Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
Post New Topic  New Poll  
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
my profile login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board » Micro Penny Stocks, Penny Stocks $0.10 & Under » CMKX ... VI ... The Saga Continues (Page 34)

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!   This topic comprises 75 pages: 1  2  3  ...  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  ...  73  74  75   
Author Topic: CMKX ... VI ... The Saga Continues
noahltl
New Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for noahltl     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Mr Webb of Stockwatch is an apparent graduate of the Dan Rather School of Journalism.
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
dwman
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for dwman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by Money_Penny:
To "assume" that 10% of our claims are pure kimberlite is ridiculous!

Money...It's not like legal just came up with "ridiculous assumptions". We do have the Shore Gold PR from today. We also have the aereal survey. To call legal's assumptions ridiculous, is ridiculous. He should be able to share his thoughts without being called ridiculous.


IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
dwman
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for dwman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
ooops Noah...I didn't see your post to money. I agree.
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
WorkAHolic
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for WorkAHolic     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by glassman:
how about some statistics on how often 2 kimberlite pipes right next to each other produce the same results????

Since you asked:

73% of kimberlite formations exhibit similar mineral composition when these said formations are within the limits of close proximity and same geological formation and have not been diluted or tainted by glacial or sedimentary degregation.

US Geological Survey USGS/Reports: June 1997 / Volume 37, page 38


Seems to me that anyone can quote a source and it not be true or real. You guys should not believe everything that is put on this or any other board unless you do the research yourself. I've notice many false or misleading quotes of PRs, Magazines, Web Sources and Books that are presented as fact. The above is one of them. There is no such report, this was made up.


IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
well stock patrol is right. as of today there is no real concrete reason to buy cmkx stock except a hope & a prayer. do they have lots of mineral rights? yes but again no results that say lets put the mine here. UC does have a shady background. cmkx does have the highest o/s count ever known to the stockmarket. cmkx threads look at lot like the election campaign..if you mention kerry's voting record its called bashing. getting a lawyer, any lawyer is meaningless. you can make as strong a case for bad as good. the fact that he's a lawyer should say somtthing. still there are a few reporting companies that are willing to put money into cmkx and stranger things then cmkx turning into a huge payday happen all the time. the claims are in the middle and surround a huge diamond find. testing does show large amounts of kimberlite. but the biggest reason to buy is the pps, where else can you risk that much for that big of gain except the lotto and you get the added plus of entertainment at allstocks...lol
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
noahltl
New Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for noahltl     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
BILL on STOCKWATCH

By: bill19336
16 Sep 2004, 03:13 PM EDT
Msg. 82230 of 82252
Jump to msg. #

***How credible are CMKX's detractors?

First, Carol Remond has done some wonderful work on several occasions. However, she has also had to retract several stories and apologize for shoddy investigative work. I place both of her articles attacking CMKX in the latter category and I posted a rebuttal to every rumor and innuendo she made in her last article.

What about Stock Patrol and it's leader, a former felon who has been involved in securities violations? Do you question his motives for publishing a piece which contained nothing more then poorly researched speculation. I posted a rebuttal to all the rumors put out by this "self anointed" savior.

In regards to Stock Watch and Lee Webb. Anyone who has read his work knows his biased and narrow-minded reports do not carry the credibility necessary for a rebuttal. If you believe that a reporter should be clear headed, objective and supply both sides of the story, then do yourself a favor and read his posts on the RB board. That should pretty much give you the knowledge to form your own judgment about his credibility.

In my opinion, it comes down to who you believe. Do you believe a reporter who has made several pubic retractions? Do you trust a former felon? Do you trust someone who has limited credibility?

Or do you trust a partner in a prestigious wall street legal firm? Do trust your own eyes and review the mineral rights CMKX holds? Do you trust an owner who is not afraid of publicity? Do you trust the numerous "publicly" traded companies that CMKX has joint ventures with? Do you trust the fact that Citibank (SBSH) started trading in CMKX many months ago. Do you trust the fact that Canadian and American regulatory bodies have allowed CMKX to continue trading billions of shares a day without a peep?

I find it very curious that these three have been attacking CMKX from the beginning. In the last week all of them have written strongly opinionated articles with slanted and one-sided reporting. Does it appear the "gang of 3" has joined forces with the bashers and the manipulators in attempt to destroy CMKX?

