shorts have the upper hand TODAY. But that is only because they do not KNOW what is coming. Granted we don't either, but I feel VERY comfortable saying that thanks to our new law firm, it will NOT be handled in a way that 99.9% of every other pink or otc stock has combatted the problem. I have been through this kind of pain many, many times with other otcs. I knew this would happen but was still not willing to risk anything for a quick trade. I do believe this is the opportunity of a lifetime and I'm not willing to be caught outside of my trade at the precise moment when something breaks loose. I've accumulated slowly and at a full average of about .00055. I'm comfortable with that position even if I lose 60% of my investment on paper FIRST before it turns around. THAT is the only way in my opinion to play these pennies. THAT is why you will hear so many people that have been burned before say "scam" as soon as you try telling them about a pink sheet. It is a TOUGH place to make money and you can bet that with CMKX, it's going to be the TOUGHEST place of all. Good luck to all. I am exhausted after writing this. LOL Don't know if it helped anyone at all, but when I have thoughts I jot them down. Hopefully more often than not, they're worth reading. LOL Z IP: Logged |
|
cool1sh Member |
Was Melvin on IBC today? I got this from RB.. This is what he said "He and UC are workin' 24x7 Anyone heard? IP: Logged |
|
WinsumLosesum Member |
quote: Good find, cool. Sounds good to me. IP: Logged |
|
Doji say what!! Member |
CLICK ON THIS GREAT CHARTING AND DETAILS ON CMKX!!!! http://cmkx.proboards34.com/index.cgi?board=general&action=display&num=1088025474 IP: Logged |
|
tahoechris Member |
someone on another board contacted the transfer agent, and apparantly cmkx only has 700 shareholders, that seems like a real good number to me. also said everything should be available in 1 to 2 weeks..IP: Logged |
|
pharmdman Member |
quote: don't forget. "street" shares from electronic shareholders/brokers (i.e., Ameritrade, etrade, etc.) count as one shareholder each. Unless you've asked for and received actual stock certificates, you're not counted. IP: Logged |
|
STAR GAZER Member |
cool1sh you mentioned that people have been burned playing pink sheet stocks and so say scam when they see one touted. You also say that pink sheet stocks are a tough place to make money. I LOVE PINK SHEET STOCKS. That's where I have had my greatest winners. If a person researches the stocks, they can find a lot of great stocks. And, just as in CMKX, they have to sit back and wait, maybe acquire free shares. All it takes is a few big winners to overcome the losers that you will have. And boy, are there some BIG WINNERS in this group. And anyway, playing the penny and micropenny stocks is fun. IP: Logged |
|
prdponce Member |
Have anyone seen this one. Interesting. By: pedro20040 I ordered copies of the complete Nevada Secretary of State corporate filings for CMKM Diamonds, Inc. (CMKX) and Casavant International Mining (CIM). My intent was to somehow estimate the O/S Shares of CMKX. **** URBAN CASAVANT CAROLYN CASAVANT EMMERSON KOCH Let us look at what we do know. Last SEC 10Q Filing September 30, 2002 Stockholders' equity Preferred stock, authorized 3,000,000 shares at $.001 par value, issued and outstanding one (1) share. We are looking at 500,000,000 shares authorized DEF 14C filed 02/03/2003 Outstanding Voting Stock of the Company In order to effectuate the merger with the Casavant Mineral Claims, the majority shareholders' holding more than 51% of the voting shares approved an increase in the authorized capital of the Company from 500,000,000 to 10,000,000,000 with the cancellation of all Preferred shares. Prior to this action, the Company had 3,000,000 Preferred shares purchased by the majority shareholders in 2001 for $235,000 from the Jarvis Entertainment Group, Inc., thereby giving them voting control of the Company. On November 25, 2002, the Company's shares were valued at $0.0014 and the Casavant Mineral Claims were valued at over $10,000,000 in situ, but did not include pre-claims exploration, consulting and other expenses incurred (the "Additional Claims Expenses"). These Additional Claims Expenses were valued at $3,000,000 at the time of the merger. As of the Record Date, there were 7,241,653,404 shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding. The Common Stock constitutes the outstanding class of voting securities of the Company. Each share of Common Stock entitles the holder to one (1) vote on all matters submitted to the shareholders. Total authorized shares 10,000,000,000: Total issued and outstanding shares