|
 Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board
 Micro Penny Stocks, Penny Stocks Under $0.10
 CMKX II new Thread. Get it while you CAN ! (Page 41)
|
 UBBFriend: Email This Page to Someone! This topic is 53 pages long: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 |
next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: CMKX II new Thread. Get it while you CAN ! |
|
joeyisthebest Member |
posted June 20, 2004 15:37
  
Wallace please stop trying to make this stock look bad. Are you blind look they are working to get share value up. Why would they want to become fully reporting if they knew it would ruin their company? They found diamonds in their first drilling that is unbeleivable IMO. I can't wait for the real diamond samples that were locked away to get tested then when the results are in we should fly. still very good chance of us striking it rich. Their is too many good things which can happen to this company than bad IMO. Wallace please look at the facts the law firm is a huge clue and becomeing fully reporting. You tell me how this can be bad from the law firm and fully reporting. If it makes good sense then I might sell but untill then shut up and let the peace stay on this thread. Good bye GO CMKX IP: Logged |
|
Doji say what!! Member |
posted June 20, 2004 15:49
Wallace one in 6 BILLION we are going to take the risk... thanks anyway the point is: so your argument is STUPID! we will never know the answers to most of thouse questions about CMKX ever it's a pink = risk. but does that MEAN WE CAN'T MAKE MONEY.....NO WALLACE ONE IN 6 BILLION YOU ACT LIKE A RB BASHER AND I HAVE BATTLED THERE DUMB ASS'S AND ALLWAYS WON. WHY BEACUSE IN THE END THE PPS GOES UP!!!!! ARE YOU LOST rb is to the left..... THIS IS ALLSTOCKS WE DON'T WANT YOUR NEGATIVE DOUGHT THROWING BASHING HERE! DAVE OR OFFSHORETRADER CAN YOU BAN THIS FOOL!!! HE IS NOT HELPING OUR DD!!!! AT ALL IP: Logged |
|
Earth_Shaker Member |
posted June 20, 2004 16:23
WALLACE your NEGATIVITY is UNCALLED for !!!! WHY WOULD A CORPORATION SEEK TO BE FULLY REPORTING and LIST on the OTCBB if they were a SCAM. WHY WOULD URBAN RETIRE SHARES if they were a SCAM. Its easier to ISSUE new Shares then retire them and very profitable for URBAN. SO WHY RETIRE THEM. GEE MAYBE TO BECOME LEGITIMATE and remove the PINK STATUS so CMKX CAN MOVE FORWARD and become a DIAMOND force to be RECOGNIZED. WHY WOULD CMKX RETAIN A TOP NOTCH LAW FIRM if they were a SCAM. Any Corporation on Pink Sheet Status could USE any JOE SCHMOE law Firm to move to OTCBB. URBAN IS USING the BEST. HMMMM think about that one !!!! WHY WOULD URBAN SECURE 1.4 MILLION ACRES FOR DIAMOND EXPLORATION if they were a SCAM. IF THIS WERE A SCAM I THINK JUST ONE PIPE WOULD BE EnOUgh TO FLEECE the PUBLIC with. 1.4 MILLION ACRES is SIMPLY AMAZING. VERY VALUABLE. AND WITHOUT EVEN DRILLING 1.4 MILLION ACRES IS VERY VALUABLE> HMMMM !! WHY ARE INSTITUTIONS INVESTING IN THIS COMPANY to the TUNE of more then 40% if CMKX is a SCAM URBAN HAS THE RIGHT TO ISSUE 500 BILLION SHARES. WHY IS HE RETIRING THEM INSTEAD OF ISSUEING MORE if CMKX is a SCAM WHY WOULD CMKX TAKE ON PARTNERS if this were a scam DONT YOU THINK THE PARTNERS WOULD STEER CLEAR> PARTNERS ONLY COMMIT MONEY AND TIME AND MACHINERY IF THERE TRUELY IS VALUE IN CMKX's DIAMOND STAKE. I PERSONALLY WOULD NOT JOIN CMKX AS A PARTNER UNLESS URBAN SHOWED ME SOMETHING that GOT MY ATTENTION "DIAMONDS" WALLACE -GO AWAY- YOUR A BASHER FROM RAGINGBULL. IP: Logged |
|
kguts11 Member |
posted June 20, 2004 16:35
No one but the guy who bashes everything positive even hinted at. Couldn't let it go, could you. You are just way too obvious, but I guess I just made you a few bucks, didn't I. You win after all. have a good night. Kev
quote: IP: Logged |
|
Wallace#1 Member |
posted June 20, 2004 16:40