I can only raise the questions, it's up to each of you to answer them. Use that answer to decide whether to buy, sell or hold.

Good Luck and it's all speculation
http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CLB01219&read=82230


IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
will
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for will     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Is there any proof of this? If so, how much do they own?

"Do you trust the fact that Citibank (SBSH) started trading in CMKX many months ago."


IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
glassman
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for glassman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by WorkAHolic:
Since you asked:

73% of kimberlite formations exhibit similar mineral composition when these said formations are within the limits of close proximity and same geological formation and have not been diluted or tainted by glacial or sedimentary degregation.

US Geological Survey USGS/Reports: June 1997 / Volume 37, page 38


Seems to me that anyone can quote a source and it not be true or real. You guys should not believe everything that is put on this or any other board unless you do the research yourself. I've notice many false or misleading quotes of PRs, Magazines, Web Sources and Books that are presented as fact. The above is one of them. There is no such report, this was made up.


LOLOLOLOLOLOL.....


IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post 
Hey, guys, now this is really getting fun!

netsec,

I think you really did all the posters a good turn by posting Lee Webb's piece.

In addition to the "EGG" bit, I LMAO at least three times. Did anyone pick up on the following and notice the words "cult-like"? Sound familiar? I'd call that plagiarism!!!! LOL

Notwithstanding the fact that the dividend ratio was first provided to regulators as required under U.S. securities regulations by CMKM's much touted lawyer, D. Roger Glenn, and subsequently revised by the company at about the time it raised its authorized shares to 800 billion, many of the hundreds of cult-like Internet followers of Mr. Casavant's promotion dismiss any suggestion that CMKM has issued more than 779 billion shares.
--------------------------------------------

Will get back to noahltl's responses ASAP!
Remember the Boy Scout oath? LOL And it is not HOLD,HOLD,HOLD!

[This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited September 16, 2004).]

[This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited September 16, 2004).]


IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Highwaychild
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Highwaychild     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Not to fond of your 'cult' comment I must admit.There's not any sacrificial mombo-jumbo going on here, no ghosts or no spooks.
What IS spooky to me is how shallow your life must be just to live it crucifying CMKX.
But oh well,you're the one living it.You must have alot more time on your hands than I do I guess.I'm not sure if you go around hammering other stocks ALL the time like you do here but I guess you don't or Allstocks would have blocked your Walla$$ by now.Go figure.Not sure as to how you get away with it here.Shallow.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post 
noahltl wrote:

Mr Webb of Stockwatch is an apparent graduate of the Dan Rather School of Journalism.
---------------------------------------------

Can you point out one thing and prove that what Webb stated is untrue? Just one? If you cannot prove it, can you just point it out?

Your repost of comments by "Bill" shows some very serious flaws. He refers to rumors and innuendos, but then they are what he used
to supposedly refute anything said by Webb or anyone else in that post. I did notice that he made no mention of Victor Casavant's
question of illegal distribution of shares and a settlement of $1000 CA.

Aren't you the one who frequently says negative things about RB?

Why haven't you or anyone else responded to CMKX's making no mention of the fact that the flyover included claims of UCAD and more? Was it an attempt to mislead readers of the PR? If in error (which should have been obvious), why didn't CMKX promptly correct the statement and include all the parties? How many of those 100s of anamolies were on claims of other companies?

Why has no one addressed the depleted amount of claims? Instead, they keep referring to 1.9 and/or 1.4 mil acres.

I am willing to bet that there is some kind of close connection between the controlling shareholders of both CMKX and SGGM (St George). From where is SGGM getting the funds for that deal? Is it going to be from one hand to another and then back again?

Why, if UC and CMKX want to focus on exploring for diamonds (as stated), have they now given $1 mil to CIM for a share of the so-called profits?

Forgot, this noahltl:
RATTLE, RATTLE, RATTLE!!!!

[This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited September 16, 2004).]


IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
glassman
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for glassman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
hey guys, howzit???
i was just wondering....

if there is this big giant NS, why did the MM's "paint the tape" uptick for yesterdays close????
it makes more sense for them to be forcing it down if they are needing to cover shorts.....


IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
noahltl
New Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for noahltl     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by highwaychild:
Not to fond of your 'cult' comment I must admit.There's not any sacrificial mombo-jumbo going on here, no ghosts or no spooks.
What IS spooky to me is how shallow your life must be just to live it crucifying CMKX.
But oh well,you're the one living it.You must have alot more time on your hands than I do I guess.I'm not sure if you go around hammering other stocks ALL the time like you do here but I guess you don't or Allstocks would have blocked your Walla$$ by now.Go figure.Not sure as to how you get away with it here.Shallow.


Highway, we've been caught, Congressman Wallace is landing at the airport right now. Pass out the Kool-Aid


IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post 
Glass,

It appears the only Naked Shorts existing are the ones being worn by the CMKX shareholders. LOL


IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
glassman
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for glassman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
south american punch flavor...LOL
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Highwaychild
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Highwaychild     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
See this is what I'm talking about.You have any idea how many people he's insulting here with his crap.It's getting old.Any stock this low has nothing more to offer than another at this price.Yet people pick this particular stock to hammer.I mean seriously.Why?
Again and again and again and again and again.

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
glassman
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for glassman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
i think it has something to do with the ark thingy hiway....

IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
will
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for will     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Well, child, I think it goes something like this. People that have expeience either in the market, or with this stock saw the .0001 /.0002 jiggle then saw thw 1000%+ run, and retrace. They jus stop by to say, be careful, they have seen this or like things happen with this company. Then, WHAM! They get attacked by people who behave like starving wild dogs in a pit, and someone just threw some fresh meat in the pit. They are treated rudely and insulted for what originally for them was a word of warning. Now they get pissed off, and stay and antagonize the crap out of all strong long believers. Easy to figure out.

quote:
Originally posted by highwaychild:
See this is what I'm talking about.You have any idea how many people he's insulting here with his crap.It's getting old.Any stock this low has nothing more to offer than another at this price.Yet people pick this particular stock to hammer.I mean seriously.Why?
Again and again and again and again and again.


IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Highwaychild
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Highwaychild     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by glassman:
i think it has something to do with the ark thingy hiway....

Maybe...But many have been raining on this far longer than 40 days and 40 nights.But this .0003 Co. deserves more respect.With it's RECENT track record of being at .0001 and no reverse split,moving up,'tring' to move up an extange and getting out of the .0001 'celler'.I just don't get where all the haterd stemes from.


IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Highwaychild
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Highwaychild     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I see Will.
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
will
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for will     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Look up a post. It isn't hatred of the stock, it is the dislike of the treatment people get for just offering a differing opinion. I'd say the universal "you", has brought it on themselves here.
quote:
Originally posted by highwaychild:
Maybe...But many have been raining on this far longer than 40 days and 40 nights.But this .0003 Co. deserves more respect.With it's RECENT track record of being at .0001 and no reverse split,moving up,'tring' to move up an extange and getting out of the .0001 'celler'.I just don't get where all the haterd stemes from.


IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
noahltl
New Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for noahltl     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Can you point out one thing and prove that what Webb stated is untrue? Just one? If you cannot prove it, can you just point it out?
*****************************************
A: There was nothing in Webbs report that wasn't already known to those of us who have spent time doing DD instead of just hanging around bashing. However, the entire piece was propaganda and innuendo. It's way too verbose to take apart element by element. But I will just call attention to one part, the Petro Plus section. They note that Urban was there for almost exactly a year. One year contract? Looks likely. But they want to make it look sinister, so admitting that they didn't know why he left, they gave you two negative options, "ran or booted". What they didn't dwell on was the fact that he raised the pps from 15 cents to a dollar. It didn't collapse until after he was gone, and they use the questionable activities after he was gone to try and smear him further by some implication because he did business again at a much later date, with the CEO who succeeded him.
*****************************************
Your repost of comments by "Bill" shows some very serious flaws. He refers to rumors and innuendos, but then they are what he used
to supposedly refute anything said by Webb or anyone else in that post. I did notice that he made no mention of Victor Casavant's
question of illegal distribution of shares and a settlement of $1000 CA.

