posted June 21, 2004 18:24            

quote:

---

Originally posted by will:
1.) What's Paxil
2.) Probably does go back to last night. Bugs me to death the lack of news forthcoming.

---

LOL.. Paxil is an antidepressant that also helps with anxiety and obsessive-compulsive disorders.

posted June 21, 2004 18:26            

quote:

---

Originally posted by pharmdman:
LOL.. Paxil is an antidepressant that also helps with anxiety and obsessive-compulsive disorders.

We all want to know now, but we're not going to . We just have to try to accept that. It is irritating to have no info, but necessary.

---

posted June 21, 2004 18:33            

quote:

---

Originally posted by will:
I have some WELBUTRIN here, but if I take I don't sleep well. I'm afraid I'd be here all night asking WHY? LOL

---

LOL.. after last night... STEP AWAY FROM THE WELLBUTRIN...

posted June 21, 2004 18:35            

quote:

---

Originally posted by pharmdman:
LOL.. after last night... STEP AWAY FROM THE WELLBUTRIN...

Seriously, what time do you take it? Is it regular, SR, or XL?

---

posted June 21, 2004 18:40            

quote:

---

Originally posted by will:
It's XL and I haven't taken it for months. I was using it as aid to quit smoking. When I did take it , it was once in the AM.

---

posted June 21, 2004 18:43            

quote:

---

Originally posted by Money_Penny:
Pharm & Noah, thanks for taking out the trash!

---

posted June 21, 2004 18:45            

quote:

---

Originally posted by will:
pharm email me at tgc AT hotmail DOT com. I have a Levitra question for you.

---

posted June 21, 2004 18:47            

quote:

---

Originally posted by kguts11:
Sorry, as I had stated, mine are from the spinoff shares that people call the CIM shares. I was just pointing out that if you can get the certificates for the spinoff shares without hesitation, surely you would be able to get the certs for the shares from the parent company. Sorry for any confusion.

Kev

---

Thank you for the clarification.

posted June 21, 2004 19:37            

quote:

---

Originally posted by derek111c:
Has anyone heard this

http://********.uk/demoshrine/index.htm

---

I am not impress by the mix, it really takes alot of things that have been said about CMKX out of context.
GLTA

posted June 21, 2004 21:39            

quote:

---

hey upside wait for me! I have a great place for us to check out.

---

posted June 21, 2004 21:57            

quote:

---

Marvin, Upside & joey, sounds like a cartoon. LOL

---

posted June 21, 2004 22:13            

quote:

---

Originally posted by TradingWizard:
All of you probably noticed, we are mimicking CMKX behaviour. With news this thread produces 5-6 pages a day, with no news this thread produces 1-2 pages. I think CMKX will be dormant for a while at 0.0005 (may be this week and next) and then it will be time for new base may be at 0.001.
Any other predictions, since not much is happening?

---

posted June 21, 2004 23:37            

quote:

---

Originally posted by highwaychild:
That's what everybody's waitin' on...

---

It would be nice if CMKX stock continue to run at the current trading levels and pps for a while without PR and build up its confidence at 0.0005 pps. STABILITY AND INVESTOR CONFIDENCE IS IMPORTANT. We don't want this stock to be just PR driven, because if nothing happens for a while the stock becomes borring and possibility of pps dip to 0.0001, and we don't want that to happen.

posted June 21, 2004 23:40            

quote:

---

It would be nice if CMKX stock continue to run at the current trading levels and pps for a while without PR and build up its confidence at 0.0005 pps. STABILITY AND INVESTOR CONFIDENCE IS IMPORTANT. We don't want this stock to be just PR driven, because if nothing happens for a while the stock becomes borring and possibility of pps dip to 0.0001, and we don't want that to happen.

---

That's a very good point. If this stock can go through a phase of no news and it holds in the .0005 to .0007 range or so, I for one will be very impressed. That really does show confidence in the stock.

posted June 21, 2004 23:43            

quote:

---

Originally posted by TradingWizard:
It would be nice if CMKX stock continue to run at the current trading levels and pps for a while without PR and build up its confidence at 0.0005 pps. STABILITY AND INVESTOR CONFIDENCE IS IMPORTANT. We don't want this stock to be just PR driven, because if nothing happens for a while the stock becomes borring and possibility of pps dip to 0.0001, and we don't want that to happen.

---

posted June 21, 2004 23:57            

Good night to those who are still around, I guess Upside, tahoechris and Will. :-))

posted June 22, 2004 00:07            

quote:

---

Originally posted by budgie:
melvin mix
http://members.lycos.co.uk/demoshrine/index.htm

---

OH MY

I nearly fell over!

posted June 22, 2004 00:08            

quote:

---

Originally posted by TradingWizard:
Just before I go sleep, one more thought for tonight. My prediction is that the next PRs will be more related to business development and that itself just may keep this stock on the current levels or a bit higher. The issues are naked shorting, moving out from pink sheets, and web site clean up. I personally think that CMKX should get rid off the message board, I find it very unprofessional. Web site with frequently updated messages should do the job.

Good night to those who are still around, I guess Upside, tahoechris and Will. :-))

---

posted June 22, 2004 05:38            

I have seen multiple posts about Wallace.
I think if you looked at what he was saying
it made sense - there are some questions about this company that should be answered.
I have my own opinions and am long in the
stock and will accumulate more.

I think as well there are some people on this
thread that have a very vested interest in
ensuring that there are "NO" negative comments about the stock.

Wallace gets smacked for making a statement
that he does not follow with fact. Most of
this thread "especially" the speculation that is abundant is "not" base on fact.

It would be difficult to say Lets keep it
real, because in penny land real is not what
keeps the pennies swinging.

If we look at Doji for instance... this
guy is making money - I say good for him.
He has the penny game down. As long as we
all realize that there are people who would
pimp/pump their own mothers to make a dime then
you get an idea of what to believe.

With over 1 Billion shares controlled by
members of this board there is a lot that
could be done to help the company make
some better choices and provide information
that would help the company and all of us.

just a few thoughts this morning.

posted June 22, 2004 09:20            

I'm not sure why everyone's defending Wallace though, he's obviously someone who's been on here for a while, but trying to pass himself off as a newbie. He got busted.

I have no problem with someone expressing concerns, it's when they post negative things without logic. They don't necessarily need facts. If someone says "you know, this _____ doesn't sit well with me" and wants to talk it through, I'm all for that.

Anyway, I'm hoping for some decent PR soon. Come on, PR... Daddy needs a two week notice!!

posted June 22, 2004 09:53            

I welcome negative opinion if it is supported by DD or intellectual reasoning, but not simple unsupported attacks.

His lies were exposed by a couple of people on this board by their posting of his previous statements. This was found by doing "due dilligence" on Wallace, investigating the facts and history. This was not a simple argument between pumpers and bashers, but rather between investors seeking "truth" about the stock and the fabricator that Wallace turned out to be.

I hope that the issue is history and that we can go on with intelligent discussions of this stock, pros and cons. But bringing up what happened with Wallace will only continue to denigrate the thread.

posted June 22, 2004 10:16            

Large Diamonds Recovered From Fort A la Corne Kimberlite 140/141
Business Wire, June 17, 2003

Business Editors

VICTORIA, British Columbia--(BUSINESS WIRE)--June 17, 2003

Kensington Resources Ltd. (the "Company") is pleased to announce diamond recovery results for the 2002 minibulk program by the Fort a la Corne Joint Venture. The operator, De Beers Canada Exploration Inc., notified the Company of results arising from final diamond recovery activities at their secure facility located in Johannesburg, South Africa. Minibulk samples were acquired from the drilling phase of the 2002 advanced exploration/evaluation program on Kimberlite 140/141, one of several high-priority bodies identified in the Fort a la Corne Kimberlite Field located 65 kilometres east of Prince Albert, Saskatchewan.

Significant large stone recoveries in the 2002 macrodiamond results included recovery of five diamonds with weights of 10.23 carats, 3.61 carats, 2.595 carats, 2.57 carats, and 1.820 carats, respectively.

"These recoveries provide a major step forward for the project and will have a positive impact on planning for the 2003 evaluation program," commented David H. Stone, President of Kensington Resources. "The results strongly support the previously forecasted large stone potential of the 140/141 kimberlite by De Beers".

A total of 664 macrodiamonds (greater than 1.5 mm screen cutoff), collectively weighing 93.060 carats were recovered from close to 1,272 tonnes of excavated (actual mass as calculated from downhole caliper tool measurements) kimberlite. Of this total, approximately 53 of recovered diamonds are larger than 0.25 carats and together account for 45% of the total weight. A summary of the large stone recoveries is shown in Table 1.

Table 1: Summary of 2002 Large Diamond Recovery

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Size Range Carats Number of Stones
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Stones greater than 1.0 carat 23.030 7
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Stones between 0.75 - 0.99 carats 2.610 3
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Stones between 0.50 - 0.74 carats 4.070 7
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Stones between 0.25 - 0.49 carats (a) 12.195 36
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Total Stones greater than 0.25 carats 41.905 53
--------------------------------------------------------------------

(a) Diamond weights are provided in terms of total carats per sieve
class. The reader is cautioned that for seven interval samples
(12 metres) with multiple stone recoveries, the number of stones
in the 0.25 - 0.49 carat range was estimated by dividing total
carat weight by the number of stones in the +11 sieve class.
This caution also applies to figures quoted in the text for
number of stones greater than 0.25 carat.

Macrodiamond recoveries are grouped into four main areas of the 140/141 body. Drillhole results are shown for each of these areas in Table 2.

The three - 36 inch (914 mm) diameter reverse circulation drillholes, which include 141-30, 141-31, and 141-32 were located less than 20 metres apart and all were proximal to a large diameter reverse circulation drillhole (LDDH) 141-04 (609 mm, 24 inch diameter) drilled in 2000, an NQ corehole 141-29 drilled in 2002, and a PQ corehole also drilled in 2003. The coreholes provided an uninterrupted record of the geology of the kimberlite in this area as well as samples for microdiamond recovery utilizing caustic dissolution methods. LDDH 141-04 previously returned favourable macrodiamond recoveries (169 stones greater than 1.0 mm collectively weighing 12.84 carats). In 2002, a total of 450 macrodiamonds weighing 48.24 carats was recovered from a combined mass of 729.0 tonnes of excavated material from these three drillholes. Thirty stones larger than 0.25 carats were recovered throughout the kimberlite intersections from 130 metres downwards. The largest stone found in these holes was 1.045 carats in weight and was recovered from LDDH 141-32. The average actual sample grade for the three holes was 6.617 cpht and most stones were recovered from below 130 metres depth in fine- to coarse-grained parts of the mega-graded bed, a feature common in the 141 sector of the combined body.

LDDH 141-33 (609 mm or 24 inch diameter) intersected very fine- to coarse-grained olivine-rich pyroclastic kimberlite not previously tested by minibulk samples for macrodiamond content or modeled to determine a grade forecast. A total of 43 macrodiamonds collectively weighing 16.525 carats was recovered from 176.5 tonnes of excavated kimberlite. Recently, a 10.23 carat diamond was recovered from this drillhole and reported as a dodecahedral aggregate stone with two dimensions measuring 14 mm x 10.5 mm. This diamond is better described as a partially resorbed, complex stone showing evidence of internal twinning and local concentrations of inclusions. The stone was recovered between 178-190 metres depth. No conclusive information is available at this time concerning value of the stone or the potential impact on grade forecasts and average values for body 140/141, although the stone currently is undergoing valuation by De Beers experts. This intersection of kimberlite was comparatively homogeneous in terms of lithology and six other stones larger than 0.25 carats were recovered from various depths within the kimberlite including a 0.835 carat stone, which was recovered from between 262-274 metres depth.

Core drilling during the 2002 program indicated the presence of thick beds of coarser-grained xenolithic kimberlite breccias. Large diameter drillholes 140-29 and 140-30 (609 mm or 24 inch diameter) intersected these prospective beds among other kimberlite phases predominantly in the south and central parts of the combined body. A total of 127 macrodiamonds weighing 23.95 carats was recovered from 184.98 tonnes of excavated kimberlite from the two drillholes. Of this, 14 stones are larger than 0.25 carats including the five largest at 3.61 carats, 2.57 carats, 2.59 carats, 1.82 carats, and 1.16 carats, respectively.

posted June 22, 2004 10:18            

The choice to blow through like a bull in a china shop was his. If he's new to OTCBB, he should sit back and learn. Should he ask questions? Absolutely. Even if they're potentially exposing something negative? Most definitely. But he was doing more harm than good with his approach. I also stated an opinion and he jumped my head, so I responded in kind.