Doji, Now you want to ban someone for voicing an opinion and supporting that opinion with facts and truths instead of the rumors you so prefer. Sounds like a WITCH HUNT to me. Who's gathering the sticks to burn me at the stake? Not you Doji, you'll let someone else waste their time doing that so you can dwell on more rumors. I have never been on RB nor even gone there, BUT OBVIOUSLY YOU HAVE. You call all the rumor mongering DD? LMAO IT SURE DOES LOOK LIKE A FEW OTHER KNOWLEDGEABLE PEOPLE ALSO FEEL THAT THIS IS A SCAM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! [This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited June 20, 2004).] IP: Logged |
|
pharmdman Member |
posted June 20, 2004 16:45
quote: You ask, "Wonder why?" I say, "There was no need for a response to speculation; nothing referenced by you was DD. OilMan I do not know, and Dardadog I no longer trust." You ask, "Fear?" I say, "No, I've done my homework and I'm okay with my risk. However, thank you for your concern." IP: Logged |
|
Earth_Shaker Member |
posted June 20, 2004 16:46
All PENNY STOCKS have THAT SCAM FEEL to THEM. Thats why they are PENNY STOCKS. BUT the REWARDS sometimes Outweigh the RISK. NEVER invest with MONEY that YOU are unable TO lose. I have made MUCH MONEY with PENNY STOCKS. And I am GOING to make a ton more ON THIS ONE. $$$$$$$ CMKX is going to make us RICHER. Regardless of PUMPERS or BASHERS. GO CMKX "CMKX ROCKS" Earth_Man IP: Logged |
|
Wallace#1 Member |
posted June 20, 2004 17:07
Pharmdman, Now you really have me angry!!! Still I will not resort to all your name calling. If there is anyone on all of Allstocks you can trust it is Dardadog!!!!!!! However, on this thread, there a many "pumpers" you cannot trust. IP: Logged |
|
noahltl New Member |
posted June 20, 2004 17:46
The fact that CMKX's Vegas offices are closed does not cause me concern. That's the city of their incorporation and they need to maintain some sort of office there. For me, if my diamonds are in Canada---- my office is in Canada, because that's where I'm going to be. Found this post on another site. Good read if you're if you're feeling and doubts. IP: Logged |
|
Wallace#1 Member |
posted June 20, 2004 17:50
Here's another one! Dardadog, on p.39 of this thread, stated he has been trying to retrieve shs pursuant to a 2for1 split...that is if I understood his post correctly. That suggests that he is trying to get physical possession of the stock certificates. Whenever someone buys stock and does not take (request and get) physical possession the stock stays in what is called "street name" which means it is there under the broker's name...not yours. Call your broker(s), spend a few dollars ($25-$50) to try to get physical possession of your CMKX stocks!!!! Bet you won't get them! IP: Logged |
|
noahltl New Member |
posted June 20, 2004 17:53
Don't be too concerned about the empty office in Vegas. This the city of their incorporation, and they have to keep an office there for legal compliance reasons. As for me, if my diamonds are in Canada, .... my office is in Canada, because that's where I'm going to be. Found this interesting post at another site. Makes a great read if you're having any doubts about your investment. CERTAINLY INTERESTING. A bit more research for those interested. Being a lawyer and fairly familiar with large law firm structures, I thought it would be helpful to dissect Edwards Angell. It certainly proved even more interesting than I expected. The reason I did this was because no matter how many times I toy with the facts (or lack of facts), I keep coming back to one question: why did Urban choose a heavy hitter law firm and why specifically Edwards Angell and why specifically Roger Glenn? Edwards Angell is based primarily out of Boston, but with a strong presence in Providence and New York. They are generally seen as a "Northeastern" law firm however, rather than a "New York" law firm. Which is where it gets interesting. Their New York office houses 44 attorneys. Of the 44 attorneys, Roger is the only partner that truly specializes in corporate securities. In fact, in total there are only about 4 partners in the New York office that I would even say qualify at all as Securities Partners, with the other 3 clearly having focuses in niche markets on securities (foreign