******************************************
A: I don't know Bill other than by his posts. Do you know, have proof, that Bill was using innuendo in his responses? Why would he comment on the Victor Casavant issue when the article clearly states it was petty. Obviously you have never run a corporation and had to keep up with the thousands of requirements and reports required.

*******************************************

Aren't you the one who frequently says negative things about RB?

********************************************

A: I have probably commented on some of the crazy things that people say over there just as I have aboout Sterlings PalTalk. But there are still decent, knowledgeable people posting at both of them.

******************************************

Why haven't you or anyone else responded to CMKX's making no mention of the fact that the flyover included claims of UCAD and more? Was it an attempt to mislead readers of the PR? If in error (which should have been obvious), why didn't CMKX promptly correct the statement and include all the parties? How many of those 100s of anamolies were on claims of other companies?

********************************************

A: We are joint venture partners with UCAD on the diamond explorations why wouldn't the Goldak have been used on both holdings? You and Mr Webb are the only ones trying to mislead readers. Do you think that the Goldak Survey people are involved now in your conspiracy theories? Do you think maybe they may know something about charting and surveying and how to survey the proper locations?

****************************************

Why has no one addressed the depleted amount of claims? Instead, they keep referring to 1.9 and/or 1.4 mil acres.

*******************************************

A: Because no one asked me. Melvin gave a completely rational answer on PalTalk about that a couple of weeks ago. The surveys revealed that some of the holdings were not likely to produce any valuable minerals. The costs of maintaining the mineral rights agreements are very high. They eliminated some locations from their lists of interest and sold off the rights or termninated them to save money.

******************************************

I am willing to bet that there is some kind of close connection between the controlling shareholders of both CMKX and SGGM (St George). From where is SGGM getting the funds for that deal? Is it going to be from one hand to another and then back again?

*******************************************

A: No one knows that yet except the prinicipals involved. I don't doubt that there are maneuvers going on with SGGM but with Roger involved, I also don't have any doubts that they are ethical, above board and designed to be a part of the ultimate merger.

*****************************************

Why, if UC and CMKX want to focus on exploring for diamonds (as stated), have they now given $1 mil to CIM for a share of the so-called profits?

****************************************

A: I really don't know if you are talking about some new transaction or the old one. CIM was a place to safely park the old shareholders while Urban took on the NSS problems with CMKX. CIM apparently owns a zinc mining operation, and if Urban feels it is beneficial to invest another million in it, who am I to question his business decisions. He's been making a lot more money than you or I, so I guess I'll just trust his business acumen more than mine or yours.

********************************************

Forgot, this noahltl:
RATTLE, RATTLE, RATTLE!!!!

********************************************

A: I knew I'd heard that some place before. Huh, there it is again.

[This message has been edited by noahltl (edited September 16, 2004).]

[This message has been edited by noahltl (edited September 16, 2004).]


IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Money_Penny
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Money_Penny     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by dwman:
Money...It's not like legal just came up with "ridiculous assumptions". We do have the Shore Gold PR from today. We also have the aereal survey. To call legal's assumptions ridiculous, is ridiculous. He should be able to share his thoughts without being called ridiculous.

OK first of all, my comment wasn't diretcted at legal. He posted a post from another board. My response was to the post from the other board.

Second, we may have aerial results and we may have "hundreds" of anomalies, but to say that we may have 140,000 acres of pure kimberlite does sound a little far fetched for my taste.

I'm too tired to do any kind of math here and I have to drive into a tropical storm tomorrow so good night to you all.


IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
noahltl
New Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for noahltl     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
By the way Wallace, don't expect me to keep answering all of your "manifestos". You apparently have a lot more time on your hands to think up this stuff, than I do to answer them.
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post 
Money_Penny,

Safe drive!
--------------------------------------------


noahltl's responses were as expected. Said nothing of substance concerning all the convoluted moves with and around CMKX. More excuses, trust and spin!


IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
noahltl
New Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for noahltl     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by Wallace#1:
Money_Penny,

Safe drive!


And your "questions" weren't what all on this thread have come to expect?

If you don't want my answers, don't ask the question.

[This message has been edited by noahltl (edited September 16, 2004).]


IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
noahltl
New Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for noahltl     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Since you like picking bill's posts apart, here's another one you can work on:


De Beers & Economic Diamond Mines in the FALC

By: bill19336
15 Aug 2004, 09:14 PM EDT
Msg. 12644 of 12660
Jump to msg. #

***BASHERS. here's some facts for you.***

Part I.
Read the article below and follow the links to get an idea of what the future holds for us.

"De Beers extends support"
The StarPhoenix (Saskatoon) 2004
June 29, 2004

Here's the link to the entire story: http://www.realestateappraisals.com/News/FLC0604.PDF

Below are some highlights from the article:

The president of Kensington Resources Ltd. Robert McCallum says that De Beers has committed $6 million in exploration activity from now until March 31.

Furthermore, he sees an increased interest by De Beers in finding out how many other, high-quality kimberlite bodies exist near the four bodies that have already been partially drilled during the past five years by the joint venture. He sees De Beers shifting priorities and possibly going in a completely new direction.
(I will speculate on the reasons for this change in part II.).

The four main kimberlite bodies identified by the joint venture already contain an estimated 369 million tonnes at an average modelled grade of 10 carats per hundred tonne, according to information De Beers has supplied to Kensington.
(CMKX has hundreds of anomalies.)

He says there are enough huge kimberlite bodies within the land the Fort a la Corne joint venture has staked that it could be possible for a central processing plant to be fed from three to four giant open pits, where the total tonnage of kimberlite could approach a billion tonnes.
(CMKX owns millions of acres of newly surveyed land.)

Using De Beers' computer-modelled estimates of $146 per carat from the 79-million-tonne kimberlite deposit, McCallum says each tonne of kimberlite in that deposit could be worth about $26 Canadian.

On the cost side, he says open-pit methods such as those used in the Fort McMurray tar sands could easily be kept around the $15-per-tonne mark. Considering the huge size of the deposit, an operating margin of $10 a tonne would make for a highly profitable large-scale diamond mine even if the grades are low by Canadian standards, McCallum said.
(Open pit is the fastest, cheapest and cleanest way to mine for diamonds).

As great as the above referenced material sounds, it's important to realize the constraints Urban and Roger are under. As I said in post 12589 (click on http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CLB00206&read=12589 ), Urban has to maintain the perceived scarcity of diamonds. De Beers has been hugely successful as a result of their "benevolent manipulation" of the diamond market. Thus, the last thing we need is for someone to "flood" the market with diamonds.

If Urban's ultimate plan is to transform the diamond industry from a cartel-controlled to a free market structure, we will need to be patient. I'm not saying we will not do well in the short term, I'm just saying that we will do incredibly well in the long term.

Good Luck

N O T E S:
1. Just for kicks, take a look at the map that compares CMKX's, De Beer's and Shore Gold's holdings in the FALC region.

2. Then consider each company's holdings in the FALC region.
CMKX = 2 million acres...............De Beers =58,000 acres................ Shore Gold = 30,000 acres

3. Now extrapolate some numbers from the figures De Beers has published.

4. It's about long term VALUATION, not OS, not Naked Shorts!!!

5. Don't allow bashers to confuse and frighten you, review the facts that the true longs have posted and decide for yourself.

6. The Punchy Palooka has no facts, he only promises to give us facts and has said he will apologize if he's wrong.
http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CLB00206&read=12644

By: bill19336
15 Aug 2004, 10:31 PM EDT
Msg. 12648 of 12660
Jump to msg. #

***Some more facts for bashers***

Part II

De Beers extends support part II.

Why do you suppose that De Beers just invested another 6 million in the Fort a La Corne Region?
In my opinion, it's because they know the center of the diamond universe will soon be located in the FALC region. I outline a few of the reasons for the shift from Africa to Canada below:
___________________________________________________

First, read the transcript of a radio interview with Dr. Mark Hutchison, the world renowned geologist.

*Dr. Hutchison: (quote) ""Well, Fort à la Corne is actually internationally known as being quite an exceptional area for kimberlites and for diamonds. And, as I say, it sets up an internationally-known area for large kimberlites and kimberlites of significant size and because they're diamondiferous, there’s a potential for very large quantities of diamonds"". (end quote).

