posted
We are getting closer to the middle of July. Frank said we would have the audit done mid July. So anyday we could see a big PR about the filing and or audit.. Let the good times roll.
IP: Logged |
posted
But we also know how franks does it, Yeah he said mid July but he didn't say what year. Could be mid july of next year. watch the wording but we shall see
quote:Originally posted by noah129: im trying to buy in at .0017 also still no fills.i think maybe ill go for .0018 im not as patient as i sometimes should be.
i also dont like being penny wise and pound foolish though.
I waited for 17 as well with no chance of a nibble.Wish I had done it yesterday. Got another 700k at .0018
Posted by: lobogotti In reply to: None Date:7/14/2005 2:26:44 PM Post #of 136986
Milwaukee Cable Might Offer Q Network Milwaukee - Time-Warner, the city's cable provider, is considering offering the Q Network, according to a report published in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. The claim came in an Internet chat transcript between the paper's TV critic Joanne Weintraub and an online participant who identified himself as "Lance Bass," who wondered if the cable provider would be offering the recently-launched gay cable channel LOGO. "If you're talking about Logo, the MTV gay channel," Weintraub responded, "it actually launches today in New York, L.A. and eight other cities, Milwaukee not included. At the moment, local cable carriers have no plans to pick it up. But another gay-oriented channel, Q, may be available on digital cable later this season. These pick-ups are driven by consumer interest, so by all means write to your cable or satellite provider and say "I want my Logo and/or Q!" Weintraub also noted that "here!", a third gay cable channel was running the "under the radar."
quote:Originally posted by buckwheatbob: The pressure is building :)
Posted by: lobogotti In reply to: None Date:7/14/2005 2:26:44 PM Post #of 136986
Milwaukee Cable Might Offer Q Network Milwaukee - Time-Warner, the city's cable provider, is considering offering the Q Network, according to a report published in the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. The claim came in an Internet chat transcript between the paper's TV critic Joanne Weintraub and an online participant who identified himself as "Lance Bass," who wondered if the cable provider would be offering the recently-launched gay cable channel LOGO. "If you're talking about Logo, the MTV gay channel," Weintraub responded, "it actually launches today in New York, L.A. and eight other cities, Milwaukee not included. At the moment, local cable carriers have no plans to pick it up. But another gay-oriented channel, Q, may be available on digital cable later this season. These pick-ups are driven by consumer interest, so by all means write to your cable or satellite provider and say "I want my Logo and/or Q!" Weintraub also noted that "here!", a third gay cable channel was running the "under the radar."
buck Interesting. Thanks.
-------------------- Everything I say is only my opinion ... right or wrong.
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by qnique: But we also know how franks does it, Yeah he said mid July but he didn't say what year. Could be mid july of next year. watch the wording but we shall see
quote:Originally posted by permanentjaun: Where did Frank say July for the audit? Matt
Matt, it was in a newspaper interview Frank did I believe. I am trying to find it. It was back in June. He was talking about things coming together and the seriousness of Q and about the audit would be done sometime in July. Don't quote me, but it was something like that.
If anyone else remembers this and the article please post it.
IP: Logged |
posted
This post originates from RB. Does anyone remember aboiut the private placements?
Posted by: Sputnik In reply to: None Date:7/14/2005 5:29:24 PM Post #of 137124
From RB!
By: karzoid_fistula 14 Jul 2005, 05:18 PM EDT Msg. 932815 of 932839 (This msg. is a reply to 932795 by stock-up.) Jump to msg. # your memory suxxx stock-up. Frankie disclosed 70% private placements (unregistered 144's) & 30% stock proceeds is how QBID finances QTN.
Thursday, July 14, 2005 Posted: 0709 GMT (1509 HKT)
A gay couple at this year's Gay Pride Parade in Boston. Growing numbers of U.S. companies are introducing anti-discrimination codes.QUICKVOTE Should companies provide partner benefits for same-sex couples? Yes No or View Results OTHER NEWS Land mine lessons in salesmanship GLOBAL OFFICE Are you hungry for information? Click here for stories ON CNNI TV Click here for Global Office show times on CNN International. YOUR SAY E-mail us: Global Office wants to hear from you. E-mail your questions and suggestions and we will read the best on air. (CNN) -- Art Weidner describes himself as an easy-going guy. An engineer based in Seattle, Art enjoys spending time outdoors. He usually avoids public confrontation.
But a recent e-mail from his boss explaining why his company was supporting gay pride month prompted Art to speak out.
"I felt that this was something beyond the realm of what a CEO should be doing," Weidner told CNN. "I felt he was pushing a political, social and personal agenda on company time."
Art sent a reply to his boss and copied it to several Christian groups whose members, he felt, would share his belief that corporate endorsement of gay pride and gay rights equaled a tacit approval of gay marriage.
Weidner is hardly a voice in the wilderness. In a recent CNN-USA Today poll 56 percent of Americans said gay marriage should not be recognized.
Many people who oppose gay marriage also oppose the idea that companies should extend benefits to gay partners. They say it is an issue of morals, not money.
Yet statistics suggest that a growing number of U.S. businesses disagree with those sentiments.
According to the Human Rights Campaign, 49 out of 50 Fortune 50 companies have non-discrimination codes and more than 8,000 U.S. firms provide domestic partner benefits for same-sex couples.
But many companies have discovered that coming out in support of gay rights can cause problems of its own.
Hoping to force corporate America to steer clear of social issues, conservative religious activists have attempted to use boycotts, letter writing campaigns and other tactics to sway public opinion.
Under pressure from a local church, Microsoft backed off support for a gay rights bill in its home state of Washington. A barrage of "passionate e-mails" from employees convinced Microsoft to reverse course after just two weeks.
Unhappy about Procter & Gamble's support for a Cincinnati gay rights proposal, fundamentalist Christian groups last September called on their members to boycott Crest toothpaste and other P&G products.
And in May the American Family Association (AFA) began a letter-writing campaign against Kraft in protest at the company's planned support for the 2006 Gay Games.
The AFA also boycotted Ford after the carmaker gave money off new models to members of certain gay rights groups.
"I certainly don't want, if I am going to buy Ford products, for my money to be going to organizations promoting same-sex marriage," said the AFA's Tim Wildmon.
Ford, Procter & Gamble, Kraft and Microsoft told CNN that they all value diversity. Microsoft recently reaffirmed its support for Washington's proposed gay rights legislation, and helped sponsor last month's gay parade in Seattle.
Groups that actively oppose business taking a stand on gay rights also face powerful opponents such as New York's chief financial officer Bill Thompson.
"We just think about it as good business and good business sense," said Thompson, who has used shareholder resolutions to force companies to adopt gay-friendly policies.
"If employees feel that they're not open to being discriminated against I think it makes everyone feel a little safer and a little more wanted. And then you have better and more productive employees."
While the issue hasn't yet had a major impact on corporate finances, it is causing confusion in some executive offices as companies seek to avoid antagonizing activists on both sides of the divide.
In a staff e-mail sent out after the Washington legislation controversy, Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer asked, "When should a company take a position on a broader social issue and when should it not? What message does the company taking a position send to its employees who have strongly-held beliefs on the opposite side of the issue?"
That's a question being asked by other big companies.
"This is tremendously hard and there's no easy answer," said Stephanie Valdez Streaty of Nissan USA, which recently decided to extend health benefits to gay partners.
"No matter what decision Nissan makes in any of our policies or practices, we're going to get criticism."
Nissan didn't move quickly enough for former employee Joe LaMuraglia. A gay man from Los Angeles, LaMuraglia quit Nissan so he could spend more time campaigning for gay rights in the workplace.
"I realized working for Nissan that I can affect change better outside the company then within," he told CNN. "I am doing this not for just myself. If there's a lesbian couple that wants to adopt a baby that's working for a company, I want to be able to say that I helped affect that change."
Companies talked to by CNN said they were listening to all sides and trying to come up with policies that satisfy employees, customers and shareholders.
But it's an almost impossible balancing act between irreconcilable positions -- a social divide that has left workers at odds and their bosses caught in the crossfire.
quote:Originally posted by Doctoall: Remember this last post and the reply that I received from Richard. "I most certainly did not set up any tours" and yet this posted started the post with a claim that Richard set up a meeting at Firestone for them
I saw this. I most certainly did not set up any tours.
Regards, Richard Brown
Equity Relations, Inc.
CREATING SYNERGY BETWEEN INVESTOR & COMPANY 617-314-7379 staff@equityrelations.com www.equityrelations.com
-----Original Message----- From: Wayne ******** [mailto:tm@******.com] Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 5:05 PM To: staff@equityrelations.com Subject: Richard How True Is This Stuff
Richard: How true is the following post that is on Allstocks???
Printable Version of Topic Click here to view this topic in its original format Q Forum > General Q Forum Topic > Q STUDIO-III
Posted by: koreanvet Jun 20 2005, 02:58 PM Went to the Q studio today and met Sherrie at the front desk.Told her about my phone call with Richard Brown.Richard set up my meeting and arranged for me to visit Firestone Comm. a few days back. Well Sherrie called Frank to o.k. my tour.I talked to Frank for 10 minutes.First he wanted to tell the history of cable t.v. startup and what it takes to get a company going.I stopped Frank and asked him some hard questions.When will we see other carriers.His reply was that they are in talks with carriers and things are going well.Q has to show the other carriers a good line up in order to get their business.Q on the road is doing real well and drawing lots of attention.The customer base is up to 32,000 who pay the monthly fee. So far they have another 30,000 who is in the process of hooking up to the Q.Frank said that this time next year the Q will be worth between 1 and 1.5 billion dollars at the low end. Frank wasnt to worried about Here-tv or Logo. He said that the two would help the Q in the long run. I asked Frank about the low PPS. He said that Knight and other trading agencies are still killing the Q.The stock is still being run down bye short selling and some naked short selling.They are working very hard to solve this but it takes forever because Q-is a pk stock with a dirty shell.Frank said the audit is just about over and in Mid July the paper work will be finished.Rene and Gary are in Europe working to get Q off the list.He said it was slow going but it will be done.I asked Frank where the PPS should be this time next year.He said that a number around .15-.25 was in sight if all goes with his plan.I told him that the Pr bull does more harm than good .He thanked me for telling his this.Frank also said that Q-live will transmitt from six cities at the same time soon=Atlanta,N.Y. Houston,Chicage,SAN FRAN,and H onolulu.It will be part of the big event that is going on in San Fran.Frank said hang tough for a lot of people are working hard on the Q and that when the Q bunch comes back from the road he would be here and that I could come out to the studio .No pictures allowed this time-Maybe on the next visit if Frank can be here.Have to go and meet with the Firestone group=Will keep ya posted
on that page that this link takes you to look in the center box Look at the bottom of the box, there is a link there that will get you where you want to go.
Rod
quote:Originally posted by Penny-Trader: i believe that some here may find this link of interest.
quote:Originally posted by imakmony2005: Penny-Trader, great link on above post, but man why cant i find my QBID theres no sign where is Q on thier w- page. thanks
posted
its there its the center box. you cant actually click the link you will have to copy it to the clipboard and past it in the browser but it is in the last paragragh of the page
it looks like this:
Please note, as a guest, you only be able to a select portion of the Forum. To view all contents, you must become a member as only they are allowed to participate in the Forum as this keeps the unwanted away. So join today.
Have a great day ?
Q Forum Link:http://s6.************.com/Q_Forum
Bugzie
Im doing all i can here to help you. i am not going to physically post a link to it because im not about to tick off Bob.
this is my last post on this subject.
no direspect intended but we are spitting in bobs face here and i dont want to do that to him.
Rod
quote:Originally posted by imakmony2005: Penny-Trader, great link on above post, but man why cant i find my QBID theres no sign where is Q on thier w- page. thanks
-------------------- Dont buy or sell on my opinions, do your research. Make sure you know what you are buying before you buy.
This is a non reporting pink sheet with very high risk. From high risk comes high rewards. Dont invest more then you can afford to lose.
IP: Logged |
posted
Rod, Have another look at question #4. It says last month we where up 285%. Is that up 285% from the previous month or from the begining figure of 22K? Just another question to ponder.
posted
your guess is as good as mine. but if you want to be conservative wirk with the 15,000 subs that we know hes said a while back that would be the conservative estimate i would think
rod
quote:Originally posted by buckwheatbob: Rod, Have another look at question #4. It says last month we where up 285%. Is that up 285% from the previous month or from the begining figure of 22K? Just another question to ponder.
-------------------- Dont buy or sell on my opinions, do your research. Make sure you know what you are buying before you buy.
This is a non reporting pink sheet with very high risk. From high risk comes high rewards. Dont invest more then you can afford to lose.
IP: Logged |