posted
The main problem I see with the quiet period theory is that it takes place after a registration filing with the SEC. So far, no such filing has been made.
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by Upside: The main problem I see with the quiet period theory is that it takes place after a registration filing with the SEC. So far, no such filing has been made.
posted
not only that: Quiet Period The term "quiet period," also referred to as the "waiting period," is not defined under the federal securities laws.
this would imply that a NEW company is being formed.....and a new IPO is being made
quiet period The period starting when an issuer hires an underwriter and ending 25 days after the security begins trading, during which the issuer cannot comment publicly on the offering due to SEC rules.
what issuer did they hire?
[This message has been edited by glassman (edited September 01, 2004).]
quote:Originally posted by glassman: not only that: [b] Quiet Period The term "quiet period," also referred to as the "waiting period," is not defined under the federal securities laws. [/B]
quote:Originally posted by glassman: not only that: [b] Quiet Period The term "quiet period," also referred to as the "waiting period," is not defined under the federal securities laws. [/B]
HA HA HA.Then why is it on SEC.GOV/answers???HA HA HA.
I would also like to look at those claims. Is there some way you could provide a link that I can just click on? As I have said before, I am not the best with computers. Thanks!
posted
highway, I think that just means that the term is not recognized under Federal law. It's either called something else or there is no legal term for it but the quiet period itself is real.
IP: Logged |
posted
How dare you doubt R Glenn. Anyone who can make 300B share deal with Howard Hughes and the MM's could surely make a secret deal with SEC. He will just explain to go public at the required time would be detrimental to the "master plan". I'm sure they would be understanding, and agree the filing can come after the quiet period. This guy is a magician, Urban is a genius, and Melvin is a horses ass. Now tell me how can a team like that be beat, buddy.
quote:Originally posted by Upside: originally posted by will: You looking for a fight tonight buddy?
quote:Originally posted by highwaychild: HA HA HA.Then why is it on SEC.GOV/answers???HA HA HA.
hahahaha hiway i quoted that directly from the SEC<GOV answers..if you actually look there you will see it...
Quiet Period The term "quiet period," also referred to as the "waiting period," is not defined under the federal securities laws. The quiet period extends from the time a company files a registration statement with the SEC until SEC staff declares the registration statement "effective." During this period, the federal securities laws limit what information a company and related parties can release to the public. Rule 134 of the Securities Act of 1933 discusses these limitations.
this is the page you posted the link to--do you actually read the links or do you just post what they tell you to?
[This message has been edited by glassman (edited September 01, 2004).]
quote:How dare you doubt R Glenn. Anyone who can make 300B share deal with Howard Hughes and the MM's could surely make a secret deal with SEC. He will just explain to go public at the required time would be detrimental to the "master plan". I'm sure they would be understanding, and agree the filing can come after the quiet period. This guy is a magician, Urban is a genius, and Melvin is a horses ass. Now tell me how can a team like that be beat, buddy.
I've got a bad feeling that he might be working on another 800 billion share deal as we speak.
posted
Does it really matter anymore? I read the last three or four pages of posts, and the best one was Tamie's. The post where she says she selling, until this becomes a reporting company.
O/S Share structure Sample results Progress on becoming a reporting company Evidence of NSS, PPS
She could have added those also.
quote:Originally posted by Upside: originally posted by will: I've got a bad feeling that he might be working on another 800 billion share deal as we speak.
posted
I was tring to tell Wally Wall St. what a quiet prd. was. I can see right thru you Glassman,I liked Upmans take better.HA HA HA. Will, you're a trip.HA HA HA.
IP: Logged |
posted
So much for a quiet period excuse. This as per Rule 134 of the Securities Act of 1933:
An issuer that is in registration should maintain communications with the public as long as the subject matter of the communications is limited to ordinary-course business and financial information, which may include the following:
advertisements concerning the issuer's products and services;
Exchange Act reports required to be filed with the Commission;
proxy statements, annual reports to security holders and dividend notices;
press announcements concerning business and financial developments;
answers to unsolicited telephone inquiries concerning business matters from securities analysts, financial analysts, security holders and participants in the communications field who have a legitimate interest in the issuer's affairs; and
security holders' meetings and responses to security holder inquiries relating to these matters.67
posted
about sask ltd. i think that came up awhile ago..as 4 differant companies own differant %'s of the same claim it is held under one name. common sence says for there to be no real claims then 5 companies including shane resourses are in on the scam and since only cmkx is not reporting it would be highly unlikely for that to be true. remember all these companies have had prs about the same claims and canada is much stricter about pr's then the U.S.