acquisitions, insurance companies, and ERISA). In terms of general securities, financings, M&A, and filings, Roger is the MAN in the New York office. This is signficant. You do not have a presence in New York as a large law firm without making sure that your New York office is the absolute BEST that it can be in the securities department. With the proximity to the exchanges, Wall Street and all the financial business in New York, this is truly the "prestige" office. And Roger is THE guy. Breaking it down further, pay close attention to the publication that he authored in 2003. Its focus is the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002. That Act is a set of some of the most complex securities laws ever passed to ensure proper corporate accountability and governance in companies after the Enron and Worldcom scandals, specifically with respect to filings and dealings with the SEC. I hope this is starting to sink in. To be selected to write an authoritative text on interpreting this Act is a testament to the respect, expertise and integrity that Roger possesses in this field. Now think more about our situation. When it comes to proper filings, navigating the complexities of SEC/filings, and doing it all ABOVE BOARD and with maximum ACCOUNTABILITY, Roger is simply one of the best attorneys perhaps in New York to fit this role. Let me remind you. He is THE man in their New York office. Not one of dozens of partners. THE man. Now many might be thinking (and surely the bashers will be all over this) "maybe Urban did something wrong and needs Roger to bail him out". First, the press releases expressly stated Roger will "help them become fully reporting" which is quite different than than any corporate wrongdoing. Second, Edwards Angell has a "Corporate White Collar Crime" division specifically. Roger is not listed as one of the 16 attorneys with any expertise in that area. My opinion is that it is 99.9% unlikely that Roger would be involved with anything in that area when there are 16 other attorneys that specialize in that area at the firm. I'd also like to wrap into this that Edwards Angell is probably among a handful (probably among the top 10 in the country) of firms that specialize in venture capital and private equity financing. I cannot say how this may work into the equation but what I can say with confidence is that VC people at THIS level would not touch anything without complete and total due diligence and confidence in an emerging company. If in fact there is any additional financing (a secondary? a group willing to fund a move to get an asset base high enough to qualify for NYSE or AMEX listing?), this is THE firm to handle it professionally and with maximum benefit to shareholders and the company. So let's connect the dots. If you were simply looking to perpetuate CMKX and sell shares into the market, why would you do all this, particularly when "fully reporting" would now mean full disclosure on all transactions? And why in the world if there were any "problems" would you hire the guy that wrote the book on strict corporate procedures and guidelines with respect to filings? And this is where I ponder heavily ... Why Roger and Edwards Angell? Why would you pick the New York office's top securities guy, the firm's top SEC filings guy to handle your "fully reporting" status? And why would ROGER who assuredly as their top securities guy (particularly the one that PUBLISHED a legal primer on corporate accountability and integrity) EVER take on a pink sheet company when basically his entire livelihood would take on about the largest black eye possible if ANYTHING fraudulent were involved. I know I'm rambling. Thanks for listening. A few other points. Roger specializes in Mergers & Acquisitions and was the only attorney I found listing "going private transactions" among his specialties. He also was CLEARLY the most recognized partner with respect to filing and becoming a public, reporting company. And being the MAIN guy in the New York office, something became lucidly obvious in thinking all this through .... and keep in mind this is just one attorneys subjective analysis of all this ... Urban has something so big and unique that not only does it require securities legal expertise of the highest level but it specifically requires that it be handled by someone who stands out in the ethics and integrity department as well. In other words, when all is available to the public, there should be an additional "protection" in everything in knowing that it was processed, approved and filed through an attorney with IMPECCABLE credentials. The fact that Roger Glenn published a legal treatise on Corporate Responsibility following the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 is SIGNIFICANT. It essentially means that if Roger blesses what has transpired, it is meeting the HIGHEST standards of corporate responsibility. And if what I believe Urban is bringing to the table through Roger is what it is, this will be CRITICAL. To recap: I am 99.9% comfortable with dismissing the notion that Roger was brought on due to anything negative or to "bail out" Urban. And all this leads me to the conclusion that this is no mere "get me trading on the otc bulletin board situation". No, my (endless) rambling above leads me to believe that this must be a situation of MONUMENTAL significance. I am sorry this took so long to type. I hope people found it helpful. I have harped on the significance of this firm and man from day one. I felt it important to expand upon why this is the single most important hint to everything that has transpired so far. Good night and please have a wonderful Father's Day to all the dads out there. Hopefully next year for Father's Day, everyone will be considerably better off in life thanks to this investment. Take care.
IP: Logged |
|
noahltl New Member |
posted June 20, 2004 18:01
Sorry about the double post above, computer went on the "fritz" for a few minutes. IP: Logged |
|
TruthTeller Member |
posted June 20, 2004 18:12
This basher thinks he is a free stock adviser for newbies. Fact is he was a loser on wall street. Bye bye Basher#1!! [This message has been edited by TruthTeller (edited June 20, 2004).] IP: Logged |
|
JBCak47 Member |
posted June 20, 2004 18:27
Wallace, If you dont like the stock, sell and move on. That is it. This thread is for people who are POSITIVE about the stock. Second, I have not really seen you around other than this thread. You certainly aren't posting on the QBID thread, if so I have missed it. You don't seem to be very smart and I hope others see this as well. You may think you are important and doing us a favor, but the best thing you could do is just go away. No one really cares about what you think. IP: Logged |
|
CB Member |
posted June 20, 2004 18:46
Alls I have to say to this thread agoing a bunk is that I bought 5,700,000 @ .0005 = $2850.00 cash! I don't care if it goes back to .0001 or not! I see resistance at .0005 and highs of .0012,I forsee good news comeing and the Investment part of this growing a gain. I have a position in life that yeilds me $1250 every 2 weeks pretaxed.This is money from lets just say from a fund.*!* This does not include my other incomes from any job related workings,I solely dedicate a minimum to $3000.00 a month to Investing... Now I have been to my local casinos and placed $100.00 on high / low and $500 in the feild and had two 1's come up @the craps table... So for me to have my time wasted going through BS is really anoying... These threads are for the growth forward of a given stock...So I say if the majority does not want to here your piticular input than maybe to who ever it may concern start your own NEW Thread on why you think the stock sucks or will go down in your opinion ,and or why you feel you don't have the money to RISK or your to Brokenly Cheap to warrant a loss @ this junctur in you life Some say this stock is a scam and will not buy @ the current level but then they say they have buy orders in @ beginning levels...?Why would you do that @ all if you thought it was a scam..? There is an obvieoues underlying issue there for those people and the only one I can come up with is they have no room for a loss in there life at the present time.So for those of us that do have room for a loss will take that risk and if it pays off than it will and it will have been all well worth it.. I'm in the markett for a gain and understand I have to take some losses along the way or there would be no leveler in the game and everyone would be a winner! ***MY Disclaimer STATES*** EDIT:..>One more thing here to say is that I appreciate all the DD and positive input members make to these threads here @ Allstocks and on that note we come together and make money in the end if the DD warrants such Investing.. [This message has been edited by CB (edited June 20, 2004).] IP: Logged |
|
Booty Quest Member |
posted June 20, 2004 19:17
Check out this pic from one of Doji's links: http://www.debeerscanada.com/files_2/fort_a_la_corne/photogallery-k.html nuff said... [This message has been edited by Booty Quest (edited June 20, 2004).] IP: Logged |
|
rsnws Member |
posted June 20, 2004 19:30
When I started trading stocks I lost $3000.00 in my first 2 weeks. With CMKX I recoped that lost and than some. So, to whom it may concern, there is nothing anyone can say about CMKX that would convince me to take my money out. As far as this newbie is concerned, you bashers might as well go away. IP: Logged |
|
Az...Cats Member |
posted June 20, 2004 19:44
quote: DIDO!!!! Hey guys, Please don't respond to Wallace. He gets a hard on everytime you respond to him. Just let the poor ******* go. IP: Logged |
|
STAR GAZER Member |
posted June 20, 2004 19:49
Wallace, these are Pink Sheet MICRO penny stocks. why complain that Doji trades the moves. I have been wanting to learn how to do that with out just making wild buy/sell guesses. Doji posts how he does it and I have been putting copies of his posts in my folders. I'm learning a bunch from him. But even more than that, Allstocks is here for people to find good stocks to invest in. We want to find posts that are well thought out and/or have great in depth DD. Truth Teller said it right "welcome to the pink sheets" stocks that don't have stringent reporting requirements, but on the other hand can shoot up (or down) on a rumor. I dont see Humana shares on the NYSE SHOOTING UP 1,200% IN TWO WEEKS. (Oh by the way Booty Quest, who said CMKS 1,200% QBID 28,000% ... PICKY PICKY.) That's why you want to buy them low. But then, as he points out in that, the only word I can think of is 'Magnificient' post on Edwards Angell that CMKX is not your ordinary pink sheet stock. It looks like it is going to be a major stock on a major exchange. And as many others have pointed out we have the greatest land position for kimberlites IN THE WORLD. And in pink sheets you try to find stocks with the best risk/ reward ratio and CMKX leans way over towards the reward part of the ratio. It's nice to point out the negative aspects of a stock, but you also have to give due credit to the positives. Pink sheet stocks by definition are speculative, so even though a healthy negativity will keep people from using their money foolishly, we are in the pink sheets to use some of our SPARE MONEY to make big bucks, and if you over do the negativity with out also pointing out the positives, then you are hurting people by driving them away from a good stock that may help them on their road to riches. As always, people also need to do their own DD. IP: Logged |
|
Doji say what!! Member |
posted June 20, 2004 19:50
By: Varok 18 Jun 2004, 10:11 PM EDT Msg. 9429 of 9448 Jump to msg. # Folks, CMKX has turned the corner and now is under the control of the law firm of Edwards & Angell, LLP.. Anything that gets printed, vetted and disseminated will go through this law firm.. The company is now under the legal firm for corporate protocal and shareholders protection..The umbrella as been fully canopied and is in our favor.. Expect within the next 2 weeks for major announcements..This PR today is a sign of such announcements that really wasn't necessary in the penny arcade..Today's action on the volume and next week is very critical.. Of course this is just my opinion,but exciting times is very near for CMKX.. HOLD for the " Motherload " If you blink, it will pass you by.. Have a good day -------------------------- VAROK IS ON OUR SIDE THAT IS GREAT!!!! IP: Logged |
|
gorforit72545 Member |
posted June 20, 2004 19:54
quote:
Bob IP: Logged |
|
STAR GAZER Member |
posted June 20, 2004 19:57
Which brings me to the point, does anybody have SWAG on how we are going to do this week? ... SWAG: silly dictionary definition: Scientific Wild Ass Quess. IP: Logged |
|
Booty Quest Member |
posted June 20, 2004 20:05
Star Gazer, I wasn't being picky nor was I comparing QBID to CMKX. I was responding to people who called those scams. I would NEVER belittle a 1,200% gain like CMKX just had. If you just put up $10,000 at .0001, you'd be a millionaire when we hit ONE penny!!! I like those odds! IP: Logged |
|
Wallace#1 Member |
posted June 20, 2004 20:16
Well, now folks, I knew that suggestion to demand your certificates from your broker would shake Doji up!!! Why?? Because, if it is a SCAM, that would stop his game really fast. The share price would plummet. Don't think you cannot make such a request. YOU CAN DEMAND IT!! By law, they are required to deliver them to you upon your request. IP: Logged |
|
gorforit72545 Member |
posted June 20, 2004 20:21
quote: Do your own work and ask them for yours. We all know you have plenty of shares already. Don't be such a pig and try and scare these poor newcomers. Be satisfied with what you have. Bob IP: Logged |
|
Doji say what!! Member |
posted June 20, 2004 20:31
THANKS STAR GAZER for the comments see everyone in the am for the L2 lineup... except wallace one in 6 billion
[This message has been edited by Doji say what!! (edited June 20, 2004).] IP: Logged |
|
keithsan Member |
posted June 20, 2004 20:36
quote: I don't write or read these long threads cause of this crap, I've agreed with doji and wallace on certain points..... I have some experience in these types of matters though and dogs issue is not a cmkx one. This company does have some ifs and some history, does have good news recently though..... Don't use the lack of share in hand matter against cmkx. There are issues with brokerage houses and cmkx has issued pr's in regards to this. now back to the cat fight.... IP: Logged |
|
rsnws Member |
posted June 20, 2004 20:38
OK, all you newbies go search the post by Wallace#1 and you will see who he really is. This a very interesting post from him back on 5/10/04. How can he make judgements on CMKX if he is asking question like this. I take it NITE and JEFF are certain MM's. How do you know their ID's? How do you know which stock(s) a MM is handling? How do you know how exactly how many shares are traded each time whether at a lower, equal or higher price? Sure would appreciate an explanation of each!!! IP: Logged |
|
BobTheSlob Member |
posted June 20, 2004 21:00
From the sidelines again....just wanted to clarify that speculation IS NOT due diligence. A few adjustments from other posts: Moving to OTC is speculation, wanting to become a reporting company is not. This is important because if they want to goto NASDAQ or AMEX, an R/S is in the cards. At this point we don't know where they want to go. The retirement of shares is speculation as well. A PR stating that UC has retired shares is not proof that they have been (or still are) retired, and since the OS isnt known, the whole matter is moot (he could have reauthorized/reissued them). Again, just speculation. The property has no value, UC has mineral rights to the property not the property itself. While the minerals in the dirt may be worth $$$$, the plain fact that he has 1.4 million acres of land is irrelevant as far as placing a value on the land itself. The property is not an asset on paper. As I previously pointed out, saying that there is heavy institutional buying is misleading since there are so many varying entities that appear in Thompsons I-Watch service.
