|
Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board
![]() Micro Penny Stocks, Penny Stocks Under $0.10
![]() CMKX II new Thread. Get it while you CAN ! (Page 28)
|
This topic is 53 pages long: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 |
next newest topic | next oldest topic |
| Author | Topic: CMKX II new Thread. Get it while you CAN ! |
|
will Member |
Upside, because you do have credibility, was the PR actually a fake, hoax, not real? Has it been established that it is fraudulent? [This message has been edited by will (edited June 16, 2004).] IP: Logged |
|
Money_Penny Member |
If the PR was fake, which I think it was, shouldn't UKG, UCG or whatever they're called, have released a NR or some other statement that the PR was fake? IP: Logged |
|
TradingWizard Member |
quote: Sarki it will happen, there is always someone who will mess things up, if the world was perfect the life will be too borring.
[This message has been edited by TradingWizard (edited June 16, 2004).] IP: Logged |
|
cool1sh Member |
I agree with you, am waiting patiently for the news. Also, I think that some (or lot) of the shorts were covered this week.
quote: IP: Logged |
|
WWJD-thru-me Member |
sarki316-Anybody who saw that PR and sold read the reaction of the market correctly. I kept my shares because I am more afraid of missing this stock when it runs than losing my investment. Ideally I would like to protect my original investment but think this price is too low to sell shares to try to obtain a free postition. I tried to track down the news release but realized true or false this was taking a hit. Not knowing if this would force UC to show us what he is saving for the big Mount Saint Helen's PR I didn't sell. Still looking forward to some good news from the audit and the change to a new agent. IMO-DD-GLTA-Debi IP: Logged |
|
will Member |
Let me stand on my head for that one Paul, lol IP: Logged |
|
Upside Member |
originally posted by sarki316: quote: I disagree completely. The p/r comes out and looks official, the TSX resumes trading on the two stocks because of it, CMKX's corporate rep. acknowledges that those are the true results. Those all lend an air of legitimacy to it. It sounds to me like at least one disbeliever is a "little kid" who just saw 50 of his 100 dollars fly out the window. IP: Logged |
|
darrenbaker Member |
. [This message has been edited by darrenbaker (edited June 16, 2004).] IP: Logged |
|
TradingWizard Member |
Let me re-elaborate, I was cheering sparki up lol. I think the PR was legit, if it was not, I think company would release correction immediately. ------------------ IP: Logged |
|
WWJD-thru-me Member |
I am sure some covering has been done but if this was short to the tune of 1000 billion shares it will take about 2 months of the kind of volume we have been seeing lately to cover. That excludes any shares that we or other stockholders have been buying so how many are actually being purchased and retired by those who are short is anyones guess. Looking forward to seeing this play out. -Debi IP: Logged |
|
darrenbaker Member |
quote: Does anyone think this is worth talking about? [/B][/QUOTE] IP: Logged |
|
Upside Member |
originally posted by TradingWizard: quote: Exactly. This p/r came through United Carina under the name of the President of the company.. If it was false don't you think someone would be making some noise? If those results weren't true, wouldn't CMKX be refuting them? I too believe it was legit. IP: Logged |
|
CB Member |
Has anyone seen this ...? http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/quickchart/qsymbinfo.asp?sid=1689086&time=8&freq =1&symb=cmkx EDIT:..> Shares Outstanding: 684,448,000 [This message has been edited by CB (edited June 16, 2004).] IP: Logged |
|
Upside Member |
originally posted by CB: quote: IP: Logged |
|
Upside Member |
That's data that's at least two years old from when they were on the OTCBB and were a reporting company. IP: Logged |
|
sarki316 Member |
Remeber 1 things whoever bought this stock at 0.0001 made a profit straight up. The only DD you need to know is NY Firm!!!!!!! IP: Logged |
|
Wallace#1 Member |
sarki316, What the h*ll is a "schumks" and in what language are you writing? How do you pronounce it? LMAO IP: Logged |
|
VNGNTN1 Member |
Darren What do you want to say. Looks to me like someone is getting paid off to keep quiet, but someONE wasn't happy enough.I wish I had time to read the 1934 rules. VAN IP: Logged |
|
sarki316 Member |
I was supposed to be shmuck!!!!! I was just typing fast. Where are you from???? Idaho?????? IP: Logged |
|
Upside Member |
Darren, It certainly is explosive information. Can you imagine what will happen if this story ever does break? Sweeping, mass changes in the way the stock market is run. I don't think this will ever come out, at least not in an un-edited version. We'll get some toned down, washed out version of it. IP: Logged |
|
VNGNTN1 Member |
You know what would be neat ?? If there were 3-5 mini-moderators who could put a highlight behind blocks of text in a color that supports What they are watching. 1-Technical/Analysis 2-Fundamentals 3-Positive 4-Negative 5-Position Combiner Who would merge blocks of text in a read only thread so busy people could bypass all the reading and skip pumps/bashing/jokes/stories.etc. You could get people who follow different stocks. VAN [This message has been edited by VNGNTN1 (edited June 16, 2004).] IP: Logged |
|
TradingWizard Member |
quote: Now we are talking real business, efficiency is what I was looking for also, and this is great idea. ------------------ IP: Logged |
|
Upside Member |
Van, I'm not quite sure I know what you mean. Are you talking about having a group of moderators who would read each post and then color code them according to the subject matter? For instance if technical analysis were green, the moderator would read his/her assigned threads and color code all t.a. posts green? Sounds like an interesting concept but I think Bob here would need a whole load of moderators for all of the different threads. Maybe only do it with the 5 or 6 most popular or lengthy threads? IP: Logged |
|
makemoney3 Member |
Current level II please... IP: Logged |
|
Bob Frey Member |
Neat Idea. I am thinking that you folks who are serious about investing and trading would not need it though. Letting these threads get this long is a huge waste of time for most. I would think more about getting someone to be the keeper of real DD or facts. Then once a week or day or every 35 pages , 10 pages or whatever they start a new thread with a post of the most current DD first. If we got enough backing we could then close the old threads as the new ones were started. IP: Logged |
|
VNGNTN1 Member |
In the case of CMKX 1-T/A ?? 2-FUND-Van 3-POSITIVE-WWJD 4-NEGATIVE-UPSIDE 5-Combiner-ALI(also has a legal slant) The combined read only would be a much more condensed & longer thread for research. This data would come from the regular posts by everyone but only parts would be saved. BOB Check out CMKXFORUM there poll is very good. They don't have nearly the support this board has. The suggestion an earlier post to limit to most active was good and you or OFFSHSORE could setup the "READ ONLY" site and solicit mini-moderators. VAN IP: Logged |
|
Upside Member |
Bob and/or Van, Couple of questions. if a thread is closed after say 10 pages, is it completely inaccessable or is it read only. Either way it would drop off pretty quick. Second, could a color code system (or something similar) be self moderated where it was a condition of posting ie: if you're posting a chart interpretation of a stock you could click on a t.a button? Just a thought. IP: Logged |
|
Wallace#1 Member |
Sarki316, What do you mean "Idaho"??? Are you trying to start another rumor??? LMAO again. IP: Logged |
|
SimplePlan Member |
News Out!