as of January 15, 2003 was 7,241,653,404 common shares SEC S-8 filed 05/02/2003 Item 1. Plan Information The Company is offering shares of its common stock to various individuals for consulting services on the Company's behalf. This issuance of shares is being made pursuant to consulting agreements between the Company and the individuals. The Company has equated this number of shares to the value of the consulting services provided or to be provided by these individuals. The shares issued hereunder will not be subject to any resale restrictions. The following individuals will receive the number of shares listed next to their names: James Kenny 530,000,000 Total authorized shares 10,000,000,000: Total issued and outstanding shares as of May 2, 2003 was 8,301,653,404 common shares Stock Split Capital Change=shs increased by 2 for 1 split. Ex-date=09/30/2003. Rec date=09/30/2003. Pay date=09/30/2003. This is where it gets a little tricky. We know that there was a 2-1 stock split. So basing on assumption, we multiply our authorized and issued shares by 2. Total authorized shares 20,000,000,000: Total issued and outstanding shares as of May 2, 2003 was 16,603,306,808 Let us now go back to a press release on December 17, 2003. Casavant Mining Kimberlite International Announces That the Company Has Officially Retired 16.5 Billion Shares Back to the Treasury ///// Issued shares was 16,603,306,808 from above. Total authorized shares 20,000,000,000: Total issued and outstanding shares as of December 17, 2003 was 100,829,608. Here is a second press release on January 9, 2004. Casavant Mining Kimberlite International Announces Retirement of 1.8 Billion Shares ///// How can CMKX retire 1.8 billion shares when there are only 100,829,608 million shares outstanding? _________________________________________________ I am not finished. I ordered some documents from Nevada. My credit card was charges 2 days ago. I did not receive the documents yesterday (06/22/2004). Hopefully today. As soon as I receive the documents from Nevada, I will update this post. I wanted to get this up so no one gets scared and starts selling IP: Logged |
|
joeyisthebest Member |
hi nice post hope that nobody sells because this is the oppertunity of your lifetime and mine. No one will ever see a stock run like this will when the audit comes out. IP: Logged |
|
cool1sh Member |
Did I? Are you sure?
quote: IP: Logged |
|
Upside Member |
prdponce, Your post can be tracked up until the 12/17/03 part. By that time they were not a non-reporting company. There authorized could have been any number they wanted it to be. I believe it is now a known fact that the authorized is 500 billion. While I'm not saying this happened, they could have retired those 16 billion then turned around and printed and sold 32 billion. No documents from Nevada will give the total outstanding number. It is a number only known to the corporate insiders. The documents from Nevada will only give you the last publicly reported number. If there are in fact all 500 billion outstanding it's a number that simply boggles the mind. If its true there is no hope of this stock doing anything. If however the number comes out in Debi's range estimate, 10 - 30 billion, while still a staggering amount, it's a number they can possibly do something with. IP: Logged |
|
chshore Member |
I thought they said the new site would be up EARLY next week? Its MID next week and still no new site. What gives? IP: Logged |
|
VNGNTN1 Member |
UPSIDE That may not be true. Illinois may be different than Nevada but I have to file a document each year with the state with all change in capitalization.(Domestic Corporation Annual Report) VAN [This message has been edited by VNGNTN1 (edited June 23, 2004).] IP: Logged |
|
sdrobert Member |
I was told I cant start a new post thats lame I think a smasher replied to my thread!!! IP: Logged |
|
budgie Member |
this shoudl make you all feel better about cmkx http://www.verymadden.com/files/Melvin_ft._Sterling_Daryn(Paul_Oakenfold_Remix).zip IP: Logged |
|
Upside Member |
Van, We have to file those in Wisconsin too. $40.00 for absolutely nothing. Do you know if those reports are public record? I'd like to think not as I have a private business and don't really want that information available to just anyone. IP: Logged |
|
VNGNTN1 Member |
IT IS MY UNDERSTANDING THEY ARE PUBLIC. VAN IP: Logged |
This topic is 53 pages long: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 All times are ET (US) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
![]() |
|
© 1997 - 2004 Allstocks.com. All rights reserved.
Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a