If everyone would stick to the facts and not their "interpretation" of them, this would be a much more productive thread. "Can't we just all get along?" Bob IP: Logged |
|
pharmdman Member |
posted June 20, 2004 21:03
quote:
IP: Logged |
|
BB Member |
posted June 20, 2004 21:21
Wallace, in the past 2 weeks I requested stock certificates from Ameritrade ($40 per stock). I got my stock certificate for 2.74 mil. shares of LBTT and it took a little over a week to get it. They said 4 to 6 weeks. So that was really quick. I also got my certificates for CMKX and that took about 2 1/2 weeks for them. On the CMKX certificates they sent me (all certified) 6 different certificates. I have 50 mil. shares of CMKX. Five of the certificates are for 9,999,999 and the 6th one is for 5 shares. Why they do this I don't know. I know at least I can send some back to Ameritrade when I want to cash them in instead of mailing one with all 50 mil. shares on it. So CMKX does issue certificates if you order them. BB IP: Logged |
|
TruthTeller Member |
posted June 20, 2004 21:23
Just ignore basher#1 aka loser#1 GO CMKX IP: Logged |
|
TruthTeller Member |
posted June 20, 2004 21:28
Uh Ohh.. Lets see what Mr.Wall St. says
quote: [This message has been edited by TruthTeller (edited June 20, 2004).] IP: Logged |
|
OilMan Member |
posted June 20, 2004 21:52
LOL! Here is a find....... http://music.download.com/theurbancasavantproject/3600-8363_32-100304067.html IP: Logged |
|
TruthTeller Member |
posted June 20, 2004 21:54
CMKX was not a scam until Jun 10th and it can go to 0020. But its a scam now? http://www.allstocks.com/stockmessageboard/ubb/Forum8/HTML/007438-7.html
quote: [This message has been edited by TruthTeller (edited June 20, 2004).] IP: Logged |
|
Upside Member |
posted June 20, 2004 21:58
originally posted by TruthTeller: quote: IP: Logged |
|
pharmdman Member |
posted June 20, 2004 22:02
Wallace, I don't know how you'd know anything about how valuable some has or has not been, since last month you didn't even know what an MM was, who NITE & JEFF were, or how an L2 worked. But suddenly, you're an expert on who is the most valuable and trusted on here? There are many people on here that are willing to help others and offer sound advice; not just one person. And the person to whom you refer left many people hanging with a shady, and still, unexplained post. I have nothing personally against him, but I believe that he did everyone a disservice. Therefore, I do not trust him. I can't help but wonder how you know so much about him. Either you're new and gullable to believe everything you hear about someone, or you're pretending to be new and you accidentally tipped your hand. IP: Logged |
|
highwaychild Member |
posted June 20, 2004 22:07
quote: IP: Logged |
|
noahltl New Member |
posted June 20, 2004 22:09
BASHERS HANDBOOK LESSON 5: (in part) They rely on you being to lazy to research their droppings other than to scan the board for others opinions. This is particularly dangerous when you consider that Bashers work in packs and often validate and back up each others nonsense with what appears to be "innocuous and unsolicited" verification by comrade Bashers. http://messageboardfools.com/bashers.htm IP: Logged |
|
WWJD-thru-me Member |
posted June 20, 2004 22:17
My Guess why no one bothers to respond to posts about no office at an address DaDog was looking for UC at last year is that Melvin, UCAD, other Canadian mining companies and the new law firm don't seem to be worried about where to find them. Most investors know the official pink sheets sites are rarely up to date with share counts and other important facts. If I was worried about it I would call IR and track it down. --------------------------------------------- Now as far as how I feel about my investment in this company is pretty good. The bashers here raise questions but miss this point. In order for this to be a scam we need to believe that the other mining companies who gave us money are either idiots or accomplices to fraud and that the new law firm is also either incompetent or involved in a fraud. It is easier to believe that the Market Makers tried to Naked short this company out of existance and instead stumbled into the ultimate trap. That they sold more shares than are outstanding and will have to buy them back. That there is a deal in the works which will force them to cover and we will then know our share count, the short position and the approximate price per share as far as value goes. Most mining is fairly secretive so limiting information is not a surprise. We will find out very soon what the plan is and I can't wait. I give CMKX a 95% chance of being a great company. I give the scam fraud little credence-less than 5%. These numbers are my opinion but based on everything I have seen, read and know. GLTA and I would like to wake up to a PR that brings tears to everyone's eyes. The longs because they finally will have their beliefs validated, the shorts-because they will be paying for this for a long time, and the bashers because their jealous bone is going to be acting up bigtime. IMO-DD-Debi IP: Logged |
|
futuresobjective Member |
posted June 20, 2004 22:18
quote: I agree with you. IP: Logged |
|
TruthTeller Member |
posted June 20, 2004 22:18
This is my last post regarding this Basher#1 thing. He posted this on page 7 of this thread.. Wallace#1 He thinks CMKX is a scam now but on Jun 10th he didn't think so. I am not sure when he changed his openion. Good night every one. GLTA IP: Logged |
|
Doji say what!! Member |
posted June 20, 2004 22:21
quote:
RIGHT ON!!!!!!!!!! LMAO AT WALLACE ONE IN 6 BILLION IP: Logged |
|
TruthTeller Member |
posted June 20, 2004 22:21
Upside, Negative concerns (like yours) are welcome. But bashing is not. Good luck to all.
quote: Leopard changing it's spots to draw attention to itself? [/QUOTE] IP: Logged |
|
will Member |
posted June 20, 2004 22:22
I need to ask. how long has this share count been going on? How long does it typically take to complete a share count. Seems to me CMKX should know exactly how many O/S there is. Now how long does it take to verify that there is more than issued? IP: Logged |
|
Doji say what!! Member |
posted June 20, 2004 22:26
L2 lineup be here before 9am.. nite IP: Logged |
|
Upside Member |
posted June 20, 2004 22:30
Wallace, Let me start out by saying that I have been one of the most outspoken critics of this stock since these threads began and still hold that viewpoint today. It's based on my own research though. You are incurring the wrath of everyone here through your abrasive posts and lack of solid due diligence that supports your position. About two weeks or so ago you seemed to be a supporter of this stock and now all of a sudden you are vehemently against it. No one here knows where you stand outside of the fact that you seem to enjoy fighting with others. We don't need that here. If you're negative on this one, fine, post some research as to why and support your position. People here are pretty open minded and are willing to listen to an opposing viewpoint. Tone it down a bit and post some hard facts and you'll be accepted, maybe even invited to the CMKX millionaires party. IP: Logged |
|
noahltl New Member |
posted June 20, 2004 22:32
I'm sure the share count is done, but won't be released until the law firm says it is time. This is a big one for them and they will be co-ordinating the timeing of all releases of information. IP: Logged |
|
WWJD-thru-me Member |
posted June 20, 2004 22:36
Bob the slob wrote: From the sidelines again....just wanted to clarify that speculation IS NOT due diligence. A few adjustments from other posts: Moving to OTC is speculation, wanting to become a reporting company is not. This is important because if they want to goto NASDAQ or AMEX, an R/S is in the cards. At this point we don't know where they want to go. The retirement of shares is speculation as well. A PR stating that UC has retired shares is not proof that they have been (or still are) retired, and since the OS isnt known, the whole matter is moot (he could have reauthorized/reissued them). Again, just speculation. The property has no value, UC has mineral rights to the property not the property itself. While the minerals in the dirt may be worth $$$$, the plain fact that he has 1.4 million acres of land is irrelevant as far as placing a value on the land itself. The property is not an asset on paper. As I previously pointed out, saying that there is heavy institutional buying is misleading since there are so many varying entities that appear in Thompsons I-Watch service.
If everyone would stick to the facts and not their "interpretation" of them, this would be a much more productive thread. "Can't we just all get along?" Bob IP: Logged |
|
will Member |
posted June 20, 2004 22:39
OK, but that begs the question, why wait? It's information that will put a lot of nonsensical speculation to rest. Now I have to question again the reluctance of CMKX to be forthright and forthcoming in regards to this issue. It would only help to calm investors and stabilize things for the company. It is probably the biggest syep they can take toward ligitimacy. WHY WAIT? quote: IP: Logged |
This topic is 53 pages long: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 All times are ET (US) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
  |
|
© 1997 - 2004 Allstocks.com. All rights reserved.
Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a