IP: Logged |
posted
Wait a minute now! Didn't that guy tell shadow man that the company was on holiday and couldn't be contacted. Could be! I bet it is! Damn! They are in a secret quiet time, can't be reached for two more weeks. This can be an unusal gag order from the SEC as part of the secret deal. I just wonder what Dr D, Zen, and Sterling could do with that little precious piece of information shadow man posted, on holiday for two weeks. I bet they could expand that to prove a quiet period plus getting funding for a rocketship to Mars where daimonds litter the surface.
quote:Originally posted by Wallace#1: So much for a quiet period excuse. This as per Rule 134 of the Securities Act of 1933:
An issuer that is in registration should maintain communications with the public as long as the subject matter of the communications is limited to ordinary-course business and financial information, which may include the following:
advertisements concerning the issuer's products and services;
Exchange Act reports required to be filed with the Commission;
proxy statements, annual reports to security holders and dividend notices;
press announcements concerning business and financial developments;
answers to unsolicited telephone inquiries concerning business matters from securities analysts, financial analysts, security holders and participants in the communications field who have a legitimate interest in the issuer's affairs; and
security holders' meetings and responses to security holder inquiries relating to these matters.67
quote:They are in a secret quiet time, can't be reached for two more weeks. This can be an unusal gag order from the SEC as part of the secret deal. I just wonder what Dr D, Zen, and Sterling could do with that little precious piece of information shadow man posted
I don't know about Zen but I'm sure Sterling will come up with a double secret quiet time theory.
posted
Will, how are you pal? LMAO at that one!! Problem is you left out the Green Baron, the Fairy Princess, the Tooth Fairy and all the others. Really do have a sense of humor haven't you?
Don't know how long I will post on this thread, but I thought I might at least give it a brief shot.
[This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited September 01, 2004).]
posted
Makes no difference Wallace. Nothing is going to change. There will believers who stoke the coals, there will be nonbelievers who wet the coals. Then there is the company that says nothing officially, and when they do it as ambiguous as they can make it. There are those who clammer for forthright, direct, accurate information, and for that they're labeled bashers. There are those that will explain it away as a "master plan" and "genius", for that they're labeled pumpers. The company will say nothing, and every once in awhile let their pet slob, Melvin out there to say "Mt. St. Helens", or "you should see what I have on my desk". Just to keep people on their toes, and give them something to argue, specualte, and theorize about. I'd love to make a ton of money on this deal, but sober, sane, common sense says it's a longshot. Now those that have $20,000+, and are still buying and advocating buying, well, they see it as an odds on favorite. This whole thing is so idiotic, and polarized it has become entertainment, laughable entertainment. It's worth $300 to be entertained, but I doubt it would be as funny at $20,000+.
quote:Originally posted by Wallace#1: Will, how are you pal? LMAO at that one!! Really do have a sense of humor haven't you? Don't know how long I will post on this thread, but I thought I might at least give it a brief shot.
quote:Originally posted by glassman: hahahaha hiway i quoted that directly from the SEC<GOV answers..if you actually look there you will see it...
[b]
Quiet Period The term "quiet period," also referred to as the "waiting period," is not defined under the federal securities laws. The quiet period extends from the time a company files a registration statement with the SEC until SEC staff declares the registration statement "effective." During this period, the federal securities laws limit what information a company and related parties can release to the public. Rule 134 of the Securities Act of 1933 discusses these limitations.
this is the page you posted the link to--do you actually read the links or do you just post what they tell you to?
[This message has been edited by glassman (edited September 01, 2004).][/B]
quote:Originally posted by Upside: The question is if all of these claims were transferred to cMKI/M/X, why aren't they now showing up under their name?
YES This is something we need to know. At the time the were talking about 17-22 claims . Now they are speaking of 1.4m acres(certainly more claims) If the claims are not officially CMKM then we have nothing anyway. VAN
posted
secman,I usualy like to play on PR.I'm not out to hurt anybody.I'm just kickin' back, waiting for news. Kick 'em when there up,kick 'em when their down...Gives 'em dirty laundry.
IP: Logged |
quote:Originally posted by highwaychild: secman,I usualy like to play on PR.I'm not out to hurt anybody.I'm just kickin' back, waiting for news. Kick 'em when there up,kick 'em when their down...Gives 'em dirty laundry.
posted
Van, Whether the clains are "ours" ("we"), in your post. Do you think it will make any difference. If you brought proof they owned no claims, how long do you think it would take for you to be talked over, labeled a goof, a basher? It makes NO difference. The company says nothing, they depend on their BELIEVERS to promote them, and talk over any doubts and doubters.
quote:Originally posted by VNGNTN1: YES This is something we need to know. At the time the were talking about 17-22 claims . Now they are speaking of 1.4m acres(certainly more claims) If the claims are not officially CMKM then we have nothing anyway. VAN
posted
Now here's some real dd! Using a micrometer, I just measured the thickness of an old stock certificate we have. It was about .008" thick. If you took all 800 billion CMKX certificates (assuming the same .008" thickness) and piled them on top of one another, it would be a pile 101,010 MILES high, or, almost halfway to the moon. I think I should get the research of the night award for that one!
IP: Logged |
posted
WILL I am one of those who believes if the facts are in, the business run with attention to detail, good management, etc. It won"t make any difference what is said. We really need to lock down some of these things like SHADOW is doing, claims,track intercompany ownership,etc.We need to use public document as much as possible. PR'S though better than rumor can be only part truthful. It is very apparent on this board how a PR can be interpreted many ways. I don't agree with Wallace about the ancillary companys, I have already almost gone to free shares on 25m CMKX by trading them. Thta is my hedge,but we still need the poop on CMKX. UPSIDE-Your research neglected to mention wether there were any diamonds. VAN
[This message has been edited by VNGNTN1 (edited September 01, 2004).]
Topic Closed
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic
