Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
Post New Topic  New Poll  
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
my profile login | register | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» Allstocks.com's Bulletin Board » Micro Penny Stocks, Penny Stocks $0.10 & Under » CMKX ... VI ... The Saga Continues (Page 17)

 - UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!   This topic comprises 75 pages: 1  2  3  ...  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  ...  73  74  75   
Author Topic: CMKX ... VI ... The Saga Continues
noahltl
New Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for noahltl     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
SGGM now .23 / .30
Posts: 2 | From: Noblesville, IN | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
noahltl
New Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for noahltl     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Now .30 / .35 This things on fire this afternoon.
Posts: 2 | From: Noblesville, IN | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
WinsumLosesum
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for WinsumLosesum     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
SGGM opened @ .09

Was .018 around 3:30, then just jumped directly to .28 and is now .35

????????????????????????????


Posts: 1872 | From: right here | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
noahltl
New Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for noahltl     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Ask at .40
Posts: 2 | From: Noblesville, IN | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
WinsumLosesum
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for WinsumLosesum     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by noahltl:

Stock Information: Par Value: $ 0.001
Total Capital: $ 950,000,000,000

That's a typo, right? 950 Billion dollars?


Posts: 1872 | From: right here | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
tic_toc
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for tic_toc     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
whats the bid?
Posts: 768 | From: Ingland | Registered: May 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
WinsumLosesum
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for WinsumLosesum     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
SGGM just traded @ .40
CMKX just traded @ .0004

rrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr


Posts: 1872 | From: right here | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
dwman
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for dwman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I smell sggm pps increase to $.50 to $.56 and then 1 for 1 merger announcement. Go sggm.
Posts: 1005 | From: Grapevine, TX 76051 | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
dwman
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for dwman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
those sggm pps increases are occurring on volumes of 1 to 5 thousand.
Posts: 1005 | From: Grapevine, TX 76051 | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
WinsumLosesum
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for WinsumLosesum     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Just for the record...

sarki316
Member posted August 25, 2004 11:48            
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Pencil down Sept 7th on your calander. That is when CMKX will make there huge announcment. REGARDING EVERYTHING. AND IT WILL BE VERY VERY GOOD.


(Come on, sarki... you have 8 more hours to be right!)



Posts: 1872 | From: right here | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
i dont know about you folks but i think sggm has been the best stock buy i've seen in a while .02 a week ago to .32...that a passable % increase for 1 week. the a/s might be 950 billion but the float cant be over 10 million maybe 20 million. it has to be more then ucad they are up 1.05 on 55 thousand
Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
dwman
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for dwman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I forgot about that win... yes... go sarki!
Posts: 1005 | From: Grapevine, TX 76051 | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
skippy
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for skippy     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Has anyone considered the "ium" to be palladium? It is a precious metal used globally.

Just a thought.


Posts: 57 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
dwman
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for dwman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
The comment was made by someone that 3 or 4 questions were asked about the mystery metal and none of the guesses were right. Surely uranium should have been one they asked about and got a "no" answer. Does anyone know if uranium was one that was mentioned. I still think it was uranium.
Posts: 1005 | From: Grapevine, TX 76051 | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Prdponce
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Prdponce         Edit/Delete Post 
BIG TIP!!!!!

The next time play the CO. that CMKX get into an agreement with.

See UCAD, GEMM, SGGM they all went up, yet we stayed the same.

Still holding


Posts: 5120 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
noahltl
New Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for noahltl     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Our JV's had a great day. Our turn can't be far behind. Can it?


ECPNe .65 +.07 +12%
GEMM .037 +.007 +23%
UCAD 5.24 +1.09 +26%
SGGM .35 +.28 +400%


Posts: 2 | From: Noblesville, IN | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
skippy
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for skippy     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I agree, uranium would be an obvious guess, just don't know that palladium would be.
Posts: 57 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
kevy0899
Member posted September 07, 2004 15:08
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi Bill... I emailed ETRADE a similar question. Find below a part of their response.. I emailed them a second time asking them if the 1/1 spinoff was with GEMM and they replied yes. Hope this is useful.
Thank you for your inquiry regarding the pending CMKX spin-offs. There are currently three spin offs taking place. The ex-date for the first transaction is 8/20/04. This is the date on which the seller, and not the buyer, of a stock will be entitled to a recently announced dividend/spin-off. It is indicated in newspaper listings with an "x". The shares from the spin-off are due to payout on 9/24/04. The terms of the spin off are 1 share for each 103950 shares held of CMKX. If you are due to receive the shares, you should see them appear in the first week of October.
The second spin off's ex-date is 8/31/04, with a pay date of 10/1/04. The terms of the spin off are .0256 shares for each 1 share held of CMKX. The third spin off's ex-date is 9/17/04, with a pay date of 10/3/04. The terms of the spin off is 1 share for each 1 share held of CMKX.


1 for 1 on the gemm split???? that has to be wrong. the gemm dividend is 95,502,027 shares which would make our o/s the same number. even if they add the option its only 222,000,000 plus change in shares. our o/s is not 222 million. even sterling, zen & dr.d smoking dope for a week straight couldn't come up with that number...lol. i think someone at etrade has a fat finger moment kevy. sure would be nice though


Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
WinsumLosesum
Member


Icon 1 posted      Profile for WinsumLosesum     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by dwman:
The comment was made by someone that 3 or 4 questions were asked about the mystery metal and none of the guesses were right. Surely uranium should have been one they asked about and got a "no" answer. Does anyone know if uranium was one that was mentioned. I still think it was uranium.

But if the "ium" was still such a secret, what do you think would have been the answer even if the guy got it RIGHT?

I can't imagine a company deciding to keep something confidential... UNLESS some GUESSES it !


Posts: 1872 | From: right here | Registered: Apr 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
dwman
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for dwman     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Good point win, but I would hope they would not invite guesses and then lie about the answers. I really have no basis for thinking they would lie though. Also, that it is uranium is just my opinion but it sure would help the government's energy shortage.
Posts: 1005 | From: Grapevine, TX 76051 | Registered: Aug 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
noahltl
New Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for noahltl     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by bill1352:
kevy0899
Member posted September 07, 2004 15:08


Bill, wasn't the third dividend CIM?


Posts: 2 | From: Noblesville, IN | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
Prdponce
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for Prdponce         Edit/Delete Post 
From Another board.

By: tonicma
07 Sep 2004, 04:04 PM EDT
Msg. 78287 of 78289
Jump to msg. #
CMKX not going up due to MM applying "reverse psychology" on us. Have you read oh it. Bascially the idea is to make the person think another way by "allowing" them to do what they intended to do in the first place due to their desire to defy the another person. So how does the MM apply this. Very simple.
1) MM want you to sell CMKX
2) shareholders go "NO MM I am buying more and holding no matter what happens"
3) MM go ok, well since we can't "make" them to sell than we will let them just hold and buy.
4) MM go "ok fine buy it and hold it"
5) We hold and is happy
6) MM make other company "close" to us to ballistic
7) shareholder go "what the f**k"
8) shareholder get pissed off at "THEIR INVESTMENT", note they are not pissed off at the MM but their investment.
ie. "why is everybody going up and we are not damn it?"
" I wish I bought GEMM, SGGM, UCAD instead of CMKX"
9) Shareholder began to "question" their CMKX holding.
10) shareholder go "well maybe I'll sell some of mine say > 50% gains and buy ucad and sggm
11) MM get your shares
12) we buy sggm, gemm, ucad
13) MM bring these baby down hard (as we have seen from gemm and ucad)
14) shareholder panic, gets pissed off sells ucad gemm sggm.
After this the shareholder does NOT buy anymore CMKX immediately because of their previous action of selling CMKX and due to the fact that they still have "some" cmkx BUT the gains they made from CMKX is lost due to the declining of ucad gemm sggm they bought
MM at the end benefits BIG time why
1) due to shareholder selling of cmkx, they cover and keep price down
2) They make profit from "shorting" UCAD SGGM GEMM by selling high than buying back low.
So people, don't worry about the sggm going up etc. it will come down hard real hard due to people buying it. just watch and see. We saw it happen to ucad AND GEMM.
Just hold your cmkx shares.

[This message has been edited by prdponce (edited September 07, 2004).]


Posts: 5120 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
noah...no cim was the 7/19/04 and gem was 8/02/04
Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
kevy0899
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for kevy0899     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I have to admit... I was shocked too. But I am also new to this and didnt really know what to think. Thanks for the response.

quote:
Originally posted by bill1352:
kevy0899
Member posted September 07, 2004 15:08



Posts: 20 | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
kevy0899
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for kevy0899     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
I just sent ETRADE a mail asking them to confirm or deny the 1/1 GEMM statement they made.. I will let you know the response.


quote:
Originally posted by kevy0899:
I have to admit... I was shocked too. But I am also new to this and didnt really know what to think. Thanks for the response.

[QUOTE]Originally posted by bill1352:
[b]kevy0899
Member posted September 07, 2004 15:08


[/B][/QUOTE]

Posts: 20 | Registered: Jul 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
noahltl
New Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for noahltl     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by bill1352:
noah...no cim was the 7/19/04 and gem was 8/02/04


Thanks Bill, I've got 'em written down now. So confusing.


Posts: 2 | From: Noblesville, IN | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
$CashMaker$
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for $CashMaker$     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
Market Cap
273,779.20*

Shares Outstanding
684,448,000*

*Numbers include tradable shares only

Today's Volume
-491,261,259
http://tools.thestreet.com/rmy/quotes.html?osymb=tfct&pg=qcn&timer=&symb=cmkx&go_btn.x=14&go_btn.y=9

[This message has been edited by $CashMaker$ (edited September 07, 2004).]


Posts: 1208 | From: SS, Texas, USA | Registered: Feb 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
cndboy
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for cndboy     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
holy shmoly.... what happened to SGGm today? any news release ? nice jump
Posts: 200 | From: Canada | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
noahltl
New Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for noahltl     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
COMPOUNDED MATH by zeninvestor

Posted by: zeninvestor32
In reply to: None Date:9/7/2004 4:19:42 PM
Post #of 11641

COMPOUNDED MATH

Assumptions:

1. 800B share naked short.
2. 200B share OS on SGGM.
3. 40B share float in CMKX (float which does not include up to 760B restricted)
4. Urban distributes unrestricted SGGM 5:1 to only unrestricted CMKX (choosing to forego insider profit)

5:1 ratio on 800B naked short shares equals a 4 Trillion share short position hitting the books on SGGM for those short. Multiply that by .35 = $1.35T share short position. LOL

Do I believe the above will happen? No. Do I think it's possible? Sure, anything's possible at this stage. LOL I challenge someone to give me an argument as to why the above could NOT happen outside of my variables being off. Fun food for thought and proof positive that we know NOTHING since there are so many variables at the company's disposal. This has got to be the finest mystery ever crafted in the history of the financial markets. I can't wait for the resolution. Hopefully it will be a Sixth Sense-like spinaround that leaves you breathless. Excuse me, I have to go back to the counter for my free popcorn bucket refills.


Z

As always, these are my personal opinions.

Hopefully nobody in here is investing anything but "fun" money that they can afford to gamble with.

http://www.investorshub.com/boards/read_msg.asp?message_id=3981092



Posts: 2 | From: Noblesville, IN | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
noahltl
New Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for noahltl     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
xxed

SGGM Manipulation?

I was wondering if anyone thinks that it is possible that SGGM is turning the tables on the MM's.

This is the O/S as of 2002:

SGGM -- St. George Metals, Inc.
Com (1 Cent) http://www.pinksheets.com/quote/company_profile.jsp?symbol=SGGM

Shares Outstanding: 14,487,159 as of 2002-10-31

It would take about $144,871 to buy up all of the outstanding shares of SGGM at the price of .01 cents per share.
(SGGM is already shelling out 10 million dollars to CMKX, so 144 thousand wouldn't be hard for them to come up with.)

If the law of supply and demand holds true, they could conceivably bring the pps up to any price they want. (SGGM could even be buying up all of the available shares themselves, to do this.)

Now for specolation:
When they bring the pps up to the price that SGGM is happy with, let's say .50 cents per share,

What would happen if CMKX lets loose a pr stating that the entire 200 billion SGGM shares controlled by CMKX would be offered as a dividend to its shareholders, in restricted form, on a 1 for 1 basis.

What would happen to the pps of CMKX?

Just pure specolation.
What does anyone think of this?

xedd



Posts: 2 | From: Noblesville, IN | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
noahltl
New Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for noahltl     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
jet0525

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I've no concerns with the lack of PR's, nor do I care when they release one. I see the activity that is happening in the partnerships we're forming, I see Roger Glenn playing his cards, I see action occuring both in the stock market and in the drilling and am happy with the direction. To me, the fact that our partners value is increasing while ours stays flat is an indicator to me that they are trying to run up the other stocks because it's easier to control and they can use the increases as a way to shake investor confidence in CMKX. Doing that kind of thing just makes me hold onto my shares that much tighter.


Posts: 2 | From: Noblesville, IN | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
HarryHar
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for HarryHar     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
In response to SGGM manipulation...yeah it probably is happening. But if CMKX distributes the only free trading shares in the market to its shareholders (200billion), and the price is manipulated up to .50, the price of cmkx will increase, and then plummet back to where it was before. Once people receive the shares of SGGM, they will sell because they know it's not worth 50 cents. Obviously it's not, since it was manipulated to get there. In the example above the price is achieved through taking away the float. But when 200 billion shares are released eventually into float, that price per share is gonna be history. It'll drop, depending on how many shares are outstanding assuming they don't have any good news of their own that is independent of CMKX's business. Just my thought.
Posts: 212 | Registered: Jan 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
bill1352
Member


Member Rated:
4
Icon 1 posted      Profile for bill1352     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
i'm still guessing no news till after the gemm shares are paid except maybe a pr stating they took the option on the rest of the gemm shares. i'm wondering and i have looked but no legal answer found yet...can cmkx change the shares given on CIM without a pr stating so. i don't think a pr is legally binding. as there is no otc bb post on gemm as yet and if things follow suit it will work out to a third o/s. and since the pay date is 3 weeks give or take an explaination of the differance might be nice. since cmkx doesn't seem to have any plans of telling us it might help if we knew if they can change the amount without telling anyone. 20 billion shares fits all the info we do know for sure. the a/s of 800 billion and a few shares differance for 11 trading days. that is if each shares owned has been counted for each x-date. any facts found either way would be welcome.
Posts: 3651 | From: Algonac, MI. 48001 | Registered: Jun 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
VNGNTN1
Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for VNGNTN1     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
NOAH
This is old data .
- - - - - - -
SGGM -- St. George Metals, Inc.
Com (1 Cent) http://www.pinksheets.com/quote/company_profile.jsp?symbol=SGGM

Shares Outstanding: 14,487,159 as of 2002-10-31
- - - - - - - -
I have seen several references to 950b.
VAN


Posts: 1424 | From: Peoria, IL. USA | Registered: Oct 2003  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
noahltl
New Member


Rate Member
Icon 1 posted      Profile for noahltl     Send New Private Message       Edit/Delete Post 
quote:
Originally posted by VNGNTN1:
NOAH
This is old data .
- - - - - - -
SGGM -- St. George Metals, Inc.
Com (1 Cent) http://www.pinksheets.com/quote/company_profile.jsp?symbol=SGGM

Shares Outstanding: 14,487,159 as of 2002-10-31
- - - - - - - -
I have seen several references to 950b.
VAN



Pink sheets shows them still in VA. Van. The Secy of State post above is from July 19, 2004.

You must be talking about the repost. Yes that link is old.

[This message has been edited by noahltl (edited September 07, 2004).]


Posts: 2 | From: Noblesville, IN | Registered: Oct 2004  |  IP: Logged | Report this post to a Moderator
  This topic comprises 75 pages: 1  2  3  ...  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  ...  73  74  75   

Post New Topic  New Poll  
Topic Closed  Topic Closed
Open Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


Contact Us | Allstocks.com Message Board Home

© 1997 - 2021 Allstocks.com. All rights reserved.

Powered by Infopop Corporation
UBB.classic™ 6.7.2

Share