-In my opinion, it is well known that many of De Beers older African mines appear to be on the brink of being "mined out".
http://www.ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CLB01219&read=50759
___________________________________________________

Below are some of the advantages that will turn Canada's Fort a La Corne region into the capital of the mining world:

*A stable political situation in Canada is a major savings since there is no need to appease petty dictators. Additionally, the need for extreme security measure to prevent attacks by political dissidents is not necessary.

-The African nations continue to suffer the instability of war and a fluid political situation (e.g., Sierra Leone, Botswana, etc.)

Follow the link below to read about De Beers current problems. http://www.ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CLB01219&read=64937
___________________________________________________

*The Canadian government is currently attempting to lure mining companies to it's mineral rich areas in an effort to create jobs. Some companies have even been able to receive tax concessions from the regulatory authorities.

-The African nations continue to be an obstacle to the mining companies working there.
__________________________________________________

*The necessary infrastructure already exists (i.e., roads, housing, airports, etc.)

-In remote locations expensive support networks must be built from scratch.

Follow the link below and read about the city De Beers built. http://edwardjayepstein.com/diamond/chap2.htm
___________________________________________________

*Canada is right next door to the largest diamond market in the world, that is, the United States.

-The shear distance from Africa to the largest target market adds an expensive layer of cost to the distribution system.
__________________________________________________

*The diamonds from Canada can be certified to be "conflict free".

-The world has been made aware of the suffering caused by illegal "blood diamonds".
__________________________________________________

*Since Canada has always had an abundance of experienced workers, the operating costs in Canada can be kept competitive while at the same time providing a living wage and decent working conditions to it's workforce. Additionally, it has always been difficult to lure the best and the brightest to the remote regions of the African continent where mining is done.

-The inhuman conditions some mining companies force upon their workers in Africa are an abomination to mankind.
__________________________________________________

*Canada's central location will make the movement of foodstuffs and equipment to the site much cheaper.

-Shipping costs become a consideration when everything must be shipped to a remote site (e.g., housing, heavy equipment, food, labor, etc.)
__________________________________________________

*Canada's FALC region is rich in other minerals.

-I bet Urban hasn't forgotten this fact.
__________________________________________________

Last but not least, don't forget that little old CMKX has hundreds of surveyed and filtered anomalies on the claims it controls. Patience is the only missing ingredient!!!

Good Luck and it's all speculation
http://ragingbull.lycos.com/mboard/boards.cgi?board=CLB00206&read=12648



IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Highwaychild
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Highwaychild     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by will:
Look up a post. It isn't hatred of the stock, it is the dislike of the treatment people get for just offering a differing opinion. I'd say the universal "you", has brought it on themselves here.

"You" was me right?Oh well I can't help but be for the underdog sometimes.It has worked out for me in this case.1/2 my 6 mill. shares are free.Wish I would have waited a little longer to sell some when I did or they all would have been.

Allways been for the underdog I guess.That's why I'm pulling for the Bears over the Pack this weekend by one point.You here that Upman?lol.I'm gone.But will look for your reply UP.LOL

[This message has been edited by highwaychild (edited September 16, 2004).]


IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post 
noahltl wrote:
By the way Wallace, don't expect me to keep answering all of your "manifestos". You apparently have a lot more time on your hands to think up this stuff, than I do to answer them.
---------------------------------------------
Well, noahltl, it's like this. When it comes to CMKX or any other security, someone has to think up the pertinent questions that others ignore and refuse to seek out the related facts. If there are no related facts available, then at least the question is out there so someone can see the whole picture so as to make a more prudent trading decision. Notice I did not say "investment" decision. I do not consider CMKX an investment of any kind...just something to trade or not to trade.

PS: Cannot be bothered with your latest manifesto! As usual, scroll right through them.

[This message has been edited by Wallace#1 (edited September 16, 2004).]


IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
will
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for will     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
No, child, you is the universal you, not you in particular. You in this case are the longs, believers, enforcers, promoters, defenders of Urban, Roger, Melvin, and the collective CMKX characters and players.

quote:
Originally posted by highwaychild:
"You" was me right?Oh well I can't help but be for the underdog sometimes.It has worked out for me in this case.1/2 my 6 mill. shares are free.Wish I would have waited a little longer to sell some when I did or they all would have been.

Allways been for the underdog I guess.That's why I'm pulling for the Bears over the Pack this weekend by one point.You here that Upman?



IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Upside
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for Upside     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
originally posted by highwaychild:
quote:
That's why I'm pulling for the Bears over the Pack this weekend by one point.You here that Upman?

I hear it but I don't like it one bit. No true American would ever root against the Packers! I'll spot you 9 points for 100 thousand shares of CMKX. What is that, about a 30 dollar bet?


IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Wallace#1
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Wallace#1         Edit/Delete Post 
Good night, y'all. Sleep well.
IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
noahltl
New Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for noahltl     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Posted by: zeninvestor32
In reply to: gump90 who wrote msg# 13060 Date:9/16/2004 8:35:19 PM
Post #of 13093

GUMP90

I'd be a fool if I wasn't concerned. Nobody likes going this length of time without the nuts and bolts of what's going on behind the scenes. I was hoping to have heard it by now. But we haven't. Oh well. As I have said, the company is asking a LOT of us in terms of placing our faith in them. And we are delivering. People have held strong. Now it's the company's turn to deliver. And deliver they must. I have said from the start that the shorts will play this out as long as they can to take advantage of investor impatience and the supreme knowledge that things always take longer than anyone would like. And I am simply commenting that we are entering a critical period that will test EVERYONE'S faith. This IMO is why the shorts have stuck around this long. I think they're as curious as the longs to see Urban's hand. Am I confident? I'm not sure that I've ever been "confident" about the outcome. I think I've always been "comfortable". Certainly all the evidence gives me a great deal of comfort in the bet I've placed. But without knowing more than is publicly available, I'm reserving the "confidence" until after we see Urban's hand.

I believe in this company 100%.
I believe the naked shorting is happening to an extensive degree 100%.
I believe Roger was brought on board to help the company rid itself of the naked short and bring a fantastic piece of property to proper valuation 100%.
I believe I could also be 100% wrong.

But that is what I believe. And that is the difference between beliefs and knowledge. I do not KNOW what will happen. But I BELIEVE we will do very well indeed. All I'm pointing out is that we are getting ready for CRUNCHTIME. And everyone better be READY.

PS You got a link on that shore gold financing PR?


Z

As always, these are my personal opinions.

Hopefully nobody in here is investing anything but "fun" money that they can afford to gamble with.
http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=4058277


IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
VNGNTN1
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for VNGNTN1     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Is this a reasonble thing to ask a company to do in light of current activity? I don't see how it could affect any legal things. Might alert compitition, that's why ask for only documents at drill site. What does this say if not answered ?
= = = = = = =
[QUOTE]Originally posted by VNGNTN1:
[B]DW
The filings @ registars office are current to about 3 days.
Drilling permits have been granted, in whose name ?
Maybe this is something we could reactivate and get this small answer?
- - - -
JUST eMAILED MELVIN
Would it be possible to scan & post the claim & permit to website where current drilling is being done ?
VAN
= = = = = = = =
DAY 1-No responce might be away from ofice?


IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
netsec
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for netsec     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
*******************************************
I believe in this company 100%.
I believe the naked shorting is happening to an extensive degree 100%.
I believe Roger was brought on board to help the company rid itself of the naked short and bring a fantastic piece of property to proper valuation 100%.
I believe I could also be 100% wrong.
********************************************

This guy is nuts. When you believe in something 100% there is no room for "non-belief".

I have a question for someone more knowledgeable with this stuff. Lets say there is 800billion shares sitting out there (I believe worst case). 800b$x.0003 = $240million. Why wouldn't DeBeers come in and just buy up every single share, even if they had to go to .0007 on them, if these claims are as good as a lot of people are saying? They can afford it (especially after they bought the shares and started mining) and it would allow them to continue their monopoly on the diamond market.

And I am not a basher nor pumper of this stock. I bought in late and I am sitting on 2.75million for the bargain price of .000564 (averaged down). Just want to hear some theories and answers to my question.

Thanks.


IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
  This topic comprises 75 pages: 1  2  3  ...  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  ...  73  74  75   

Post New Topic  New Poll  
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
Open Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Allstocks.com Message Board Home

© 1997 - 2021 Allstocks.com. All rights reserved.

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2

Share