Safe Harbor Statement under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995: The statements, other than the statements of historical facts, contained in this release which are not historical facts, may be deemed to contain forward-looking statements with respect to events, the occurrence of which involves risk and uncertainties, including, without limitation, demand and competition for the company's products and services, the availability to the company of adequate financing to support its anticipated activities, the ability of the company to generate cash flow from operations and the ability of the company to manage its operations. SOURCE: CMKM Diamonds Inc. CMKM Diamonds Inc. IP: Logged |
|
dodga Member |
Real PR out this evening fellow CMKX'ers!! Fully reporting company. That alone is worth a helluva lot more than the diamondiferous findings!!! Press Release Source: CMKM Diamonds Inc.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
IP: Logged |
|
highwaychild Member |
I elect Offshoretrader. IP: Logged |
|
futuresobjective Member |
anyone think there will be a reverse split if they go in that direction? IP: Logged |
|
Booty Quest Member |
Damm, i missed you guys! This is a good radio call from ibc: http://members.aol.com/secass/melvin/ IP: Logged |
|
PAUL Member |
I was thinking I got booted because of my upside-down, deleted post. Good to see everyone here tonight for the post trading day discussion. PAUL ------------------ IP: Logged |
|
Booty Quest Member |
quote: Yeah, Darren I read the whole thing, it was amazing and horrifying! Thanks for the find! My brother's name is Daren! IP: Logged |
|
Leeman1 Member |
What happened? Was the site down for a while? Got real nervous. IP: Logged |
|
Doji say what!! Member |
the withdraw was nasty....
NICE CLOSE TODAY LOT'S OF BUY'S THE LAST HOUR IP: Logged |
|
rsnws Member |
Has anyone heard this. It's the guy that was on IBC before Melvin this morning. I think his name was Joel. http://members.aol.com/secass/melvin/ IP: Logged |
|
HarryHar Member |
Can't get the webpage for that IBC link. Can someone please summarize what was said by "joel"? Thanks! IP: Logged |
|
Leeman1 Member |
quote:
IP: Logged |
|
will Member |
Upside: I am almost afraid to ask your opinion of this evening's PR: Awefully short, and nothing new. What impact will it have on tomorrow, if any? IP: Logged |
|
Leeman1 Member |
Anyone think this will dip to .0004 in the morning then head back up? I have a buy order in for that price. Put one in today at .0003 just incase but changed it tonight to the 04. IP: Logged |
|
Doji say what!! Member |
WILL READ TWICE IT'S GOOD NEWS..... THE LAWYERS ARE PAID AND ARE WORKING ON SOMETHING AS WE SPEAK. HOPEFULLY HELPFUL IN THE END FOR THE SHAREHOLDERS DIAMOND NEWS NOPE BUT LAWYER NEWS IS A CLOSE SECOND. IP: Logged |
|
Doji say what!! Member |
We have been retained by the company to resolve the problems it has been facing, and we expect to devote significant efforts immediately toward that goal significant efforts immediately toward that goal >>>>>> ROCK ON SOUNDS LIKE ENFORCEMENT!!!!!! NITE & JEFF NEED TO GO DOWN TOWN IP: Logged |
|
mizzou7 Member |
I have a buy order in at .0002 Without something big... soon, we will re-visit .0001 /.0002
quote: IP: Logged |
|
mizzou7 Member |
IMHO
quote: IP: Logged |
|
Doji say what!! Member |
DREAM ON .0002/.0004 LOL WE GO UP .0005 WAS THE DEAL SHOULD HAVE SNAGGED THEM IP: Logged |
|
Upside Member |
originally posted by will: quote: Hey, it's good to see everything's back up and running! You don't really want my opinion of this p/r do you? It's not favorable. I love these lines: This could mean anything! IP: Logged |
|
mizzou7 Member |
I hope you are right... but just in case I'm ready...
quote: IP: Logged |
|
mizzou7 Member |
Keep in mind, the PR was not good IMO.. I don't think it will impress to many investors...
quote: IP: Logged |
This topic is 53 pages long: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 All times are ET (US) | next newest topic | next oldest topic |
![]() |
|
© 1997 - 2004 Allstocks.com. All rights reserved.
Powered by Infopop www.infopop.com © 2000
Ultimate Bulletin Board 5.47a